1993-02 Adopting Comp Plan Amendment 92-1ORDINANCE NO. 2-93
' AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF
NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT 92-1 TO
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM
BEACH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ACT, AS
AMENDED, BEING SECTIONS 163.3161 ET. SEQ., FLORIDA
STATUTES; ATTACHING AS EXHIBIT "A" A COPY OF THE
AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE, A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND
FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et.
seq., Florida Statutes, the Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Act, the Village of North
Palm Beach is required to adopt amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on 7 July 1992, the Village
Planning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency,
held a Public Hearing to review amendment 92-2 and
on 7 July 1992 at its regular meeting, made a recommendation
to the Village Council to approve amendment 92-2;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: Pursuant to the provisions of the
Local Government Planning and Land Development Act, Section
163.161 et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Village of North Palm
Beach, Florida, hereby adopts amendment 92-2 to the
Comprehensive Plan of the Village of North Palm Beach,
Florida. A copy of amendment 92-2 is attached hereto and
' made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"
cpordall _ 1
Section 2: All ordinances or parts of
ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed.
' Section 3: Should any section or provision of
this ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a Court
of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall
not effect the remainder of this ordinance.
Section 4: This ordinance shall take effect
immediately upon passage.
PLACED ON PUBLIC HEARING THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992
PLACED ON PUBLIC HEARING THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1993
PLACED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY
OF FEBRUARY 1993
1
'
MA OR
ATTEST:
J
Village Clerk
cpordall _ 2 _
~.,
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH
FLORIDA
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
SECOND APPLICATIONS FOR THE YEAR 1992
(92-2)
March, 1992
L
Prepared for:
The Village of North Palm Beach
Prepared by:
Land Research Management, Inc.
REV. FEB. 25, 1993
L
1. Inconsistenc Between the Villa e's Land Develo men
Requlations(LDRs) and the Conservation Future Land
Use Category of the NPBCP.
t
Village Ordinance No. 29-91, dated July 11, 1991 amended
Section 95-32.2B, C-OS Conservation and Open Space District
of Appendix C-Zoning to include the following permitted uses:
"$• Single family dwellings with accessory buildings
customarily incident thereto.
A. Building height regulations. No main building
shall exceed two (2) stories in height and no
accessory building more than one (1) story.
B. Building site area regulations. The minimum
lot or building site for each single family
dwelling shall be one (1) acre of upland area
and have at least one lot dimension, width or
length, of a minimum of 1.50 feet.
C. Yard space regulation. No building or portion
' ~ thereof shall occupy a position fifty (50)
feet or less from the upland/wetland boundary
of the property.' '
The incorporation of the above language has created a perceived
inconsistency between the LDRs and the Future Land Use Classifi-
cation System of the NPBCP as presented on Table 3-l, page 3-13
of the Future Land Use Element. To further clarify the intent
of the definition of the Conservation/Open Space land use
category, the following revision is proposed:
"Conservation/ Land uses and activities within land
Open Space: areas "designated" for the primary
purpose of conserving or protecting
natural resources or environmental
quality, and includes areas designated
for such purposes, or combinations
thereof, as passive recreation, flood
control, protection of quality or
quantity of ground water or surface
' water, flood plain management, fisheries
rtianagement, and/or protection of vege-
tative community or wildlife habitats.
Permitted land uses shall include single
family housing uni t. s. ~'
B-15 ,
2. Revise Policy 1.3 (page 3-4) of the Future Land ,
Use Element to add the following wording:
"a. Conservation/Open Space - Maximum of one unit per
bland acre-"
Existing items a, .b and c will be relettered "b",
"c" and "d", accordingly; and
3. Add the following Special Policies to the Future
Land Use Element (page 3-11A):
"Special Policy 5.14: Residential development
in Planning AYea 1 shall be clustered in the least
environmentally sensitive portion Of the parcel which
is the subiect of an application £or a development order
"Special Policy 5 15• Year-round permanent resid
residential_ development within the area defined by the
current extent of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park
shall be limited to that provided for Park personnel."
'f'able 3-1, Future hand Use Classification System, of the Village
of North Ya1m Beach Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to cor-
rect the above noted inconsistency. The Amendment is detailed on
Attachment B2-l, which is a revision to Table 3-1 (page 3-13) of
the Future Land Use Element.
Further, to insure internal consistency throughout the various
elements of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan
related to this issue, several amendments to policy statements
are required. Required policy statement amendments oriented to
insuring the proper implementation of the revised Conservation/Open
Space land use category are detailed on Attachments B2-lA through
B2-1U. The b"ill.age of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan is
hereby amended to insure internal consistency by incorporating
changes detailed thereon.
1
13-16
lI. Scrivener Errors
A. Future hand Use M_a~ Series
' Lot 13 (approximately 0.25 acres) of the Fairhaven Subdivision
was inadvertently assigned an RL (Low Density Residential) Future
Land tzse classific~±t~.on. The classification should have been RM
(Medium DEnsity Residential). Futhermore, Village-owned lands
(approximatr~ly 5 acres) lyin: north and south of the Anchorage
Park wastewater facility were inadvertently assigned a PBG
. (Public Buildings and Grounds) classification. Figures 3-8 and
3-9 of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan are
heriby azaended to c:urrected the above noted errors. The
amendments are detailed in Attachments B2-2 and B2-8, which are
revisions to Figure 3-9 (page 3-24) and Figure 3-8 (page 3-23) of
the Future Land Use Element. In addition, several corrections to
' scrivener :;rrors on maps-in 'the Future Land Use Element of the
Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan are proposed. The
following table summarizes proposed amendments thereto.
NPBCP
Figure No. Paae No. Propose Amendment
3-2,3-3,3-9, 3-17,3-19,3-20 Within the Key of each
3-5,3-6,3-7, 3-21,3-22,3-23 Figure, amend "Refer to
3-8,3-9 and 3-29 and 3-26 Land Use Tables 3-27 and
3-11 3-28" to read as follows:
"Refer to Land Use Tables
` - 3-I anA q_9u
3-6 3-21 Add the Future Land Use
designation letter "C" to
the commercial. lot where
previously omitted
3-~ 3'22 Add an asteris}: to Florida
State Master File Ref. No.
SPB107 and a footnote which
' shall read as follows: "The
Oakes Building no longer
exists; however, reference
shall be retained until
deleted from tl,e Florida
- - Master Site Fiie".
B-17
Figures 3-2, 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-6, 3-7, 3-8, 3-9 and 3-11 of '
the Villaqe of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan are
hereby amended to incorporate changes per the above table.
The amendments are detailed on Attachments B2-3 through B2-10
which are revisions to the Future Land Use Element.
B. Additional Map Series Amendments.
Figure 2-2 (page 2-3) and Figure 4-1 (page 4-8) of the Villaqe
of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan are hereby amended to
incorporate proposed NPBCP Amendment 92-1 amendments by
incorporating municipal annexations presented therein. Further,
Figure 2-2 is hereby amended to delete the word "Legend'.
These amendments are detailed on Attachments B2-il and B2-12
which are revisions to Figure 2-2 of the Village Character ,
Statement Element and Figure 4-1 of the Traffic Circulation
Element of the Villaqe of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan.
C. Text Amendments.
Several corrections to scrivener errors in the Villaqe of North
Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan text have been identified.
Table 1 summarizes proposed amendments necessary to correct
said scrivener errors.
Pages 1-2, 1-23, 3-3, 3-7, 3-10, 5-5, 5-7, G-5, 6-14, 8-4, 8-5,
10-2 and 10-3 of the Villaqe of North Palm Beach Comprehensive
Plan are hereby amended to correct the errors noted in Table 1.
The amendments are detailed on Attachments B2-13 through B2-25.
B-18
1
1
- b
v v
u
v A ~ ~+
W m ro ~ U
c
-. i
a •
O
L N w .-1 C
W N O •.y y •.+
£ O a •~
w 2C A ~ ro •af ro
~ N 1(1 ,~ ~ m •M
O O O U W m
a U E N a m W •ro .~
a c a ro E rn m m uN ro
~' •'~ •o O E (11 a m m U ro
'm c m U O .H t~ W I •'y O
,~ f m ., c x l ro ae tm w ro
v c EH ~o E •.~ m .il sr ¢ "' U
'
to E w w ro •ro •o m m u .x +' 'm ~' r
o v x m w a v v x c m y ••+ •N o+
a c
w
m.
m •N
ro
m
I at
I d
N
•M ^
rl
I
ul
O W .7 W 'O M 3~ m aL b m rl O m M
4 E m m .+ W •, a N y •.I m i~ ar Al '~ >+
M 'd L~ N > .-1 U ro m N S O Tr "'I w on
a i oar I o ~, m m .~ m •~+ .++
x x ~, x .-I sa ~ cn a w
x c a. ,c a ~ I
.
• rn
v ~
m W N
F ~ O ,..I
z ro
~
w sa ae v .~ >. •~-
~+ ~ o In v v m E .-+ s> >, to ro
m w a c m ro= o •.~ ++ A ~ ~
c > sa m ro >a m x w N -+ i°
m o o v >•, m .-I c v v u
U N r-I •.+ NUJ .1 LI sC .-i N O 1.' O A U rn r
.-I
W
a
ro
F
ar N
G O t0 .--I r N C r V' O
~
++ .-/ .-f N .--1 rl rl N N
a m m
.G C •.i G C G M q q C. C
(L w a •rl •rl M a •"~ •~ M M
v m ., a a a -~ a a a
w
aro M o
z a N N m c~ r .a r r N r
I I I I I I I I I I
.i .i M M fh ('7 N N to N
m .
N
0
m
s~ b
c a
m ro
~ E a
a m~
a
i m ~
zw my
~ o
o a w x
0 0 0
~ M ~~
.-f
.i
w
m c
(.' •N
M 1-~
a
ui •~
1 ~
~O ~ 1a
m
m.iW
.i ro .i
N A H a
roan
~
3 ~ o m
mm wz++
w~ a
m ~b Y
>.ro m c ro w
s+~ tnro 3 0l
ro ro v sa
s~¢I cNaro
MM M m a.a
O .-1 ro ~ O U
roo >arotiam
vrcn ca~c~a
0
B-19
v
a
c
.~,
G
O
U
.-1
w
a
m
s~
v
•~ .~ v ~
.. ~ ~
v ~,
x .c ro v
ro m ~, a
a -.+
w .ro -ro
O1 !` O 'tl N 'U
J~ SN bl O~ •rl O~ •.+
b ~ m ~ tn~ 01 N 01 3.1
U) Ul .~ •rl 1~ .i O •-1 O
f~ ~ CO b G .-1 .~
O 25 I ? N i++ W ~. W
W W
O UI ,'Y U ~ N N
N ~ ro t~ o a..a a..a
a ~ .n -•+ v w ++ w +~
v
x
m ro
a ~
a s. ~
w v to •v +~
e a a rn
v v •..x a
~
a > ++ v +, •.~ o c
.
v ..+o dro am rn rn .
e sa >a . -I a a s rn ~
m w P: N u sa a zs ~o
s, •.+ s+ a v w a. •.. a+ •••
>J • .a ro ~ 0 0
W W U WW POW
4
~
a
Ul
N (`l
- f~
N
G
•i
•i .
1 ~
'~ -.-1 .-I l0
•.. a v v v
+, v v a a a
u ~c a a •.. •., -.~
~ v a a
u ro
x art
~ N m m
v z a v vi I I I
H I i o 0 0
m m .-I .-~ .-I
P.
U
PO • i
a. ro
z +~
a
v
G ~ a
o a o
.~, ~ .~
1> Ol ~
~ ro > ro
a > o a
w a~ N rn•..
_ U i~ N Sd ZY
(U N N N 11
a~ a No
z w o a o
U i-+ U
O O
m O
.i
$-2~
1
' III. Incorporation of Permanent Traffic Circulation Level-
of-Service (LOS) Standards Within the Village of
North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan (NPBCP).
Policy 1.5 (page 9-2) of the Traffic Circulation Element
requires the Village to update the Village of North Palm
Beach Support Documentation and NPBCP to establish perman-
ent LOS Standards. The current NPBCP establishes interim
LOS Standards, with the exception of Prosperity Farms Road,
as follows:
County Collector roadways - LOS Standard C/Peak Hour D;
State Minor Arterial roadways - LOS Standard C/Peak
Hour D; and
State Principal Arterial roadways - LOS Standard C/Peak
' Hour D.
Policy 1.3 (page 9-2) of the Traffic Circulation Element of
the NPBCP establishes an interim LOS Standard of D/Peak Hour D
on Prosperity Farms Road.
In addition, Policy 1.2 (page 9-2) of the Traffic Circulation
Element of the NPBCP requires the Village to pursue Constrained
Facility, Special Transportation Area or Geographic Area of
Exemption designation for County Road A-1-A by the State of
Florida or Palm Beach County.
Analyses completed in the Traffic Circulation Element update
of the Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation,
' prepared under separate cover, result in the following Traffic
Circulation Element amendment recommendations:
B-21
NPBr_p
I'ol icy Page No
1.]
1.]
1.2
l.2
Proposed Amendment
4-2 Uelete current Policy 1.1
4-2 Add new Policy 1.1 which shall read as follows:
"Policy 1.1: Based upon t}re 1900 Florida
Highway System Plan, Village roadways shall
be functionally grouped based upon the
number of traffic signals per mile as follows:
a. Group A - CounL-y Road A-1-A;
b. Group II - Prosperity Farms Road;
c. Group C - U.S. 1lighway No. 1 'and
Northlalce Boulevard; and
d. Village Collector - Lighthouse Drive.
'fhe Building Official may require traffic
.impact analyses prepared pursuant to the
Village Concurrency Management Ordinance
to account for adjustments to the functional
group classification of a particular roadway
necessitated by the placement of additional
traffic signals along classified roadways.
If said adjustments result in a functional
group other than A, II, or C, then level of
service analyses shall be based upon the
1980 Florida Highway System Plan Level of
Service Standards and Guidelines Manual."
~1-2 Delete current Policy 1.2
4--7_ Add new Policy L 2 which shall read as follows:
"Policy 1.2: 'Fhe Village hereby adopts
Average Annual Daily/Peak (four LOS Standards,
consistent with the Florida Department of
Transportation minimum acceptible operating
levels of service standards, for each of the
following listed roadways:
a. County Road A-1-A - D/D;
b. Prosperity Farms Road - D/D;
c. U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake
Boulevard - D/D; and
d. Lighthouse Drive - D/D.
The evaluation of currenC and projected
levels of service on functionally grouped
roadways shall be based upon Level-of-Service
D traffic volumes in 'FABLES 4-1 and 9-2.
FurCher, should the level of service on
County Road A-1-A fall below D/D, fhe
Village shall pursue a "Constrained Facility"
8-22
1
i
1.3
1.3
designation thereon."
4-2 Delete current Policy 1.3
9-2 Add new Policy 1.3 which shall read as follows:
"Policy 1.3: Prior to permitting any
additional expansion of Prosperity Farms
Road, the Village shall reevaluate Level-
of-Service Standards thereon. Further, in
order to maintain the residential
character of the Village, all roadways not
identified in Policy 1.1 shall be maintained
as two-laned local roadways."
r
i
Revisions to Policies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 (page 9-2) as per the
above table, are hereby incorporated within the Village of North
Palm Beach Comprehensive Pian. The proposed amendments are
detailed }n Attachment B2-26, which are revisions to the Traffic
Circulation Element.
Further, TABLES 9-1 and 4-2 are hereby added to the Village of
North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments
are detailed in Attachments B2-27 and B2-28, which are revisions
to the Traffic Circulation Element.
B-23
IV. Consistency FiiLh Regional and-State Plans_ '
According to Cha}ter 9J-5.021, Florida Administrative Code, the
Village's Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 187.201, Florida Statutes and
the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Regional Policy Plan.
Chapter 9J-5.021(2), Florida Administrative Code states that..."for
the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with the
state Comprehensive Plan or appropri:ite comprehensive regional
policy plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole
and no specific 3oa1 and policy shall be c~~nstrued or applied in
isolation from the other goals and policies."
A. Regional Plan Consistency
Proposed 92-2 Amendments were reviewed in terms of the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council Regional Policy Plan in order to determine
consistency. Based on this review, it is determined that no signif- '
icant regional issues are related to proposed g2_2 Amendments and
that they should be found consistent with regional goals and
policies.
B. State Plan Consistency
Goals of. the State Comprehensive Plan are listed in TABLL 1-1 of the
village's 1989 Comprehensive Plan. A review of the proposed 92-2
Amendments with respect to these goals results in the conclusions
that the; should be found consistent with State goals and policies.
1
B,24
ATTACIIM ENT B2-1
7'A BI.E 3-1
FUTURG LAND USE
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
For purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the following land use
classif icatlons, ~vhich are ~a pplicable ~to North Palm Beach
are
used to descr ,
ibe ex#sk#sg future land uses in the Village. The
classificatio ns are consistent with those defined in Chapter 9J5
F.A.C. and co ,
ncurrent with the Village's perception of use.
Residential: Land uses and activities within land areas used
predominantly for housing and excluding all
tourist accommodations.
Commercial: Larid uses and activities within land areas whicl,
are predominantly related to the sale, rental and
distributl on of products and the provision e€ or
performance of services. --
Recreation/ Land uses and activities within land areas where
Open Space: recreation occurs and lands which are either
developed or vacant and concerned primarily with
active or passive recreational use.
Conservation/ I.a nd uses and activities within land areas
Open Space: "designated" for the primary purpose of conserving
or protecting natural resources or envf ronmental
quality, and includes areas designated for such
purposes, or combinations thereof, as passive
recreation, flood control, protection of quality
or quantity of ground water or surface eater,
~ flood. plain management, fisheries management,
and/or protection of vegetative community or .
' wildlife habitats
P
itt
d
.
erm
e
land uses shall
include slnole-family hoUSlno Units.
Public Duild- Lands and structures that are owned, leased
or
ings 6 ,
operated by a government entity, such as
Grounds: libraries, police stations, fire stations, post
offices, government adminlstra Lion Guildings, and
areas used for associated storage of vehicles and
equipment. Also, lands and structures owned or
operated by a private entity and used for a public
purpose such as a privately held but publically
regulated utility.
Educational: t,a nd use activities and facilities
of public or
.
private primary or secondary schools, vocational
and technical schools, and colleges and
universities licensed by the Florida Department of
education, including the areas of buildings
,
campus open space, dormitories, recreational
.facilities or parking.
Other Public Land uses and activities within land areas
Fa cilltiess concerned with other public or private facilities
and institutions such as churches, clubs,
fraternal organizations, homes for the aged and
infirm, and other similar uses.
Transports-
li Land areas and uses devoted to the movement of
on: goods and people including streets and
associated rights-of-way.
Water: All areas covered by water or any right-of-way
for the purpose of conveying or scoring water.
Rev: )O/1G/D9;
Source: LRM, Inc., 2/D0; NPDCP Amendment
'
92-
1
3/92 3-13
A-25
ATTACHMENT A2-lA
}:. Reyulate the development of sites containing Historic
Sites, as per the Future band Use Map Series, to assure '
their protection, preservation and/or sensitive reuse.
Policy_1__?.,: Hy I'Y 1990, Land development regulations shall
he adopted which address the location and extent of non-residential
land uses i.n accordance with the future Land Use Map Series.
Planning Areas may include non-residential uses such as schools,
public facilities, recreational uses, etc., as indicated on the
suture Land Use Map and/or as al.l.owed by the Village Zoning Code.
Poli_cy__1_3: Land development- regulations adopted to implement
this comgl._elrensive Plan shall be based on and be consistent with
the following standards for. residential land use densities as
.indicated below: '
a. Conservation/Open Space - Maximum of one unit per
upland acre•
ab. l,ow density residential - fewer than 5.60 residential
units per gross acre;
bc. Medium density residential - 5.II1 to 11.0 residential
units per yross acre;
ed.iligh density residential - il.l. to 7.4.0 residential units
per yross acre.
In any event, specific entitled residential densities within the
ranges listed above shall lre subject to the application of the site
development triter.-.ia (e.y, setbacks, height limitations and site
dedications, etc.) promulgated in the Village Land Development '
Regulation>. '
Revised: NPDCP Aniendment 92-2
3-4
I3-25A
. ATTACBMEN I' B2-1B
Conservation Use lands designated on the Future Land Use Map
1 Series.
Policv 1.7: Future development within the designated Urban
Service Area shall be permitted only when central water and waste-
water systems are available or will be provided concurrent with
the impacts of development.
Policv 1.8: Residential subdivisions shall be designed to
include an efficient system of internal circulation, including the
provision of collector streets to feed traffic to arterial roads
and highways.
' OBJECTIVE 2. Development and redevelopment activities shall be
undertaken in a manner to ensure the protection of natural and
historic resources and the Village character as prescribed in the
Village Goal Statement and the Village Character Statement.
Policv ~ 1: The developer/owner of any site shall be
responsible for the on-site management of stormwater runoff in a
manner so that post-development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant
loads do not exceed predevelopment conditions and preserve existing
natural drainage features, as per Chapters 40E-4, 40E-40 and/or
40E-41, Florida Administrative Code
Polices 2.2: The Village land development regulations shall
' by FY 1990, regulate business activities which have the potential
3-6 Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2.
