2014-86 Supports PBC membership in Treasure Coast Regional Planning CouncilRESOLUTION 2014 -86
A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF
NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, STRONGLY OBJECTING TO RECENT
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS TO WITHDRAW PALM BEACH COUNTY FROM THE
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND TO REQUEST
MEMBERSHIP IN THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
AND STRONGLY SUPPORTING THE COUNTY'S CONTINUED MEMBERSHIP
IN THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL; PROVIDING
FOR DISTRIBUTION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR
OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners (`BOCC ") recently took
action by means of a 4 -3 vote on October 7, 2014 authorizing its staff to research all necessary
steps to withdraw Palm Beach County ( "County ") from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
( "TCRPC ") and to request membership in the South Florida Regional Planning Council ( "SFRPC ") in
spite of opposition expressed at the meeting by municipal representatives and others; and
WHEREAS, the County has been a member of the TCRPC since 1976; and
WHEREAS, during that lengthy tenure, the staff at the TCRPC has become acutely aware of the
issues and concerns of the County as well as of the thirty -eight (38) municipalities located
therein as they relate to growth management, transportation demands, water concerns and
general land use planning; and
WHEREAS, there is little, if any, evidence that the SFRPC has the same depth of understanding
of the issues that the County and its municipalities are facing; and
WHEREAS, the strategic policies found in the TCRPC Regional Policy Plan differ greatly from
those found in the SFRPC Regional Policy Plan; and
WHEREAS, the County and the municipalities have incorporated many of the TCRPC policies
into their comprehensive plans which guide their growth patterns and such plans which would
require revision if the change to the SFRPC is achieved; and
WHEREAS, many municipalities located in Palm Beach County are involved in long term planning
activities with the TCRPC which would be rendered meaningless if this change were to occur; and
WHEREAS, the minimal reasons supporting change found in the back -up documentation for the
agenda item and the discussions at the October 7, 2014 meeting centered around saving money in
the form of reduced membership fees to be paid to the SFRPC as opposed to the TCRPC; and the
diverse interests of the counties comprising the TCRPC; and
WHEREAS, since County ad valorem tax dollars are used to pay for the membership in the
TCRPC and are derived from all those persons and entities owning property in the County, each
property owner is paying for this membership and deserves a voice in this abrupt move taken by
the County with very little, if any, sound reasoning as to why such a move would benefit all local
governments located in the County; and
Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS, long term relationships forged through more than thirty -five (35) years of working
with the TCRPC and the in -depth understanding the TCRPC staff has of the County's and the
thirty -eight (38) municipalities' land use issues should not be discarded without substantial and
powerful reasons, which to date have not been clearly articulated by the members of the BOCC.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM
BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing "whereas" clauses are hereby ratified and incorporated herein.
Section 2. The Village Council of the Village of North Palm Beach strongly objects to
recent action taken by the Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners to withdraw
Palm Beach County from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and to request
membership in the South Florida Regional Planning Council. The Village Council strongly
supports the County's continued membership in the TCRPC.
Section 3. The Village Council hereby requests that this resolution be sent directly to the
Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council and all municipalities in Palm Beach County.
Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
(Village Seal)
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
Page 2 of 2
MAYOR
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
committees of the LMS, and is the primary mechanism and forum for exchanging information
and mobilizing the vast expertise and resources of the community.
Highlights:
• Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator for Pahn Beach County (PBC), facilitated the first of two
Working Group meetings for 2013.
• Ken Roundtree, LMS Chair + Director of Operations for Northern Palm Beach County
Improvement Distric(, welcomed the Working Group and thanked our host Ralph Wall, City of
West Palm Beach.
• Ralph Wall, West Pahn Beach City provided comments on behalf of the City and welcomed us to
his facility
• Kelvin Bledsoe discussed the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program grant
• The PPL list Was mentioned and explained by Kelvin Bledsoe
• The project submission date window was listed. The window will be open for new projects from
October 7, 2013 and closes Nov 6, 2013
• Kelvin Bledsoe, The Local Mitigation Strategy Coordinator provided a slide show on the LMS
project and history and stressed the fact that for a City to be eligible to receive funds from FEMA
through the LMS process that they needed to be active members of the LMS. Active membership
was defines:
I) Participation of the representative or officially designated alternate(s) in three (3) out of four
(4) Steering Committee meetings where plan revisions will be addressed;
2) For the General Membership the participation requirements dictates that all
jurisdictional representatives attend both Working Group Meetings.
3) Consecutive absences will be cause for disqualification for the LMS, subject to
appeal and review by the LMS Chair.
4) All rights and privileges will be tenninatcd during a period of disqualification and
formal reapplication;
5) Participation in subcommittee meetings may he substituted for Steering Committee
attendance in meeting the 3 out of 4 rule pending approval by the Chair;
6) While suspended, member cannot submit projects for review.
• A committee was established to write and update the LMS plan for 2015.
• Lists were put out for individuals who wanted to serve on the LMS Steering Corrunittee, the
Evaluation Committee, or Working Group.
Page 2 of 3
251
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
* The ucxt st, ing cuumirdae mcetir&g (Sepiumbcr 18, 2013 - i'Hb79MIoy 1:41af7$ &C1par11 Ruiiding)
;W [?4,aluuticn commitree (Nov4mmher 7, 2* 13 - Lnaorgency Menaganarl bui[ {ling) dwc!% W,;Te
almounuexl.
+ Addilioml mecring amwtmwnenLt rrtclaMed the dales nF dko Dmotnber Siaaging artmmittee {
December 11, 2013)..Lnd uccolib'.f I.MS Working irnolk 1+teetirr� (Deucmher,t, n 1 3 - 1CtSi7 i]
Royal Palm Brach Blvd, Royal Palm Bomb - 11):01] Rrn,j
■ 'No phair cxplaimd that each member tret.,d J to have rin allema i4e assiprad
■ C1rlr rrext LMS Cimup weriog will liuve a gueal %peakex
* TRAIN ITG' REM fIYl.} ER-S iWnup at: http: jFrPe. ll.Drit] rdlNastcr .nrWjypOloi!ili&rnj.ns x
"00 yowr mitilAriglij qn." worLsha , November 14, 20 1.3 4.04 p,ra M4Lrtin C.oi`uly
I°uMix Ufcty Camp[ex, SLuarr, [-'L
guhm 41 Cd by
Kelvin Blc(Lwe, LMS Cuoul.irrator
A.pprovcd by
Ken Roundtree- LMS Sle4ring Culmiaktee dsair
Page 3 of 3
252
ancr� r
4rk7tylF
Atgendecs:
*
Pairu 6taell C�,wrfy
ULM
*
City of ilkl I-e Gladc
w
f own al'iiriny Bree=s
-
Town of G7oad LAC
■
City of f]elrap f5wtli
•
Town of Gteo Ridge
■
cry ofGrmlwC s
+
Toum of I t1thinnd
Beach
-
Iulvn of'Hypolwo
CSiynf NLokce
Ivwn of BrinyBfu- ra
+
Town of I Ake! Clarke
Shwa
*
C'i3y of Bnyn,u 11h Beach
Absent:
* Cily 44Al l"lis
Town ONUL s FUM
+ Town of Lesko Park
■ Town afSouth Pa hn
Bnell
+ PAITM mach OCRIaty
rkc
Prdm IICadi ShetiffLn
OFf"
* ATklc cu Red CrM8
• Palm Bmlt Cuunly
WRICr RCU*Lfct�s
• Palm I+aacll COnoLy
PLB"iog, lump- and
Buitding
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
!,1145 Working Group
Meeting Summary
December d, 2013
Royal Palm Beach
• TOwn of Lnolaoa
* Toms of Palen N;xh
* Village of Palm
Spring.cl
■ My Of5nul11 Flag
* Viltarge of Wclliuglan
b TMM oflupilet
* Nacllrern Patol Beach
Cmm,Y lmprov=cnl
uisLTeci
* lay &n Trail
lmpmvennenr DiHtrict
• Village of "l. PRIM
Read
• &Mh I` ida Walcr
lY3na @k,"n1 UasuNu
* Palrn lkrach Cmicily
aePerllnenl uflleakh
w Village 4Tl:qucsL2
Village uPGulf
• down of Pa Lm Bcach
shorn
Tcnvn ofMauslapan
* 'Fowo -Df PBzns Tleach
Snares
■ Lynn lJoiverslly
r` flwrda Ailiagtie
UuivorsiLy
■ Innllll Beach Staid
Cal legs
V
a Lrrban League Of f l:m
[}tw-h Conmty
■ Glcwnoxe
■ WesL$wle C'RA
Cily-of flout IL94CWL
C'ity -Of! Lice Wnrllr
■ City of Palhl Rwdl
UnDICOB
■ City urRiasura Beaell
* 'l'cnm Of UgalbWhoc
Urwxx
* I'mm of llaverhilI
r Taun nCJuno J)eaell
* 'I'mm of Mlviouk A
P$rk
■ 'I.uwn of i]orais Rikipr
■ Cily of WCSL Palm
amch
■ Town itf JM3jj r hills
calla ny
B3 ckground:
The LMS W0Aing Group is -co inpri.wl of lira full body ofthv INS, rgimsui ing a bmW sruss
section OF public sector and pTivatC soetnr organizations kind individuals, brLa Odirlg III[, general
PUbfig, Vu Working Group scncs as an mnhre]Ia organization for cnnrdioating all mitigation
programs acid ac[ivdics, supplies the slaiiigg alai expertise for the d0ding Mill ad it ❑c
Page 10f 3
253
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
catYIniiftt>es of file LMS, and is the vVh wry mecisanism and forum for exolianhing info imldk)Ll
and mo-biiiziq the vast uxpertisc aLxi resso-t nws or0w oommnnuy_
Itigillights:
r kelvin Bledsnm, I.M8 Cooddusntur rdr Palm HCACII County (PBC), facilitated 117c Dommbur 4,
2113 Working ?irmp rmming.
■ Kcn Roundiree, INS Civur a Dirm<w -of Opeta[iuns for Northern Palen Beach ('aunty
1mpmvemanl Disarm WCICOirsed the Workmn [group and llrauked our hoar, Chris marsh and the
Viltagc of 1{oyai 13 RIM Deaoh
r Chris Marsh, Viilago of Royal Palen Buell - provlt d M=rnb i ou Behalf of [he City and
wcicnmod us ra his facility
1afY'Cinldtsurg, PIa,Iniog Manager for jibe mvision orJ;mergency ManagclnQnl was Inlroduccd
Kolv.in Bledsoe discussed Funding opportunities wish the Rcsidaival Comtrudion Miligalion
G rats[ Prc)pa,n.
i -De PPL list was mvicwpd mekidu jed and explained by Kel Yin Bledsoe_ The lief will Ire acrublxx3
tti mtnove- pmimts Ilim are either being funded by tocai cities or am no lt,ogu Yalta. C'onrd[natinR
w[lI be mado %wil h cities thal have pmrocls on rho list. The list will be [wised 1 +y January 31, 2014
and sen[ to Florida Division of &mergearcy Management.
■ The pmject subinies[nn date windows tivere listed aPd A%- ussed. 11 was determined Llmi DCM
wnuW provide all cil[es wish the evnluation wrsrk kneel Io awsisl Ihem sabmitt[ug steamer prDJCC1S
P-ph -";.
* Future nwvting dates of the StcxxinR C'otnmithe and working group meetings for X014 morn,
discussed and 1 istetl.
■ LMS update was discussed with rime 6ims listed ao when portions or t[le pieu would be raw iced
or up-�Let-md_
■ It was discumd Thal the working group lilmtings Were mandatsuy and 1!sat Iimsc cities dull hove
inimxi two in a row would he cmnlualed slid pomible have any pmjecls they have 1130 PPL. list
renwYod.
■
711e LMS reviainns committoe was nne"tioued by ben me_
■ Jorhn Bonne from the Village of Wel[ingtrnl was pmented a W Ht me Dapot gift ccrrificma For
11is years of service: id Use LMS commillees 11501 lie scrycd on fo include scrvirLg as 11W UhrLir OF
Ilse LMS evEdinktiou commit" JOW1 wi[I hta rotiriifg 111i5 monih. He will be misSod.
