1992-26 Accepts Revised Comp Plan Support DocumentsR E S O L U T I O N 26-92
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING ATTACHMENT
A", THE- REVISED SUPPORT DOCUMENTS FOR THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE THAT REVISED TABLE 11-2,
THE 5 YEAR SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS, 1991-1995,
AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 10-92.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,
the Village Council adopted Ordinance No. 10-92 that
revised Table 11 - 2 of the Comprehensive Plan and,
WHEREAS, the support documents for the
Comprehensive Plan need to be a matter of record in the
Village files,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF
NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The support documents, Attachment "A",
for the revisions to Table 11 - 2 of the Comprehensive
Plan, as adopted by Ordinance No. 1o- 92 are hereby
accepted.
Section 2. This resolution shall take effect
immediately upon passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 9th DAY OF JULY 1992
-s~-~..
YOR
ATTEST:
0
VILLAGE C RK
1
ompplan.res _ 1 _
ATTACHMENT "A"
1
1
11.9.1 FISCAL YEAR 1991 92 FY 92
11.4.1.1 Population Projections
11.4 FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS UPDATE
Historicai population growth in the Village during the 1960-1987
per:i.od 1s pr.~esented on TABLE 3-6, (page 3-23) of the 1989 SUPPORT
ResearchA(BEBR)Aoitndversity ofeFlorida,othecVillageahad8as1987s
population of 12,782 residents.
The 1990 U.S. Census established the V331age's population at 11,343
residents, which amounts to one less resident than the 1980 Census
figure (despite the fact that 548 housing units were constructed
during the 1980-1990 period.) In opposition to the 1990 Census
Iigure, the Village staff is currently investigating the feasibility
of contracting the Bureau of the Census to perform a special census
to refine the current population level. It is the Village's position
that the 1990 figure published by BEBR is more accurate than that of
the Census. As a result, updated current estimates are displayed on
TABLE 11-8, which is a revision of TABLE 3-6 of the 1989 SUPPORT
DOCUMENTATION. Estimates were prepared by Land Research Management,
Inc, based on the application of household size rates to historical
residential building `permit data. The 1991 estimate also includes
the Fisherman's Village (125 residents) and Twelve Oaks (476
residents) annexations.
Projected population levels, assuming the buildout of remaining
vacant land within the Village, derived in the SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
for the 92-1 Comprehensive Plan Amendments are as follows:
1994 Proiections
Resident Population 19,121
Seasonal Population 2,120
- Total
1997 •Proiections
1
Resident Population
Seas~~nal'POpulation
Total
1999 Proiections
Resident Population
Seasonal Population
Total
11-28
16,824
19,704
2,120
16,824
19,898
2,120
17,018
Addendum: 3/92
1
1
TABLE 11-B
.Revised 1989 TABLE 3-6
PERMANENT RESIDENT POPULATION ESTIMATES
YEAR PALM BEACH
COUNTY TOTAL NORTH PALM BEACH
TOTAL
COUNTY SHARE (96)
19601• 238,106 2,864 1.2
19701• 398,993 9,035 2.6
19801• 576,758 11,344 2.0
19812• 615,165 11,393 l,g
19822• 637,940 12,005 1.9
19032' 652,562 12,123 l,g
19842• 682,638 12,292 1.9
19852' 713,253 12,379 1.7
19862• 752,115 12,968 1.7
19872' 789,533 12,782 1.6
].9682' ~ 817,528 12,742 1.6
19892'
i 841,490 12,812 1.5
_
1990 863,5181' 12,8373' 1.4
1991 883,0442• 13,4443'4• 1.5
1.
2.
. 3.
4.
NPBTABLE.3-6
a
11-29 Addendum: 3/92
U.S. Bureau of the Census
University of Florida, Bureau of Business and Economic
Research; April 1st of each year.
1
1
11.4.1.2 Existing Public Facility Conditions and 5-Year Schedule of
Improvements Recommendations
Sanitary Sewer (Wastewater)
According to Seacoast Utilities Authority staff, existing wastewater
treatm~:nt facilities have a combined capacity of 7.58 MGD. Planned
and approved capacity expansions currently underway total 3.47 MGD.
Totai existing and committed capacity is therefore 11.05 MGD.