B-25B
ATTACHMENT B2-1C
OBJECTIVE 3. All deve
lop:nent orders and permits, commencing in FY
1990, for future development and redevelopment activities shall be
issued only if public facilities necessary to meet Level of Service
(~S) standards are available concurrent with the impacts of the
development. Further, require that-all on-site lands for rights-
of-way, easements, etc., be conveyed to the proper authority prior
to the issuance of building permits.
Policy 3 1: The development of residential and commercial
land shall be timed and staged in conjunction with the provision
of supporting community facilities, such as streets, utilities,
police and fire protection service, emergency medical service, and
public schools. '
PO11CV 3.7•
--____..• Public facilities and utilities shall be located
to: (1) maximize service efficiency; (2) minimize public costs;
and (3) minimize impacts upon the natural environment.
Poll. cv_3 3; p@r~.}Aing All properties within the designated Urban
Servic___e Area not utilizing central water and wastewater systems shall
be governed by the provisions of_ (1) Chapter 3B1.272, Florida
Statutes; (2) Chapter lOD-6, Florida Administrative Code; and (3)
Palm-Beach County Environmental Control Rule - 1, which regulate
the use and installation of individual. sewage disposal systems.
Rev.: NPBCP Amen 9_0 '
dment 9-
3-8
B-25C
ATTACHMENT B2-1D
The Future band Ilse El.emcut. o[ I:he Vi.llagc of NorLII I'alrn Beach
Compre':ensive Plan shall. be amended by adding page 3-11A, iahich
read: as Collows;
S ecial Policy ~i.8: Residential development on the property defined
l~ Amendment 92-1.2 on revised FIGURE 3r 10 shall be limited to a max-
imum of 98 residential uriits
Special Policy 5.9: Residential development on the property defined
by Amendment 92-1.3 on revised FIGURF 3 10 shall be limited to a
maximum of 232 units.
Special Policy 5.10: Residential development on the property defined_
by Amendment 92-1.4 on revised FIGURE 3 10 shall be limited to a
maximum of 184 units.
' Special Policy 5.11: Residential develol~menC_yn Ch~~roperty defined
by Amendment 92-1.SA on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a
maximum of 108 units.
Special Policy 5 12• Residential development on the property
dettned by Amendment 92-1..1 on Revised Figure 3-3 shall be
limited to_the existing 197 residential units
SLecial Policy 5.13: __Residential development on the property defin
l~Amendment 92-1.6 on Rev>sed Fi ure 3-12 shall be limited to the
existing 48 residential units.
Special Policy 5.14: Residential development in Planning Area 1
shall be clustered in the least env>ronment-illy sensitive portion
of the parcel which is the subject of an application for a
development order
Special Policy 5 15• Year round permanent re<;ident residential
development within the area defined by the current extent of John
D. MacArthur Beach State Park shall be limited to that provided
for Park personnel.
Rev: NPBCP Amendment 92-1; NPBCP Amendment 92-2
3-11A
B-25D
ATTACHMENT 'B2-lE
TABLE 6-1 '
NORT}~ PALM BEACH PUBLIC FACILITY
LEVEL OF SERVICF. STANDARllS
PUBLIC FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICF. STANDARD
POTABLE WATF;R AVERAGE DAY WATER 'CONSUMPTION RATE
Urban Service Resi_ d_ en_triyl _ gg gallons/Capita/ddy
urea only) Non-residential*-
1,874 gallons/acre/day
MAXIMUM DAY WATER CONSUMPTION RATE
Residential
Non- re- s a tial*? Za~$Zns/capita/day
gallons/acre/day
Storage Capaci.tY
Average Daily Flow x 0.5
(The above rates are to be used only as a planning guide for
the Village of North Palm Beach. Actual determination of
flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, and main
extension charges shall be negotiated by individual
property. owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority through the
Developer's Agreement process.) ,
SANITARY SEWER AVERAGE DAY SEWAGE GENERATION RATE
Urban Service Residential - 66
Area only) ----.__ gallons/capita/day
Non-residential*- 1,060 gallons/acre/day
MAXIMUM DAY SEWAGE GENE_ RATION RATE
Residential
Non- re- d tia104 9a~Z~ngallons/acre/day
(The above rates are to be used only as a planning guide for
the Village of .North Palm Beach. Actual determination of
flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, main
extension and tax charges shall be negotiated by individual
property owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority through the
Developer's Agreement process.)
SOLID WASTE AVERAGE GENERATION RATE
Resid___ e~tial ,
Single-family - 0.926 tons/capita/year
Multiple family- 0.588 tons/capita/year
Non-residential '
6.0 tons acre/year.
6-3 Rev: 10/16/89; NPI7CF'
}T-?Sli Amendment. 92-2
AT'T'ACHMENT ll2-1F
I'o]icY_1_n Ily FY 199p, update Village T,and Development
' Her~nl~t.ions to prohibit, the installaCi.on of arlditiona]- sepCic
Lank systems within th.e Village. Cur Cher, require all. nc~w
rlevelopmenCS within the des~nated Urban service Area to be
served by the central otable water and wastewater system. and
require-a}}_Hew-deve3opmente,-to-be-served-by-eentra~-pekable
systems. 1'he provision of water and wastewater services within
1']anninca Area 1 shall be governed by policy 6.2 of the Ca ital
]mprovements Element.
I?~licy___.1.5 Lly 1990, update Village Land Development
rr~rlulations to prohibit the instal.lat.ion of individual potable
water or irrigation wells i.n Planning Area 5, west. of North Lake,
a nrl Planning' Area 7, south of. Lighthouse Drive, clue to proximity
' to the one-foot drawdown contour (lone 3).
QIL1[;C'P.1VE_.~ 2: 1'he Village shall maintain a five-year schedule of
c.~I,it:a] improvements needs, to be updated annually, in conformance
wi t.h the CAPI'T'AL 1MI'ROVEMF.N'1's element. Capital improvements needs
are defined as: (].) those i.rnprovemenL-s necessary to correct
er.i:t:ing deficiencies i.n order to maxi.m.ize the use of existing
I:, c~i] it.ie~; or (2) t:hone improvement nece^cary to meet projected
future needs without encouraging urban sprawl..
Po]_icY__?.,1 Existing deficienci.e:: wi]1 be addressed by
unrlcrtakinq thc• fol]owi.ny act:.iVit.i.es:
Snnit,<~ry sewer- - Ity FY 19(11 cl imirwrl.ion of surf.acc water
t dir,charyc at the Anchoru]e Wastewater 'Treatment Plant and other
d~~tined sy;aem deficiencies will. be corrected according to the
lnoc}ram and r.chedule esCabl i~hed by tho .E;eacoast Ut i.l ities
, 6 ~
nn hnrify. ,. ~ ,... I,:
AT'PACHMENT B2-1G
TABLE it-1
NORTH PALM BEACH LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS
FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD
POTABLE WATER AVERAGE DAY WATER CONSUMPTION RATE
Urban Service Residential - 99 gallons/capita/day
Area only) Non-residential*- 1,874 gallons/acre/day
MAXIMUM DAY WATER CONSUMPTION RATE
Residential - 147 gallons/capita/day
Non-residential*- 2,7'82 gallons/acre/day
Storage Capacity
Average Daily Flow x 0.5
(The above rates are to be used only as a planning guide for
the Village of North Palm Beach. Actual determination of
flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, and main
extension charges shall be negotiated by individual
property owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority through the
Developer's Agreement process.)
SANITARY SEWER AVERAGE DAY SEWAGE GENERATION RATE
Urban Service Resi_ d_ entrial - 66 gallons/capita/day
Area only) Non-residential*- 1,060 gallons/acre/day
MAXIMUM DAY SEWAGE GENERATION RATE
Residential - 104 gallons/capita/day
Non-residential*- 1,721 gallons/acre/day
(The above rates are to be used only as a planning guide for
the Village of North Palm Beach. Actual determination of
flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, main
extension and tax charges shall be negotiated by individual
property owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority through the
Developer's Agreement process.)
r
SOLID WASTE AVERAGE GENERATION RATE
Residential
-- qle-family -
Multiple family-
0.926 tons/capita/year
0.588 tons/capita/year
1
Non-residential
6.0 tons/acre/year
11-9
B-25G
Rev: 10/].6/69 : NPUCP
AmendmenC. 92-7
ATTACF}MF,NT B2-11{
folic G.1:
FJor Lh Palm Beach Village
Urban Ser I'lanniny Areas
vice Area• 2-7
arc designaCed as the
I_c,li~ 6i2; Village F'lanni.nq Area .1, eha}1_ge_des4gnakad-a~s
a--Non--~erv3ee-AKea where the level of facilities and services pro_
vided by North Palrn Beach shall be limited to those currently pro-
vleied„ shall not be desi nested as an Urban Service Area. Notwith-
standi^ the above limitations, individual or acka e otable water
systems maZ be provided to -rccommudate allowable develo meat.
Further, package wastewater systems ma
___y be, provided to accommodate
allowable develo ment. ----
t_olScY 6.3: Consideration oC Lhe expan:;iun of the Villaye
Urban SerVice~Area shall be made coincident wi.t;h any annexation
actions.
1
11-13 RcV.: NPFIC I'
B-25H Amendment 92_2
~~
ATTACHMENT II2-2
1
cn j:
X
W
1:~
~ ~ N
1 ~ r1
~ CvC
1 N
1
~ :r
~ N
~ : M
!. v
4 Aqq
O F
pfpd
J C]J
a~~
v~o
~ .~ y
n ed.
Vaa
$ {11011 W
U
~ ~ },!-. ~~ •~ X34 L( ~LIAIJ
'. ~ .~
7
= O
4 ~
u ,,
,. m
~ W
...
a Y
= ~ /[~
<\
~-'
~
W
7
F
~ V
a
~
~_ O Q
a
9 0
a
~ .
O
~ zz
W
` '
tr- ~
...
~
i - ~y
i0 W
a li
W
W
O
~'
_
ZfA-
In a
. ? ¢ a °.
W
Y
a
z
/-
O
2
/A ~
gl
ro
J~
C
v
b
_~
m
N
a
N
.N
f. ?+
U1 sa
A O
E N
7 1~
•~ ro
'6 U
N
•~ v
~ i m
i ~ ~
V R:
n ~p
O G
~ 1> f6
a
"av
U1 N
b 1a
rr
i~w
W
a ~ Q
~
W
a N
y
>
C7
Z O ~ C1
z Z y Cl
Qa~,
z ~~+-
,J
a W ~
~
~
H
~
LL
W
N
N
N
1
O
W
c
0
E
v
c
m
E
Q
a
U
C]
a_
m
1
li
O
n
u_
7
J
w
0
n-2F
ATTACHMENT II2-2
1
cn j:
X
W
1:~
~ ~ N
1 ~ r1
~ CvC
1 N
1
~ :r
~ N
~ : M
!. v
4 Aqq
O F
pfpd
J C]J
a~~
v~o
~ .~ y
n ed.
Vaa
$ {11011 W
U
~ ~ },!-. ~~ •~ X34 L( ~LIAIJ
'. ~ .~
7
= O
4 ~
u ,,
,. m
~ W
...
a Y
= ~ /[~
<\
~-'
~
W
7
F
~ V
a
~
~_ O Q
a
9 0
a
~ .
O
~ zz
W
` '
tr- ~
...
~
i - ~y
i0 W
a li
W
W
O
~'
_
ZfA-
In a
. ? ¢ a °.
W
Y
a
z
/-
O
2
/A ~
gl
ro
J~
C
v
b
_~
m
N
a
N
.N
f. ?+
U1 sa
A O
E N
7 1~
•~ ro
'6 U
N
•~ v
~ i m
i ~ ~
V R:
n ~p
O G
~ 1> f6
a
"av
U1 N
b 1a
rr
i~w
W
a ~ Q
~
W
a N
y
>
C7
Z O ~ C1
z Z y Cl
Qa~,
z ~~+-
,J
a W ~
~
~
H
~
LL
W
N
N
N
1
O
W
c
0
E
v
c
m
E
Q
a
U
C]
a_
m
1
li
O
n
u_
7
J
w
0
n-2F
ATTACHMENT B2-3
iiiiiii~iii~iiii,l
FIGURE 3-2
a
a KEY:
~ITnfi li l?~1T~ Igtrrr rr rrn fl-. nnnnr _______--
'~'~, u 1; ~1°`d9i;-y;;. Corporat¢'Llmit
Rn(f~1Tti'Jy`7~ ~ 7~ $`~-'.JJ Planning Area boundary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,~ „` ti+'J~~,/ J~~~ Yu,;.. J,,.,~J.fy ~~~. Refer to Land Us¢ Tables 3-1 and 3 2
'~~ 1syS7~ J f L{x'1.3+~`' .j nf~~ Hist¢Y1C S1te
a ,f"J . Y
'~, + +j ~~~r, j~ ~'% ~; - jJ- - Florida state Hasler File Y - RPB 79
5 xJ?I4 ~i
',,','• I`i~'J y~A;~r~i'~kJ~~. ~3~.:' ~ . AMENDMENT 92-2:
~'. ~ !',; i#j1„~,`~ r ~~~"~Za' 3-2~-ariA-3-28 3-1 and 3-2
c f y ~3'r` , 'j~ ~1 ,f
o ~~ ,+St1-~ '
dd Td( ,~t/}t ~... ,Y 1'Y~lJ ~sy~x I ~!~ ~i~
.;
Pq ";µr3d,+l ~ s~YJ' ~
8P8215 ~' .C (1
'~~,. s'. J 'k ,y .
. ~ ,~; y v ~
'`'~ ~
.. „ ,.
:V,~, /.1 i~i. Yj y~
~ 8PB79 :}~ i ~ ~~~~, BP6214
(,i uQ1~3 "~ -~:~
~ ,"~CNr'~i ,.1 ,~,
4 J: i. '~ J
..+.. `+
'~,.~1 ~~ ~L1S 11/1111111 ~ IIIf1 1111th.
-l ~~ a
-~-}} '~ .1.
_1 ~ a PLANNING AREA 1
EARM RIVER c-,>• cA~u~ CON =~~ FUTURE LAND USE MAP
~ FUTURE LAND USE
1111L1 YVY~OY
-l ~~ MAP SERIES
-J-y 1LLL.1 'a 1999
J
'' NORTH PALM
-11y~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~isl~t~l~~~l~l~l~,BEACH rtoniw
~IIII ~
~ovec a, 1av, iY<.sn• 8 OFEET
Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 3-17
B-27
ATTACHMENT B2-'3A
NET ROAD
~:
y;y{;
~:. ,
~:~;;
., /,/~ .
'. ii
'~. ! ~ ~,
~[i~[ '':b itty
~r ~ ..
c~
[[ y
[~
~~.
~~
•~
i~
.[~
~~r
~~
NORTH F~AL;M
E3EACH rwniw
U 200 000 ~'lul+
FEET
i One[, [nv, ~n c,tc~•
FIGURE 3-3
I~L'Y:
Coc po[a to Limit ---------
Planning urea Wwtdacy uu unnun.nn
ttcCer to Lind Usc Tables 3-1 and.~3r2
Refec to Special F'o11cy 5.2 i~~~~<
ti-~'
I}'""`~"```"`f AMENDMENT 92-2:
~~k ~:4
€z~ ,w.;~,?~~'Y} ~-2~-and-3-28 3-1 and 3=2
s>;sa~.h..;~?~>
... h;..~:t~. 'E
.i?SCY Y3::
e~>~SS';~>' ..~
~i ~ Y~. #.
<; y
~~ ~~~ ,. ~
Ott
~:..
`.\a~\il~lyt\1~\. r-
t~~\\\~\[\\\: ~i ~l _
\ t\\\~~\.~ ~ FUTURE LAND USE M
'~~~lr,\t~\~;, '~ FUTURE LAND US
'~\\~\\~ \~~ ~ ';~ MAP SERIES
`~\ ~~ t\ t ~ \\ 'a 1999
~ ~ ~\ \~\~\\ \ \ ~ PLANNING AREA 2
O \\
£ Z \ \\ Sri
s ~ ~ \ i~,,
Y t ''~i
J \ \\ ~~ ~
i~
~~
i~
•~
[• ~~~
i~~,, [, irr,(
~ ~
• f
'~,T9ACO,QST^f ,f,,f,,f
i ~
' IYATF9~ [,[,,I, `
7 y ~~r
.,
.,
is
i~
r[
c~i
•~:
,,
3-18
Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 B-27A
A1'T ACIIM ENT B2-4
N
I
n1
~ N
I ~
'
' M ~
~-~
i = c
I n I
I ~ .r M
1 N
i;~ ~
,~ ~
d ~~
M ~-~ rn
W
• >- of z~
a w ~y Wa
~ .,$o ~ ro
Y ~ ra i
w
~
u, i
aZ~
n
j ~ ~ i
"€'O porn
.y ~
V
p
8Cb
V 7 W
U ~ a
a
aW
~ ~.
A Z W
z a a
Q J W. Q1
-~ W N' ~
W ~• 0.' r
~~.a
~ _ ~~
W LL
~~l
~~G
0~~~
V
3~
4
~~ : ~4
~~ ~
•, 4
,(
~(' ~
( e
y ~` C 4'
== 71111
..~
a
~
•~
o w
Q Z m ~
M W
Q N LL
W
a --o .
a
c~
Z_
z
z
Q
J
a
a
n
u
71
4
J
W
U
C
w
Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
3-19
B-28
ATTACHMENT B2!5
..cry.} t '" r~
" "1j7"~ " "'~ FIGURE 3-5
" ;~, ~~ +"' _ KEY: '
N!~, ~,:v .c ~ - .Corporate Limit
w9 - . ~:. -Planning Area Boundary ___ ...nnn
r n w::
:.. ` - . Refer to Wnd Use Tables 3-1 nd 3-2
' ..'.
1. ~.
. y
~.
~ aN ` AMENDMENT 92-2:
~`~ ' ~` ''~: ~-2~-and-3-28 3-1 and 3-2
.: , • ...
' `~
t ~ ~
~>.>.
' m
N a.
~ • • ~
s ::. { y . - i:: ~ O
N 1!, ; ~
i ~ '
~:;,. y
i< , y r ~ <.
:::~.v~ ,.::.:.. ; <.
• > ..
:':: '
+~'..i:~ .. S
N._ .
:N:: ~i : •~ .`~
C V.%:. i. jai :'~T:: i~:.'.~.•+ ~'tf~;~t
u* e....Las..::. .::: ~~;. ~.1:.
tia. :.:.. :.v. ^ . :..p~~~4
~ -
. y .....yy.. ,y. .
~ $~^~~kr,: ~Zs ~t~ ~~' ~''"::an FUTURE LAND USE.MAP
"~~:~* "t:~~ti."u' FUTURE LAND USE
t¢ , s....... .'. MAP SERIES
.:.. ' .::.:'<:;:e~; 1999
..
~~ <:f a 'e s :x: a ~• . r,
'; '~''""^r PLANNING AREA 36
r:•."
'.Rtr..., ,ez ~1R-C .
~ ~! ~ .,{l.. ..~..
-.ib' ~ C. 011 0
..:. ::::. ::: ..:..:. ~i~:
' 0:, ".
~:t.
s- NORTH PALM
BEACH FLORIDA
~1 EARMAN RIVER (C-17 CA NA LH~~
O 2l 0 ~ 8i0 10i 0
~ouecat ter, tr c.vee FEET
Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 3-20
~ B-29 I
ATTACHMENT~B2-6
(0
M
W
~.
w
0
J
m
W
X
a
x
H
K
2O
1
I
a
a
~
N M
~ w
o w
Q ~. ~
Z Q ' a Q
W •
~ • ~
w
oc ~ Q,.- ?
F ~ ,
h~ z
~ z
~:
' ~
W a
IL J
a
~ a ~'
Q ¢
a 9
-o
zx
F- U
o w -m
CIO
~o
-o
N
-O
r
0
u
Y
a
K
J
Wi
V
c
0
p
N
1
1 ~ N m
1 : 1'1
1 ~
1 .
:~ m
I
I;b
1 ~
.~
1 1
1 : m •• M
N
b 1 ~
4A N (tl
0
9 !-~ ~
~ (n
d F 1
„~~ z ~m
• w x
a~~ Q m
v z ~
"$°
V w ~ ~W-~ ro
8C~ L
/Z 1
M1
saw oR~H ~1cwW1
.....
1~AK~ W
.~~,~?5. ', .
a
U
a
z
T7
N
N
3-21
B-30
ATTACHMENT B2-7
., /,
-- r/,
•rf
• ~. ,~+ s T
i . ~ :a. . c._. • a
h `(.i f~ .J :t~^.~~
• h ~. in 4.
•~. h f., txfr st '~~~.• fr :'yj`'~A .yoZ t4 i~
r : .n i^ .:.i ~ ^ '
/; 1.1 . ~f~.~ 1 .
m V:`.• y iii t~, t.t~ ' ! •1 .
D G.,: ~ ~• ~: -11.. 311 t. ) 12ii • •^~ Kt:i ~~. :: ~ .
f) L ^. ~tj~lt't43.,;Z'Slt`•~Y. •~ 3`.N k•` .: ~~r .