• The Chair explained thaI moh memberr moodcd in have mi allmkate aa9ig73cci
'Graining appartililltles wer4 presented tp Sh19 9MR11}. TLme iofertMcd [o disaroter IraLHii"
should go to : Id {v;litrac,flai lckpllisasfer.or lr�rllntrinf-m-r lsiA
Page 1-of 3
254
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Submitted by
Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator
Approved by
Ken Roundtree, LMS Steering Committee Chair
Page 3 of 3
255
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
to .S i
(.*2D ` L1V>tS Working Group
Meeting Summary
December 5, 2012
l'uwn of l antuna — Town Hall
Attendees:
* Palm Beech Crlauty
■
Town al'Larium
■
realm lte■ch County
1XV
■
Tflwn of Man$4Nia
Firc Rescue
Oily rrf AtlentiB
Park
■
Rahn death 3hrriie s
+ Cily of lirllcGladc
■
OeacH Cit rof Pahukee
MICE
■ City of Boca Rai411
r
Town ofQcean Ridge
■
Amreriann Red cr(K&
+ Town of Briny $roan
r
Two of Palm Ewmh
■
Noeih— Pallrl 1 #e�talr
* Town of Claud LAC
•
City of Palm Beach
County Improvc[nent
+ Cily of Delmy iirxiah
t` *meats
l),8IraC[
■ Towo oFG len Ridgc
*
Village of Palm
■
Indian DO
■ City of tj(vwW6W5
46rig5
Jmprovement dis[Nrl
* Town of lulfstrcani
■
Ci[y of Riviera U*nh
■
NIm Flwh Cokinty
■ Tom) of 1 laverhlal
+
Ckyof Sou[h 13ay
Wa[a Resovnc4
* Towo or]- Ughlak
■
Town of Saulh Palen
■
Nlrn Beach C =ormty
Elra4h
]mach
Atannirq. Zming,, and
* Tnwo of Frypol"o
Wlage of Wellinglon
building
* '11'0wii ofJuno Brach
*
City ofWCEt PRIM
•
Palm Bach (�uuoty
a Town efl..ake Clack:
Dead
fkPW 11elrt orIi4mm
Shores
*
Town ofLnkshalclice
+
VIIlap ofl'equasts
■ TPwnorl Ake NA
Cravn
*
Vi u4p Or Ra!gLI paim
+ City of lake Word'n
*
Town of 9upita:r
peach
+ City oFBavuwa Scsch
Absent:
■ Town bf JWPller Inlol ■ Town of palm Beach Villgtge of NIV6 Nlnt
Colon) slims Beath
Vil lagn uri�otf
Baekgroun4
[he LT++tS Working Group is oomprkwd of the full body of the LMS, mpresenting a hmRd cross
section of public sector al-4 pTivalc sector organizations and individuals, iucluditig the gcnetal
public. The Working (iripup s n-V5 as an umbrella organization for cni rdinatirlg all mitigation
pm8rf3ms ars{i activities, supplies the staffing and expertise ror the sWnding and ad hoe
cort mitres u{ the LMS, and is the primary mechanism and lorum Or rnhanging infvmiatir211
and mubilixing life vast expertise acid rmS ur"s of lht camrnuaity.
Page t of 2
256
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Highlights;
• Jme Spearo, LMS Ct mrdinutur For PAril Hrmlr C'n i% I1'BC} lkililated Lhe wound vF Iwo
WGFkinb Group mwinp for 201-2
■ ucbbic Manor, !'own Manager, weicoined the Working Cmip and highlighted many greut
aspects of the town,
+ Informatim was provided on cunrnr HMO, Wding from TS Debbie, AIL applicants with
prujeals h5ted on the most current Project Prioritization Lkt (PPL) arc siblc to apply thmat h
egrarro For IfMGP Tier III funds, Submission dtadlinc is February 15, 2013.
■ Tha updAled Nr ect Priodlizalion Last Q11 I,) will be rcicmcd by Dw mbeT 20 and can 6e Pound
ih the LMS Comer.
r 'There ore currently I� midgation pmjecls ongoiug in Palni Bdiw t County From Frsncc.9, ,Ieanne.
Trilm. and Vay.
■ Kemal jiLrisdicliom ineludiog Town uC Juno Flew-},, City- pf &oyarron Bead% ViIIW of
Wollintton, and Ciry PCC-MU acres briefed t1le WoPking Gruup on the status rFPtheir mitigation
proj"ts.
■ PBU Divisioir of Enrergerrcy Monagemem has !'ands svai Inkrle rrqm the Stale Howeland Smuriry
Gmnt Prugrwn (81 i13GP') for a parri at plan update, It was identi Pied thel tite bell use for the funds
spay 6e Far a portion of the LMS Plan 5ertiorr III - Hazard and Vidrivabi I ity Anakysis, Project
tirork will be owlipleted by Lhc end of March 2U 13.
+ rtwt red SpeAkoa, Pim Mac'1Cie — Stmrrtll Wrida Winer Mannemem District discussed the
oamplex kature 1)f flood events and the mvromenr of water througloout tho region. Ms_ MAe'Kie
is avaiMIc to spcRk rocommunity orgarizeiot,s, municipal officials, "well as elected offu:jals
on these complex lupies_ Please uuntwt Ms. Mfw,Kjrp ar the following to schfdule a trusting:
Pam Msu'Kir (56i) 682 -2655 yr pMEg. iQasfwnitLgpy
■ 7'jltAlNlN(; REMINDER - Slgampat: htiu:# 1t�. 11��r3daJisasrer .nrgJtrpe�gpjnfnrrrF.A�uY
G -J93 Mftlgairlorl for Emergency Managers, 7a noary 30 -31-
Broward County EOC
6-278 6errefit -Cast Analysis., Entry Level Training, March 6 — 7 -
Pairn Beach County FOG
c: 890 -UPS Hurricane Resilient CDminunrty Planning and mealy 1,
March 19 — March 28 — Iirowrird County EDC
Submiacd by
Jesse Spearo, LMS Cpk)rO11Li31M-
257
PagezDf2
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
irN 14'rnr r�s
u��rAy.i
Y
F
Palm Beach County
Public Safety Department
Division of Emergency Management
Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS)
Steering Committee Meeting
Call to Order; Welcomellfitroductions - Chair
Last Meetliag Summary
LM5 Program update - Jeff Goldberg
+ Meeting Frequently changes
a Roberts Rules of Order
* Grant funding opportunities
Projeok Prioritization List (PPL) Update
iie LMS Times
;■ Upcoming Training
;.4 Next meeting date
258
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
pains Beach County
U[Visian of Emergency Managernant
LNIS Steering ContmittL -e Meeting Mtnutes
Weduesclny, September i0; 2014 -1 LOO a.m.
DEM Coufar4nceR001H.3
Attcudecs:
Ajma Jamel - DSM Disaster Consultants
Rcbuca Creighton Delray Medical Cetiter
C'nrlc7s c' eno - Ommacm, _
David Rotor - Jupiter
i]cbbie R-Rn}o - Lantana
Ken RoLiidtree - Northam P13C 11T*. Dist
A Ivill Jp}ttYBpn - Pelmkee
Uyen L7aU - Royal Palrh Bmtk
_ Kelvin 13WNoc -
rr, T f' Ahr— - �
Karla White-- City of Lake Worth
PLUS Wiscr PBcp'L&13
Jennifer Berkirwn -
ical
11) Call to Order: Weleonse.+ mmduetions- K-pn Roundtrae, LMS Choiirrnan
• Kcn Rokncllrcc called meeting to order
• I ntivductions of all attendeue
2) L$at 14Mpeting Summary
■ A review ort11�: 1,MS StCQdrLgCommitteeulinute& [r4311 June 4, 2014 wars OwWljc led
for accuracy.
■ TWO ofvm#iorts mmlc_ Bullet 6, sewed sentence c3saiYg Ixrb] ttP Scum Rolla 7,
third sente,YCc, olwngc suspLmsc to response-
■ See Alrarr<rmem ! ?bl'ee ing Sawm Pry C'omected Cory
+ All other iLems appmlood from CItG ImA mating held on Jtnic 4, 2014.
3) LM Program Update -Jeff Goldberg
• Meeting Rrequesitly Changes - wilt meet quarterly and keep time of t 1 101) a.m, -
■ Roberts Rules of Order- will failow guidelines arid ruies Ior t4ir and onlcrly
'Tw0ngs.
Rooluiion - Jc f}. spoke with Vanessa at the State and fepnde chat Modiii tipas al-C
minor. Tht ma lust ion will be condncted today or iunkirrow and the State will adviw
Mien pa - "cd, We now have 38 municipalities- See Auaclrmmg 2 Rexalamrirrrr Draft
tJT challgQs hi rod. This will go before Elie Bggrd by DDwmbcr 11 x . Svnic of the
rhangcs inc]Wc using the word hig local mkigatirm w .9- unified arKI 9pciling out the
woTd FEMA. When the State notifies Jelfol- awpgroval he will send to all 1ulemk".
'talc resLltition will then be st1tt to the StA u w d FEMA will generate a letter, At Iliac
Page I o f 3
259
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
L�J
point, vac will hauc an approvod LMS whicl5 goes io tltit Board. Em -wotai rcuvlutiom
ore Timli tl by mid-Navcnilrt:r-
o Motion to accept charges and addie,g awtNrrtent - all in Favor- motion
passed.
o The quest ion was raised: What is required (f f X98 Districts and how do we
incorporate them into LMS? Metrai,tn oflhc cannmiQcz are advised of
uipt atcs. Ken Todd might be able to rtnt%out to the districts since lie is
workb,g with mappir& Jeff will k,1tloirn c1465sations from the Stato.
4) Grant FundiugOppertunRWg- Kelvin Uledsae
Kelvin spoke with the State a f Florida and Owir rnil igalion person is adv ising that
mcmica are available, Discussion from the &qoup was Il:W i 's diffieull to obtain
funding after applying. 1 I's not wort h flit % s*Ju - it lakes rttoni hs. However, the
process has been stmamt'uied. The State is k open to ussist - let's requnt they atteiid
our December 10"' Working Cn%auf Lodi -jcuyy now pmcalurm and give infonmti0ij
on grants, )cmnifer 13eckjuan notes C:ummualily Block Granis are availahk. Kelvin
wi]I devetop gnestions for the Slaw prior to Iheir arrival end will obtain additiaiwl
information on funding -
S) Pr@jeet PrloritiznUon List (PPL) Update
• The Evaluation Conlirtittee met and ev:p4wetl Village: of royal Palm Beach - 31
projects,
City of Gree,la:rm rerwyca sumo prDjocts - now at 71, They have witil Oetober 7 "'
to suhmil - Rri optn Window of 30 days- 'Phis is chaLcd by Carlos Cedt:,Sb t,f
Greemacres.
6) Quarterly L141 S Timres - Kelvin Bledsoe
■ The LMS Times is an opportunity for munieipatites to highlight their xNovvmvnts.
Kelvin uragesi Fulnbcrs w submit articles-
■ Sidowtc: Hcalth Care Industry reins are needed - Jeffrez lml oul LLI Rehe" FrOrm
Doiray and Join James frown PSC M-adical Society was in altoidanct, He intmduood
himself.
+ Jeaniki Seck,nsn froin I]RU advised shit rain $ubMit Mn �iple, us wall as Nug Wisp
from VZ&B. Pictures are welootne to include; in the TA9 Times- Tliv next
pubticatioil is Oaohar 1" and submissions arc: Ti =Axl by October to
■ It was asked if die LM cat, he placed on l 4 wehsitc. f ommlly, the Admin Fuaancc
secMioii handles the webcite. However, talc P1+1nning vx6onwill sPuon be h)Vilargeof
Updating tine website.
7) Upcoming Training - Kelvin Bledsoe
■ }uaa is an excellent HenofhslC'ost Analysis class ot'fered by the State - Jeff will gut
more in Formal ion for [be grotil).
■ S>~WMD hosting CFM (Cenifed F3u(fd Plait Mailuger) exam (4 Ix5ut) At Ellwrct
oflFiscs. Thcy will sand Kelvin die enjail to distribute,
page 1 01 -3
260
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
S} (�nc- �tlon�+�'amments
■ Food zone quoqt ions came up arwl thc7, can be addrex!x[ to Doug. There is a(rnfitsiorl
with the 100 y"r flood phns, as well as the low -risk olvi high -risk. t)hm cart
fonvaLrd call- to iho Goad mfonnation hwlutik-- }ye awn ittu]TpQrtw the hotline number
into the DEM wobsite "A+Iake a Plan" information, Se mh mginc features would b-
hdpfut 10 have on the DEM wch�:ilc as well.
■ 01A.2tes by Doug inr.Nde flood zones INit are changing F+r Palm 8cach Coutily. ']'he
maps are on4e. Please look at rwvoTtiks and dirmt airy qoubliuns to the flood plan
hotline. Kelvin will distribute Ilio hotline number as inquiries ar�sc, The nieeiings are
tonight in DelleGlwdc withreeitleatls,
+ P13C not owacnt with the flood maps. SWN!D did ji(PI model CSI flood stQgAm.