Current demand (i.e. September 30, 1991) is 7.07 MGD and future
commitments total 0.69 MGD. Total existing and committed demand is
therefore estimated to be 7.7 MGD or 70.2% of existing and committed
capacity.
Average and maximum daily wastewater fldw estimates and projections
for the'Village are presented on the following table:
Resident
Year Population
1991 13,494
1994 19,121
1999 14,898 ..
Average Daly
Flow (MGD)
1.19
1.19
1.26
Maximum, Daily
Flow (MGD)
1.80
1.89
2.00
1Resid~nt population x 89.5 gallons/day
2Resident population x 134 gallons/day
Based on the above projections, the Village is expected to generate
an additional 0.2 MGD of wastewater demand during the 1991-1999
period, .or 6% of the remaining uncommitted existing and approved
capacity.
Wastewater facilities serving the Village are under the control of
Seacoast-Utilities Authority. As a result, the Village does not
have the authority to implement wastewater facilities improvements
through the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements.
Due to the amount of available capacity defined above, it is
concluded that the Village Director of Public Services may issue
additional statements of Adequate Public Facilities Determination
during FY 1992, provided that the conditions and standards in
Chapter 2, Section VI.C.2:e.(1), Section VI C.4 and Section VI
C.S.(d) of the Village Land Development Regulations have been met.
11-30
Addendum: 3/92
Potable Water
According to Seacoast Utilities Authority staff, existing potable
water treatment facilities have a combined capacity of 29.0 MGD.
Current demand (Seetember 30, 1991) is 20.89 MGD and future
commitments total 1.03 MGD. Total existing and committed demand is
therefore estimated to be 21.92 MGD, or 75.5% of existing capacity.
Average and maximum daily potable water flow estimates and
projections for the Village are presented in the following table.
Year Resident Average Daily 1' Maximum Daily2'
Population Flow (MGD) Flow (MGD)
1991 13,499 1;77
2.63
1994 14,121 1.86 I
2.76
1999 19,898
1.96
2.91
1. Resident population x 131.7 gallons/day
' 2. Resident population x 195.5 gallons/day
Based upon the above projections, the Village is expected to generate
an additional 0.28 MGD of potable awter demand during the 1991-1999
period, or 9% of the remaining uncommitted capacity.
Potable water facilities serving the Village are under the control
of Seacoast Utilities Authority. As a'result, the Village does not
have the authority to implement potable water facility improvements
through the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements.
Due to the amount of available capacity defined above, it is
concluded that the Village Director of Public Services may issue
additional Statements of Adequate Public Facilities Determination
during FY 1992, provide that the conditions and standards in Chapter
2, Section VI.C.2.e:(1), Section VI C.4 and Section VI.C.5.(a) of
the Village Land Development Regulations have been met.
Soli____d Waste
The capacity of the Regional Solid Waste Disposal Facility is
1,095,000 tons per year. According to the Solid Waste Authority
staff, current demand (i.e. year ending September 30, 1991) is 624,000
tons per year, or 57% of existing capacity.
' Waste disposal estimates and projections for the Village are
presented in the following table.
11-31 Addendum: 3/92
1
Solid Waste Generatiop (tons/year)
Year Commerciall Residential2 Total
1991 3,887 10,271 14,158
1999 3,956 10,788 19,794
1999 3,980 11,382 15,362
7
1 Based on generation rate of 6.0 tons/acre/year
2 Based on generation rate. of 0.769 tons/per.capita/year
generate an additional 1,204 tons of solid waste er o
p year.
Based upon the above projection, the Village is ex ected t
Solid Waste transfer and disposal facilities serving the Village are
under the control of the Palm Beach Count Solid Waste Authority. As
a result, the Village does not have authority to implement •facility
improvements through the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements.
Due to the amount of available capacity defined above, it is
concluded that the Village Director of Public Services may issue
additional Statements of Adequate Facilities Determination during FY
1992, provided that the conditions and standards in Chapter'2,
Section VI.C.2.e.(1); Section VI.C.4. and Section VI.C.5.(e) of the
Village Land Development Regulations are met.