/ .qty-. Gf.4 • t4 ~r ...j~stil.~.
a _ y. 43r t. V'
^, . 1^!f ~~~f
~/ Y i • ~ w Y~ r
Lt
tt ~ l a r~ a tS'A,y{~t(~
y { ~ w., Sl ~,f.\/t t.i as r rCO .r f+~ 1. •,~~r,d1{t
.< Y ; 1 T ~ t yf / `3k ~,' l f}~ ail!(i1
t ~ k.+. YS .s t ar y
ka ^~ `.i r .r ~ r. ' .. 1. i
;,,. c` ~ .f Sk, ~., r ....
.,
..:
., •t a.
.~ ~ :~i i
,,r':''~ v' ,•ci
1 :..rn .x
t.<f ;. ~ ;. _ < z
~, `i:
+. +i !. t
.. Y r of :.¢.5: ffi~ ~~R .~..;
~. .:. . ~..a ~.. '.
:. ... :. .1. r .
„ N ,~ `
~f .1 N' j. N .3 If ~~
~OVaCb la Y. 3ee•f/~~
FIGURE 3-7
KEY:
Corporate Limlt --------
Plannitg Area Boundary uu...n~......"
\ Refer Co Land Use Tables* 1 and 3-:
Historic Site
k, Florida Statc Hastcr Filc n - BPnlo~
ATF9W
qY
l
~°-~ AMENDMENT 92-2:
\ ~-2a-aAd-3-28 3-1 and 3-2
.~~
I
~8~107
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
FUTURE LAND USE
MAP SERIE$
1999
PLANNING AREA 4A
The Oakes Building
no longer in existe
however, reference
••-shall be retained u
deleted from the
Florida Master Site
File.
tNORTH PA
BEACH F~o~,.a.
slu slo ~ I o .
Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 j-za
B-31
1~'1"1'I+CHMEN'I' B2-£}
M
w
a
V
W
Y
i
I
I - (1 N
I
I
1 = v M
I c
I 'p
I ti G
~ ro
:~
N
a ~~
I
~ n M
v F N
c 1 ~
'~
$~ <v nl
., rn I
E ~ V ~T
°i ~
'a3 F I
.~ c o z
W rm
(C
A ~ ~ ~ ro
8 C ~. W I
C U z fF
C W ~
U L I
a ro
u ~ o x w ".wry ~r~.;'2..~~~
U
ro
a
N
C
QI
a
0
a
0
M ~
Nw
R O
d bl
4 d
U +~
d N
a v
1
..yv
N O N
I \ 5
Na
rn v
O C
F a~ ro
z a
wv
~ w v
A 9 4
z c ~
W 01 Y
~ ~
aaw
~ ~
a
Q
a 4
9
0
_~
'^
v/ ~ ~ O
w ~.. U
a a Q-oW
w Q to m W
v ~
LL
a a o
a a a -N
w ~ ~ -
o
a vi ai
~ »
Qrn
z a
Z J -~
~
W a
a ~ ~
~ t-
H ~
~ LL
LL
N
I
N
rn:
N
~.~ ~ i
O~
~ ~
«v
c ~
o w
EE
9 /L
C
oa b
U
Q ~ a
a ..
az.
V ' x
CI
a'o y
v
K
N ~
....r
> > ri
c N u
W r
0
O
3-23
B-32
ATTACHMENT H2-9
M
W
W
~"
W
Y
N
N
P
N
O
A
r
C
•
E
v
e
O
E
a
a
V
m
a
z.
•
1
i~l
~J
e
r
u
Y
7
a
J
W
U
O
a
Q 0 `~
a s o
~ 0
~
_W
~ c
U m
CC
W IY w
Q u.
(n ~ W
N d Z m-o
w a
~a
a ~
Q N
~
~ (
~
Z O ~ pa
Z Z
a O>
~
Z „
j J
J W W
~
a ~
~
~
t-
~
~
~
u.
3-29
t3-33
ATTACHMENT B2-10
i~
1
[OYI,C[, le Y~ IYCA/[[
~
~q ,.»:;:
j:<::
5j'i
u..:.:. -
"' Z
,
9
`
:.
.
~..
»:; 3 •:; ¢
''
..,::
.,.::;::;as.: .
j «. »:. a. ,.a:
-»
.
tc
~
R. N:
''
Y~
~ ..: -
~:~[:. V
r
F
WEST LAKE
::t.: ;~': ~~;::
~
:: r:, =
::w:
R
;i»:
:..
}j~ <
::;ail: ~: .n:
S<iP _ x
v ftf
~:~<g m
,
J:
`
:.
rl
::::.. S
<..
:~ .. .y;{.xa ~ r
~:. .:;2::~.~~: L
#:3y
v sT :F
iCY:. F
;:. y
FIGURE 3-11
KEY:
Corporate Limit ---------
Planning Area Boundary n,,,, o,,; n,,,u
Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2
~.
AMENDMENT 92-2:
~-2~-and-~-29.3-1 and 3-2
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
FUTURE LAND USE
MAP SERIES
1999
PLANNING AREA 6B
NORTH PA!_M
BEACH rLOplon
2I0 8I0 1 l 0
CCCT
PR OSPEnITY
nAnBOn
xevised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 3-26
B-39
N
r
x ~
U J
w W
m r
~ a
J
Q N O
a ~ a
= N
F' W O
~ ~ V
0
z ~ x
~ LL Q
W W
~ Cf
Q ~
J J
a
i ~
O
Z ~
.-~
I
N
# f~
~~~
,~.
ro
~-
v
a
~ °'~'
b
a ~
a
1
N
O~
a
B
v
a
d
o.
ro
i
i
I y
.r-1
E
va
v
OGEpN c a -'
pt~-pNt,C ~,~ 6 O
.~~ ~ U
r ..,~--' ~ ~ .
pPM
r6~
1
S
:'
x'
j
:!
1 ~
e .
~~
~;
a
m
v'
a
. •I
~~
'.Sf
'7
,1 ~ L'i,
;;4L~
=k
00 '+
N1~
~ ~ i
1 #
N
O~ y
# ~
~ ~
a ~
w '°
e ~
v °'
w
,~ a
N
N
1>
C
O1
ro
a
s
Q
a
U
a
z
ro
m
.~
a
~
1
2=3
B-35
1
a
a
Z
O
r
1
Q
~ J
W U
a oc a,
~ U ~
C7 rn
u. U r-
LL
LL
Q
'
`
e° i i
.
s
~S '' %
~ Z
r
~ ro
„~
~ ~ N
~° u ~
j> ~
~ [~
UI ~
i of
F N
N N
~
~
'~ O
i e ,..~ y
j ,
., H
~ : ~ P 2 ~ U W
_' c
~
Sc ~
~u ~
u a 5 a
~ U
u n H ~ ('. P
S 1Z 0
~ x a ~ ~ ~
~
$ ~ >•
F
~i i F~.a
i pp U
n U
W r
.' ~"
~1..-i K ~
ri ese"`e~~`
I ~
Oi ~y~.\~ ~~T~lTr~
#?' ~.
i ~~~~
'CS ''
~ ~ re/
N
ri
i
N
rn
a+
a
v
E
v
c
d
E
a
a
ro
~- - .-1
.-1 ~ 1 '.
i t
N ~
~ ~S~
01 #
#.c
' °'
~ +'
„
~ # a
~ ~ ~ ~
'b w ~
. ~' ~
~
a~ C1
a
a o
~. r,, x
b
~ _~
~ m I
V~ ~
s
~~~
a~°. ~+ee~e
~OPZ~
V~~~
OGEpN
!~
3j
I ~ ~
m~eumnn
t~O
e, M~
~!€€
~ i
O1
F
Ul
E
a
U N
fA ~
aN
zrn
v
N
N
.~
N
a
4-8
B-36
ATTACHMENT B2-13
Region (Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council); and
(4) the State Comprehensive Plan. '
5. Policy recommendations for the implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan; and "
6. The following elements: FUTURE LAND USE; HOUSING; TRAFFIC
CIRCULATION; SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE,
POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE;
COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; RECREATION .AND
OPEN SPACE; INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION; AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS .
Further, the following two provisions of Chapter 163, Florida
Statutes are emphasized by the State:
1. Local governments are charged with setting levels of ,
service for public facilities in their Comprehensive
Plans in accordance with which development must occur
and permits will be issued; and
2. Public facilities and services needed to support
development shall be available concurrent with the
impacts of such development.
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
~L
r_ J
].-2
B-37
ATTACHMENT B2-19'
' 1.6.9 Continuous Monitorina_.and Assessment
A formalized Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) is required to
be prepared every five years. However, the North Palm Beach
Comprehensive Plan should be continually scrutinized and reviewed
for current applicability. When additional issues or new
directions are defined, they should be #sincorpordted within the
Comprehensive Plan via the annual amendment procedures. Procedures
for incorporating amendments within the Village of North Palm Beach
Comprehensive Plan are included as Figure 1-4.
7~he Village will also coordinate data base collection activities
1
with Palm Beach County, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council,
its municipal neighbors, appropriate State agencies and any other
jurisdictions/entities that affect the growth and development
within North Palm Beach. These activities will enhance the
comprehensive planning process in general and foster increased
intergovernmental coordination activities.
1.6.5 Monitoring and Evaluating Capital Improvements
1
In addition to the general requirements for monitoring and
evaluation procedures identified in Chapter 9J5.005(7), Florida
F~dministrative Code, it is further required that the CAPITAL
IMF'I2OVEMEN~'S element be reviewed on an annual basis. Therefore,
tine Village shall review the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS element of the
Comprehensive Plan each year to evaluate and assess the need for
amendments thereto.
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
1-23
B-3B
ATTACHMENT B2-15
c.
d
e
f
g
h.
i.
j•
new developments to donate or provide a'.minimum 5% of '
the site for recreational purposes;
Protect environmentally sensitive lands designated on
Figures 3-13B and C of the Future Land Use Map Series;"
Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding
by requiring a minimum first floor elevation of 8.5 feet
NGVD and a drainage-system which meets adopted Level-of-
Service Standards;
Regulate signage;
Ensure safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and
vehicle parking needs;
Ensure that public facility, utility and service
authorization has been procured prior to issuing any
development order; '
Provide that development orders and permits, consistent
with Policies 5.1 and 5.2 of the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
element, shall not be issued which result in a reduction
of the levels of service for the affected public
facilities below the Level-of-Service (LOS) Standards
adopted in the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS element (Ref: Table
11-1); and
Provide for the proper maintenance of building stock and
property by continually updating and enforcing adopted
building, housing and related codes;
Designate an urban service area (Ref: Objective 6;
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS element); and '
Rev.; NPBCP Amendment 92-2
3-3
ATTACHMENT B2-16
1
1
n
to contaminate land and water resources by requiring said
businesses to notify the Palm Beach County Department of
Environmental Resources Management regarding the storage, use
and/or disposal of potentially hazardous or toxic substances: The
program shall be implemented by the Village through the annual
renewal of occupational licenses. Further, the Village shall, by
FY 1990, adopt the Palm- Beach County Wellfield Protection
ordinance.
Policy 2.3: The Village shall encourage, through its
participation on the Seacoast Utilities Authority Governing Board,
protection of potable water wellfields by regulatory authorities
having land use jurisdiction in aquifer recharge areas serving
Seacoast Utilities Authority systems.
Policy 2.4: The clearing of any land assigned a Conservation
Land Use category on the Future Land Use Map Series or Figure 3-
13B shall not be approved by the Village .until such time that
appropriate permits have been procurred, by the developer, from the
Palm Beach County Health Department and/or the Florida Department
of Environmental Regulation.
Policy 2.5: At the time of each required .Comprehensive Plan
u~~date, initially in FY 1994, the Village shall consider the need
for t-he identification, designation and protection of additional
Historically significant properties under the provisions of the
Standard Housing Code.
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
3-7
n_nn
ATTACHMENT 82-17
Snecial Policv 5.1: By FY 1992, investigate alternatives '
(e.g. transfer of development rights, land swap, donation, purchase
by a public or non-profit entity, etc.) available to the Village
to assure that Little Munyon Island is not developed in a manner
that is detrimental to the Lake Worth estuarine system and related
ecosystems.
~ecial Policv 5.2: Utilize the mixed-use provisions of the
Village's Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Ordinance as
a means of developing that portion of Planning Area 2 located east
of U.S. }iighway ~l and north of Monet Road (i.e. the Our Lady of
}~lorida Spiritual Center Parcel) in a transition mode from
Commercial (i.e. compatible to the C-B Zoning District) to '
Residential (i.e. compatible to the R2 Zoning District) running
from U.S. }iighway No. 1 east to Lake Worth. Maximum gross density
s}iall not exceed 10-11 DU/AC. Development of the property shall
be subject to the Village Council approval of site plan and PUD
applications.
Special Policy 5.3: As a means of preserving native
vegetative species in Planning Area 6A, require the use of the
Village Planned Unit Development Ordinance to cluster residential
units in defined buildable areas (i.e. all areas in Planning Area
6A are defined as "buildable", subject to the application of
Village Ordinances, with the exception of those delineated on the '
Mangrove Preservation Overlay; Figure 3-13-B).
Rev: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
3-10
$-91
ATTACHMENT B2-18
' Policv 3.1: Support residential beautification which is in
conformance with the Village Appearance Plan by annually providing
native plant materials, at reduced cost, to Village residents.
Policy 3.2: Require housing constzucton that ,is compatible
with the existing natural resources and service capabilities as
defined in the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION and SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE,
DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER RECHARGE elements
and which does not adversely impact environmental features by
implementing OBJECTIVES 1, 3, 4 and 5; FUTURE LAND USE element and
OBJECTIVES 3 and 5; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS element.
Policv 3.3: Require developers to. coordinate with the
' Village, through implementation of North Palm Beach Land
Development regulations, during the design and completion of
residential developments to assure that the Village and Planning
Area characteristics are maintained, and defined special housing
needs (i.e. determined at the time of required Comprehensive Plan
updates) are accommodated.
Policy 3.4: Provide, by FY 1990, innovative housing
alternatives (e.g. reduction of minimum lot and housing unit size
requirements, density bonuses, use of the Z -lot and zero-lot line
development concepts, transferring development rights from
environmentally sensitive lands in Planning Area 6A, etc.) oriented
' to facilitating reduced housing costs. Any increases in density
preeurred incurred by transferring development rights off-site (i.e. from
Rev.: NBPCP Amendment 92-2
S-,
B-92
ATTACHMENT B2-19
Policy_3,8: IIy FY 1990, adopt an adult congregate facilities '
ordinance oriented to meeting the needs of elderly or handicapped
Village residents.
Policy 3.9: By FY 1991, review land development regulations
and permit review process related thereto for the purpose of
eliminating excessive requirements and supplementing existing
requirements in order to increase private sector participation in
meeting defined housing needs.
OBJECTIVE 4: Provision shall be made, by FY 1990, for the location
of Daycare and Group Home facilities licensed by the Florida
Department of }tealth and Rehabilitative Services in a manner
consistent with the character of existing neighborhoods.
Yolic 4.1: The Village shall review, and amend, by FY 1990, '
Communit Residence Home Facilities
the Zoninq Code so that different c asses of Gip-Home` fac31- rues
that foster non-discrimination and encourage the development of
community alternatives to institutionalization, as required by
Cha t. 919, Florida Statutes
-i - r• -- 1-~G9- are permitted in appropriate residential
neighborhoods, and that no appropriate residential neighborhoods
are closed to such facilities.
Policy 4.2: The )3Buildi~ng e0fficial shall monitor the
development and distribution of Daycare facilities and group homes
to insure that adequate sites and infrastructure are provided and
that over-concentration (i.e. to be defined by implementing Policy
a.l) in any residential area is avoided. '
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
-7
B-93
ATTACHMENT B2-20
1
1
hol_i~ l.h By FY 1990, update Village Land Development
Regulations to prohibit the installation of additional septic tank
systems within the Village and require all new developments to be
served by the central wastewater system and require all new
developments to be served by central potable water systems.
Policy 1.5 By FY 1990, update Village Land Development
regulations to prohibit the installation of individual potable
water or irrigation wells in Planning Area 5, west of North Lake,
and Planning Area 7, south of Lighthouse Drive, due to proximity
to the one-foot drawdown contour (Zone 3).
OBJECTIVE 2: The Village shall maintain a five-year schedule of
capital improvements needs, to be updated annually, in conformance
with the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS element. Capital improvements needs
are defined as: (1) those improvements necessary to correct
existing deficiencies in order to maximize the use of existing
facilities; or (2) those improvements necessary to meet projected
future needs without encouraging urban sprawl.
Policv_2_1 Existing deficiencies will be addressed by
undertaking the following activities:
Sanitarv Sewer - By FY 1991 elimination of surface water
1
discharge at the Anchorage Wastewater Treatment Plant and other
defined system deficiencies will be corrected according to the
program and schedule established by the Seacoast Utilities
Authority.
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
6-5
8-94
ATTACHMENT B2-21
Shortage Emergency Provisions, established under Chapter 40E-21, '
Florida Administrative Code. upon declaration of a water shortage
emergency by the South Florida Water Management District.
Policv 7.2 By Fy 1990, Xeriscape Landscaping practices shall
be incorporated within the Village Land Development Regulations as
a means of minimizing future irrigation water needs.
Policy 7.3 By implementing the Plumbing Code, the Village
shall require the use of low volume fixtures.
Policv 7.4 As a means of conserving potable water
'resources, the Village shall continue to uselsurface water from the
C-17
-Ty=~B~canal to irrigate the following areas: parks and recreational
areas; municipal areas; median strips along U.S. Highway No. 1 and
NorthlaY.e Boulevard; and the North Palm Beach Country Club.
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
V
6-14
B-45
ATTACHMENT B2-22
' Polite 3, 1: Institute emergency water conservation techniques
and programs under the direction of South Florida Water Management
District, as per Chapter 40E-21, Florida Administrative Code.
Policy 3.2: Current per capita consumption rates indicate
that there is no need to reduce water usage within the Village
during the 1989-1994 period.
OBJF,CTIVE 4: Conserve soil and native plant communities and
remove and prevent the spread of invasive exotic plant species.
Policv 4.1: By FY 1992, develop erosion control plans for
areas experiencing continued- erosion of shoreline or banks,
' including Lakeside Shere Park (FY 1990) and the C-17 Canal (FY 1992).
Policv 4.2: By FY 1990, land development regulations sh all
incorporate: (1) the requirement that all-applications for new
development contain an inventory of native plant communities and
endangered species and a program for the preservation thereof; (2)
a statement regarding the suitability of soils for development; and
(3) the prohibition of planting exotic, invasive plant species and
a program for the removal thereof.
Policv 4.3: The Village shall continue its annual program of
exotic plant species removal and/or trimming on public lands with
the Village limits.
' Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
B-~ Rev: 11/1/B9
B-46
ATTACHMENT B2-23
O3JF,CTIVE 5: Conserve and protedt fish and wildlife and their
habitats. '
Policy 5.1: 6y FY 1990, expand Chapter 5, Article IV, Section
5-101 of the Village's Code of Ordinances (Marine Sanctuary) to
more specifically define the intent and jurisdictional applications
of the ordinance, including., fisheries and manatee protection.
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
1
£3-5 Add: 11/1/II9
B-97
ATTACHMENT B2-29
10.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
1
Policy 1.3: Notify the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
OBJECTIVE L•_ 1•Iaintain planning coordination with adjacent
municipalities, Palm Beach County, the Palm Beach County School
Board and current service providers. _ "
Policy 1.1: All relevant information necessary for review and
comment by affected governments shall be supplied by the Village.
Policv 1.2: Notify Lake Park,. Palm Beach Gardens, Riviera
Beach, Palm Beach County, the Palm Beach County School Board and
municipal service providers regarding pending land use amendments
or land development decisions within North Palm Beach. Forma],ly
notify appropriate governments of pending planning or development
activities on lands adjacent to their borders, including the need
for additional intergovernmental coordination mechanisms. Comments
' regarding the impacts upon adjacent municipalities shall be
formally considered by the Village prior to making a land use
planning or development decision in these areas. If the Village
and the commenting municipality cannot devise the means to jointly
mitigate perceived adverse impacts, the Village shall initiate a
request for mediation services offered by the Palm Beach County
Planning Council and/or the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council.
Council during the Village land development decision-making process
and provide an opportunity for their review and comment.
Policv 1.9: By FY 1991, prepare and adopt an official
' annexation policy using methods and guidelines established by the
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 9?.-2
10-2
B-98
A'T'TACHMENT BZ-25
Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council in its annexation policy,
adopted in
May, 1988. '
Policy 1.5: Continue the current level of participation in
the implementation of the Palm Beach County Housing Assistance
flan by updating and executing the current Interlocal Agreement
upon request by the Palm Beach County Department of Community
Development. Further, by 1994, participate with other local
governments, under the direction of Palm Beach County, to develop
and implement a "fair-share" program to address countywide low and
moderate income housing needs, including financing mechanisms and
incentives and participation in State and/or Federal subsidy
programs.
1
Policy 1_6: By FY 1990, request the Florida Department of
Health and Rehabilitative Services for assistance to revise the
Village Zoning Code to provide greater opportunities in North
Palm Beach for Group Home facilities.
Policy 1_7: By FY 1992, request the Palm Beach County Solid
Waste Authority to jointly develop a pilot program for toxic
waste separation and collection within the Village.