'there is all appeals process of 90 days and FEMA will f cdd ms each appeal. There is
a 6 mmnth window wW then maps will >x; final. 65,000 are going in - wsidenis will
need to aNuiru flood insurance_ 35,000 do riot tooth tIoucl pWns. South Counly
areas seems In 1'm4 the wianers - Cireenaures, Palm 5priarg�;, and the Acreage all look
good_ Ilnlx,t:; Will after 1980 shki -vld be elevated and okay, Km Tcrdd can he
contacted for assistance-
* More Wo-rknig Group htmtiogs arc desu+ed. We will conduct 4 meet higs pl�r yc &r.
r We w ill k*Cp tltc Sleeril�P, Co MM4tce moat uig t ime of I i ;I)o a.m since it may
eorifina with DEM team meetings on occasion-
+ Our LMS meetings are -of high cal iber xid we thank al i 0-tiro incmbers.
CRS questions eupii u5 rc�-ccrtifitatlnn, flood wanting systemce,, Acd!L, And
criordinatirg of act M les arc now handled by Brian Hw ley, DEM.
+ Annual conference meeting is sct for February 2015 iii Orlando_ if the group waijrIn
prLqent a husi practice panel, plcaso advise Jeff_
9) Next McTIing 1 }ate: ccrnb4r3, 201 ,
Adjourunirnt. 12; i3 p.m
261
Page 341fI
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Palm Beach County
Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS)
Steering Committee Meeting
r DIY 6
a Call to Order and Irltroduetions
a Prior Steering committee meeting notes
+ GOV2r W'S Hurricane Conference presentation
+ LMS Evaluation Committee - Updated PPL
Iw Funding SGuroes
Future committee Meeting Dates
■ LMS Plan Update - Schedule
■
LMS Tlmes
;a New LMS i2i�ViQW Tool
iy Ques#ionslComments
ia Adjownrnent
,* Upcoming Training
262
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
LMS Steering C'ownlitce
ecting SUhilmAry
C J v ne d, 2014
Attendees:
Andrea Jame[- DSM DiaasterCaitistlltanis
Mike Rearm - FDEM
Carlos Cedeno Cheenwo'cs
David Ro tar - Ju '
Nbbie Manor =Largatlo _
*Kerr Roiindtrec- Northem PIIC Imp, Dist
Alvin Johnson Pahokee _
[_WT LcZkoyjan• l'ahn Beach State C(PTlege
MickgrouYP4:
Kcluin Dlcdsoe - F$CDEM
Jeff Goldberg PaCDEM
Nigal B akcr - IIBCFR
170UA Wise- PUCPB&Z
Fd Kcrr- South Say —
AIG-1 Ortt%;V - WCt A Palm Deach
Ralph W411 - West Palm Beach
The LMS Stu-in4g Ccrnminee serves as the Vocal Mitigation Strategy (LMS) pixogram 130814 ti3I'
Direc'Ion; thcTcfora. is (lie ltrigtgry d isk)n and pahcy body for LMS sponsored mitigatialt
aetivily. This wLannit1w roect`s oil qunrltrly basis for die purpnse ui'rcvi vying the plan aixl
idc-nlifying updale racluireirtent�,
Highlights:
IF KenRoundtree welornrxl lk grotipaul iliaiiked evayune farcoruirtg
• A. review of the LMS Stm7ing Crinunittee minutes from the March 5, 2014 Wij$
riductod for accuracy. tlnc currcclion to be made regarding rilkc ndccs.
• Kelvin DIWsuo gave an rrwervlcw his prescutation at the Gowcrnor'x Hurricane
Confer L!c in Orlando. TIw presentation wits "lntcgraf np, Climate CTMrs84 fn(o Pouf
Fmv ney I'lans." k+lr_ l3le6oa cxpl:;tinud haw this. was being aoc4mplisficd in Palm
Beach C i)unky. By integrate ig the term " -wa level rise" into on. local scxw6ng uritcria so
IN, it rids -rlaoding am1for 5c:* lxvcl. Risc we ensure the system was Lair t-u cdics t1Mt
do twi have a sca level rise imt ,
+ Mr. Bledsoe presentee !hc proposal molution for adnptfng the LMS to the commjlteE,
Alkv a great cliscris%o Pn it was cictcrmined that the term "sca lcvcl risk" would bL
rc mvcd from paragraph 4 ;i invv d already apimarod in pargrupb 1,
Good discussion was held on Or- best way to stay etcgagrd in sca level rise iistegnitipn.
■ The 11 e'L list wu hriefact rcgai -d hug the inclusin3t ut`�L pwicck submitted by the villAgD or
Royal Palin Beach. Thal project ranked 30 out of 71 with a school of65,2,
a TI-w }tram opportunities for the Pre- Dimmicr Mitigation and the FI)N d Miligatinn
Ass[AHnuc grant programs_ 13001 are duty on Juno 6, 201+t_ I]rte tai tlw watch regaircrrtonts
and tlse 9horl suspense tinie, Palm Beatclt C'owy will not be going alter eitlict- of those
grunts but will be preNi -iiog out to apply next year. lrl eddilion the Rcsidejtiiul
Curis(ruction Grant Prograto tvfts lwiofcd. Thcrc was also a disOA4s; qri 49t drveduping a
method and possible wmmitiuc for phis Ater mitigM6)n IUnding opportunities for fbte
next FY cycle_
gage I of 2
263
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
• LMS Plan update was discussed with a review of the time lines developed.
• The Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) has introduced a
crosswalk/evaluation tool to assist in updating LMS plans. That tool will be emailed with
the meeting summary.
• The Summer Edition of the LMS Times newsletter will be published July t, 2014.
Committee members are encouraged to submit photos and articles on mitigation.
• There will be a State Hazard Mitigation Plan Advisory Team webinar scheduled for June
10, 2014 from 1:00 PM — 4:00 PM. Webinar information will he emailed.
• Future committee meeting dates are as follows:
o Next LMS Working Group Meeting: June 11, 2014.
o Next Steering Committee Meeting: September 10, 2014
• The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 p.m.
Summary:
Provided by Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator
Approved by, Ken Roundtree, LMS, Chairman*
Page 2 of 2
264
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Palm Bath County
Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS)
Steering Committee Meeting
.* � s
■ Ca II to Order acrd lntr4ducti0rns
i■ Prior Steering committee meeting notes
A Sea Level Rise - Carlsse LeJeune
r■ Fending Sources
no ruture committee Meeting Dates
.4 PPL List Scrub
ry LHS Plan Update Schedule
-4 Emergency Management Plans
!41 LMS Times Article request and publishing dates
i New Members
'w Evaluation Committee
.o Questions /Cornments
-a Adjournment
:i Upcoming Tr ,91pling
265
*40-r
Attendee:
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
LMS Steering Committee
Meeting Summary
March 5, 2014
Marcos Wa fosnada - IIelle Gla4c
C:arisse Lejeune - BoythtentPum -Ji
Andrea Jar4el DSM Di ."xter cornsWtRnts
Dwayne Estelle - Lake Worth
Kolvin Bledsoe PBCT)F.M
Larry I-e"vjrinr- Palm Bcnt:ln Slate Co [loge
Dail Beasley - PBCFR
*Ken Rounditee —1` oillwm PBC Imp. List
Vicky l7elbosqu ve - 9vwlt1 Bay
Ralph Walt- Wcsl Pslm Beath
Mary Aacollso- IIelle GLulo
Carlos Codena - Greciou
David R.otar - Jupker
Alven hlohiiggn- PW10kGe
JefGoldberg - PBCOFM
Kept Todd — P13C
Doug WL%e - PUCPB&7.
1=d Kerr - Spout Roy
Vyen Dang - Royal Pilm RrnQh
Ba4 JkWund;
'The LMS Steering Ckimmittm surves as the Local MkIpLion StnA y (i.M9) proparn Board of
Direckprr�; OlurOurc, mrvcs as the primary deei %ion and ppli y body Fur LMS sponsnred
luitigadorl attivily. This aomrnOae meets ten quarterly b.ois ror IIL purpose of rcvicwing the
plan and idend fy frig updale r+xtwraments,
Wghlights'.
■ Ken Roundtrec wq:l -oirM1 evcryonc to the first Steering CO3mnittee Nl"Lt kg (iflho year
mid thaoW evveyono for owyn np, Fie had everyone introduce th"Oves.
A review oftic last LMS nwcting minutes held December I [, 2013 Was a)tx1uv%5d,
■ Carisfie Lojnur o, lh,c Assistant City Kuiager for the City of Boypton Beads, [ rov&d an
oWsAanding presentation on Sea: Level Rtae. She 8040 the putcntial a&05 and iinpws
on Palm Beach County- She a1w provided hind -oWs with Witivnal informatbon.
At the tirno of the meeting there wire lio funding oppprtunitieN evadable. However, l
rcceivud an email from the §tote with pptnilial funding upportu Hcs for tougal
wmmunitics. (tt&w)
Dear COMM Lmlty Reslllenq Network,
266
Pace 1❑Ez
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
I'd like to pass along Informatlon �cgardl#rg A CRe&T grant opportunity for voastaf we si liency efforts
funded Via NOAA- This partiquly opportunity 15 @Vallaula to resiliency Work being done along Florida's
Gulf Coast. You can revle~w the specific requirements here If you arc intiRrastpd:
httwjAkiww.grant5 -9v 1Pwppfprants lvlew•aopor tun itM_html79ML= g,13
Alpplleatiolis are due by April 11r X014, and the max awards 5i00,DDD_ Here is a short des €rlptlon
provided at the above Ilnk:
'ThP Pi�VP4�s� of Ua;, r0ko it l0SukH gram propoasfa (ram &00 a oroomoaj on9 fo rtnpfemEnf aofuailss rher arlhome
resiLerx�- ro nafwV harardandcfimeteruks though a kc A rogkvkJ, ar nalbo arnstwa k
Prr "8k%8ubak4W0 i F&SPwn13 bNs snnauncermmf skwkproAvk&, 6orte&:raipu6ke curconaes hTcmau?
oorrtmund s f e+ar�of io K+oh rising existing and fufth%risks rn Me rofiffaJ Onvrawnerrl. ir*aafruofure, kxef
g. WKr4r+kwab?B papukU na. Pr s8is rrwsf afs4 fe waq% enhance, or a�ema s human orleela2vj
riE4w k M wNdr one ar mfrs coastal JWz rd ksws cdrr he aftimsed gnxq a pirlrrrYrahk6 ro WftAMCe
k, r DUrli 4fon. cor}osrallon, DDwd Mi'ari. ;gny w OGUab4Y8li0n.'
r Fulurcexrmmkcc meetirrg dates were preumlcd-
o Next LMS Steering Comnyittee moeting. June 4, 21014.
o [text LMS Working Group MccitbT; June 11, 2014.
LMS Update was discussed with u rovicw 0IFthe, time lines developed_
■ The spring edition of the LNIS Timor rims€ctter will be published April t, 201.1.
Committee members are encourzr t to submit photos and articles an initigation.
■ It was aruiowioc that our nff�v LMS (:valualiun sub-committee Chair, is Carlas CeKlutw',
from the City of Greenaca+es_ Adttiffpu 4rbuir mcmbar wcre nand as %well.
■ ]ufC Guktberg mcl)tiorted rraining opportunities to ik group %14 highlighted nn up-
a�lrigg rnitigtrlivn doss
G393- Mitigation for Emerg&roy Mftiuigors ml the Broward EOC on March 20 an t
21, 2014. Please sign up thmup)i SERT TRAC a# it'
you hmvc trouble registering, please wrilma Gu%FtnYo Vilcbca, YB{'DEM Training
C'oorduiator at 561- 712 -6483
■ Thy OMLing was adjourned at 12;05 p.rn.