The current 5-Year Schedule of Improvements (i.e. 1990-1995 version)
contains a $15,000 study to assess the feasibility of establishing a
Centralized Toxic Household and Commercial Waste Program in the
Village. However, the Solid Waste Authority, due to its countywide
disposal responsibilities, and the liabilities and costs associated
with a municipal program, recommends that the Village not implement
a municipal program.
Since the completion of the Comprehensive Plan the SWA has
completed a countywide inventory (verification survey) of toxic and
hazardous waste generators which categorizes businesses by type and
volume of generated substances. Further, a permanent disposal
facility has been established at Bee Line Highway and Jog Road,
approximately 4.5 miles from the Village. The permanent facility is
available for disposal of household wastes at no-charge, and
commercial wastes on a cost-of-disposal basis. According to the SWA,
the current program is working well and the SWA recommends that the
Village supplement its efforts by: (1) publicizing the current
11-32 Addendum: 3/92
program to Village residents and businesses; and (2) reviewing the
verification survey to determine its accuracy. As a result, the
' S-Year Schedule of improvements should be revised to reflect these
recommendations.
Due to the amount of available capacity defined above, it is
concluded that the Village Director of Public Services may issue
additional Statements of Adequate Public Facilities Determination
during FY 1992, provided that the conditions and standards in Chapter
2, Section VI.C.2.e.(1),.Section VI.C.9 and Section VI.C.(e) of
the Village Land Development Regulations have been met.
Drainape (Storm Water)
The 1989 Drainage Sub-Element of the Village of North Palm Beach
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION recommended that a Master Drainage Study be
completed which would include the following tasks:
A. Basic Studies
1. Inventory and location of existing systemst
2. Drainage basin location refinements and
3. Collection of water quality data for each basin.
B. Analysis and Calculations
1. Establish design and analysis criteria, calculation of
adequacy of historic storm events and inventory of problem
areas;
2. Determination of condition, life expectancy and maintenance
requirements for each system;
3. Determination of stormwater impacts upon the quality 'of
receiving waters and recommendations for modifications to
overcome any adverse impactst and
9. Recommettdations for the design, construction and maintenance
of existing system deficiencies and new construction required
~ to meet unsatisfied system demands.
The INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION element recommended a cooperative
drainage assessment of the Sandalwood Basin in the City of Palm Beach
Gardens to be completed in conjunction with the Master Drainage
~ Study.
The current 5-Year Schedule of Improvements (FY 1990-1995) has
identified $45,000 to complete the Master Drainage Study during FY
1991 through the FY 1992 period and $25,000 to complete the
' cooperative drainage assessment during FY 1994.
Since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, Palm Beach County
has begun to implement the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit requirements of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act. The'implementation of the NPDES permit program is
expected ;to duplicate some or all of the requirements of the
proposed Master Drainage Study. As a result, it is recommended that
the Master Drainage Study be delayed until the NPDES permit program
is completed.
The following narrative summarizes the anticipated contents, results
and schedule of the NPDES program. .
The Water Quality Act (WQA)of 1987 added Section 402(p) of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) to require iaPA to establish regulations setting forth
NPDES permit application requirements for stormwater discharge. The
Northern Palm Beach County•Water Control bistrict (NPBCWCD) applied
for and was granted the responsibility of implementing the NPDES
permit application requirements and was designated as the Lead
Applicant. The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER)
petitioned the EPA to include all municipalities in Palm Beach
County, together with the Florida Department of Transportation,
five Special Districts (298s) and unincorporatated Palm Beach
County, as Co-Applicants. The Co-Applicants constitute a medium
municipality under EPA guidelines •promulgated in the regulations.
' The NPDES permit application consists of two parts, described as
follows:
PART 1
A. General .Information: identifies applicant.
B. Legal Authority: description of existing legal authority (inter-
local agreements) to control discharge to the municipal separate
storm sewer system.
C. Sources Identification: description of historical use of
ordinances to limit discharges, USGS topographic maps, description
of land use activities, estimates of population densities,
estimates of runoff coefficients, location and description of
landfills, known NPDES permits, discharge control structures and
publicly owned lands.
D. Discharge Characterization: rainfall data, discharge data,
water quality impacts and identification of water bodies, summary
of CWA goals, field screening for illicit connections and illegal
~ dumping and related concerns.
E. Management Programs: description of existing programs to control
pollutants and description of existing programs to identify
illicit connections.