-Polcy_ 1.8: Within one year following completion of the
survey of Village residents (Ref: Policy 6.1; RECREATION AND OPEN
SPACE element) and pending its results, contact the Benjamin School '
regarding the implementation of a joint-use arrangement as a means
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
10-3
n_no
A'I'7'ACHM L•'NT B2-26 (Deletions)
' undivided County Urban Collector to a 3-lane undivided
County Urban Collector;
3. Widening of the Prosperity Farms Road segment from Burns
Road to PGA Boulevard, from a 2-lane undivided County
Urban Collector to a 5-lane undivided County Urban
Collector.
All of the above improvements are scheduled for implementation by
Palm Beach County in the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Procxram.
Pe}3ev-3:3~--g'~ie-~7#}}eqe-hereby-adepts-the-€e}}awing-}rater#m
Ave rage--Al3Waal---D~-ri3~•/-Peak--Hear-3~OSr- statada~ds--€o~=~eaelr - } }sted
£ae#}3ty-type;-w4th-the-exeeptien-a€-P~esper}ty-Farms-Ready
a- Eotrr*t~-Col-beet-or -r-oaciways---- bO&-Stanc}arc}-EfPea}~-Hear
H
' b: State-M-i-no-r--hr-t-e-r-i~a-1--r~-},OS-6tandard-EfFeak
Hetlr-B '
e- Stag-Fr=ineipa}-Ar~teria€-~oad~ay~s-----h(1S-Standard
6fFeak-Hear-B
F9136Y--1- 2-r---`FkTe-~-13-1-shy}},--'13y'-~~L--~39~,---pkl~'-9tke--tkle
ex~mptieu-e€-SR-~rlA--€-rom--t-he--T,oS-~t-anda.r~}.-r-ec~€r^~:_r~b -c}ue-to-#ts
u a i qu e - exrvi~onme~ata-1- ins i-t-i~3~~- -by- -pet i~ i or~i rac,~. -€o~ - u Een stra i n ed
F a s i } i ty L --or--uSpeo is b - ~-ra-xrs}~r~ta~-io~r -A-rea'L - des3gt~at3 oa--33y-- FB9T
ancifer-'!Geegraph#e-Area-e€-Exempt€enu-by-the-6exntyr
Fe€ iev--~.-3 >----4'~-ie--V #} }age--slta-bb--reta-i-rr-the--ne€ghberheed
ehar-aeter-e€-Presper#tp-Farms-Reael-Hp-aeiept4ng-an-Inter#m-Average
Annual-Aa~l-y IAS~-tand~~rd-f}/-~>ea~c-Heu~-B- €csr~-Yri-s--z~oadwa~-arlt3i-the
' effects-e€--I~i33<1~out--and--t-t~-widen~r3g--e€--)iot#t-,fiI~-T~I~-FA€t}-and
Military-Tr-of€-can-be-evaluated:
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
4-2
B-50
ATTACHMENT B2-26(Additions)
Polic 1.1: Based u '
*~n the l~aa Florida Highway System Plan
Village roadways shall be functionally grouped based upon the num
Uer of traffic signals per mile as follows
a. Group A - County Road A-1-A•
b. Group B - Prosperity Farms Road•
c. Group C - U.S. Highway No 1 and Northlake Boulevard and
d. Villag e Collector - Lighthouse Drive
The Building Official may require traffic impact analyses prepared
pursuant to the Village Concurrency Management Ordinance to account
for adjustments to the functional group classification of a partic
ular roadway necessitated by the placement of additional traffic
signals along classified roadways. If said adjustments result in a
[unctional group other than A B C or Village Collector then level
of service analyses shall be based upon the 1988 Florida Eliahway '
System Plan Level of- Service Standards and Guidelines Manual
Policy 1.2: The Village hereby adopts Averse Annual Daily/Peak
Hour LOS Standards, consistent with the Florida De artment of Trans-
~ortation minimum acceptable operating levels of service standards
for each of the following roadwaYS•
a. County Road A-1-A• D/D•
b. Prosperity Farms Road• D/D•
c. U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake Boulevard• D/D and
d. Lighthouse Drive- D/D
7_he evaluation of current and projected levels of service on func
tionally grouped roadways shall be based upon Level of Service D
traffic volumes in TABLES 9-1 and 4-2 Furthermore should the
level_ of services on County Road A-1-A fall below D/D the Village
shall pursue a "Constrained Facility" designation thereon
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
9-2
B-51
ATTACHMENT B2-26 (Additions Continued)
' Policy 1.3: Prior to permitting any additional expansion of
Prosperity Farms Road, the Village shall reevaluate Level-of-Service
Standards thereon. Further, in order to maintain the residential
character of the Village, all roadways not identified in Policy 1.1
shall be maintained as two-laned roadways.
1
Rev.: NPBCP Amendment 92-2
9-2A
B-52
ATTACHMENT B2-27
TAE?LE 4-1
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALF1 E~EACH
GEPJERALI~ED DAILY LEVEL OF SEF.VICE 14AXIf9Ui~1 VOLUt9ES
Group :; - 0.0 to 0.75 Signalized Intersections per Mile '
Road~,t~ay; County Road AIA CCR AlA?
Lane=_./ I Level of Service
Type f A 6 C D E I
2/Undiv. 13700 15000 15600 16.,00 17400
3/Undiv.- 17125 18750 19500 2UE•25 21750
4/Llndiv. 28310 30305 31350 33155 34865
5,'Undiv.~?~ 29800 31900 33000 34900 36700
4/Div. 29800 31900 ~~3000 34900 36700
6/Div. 45400 48100 49700 52400 55200
Group B - 0.76 to 1.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile
F,oadway: Prosperity Farms Read Ca! current signa.lization)
Lane=_.: I Level o{ Service I
Type 1 A 6 C: D E I
---------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
2/Undiv. 9000 13700 14500 15300 16100
~:!Llndiv.~ 11250 17125 18125 IS125 20125
4/Undiv. 19000 20^^215 2S'450 30875 32300
SlUndiv.~~ 20000 29700 31000 32500 34000
4%Div. 20000 29700 31000 .2500 34000
•/Div. 30600 45100 46700 48900 51200 ,
Group C - 1.6 to 2.5 8iyna.lized Intersections per Mile
Rccd~;day: Ci) U.S. Hiyhaaay 1 i"R 5) .
%2> Northla.ke Boulevard iSR 8.°_:i~)
(3i Prosper i ty Farms Road t!~.r!addi t : onal S i yr~a l
~~.ne=_, I Level of `_"erV i re I
T±'pe I A~}3 B C C' E i
E:/Undiv.+ - 12750 16875 I~~OU ~-~6~~°_
4/Llndiv. - 21650 28025 30115 317.:0
5/Undiv.~?: -- 22800 29500 31700 33400
4/Ci i v . - 22800 2S'500~ ~ 1'0•^_• =:~ 400
=./Div. - 351 U0 X5000 47•;00 503nn
.!Illaya Collector
^'oada!ay: Liyhthou="e Drive
L_u,e=. I Level ,-.,{ 'aer•: i =_
Typ= I Asp. B}x>r - - _
2:L!r:di~,,, - - ,FOCI ii_00 1~90D
_yUn~i~..; - - 562 I4`C!0 i._1~~
- Assume three lane Capacity at 12~ percent o{ _ t,.,~r-lsne
-e.paCl ~;r {a.rillty.
_ 4=_.sumed 5 lane undivided {aciity eGua., tc ~ 4 c.._ d,..,ided
{a.rili'v.
}~~: I{ -"!~it is assumed that the LOS indi.-_a.ted cannot Ge .;.c`,i: ~.
Source: Florida. Highway System F1 ?. r. Level o{ Service ?~tandarde~
.nd Guidel ine=. Manual , F1 []opt, of Tra.nspor t>tior~, ]'=:_'_!
Addendum: NPRCP Amendment 9?-?. 9-9_
ATTACHMF.MT B2-28
TABLE 4-2
4? I LLAGE C1F NC?P, T H FALi1. E:EACH
r_,EhtEPALI~EC? PEAK HUUR LEl!EL OF SERVICE P'LAa;It1LR°1 l!ULUMES
' Group A - U.U to U.?~ Signalized Intersections per P1ile
F,o~da.~ay: County Road AlA (CR AlA)
La.ne~~ I Level of Service 1
Type I
---------- --- A
------ E
--------- -- C
------- ---- D
----- ---- E_ I"
-----
---------- ---
2iUndiv. ------
131G --------- --
1440 ------- ----
1490 ----- ----
1580 -----
167U
3/Undiv.± 1638 1800 1862 1975 2088
4/Undiv. 2717 2916 3012 3182 3354
/Undiv.} 2860 3070 3170 335U 3530 ,
4/Div. 2E:6U 3070 3170 3350 3530
6/Div. 435U 4620 4770 5030 5300
Group E - 0.76 tr. 1.5 Signalized Inter=_.ections per t~1ile
Roada!ay: Prosp erity Farms Road C~ curr ent siynal ization)
Lane<_./ I Level of Service 1
Type I
---------- ---
---------- --- A
------
------ E
--------- --
--------- - C
------- ----
------
---- G
----- ----
---- ---- E I
-----
-----
1'Llr,d i v . ~:?G 1310 -
1390 -
1470 1 540
3/Undiv, 1082 1648 1738 1835 125
4/Undiv. 1824 2708 2822 2964 3106
5%Undiv,« 19:0 285U 2970 3120 3270
4IGiv. 1920 2E50 2970 3120 3270
'
~./D i v . 29C:0 4330 4480 4700 491 0
Group C: - 1.6 tc~ 2.~ ~:ignalized I ntersections per toile
Ro~.d~n~a.x': (i) tI.S. Hiyhwa.y I (SR 5>
t2) tdorthlake Eo ulevard CSP, 850)
C3) Prosperity Farms Rd. {,.N,~a.ddi t i onal si yna.l )
Lanesi ! Level of Service I
TYpe 1 A>:st E C D E I
---------- ------ -
3i Undiv . + - --------- --
1 225 ------- ---
1013 ------ --
17:'5 -------
1388
4%'Undiv. - 2080 2688 282t• 3050
%Undiv.;} - 2190 2830 3U4U 3210
4/Div. - 2190 2830 3040 3210
=~%D i ~:~ . - 3370 4320 4600 4$30
!.!illaye Collectc,r
Road!,,, .y : Lighthouse C?r i ~,e
Lane=:' I Level of Service - 1
Type I A~~a E~t* C 0 E I
-;!Ir~di~... - - 730 1110 -- --- 124n
_iUnri•, ... - - 912 1388 1550
' a%Undi , . - - _C:'i0 35?U 3850
- :;=Some tlu ~e 1 ane =aCiac I ty a.t 125 percent of a. #!<!o-Lane
~~` A=_.=.ume~ 5 lane un~~i'vided facility equal to = 4 lane divided
?~..ri 1 i ty.
]~ -', it ~_ _.==.umed that the LOS indicated _annot be a.chie'.'ed.
'=:nuf ~ e : FI or i da Hi rha.~~; _ "tom F'18n Level ~f Serv j.C:~ Sta.nda.rd=
'denduro: 1JPRC[' _.nd Gu ' - _. `. ~ ~~ . _; .. _... `-
. .... .. ... ..... .~-. -. i ~~. r, .. t`13.n u...l , Fl C':_ F .- sp r.!. s _. ~ :~ pn ~ :'- _
ATTACHMENT B2-29
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE '
1.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1-1
1.1 CHAPTER 163.3161 - 163.3215, FLORIDA
STATUTES 1-1 -
1.2 CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1-3
1.2.1 Format Requirements 1-3
1.2.2 Data and Analysis Requirements 1-4
1.2.3 Level of Service Standards
Requirements 1-5
1.2.4 Internal Consistency Requirements 1-6
1.2.5 Plan Implementation Requirements 1-6
1.2.6 Monitoring and Evaluation
Requirements 1-7
1.2.7 Procedural Requirements 1-8
1.3 COMPONENTS OF THE NORTH PALM BEACH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1-10
1.3.1 Goals, Objectives and Policies 1-10
1.3.2 Capital Improvements Implementation 1-11
1.3.3 Monitoring and Evaluation 1-11
1.3.4 Maps•Showing Future Conditions 1-11
1.3.5 Comprehensive Plan Adoption
Ordinance 1-11
1.4 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION 1-11 ,
1.5 PLANNING PERIOD 1-11
1.6 MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROCEDURES 1-14
1.6.1 Citizen Participation 1-15
1.6.2 Updates to Baseline Data and
Objectives 1-21
1.6.3 Obstacles, Problems and Achievements 1-22
1.6.9 Continuous Monitoring and Assessment 1-23
1.6.5 Monitoring and Evaluating Capital
Improvements 1-23
1.6.6 Measurability 1-29
1.6.7 Consistency with the State of Florida
Comprehensive Plan 1-30
2.0 VILLAGE CS{ARACTER STATEMENT 2-1
3.0 FUTURE LAND USE 3-1
3:1 INTRODUCTION 3-1
3.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 3-1
3.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 3-2
3.4 FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 3-11
- 3.5 FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 3-11
3.5.1 Future Land Use Map Series 3-12
3.5.2 Natural Resources Maps 3-12
3.5.3 Future Annexation Area Map 3-15
B-55
ATTACHMENT B2-30
' 4.0 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 4-1.
4.1 INTRODUCTION 9-1
4.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 4-1
4.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 4-1
4.4 FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP .~. 4-7
5.0 HOUSING 5-1
5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1
5.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 5-1
5.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 5-2
6.0 SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE,
POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER
AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT 6-1
6.1 INTRODUCTION 6-1
6.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 6-1
6.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 5-2
7.0 COASTAL MANAGEMENT 7-1
7.1 INTRODUCTION 7-1
7.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 7-1
7.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 7-1
8.0 CONSERVATION 8-1
8.1 INTRODUCTION 8-L
' 8.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 8-1
8.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 8-1
9.0 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 9-1
9.1 INTRODUCTION 9-1
9.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT .. 9-1
9.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 9-1
10.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 10-1
10.1 INTRODUCTION 10-1
10.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 10-1
10.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 10-2
1.1.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS . 11=1
11.1 INTRODUCTION 11-1
11.2 VILLAGE GOAL STATEMENT 11-1
11.3 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 11-1
11.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 11-13
11.4.1 Five-Year Schedule of Improvements 11-13
11.4.2 Operational Impacts of Proposed
Capital Improvements 11-13
11.4.3 Implementation, Monitoring and
Evaluation 11-13
APPENDIX Al: AMENDMENT NPBCP 90-1 Al-]
APPENDIX A2: AMENDMENT NPBCP 90-2 A2-1
APPENDIX B1: AMENDMENT NPBCP 92-1 B -1
APPENDIX B2: AMENDMENT NPBCP 92-2 B-19
' Rev.; NPBCP Amendment 92-2
B-56
ATTACHMENT B2-31
LIST OF TABLES
?~n3sr,r__-__---___-- PncE
]-1 Consistency Matrix Key 1-32
3-]. Future LandUse Classification System 3-13
3-2 Map Key: Future Land Use Map Series 3-14
3-3 Wetland and Coastal Habitat 3-31
3-4 Species List by Habitats 3-32
3-5 Soil Type-Characteristics 3-35
3-6 Flood Zone Map Key and Explanation of Zone
Designations 3-37
4-1 Villaae of North Palm Reach Generalized nails
9-2 Village of North Palm B ach Generalized Peak
Hour Level of Service Maximum Volumes 4_ip
6-1 North Palm Beach Public Facility Level of
Service Standards 6-3
9-1
11-1
11-2
Recreation and Open Space Facilities
l.eve]-of-Service Standards 9-4
Nort1~ Palm Beach Level-of-Service Standards .
5-Year Schedule of Improvements, 1990-1995
11-8
11-15
Rev.; NPBCP amendment 92-2
Rev.: 11/1/£39
1
L
1
B-57
4.0 TR,/~FFIC CIRCULATION*
1
"Preparation of this document Han aidod tlirnugl~
financial asnlntanoe roceived from tl~a Stnto
of Florida under the Local Government Compro-
]ienaive Planning Assistance Program auttwrleed
by Chapter 86-16?, LaHa of Florida and admini-
stered by tho Florida Dopartmont of Community
Affairs."
* This Element completely revised
as per Policy 1.5 (page 9-3) of
the Village of North Palm Beach
Comprehensive Plan; 3/92
4.0 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
' 4.1 INTRODUCTION
The TRAFFIC CIRCULATION element is required to be included within
the Comprehensive Plan per requirements of State planning law and
rule criteria. Specifically, Chapter 163.3177(6)(b), Florida
Statutes, establishes the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Element requirement
and Chapter 9J5.007, Florida Administrative Code, establishes
minimum criteria to guide its preparation.
This element contains a summary of the data, analyses and support
documentation necessary to form the basis for TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
goal, objectives and policies.
In keeping with the requirements of Chapter 9J5.005 and 9J5.006
Florida Administrative Code, the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION element is
structured according to the following format:
o Traffic Circulation Data;
o Traffic Circulation Analysis; and
o Traffic Circulation Goal, Objectives and
Policies (Ref: Section 4.0; Village Comprehensive
' Plan document).
An essential basis for planning traffic circulation systems within
the Village is the FUTURE LAND USE element. Initial traffic volume
data is presented on a roadway link basis; however, where
necessary, specific references are made to Village Planning Areas
(Ref: Figure 3-9; FUTURE LAND USE element) as ,a means of targeting
potential problem areas or opportunities. Use of the seven
planning areas will allow: (1) detailed analysis of the potential
development or redevelopment activity that could increase traffic
generation; (2) specific delineation of growth areas, and (3)
detailed discussion of the growth impacts bn the roadway system.
This level of detail is important to the development of objectives
and policies in that localization of issues can be identified and
targeted.
4.2 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION DATA SUMMARY
In order for the Village to plan for its future, it must assess the
capability of its existing traffic circulation system to serve
current demand. The ability of the traffic circulation system. to
promote movement of people, goods and services, while maintaining
accessibility among the various land use activities, will determine
overall system effectiveness.
' 7'he inventory of the existing traffic circulation system has been
prepared to establish the basis for (1) Examining current roadway
deficiencies; and (2) Initiating plans to serve future growth and
development. Roads located within the Village include those which
9-1
are maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation (State
Road), Palm Beach County (County Road), or the Village .(all the
remaining roads not privately owned). '
4.2.1 Roadway Classifications
The Village's roadways are classified according to the followirig
FDOT Roadway Functional Classification System, as required by
Chapter 9J-5.007(1)(b), FAC.
Limited Access Facility - Roadways designed for through traffic,
over, from or to which users have no greater than a limited right
or easement of access (e.g. an expressway, I-95).
Arterial Roads - Routes providing service which are relatively
continuous and of relatively high traffic volume, long average trip
length, high operating speed and high mobility importance. Itt
addition, every United States numbered highway is an arterial road.
Urban Principal Arterial Roads - Routes which generally serve the
major centers of activity in an urban area, the highest traffic-
volume corridors and the longest trip purpose and carry a high
proportion of the local urban area travel on a minimum of mileage.
The routes are integrated internally between major rural
connections. '
Urban Minor Arterial Roads.- Routes which generally interconnect '
with and augment urban principal arterial routes and provide
service to trips of shorter length and a lower level of travel
mobility. Such routes include all arterials not classified as
"principal" and contain facilities that place more emphasis on land
access than the higher system.
Collector Roads - Routes providing service of relatively moderate
average traffic volume, moderately average trip length and
moderately average operating speed. Such routes also collect and
distribute traffic between local roads or arterial roads and serve
as a linkage between land access and mobility needs.
Local Roads - Routes providing service which are of relatively low
average traffic volume; short average trip length or minimal
through-traffic movements and high land access for abutting
property.
4.2.2 Roadway Description
The-Village of North palm Beach contains arterials (i.e., urban
principal roadways), collectors and local roadways, but does not
contain any limited access facilities. Also, ports, airports, rail
lines, high-speed rail lines or related facilities are not found in t
the Village and will not be considered further herein.
9-2
Primary north-south access to, from and through various portions of
' North Palm Beach is provided by U.S. Highway 1, SR AlA (N. Ocean
Boulevard) and Prosperity Farms Road. U.S. Highway 1 carries the
greatest volume of traffic through the Village and is classified as
an urban principal arterial road. U.S. Highway 1 is presently a
six-lane, divided facility from the Village's south corporate limit
to Parker Bridge at the Intracoastal Waterway. It is a four-lane,
divided road from this bridge to the Village's north corporate
limit. U.S. Highway 1 extends through Palm Beach County from north
to south and continues northward up the eastern seaboard of the
United States.
Both Prosperity Farms Road and State Road (SR) AlA are classified
as county urban collectors. Prosperity Farms Road runs through the
western portion of North Palm Beach, dividing Planning Areas 6 and
7, and into neighboring Lake Park to the south and Palm Beach
Gardens and unincorporated Palm Beach County to the north.
Originally, it was a two-lane facility with the roadway segments
within the Village recently expanded (i.e. 12/91). The segment
from Northlake Boulevard to Eagle Way has been improved to a five-
lane, undivided. The segment from Eagle Way to Burns Road has been
improved to three lanes, undivided. The segment from Burns Road to
PGA Boulevard was improved to five-lane, undivided.
SR AlA (N. Ocean Blvd.) is a two-lane undivided road within the
' corporate limits of North Palm Beach. This road extends the entire
length of Singer Island connecting to Blue Heron Boulevard in
Riviera Beach with PGA Boulevard. Of the north-south arterials
within the Village it carries the least volume of traffic.