S urnmary_
Provided by Kelvin G1nd&ov, f,MS Caordinutor
Approvod by, Kcn Rciundtrur, LMS C,hainnan■
Page 2 of 3
267
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
County
Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS)
.Steering Committee Meeting
+ Gall to Order and tntrocloctloris
Prior Steering committee meeting nMes
Hazard Realignment Presentation
+ runding Sources
# Future committee Meeting Dates
LMS Plan Update
.im LMS Times
it Member Transitl -on
q QuestionsiComments
Eq Adjournment
w Upcoming Training
•:
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
H
LMS Steering Committee f�
Meeffng Summary
Dumber 11, 2013
Attendee:
David Rotas - Jupiter Dwayne Ls tcllo - Cily Of Lake Work
itaiPh Wail - Nest faire Beach Bill Johnson - FBC DEM
K4;n Roundtree- Northern ETC imp. Dist. JcfTGoklbcrg- PBC DEM
Larry Lesknvjan- Paim 13mlf Srada C-ullegr
Karla Whhc -City 0fLake Wrtih
Kelviii Bledsoe • f BC DEM
Background,
The LmS Steering Cartliilltter` Paervo as the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) prograw hcmrd of
direuom; themfort, uCrv�,s as the primary decision and policy body fns LMS gwynsored
ir4tigatkin ectiwGty. This oummittec awots on quarterly basis for ilia puTnse arreviewing the
plan Wd &ler,tifying updaleroquircmcnfs,
Highlighm:
* Kcn Roundtree we1wnml everyane t{) the ]er,k Siccairtg C'ommittcc Mccting oftk yt!a
and Ihan M everymr idpc pomFng.
lk Evcryonc introduced themnlvcs_
■ A rcvk�w of the Iasi LMS meeting held Jutra 14, 2013 was uotuJt+ctcsl,
■ Kcn diwusscd the jAGr working group maetiog, Md Junc 19, 2013, attul inforined
cvcuyoiw thaA they had a suiruitary available ofIk Iasi rnw ing and gawc uvcryone time
us i;k quesitnrss_
■ JeffGokiberg PUC DFM - rrnwrgcncy prvgrarn roordioator (Planning Section Chief)
provided H brir on the Haaani Realignment for Hazard Specific. Plans and how ih=
would be im �FFex c to tiro Lhr1S and county. He discussed tliat our alignnient is its line CDW
Iht: gyrate 4& feclaaI goverumcm and uses C trtpt herssi a Plarirtitig ❑ui &ioee 101 (C:PG
101 ) and CI'G 201 as our guides.
gage 1 of z
269
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
• Funding sources were discussed and it. Kelvin gave a presentation on potential new
funding opportunity from the state's Residential Construction Mitigation Grant Program.
• Future committee meeting dates were presented
• I.MS Update was discussed with a review of the time lines developed.
• The LMS Times newsletter is going to be restarted with a potential publishuig date of late
January 2014. There will be 4 annual issues: Winter, spring, summer, and fall. Cities
were asked to provide any stories on mitigation success that should be included in the
newsletter.
• It was announce that our LMS Evaluation sub- committee Chair, John Bonde was retiring
at the end of December and that we would select a new chair for that position in the near
future.
• A slide on future mitigation and incident management training was presented.
• LMS Steering committee members were informed that the slide presentation along with
CPG 101, and CPG 201 would be sent out to them
• The meeting was adjourned at 12:17 p..m.
Summary:
Provided by Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator
Approved by, Ken Roundtree, LMS Chairman
Page 2 of 2
270
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
a: I'
Palm Beach County
Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS)
Steering Committee Meeting
+ Call to 0 rd er a nd xn"ductio ns
Prior Working Group Meeting
June 19, 2013 r Current and Expected F=unding Sources
;a Recommendatlorws from Evaluation Panel
lip OO•
Beach County EOC w 2013 Project Priaritization Ust (PPL) Update
tw State Response to LMS Inquiries
,d Future Steering committee Meeting bates
.4 Future LMS Plan Updates
. -+ LMS Work Group Meeting dates
• Meetf ng Rost
,a Member Transition
• New Community {9usiness Members
r. Committees needed
Le Questians}Comment5
w Adjournment
+ Reminder of Upcoming Training
CERT Training July and August
■ G -300 lntermedtate Incident Command Systems and
Control Sept 11 -13
e G -400 Advanced Tnrident Command Systam� ajid
ier Command & General Staff: Complex Inddents
271
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
„M.
LMS Steering Committee Lot
Meeting SummRry
,tune 19,201;3
Debble lwif+ m Lantana
Mph Wall - West Paitn Beach
CAgse LaJeune - Boynton Beach
Kett koundtree - No thern IIRC Imp. 17is1.
James Farrell - P13C. Library
Riclhard CiaA11ryhl - PT3C 1361&ng Diwi,.6nn
Bvv fly Su,l1- uvlle Glade
Paul Qorling - D),Iray Brach
Zoic Burgess - Highlaml Btac_h
Bcth McElroy - SFW D
Dobra R. Buff - City of Belle Glade
David Rotawr - Jupilcr
Dill Johnsun - PBC DFM
Ed Ken- - Soulh Day
Paul Blo&k un - PDC fir¢ Rrs
Jennifer Bcckman -PBC DRC
] ahn Bonde - Wrllingtan
Larry Lcskovj an- Palm Bcach State College
Alvin Jolurson -City of PahGhee
Chris Marsh - Village of Royal l'alin 13cnh
Karla White cityori.akL� words
rejoin Dledmw, 1113C DUN
13Mkamulld;
The 1.M9 Steering Cttmmiacu saves as the Local Mitigalion Stralcgy (LMS) program board of
dircelim; thtTu UCC, save• as the primary decision and police body for LMS sponsored
rnhigation aedivIty- This winmittee meets on quanerly basis for Lhc purpose of mviewiq the
plan anal identirying updmv requirements.
liighlighps;
t Kcn Ruundtrcc weleomai everyone to the 2vd quarterly Steering Comniltiee Meeririg of
the year Ow al vicar.
+ Ken introduced the new LMS coprdinater, Kelvin Rledsoe, acid thou aJlo%wd everyone in
the roam to inimcluce themselves, including die City they were Isar,,.
+ Kcn discussed the prior working group meeting and inforlued everycue that thep [)Id a
sunmiwy available of the fast meeting and }have -everyniie tin» 10 rrViaw [hi8 nines and
asked if There were my gnestiorrs.
■ VLuiding sources were discussed wkd it Nwis kirterniAud Thal W ft lime lhere WC no qeW
rttttidi nP snrjrces avgi lable.
272
Pale 1 of 3
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
• John Bonde discussed the Evaluation Committee's last meeting and informed the LMS
committee that the two projects evaluated had been integrated into the PPL list that will
be sent forward if the LMS Steering Committee had no objections. Hearing none, the
PPL list was approved and was forwarded to the State.
• Ken then discussed the State's response to questions the Evaluation Committee had
concerning the current and future PPL list. The final result was that the county had the
ability to submit the list in any form that they want the State to consider. The county sets
the priorities.
• The next date for the Steering committee was decided to be September IS, 2013 at
111 :00 a.m. at the EOC.
• LMS updates will be worked through the steering committee. The Plan will be broken
down and sent to members for input and commendations and then discussed at the
quarterly steering committee meetings. The LMS coordinator will begin to send out
portions needed to be reviewed immediately.
• The LMS news letter will continue with support from the steering committee. It was
determined that the Letter was a very useful tool for getting the work out on LMS issues.
• Ralph Wall from the City of West Palm Reach agreed to host the working group
meeting. It was determined that the meeting would be either in July or August based on
dates available for the venue. Ralph confirmed the date for Wednesday July 31, 2013 at
10:00 am. Parking will be in the City Center Parking Garage adjacent to City Hall at the
comer of Banyan Boulevard and Dixie Highway. Ralph is working on having the parking
validated. The address for City Hall is 401 Clematis Street, West Palm Beach, 33401.
This meet is a mandatory meeting for all municipalities.
• The LMS newsletter will continue to be published with the help and input from the
steering committee and the community.
• The Steering committee discusses group and committee transition, The 1valuation
committee Chair will be retiring in December. The LMS chair asked that the group
consider serving on or having a member of their city serving on the committee. The Chair
stated that he would be contacting members to assess their interest.
• The Committee discussed adding members to the steering committee and at a minimum
ensuring that based on the charter that the required members are on the committee. The
list will be reviewed to ensure we are meeting minimum requirements and also ensure
that those on the committee are regular attendees.
Page 2 of 3
273
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
• The LMS Steering committee Chair stated that committees would be formed as needed to
accomplish the goals of the LMS.
• After the meeting agenda was finished, there was helpful discussion by Carisse Lejeune
(City of Boynton Beach) and Ralph Wall (City of West Palm Beach) concerning items
critical to the municipalities in Palm Beach County, Ralph provided some hand -outs to
the group and Carisse referenced the Biggert Waters ACT (Slides attached).
• The meeting was adjourned at l 1:58 a.m.
Summary:
Provided by Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator
Approved by, Ken Roundtree, LMS Chainnan
274
Page 3 of 3
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Palm Beach County
Local Mitigation Strategy LS
Steering Committee Meeting
• � y
:■ hall to Order and Jntfadvrrtions
■ Prior Working Group Meeting
• Current and Expected Funding Sources
;r Recommendations from 15valuation Pane]
=a 2412 Project Prioritization List (PPL) Update
•+ Future Meeting Dates & 2014 LMS Plan Updake
.-* Question5yComments
+ Adjournment
+ Reminder of Upcoming Training
a 6-3k3 Miugauon Ior E+n&-go4cy Managers, December
10 - 11 and 3anuary 30 -31
v 5 -278 LAM*&- CostAnaiyss_ entry ievei Tralnhpg,
March 6 -J
BRO- 1 Hurricane kaslJkerat Community Planning
and Aes+7rrr Mamb 19 - March 20
275
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
T
Palm Beach County
Local Mitigation Strategy (LIMB)
'Steering Committee Meeting
�I
w Call to Order and Introductions
14 Prldr Working Giroup Meeting
• Current and Expected Funding Sources
+ Recommendations from Evaluation Panel
a 2412 Project Prioritization List (PPl*) Update
Future N9"Ong pates & 2014 LM5 Plan Update
Questions }Comments
. Adjournment
■ Reminder of Upcoming Training
4 +•39 MiU lion ADr E- weryency Nanagersr becerabeF
10 — I I and January 30 -31
• 6.27.5 Befwti t -Czt Analysis: Eotry levee! 7ralning,
March b - 7
0 Bfto• ooi kjarrlcane R&giilerrr Community Pknat ng
and Vesogn, March 19 — March 20
276
iL��
C
w
Op
t6
C
}
v
ep
W
G
+n
C
3
U
QJ
fL
ri
d�
d — �
b4 to
4J �
4J �
J
4Y
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
277
VI
CA
0
kir
10 1
W
z I
mg
�-{
}
277
I Im
C
CO
E
as
C
4)
G
4M
GJ
W
O
3
G
�6
GJ
E
m
M.
f1
to Tp
C ry
r O
� hl
4F
C!
4F k+ Qu
E
i a
a�
Fn
M
J
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
278
3
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
mow.
H
y w,�
M .+
LS Steering Committee
LMS Sleefinz Committee
June 4,2014
Emergency Mfinagemeot
M". .t.......... ,...........
I'hwe
Email
City ur
.....................
dig
,g,f
W'7 7.
el ov&&tu
orgauizelion........_
{
Q-1 f J ,Y*C. Y7. w
s �or.�l7 r4 yl
02V
UD-23C
LA. Tnr�qJ Q &—f 6-0�,
&�A
, T:,,7
t
C
4 %� Lff zxo fw7 R�S+CG I�M1I` t l i� .Fr �e 16f
279
4
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
at,N
I.MS Sfictriag Committee
i rI -in sheer
LMS Steerinz Committee
March 5, 2014 .�
Emergency Managem -ed
.............
Pha»e
NuLtunT......
f mail
Atka ess .....................
U-JVA , ' CV)
cllyl
organization_.._,,,,,
Car-( S 5
i -
s �1 ,
`{ - foo I L
1 �•i
I l � c�
/'s
4 0-17"V
0 --
-VO 7�' deal,,
Page 1oi 3
.o
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
k wm
wryN
oati LMS Steering Committee
L S Skean Committee,
March 5, 2014
Emergency Management
.......... j I'1►ai7c Gmail e�y1
lumucr, , ,,.. Address., , . , , , c�rgttnirutian
W (n
J..KI
-Toj) t-)
vf
IV)��
{ /
,t
04/-
x
O cav--
1'BC,
=qGl.�V-Chrn � -� � 9 Z-
281
PaPI of 2
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
RorN- LMS Steering Committee
sign -in sheer
ML ` Steeriniz Committee
aecembier11,2013
Emergency Management
Nunn..........................
.......
Rom
Num......
Email
Addre%s ...............
City or
{,....,
OA
I L4---f
C 1-6
G lfV l *"0
€oI
c, ,J, tk,
6p
- r
+✓ ,�
Pagel of3
282
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
rt
F oR� UMS STEERING COMMITTEE
PALM BEACH COUNTY UNIFIED LM
Member sign4n sheet
(Jame 19, 2013)
" *Debbie Manzo - Lantana a 61' t
Scott ]."ape - Delray Beach
Pawl f]trrlins -Nlroy F caa PJ
Allan Ortman - West Palm Beach
David Rotor - Jupiter
Ed Kerr - Saudi Bay
Joan Bormie - Wellingkv
C.ari-we Le]uene- Boynton B€
Beverly Scott - iiel le Glk&
Ralph WAIL - Wcsl PaLm Bras
Alison Boy&Hank Erikson -
Link Walther - Continental &
Kathie Kearney N()C I I I&
—Tom 5 win - Verizon Wit%ele%
Larry Lnkovjan- Palm Dead.