F. Fiscal Resources: description of financial resources available to
I complete Part 2 of the permit application, description of budget
for existing stormwater management programs and an overview of
' of financial resources.
11-34 Addendum: 3/92
1
PART 2
A. Adequate legal authority established to (1) control contribution
of pollutants associated with industrial activity, (2) prohibit
illicit discharges, (3) control spills and dumping, (4) require
compliance and (5) carry out inspections and monitoring.
B. Provide an inventory of sources of industrial activity.
(Note: The NPDES program includes disturbing 5 or more acres .of
land as "industrial activity°.)
C. Collection, sampling and analysis of ,effluent.
D. Proposed Management Program: structural and source control
measures to reduce pollutant loadings.
E. Assessment Controls: estimated reduction in pollutant loadings
expected as a result of the storm water management program.
F. Fiscal Analysis:. analysis of capital needed for operations.
As a result of the'work presently being performed as part of the
NPDES Permit Program, it is recommended that the Village delay its
Master Drainage Study until the results of Part 1 and Part 2 of the
NPDES Program have been completed and submitted (May 1993). It is
further recommended that the Village review the results of the NPDES
Permit Program and, if necessary, revise the Scope of Services of
the Master Drainage Study to avoid duplicating efforts contained in
Parts 1 and 2, and to incorporate the data, recommendations and
applicable components of the management system into the study.
The Village Director of Public Services,may issue additional
Statements of Adequate Public Facilities Determination during
FY 1992, provided that the conditions atld standards in Chapter
2, Section VI.C.2.e.(1), Section VI.C.4 and VI.C.5.(f).of the e
Village Land Development Regulations have .been met.
Recreation
The current S-Year Schedule of Improvements (i.e. 1990-1995). has
programmed j20,000 to complete a User Survey and Master Recreation
Plan for the Village during FY 1990, the User Survey has been
completed (Ref.: ATTACHMENT A); however, the Master Recreation Plan
should be delayed until the following actions are completed:
1. Transfer of ownership to the Village of the 5-acre parcel of land
located adjacent to Prosperity Harbor in Planning Area 6A. This
property is currently the subject of proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment No. 92-1.5B; and
2. Transfer of the Anchorage Park Wastewater Treatment Facility
property to the Village.
Both of these transactions will have an impact upon master recreation
planning within the Village. The scheduled Master Recreation Plan
11-35 Addendum: 3/92
h
should be delayed until the final di:;position of the above .actions.
It is therefore recommended that the project be rescheduled to FY
1995 and the project cost be increased to $28,000 to account for
additi~nal planning work necessitated by .the inclusion of the above
two properties withitt the inventory of Village-owned recreational
lands. it is recommended that the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements be
updated to account for the scheduling and program changes discussed
above.
TABLE 11-9, which 1s a revision of TABLE 9-4 (page 9-19) of the
1989 Village of North Paim Beach SUpport.Documentation is included
to reflect revised buildout population figures resulting from
proposed 92-1 Comprehensive Plan amendments. Revised estimates
and projections are presented in Section 11.4.1.1, above.
Revised buildout projections result in no change to previously
determined demand for. additional recreation and open space
facilities, as per the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Support
Documentation; however, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
No. 92-1.5A will add an additional 5.0 acres of neighborhood
' park supply. As a result, the previously defined additional
demand for one acre. of neighborhood park (Ref: TABLE 11-9) is
more than adequately met.
}3ased upon the above analysis, it is concluded that the Village
Director of Public Services may issue additional Statements of
Adequate Public Facilities Determination during FY 1992, provided
that the conditions and standards in Chapter 2, Section VI.C.2.
e. (1), Section VI.C.4 and Section VI.C.5.(b) of the Village
Land Development Regulations have been met.
Conse__ rvation °
The current 5-Year Schedule of Improvements (i.e. 1990-1995) has
programmed $10,000 to complete a C-17 Canal Bank Erosion Control
Study. Due to current capital funding limitations (Ref.: Section
11.9.1.2.3), it is recommended that the project be rescheduled to
Fiscal Year 1999.