Northlake Boulevard, like U.S. Highway 1, is classified as an urban
principal arterial road. It is the primary east-west road
providing access to and from the Village of North Palm Beach.
Northlake Boulevard is a six-lane, divided road in the Village.
Much of the traffic on Northlake Boulevard, as well as U.S. Highway
1, is generated outside of North Palm Beach.- U.S. Highway 1 is the
eastern terminus of Northlake Boulevard while the western terminus
continues five miles beyond Beeline Highway.
Lighthouse Drive is considered by the Village as a two-lane,
undivided collector road. Lighthouse Drive traverses the Village
in an east-west direction connecting U.S. Highway 1, Prosperity
Farms Road and Alternate AlA (i.e. to the west of the Village
limits). ,The Village has recently applied to the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) to have both of this roadway's
segments included within the Functional Highway Classification
System as a city collector.
Anchorage Drive loops through major residential areas of the
Village and traverses Lighthouse Drive, collecting substantial
' local traffic. Anchorage Drive connects. at two points with U.S.
I3ighway 1 and is classified as a local road.
4-3
The bridge on U.S. Highway 1 at the Intracoastal Waterway is the '
only Bascule bridge within the Village. When the bridge is in the
open position, congestion and stacking of traffic can occur. The
Village Public Safety Department has direct communication
capability with the operator of this facility in case of emergency
to assure that the bridge can be .properly controlled. The
remainder of the streets in North Palm Beach are classified as
"local" streets.
Table 4-1 characterizes major roads in the Village, including the
State functional classification, segment, location, laneage,
maintenance responsibility and right-of-way easements. Figure 4-1
identifies the location, laneage, and configuration of the existing
functional roadways.-
4.2.3 Traffic Volumes
Traffic counts are taken at selected locations on the principal
street system within the West Palm Beach Urban Study Area (WPBUSA).
The primary stations are located at designated north-south and
east-west "screenlines." Volumes aggregated at these locations
aid in determining laneage requirements necessary to maintain a
designated level of service. Counts are also taken at selected
"point" locations along-major thoroughfares and intersections of
interest.
Agencies that administer traffic count programs are the Palm Beach ,
County Engineering Department, the Florida Department of
Transportation, the City of West Palm Beach, the City of Boca Raton
and the Town of Palm Beach. Each maintains a count program and
cooperates with the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of
Palm Beach County to provide data for the long-range transportation
planning process.
in an effort to capture seasonal variations that occur and arrive
at Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes for a given calendar
year, a 24-hour count is taken during the first (peak season) and
third (off-peak season) quarters. All counts, unless otherwise
noted, reflect two-way traffic. It should be noted that since
1984, excluding permanent count stations and Florida Turnpike
counts, FDOT has been counting only once per calendar year. FDOT
uses a factoring program to arrive at annual daily averages.
As of 1991, there were 751 count stations located in the WPBUSA.
A total of ten traffic count stations are located either within or
in close proximity to the Village. The two count stations on U.S.
Highway 1 that are inventoried herein lie outside of the Village
limits. However, these are the closest count stations serving
North Palm Beach. One of these stations is located just south of
PGA Boulevard, and the other is located at the north end of the '
Town of Lake Park.
Three count stations are inventoried on SR AlA. One is located
within the Village approximately at the entrance to John D.
9-9
TABLE ~-1
' VILLASE OF NOR1H PAM BEACH IXISTINO ttAJOR ROAOIWY SYSFEtf INVENTORY
S1AiE (FOOT) (1) IYSINIENtNCE R16H1-
ROADHAY FWCTIONAL CLASS.
~ SEBHBfT DESCRIPTION RESP01(SIBILIiY OF~tAY
U.S.1 (SR 5)
U-PA
Lk.Pk. N,CIy Lnt to Parker Bridge ~
6-Lane Divided ~
FDQF
120 4t.
U-RN Parker Bridge H. io Village Licit 1-Lane Divided FDDT 120 it.
Northlake Blvd. U-PA SR 811 (U.S. A-1-A ALT.) E. to 6-Lane Divided FOOT 108 ft.
U.S. NaY. 1 (SR S).
Prosperity Fares Rd. CO-C Nortblake Blvd. to Lighthwse Dr. 5-Laae Undivided P.B.C. BO ft.
CO-C Lightbwu Dr. io Bnrns Road 3-lane Undivided P.B.C. 60 fi.
CD-C Burns Road to PSA Blvd. 5-Lane Undivided P.B.C. 80 ft.
SR A-1-A (2) CD-C U,S.1 (SR 5) io NacArlbur Stott Park 2-Lane Undivided P.B.C. BO ft.
' Lighthwse Drive Ci-C U.S. I to Prosperity Ferns Road 2-Lane Undivided N.P.B BO it.
CT-C Prsprly Frns Rd to Alt. A1A (SR 811) 2-Lane Undivided N.P.B 80 fi.
(1> According to State Highway Functiwal'Classification Systea:
U-PA - Urban Principal Aritrial
CO-C - County Collector
CT-C - City (Village) Collector
(2> Has bten designated by the State to bt turned wtr to tbt Cwniy bui h:s nol yet betn offically Transferred.
SOURCE: Florida Departnent of Transportation, Current Nighaay Functional Classification and Systens Urban and
Urbanised Areas (Jnnt 1488)
1
9-5
X ~
a
a 3
w n
m a n
_ .J ¢ ~
I a a o
v Fot-
w m I~ U_
CC O t~
~ z z LL
(7 LLO u'N
li I~Za
(7 •- U
a~
I~
x
> w
~ ~ °
3: p =
n.9 N
~y
3 ~~
N
N
~I ~
o~ N
~ -i
~ O
~
a
0
C ~ N
~ a u
~
r
'~ O
F
2 : " .-/
c~ '~' N -
-~
v w
. .
.T
c~
r.
0
0 O
$ ~ a
H
Z3 ~ ~ ~
/..w
Yrr~r
OGEpe,
~, ~ ,.•, '~~ i~
1 ~
~: ~~ ~~~E
r ~~
a
N e
a ~~
w`
~. • ~
~
, r' 9~CE
G[" " '
3l1 1 (11112'
.-/
I ~
N ~
pi m
v ik
Q
~ U
m + ~
C
Q N
~ E
a v
C
N
E
a
1
•~ ~ ~
I ,~
rl
i
N.., .i
I N'•
Oi .
O N # .
#..: O~
/ y
a~ _ - ~ ~
N ' ~ ~
6 ~ 'O
,d ~ q
v N
~ N a
a
a N
i°
~ a ~
N
~ ~
p:
~1~ ~
O o
UI I
`'~~ ~
~~
4-6
~ rr
9j
^
f .
wrouiaxn sxr• el Yr rnrr~
1
y
N
v
r.
N
E
a
U cal
w 1
aN
zrn
v
N
m
.'
N
a
1
u
MacArthur Beach State Park. The other two lie outside of the
t corporate limits; one is located 1,200 feet east of U.S. Highway 1
in the City of Riviera Beach, while the other is located 100 feet
east of the Blue Heron bridge on Singer island in the City of
Riviera Beach.
Two count stations are located on Northlake Boulevard, within the
Village; one is located 300 feet east of Prosperity Farms Road, and
the other is located 200 feet west of U.S. Highway 1.
Two traffic count stations are located on Prosperity Farms Road
within the Village; one is located 500 feet north of Northlake
Boulevard, and the other is located 300 feet north of Lighthouse
Drive. A third station is located on Prosperity Farms Road outside
of the Village, 1000 feet south of PGA Boulevard.
An historical record of traffic volumes from 1965 to 1991 is
provided in Table 4-2 for the count stations described above.
4.2.4 Other Modes of Transportation
The Village has no full-scale integrated bicycle path system in
place. However, there is a path that extends from Teal Way and
Prosperity Farms Road to the North Palm Beach Community Center and
a path located on the east side of U.S. Highway 1 from the
' Village's southern to northern corporate limits. These facilities
were constructed by Palm Beach County and North Palm Beach as part
of a joint effort.
The Palm Beach County Transportation Authority (CoTran) currently
operates bus routes throughout the North Palm Beach vicinity.
Various routes are available at specific time schedules to other
destinations of the county. Taxi services are also available to
Village residents.
The Palm Beach International Airport (PBIA) is the nearest major
airport facility to North Palm Beach. PBIA is approximately twelve
miles south of the Village. It is most easily accessed by Z-95.
4.3 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS
This section has been updated to respond to the Florida Department
of Community Affairs' (FDCA) review (May.'1989) of the TRAFFIC
CIRCULATION element of the Comprehensive ;Plan. The FDCA review
requires that the analysis of existing and future levels of service
(LOS) for both daily and peak-hour traffic volumes be revised to
reflect FDOT's 1987 "Generalized Daily and Peak Hour Level of
Service Maximum Volumes for Florida Urbanized Areas" tables.
Further, the FDOT, which is responsible for the review of Local
t Government Comprehensive Plans, has established a policy which
states that after 1990, FDOT will only recognize use of the
generalized tables in the 1985 HCM or any subsequent updates.
9-7
TABLE 4-2 '
TRAFFIC VOLUMES IMJENIORY <AADT'S)
STATION
ROADL44Y Hlt03ER 1465 1470 19J5 1980 1961 1982 1983 1484 1985 1986 1487 t9B8 1969 1990 1991
L~ ~ f-L L~ S3 ~6 ~ ~ ~ ~ G'a ~ C ~ ~L
U.S. Huy. 1 2800-2 7169 18193 22503 23260 21670 24d40 26620 23451 27432 - 28844 25843 2d317 24164 25586
(SR 5)
2812-2 4433 10526 16440 19910 15650 22261 21070 22461. 27762 25271 26179 23003 29076 2d738 243705
SR A-1-A ~-- 2601-2' - ~ 13237 13652 17860 19340 18230 15760 13667 14935 20441 •26199 23122 23407 25542 23356
2804-2 - 2387 - 7264 7794 7931 9146 9487 8825 10112 10932 10696 11268 6740 10848
2616-2 - - - 5062 SI56 5151 5531 5778 5733 7060 7879 7340 7554 47d1 7616
Norlhlake 2817-2 - - - 30018 24822 24949 315d5 31196 30481 32/dA 30819 30606 32458 31038 2871
Blvd.
2819-2 - - - - - - - 22714 22045 24748 21668 22788 22448 22408
Prosptrily 2604-1 - 4653 4788 WA SM6 9441 10830 11424 12515 13080 14432 14850 15441 15626 12661
Faros Road '
2806-2 - 1fOD5 11511 14866 13446 13688 13676 15090 14334 15936 14550 13864 14483 14311 16)10
2836-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10125
SOUR '
CE. West Paln Beach Urban Study Area (UPBUSA) Traffic Coont Prograa,
Historic Tra((ic Volunts, (1940).
9-8
The most significant difference between the 1985 HCM and previous
t versions is that the new measure of effectiveness for arterials is
based on average travel speed, not capacity. The 1985 HCM utilizes
a combination of traffic .operation improvements (e.g. signals per
mile, effective green time, cycle length, quality of signal
progression and presence of left turn bays) and physical
improvements (e.g, number of lanes, grades, etc.) to yield roadway
flow quality. The 1985 HCM recognizes that the single most
important factor in determining arterial level of service is
signalized intersection spacing or the number of signalized
intersections per mile., The previous versions considered all
roadways as uninterrupted flow facilities and used volume to
capacity ratios (V/C) as the acceptable measure of effectiveness
for all roadways. Generally, uninterrupted flow facilities are not
affected by signalized intersections.
In 1988, FDOT adopted generalized daily and peak hour LOS tables
for use in both uninterrupted flow facilities (e.g. freeways) and
interrupted flow facilities (e.g. arterials). These FDOT
generalized tables are based upon actual Florida traffic data
making them applicable throughout Florida.
This section is intended to: (1) identify the approach used in
selecting appropriate LOS groups from FDOT's Generalized Daily and
Peak Hour Level of Services Maximum Volume table as it relates to
' the Village's existing roadway system; (2) analyze the existing
traffic circulation levels and system need's based upon the selected
generalized planning table groups; (3) analyze the projected
traffic circulation levels and system needs for both a five-year
and ten-year period based upon the selected generalized planning
table groups; and (4) identify roadway issues and opportunities
related to the Village.
4.3,_1 Generalized Daily and Peak Hour Level of Service Maximum
Volumes Table Selection
As stated earlier, the single most important change in capacity
analysis in the 1985 HCM is the role of signalized intersection
spacing. As a result of the added importance of signalized
intersections, FDOT created various "group" designations to account
for the number of signalized intersections per mile. In the
development of these generalized daily and peak-hour tables, FDOT
utilized seven groups (A-G) ranging from a few signals per mile to
many per mile.
A two-step procedure was followed to select the most applicable LOS
group for the Village's roadway system. The first step involved
performing signalized intersection analysis for each of the
functionally classified roads within the Village. The second step
' was to perform a field verification of the operational flow of each
roadway by determining average segment travel speed using the "Test
Car Method" from the 1985 HCM. The TEST-CAR results were then
9-9
compared with the signalized intersection analysis (from step one) '
to select the representative group applicable to each existing
roadway.
4.3.1.1 Signalized Intersection Analysis
A signalized intersection analysis was performed on the Village's
functionally classified roads by dividing the length of each
roadway segment within the Village by the number of signals thereon
to determine the number of signals per mile. Table 4-3 summarizes
the results and identifies the group letter that would represent
each of the roadways:
TABLE 4-3
Signalization Analysis Summary
Signals
Roadway
Description
Miles Sig-
pals per
ile Group
etter
O.S. Hwy. 1 LkPk N. City Limit to PGA Blvd 2.94 7 2.38 C
SR AlA MacArthur State Pk to U.S. Hwy 1 3.00 1 0.33 A
N. Lake Blvd. Prosperity Frms Rd to U.S. Hwy 1 1.14 2 1.75 C
Pros Frm Rd. N.Lake Blvd. to PGA Blvd 2'.60 3 1.15 B
Lghthouse Dr. U.S. Hwy 1 to Alt AlA (SR 811) 1.66 2 1.20
*Two-way collector
According to Table 4-3, the five major roadways within the Village '
are represented by four different groups. County Road AlA is
represented by the most favorable Group A with less than 0.75
signalized intersections per mile. Prosperity Farms Road is
represented by Group B indicating between 0.76 to 1.5 signalized
intersections per mile. 'Two roadways, U.S. Highway 1 and North lake
Boulvard, are represented by Group C with between 1.6 to 2.5
signalized intersections per mile. Finally, Lighthouse Drive,
which is classified as a village collector, is represented by a
separate group identified as the Two-Way Collector Group.
Tables 4-4A and 4-4B identify the FDOT generalized daily and peak
hour LOS maximum volumes by group and applicable roadway selected
by the Village for future planning and projected development
reviews.
Since FDOT generalized tables do not include maximum volume levels
for either three-lane or :five-lane roadways, both of which occur in
the Village, two assumptions were made to identify maximum volume
levels. Regarding three-lane facilities, it is assumed that a
twenty-five percent volume increase over a two-lane facility is
realized by having a left turn lane, thus maintaining two free-flow
lanes. The second assumption is that a five-lane, undivided
facility is equal to a four-lane, divided facility.
9-10
TABLE 4-4A
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH
GENERALIZED DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE MAXIMUM VOLUMES
Lanes/ I
Type I A
2/Undiv.-- - -_13700
3/Undiv.* 17125
4/Undiv. ~ 28310
S/Undiv.+~~ 29800
4/Div. 29800
6/Div. 45400
Group A - 0.0 to 0.75 Signalized Intersections per Mile
Roadway: County Road AIA (CR AIA)
Level of Service 1
B C D E t
15000 15600 16500 17400
18750 19500 20625 21750
30305 31350 33155 34865
31900 33000 34900 36700
31900 33000 34900 36700
48100 49700 52400 55200
Group B - 0.76 to 1.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile
Roadway: Prosperity Farms Road (7 current signalization)
Lanes/ 1 Level of Service
TYPe 1
_________ - A
----__ ~ B. ~
-s=~ C D E
2/Undiv.
9000 == °___°___° _°--
13700 14500 -_ -- _~
15300 __=_-_
16100
3/Undiv.+: 1!250 17125 18125 19125 20125
4/Undiv. 19000 28215 29450 30875 32300
5/Undiv.** 20000 29700 31000 32500 34000
4/Div. 20000 29700 31000 32500 34000
6/Div. 30600 45100 46700 48900 51200
Group C - 1.6 to 2.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile
' Roadway: (1) U.S. Highway 1 CSR 5)
<2> Northlake Boulevard (SR 850)
(3) Prosperity Farms Road (w/additional Slgnal>
Lanes/ I Level of Service
Type I A~~• 8 C D E
3/Undiv.- - 12750 16875 18500 19625
4/Undiv. - 21660 28025 30115 31730
S/Undiv.+~+~ - 22800 29500 31700 33400
4/Div. - 22800 29500 31700 33400
6/Div. - 35100 45000 47900 50300
Village Collector
Roadway: Lighthouse Drive
Lanes/ I - Level of Service
Type I A**~ B+~~aE C D E
2/Undiv. - - 7700 11600 12900
3/Undiv.* - - 9625 14500 16125
4/Undiv. - - 16200 24300 26400
~ Assume three lane capacity at 125 percent of a two-lane
capacity facility.
+~+~ Assumed 5 lane undivided facility equal to a 4 lane divided
facility.
~'+'~! If ", it Is assumed that the LOS indicated cannot'be achieved.
Source: Flor~cla Hp ghway System Plan Level of Service Standards
and Guidelines Manual, F1. Dept. of Transportation, 1988
9-11
TABLE 4-46
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE MAXIMUM VOLUMES
Group A - 0.0 to 0.75 Signalized Intersections per Mile '
Roadway: County Road AIA (CR A1A)
Lanes/ 1 Level of Service 1
Type I A B C O E I "
2/Undiv. 1310 1440 1490 1580 1670
3/Undiv.~t 1638 1600 1862 1975 2088
4/Undiv. 2717 2916 3012 3182 3354
5/Undiv.** 2860 3070 3170 3350 3530
4/Div. 2860 3070 3170 3350 3530
6/DIv. 4350 4620 4770 5030 5300
Group B - 0.76 to I.S Signalized Intersections per Mile
Roadway: Prosp erity .Farms Road (8 current signal ization)
Lanes/ I Level of Service 1
Type I A B C D E I
2/Undiv. 870 1310 1390 1470 1540
3/Undiv.x 1068 1636 1738 1838 1925
4/Undiv. 1824 -2708 2822 2964 3106
5/Undiv.^ 1920 2850 2970 3120 3270
4/Div. 1920 2850 2970 3120 3270
6/Div. 2930 4330 4480 4700 4910
Group C - 1.6
to 2.5
Signalized I
ntersections per Mile '
Roadway: (1> U.S. Highway 1 (SR 5)
<2) Northlake Boulevard CSR B50)
(3) Prosperity F arms Rd. (w/additional signal)
Lanes/ I Level of Service 1
Type I A~*~
--------
- B C D E
-
---------
3/Undiv.+t - --------- --
1225 ------- --
1613 ------- --
1775 -------
1888
4/Undiv. - 2080 2688 2888 3050
5/Undiv.r* - 2190 2830 3040 3210
4/Div. - 2190 2630 3040 3210
6/Div. - 3370 4320 4600 4830
Village Collector
Roadway: Lighthouse Drive
Lanes/ 1 Level of Service I
Type I A**~ B*+~+~ C D E I
2/Undiv. - - 730 1110 1240
.3/Undiv.r - - 912 1388 1550
4/Undiv.. - - 2390 3570 3850
~ Assume three lane capacity at 125 percent of a two-lane
capacity facility.
a* Assumed 5 lane undivided facility equal to a 4 lane divided
facility.
^+~~ If "-', It is~assumed that the LOS indicated cannot be achieved.
Source: Florida Highway System Plan Level of Service Standards
and Guidelines Manual, Fl. Dept. of Transportation, 1988
4-17.
' 4.3.2 Levels of Service
LOS analyses are a good means of summarizing facility conditions.
The LOS of a roadway is defined as the ability of a maximum number
of vehicles to pass over a given section of roadway or through an
intersection during a specified time period, while maintaining a
given operating condition. A LOS definition generally describes
operational conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel
time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and
convenience, and safety.
While the current definition of LOS is virtually the same as that
used in the previous HCM, procedures used, to determine LOS have
been altered considerably. The previous HCM used uninterrupted
flow characteristics and capacity based solely on roadway
geometries and traffic conditions. The 1985 HCM 8addresses
interrupted flow characteristics based on travel time, making
capacity far more variable.
The familiar structure of six LOS standards remains the same in the
1985 HCM. Various LOS are given letter designations from "A" to
"F", with level of service "A" representing the best operating
conditions and level "F" the worst. In general, the various LOS
are defined as follows:
' 1. Level of Service A represents free flow. Individual users are
virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic
stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within
the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort
and convenience provided to the motorist, passenger or pedestrian
is excellent.
2. Level of Service B is in the range of stable flow, but the
presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be
noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively
unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to
maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS A. The level of
comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than at LOS A,
because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to
affect individual behavior.
3. Level of Service C is in the range of stable flow, but marks
the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of
individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions
with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now
affected by the presence of others, .and maneuvering with the
traffic stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the
user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines
notably at this level.