A] Grasso - PBC Hcaith Np
Peter Newman - PBC Health
Jentsifer I3ecirman - DGSosler Recovcry C`.oaiilion g L,
Tony Carper - Area 7 Regional Courdi motor, ` '*
Florida DEM - -- -
283
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Kepi Todd - Palm Beach C uumy
Paul 131nekson- Palm Beach County ¢ _
*Kett Raundu+ae - Northern Pakm BcacEr County lmprcavemsni District
ue
Jim Shallman -Indian -Grail Improvement District
Kelvin Bledsoe (rwnc voting) DFM - PtIYn Rt!aab {runty
* - Chairperson
* *- Vi�e•CJtair �`
f /
I�4I +rL {#
01 a
4 C�_ 1
.,
f
R1tl�
Karen Teuune- Pel,tt DvArsh
&l Karr- Sotith Say - Absaenl
Carisse Lejeune - Boyrltop beach
Kelvin Blcclsoe— LMS C x)rdiwfjF
Karla White Chke Worth
Backgl+aund:
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
.mom,
1,M5 fivaluatlon PH 116
Meeting SUknlharY
May 22, 2014
Jmnll�-r Beckman - PBC bRC
Ken Roundirer- NP(JD
Ca4m l•C&mn Green Acres - Chair
The LMS E.ualllatiO3i Pafiei 33 {lcsigr3atCtd 1D eyaluate, revjeW. 23VA3rc, and rank, mitigatiotl projix.ts
tltrtrUgh Csta4l.Wied local, zitatt; send i'LxlcraI 1)1'Ioritizatlop pro-otmw4 miAl Criteria.
highlights:
■ The new I-ME Claalr opened the mcetmg utld atlnwed everyone to introduce thelrl-yclvcs.
There were Iwo view mciubers to the wwaluasittn wmirittm; Darla While, wW Carim
L.cJeane,
■ Tlie 1'anel discussed IhL one project that mas subaftactl # it mviow From the villagt (IF
Royal Palm BeacJL The pmjgcl was scored and earne i11 at rtunnccr 3I of 71. The City [11'
Green Aems retry( vW Iwo proiccts off the 1wevkws PPI. list leaving 71 romahiuig-
* Scores were relehsud For all members, once agoin dommlraling a clear pattern between
reviewers alld their swmms. 'this demonstrates the EvftImitiun Panel's ability m seewre
prlects consWcAtly rvvu a Continuum The group was pl{asc that they were com -Utrni
acrosm the hoard.
11 WU Mill agMLd that the committcV "c 341 mmrt twice a year, nnoe in Mey alnd once in
Nov mhi,r with the date In he Frtl Ks IN: Trmviirg approadied atu] mold k- agrmi uposf.
t'age 1 of 2
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
• The next Evaluation committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 6, 2014 at
2:00 p.m, at the EOC.
• All new projects be submitted 30 days before the next evaluation panel meeting, which
would be October 7, 2014, This provides the panel to have suitable time to review new
proposed projects.
• The LMS Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for June 4, 2014. Recommendations
will be made to Steering Committee for final PPL approval.
Summary submitted by,
Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator
Palm Beach County Division of Emergency Management
Page 2 of 2
:•
n
i
IP {6R14+'
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
LMS E:vahintion Peucl
Mcciltsg S kimmary
mby 34, 2413
Karen Temnic- Palm Rcsrah
Ed Kerr - South Bay
lien Routldtite- NPC.lT)
loom Guerrero EM Program C T� 3irmtor
Absent - Paid Dorlirsg, CIOTAY Duach
C3ackgnound.
r
r.
u
Jenniicr Rcckrrurn - 1' BC DA
lahu T#mlt!- Wetlingrton
Ahxnnl - Paul 31ockson• 118C Fire Resum
KeIYIrk Bledsoe - TrMS Coordinator
The LMS Evaluation Prrtwl La dusignaiod to evaluate, veview, Six„ e, and rink mitigtion pie jean
th. ough established beet, state and Waal prioritization pmce�--�o arul rri1cri&
Hi lIgh"t
a The new LMS WOrdin:11 or umi New ELnerga y progmttt =T)jirtutuT was introduced to
die panel_ .
■ 1'11;13aIWJ discussed the reLami roLmd of projects tlugt were tip tar review (2)_ This ntimber
was a great relief froin 41st 14Si Pulml of pro -act that included 52 sulxmissu,ws. Tlnc 110w
list was approved W lx,- prwm I. to 1k LMS stmitig coirunittee with wrrergiogw,
• SCOM, SYere reletscd CqT #rll iracmhcm mice a�;aiu dermpiL tatirtg a ulcor pwlemi between
reviewers aisd their Suure$. This dmonsirates the Evatuatiott P,ttttl's jibility to score
projects cnnr-istently fomr n Lontirluorrr. The group was fleece tlsrIt they 5we,rC ex7nsisteut
across the lxwrrcl.
■ The Panel disc -9ml had a Very long disco& ;ion on which thu r'undi3 wcrc awardmi, to
whwn tlsey wcrc aiwsnlcd to, aitd what the prnetr" wars otw4 qhc rc�ainmuldadDlis left
our wmmitiae and were Convarded to the Slate: The committee wanted to I ww wF�
pa3gp 1 of z
287
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
there a possibility of submitting lists by disaster event instead of simply adding to the list
twice a year, thereby having projects changing priorities without reasonable justification.
• The LMS Coordinator stated that he would inquire from the state how this process is
done to provide better guidance to the county, especially the LMS Steering committee.
• The community also discussed was there a possibility to have a procedure to protect
smaller municipalities in the request for projects.
• The committee discussed member transition, the process of replacing members who
maybe leaving the committee due to retirement or other reasons. The chair
recommended that it be a subject at the LMS steering committee meeting.
• We will elect a new chair at the nest scheduled LMS Evaluation committee meeting.
• It was discussed and approved that the committee would meet twice a year, once in May
and once in November with the date to be set as the meeting approached and could be
agreed upon.
• The next Evaluation committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 7, 2013 at
2:00 p.m, at the EOC.
• The committee recommended that all new projects be submitted 30 days before the next
evaluation panel meeting. That date is 7 October 2013. This provides the panel to have
suitable time to review new proposed projects.
• The LMS Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for June 19, 2013. Recorru-nendalions
will be made to Steering Committee for final PPL approval.
Surnmary submitted by,
Kelvin Bledsoe, LMS Coordinator
Palm Beach County Division of Emergency Management
Page 2 of 2
NM
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
This page intentionally left blank
..
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Appendix H: Repetitive Loss Properties
In accordance with the following FEMA requirement, the PBC LMS includes repetitive flood
loss properties in its risk assessments:
Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii): The risk assessment must also address National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) insured structures that have been repetitively damaged floods.
In addition, PBC's LMS and Community Rating System programs monitor the number and
locations of flood prone properties countywide. At this writing, there were an estimated 285
FEMA- registered repetitive flood loss properties in the combined jurisdictions of incorporated
and unincorporated PBC.
Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss properties are defined by the National Flood Insurance Program as: "properties
with two or more NFIP claims of at least $1,000 in any rolling ten year period." Repetitive -loss
properties constitute a significant drain on the resources of the NFIP, costing about
200,000,000 annually. Repetitive -loss properties comprise approximately 1 percent of currently
insured properties but account for 25 to 30 percent of claims losses. They represent a
key target of the NFIP for mitigation, including relocation, elevation and buyouts.
As of June 2014 PBC has a total of 66 repetitive loss properties with a total estimated cost
of $1,861,366. A list of repetitive loss properties is available in this appendix
290
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Repetitive Loss Properties in Palm Beach County
Appendix H
291
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Appendix L• Project Scoring Examples
Requirement: §201.6(c)(3)(iii): The mitigation strategy section shall include an action plan
describing how the actions identified in section (c)(3)(ii) will be prioritized, implemented, and
administered by the local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the
extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost benefit review of the proposed
projects and their associated costs.
This appendix supports the above FEMA requirement by providing a few examples of
PBC's current project scoring process using the criteria established at the program's inception.
This process is used as the basis for ranking (prioritizing) proposed projects. In order for a
mitigation project to be eligible for federal monies there must be a Benefit Cost Analysis
completed with results of a ratio greater than 1. This appendix illustrates the current scoring
process through four examples:
• EXAMPLE 1: Community A - Library Wind Retrofit
• EXAMPLE 2: Community B - RV Park Flooding Prevention
• EXAMPLE 3: Community C - Hardening of an EOC; and
• EXAMPLE 4: Community D - Initiation of a Burn Program to Prevent Wildfire
losses in the Urban Interface
EXAMPLE 1: COMMUNITY A - LIBRARY RETROFIT
Community A is a well -to -do community centered along the beach and on the Intracoastal
Water. They have recently completed a large and very nice public library located on the
Intracoastal Waterway. The library has many windows and a picturesque view of the
waterway. The building itself is engineered to withstand category 5 hurricane force winds, but
it is located in an area that can expect a 5 foot above mean high tide storm surge during storms
rated at category 3 or higher. A storm surge of this magnitude will flood the bottom floor of
this library to a depth of 2 feet. Equipment and books threatened by such an event are valued
at an estimated $200,000. It will cost approximately $60,000 to raise the books and
equipment in this library 3 ft above their current level. This would eliminate the $60,000 of
exposure in all but the most catastrophic hurricanes of category 5 strength, achieving and an
estimated 80% reduction in potential losses.
Applying the Benefit/Cost formula:
($200,000 - $40,000)) $ 60,000 = 2.67 Benefit/Cost Ratio therefore, this is a viable project.
Applying the Scoring Criteria (See Attached Score Sheet) this project would be scored as
follows:
COMMUNITY BENEFIT
This is a Flood Damage Reduction activity and is awarded 10 points here;
292
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Libraries are considered secondary critical facilities and 6 points are awarded here;
In terms of Community Exposure $200,000 is considered moderate and the frequency of the
hazard this project mitigates for, Category 3 or higher storm surge, is low. Therefore Moderate
(M) Exposure (E) + Low (L) Frequency (F) = 4 points under category; and
Cost Effectiveness in terms of the Benefit/Cost Ration is 2.67; therefore 12 points are awarded
here.
This project's score under Community Benefit is 32.
COMMUNITY COMMITMENT
This project is not contained within a specific policy of Community A's Comprehensive Growth
Management Plan, but this type of mitigation is addressed as a broad goal in the Coastal
Management Element of that plan. Five points are awarded under this category;
Although libraries are considered secondary critical facilities this project is not part of any
emergency management plan. It is, however, part of the Library Department's long -term
strategic plan, which has been officially adopted by the City Council. Ten points are awarded
here;
While there is considerable public support for the library in general, and there is every reason to
believe there would be widespread public support for this mitigation project if it was presented
to the public, this has not yet been done. Most of the citizens of Community A are not aware of
the potential problem this mitigation project addresses. No points can be awarded here at this
time. (Community A could change this score by holding public workshops on the problem and
soliciting voter response questionnaires or other methods.)
This projects score under Community Commitment is 15 points.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
There are no regulatory problems with this project and 5 points are awarded here;
Although the exposure is clearly visible, there has not been a severe hurricane since this library
was constructed and therefore there is no history of loss or repetitive loss for this structure.
Flood hazard mitigation money available now is directed toward structures suffering repetitive
losses, and consequently no funds are immediately available. FEMA and other funding sources
are being reviewed and it is believed that funds for this type of mitigation project will be
available within the next 1 to 2 years. This project is awarded 6 points in this category;
Community A is an affluent community and despite the fact that the public is currently unaware
of this problem, the City Council feels confident enough of public support to commit a 50%
match, or $30,000 toward this mitigation effort. The project is awarded 5 points here; and if
funding was to become available, this project could accomplish its objective of raising library
293
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
books and equipment above the category 3 storm surge level in less than one year. The project is
awarded 5 points here.
This project's score under Project Implementation is 21 points.
The Final Score for this proposed mitigation project is 68 points.
EXAMPLE 2: COMMUNITY B - RV PARK FLOODING PREVENTION
Community B has a large RV park with very poor drainage. Every time there is a minimal rain
event this area floods, causing significant danger and health hazards to the residents in terms of
flooded power outlets and sewage- contaminated standing water. These events also cause the
town and county considerable expense and inconvenience such as traffic problems, emergency
services disruption, and clean -up. This type of flooding happens approximately eight times per
year with an estimated expense to the town and county of $3,000 per event. Correcting this
problem will require a substantial reworking of the local drainage system. The estimated cost
for this mitigation effort is $400,000.