The current 5-Year Schedule of Improvements has programmed $11,000
to complete a Lakeside Park Erosion Control Study. In lieu of this
Study, the Village has entered into a Project Agreement for a
lakeside Park shoreline restoration program with the Florida Inland
Navigation District (FIND). The project budget has been established
at $106,000, with the Village and FIND each responsible for a 507
s}~are. The Projr_ct Agreement was executed on Ma 8 lc
I expected to be completed during F'Y ].993. The scope~of,workr~towbel` is
completed under the Project Agreement fs summarized below.
Addendum: 3/92
11-36
wl
I~
O
F
w
0
w
w
z~
w
a
a
0
u
a
N
a l 1 1 1 1
'
7
ti i
1 1 `I 1
N N
a U U
a roro
F
O b W
w N N
Q
z
oz
a
i').
U
N N
N CI
u u
ro ro
~D ItO
N N
un un
nl ro
N N
z ~~
F .~-7 b N
cn a
Ha no
X O N t~
W (n .-1
Z
O O O
H O O
F o0
a .+ .i
'J \,\
a N N
oN rou
~ N O O
In .7 NN
z
~ rol
a °o
H ~ JJ
H A R
a a •.~~ E
au zu
N
.°~ a, a, v
w •.a E .-~
E N ~ ~
• V1N 01
N
.°~' a o. v
E•~roo
~fnNA
• 1(1 N Oi
N
°: aaaNi
+-1 •rl E rti
E N FI .C
•M NOO
•-1 M .-1
O
O O
1!1 O O O
N O Ifl
.1l1N0
•i ~ ~ M
M N b \
\ \ \ N
•Oi •a E ~-Oi
••+ r+ ro o
ENU.c
•-1 ••1 •i 01
Q
N
ro
z u
l
Q
F N
t 4
lbgU
~
Wµ ~
~
l.>4 -1 1
J W
U +
u ro u ro.-.
[~ wrooo
wsaau
• v
v
1 1 1 1 1 W:I 1 1
H
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
c
v w
M Oi
l
O
~~Wb'01,1 N1J M
r+u u u~.~ u ro u ~+ ~'
oaaa.vvada •+
0 0 0 0 •.1 •.~ O l1 0 tYl
U U U W W U ro U oD
f7
•-1 1!1 I!1 N N M N V' N ' 1`
CN
.H
w
~
N
~
N O W
.I
'
O
Ni
~
W
H - O
j
1 }
L
•'+
~ O
oaaawroaa
ia o
p
UUVWW UN ~ o
.
U .,y
.i IA. IA N N N N M N ro
~ v
Id
a
O a
a a
J~ 0
W
LI ~.1V'Ob 11 Nib a
oaa~
~
ma a
ro
.
i
a ,a ~
00 00•.i+i 040
U
U U W W U U N
•-1N 00b sl•N bsr Ul ~
u ...1
"'1 a
.y A
O~
O~ l ~
~ ~
W
000000 O O hh
pp ~
•n
V1001l100000 O N
N IA Vl N N 00 O O N ~ y
•-1NNbPtlb .1~ .-~
~~
~
H°°u
u ro
s
+
m o i
a
0000
~
v
~ ~
O3
i0
•
' ~
auuuwwurou a
.-I .~ '-I .-1 .1 .-1 .-i .~ .i o a
O
1-1 .•~
U
H AC
)~
a wv
b
u
uooro
,
H ~ ~
w
~
~ a
A,
p
K .
i i
~
~
w
ro
µ~
µ
fx g
E W
A,q
Ab+
1 '
w
~
c
•.+ N y
X
tl ~r
Gv, a N o
~
3 ~ ro
wrorcrooro
+
'yw v+ r
HUOVimwx.a
11-37
'd
N N
• A A
A
E m
~ N E
a
m
~ u
a
u w
•-1 N
Ad endum: 3/92
N
0
'-1
O
a~
C
ro
N
v
G
a
N
O~
ro
a
M
O~
.-/
co'~
N
V
Q
H
sd
a
ui
U
N
a
0
N
1. Planning and engineering;
2.~Clearing and removal of exotic
3. Compartmentation of beach fill
9. Procurement of sand fill;
5. Unload and grade deposited soil
6. Construct beach access walkways
vegetation;
areat
and revegetation; and
and structures.
It is recommended that the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements be .
updated to account for the scheduling and program changes discussed
above.