9-13
4. Level of Service D represents high-density, but stable flow.
Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the '
driver or pedestrian experiences a generally poor level of comfort
and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally
cause operational problems at this level.
5. Level of Service E represents operating conditions at or near
the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low but relatively
uniform value. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is
extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a
vehicle or pedestrian to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers.
Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor and driver or
pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this level
are usually' unstable because small increases in flow or minor
perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns.
6. Level of Service F is used to define forced or breakdown flow.
This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching
appoint exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues
form behind such locations. Operations within the queue are
characterized by stop-and-go waves and they are extremely unstable.
Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet
or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Level of
Service F is used to describe the operating conditions within the
queue, as well as the point of the breakdown. It should be noted,
however, that in many cases operating conditions of vehicles or '
pedestrians discharged from the queue may be quite good.
Nevertheless, it is the point at which arrival flow exceeds
discharge flow which causes the queue to form, and Level of Service
F is an appropriate designation for such points.
It should be noted that these definitions are general and
conceptual in nature. However, as a result of these definitions
being applied to both uninterrupted flow facilities as well as
interrupted flow facilities, some of the specific designations have
different meanings than in the past, and care needs to be taken in
interpreting the results. LOS for interrupted flow facilities vary
widely in terms of both the perception of service quality and the
operational variables used to describe them. The reader should
reference the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual often; although the LOS
concept has been retained, new parameters have been introduced to
better quantify service to facility users.
4.3.3 Existina Facility Analysis
According to 9J-5.005.4 Florida Administrative Code, the
requirement is established under 9J-5.005.4 that at least two
planning periods be considered. The first being at least the first
five-year period subsequent to the plan's adoption and the second
for an overall ten-year period. '
7'he existing capacity analysis is for the year 1991 which is the
base year for evaluating the 1994, five-year planning period, and
the 1999, ten-year planning period. The, methodology used in
4-14
' deriving the projected traffic volume is described in further
detail in Section 4.3.6.
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Counts for 1991 are used herein
for all roadway segments except for Prosperity Farms Road. It is
concluded that construction activity on this roadway segment in
1991 resulted in abnormally low AADT counts. Table 4-5 illustrates
1990 roadway conditions prior to ongoing improvements to Prosperity
Farms Road, along with a comparison of the AADT volumes recorded
for 1990 and 1991 which .clearly indicate the effect construction
activity had on this roadway segment. According to the Palm Beach
County Engineering Department's Construction Coordination Division,
improvements to Prosperity Farms Road were divided into two
segments: (i) 10th Avenue in Lake Park to Burns Road; and (2) Burns
Road to PGA Boulevard. Construction improvements began on both
segments in October 1990 with the segment between Burns Road and
PGA Boulevard completed in June 1991. The segment between 10th
Avenue and Burns Road is currently undergoing completion.
Therefore, for purposes of this analysis, the 1990 AADT volumes for
Prosperity Farms Road in Table 4-5 will be used as the 1991 traffic
counts. Further, it should be noted that no AADT count data exists
on the Prosperity Farms Road segment between Lighthouse Drive and
Burns Road prior to 1991. As a result, a 1990 AADT volume for this
segment had to be estimated. The method used assumed that the
ratio of 1991 AADT counts north and south of Lighthouse Drive on
' Prosperity Farms Road did not change from that which existed in
1990. By applying the 1991 ratio to the available 1990 AADT count
south of Lighthouse Drive, an estimated 1990 AADT count was derived
for the segment north of Lighthouse Drive. This resulted in a 1990
AADT count estimate on Prosperity Farms Road between Lighthouse
Drive and Burns Road of 13,596 vehicles per day, as shown in Table
4-5.
Further, a peak-hour capacity analysis on the existing roadway
system was performed. The peak-hour volumes were calculated,
wherever possible, from the MPO~s traffic count data using the peak
AADT volume count (i.e., 1st Quarter volumes), then applied the
nine percent peaking characteristic generally accepted for use in
Palm Beach County.
The results of the existing capacity analysis by roadway segment
are shown in Tables 4-6A and 4-6B.
4.3.4 Ooerational Flow Usina TEST-CAR Method
In an effort to determine if the selected groups for the village
roadways are representative of their current operating conditions,
the TEST-CAR Method, which is described in the 1985 HCM, Chapter
11, was used. The procedure used in performing the TEST-CAR Method
' is summarized as follows:
1. Each roadway is divided into segments defined by the
distance between signalized intersections;
9-15
TABLE 4-5 '
PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD TRAFFIC VOI.LME COMPARISON (1990 - 1991)
1990 1991
STATION RCAOWAY 5'E9~fF CLASS(t) LANES TYPES AADT AADT
2804-2
Prosperity Fns Rd
S of P(YI Blvd to RCA B1vdMonet ~
CD-C ~
2
Undivided Q
15626
12662
(2) Prosperity Fms Rd S of RCA B1vdMa~et to Burns Rd. CD-C 2 Undivided 15626 12662
2836-2(3>Prosperity Fags Rd N of Lighthouse Dr. to Burns Rd. CD-C 2 Undivided 13596 10125
2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of-NL Blvd. to Eagle Way CO-C 2 Undivided 14312 10710
(4> Prosperity fms Rd N of Eagle Way to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 2 Undivided 19312 10710
(ll U-PA - lh•ban Principal Arterial
CO-C - County Collector
CT-C - City Collector '
(2) Used sane AADT volume as station 2804-2 for ihis roadway segoenl.
(3) AADT volume estimated for this roadway segaeat by using the percentage difference between 2896-2
and 2836-2 in 1991, then applying this percentage to the 1999 2806-2 station volume.
(4> Used same AADT volume as station 2806-2 for this roadway segment.
1
4-16 I
' 2. Using two stopwatches, travel time between centers of
signalized intersections is recorded along with the
location, cause and duration of each stop on the field
worksheet;
3. Six TEST-CAR runs are made over three different weekdays
during three basic time periods (i.e. 8:00-10:OOAM,:Noon-
2:OOPM and 4:00-6:OOPM), in ' order to obtain a
representative; average travel speed for each roadway
under varying conditions;
4. The TEST-CAR runs are performed at different times in the
signal cycle to reduce the chance of having all runs
beginning "first in platoon";
5. From the data, the average travel speed was calculated
for each time period, utilizing travel times, segment
lengths and average travel speed over the entire roadway
section; and
6. A LOS for each roadway segment is determined, as well as
for the entire roadway section using Table 11-1, Arterial
Levels of Service, from Chapter 11 of the 1985 HCM.
The results are summarized for each of the roadway segments in
' Table 4-7. The actual TEST-CAR run results are provided as
Attachment 4-1 at the end of this element.
A comparison of the TEST-CAR LOS (Table 4-7) with the traffic
volume-based LOS (Tables 4-6A and 4-6B) indicate that the FDOT
Generalized Groups selected to evaluate Village roadways are
appropriate. Further, their use in evaluating future projected
traffic needs of the Village is justified.
it should be noted that Prosperity. Farms Road is the only roadway
in the Village that showed a. lower TEST-CAR LOS than volume-based
LOS. The primary reason for this is the fact that the segment
between Northlake Blvd.. and Lighthouse Drive was still under a
restricted speed limit of 35 mph due to current construction
activity. Assuming that the speed limit was the normal 40 mph at
time of testing, the travel time over this segment would only have
to decrease by 9.3 seconds to change the LOS from "B" to "A" which
very likely will happen. Assuming this to be the case, then the
results in Table 4-7 are consistent with Tables 4-6A and 4-6B.
4.3.5 Analvsis of Existing Deficiencies
FDOT identifies statewide minimum acceptable operating LOS
' standards at LOS D for arterials and LOS E for minor arterials and
other roadways for existing urbanized .areas. However, since all
roadways within the Village are considered to functionally operate
as Group A, B or C arterials, it is recommended that daily and
peak-hour LOS D be adopted for all arterial and collector roadways
4-17
TRBLE 4-6A
N.P.B. DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR EX15fIN8 H16HUAY SYSTEM - 1991 TRAFFIC VOLUTES '
FDOT
CLASS NUOIER FDQT 1991 LQS (2) SEOMFtfT
STATION ROADIIAY SESMENT (1) LNS TYPE SIU4M.S GROUP MDT 7 LOS D LOS
~__
2880-2 U.S.I (SR 5) Lk.Pk. N.Cty lAt to Lighthouse Dr U-M 6 Divided 3 C 25586 47900 B
(3> U.S J (SR 5) Lighthouse Or. to Pukrr Bridge U-PA 6 Divided 2 C 25586 4790A B
2812-2(4)U.S. I tSR 5) Parker Bridge to Pt)A Blud. U PA 4 Divided 2 C 27902 31700 C
2816-2 A1A U.S.1 to McArthur State Park CO-C 2 Undiv. 1 A 7816 16500 A
2817-2 NorlAlake Blud. Prosperity Fms. Rd. to Soutlwind U-PA d Divided 1 C 28Ji8 47900 B
2419-2 Northlakt Blud. Southulnd Rd. to U.S. 1 (SR 5) U-PA d Divided 1 C ?3398 47400 B
2804-2(5)ProsperitY Fis Rd S of POA Bivd to RCA B1vdRlonet CO-C 5 Undiv. 0 8 1562d 3250D A
(5) Prosperity Frs Rd S of RCA B1udMonti to Burns Rd. CO-C S Uodiv. 1 B 1561d 32500 A
2836-2(6)Prosperity Faro Rd Burns Rd. to L'IghiAaust Dr: CO-C 3 Undiv. 1 B 13596 19125 A
(5) Prosperity fns Rd Lighthouu Dr. to Eagle !lay CO-C 3 Undiv. 0 B 14312 19125 A
2806-2(5)ProsperitY Fns Rd Eagle Uay to Northlake Blud. CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 B 143!2 32500 A
4102()) Lighthouu Drive U.S. 1 to Prosperity Fares Rwd CT-C 2 Uadiu. 1 VC 10197 11600 D
tT)) Lighthouse Drive Prosperity Faros Rd. io Alt. AtA CT-C 2 Undiv. i VC 5608 11600 C ,
(1) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial
CO-C - County Collector
CT-C - city Collector
(2) Niainur AADT uolwt frm T:blt 4-4A not to bt exctr&d to bt w)tAin the Viilagt Standard of lOS D.
(3) Used sane MDT volune as station 2800-2.
(4) Dtrivtd an annual average daily volurt given an AAD7 peak volurt of 243)0 by applying a .95 factor obtained fray the
1990 peak and off-peak uolures for the sane count station.
<5) Uud 1490 MDT volunes fear Table 4-2 as representative o1 1991 volunes.
(6) MDT volune estirated far tAis rwdway segnent by using the percentage difference between 2806-2 and 283d-2 in 1991
and applying this percentage to the 1990 2806-2 count station volune.
(7) Tmporary count station established by County for a one tine cant taken in March 1990 (1st Arter. count). Derived
an average daily uolurr for 1998 by applying a 0.98 factor to the peak MDT count of 10405. Then obtained ihr 1991
volune by assuring the 1990 volure was the sane as the 1991 uolure due to the construction activity at the
intersection of Prosperity Faros Road and Lighthouu Drive.
(8) MDT volune estirated by using February 27, 1990 intersection count at Lighthouse Drive and Prosperity Fares Rd. t~
deternine lAe percentage d)f{trrnce of traffic west-booed to east-bound of 55 percent. Then applied (his percenla
to the east-boned tnporary 9102 count station to estivate the west-bound AADT count and assured this want to be t
sane in 1491 due to the construction activity al the intersection of Prosperity Fares Road and Lighthouse Orive.
4-18
TABLE 4-66
' N.P.B. PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS FOR IXISTING ROAOli4Y SYSTEM - 1991 TRAFFIC VOLIIiES
1441 FDOT
CLASS NUMBER FOOT PK.NR LOS (3> SEB(BfT
STATION ROAOUAY SE6MBfT (!)
~ LNS TYPE SIBi41.S BROUP (2) 7 LOS D LOS
2800-2
U.S.I (SR 5)
Lk.Pk. N.Cty tit io Lighthouse Dr ~
U-M ~
d
Divided ~~
3
C
2135
4680
8
(4) U.S.1 (SR S) Lighthouu Dr. io Parker Bridgt U-PA 6 Divided 2 C 2435 4600 B
2812-2 U.S. 1 (SR 5> Parker Bridge to PSA Blvd. U PA 4 Divided 2 C 2643 3040 C
2816-2 A1A U.S.1 to MtRrtbur Stale Park CO-C 2 Undiv. 1 A 861 1580 A
2817-2 Norlhlake Blvd. Prosperity Fns. Rd. to Soutbwind U-PA d Divided 1 C 2634 4600 B
2919-2 Northlake Blvd. Souibaind Rd. to U.S. I (SR 5) U-PA 6 Divided 1 C 2156 4600 B
2804-2 Prosperity Fps Rd S of PSA Blvd to RCA Blvd/Honet CO-C 5 Undiv. 0 B/C(5 1511 3120-8 A
(5) Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA B1vdMonet io Burns Rd. CO-C S Undiv. 1 B/C(5 1511 3120-8 A
2836-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Burns Rd. to Lighthwse Dr. CO-C 3 Undiv. 1 B!C(S 1224 1838-8 B
' (6)
2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd
Prosperity hs Rd Lighthouse Dr. to Eagle Uay
Eagle Way to Nortblake Blvd. CO-C
CO-C 3
5 Undiv.
Undiv. 0
i B/C(5
fl/C(5 1335
1335 1838-B
3120-8 A
B
9102 Lighthonu Drive U.S. 1 to Prosperity Fans Rwd CT-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC 917 1110 6
Lighthoau Drive Prosperity Fares Rd. to Alt. AtA Ci-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC 505 1110 A
(I) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial
CO-C - Covniy Collector
CT-C - Cily Collector
(2) Usrd MPO's peak season average daily volunes and applitd a Y/. peaking Actor generally accepted by Pal^ Beuh County.
(3) Mininun Peak Hour voluoe fra Table 4-4B not to be exceeded to be within the Village Standard of LOS D.
(4) Used sme Peak Hour voluoe as 2800-2.
(5) Used sane Peak Hour volune as 2804-2.
(6) Used sale Peak Hour volune as 2606-2
1
9-19
TABLE 4-7 '
VILLASE OF NORTH PAL11 BFACFI ,
SttfVaRY OF ARTERIAL LOS BY ROADUAY
US1N8
TEST-CAR METHOD
I I I I 1 IlDuera11111Average I I/werage II I
I I I I (FREE IlRuaningillTiaK forlLength oflArterlalli 1
1 I ILENSTHIARTERIALIFLOU IlTiee III 6 Runs IRwdaay ISperd IlFacil ityl
1 ROAOIfAY
I I 5ECT10N 1(ai.> ICI
IC ASS I(mph>11(uc> I11(sec) a i
- (ml.) I(mph) b IILOS c 1
IU.S. FbN 1 I
1 I I
2.931 ~
1 1~1 I
135-4011 111=
1846.5111 ~I
307.81 1
2.931 11
34.311 8 I
I
I ILkshore-N.L.Blud.l .241 1 135 II 183.7111 30.61 .241 20.211 BI
1 IN.Lk,Anchorage 1 .231 i 135 11 182.2111 30.41 .231 27.311 CI
I (Anchorage-Lthu I .471 1 135 II 325.3111 51.21 .471 31.211 BI
I ILthse-Anchorage I .281 I 135 II 206.2111 34.41 .281 29.311 BI
I (Anchorage-Yacht I .331 1 135 II 194.6111 32.51 .331 36.611 AI
I (Yacht-Golfviea Rdl .621 I 140 II 346.0111 57.71 .621 38.711 AI
I
1 16olfvlew-P6A Blvdl
I I .761
I I 140 II
I II 408.3111
III 68.01
I .761
I 40.211
II AI
I
INorihlake Blvd. I I 1.141 I 1 3511 690.7111 115.11 1.141 35.711 A I
I IPrsprty-Southwindl .531 I 135 11 339.5111 56.61 .531 33.711 BI
I
I ISouthwind-U.S.1 t
I 1 .611 1 135 II
1 II 351.2111
III SB.51
I .611
I 37.511
II AI
I
ICty. Rd. AIA
1 I
I
3.001
1
135-4511
1634.9111
272.51
3.0(11
39.611 A '
I
I IPBA-Lost Tree I .751 I 135 II 525.4111 87.61 .751 30.811 BI
I
I (Lost Tree-St.Pk. I 2.251
I 1 145 II
I II 1109.5111
III 184.91
I 2.251
I 43.611
II AI
I
If~rosperity Frms 1 -I
.l 1 2.521. 1 130-4011 1592.9111 265.51 2.521 34.211 B I
I (PGA - Burns Rd. 1 .881 I 140 II 483.1111 80.51 .881 39.311 AI
I (Burns-Lthu Dr. I .991 1 13D 11 652.8111 IOB.81 .991 32.811 BI
I ILthse - N.Lk Blvdi .651 I 140 II
l 457.0111
III 76.21
I .651
I 30.711
II BI
I
I
(Lighthouse Dr. 1 I
1 I I
1.661 III I
l
1 2511 1571.5111 261.91 1.661 22.611 B I
I IU.S.1-Prosperity I 1.001 111 125 II 852.9111 142.21 1.001 25.311 AI
I IPrspty-AIt.AlA I .661 III 125 II 7!8.6111 1!9.81 .661 19.811 BI
a. Average travel tine in both directions over 6 runs for each roadway.
b. Calculated by (3600)<Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time).
c. LOS taken from 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 11-1.
Source: 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
i.
9-20
within its jurisdiction. Accordingly (Ref: Tables 4-6A and 4-6B)
' all roadway segments within the Village are currently operating at
acceptable daily and peak-hour LOS. Based on this analysis, there
are no existing system needs for which the Village must plan
immediate roadway improvements.
4.3.6 Accident Data Analysis
Both Palm Beach County :and the North Palm Beach Public Safety
Department maintain traffic accident data. As a result of Palm
Beach County establishing an accident records data base in the
early 1970s, most public safety agencies (i.e., Florida Highway
Patrol, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Department and Municipal Police
and Public' Safety Departments) voluntarily submit all accident
records to the Traffic Records Section within the Palm Beach County
Engineering Department. Since the Village of North Palm Beach
participates in this program, North Palm Beach accident data was
obtained from the County for the seven-month period from January 1,
1991 through July 31, 1991, for purposes of this analysis.
Table 4-8 summarizes the accidents which occurred in the Village
over this period and indicates that most of the accidents (i.e.
66.1$) occur on U.S. Highway 1 and/or its intersections. From
Table 4-8, the following road segments and intersections are
identified as frequent accident areas within the Village:
' 1. U.S. Highway 1 (SR5) and Golf view Road/Lakeshore
Drive intersection;
2. U.S. Highway 1 and Lighthouse Drive intersection;
3. Northlake Boulevard (SR 850) and Prosperity Farms
Road intersection; and
4. Prosperity Farms Road and Lighthouse Drive intersection.
A comparison of Table 4-8 with previous data (i.e., Table 4-5 of
the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation)
indicates that U.S. Highway 1 remaitts the predominant roadway for
accident frequency within the Village, with Northlake Boulevard and
Prosperity Farms Road showing a slight increase over this period.
The increase is presumed to be the result of construction activity
along Prosperity Farms Road during 1991. A comparison between the
1987 and 1991 accident data is shown in Table 4-9.
1
9-21
TABLE 4-S
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH ACCIDENT SUMMARY
ACCIDENTS W/I VILLAGE (1/1/91-7/31/91)
Total Accidents 165 '
Accidents By Roadway N
U.S. Highway 1 (SR 5) 11 % 109 66.1
U.S.1/NorthlaKe Blvd. 4 3.6
U.S.1/Anchorage - South 1 1.0
U.S.1/Ebbtide 1 1.0
U.S.1/Lighthouse Dr. 5 4.6
U.S.1/Anchorage -'.North 4 3.6
U.S.1/Yacht Club Dr. 3 2.7
U.S.1/ParKer Bridge 3 2.7
U.S.1/8olfview-Lk Shore Dr. 9 8.2
U.S.1/Carolina Rd. 1 1.0
Other (No Trend Established)* 78 71.6
t•lorthlake Blvd. (SR 850> 35 18.8
NorthlaKe/U.S. 1 4 11.4 common w/ U.S.1
Northlake/Southwind 1 2.9
Northlake/North Lake Dr. 1 2.9
Northlake/Prosperity Farms Rd. I1 31.4
Other (No Trend Established)* 18 51.4
SR A1A/CR AIA 7 4.2
SR AlA/Burnt Bridge 1 14.3
Other (No Trend'Established>~r 6 85.7 '
Prosperity Farms Road ~ 25 6.5
Prsprt>•/torthlake Blvd. 11 44.0 comm w/Northlake
Frsprt>•/Lighthouse Dr. 3 12.0
Frsprty/Buttonwood Rd. 1 4.0
Prsprty/Allamanda Ln. 2 8.0
Frsprty/RCA Blvd. 1 4.0
Prsprty/Humingbird Way 1 4.0
Other (No Trend Established)* 6 24.0
Lighthouse Drive ~ 12 2.4
Lighthouse/U.S. 1 5 4.1.7 common w/U.S.1
Lighthouse/Anchorage 1 8.3
Lighthouse/Prsprty Frms. Rd. 3 25.0 common w/Prsprty
Lighthouse/Laurel 1 8.3
Other Wo Trend Established>* 2 16.7
T Oi"AL ACCIDENT SUh1MARY
U.S.1 109
torthlake Blvd.. 35 •
SR AfA 7
Prosperity Farms Rd. 25
Lighthouse Dr. 12
Total 186
Less common accidents --23 '
165
* Accidents occurred off-roadway or not at intersections.