If the flooding this project is designed to correct occurs eight times a year at a cost of $3,000 per
event to the town and county in terms of police, fire /rescue, and utility worker time
involvement, then Community B has a documented exposure of $24,000 per year to this hazard.
If we assume the life expectancy of a drainage project to be 30 years, the potential savings to the
town and county could be as high as $720,000. A reduction in the frequency of these flooding
events by 90% would make the Benefit/Cost ratio on this project:
($720,000 - $72,000) $400,000 = 1.62 Benefit/Cost Ratio therefore, this is a viable project.
Applying the Scoring Criteria (See Attached Score Sheet) this project would be scored as
follows:
COMMUNITY BENEFIT
This project is a Flood Damage reduction project and is awarded 10 points under the CRS Credit
criterion.
This project addresses a problem within an RV park where there are no permanent residents. It
does not address critical elements of the community infrastructure and must be considered as
addressing only public convenience considerations. Award 4 points here.
Based on individual flooding events the community's exposure is low, but when considered
over time this exposure becomes much higher. Points are awarded under this criterion based on
a Medium Exposure and a High Frequency of occurrence. Nine points are awarded under this
criterion.
The cost effectiveness based on the Benefit/Cost ratio for this project is 1.62; therefore 8 points
are awarded here.
294
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Total project score under Community Benefit is 31 points.
COMMUNITY COMMITMENT
This proposed project is contained within a broad mitigation goal under the Coastal Element of
Community B's CGMP, but Community B has developed a proposed specific Policy
amendment directed toward this type of drainage system retrofit. The project is awarded 8
points here.
This project is also contained within the Flood Plain Management Plan for Community B, which
has been officially adopted. Award 10 points in this category.
This problem has been the subject of numerous letters and editorials in the local paper. It has
also been the subject of one advertised public meeting. Award 5 points here.
Total project score under Community Commitment = 23 points
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
This project requires a considerable amount of construction work. While it is consistent within
the local regulatory frame work there are regional and possibly national issues that will have to
be addressed. Since the project will be discharging stormwater runoff into some body of water
there will be water quality issues that must be dealt with. If Federal money is used, an NPDES
review will be required. While all these issues can be addressed, they will delay implementation
of the project and increase its cost. Award only 1 point under this criterion.
At the moment there are no identified sources for funding for this project. Once the LMS is
adopted it is believed the Federal Government will make available, through the State DEM some
funds to implement priority mitigation projects. These funds may be available within 1 to 2
years. Award 6 points under this criterion.
While Community B is relatively affluent they are not in a position to match more than 10% or
$40,000 on a project of this magnitude. Award 1 point under this criterion.
If funding were immediately available for this project it would take approximately three years
before this project could be permitted, bid, constructed, and operational. Award 3 points under
this criterion.
Total project points under Project Implementation = 11
The Final Score for this proposed mitigation project is 65 points.
EXAMPLE 3: COMMUNITY C - DEVELOP A HARDENED EOC
Community C has no hardened Emergency Operations Center. They presently base their
emergency management personnel in city office buildings that are highly vulnerable to both
295
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
flooding and wind damage. They have an estimated $300,000 worth of computer,
communications, and emergency response equipment housed within these vulnerable facilities.
The county provides Community C with its Fire/Rescue services and is presently building a
new, hardened fire station to serve this section of the county. County Fire /Rescue Services have
offered to provide Community C space within their new building, but Community C will have to
have this space fitted for Emergency Management Operations. Fitting this space and moving
Community C's existing equipment into it will cost Community C an estimated $60,000. By
undertaking this move Community C should reduce the exposure to its physical assets by 95%
as well as position its Emergency Management Personnel in a much safer environment.
Applying the Benefit/Cost formula shows:
($300,000 - $15,000) $ 60,000 = 4.75 Benefit/Cost Ratio therefore, this is a viable project.
Applying the Scoring Criteria (See Attached Score Sheet) to this project would be scored as
follows:
COMMUNITY BENEFIT
Although not its specific aim, this project may be classified as a Flood Damage Reduction
activity. Award 10 points under this criterion.
This project addresses hardening of a Primary Critical Facility. Award 10 points here.
The currently utilized location of emergency management operations is highly vulnerable to
sever tropical storms, hurricanes, or tornadoes and all these types of storms occur with medium
frequency. Thus, we have a High Exposure = Medium Frequency = 8 points for this criterion.
The cost effectiveness for this proposed project expressed as the Benefit/Cost Ration is
4.75, thus 20 points are awarded in this criterion. Total Community Benefit Points = 48
COMMUNITY COMMITMENT
The concept of developing a hardened EOC for Community C is expressed in both a goal and a
specific Policy of their CGMP. Award 10 points under this criterion.
Development of a permanent, protected EOC is also contained with Community C's Emergency
Management Plan. Award 10 points under this criterion.
There is no real public support for, or opposition to, this project. Although it is believed the
public would be highly supportive of this project if it were presented to them, they are at this
time unaware of the problem. No points can be awarded in this criterion.
Total Community Commitment points = 20
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
There are no regulatory problems with this proposed project. Award 5 points here.
296
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
There is an identified funding source through the State Department of Emergency Management
for the project at this time. Award 10 points here.
Community C will match with funds and in -kind services 20% of the cost of this project. Award
2 points for this criterion.
This project can be accomplished as soon as the new fire station is ready for occupancy in
approximately six months. Award 5 points here.
Total Project Implementation Points = 22 points
The Final Score for this proposed mitigation project is 90 points.
EXAMPLE 4: COMMUNITY D - INITIATION OF A CONTROLLED BURNING
PROGRAM TO PREVENT WILDFIRE LOSSES IN THE URBAN INTERFACE ZONE.
Community D has a large agricultural, ranching, and undeveloped land component within its
jurisdiction. The community wishes to undertake a controlled burning program along the urban
interface zone, but to do this it will have to upgrade its fire control equipment, pass a new
controlled burning ordinance, and get the required permission from the forestry and
environmental services. The cost of initiating this new program is estimated to be $200,000
including the necessary upgrading of fire control equipment. Community C has an exposure,
based on tax role data, of $3 million within the area where wildfire is considered a threat.
Controlled burning would reduce the potential risk of wildfire by 60 %.
Applying the Benefit/Cost formula shows:
($3,000,000 - $1,200,000) $200,000 = 9.0 Benefit/Cost Ratio therefore, this is a viable project.
Applying the Scoring Criteria (See Attached Score Sheet) to this project would be scored as
follows:
COMMUNITY BENEFIT
This is not a flood - related project so no points are awarded here.
There are primary critical facilities located in the area threatened by wildfire so this project does
mitigate for threats to critical elements of the community's infrastructure. Award 10 points here.
The community has a high exposure to wildfire ($3 million) and wildfires have occurred with
moderate frequency recently in south Florida. Award eight points for this criterion.
The project has a Benefit/Cost Ratio of 9.0. Award 20 points under this criterion.
Total Community Benefit Points = 38 points
297
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
COMMUNITY COMMITMENT
Controlled burning is currently expressed as a broad Goal under Community D's CGMP, but it
is the subject of a specific Policy amendment which has been proposed. Award eight points
here.
Controlled burning is not addressed in any existing emergency management plans, but following
last summer's wildfire outbreaks, controlled burning plans have been developed and proposed.
Award 6 points under this criterion.
The danger of wildfire and the desirability of a controlled burn program have been the subjects
of two publicly advertised meetings and a considerable number of letters and written comments
from the public at- large. Award 5 points for this criterion.
Total Community Commitment points = 19
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
The proposed controlled burn ordinance will have to be adopted by the City Council. Various
permits will have to be obtained from the county and Division of Forestry when controlled
burning is actually to take place, but these are not considered regulatory obstacles to the
program itself. The only area of non - regulatory compliance is an issue in passing the ordinance
creating the program itself. Award 4 points for this criterion.
The county and the City have agreed to put up the funding for this program so funds will be
available as soon as the program has been legally adopted by Community D. Award 10 points
here.
Community D will match 50% of the funds required for this program. Award 5 points here.
Once the program is in place it will begin to accomplish its stated goals immediately. Award 5
points here.
Total Project Implementation Points = 24 points
The Final Score for this proposed mitigation project is 81 points.
.•
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
This page intentionally left blank
299
Local Mitigation Strategy 1 2015
Appendix J: NFIP and CRS Status and Activities
This appendix is intended to provide current data and information on NFIP and CRS status and
activities countywide in fulfillment of the following FEMA requirement:
Requirement: §201.6(c)(3)(ii): The mitigation strategy must also address the jurisdiction's
participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and continued compliance with
NFIP requirements, as appropriate.
The tables on the following pages provide summaries of NFIP and CRS status and activities by
jurisdiction. A variety of FEMA, ISO and local resources were used to prepare the summary
tables.
Detailed summaries of CRS activities, class ratings and insurance savings are included. The
number and value of NFIP insurance policies in effect, claims activity, and savings realized
from CRS participation are also included on a jurisdiction be jurisdiction basis. Currently the
CRS program is generating close to $5 million in insurance premium savings countywide.
At this writing, the County's CRS program has been evaluated June 2014. A final score is yet to
be determined. This information is maintained at the EOC by the CRS Coordinator.
300
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
CID
Name
Policies in Force
Class Rating
120192
PALM BEACH COUNTY *
74,897
5
120193
ATLANTIS, CITY OF
439
7
120195
BOCA RATON, CITY OF
14,333
8
120196
BOYNTON BEACH, CITY OF
9,709
7
120198
CLOUD LAKE, TOWN OF
8
7
120207
HYPOLUXO, TOWN OF
1,163
8
120208
JUNO BEACH, TOWN OF
1,737
5
120211
LAKE CLARKE SHORES, TOWN OF
251
8
120212
LAKE PARK, TOWN OF
869
8
120213
LAKE WORTH, CITY OF
1,583
8
120214
LANTANA, TOWN OF
1,139
9
120215
MANALAPAN, TOWN OF
224
8
120216
MANGONIA PARK, TOWN OF
49
8
120217
NORTH PALM BEACH, VILLAGE OF
3,603
7
120220
PALM BEACH, TOWN OF
74,897
7
120221
PALM BEACH GARDENS, CITY OF
3,290
8
120223
PALM SPRINGS, VILLAGE OF
1,445
8
120227
SOUTH PALM BEACH, TOWN OF
1,601
8
120228
TEQUESTA, VILLAGE OF
1,362
8
120229
WEST PALM BEACH, CITY OF
6,823
6
125102
DELRAY BEACH, CITY OF
8,312
9
125109
GULF STREAM, TOWN OF
353
7
125111
HIGHLAND BEACH, TOWN OF
4,134
9
125119
JUPITER, TOWN OF
8,453
6
125134
OCEAN RIDGE, TOWN OF
1,316
7
125137
PALM BEACH SHORES, TOWN OF
989
8
125157
jWELLINGTON, VILLAGE OF
676
7
CRS Chart - Appendix J
301
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Palm Beach County and its municipalities will continue their commitment to NFIP by
continuing to:
• Enforce the Floodplain Management Ordinance which regulates new development
and substantial improvements in the special flood hazard areas.
• Inform the community by news releases and open public meeting
• Community Outreach
• County Public TV
• Maintain elevation certificates on file for all new construction in the SFHAS or for
substantial improvements to properties in the sfha.
o "Doing Business with the County" seminars geared toward construction
industry and builders
• Use best available (flood map) data for issuing construction permits.
• Public Education Seminars
• Updated mapping provided to each municipality
• Mapping placed in all county libraries
• Maintain public records and make them available for review.
• Community outreach
• News releases and county public TV
• Maintain records pertaining to LOMAS, and LOMRS, etc.
• Provide information related to flood hazards, flood maps, etc., to the public upon
request.
• Continue community outreach efforts for compliance with the community rating
system program.
o Integrate new NFIP information and mapping into already existing strong
community presentations
• Continue to promote flood insurance to property owners.
o Increase and continue outreach presentations to community and home
owners associations
• Continue to update the public and enable their participation in the flood remapping
prod ect.
• Community outreach
• News releases and county public TV
• Maintain flood hazard publications at the main branch of the library.
302
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
• Where feasible, continue to identify /acquire land in the SFHA open
space /preservation.
• Promote hazard flood mitigation to the public.
• LMS posted on the County website
• Grant information posted on County website
• Integrate into outreach presentation
• Continue drainage maintenance and drainage system improvement projects.
o Encourage more drainage projects through -out the county in all LMS
meetings
• Continue floodplain management activities and target a Class 5 Rating.