Traffic Circulation Facilities
The current 5-Year .Schedule of Improvements (i.e. 1990-1995)
includes an annual local street resurfacing program in the amount
of $90,000 per year. According to the Village Public Services
Director, the programmed amount should be increased to $60,000 to
account for increased costs of the program. It is recommended that
the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements be updated to account for this
increase.
A detailed analysis of current Village roadway conditions was
completed as part of the support analyses accompanying the pro-
posed 92-1 Comprehensive Plan amendments. A copy of this analysis
is included as ATTACHMENT B, herein. Based upon current LOS
Standards, all roadways within the Village are .currently operating
at acceptible service levels. Further, recently completed
improvements to Prosperity Farms Road are projected to 'adequately
accommodate service needs through buildout of the Village.
Based upon the above, it is concluded that the Village Director
of Public Services may issue additional Statements of Adequate
Public Facilities Determination during FY 1992, provided that the
conditions and standards in Chapter 2, Section VI.C.2.e.(1),
Section VI'.C.4 and the LOS for capital road facilities have been
met. .However, the Village is currently updating the Traffic Cir-
culation Element of the _Comprehensive Plan. Upon its completion,
the Village should ,a gain review current and projected traffic
conditions to verify the above conclusions.
Other Comprehensive Plan E]ements
The Future Land Use, Housing and Coastal Zone Management elements of
,the current Village Comprehensive Plan }lave no scheduled capital
improvements in the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements. Furthermore, no
additional improvements are presently recommended.
'i'he cumulative effects of proposed revisions to the 5-Year Schedule
of Improvements are displayed in TABLE 11-10, which is a proposed
revision to TABLE 11-2 of the Village Comprehensive Plan.
Addendum: 3/92
11-38
' 11.4.1.2.3 Rev
enue Forecasts
The current distribution of general fund revenues is illustrated in
TAB1,E 11-10, based on the most current published Comprehensive
Annual Fiscal Report (FY 1990/91). It is evident from TABLE 11-11,
in comparison to TABLE 11-1, that the Village has become more
dependent on ad valorem tax revenues than in the past. Currently, ad
valorem tax revenues comprise 95.15% of general fund revenues,
whereas the FY 1986/87 rate stood at 40.22%.
Most of the other revenue sources, including Local Taxes, Licenses/
Permits, Intergovernmental and Miscellaneous Sources have declined
accordingly. Service Charges, Fines and Forfeitures, and Inte,•est
all have increased slightly.
If the above trends continue, it can be concluded that the Village
will have to increase its reliance on local revenue sources to fund
any capital improvements. Revenue and Expense projections for the
Village General Fund, based on the extension of past trends, are
presented in TABLE 11-10. Revenues are projected at an annual rate
based upon the "moving average rate" of the three previous fiscal
periods. ,
Current capital outlay is approximately 5.63% of total annual
General Fund expenditures. Assuming thaC this rate is maintained,
General Fund capital outlay potential projections are presented in
TABLE 11-13.
A summary of capital expenditures by fiscal year is presented in
TABLE 11-14. Fiscal year tot:~is are as follows:
FY 1991 - $ 61,000 I
FY 1992 - $ 87,500
FY 1993 - $ 87,500
FY 1994 - $ 71,000
FY 1995 - $ 89,000
Post: FY 1995 - $1 31,000
General Fund capital outlay potential projections, pursuant to TABLE
11-13, indicate that khe Village should have the capability to
finance each of the proposed programs without having to resort to
alternative funding sources.