TABLE 4-8
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH ACCIDENT SUMMARY
ACCIDENTS W/I VILLAGE (1/1/91-7/31/92)
' Total Accidents 165
Accidents By Roadway ry %
U.S. Highway 1 <SR 5) N % 109 60.2
U.S.1/NorthlaKe Blvd. 4 3.6
U.S.1/Anchorage - South 1 1.0
U.S.1/Ebbtide 1 1.0
U.S.1/Lighthouse Dr. 5 4.6
U.S.I/Anchorage - North ~ 4 3.6
U.S.i/Yacht Club Dr. 3 2,7
U.S.1/Parker Bridge 3 2.7
U.S.I/Golfview-LK Shore Dr. 9 8.2
U.S.1/Carolina Rd. 1 1.0
Other (No Trend Established>~ 78 71.6
Northlake Bivd. <SR 850) 35 17.1
Northlake/U.S. 1 4 11.4 common w/ U.S.1
Northlake/Southwind 1 2.9
Northlake/North Lake Dr. 1 2.9
Northlake/Prosperity Farms Rd. 11 31.4
Other (No Trend Established>* 18 51.4
SR A1A/CR AIA 7 3.9
SR AlA/Burnt Bridge 1 14.3
Other (No Trend Established)* 6 85.7
' Prosperity Farms Road 25 13.8
Prsprty/Northlake Blvd. 11 44.0 comet w/Northlake
Prsprty/Lighthouse br. 3 12.0
Prsprty/Buttonwood Rd. 1 4.0
Prsprty/Allamanda Ln. 2 B.0
Prsprty/RCA Blvd. 1 4.0
Prsprty/Humingbird Way 1 q.0
Other <No Trend Established) 6 24.0
Lighthouse Drive 11 5.0
Lighthouse/U.S. 1 5 45.5 common w/U.S.1
Lighthouse/Anchorage 1 9.1
Lighthouse/Prsprty Frets. Rd. 2 18.2 common w/Prsprty
Lighthouse/Laurel 1 9.1
Other CNo Trend Established>* 2 18.2
TOTAL ACCIDENT SUMMARY
U.S.1 109
Northlake Blvd. 35
SR AfA 7
Prosperity Farms Rd. 25
Lighthouse Dr. it
Total 187
Less common accidents 22
f65
~ Accidents occlrrred off-roadway or not at intersections.
4-22
TABLE 4-9
Village of North Palm Beach Accident Comparison
1987 and 1991 '
1987 1991*
Total Accidents 192 165
~ of ~ of
Accidents by Roadway Total Total
U.S. 1 (SR 5) 63.5 66.1
Northlake Blvd (SR 850) 14.1 18.8
SR AlA 9.4 4.2
Prosperity Farms Rd. 6.8 8.5
Lighthouse Dr. 6.2 2.4
* 14.1$ improvement since 1987.
Analysis of the 1991 data indicates that a substantial number of
accidents (78) reported along U.S. Highway 1 continue to occur off
of the roadway in off-street parking lots and other areas where no
trend can be established. It is noted that the most frequent
accident location along U.S. Highway 1 was at the intersection with
Golfview Road/Lakeshore Drive, just North of Parker Bridge.
Preliminary engineering work for the widening of U.S. Highway 1 in
this area has been rescheduled from FY 1988-89 to 1993-94.
The next most frequent accident location was the Northlake '
Boulevard/Prosperity Farms Road intersection. Northlake Boulevard
and U.S. Highway 1 are the two highest traffic-volume roadways in
North Palm Beach. Of the thirty-five traffic accidents recorded
along Northlake Boulevard, four were common with tho$e recorded on
U.S. Highway. 1 being :located at their intersection. This
represents nearly a forty-three percent reduction over the same
period in 1987. However, the frequency of accidents at the
Northlake Boulevard/Prosperity Farms Road intersection increased by
83 percent over the same period in 1987. Construction improvements
to this intersection began in October 1990, with completion in
March 1992. Another intersection affected by the completed
improvements to Prosperity Farms Road is the intersection of
Prosperity Farms Road with Lighthouse Drive, which showed a 200
percent increase over the same period in 1987. The completion of
improvements to Prosperity Farms Road and its intersection with
Northlake Boulevard should significantly reduce the frequency of
accidents.
SR AlA showed a significant 61.1 percent improvement over 1987
accident data, primarily due to the recent completion of
improvements (i.e., late 1990) to Burnt Bridge.
Additional improvements necessary to alleviate accident hazards '
entail traffic signaliz,ation, improved roadway maintenance and
additional signage. Each are relatively small scale. These types
of improvements are best accommodated im the Village's annual
9-23
budget rather than this plan, since they generally involve a range
of project costs below the scope of this TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
element and the CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS element.
4.3.7 Anal sis o€ Projected Needs
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida
Administrative Code, projections of the future traffic circulation
LOS and system needs are prepared based upon the future land use
series maps, included in the .FUTURE LAND USE element.
The Village is located within an urbanized area and is, therefore,
within the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) jurisdiction. As part of the Florida Department of Community
Affairs requirement to revise the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION element, the
Department further specified that future projections be based on
the 2010 Interim Transportation System Plan adopted by the MPO in
1988.
As established in the GENERAL REQUIREMENTS element, both a five-
year (1994) and a ten-year (1999) planning period will be analyzed.
In order to derive traffic-volume projections, compound annual
growth rates were derived based upon traffic volumes between 1991,
the base year (ref: Table 4-6A) and the projected volumes in the
year 2010. Table 4-10 presents the derivation of the compound
' annual growth rates to be used in projecting traffic volumes on
Village roadways.
According to the analysis section Of the FUTURE LAND USE element,
a majority of the remaining growth within the Village will be
generated by development'of four 92-1 Amendment projects within
Planning Area 6A, with buildout projected to occur in 1998. Tables
4-11A and 4-•11B identify projected daily trip generation from these
projects impacting Prosperity Farms Road segments in 1994 and 1998
(i.e., buildout date). Separate traffic generation analyses, as
part of the traffic impact analyses for each of the 92-1 Amendment
projects, were prepared as part of the related development
approvals. Information from those analyses were used to develop
the two composite trip generation scenarios shown in Tables 4-11A
and 4-11B. Also, the traffic impact on Lighthouse Drive was
analyzed using the Village's projected annual average growth rate
of 1.8 percent.
The methodology used in analyzing the Village's projected system
needs is similar to that utilized for analyzing the existing system
needs (Section 4..3.5), with additional emphasis placed on the
projected impacts of 92-1 Amendment projects on Prosperity Farms
Road segments in 1994, 1998 and 1999. Projected 1994 AADT volumes
are derived by adding the. following components: (1) the 1991 base
year background traffic counts from Table 4-6A; (2) growth during
' the 1991-1994 period derived by applying the annual compound growth
rates from Table 4-10 to .the 1991 background AADT counts; and (3)
adding the trip generation volumes from Table 4-11A.
4-24
TABLE 4-10
CONPOLND AMfUAL 6ROUTR RATES BE1lfEEN 1991 - 2010
Cg1P0(ND
CIASS tRl16ER FDOT 1991 2010 A"ffUAl
STATION ROADUAY SEENEM (1) LNS TYPE S16NALS GROUP AADT AADT SRTR.RTE
2800-2
U.S.1 (SR 5)
Lk.Pk. N.Ciy Lot to Lighihousr Dr ~
U-PA ~
6
Diulded
3
C
25586
40000
2.38
(2) U.S.1 (SR 5> Lighthouse Dr. to Parker Bridge U-PA 6 Divided 2 C 25586 40000 2.38
2812-2 U.S. 1 (SR 5) Parker Bridge to PfiA Blvd. U PA 4 Div(dtd 2 C 27902 40000 1.91
2816-2 A1A U.5.1 to McArthur State Park CO-C 2 Undiu. 1 A 7816 10000 1.31
2817-2 Northlake Blvd. Prosperity Fros. Rd. -o Southuind U-PA 6 Divided 1 C 28118 40000 1.76
2919-2 Northlake Blvd. Southuind Rd. to U.S. 1 <SR 5) U-PA 6 Divided 1 C 23398 40000 2.86
a 2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd 5 of POA Blvd to RCA Blud/Ibnei CO-C 5 Undiv. 0 B/C 15626 20000 1.31
a (3) Prosperity Fns Rd S of RfA B1udMonet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 B/C 15626 20000 1.31
a 2836-2(4>Prozperily Fos Rd Burns Rd. to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undiv. 1 B/C 13596 20000 2.05
a (5) Prosperity Fos Rd Lighthouse Dr. to Epgie Uay CO-C 3 Undiv. D 8/C 14312 20000 1.76
a 2606-2 Prosperity Fps Rd Eagle Uay to Northlake Blvd. CO-C 5 Undiv. I B/C 19312 20000 1.78
9102(6) Lighthouse Drive U.S. 1 to Prosperity Faros Road CT-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC 10197 !4338 1
(6) Lighthouse Drive Prosperity Faros Rd. io AIt. AfA CT-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC 5608 7865 1~
a The 1990 AADT uolwaes were used since they were recorded prior io the roadway construction. A reduction of the AADT
volunes in 1491 as shown on Table 4-2, indicates the effect construction inprovmenls had on ibis roadway seynent.
(I) U-PA -Urban Principal Arterial
CO-C -Canty Collector
CT-C - City Collector
(2) Usrd sane AADT volune as station 2600-1 for this roadway segieni.
(3) Used sane AADT volune as station 2804-2 for this roadway segnent.
(4) AADT volune esiinatrd }or this roadway segnent by using the percentage difference between 2806-2 and 2836-1 in 1991
and applying this percentage to the 1990 2806-2 station volune.
(5) Used sane AADT volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway segnent
(d) 2010 AADT volunes derived by applying a Impound annual average growth rate of 1.81 percent according to the anended
~futurt Land Use Elenent.
9-25
TABLE 4-11A
DAILY TRIP GENERATION - 1994
PROSPERIIY FARMS ROAD
II iR1P 6FNERATION Bi ROADUAY SE6MEM - 1994 t 1
PLAN I PLAN 11994 IITRIP II -- 1
ANFNDNENII ANENDMENI INLMBER 116ENERATE IIN, to IWS to IUest on ISouih tolUest on ISoutA of lS.Lght hselEaglr W.-I
NU16ER I NAME
I IINIT/TYPEIIRATE
I II IIP6A BIudIRCA B1vdIRCA B1vdl8urns RDIBurn
II I s RDIBurns Rdl-Eaglr U.INL. B lvd I
92-1.2
(Prosperity Harbor
N.I 54/SF
II 10
II 3061S I 1 I
231 251 2091 I
971 I
1121 I
621 I
821
92-1.3 t+ISancluary Bay 1 54MF II 7 II 181tN 231 571 1401 511 691 421 421
92-1.4 (Sanctuary Coue 1144/MF fl 7 II 4841N 631 1511 3731 1371 2361 1111 1111
92-1.5 IProsperiiy Harbor S.I 42/SF II 10 II 1741N 181 101 OI 2001 361 271 271
11451 1291 2431 7221 4851 4731 2621 2621
' TABLE 4-116
DA1lY TRIP 6ENERT10t1 - 1996
PROSPERITY FAMS ROAD
II TRIP SFHERATION BY ROAOUAY SE6MENf - 1498 t I
PLAN I PLAN 11998 IITRIP II
I
AMENOHE MI ANENg1ENT (BUILD-OUFII6ENERATE IIN. to IWS to IUest on (South tolUesl on (South oflS.Lghl hselEagle U.-I
NIMBER I NAME
I IIf11T/TYPEIIRATE
I II IIPGA B1vdIRCA B1vdIRCA BludlBurns RDIBurns RDIBurns
II I Rdl-Eagle N.INL. Blvd I
92-1.2
IProsperiiy Harbor
N.I 98/SF II 10
II SSSIS I I I
421 461 3791 I
1761 1
2D31 1
1481 I
1481
91-1.3 talSancluary Bay 1231/MF II 7 II 7801N 1021 2431 6011 2211 3801 1791 1741
92-1.4 (Sanctuary Coue 1184MF II 7 II 6181N 811 1931 4771 1751 3021 1421 1421
92-1.5 (Prosperity Harbor S.I 106/SF II 1D II 4451N
II I 471 271 DI
1 I I 5161 421 641 641
II 23981
2731 5041 14571 1
10881 I
4771 I
5381 I
5381
t Trip generation figures derived by using tAe distribution frm the traffic inpact analysis perpared for each of these
projects.
tt Used sane relative trip generation distribution as Sanctuary Covt.
9-26
The projected AADT counts for 1994 derived using the above
methodology are shown in Table 4-12 under the heading "1994
Background + PRJ" (1994 with Project). This same approach is used
in projecting AADT counts at buildout (i.e., 1998) of the four 92-1
Amendment projects. In this case, compound annual growth rates are
applied to the 1994 AADT counts to which the remaining 92-1
Amendment project trip generation volumes from Table 4-11B are
added to derive total projected volumes on the affected road
segments. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 4-13.
Finally, Table 4-14 presents traffic volumes projected for 1999.
Since the Village is projected to attain buildout by 1998, only a
small increase in traffic volumes is projected for 1999, consisting
solely of projected increase in background traffic.
Table 4-15 shows projected peak-hour volumes along with the
associated LOS for each roadway segment in the Village for 1994,
1998 and 1999, respectively.
This method may actually overstate future AADT volumes, since the
2010 Interim Transportation System Plan accounts for .the future
development of vacant land, including.the 92-1 Amendment projects,
as well as projected roadway improvements. It is therefore
concluded that the approach used in this analysis maximizes
projected AADT volumes on all the roadway segments, especially on
Prosperity Farms Road segments.
In addition the 1994, 1998, and 1999 roadway system evaluation ,
accounted fpr the potential of changing traffic characteristics
(e.g., the addition of lanes and signalized intersections) which
could change the LOS Maximum Volume Group. Only Prosperity Farms
Road was affected. It is projected that by 1998, as a result of at
least one additional signalized intersection, the Maximum Volume
Group would change from B to C. This expected occurrence is
reflected in Tables 4-13, 4-14 and 4-15.
Based upon the. projected daily traffic system analyses shown in
Tables 4-12, 4-13 and 4-14 and the peak-hour analysis shown in
Table 4-15, indicated conclusions are as follows:
1. There are no projected roadway system improvement
needs during the five-year planning period (i.e.,
to 1994);
2. Only one roadway; Prosperity .Farms Road, is
projected to have an increase in the number of
signalized intersections by 1998;
only one roadway, U.S. Highway 1, exceeded the
acceptable LOS Standard of D during the ten-year
planning period (i.e., 1999); anc~
The state-maintained segment of U.S. Highway 1 '
from Parker Bridge to PGA Boulevard is projected to .
exceed LOS D by 1999.
4-27
TABLE 4-12
' N.P.6 DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS DF ROADWAY SYSTEN - 1994
(5 YEAR PLAN4ING PER10D)
1994 1444 FDOi
• CLASS NIHBER fDOT BKGRND BKGRND LOS <3) SEGItf(
STATION ROAOUAY SEGMENT (1) INS TYPE SIGNALS GROUP AADi(2) 4PRJ ~ LOS D LOS
2800-2
U.S.1 (SR 5)
Lk.Pk. N.Cty lnt to Lighthouse Dr »_
U-PA _
6
Divided
3 ~
C
27457 ~
-
479DD _
B
(4) U.S.1 (SR S) Lighthouse Dr. to Parker Bridge U-PA 6 Divided 2 C 27457 - 47900 8
2811-2 U.S. 1 (SR 5) Parker Bridge to PGA Blud. U PA 4 Divided 2 C 29532 - 31700 D
2816-2 A1A U.S.i to McArthur State Park CO-C 2 Undiv. 1 A 8127 - 16500 A
2817-2 Northlake Blvd. Prosperity Frns. Rd. to Southaind U-PA 6 Divided i C 30261 - 47900 B
2919-2 Northlake Blvd. Souihuind Rd. to U.S. 1 (SR 5) U-PA 6 Divided 1 C 25464 - 47900 B
2804-2 Prosperity fns Rd S of PGA Blvd io RCA BludMonei CO-C 5 Undiu. 0 B 16248 17627 3250D A
Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA 81vd/Monet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undiv. i B 16248 1606) 32500 A
2836-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Burns Rd. to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undiv. 1 B 14449 14922 19125 B
Prosperity Fns Rd Lighthouse Dr. to Eagle Uay CO-C 3 Undiv. 0 B 15090 15352 19125 8
2806-2 Prosperity Fns R6 Eagle Way to Northlake Blvd. CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 B 1509D 15352 32500 A
91D2 Lighthouse Drive U.S. 1 to Prosperity Farns Road CT-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC 10761 10843 11600 D
' Lighthouse Drivr Prosperity Farns Rd. io Alt. AtA CT-C 2 Undiu. 1 VC 5918 6019 1160D C
(1) U-PA -Urban Principal Arterial
CD-C - County Collector
CT-C - City Collector
(2) )994 AADT volunes derived by applying an annual avrrage growth ratt of 1.61 percent as shown in Tablt 4-10.
(3) Mininun AADT volwae iron Table 4-4A not to be exceeded to be within the Village Standard of LOS D.
(4) Used sane AADT volune as 2800-2.
1
~-aa
TABLE 4-13
N.P.B DAILY LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS OF RORDUAY SYSTEM - 1498
(AT BUILDOUf)
CLASS NUMBER FDDT
STATION ROADUAY SEEHEtff (1) LNS TYPE SIGNALS GROUP
2800-2 U.S.1 (SR 5) Lk.Pk. N.Ciy tat to Lighthouse Dr U-PA 6 Divided 3 C
(3) U.S.I (SR 5) Lighthouse Dr. to Parker Bridge U-PA 6 Divided 2 C
2812-2 U.S. 1 (SR 5) Parker Bridge to PBA Blvd. U PA 4 Divided 2 C
2816-T A1A . U.S.1 to McArthur State Park CO-C 2 Undiu. 1 A
2817-2 NoriAlakr Blud. Prosperity Frns. Rd. to Southaind U-PA 6 Divided 1 C
2919-2 Northlake Bivd. Souihuind Rd. to U.S. 1 (SR 5) U-PA 6 Divided 1 C
2604-2 Prosperity Fns Rd S of PSA Blvd to RCA B1vdMonei CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 C
Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA Blud/Nonet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 C
2636-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Burns Rd. io lighthoust Dr. CO-C 3 Undiu. 1 C
Prosperity Fns Rd Lighthouse Dr. to Eagle Way CD-C 3 Undiv. 0 C
2606-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Eagle Uay to Norihlakt Blvd. CO-C 5 Undiv. I C
9102 Lighthouse Drive U.S. 1 to Prosperity Farns Road CT-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC
Lighthouse Driue Prosperity Farns Rd. to Alt. A1A CT-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC
t
1998 1998 FDOT
BNSRND BKGAND LOS (2) SEG;ffl
AADT ~PRJ 7 LDS D LOS
o r~ ~
30165 - 47900 B
30165 - 47900 B
31653 - 31700 E
8562 - 16500 A
32448 - 47900 B
28504 - 47900 B
17116 18560 31700 B
17116 19060 31700 B
156)1 16175 18500 C
16193 16469 18500 C
16143 16469 31700 B
10643 11014 11600
6014 6214 11600
(1) U-PA -Urban Principal Arterial
CO-C - County Coliector
CT-C - Ciiy Collector
(2) Nininw AADT uolune iron Table 4-4A not io be excreded io be within the Village Standard of LOS D.
(3) Used sane AADT uolune as 2800-2.
1
9-29
' TABLE 4-14
N.P.B DAILY LEVEL DF SERVICE ANALYSIS OF ROADUAY 5P5TEH - 1999
(TEN YEAR PLANfIN6 PER10D)
• 1999 FDOT
CLASS NUMBER FDOT BKBRND LOS (3) SEOMfI
STATION ROAOUAY SECftENI (1) LNS TYPE SIEtfALS GROUP A4DT(2) 7 LOS D LOS
2800-2 U.S.1 (SR 5) Lk.PK. N.Ciy Lni to lighthouse Dr U-PA d Divided 3 C 30883 47900 B
(4) U.S.i (5R 5) Lighthouse Dr. to Parker. Bridge U-PA 6 Divided 2 C 30883 47900 B
2612-1 U.S. 1 (SR 5) Parker Bridge io PGA Blvd. U PA 4 Divided 2 C 32462 31700 E
2816-2 AIA U.S.1 to NcArthur State Park CO-C 2 Undiv. 1 A 8674 16500 A
2817-2 Northlake Bivd. Prosprrity Fros, Rd. to Southuind U-PA 6 ,Divided i C 33020 47900 B
2919-2 Northlake Blud. Southuind Rd. to U.S. 1 (SR 5) U-PA 6 Divided 1 C 29319 47900 B
2804-2 Prosperity fns Rd S of PGA Blud to RCA Blvd/Nonet CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 C 16803 31700 B
Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA 81vd/Monet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undiv. 1 C 19310 31700 B
2836-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Burns Rd. to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undiv. 1 C 16507 18500 C
Prosperity Fns Rd lighthouse Dr. to Eagle Uay CO-C 3 Undiv. 0 C 16762 18500 C
' 2806-2
9102 Prosperity Fns Rd
Lighthouse Drive Eagle Way to Northlake Blud.