• Adopt and enforce the floodplain management plan
• Schedule quarterly meetings with CRS User Group and invite all 38
municipalities
• Provide continued education and best practices to all municipalities
• Provide robust community assistance program
• Community outreach presentations
• Town hall meetings in different municipalities
• Press releases and TV programs
• Telephone information Hotline Floodplain and Mapping questions
• New map pick up information
• Outreach to municipalities not participating in the CRS/NFIP
• Provide continued outreach, best practices to municipalities that are not part
of the CRS/NFIP
• Document each municipality not a participant in the CRS/NFIP and
continue providing them with best practices incentives to participate
• Ensure that municipalities not participating in the CRS/NFIP are members
of the LMS working group, allowing them still to receive mitigation
information
303
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Appendix K: Mitigation Assessment Teams (MATs)
Should PBC be impacted by a natural disaster deemed by FEMA to be of national
significance, teams of technical specialists, referred to as Mitigation Assessment Teams
(MATS), might be mobilized by FEMA, in conjunction with State and local officials, to
conduct on -site qualitative engineering analyses to assess damage to government offices,
homes, hospitals, schools businesses, critical facilities and other structures and
infrastructure. The purpose of the assessment would be to determine the causes of
structural failures (or successes) and to evaluate the adequacy of local building codes,
practices and construction materials for the purpose of improving future performance.
They also might use the opportunity to review the effectiveness of previous mitigation
proj ects.
Most frequently MATS would be mobilized by FEMA's Directorate in response to joint
federal, state and local requests for technical support.
The technical make -up of MATS will depend largely on the nature and extent of damage
incurred. Disciplines most commonly represented are likely to include: civil and coastal
engineering, hydraulics, architecture, construction, and building code development and
enforcement. If the damage is severe enough, representatives from FEMA Headquarters,
Regional Office engineers, representatives from other Federal agencies and academia, and
experts from the design and construction industry may also participate. State
representatives would be dispatched by the Mitigation Bureau. The County would be
expected to provide local team members and support services as defined below.
At the county level, during activations, the Operations Section Chief will be responsible
for coordinating with the Logistics Section to arrange for local personnel, equipment,
vehicles, data, and other resources necessary to support MAT assessments. Once staffed
and equipped, MAT activities will be closely supported by the Damage Assessment and
Impact Assessment Units of the Operations Section under the direction of the Operations
Section Chief. Most likely FEMA and State representatives will bring personal resources
such as laptop computers, cell phones, GPS, etc. with them in their Go Bags, however,
backup inventories and sources for local resources will be maintained.
According to NIMS /ICS task force guidelines, federal and state MATS may choose to
coordinate their activities with local law enforcement homeland security units who
commonly perform critical infrastructure and key resource (CMR) field assessments
within the County. This temporary disaster response task force may also include special
operations personal from the fire service as necessary. Non - sensitive information from
local law enforcement's established database will be shared to the fullest extent possible
with the MATS. Any exchange of information associated with this initiative will limited
so as not to compromise local law enforcement's tactical or strategic capabilities or the
region's efforts in Cl/KR programs in support of the National Infrastructure Protection
Plan (NIPP).
304
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Lists of needed resources will be prepared by the Operations Manager and given to the
Logistics Manager who will be responsible for maintaining the inventories at the EOC or
other PBC facilities and ensuring equipment is secured, available and ready for
deployment. Access to special or emergency resources beyond the working inventory, may
be available through the Purchasing Unit, through the ESF 18 (Business & Industry)
functions at the regional and state levels, through WebEOC source lists or though private
sector partners party to the Business Continuity Information Network (BCIN). The BCIN
is a web -based service available to local businesses, county emergency management, and
organizations that assist businesses to gather and share critical information that support
continuity efforts before, during and after a disaster. Available year round as a public
service, this trusted, business -to- business, community network provides participating
companies a tool to track their key employees and supply chain status, and locate needed
recovery goods and services.
The County will provide appropriate public sector and private sector technical,
operational, logistical, administrative, and planning expertise necessary to support the
mitigation assessment mission. Lists of emergency contacts will be maintained by the
Logistics Section.
Depending on the geographic distribution and severity of damage throughout the PBC, the
MAT might establish its base(s) of operation at the EOC or at sites near any or all of the
six Emergency Operating Areas (EOAs).
The MATS may work in conjunction with Damage Assessment Teams or independently,
based on need, time priorities and the availability of State and FEMA MAT personnel.
The mission of the MATS is to learn exactly what happened and why, and how to reduce
disaster damage in the future. Key questions include: How did buildings perform? Did
winds exceed building codes? Did flood damages go beyond special flood hazard areas?
Were building codes followed and enforced? Were construction materials sufficient to
withstand wind and water damages? Were protective measures such as shutters used?
Were local, State and Federal building standards and ordinances sufficient?
Palm Beach County is the largest county by area in the U.S. east of the Mississippi River.
Most of its population and development are heavily concentrated in the eastern corridor
within 10 miles of the coastline. The County's emergency management planning is based
on the assumption that the County may not be serviced effectively by a single EOC
location. Consequently, the County has been divided into six Emergency Operations
Areas, each of which is equipped to function on its own before, during and after a disaster.
Pre - equipped field response trailers are available for deployment year round. Where lead
times are sufficient, resources will be pre - staged. Mitigation assessment resources may not
be available for all EOAs concurrently, in which case the Operations Section Chief will
work with the MAT to identify priorities and will request additional resources through
Logistics.
305
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
If available local personnel resources are insufficient, the County may be able to draw
mutual aid support from neighboring counties on an as needed basis. The Logistics and
Operations Sections may also coordinate with FDEM, as necessary and appropriate, to
arrange for field support from organizations such as the International Code Council.
Based on a comprehensive analysis of assessment data compiled in the field, the teams
will prepare recommendations regarding construction codes and standards, building
design, and best practices that PBC, its municipalities and the construction industry can
use to reduce future disaster damage. Throughout the process, the MAT will consult with
partnering government agencies and supporting private sector organizations to ensure
consensus on each phase of the investigation, including methodology, data collection, and
analysis. This will help to ensure the MAT's final recommendations represent the most
current and best available data and technical expertise. Once consensus is reached, FEMA
will issue a series of "Recovery Advisories" that will provide initial guidance on building
issues and best practices that can be used in the reconstruction process. FEMA will also
publish a comprehensive report that provides local decision makers with information and
detailed technical recommendations for improving building construction and design,
building code policy and enforcement, and mitigation activities that can limit or eliminate
damages in future disasters.
MAT observations and recommendations submitted to the LMS will provide a basis for
future mitigation strategies, initiatives and projects and the optimum uses of mitigation
assistance funds.
The DEM recovery section will provide oversight. The recovery and post- disaster
coordinator from the recovery section along with the LMS Coordinator will facilitate and
coordinate the application process and serve as a primary communication link with
funding agencies.
Public information will be coordinated through the Joint Information Center (managed by
ESF -14), based on cleared information provided by the MATS and Disaster Recovery
Centers. Longer -term, information will be integrated into media releases, LMS and CRS
outreach activities, public presentations, presentations at professional conferences, training
curricula, etc.
At this writing, Standard Operating Guidelines for mitigation assessment activities are in
the early planning stage. DEM will coordinate with the Inspections Section of the
County's Building Department to lay a foundation for development of Standard Operating
Guides. Many of the 38 municipalities of the County have their own building departments,
officials, and procedures and will be an integral part of the procedure development
process. Several of these departments can draw from their damage assessment experiences
following Hurricane Andrew in 1992 and to a lesser extent their experiences following
Hurricane Frances, Jeanne and Wilma which impacted PBC. Organizations such as the
PBC Builder's Association and the Building Code Advisory Board of PBC will also need
to be consulted.
306
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
This page intentionally left blank
307
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Appendix L: List of Acronyms
ALF
Assisted Living Facility
BCC
Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners
CDC
Center for Disease Control
CEI
Climate Extremes Index
CEMP
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan
CERT
Community Emergency Response Team
C -MAN
Coastal- Marine Automated Network
CRS
Community Rating System
DEM
Palm Beach County Division of Emergency Management
DOF
Florida Division of Forestry
EDMIS
Economic Disaster Management Information Systems
EM
Emergency Management
EMAP
Emergency Management Accreditation Program
EMPA
Emergency Management Preparedness & Assistance
EOA
Emergency Operations Area
EOC
Palm Beach County Emergency Operations Center
ERM
Environmental Resource Management
ESF
Emergency Support Function
FDACS
Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
FDEM
Florida Division of Emergency Management
FEMA
Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHMS
Florida Hazard Mitigation Strategy
FIRM
Flood Insurance Rate Maps
I"
Flood Mitigation Assistance Program
GCRI
Greenhouse Climate Response Index
GIS
Geographic Information System
HHD
Herbert Hoover Dike
HMGP
Hazard Mitigation Grants Program
ICS
Incident Command System
IPZ
Ingestion Pathway Zone
LMS
Local Mitigation Strategy
LDR
Local Development Regulations
LEPC
Local Emergency Planning Committee
LOD
Letter of Dispute
MAT
Mitigation Assessment Team
MLLW
Mean Lower Low Water
MOM
Maximum of Maximums
MPO
Metropolitan Planning Organization
NCDC
National Climactic Data Center
NFIP
National Flood Insurance Program
NGO
Non - Governmental Organization
NGVD
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
NHC
National Hurricane Center
NIMS
National Incident Management System
1'
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
List of Acronyms Cont.
NIPP
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
NOAA
National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration
NWS
National Weather Service
OPS
Outreach Project Strategy
PAPA
Property Appraisers Database
PDM
Pre - Disaster Mitigation
PDRP
Post Disaster Redevelopment Plan
PPL
Project Prioritization List
PZB
Department of Planning, Zoning, & Building
SARS
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
SFWMD
South Florida Water Management District
SLOSH
Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes
SWP
State Warning Point
TCRPC
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
TYLCV
Tomato yellow Leaf Curl Virus
WFO
National Weather Service Forecast Office
WHO
World Health Organization
309
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Appendix M: Maps
310
a
LAKE
OKEECHOBEE
SPA HOH
m ers�
ooker wy State Road 80
hip !
E
N
- \, _y OUTH LLE
D
BAY LADE
W
LLINGTON
R
Y
C
O
U
N
T
Y
d�
2
a
Agriculture Area
Agriculture Area County Boundary — Railroad Municipal Area
0 1 2 4
F�OH10A
_J
M Ilee
ISS GIS LS]
,\ pbcgov .orgVssIGISIWorklbnmton\LMS 20141Agri culture Area.mxd
June 17, 201
310
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Martin TEQUESTA Northern PBC
COU nty� `}'y`
PAL/lf l
GREENACRES WOR SEACqq
ATLANTIS , SOUThi�PALlE?
Jupiter to Lantana
J V ITER
E�TI
Lantana Rd BE�CH
- cean A /,I
I/ C1
W Irdiantown RdE fdianto .Rd
I
AN Tq j'�I
f=' � MAMA APAN
JUPITER
'`y
Y;r
m HYPO I1X0
I/\ F
i JU 1
1 0 OCEr 1If
BEA
Z- R7j�gE
g
Yt PALM BE CH
GARDE VS
H m� t
1''1
!r�1
Boynton Be_a_ch Blvd W Boynton Beac lvd - carp five A
3
moo, 1
f/I T
Y j
`o S
LL 1
L
¢
PGA BN d
B kY
A
o � 8 / ZES
GOLF
� O
NORTH PALM -
BOYNTON '� T
BEACH
Northlake Blvd -n
BEACH v) G ,
k
ST M
m
AKE m
+ C
RK v A
9 z Fi
W lue Heron vd [�,,�LL Tl
RI 1 PALM
O
trACH
C SH � S
Ave Atlantic Ave m C
W
_
A
ptl an�jO
/ E
ONlA
PA N
w A
Lu
T
DELRAY � j
N
BEACH 4/1,
WEST
ro'f
PALM W Ili Rd
l+
BEACH ✓'
r�,l
n"
yyo HIGH6IAND
Okeech ee Blvd I
BOCH
' �c
g
z (° %
a o j I
HAVERHILL
Q
c�
_ I'rl
✓� C
Southern Blvd cL�o Y+ A
WYamato Rd �I
—
{
!