1
11-91 Addendum:3/92; Rev.:4/92
• ~ -
TABLE 11 11
General Fund Revenues - 1990/91
• Revenue (j)
Category Subtotal Total % of Total
Ad Valorem Taxes 2,727,983 45.15
Local Taxes
Sales and Use 169,924
Franchise (1) 823,015
Utility (2) 425,069
Road and Bridge 11,496
Licenses and Permits(3) 1,429,504 23.67
273,703 9.53
Intergovernmental
State Shared (4) 926,092
County Shared(5) 89,819
Service Charges 1,012,911 16.78
Gen. Gov't. 966
Public Safety 1,356
Physical Env't.(6) 171,911
Cult./Rec.(7) 100,886
Zoning/Annexation 2,700
Fines/Forfeitures 277'819 4.60
Courts 79,543
Library 5,062
other 26,318
Interest °105,923 1.75
146,626 2,q2
Miscellaneous 67,316 1.11
TOTAL 6,091,785 100.00
Notes:
1. Electricity, telephone, gas, cable TV and water -
2. Electricity, gas, fuel oil and propane '
3. Professional and occupational licenses, building permit$
and other
4. Cigarette tax, state revenue sharing, beverage licenses,
local government one-half cent sales tax, Community
Development assistance grant, recycling grant and EMS grant
5. County school guazds, County occupational licenses, municipal
vehicle rebate, System Enahncement Program
6. Refuse collection, grounds maintenence and other
7. Library and Marina revenues
' Source: •Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (9/30/91)
i
Addendum: 3/92; Rev.:9/92
11-42
1
1
TADLE 11-12
Revenues Vs. Expenditures
FY 1982 - Fy 1996
FY Revenues($)(1) Expenditures($)(2)
Actual
1982 3,298,814 3,189,675
1983 3,502,367 3,104,233
1984 4,035,924 3,426,135
1985 9;179;404 3,999,642
1986 4,323,555 3,820,594
1987 4,780,657 4,578,191
1988 5,330,521 5,103,143
1989 5,929,454 5,582,360
1990 6,260,165 6,197,176
1991 6,041,785 5,911,275
Proiection(2)
Expense eo
Revenue Ratio(%)
96.5
88.6
84.8
95.8
81.4
95.7
95.7
94.1
98.9
97.8
1992
1993 6,307,629 5,922,29 3 95.0
6,446,392 '"6,124,072 95
0
1994 6;517,302 6,191,437 .
95
0
1995
1996 6,686,752 6,352,419 .
95.0
6,820,487 6,479,463 95.0
1. Taxes, Licenses and Permits, Intergovernmental, Service
Charges, Fines and Forfeitures and Miscellaneous Revenues
2. General Government, Public Safety, Public Services,
Cultural and Recreational Services and Other expenditures
3. Revenues projected to increase at an annual rate based
upon the three year moving average rate of the three
previous fiscal periods
Sources: -Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (9/30/91;
North Palm Finance Department; LRM, Inc. (4/92)
Addendum: 3/92; Rev.: 4/92
11-93
TABLE 11-13
' ,
General Fund Capital Outlay
' :Projections
Total Capital Outlay
FY Exnenditures($)(1) Potentlai(S)(2)
1992 5,:992,293 337,363
1993 6,124,072 344,785
1999 ~ 6,191,937 398,578
1995 ~ 6,352,419 357,641
1996 6,479,463 364,799
Notes:
1. From Table 11-12
' 2. 5.63% of Total Expenditures
' Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/92, 4/92 '
Addendum: 3/92p Rev.: 4/92
1
11-49
1
TABLE 11-19
Summary Of Proposed Capital Expenditures
Project FF Fiscal Year Expenditures (j)
Descriotion* 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 _POSt 1995
Resurface
Streets 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000/yr.
Toxic Waste
Pub. Education 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000/yr.
Coop Drainage
Study A/8 25,000
Master Drainage
Study A%B 45,000
Master Recreation
Plan 28,000
Lakeside Park
Erosion Program 26,500 26,500
C-17 Erosion
Program .,10000
TOTAL 61,000 87,500 87,500 71,000 89,000
* - From Table 11-9
Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/92 '
1
11-45 Addendum: 3/92
1
1.9.1.4 ATTACHMENTS
11.4.1.4.A Executive•SUmmary of the document entitled
Recreational Needs Assessment, prepared for the Village
of North Palm Beach on February, 1991 by Sunbelt Research
Associates and a copy of the document entitled "Report of
the Recreation Advisory Board to the Village Council on the
results of the Recreation Survey conducted for the Village
by Sunbelt Research Associates".
11.4.1.9.B Excerpt from the document entitled V_illaae of
North Palm Beach Florida .Proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendments First Applications For The Year 1992 prepared for
the Village of North Palm Beach on December, 1991 by Land
Research Management, Inc. (NOtet The Attachment contains
the Traffic Impact Analysis section of the 92-1 support
documents.)
1
11-q6 Addendumt 3/92