RID E t 4 N
PAM
.AK' BEAT H
8OCA
Forest Hill Blvd CLARK
RATON
Z
SHORE
PALM LA E=
%,)
W 2d
GI es Rd
t'i
;i
✓I
— SPRINGS O THE
ri
I Southern PBC
rn m
Worth Rd a_
W Imelto Park Rd I /'I Lantana to
-
LaKe
.a GREENACRES o Z
Boca Raton
o ATLANTIS Z C Oi(TM PALM
LL
Lantana Rd 6 AN N�CH
_ _ _____ _
_ ___— —_—
m W cean ve f
NAM Ap
Broward County ______—____ —_
d �
Coastal Erosion Area
� <ORIOP
® Coastal Erosion Area - Railroad Municipal Area I County Boundary
Not To Scale
ISS GIS Services
vlpbcgov- orgtisslGISvWorkvbn orto n L MS 2014vCo astal Erosion Area mxd
dune 18 2o1
311
0
N
N
0
CG
U
O
N_
M
0
N
L1 6-h-
ati- �Qx� —o oow�x
C
�
ti
_P1ti lIlIWN
Pb 6oC s
x
a m o LL
vvpuoyN�.r
W a1 L sePiaolj s
�
�
a
m ¢ -
Io
E�
m
- E 1
i6
c h i
L PvoTJ ede)S S
f
o
�-
P21 nauli4�o - A.
k �.
3
m
>J
I
/��
IM
y
O
��
i
1
m
T
O
y
o°
�
�I
i�
LJ o
N
I
w
Y
x e \
O
a
_
w
LO
m
w°
I N
�r x
I
w
a
X
a
rn
0
L--------------- ------- - -`� - - - -- -J - - - -- - --- _
i
x
�
N_
M
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
o,s Evacuation Zones
N
Category 1 and Higher Category 5 and Higher Railroad
Category 2 and Higher Category 4 and Higher Municipal Area Not To Scale
F <OR1dA Category 3 and Higher County Boundary
ISS CIS Services %pbcgov orgliss\GlS\Work%rorton\LMS 20141Evacuation Zones.mxd June 18 201
313
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Historical Flood Areas
•�� Historical Flood Area Railroad Municipal Area County Boundary o0 1 2244
�°"Cp RlOA M tles
ISS GIS Services ��pbcgov .orgliss\GIS\Worklbnorton\LMS 20141Historical Flood Areas.mxd June 18 201
314
0
N
N
O
SbJJ
I�
CG
U
O
M
-�7 Z�r OU W 7z�r
Pi
x_41 L -
- - -��
I
lal �G �IIWN
Pad °rgm
�� Sim LL Ed -r isQPiaoljS
a - -
E m
O
p r L Peoy a7�1S S
0¢
} a!
v m N
4w 0 T
—2
I
m wa O
f
� � :C
�O
_
ELU
�'
v
PU haui!Lvm
k
^�ead a!ou!wa5 °
I
—
—
V
I
m
lu
I
I
x
Ir
0
C 0
I
�' rt
a c
' Y S O°
IJ'o
Vy
O is c ?
I
_ y•
ON° ] C
N
w
L m 0
l
m
w
oo
1
= z
�7b'd
_
• rid
M
C)
N
bJJ
a�
0
CG
U
O
M
0
cv
6
z
�
144— �
z o z
wx
�~
fs
I w Q w mf 9 Mdl se ua g
j
m
eh - L-pi,a N m
4
B a
6
as O
yf�
m
1
I z i
0
0
U
U
•?e.y elawuaes y
I �
i I
I
I
L a
o
v
�i
N
- lTriaxe
Q�
T
0
5��
0
5��o
I
\ps�ta a 0715
i
U
j W a
IW0
N
W
CL
L------------------------ - -- - - - --
-------------------
- - - - -y
0TY
.
M
O
N
b>'A
N
0
CG
U
O
0
cv
z o ti
�H
4so 4W��2
j Y �n 4 8 y q o
a w > Nl Nel!I!W N
' dy m` �
z sa F m rc pb�o�S m ¢ x a6
_
CO � Z4erg j 1Eepi�a�j m
a a c O
U
4
I�C=) ° w
z
I � pa
Dead s!ou!uaeg k L Q
a�
I a
^^++ U
If
W �.. I cm E
to I m Q
o
U, I o
CA
_$� p_�O�.elel5 J���r j ��y O C
w 4 i I S2
J �
W
I qa j L Q
I -3 j
L--------------------------- ��- - ---------- - - - - -- - ---�
_ ova • v
M
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Martin r-- ----- ------- I
Northern PBC
GREENACRES LpKF 8EL
County
ATLANTIS OR EH sour b Lm
- - - -- rENUESrA Jupiter to Lantana
LANEANA BE �ry
PJ TER
I
ET
I
OL Y
Indiantown W Indiantown Rd E ndia t t2d
-
r
N
MAN �IPAN
JUPITER —
5.�
�
NYPOL X0
7
JUNO
BEACH
K
r
y 1`
B-ovntoi Beach BL-d ! A
r
- 3 l
o
R1 )rE� I
�
i L
PGA Blvd 'L
B p�Y A
SR ¢Es
PAE RDE d
GOLF + N
GARDENS NS
NORT
PALM
BOYNro i T
BEACH
BEACH
Northle a vd
SERE
a
AKf
C
RK A
x
II
8 r
m N lue Heron Bfv e Heron 1Vd T
DELRAY i O
R PAL EACH
H S ES L
BEACH
( `'
i,
1 A
E
OMA
P N
I
i A
II4
f
N
WESr PALM _
BEACH 5 p
1
We stRd !�+
z l
g CH
tiI
Okeecho6e Blvd al Pal �imay 0
!! lJ
f
I
f
� C
HAOERH(LL
I
Southern Blvd
Ir A
RID
N
P
BEA H
Forest Hilf 8t L I
BOCA I
RATON
KE
SNORES _ I
I
~ SPRINGS 3
I
_ �
WELLINGTON EENACRES g I
I Southern PBC
N LL
I Lantana to
Lake Worth Rd
Boca Raton
o OR
T I
ATLANTIS 50 H
ana
Lant R P
W ntana dBE N
1
- - - - —�_— - - -- +
— —
}J�---
ANT 'APAN
Broward County _------- _ - - - --
A`��•ACH COC -._
Storm Surge Area
SLOSH Inundation — Railroad Municipal Area j_J County Boundary
"' <ostvP
Not To Scale
ISSGISServices
vlpbcgov- orgAisslGlSv Workv bncr1cMLMS2014 vStorm Surge Area rnxd
June :L8, 201
318
0
N
bJJ
a�
O
CG
U
O
M
0
N
-�7 Z�r OU
W ?Z�r
C
Pi
W � 011
Pd r"yr
a
-r, --L sepiaolj3l19
E
N
peoy OWIS S
JA
�
��
O
�
O
v�
'
Pil auliyy�
� a
i �
a m o
� � U
�
II I
end alouiweg k
i �
i I�
!
Im
—
i
Q
N
l
tl
I
I
C
�
0 0
f I
c4 °c
I
0
m
I
I
L o
O N
C
1
iQ m
X71
` 0
a
�
13 1�
iw
wo
/
N
Q U
I
i
O
I
w
i
o
a
a
T
NTV .
i
7bd • rd
M
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
Martin
County rEQUES / 1ti Northern PBC
- - -`
/PALN+I
GREENACRES ATLANTIS wOR �EACf;
Jupiter to Lantana
ITER
/sOUTO7,PALM
Rd CH
Lantana / l���
cean A I
g$ ET
n'
Rd W Indiantown
_.
ndiar n Rd Ejlnd(
/ tZd
P' t
ANTA
APAN
�
JHPIrER
1
m y,_ >
�
HY XOr
�OCEr N
Z- iR74 qE
1
/ i�1t
Boynton Be_a_ch Blvd W Boynton Beac lvd r•�yJ�epfive A
t
L
PGA Blvd !' / y
/B�t}rJY A
o ZES
P
GARDENS E.
m NORTH ./ "
GOLF o, //f N
/
PALM //�
BEACH yq,
` w
BOYNTON % �
BEACH v)
Northleke Blvd T
xiM
\R11C
Heron Be3yiid T
P',,y, EACH
,,//l O
R
I / /
A
Ave W Atlantic Ay e '��x Ci
A +an'° �/i
E
OAVA
P N,!%ff�
A
/
WESTPAL �l
DELRAY
BEACH u�l N
/I
BEACH
�r�Rd
/•�,j
C
Ge ohee Blv oyel / �//I Way m
y P�0 /G`F(jrIAND
fMCH
14AVERM L
C
Southern Blvd
-
WYamatoRd ;I
/
D A
GLL •+
H /•���I
// /I
ZA"Vol
Forest Hill Blvd q
BOCA
RATON
LAKE
CL AR '
W /
PALM
SPRINGS SHORE
GIa I
Ces Rry
%I
GREENACRES
Rd
jr1 Southern PBC
_ W Imelto Park Rd j / �'� Lantana to
/,�t
LaKe Worth
/
� I/ •I
AK
Boca Raton
m I � , I
o
ATLANTIS L o SO
w ntana sarl H
w. ANT AP
Lantana Rd W
------ t- - - - - -- +
}ice:
Broward Count i
y- - - - - -- --- - - - - --
Tsunami Threat Area
<OR�9
® Tsunami Threat Area -- Railroad Municipal Area fj County Boundary
Not To Scale
ISS GIS Services
N 1WorklbnortonlLMS 2014 \Tsunami Threat Area mxd
June 18 201
320
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
321
-- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- _ - --- Martin County -- -- - -- -- -- 11111111111111111h E4UESTA- 4TER
Indiantown Rd INLET
OL NY
Y!r
y NO
AC4Q
PAL
GAR � At
TH
.
Nxthlake B EACH G
- -. .lvd ... 0
WEST M 8 ACH
a PALM
BEACH Onts
% ` R
„ �M1lel61 Rd A
n ROY m Okeech :2 T
a 9
\� LOXAHATCHEE PALS .�Hl� L
'. State Road 80 GROVES SEA
So ern Blvd A
o
L PALL N
�z LA EAQH
Lest Hill Blvd LAR T
WELLINGTON e P IOR = I
SP
Ak Lake d L
GREENAQRES W C
OF
Lantana_ Rd_ _ ATLANTIS E�CHLM
LA dARAN Q
UP rn
r
( BOYNTON E N E
E4CH
IDjtE
! A
Bo ntori Be i
a I` N
Iffy
F' GOLFS
EFES
U41
qAM
W Attar)
Atlantic Ave _ pE I
8E I
VI
01
H LAND
Varnatoallilm L— EsICH
vl
>r
GVedos Rd .a m III
Palmetto P v � O!
�I z
----------- - - - - --
— —' I
Broward County ` ` EL
d •G i
Welifield Protection Zone Areas
• �<OBIOP • r
■ Wellfield Protection Zone =-- Railroad Municipal Area ; County Boundary n r 2 4
ISS GIS Services
I\ pbcgov.org %iss\GIS\Worklbnorton%LMS 20141Wellfield Protection Areas.mxd June z8 2o1
321
Local Mitigation Strategy 2015
322
mpena- 8C s - - --
TERUESTA
Martin County--
------------------
---------- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -
JU 1TER
INLET
W Indianlown Rd COLQN
JUPITER V
Fa �Tij '�•
nn
p Be b' F-
El es
theP,ihes
' C
/ n JUNO
~ BEACH
PALM BEACH m
GARDENS o
LL
PGA Blvd
a!
mE NORTH
_ rtirlake Blvd PALM
� EACH
—Z L E
E
PA
TYi Blue Heron Blv
Cre g WEST PALM ��� R!V C
B
BEACH
M ON7
PA
Whit
4dce
\
are
�o} ROYAL —
D er Ltor� /,F - LOX�h'elC 1'� PALM r`
��- / / - Ate BEACH Okeechobee Blvd
Co n Thousand Q
Pinesc
State Road m
80 /// - HAVERHILL
/f Southern Blvd CLOPD
�L
el ling nn / ' iy m RIDE
/ a LAK
m FCresl Hill Blvd CLA
_ ! - SHORE
P ALM
GS
Z GREENACRESSPRI
LA
/ WO I.
Lake Worth Rd
o a Q
Of o ATLANT7S8!
j
Lantana Rd -)
U
Hom land w
BOYNTONR
.�.
Wildland Urban Interface Area
- 1 County Boundary — Railroad Risk Area Municipal Area
0 0
<aatd!
Mies
ISS GIS Services
1\ pbcgov .org \iss\GIS\WorklbnmtoMLMS 20141Wildland Urban Interface Area. mxd
June 18 2o1
322
0
N
bJJ
N
O
CG
U
O
0
N
C
O U w Pi
ar,tl1 sepidolJ3 r __.f ° v
W m
I •• W + � C 7 7
I
-
i 00 ico
I N
I L
i i i Qi 4 E
TI a
i E !
I C
�i a
L
I
�CL C7
x2 � rn
w � o
i . m
I p I �rCj Q
I �I s
f' �I
L----- ---- - - - - -- - - -` -- - ------ -- - - -- - --------- - -- - -- - --
T
NTV ,
�'1vd • rid
M
N
M