U.S. 1 to Prosperity Farns Road CO-C
CT-C 5
2 Undiv.
Undiv. 1
1 C
VC 16762
11213 31700
11600 B
D
Lighthouse Drive Prosperity Farns Rd. to Alt. A1A C1-C 2 Undiv. 1 VC 6326 11600 C
(I) U-PA -Urban Principal Arterial
Co-C - county Collector
CT-C - Ciiy Collector
(2) 1999 MDT volunes derived by applying an annual average growth rate of 1.81 percent as shown in lablr 4-10.
(3) Mininun AADT vola~e fran Table 4-4A not to be exceeded io be xithin the Village Standard of LOS D.
(4) Used sane AADT volune as 2800-2.
1
9-30
TABLE 4-15
VILLAGE OF NORTH PAIR BEACH
PROJECTED PEAK HOUR CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF ROAONAY SYSTEN
1
FDDT 1994 1948 1999
CLASS LOS PK.NR(2) PK NRa/ PK 1p(a/ PK NR}/
STATION ROADUAY SEGNEM (1) lNS TYPE GROUP ~ LOS D LDS as LOS as LOS as
2600-2 U.5.1 (SR 5> Lk.Pk. N.Ctr Lnt to Lighthouse Dr U-PA 6 Divided C 4600 1271/6 2714/8 2779/6
U.S.1 (SR 5) Lighthouse Dr. to Parker Bridge U-PA d Diuided C 4600 1271/8 2714/8 2779/8
2612-2 U.S. 1 (SR 5) Parker Bridge to PtiA Blvd. U-PA 4 Divided C 3040 2d58/C 286d/D 2921/0
261d-2 AtA U.S.1 to NcArthur Siate Park CO-C 2 Undiv. A 1580 731/A 735/A 781/A
2817-1 Northlake Blvd. Prosperity Frns. Rd. to Souihwind U-PA d Diuided C 4600 1723/8 2920/6 2972/8
2919-2 Northlake Blud. Southaind Rd. to U.S. 1 (SR 5) U-PA d Diuided C 4600 2639/8 2565/8 2639/8
2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd S of PGA Blud to RCA B1udMonet CO-C 5 Undiv. B/C(5) 3120/304 1586/A 1670/8 1692/6
(3) Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA B1udMonet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undiv. B/C(5) 3120/304 1626/A 1715/8 1738/6
2836-2 Prosperity Fos Rd Burns Rd. to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undiv. B/C(5) 1838/17) 1343/6 14561C 1466/C
(4) Prosperity Fns Rd Lighthouse Dr. to Eagle Nay CD-C 3 Undiv. B/C(5) 1838/177 1381/B 146?1C 150
2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Eaglt Uay to Northlake Blvd. CO-C S Undiv. B/C(5) 3120/304 1382/8 1482/8 150
9102 lighthouse Drive U.S. 1 to Prosperity Farns Road CF-C 2 Undiv. VC 1110 976/0 991/0 100
Lighihoust Drive Prosperity Farns Rd. to.Rlt. AfA CT-C 2 Undlu. VC 1110 533/C 554/C . 5d9/C
a Peak hour uolunes derived using a peaking characteristic of 9Y. applied to the 1994, 1990 ~ 1999 AADT uolunes fron
Tablrs 4-12, 4-13 and 4-14, respectively.
as Peak hour LOS obtained iron Table 4-4B.
(1) U-PA -Urban Principal Arterial
CO-C -County Collector
CT-C - City Collector
<2) Nininun Prak Nour volune frm Tablt 4-4B not to be exceeded to be within the Village Standard of LOS D.
(3) Used sane Peak volune as station 2804-2 for this roadway segaeni.
(4) Used sane Peak volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway segnent.
(5) Nininun Peak Hour Group changed in 1990 due to projected signal addition ai RCA Blud.
9-31
4.3.8 Issues and Opportunities
' The transportation system has been generally efficient in
circulating traffic in and through the Village. Maintenance
of the existing roads and streets has been effectuated on an
annual basis, and capital improvements to the system have been
planned well in advance. The Village's annual maintenance
program consists of repairs, completed on an "as needed" basis
and an annual resurfacing program (i.e., $60,000 per year)
which results in the resurfacing of local streets every eight
years. The Village has continued to work with other levels of
government regarding roads that are under a jurisdiction other
than North Palm Beach. These cooperative and coordinated
efforts, in conjunction with local programs, have provided an
effective road and street system in North Palm Beach.
However, the construction/maintenance of roadway improvements
is one of the Village's largest annual fiscal challenges. As
indicated in sections 4.3.2 and 4.3.4, the Village should
direct its efforts to correct existing roadway deficiencies,
and implement future improvements in ordev to maintain the
recommended LOS standards. Each of the major roadway issues
are discussed below with-the future projected roadway system
shown in Figure 4-2.
_4...3.8.1 U.S. Hiahwav 1 (SR 51
' According ~o the roadway analyses performed in the previous
sections, the segment of U.S. Highway 1 from Parker Bridge north
through the Village will exceed the average daily traffic LOS D
within the ten-year planning period (ref: Tables 4-13 and 4-14).
The portion of U.S. Highway i from Parker Bridge South through the
Village is an existing six-lane, divided highway with a projected
LOS in 1999 of B/B. It can be seen from this analysis that
improving the deficient segment of U.S. Highway 1 from four-lane,
divided to six-lane, divided highway would improve the LOS from E/D
in 1999 to B/B.
Since U.S. Highway 1 is a Federal Primary Highway under state
jurisdiction, the Village has no direct responsibility regarding
improvements, but should continue to coordinate with the Florida
Department of Transportation and the Palm Beach County Metropolitan
Planning Organization to assist in bringing about the necessary
improvements.
According to the latest Transportation Improvement Program, five-
year work program (FY 92-97) adopted by the MPO, Parker Bridge
which was scheduled to be widened from a four-lane drawbridge to a
six=lane drawbridge in FY 93/94, has been rescheduled to FY 94/95
in order to complete preliminary engineering for widening the
segment of U.S. Highway:l from Parker Bridge to just south of
' Indiantown Road. Schedules for the actual construction work on the
bridge and road widening will not be made until the preliminary
engineering studies have been completed. Based on the Accident
Data Analysis section, the intersection at U.S. Highway 1 and
9-32
a
Q
Z
O
_
~ o
N f
Q W
~ J
~ ~
W (~ ~
K
~
U ~
C7 U *-
LL ~-
ll.
Q
~ _. _~
W YY ~Y..Y
~ ~
a .,.•~•`
~1V
ll...-1 ~ ~ 1p1p1j1yYa~~' ~ ~.~/
I ~
N
~k . n~ VI
[ , e
~ e/
~ ~y , 11
'~1Y,, p
4 y
• ( ~ +
p IIOYII a Ill7' 7 ~ ~ iY ~
a.. I : -~ ~`.«rsa
c°° ~
3:
„9 a
p
N a
z
i
~ ~
00
G 4
e a~'i
~ `~
`~ -ro~
N . I
~i ~
~ Nj 1
to o
~,
.'~-I
a
F
2
+'
~~
' a
•s
~ ~
`~ a fC
~ ~
~ U
~ w
a
v
~
g
r o
~ 3
I~~~y..1'1
(n
p
U
~
E"
U
oGEpH
pj~pHj`c I -
i~
1
6i~
C7 m
0
tMYI tl IOt 01110X11 IMYI tl •yY t11YY/ t11Y)V YOYV Iy tO1t10Y11 ty Yl tl
\
"""
N t i ~ to
V ~ ~ ~ N 5~~
r7 > ~ t INS 1 ~'/
• N ~
Q m ! ~ #.: pl y
y> U ~ _ ~# ~
[ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
.o ~ lf~'d ~ ~ ~
G1 r1 ~ ~'
E P ~ v
z yQ. ~
a pY '¢ a
b ~ a ~c
~ ro
d
t
°9
N
a
a,
v
a
E
a
U N
w I
aN
zrn
v
U)
N
.~
Ol
a
~
i
4-33
Golfview Road, immediately north of Parker Bridge, has been the
location of the most accidents on U.S. Highway 1 within the
' Village. The accidents that have occurred at Parker Bridge (i.e.,
3) and the Golfview Road intersection (i.e., 9) over the seven
months examined in Table 4-8, cumulatively represent thirty-nine
percent of all the accidents on U.S. Highway 1. Therefore, the
proposed widening of U.S. Highway 1 north of Parker Bridge could
significantly reduce accident frequency.
Another significant issue that should be thoroughly studied by FDOT
and monitored by the Village is the operation of Parker Bridge.
FDOT's solution to this problem is to replace the existing movable-
span bridge with a fixed-span, six-lane bridge. FDOT has held
public hearings in North Palm Beach on this issue and has met with
opposition due to the potential magnitude of impacts upon adjacent
properties. The issues brought up at the public hearings should be
thoroughly researched prior to any decision to construct a fixed-
span bridge.
4.3.8.2 Northlake Boulevard
Northlake Boulevard, a state-maintained road, is a six-lane,
divided arterial that extends from U.S. Highway 1 west beyond North
Palm Beach's western corporate limit. The Northlake Boulevard
Bridge, which is approximately 0.7 miles west of U.S. Highway 1,
has been widened from four to six lanes with construction completed
' in 1988. This bridge improvement has significantly improved the
traffic flow through this section of Northlake Boulevard.
According to the latest Transportation Improvement Program, five-
year work program (FY 92-97) there are no scheduled improvements to
the segments within the Village.
4.3.8.3 SR AlA
This roadway is presently a state road with FDOT having the
maintenance responsibility; however, FDOT is negotiating with Palm
Beach County to have the road designated as a county road. The
portion of SR AlA to the south, extending through Singer Island
into the City of Riviera Beach, has been improved to-three lanes
for approximately 2.25 miles and from that point south to U.S.
Highway 1 exists as a four-lane, divided roadway. SR AlA within
the Village is a two-lane facility extending approximately three
miles from John D. MacArthur State Park to U.S. Highway 1 at PGA
Boulevard, a six-lane intersection, with only one signal over this
entire length. The analyses performed herein and confirmed by the
TEST-CAR field results justified the use.of the Generalized Group
A table for two-way arterials with less than 0.75 signalized
intersections per mile. The results from Tables 4-12, 4-13, 4-14
and 4-15 clearly indicate that this two-lane portion will be at LOS
A/A through the year 1999. Further, no additional signals are
' projected along this roadway segment. Consideration was given to
the possibility of a signal at the entrance to John D. MacArthur
State Park but current traffic patterns and accident data do not
justify this being of any immediate concern. Even if an additional
9-39
signal were to be placed in service, this segment of AlA would
still be evaluated under Group A of Tables 4-4A and 4-4B. '
The MPO's Transportation Improvement Program, five-year work
program (FY 92-97), shows no scheduled widening of this segment.
The only indicated improvements scheduled are for resurfacing and
repaving the section of .AlA. from north of Burnt Bridge to U.S.
Highway 1 in FY 92-93. Previously scheduled improvements for the
reconstruction of Burnt Bridge have been completed with a notable
reduction in accidents.
The Village considers this roadway a "Constrained Facility," due to
it being on a barrier island in close proximity to Lake Worth.
This is a situation in which additional improvements to widen this
segment of AlA should not be pursued due to the lack of available
right-of-way. Furthermore, any widening of this segment of AlA
would raise serious environmental concerns related to the necessity
of vegetation removal (i.e., mangroves, seagrapes, etc.) and
filling of a recognized environmentally sensitive area. Both the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) and the
Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR), along with the
County's Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM)
have serious concerns regarding the environmental impacts of any
future development, including widening of roadways in this area.
The Village, Palm Beach County, FDER, FDNR, FDOT and all other '
interested agencies should coordinate closely with one another
regarding any future development of John D. MacArthur State Park.
only improvements to. the existing two-lane pavement alignments at
dangerous points on the roadway should be emphasized. Improvements
that should be considered are additional warning signs or flashing
warning lights, reduced speed limit, and provision of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway to keep frequent cyclists off the road.
The Village should support and promote the proposed Bicycle Path
Plan to create a bicycle lane from the eastern landing of the Blue
Heron Boulevard Bridge on Singer Island to Carlin Park. This plan,
which received conceptual approval from the Palm Beach County
Commission on January 28, 1992, is being promoted by the County's
Linked Open Space Committee which is attempting to join wildlife
preserves and beaches by bicycle/pedestrian lanes throughout Palm
Beach County.
Since there are adequate alternative arterial routes around this
area and this roadway passes through a State Park, the Village
should, if this segment .of AlA drops below LOS D/D, apply to the
County for a "Constrained Roadways at Lower Level of Service"
(GRACES) designation.
4.3.8.4 Prosperity Farms Road
This roadway is a County-maintained road that passes through the '
Village. According to the Palm Beach County Engineering
Department's Construction Coordination Division, recent
9-35
improvements to Prosperity Farms Road affecting the Village were
divided into two segments: (1) 10th Avenue in Lake Park to Burns
' Road; and (2) Burns Road to PGA Boulevard. Construction
improvements began on both segments in October 1990 with the
segment between Burns Road and PGA Boulevard completed in June
1991. The segment between 10th Avenue and Burns Road is in the
final stages of completion. No additional roadway improvements
have been scheduled according to Palm Beach County's Five-Year Road
Program.
Prosperity Farms Road extends through the Village providing a
convenient north/south route to adjacent areas outside the
Village's corporate limits. Since the observed operational
character of this roadway is that of an arterial, Prosperity Farms
Road is evaluated as a Class I arterial with 1.15 signalized
intersections per mile (i.e., three signals over its 2.6-mile
length) placing it under Group B rather than as a collector as
designated by the County. Evaluated in this way, none of the
segments dropped below LOS B/B by 1994.
As a result of the majority of the remaining growth within the
Village being generated by development projects within Planning
Area 6A, the projected future analysis took into account the
possibility of the existing flashing yellow light at the
intersection of RCA Boulevard/Monet Road becoming a signalized
intersection by buildout (1998). The addition of this signal will
change the signalized intersection Group from B to C as shown in
Tables 4-13, 4-14 and 4-15. However, there are still two other
flashing lights along Prosperity Farms Road, one at its
intersection with Richard Road and the other at its intersection at
Allamanda Lane. Even if these two flashing lights were to become
permanent signalized intersections, the Generalized Table Group
would not change since it would remain below 2.5 signalized
intersections per mile. Therefore none of the segments along
Prosperity Farms Road will drop below LOS C/C by the ten-year
planning period, 1999.
The Village wishes to maintain
Prosperity Farms Road. Therefore,
further widening of this roadway.
the neighborhood character of
the Village is opposed to any
4.3.8.5 Lighthouse Drive
1
Lighthouse Drive is a Village-maintained road identified as a local
collector street providing both land access and traffic circulation
service within the residential and commercial areas of the Village.
According to the roadway analyses performed in the previous
sections, the segment of Lighthouse Drive from U.S. Highway 1 west
to Prosperity Farms Road is currently at LOS D and is projected to
remain at LOS D through the ten-year Planning Period (1999).
However, by 1999, Lighthouse Drive is nearly at the maximum limit
of LOS D. Therefore, if any FDOT updates to the Generalized Tables
reduce the LOS maximum levels from those utilized herein or the MPO
9-36
updates the 2010 Interim Transportation System Plan increasing
projected traffic volumes utilized herein, then Lighthouse Drive '
would exceed LOS D after 1999.
If this happens, the Village should consider adopting LOS E for
Lighthouse Drive. FDOT has indicated in its Level of Service
Standards and Guidelines Manual, for existing urbanized areas, a
minimum acceptable standard of LOS E for minor arterials and
"others" which includes collectors and local streets. In this way,
FDOT acknowledges the concept of some acceptable roadway congestion
as a tradeoff for other urban amenities and special considerations
to reflect local realities. In order to maintain the existing
residential character as well as the limited right-of-way easements
along Lighthouse Drive, a future modification from LOS D to LOS E
can be justified.
4.3.8.6 Interaovernmental Coordination
Intergovernmental coordination is essential for the development of
a cost-efficient approach to obtain traffic circulation system
improvements within the Village. Since the arterial streets in
North Palm Beach are under the jurisdiction of other levels of
government, it is clear that the Village does not possess the
resources nor is it fiscally responsible for correcting all the
traffic circulation system needs identified in this element.
Therefore, it is necessary for the Village to review the ,
transportation improvement plans and programs prepared by the
County and FDOT. In this way, the dollars expended by the Village
to improve its traffic circulation system may be complemented or
even enhanced by the activities of the County and FDOT.
4.3.8.7 Future Riaht-of-Way Protection
one area of coordination should include the preservation and
protection of rights-of-way for future roadway improvements and
construction. With the escalating value of land and costs entailed
in right-of-way acquisition, it becomes essential that the Village
protect roadway corridors to the extent possible in advance.
Increased right-of-way, costs reduce funds available for
construction. FDOT -has indicated in the 1987 Florida
Transportation Plan that it will consider, as part of its project
priority analysis, the availability and protection of rights-of-way
and will place a higher funding priority on projects located where
right of preservation and protection measures have been
implemented. Therefore, it would be advantageous for the Village
to utilize such techniques as setback requirements, zoning
restrictions, right-of-way protection regulations and official
traffic-way maps to preserve and protect existing and future
rights-of-way, particularly on the segment of U.S. Highway 1
located north of Parker~Bridge.
1
9-37
4.3.8.8 Mass Transit
' Public transportation/mass transit was not considered, at this
time, as an appropriate solution for improving the level of service
on the Village's roadways, due mainly to its population size. The
population was found to be of neither sufficient magnitude nor
density to ensure cost-effectiveness. According to Chapter 9J-
5.008, Florida Administrative Code, a mass transit element needs to
be prepared when the population reaches 50,000 or more, which is
far above the Village's population at buildout (i.e., 14,898). The
provision of a public transportation system in Palm Beach County
has been in the form of bus service. The Palm Beach County
Transportation Authority (COTRAN) operates and maintains this
system.
The Village supports COTRAN with service provided on a thirty-
minute interval on weekdays beginning at 8:50 in the morning and
concluding at 6:50 in the afternoon. Saturday service is provided
on a sixty-minute interval from 8:50 a.m. to 5:50 p.m. with no
service provided on Sunday. Eight buses currently run during
weekdays and four buses. on Saturday within the Village with an
increase to fifteen buses planned within the next five years. The
COTRAN route serving North Palm Beach goes from its northern
terminus at the Gardens Mall on PGA Boulevard south to Lake Worth;
an estimated 628,000 passengers per year use this route.
' A regional public transportation system does not exist, but the
Village continues to support the concept. ,
4 3 8 9 Financial Options for Fundina Improvements
The construction of roadway improvements is a major fiscal
challenge. National, state and local transportation programs have
long been supported by taxing the user. These "user taxes" have
included motor fuel taxes, motor vehicle license fees, and revenue
bonds secured either by tolls or a pledge of county motor fuel tax
collections, as well as non-user taxes such as general obligation
bonds. Some of these revenue sources, such as motor fuel taxes and
revenue bonds, are available to the Village; others are only
available at the State level.
The Village has other transportation finance options available such
as special assessment fees, redevelopment fees, and impact fees.
The Village may provide transportation improvements and impose
special assessments upon properties that directly benefit from the
improvements.
1
9-38
ATTACHMENT 4-1
TEST-CAR Method
Field data for each of the six (6) test runs performed on the five
(5) functionally classified roadways within the Village according
to the procedures described in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual,
Chapter 11.
Table Roadway
A U.S. Highway 1 (SR5)
B Northlake Blvd. (SR 809)
C SR AlA
D Prosperity Farms Road
E Lighthouse Drive
1
1
4-39
ATTACHMENT 4-1
1
u
TABLE A
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH
COEiPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WDRKSHEET
.USING
TEST-CAR FiETHOD
Roadway U. S. HIGHWAY 1
Direction: NORTH k SOUTH BOLND
Date: 1/17/92
Time: 10:00 AM
I I I i II I 1 (ISum of ISum of I II I
I I I (FREE IINORTH ISDUTH I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERTALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOLND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTIDN
I I(mi.) (CLASS
I I I(mph)II(sec> I(sec>
1
I I I I
1 II(sec) a I
11 (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c
1
Ilkshore-t1.L.Blvdl .241
1 =
135
II 33.81 =
24.81 I
II 29.31 I I I
.241 29.511 I
8 I
2 IN.Lk-Anchorage I .231 I 135 II 30.01 16.11 II 24.11 .231 34.411 B I
3 (Anchorage-Lthse I .471 I 135 II 48.21 41.91 II 45.11 .471 37.511 A 1
4 Ilthse-Anchorage I .281 I~ 135 II 27.81 26.81 11 27.31 .281 36.911 A I
5 (Anchorage-Yacht I .331 1 135 II 31.31 31.71 II 31.51 .331 37.711 A I
6 (Yacht-Golfview I .621 1 140 II 60.01 46.01 II 54.01 .621 41.311 A I
7 (Golfview-PGA 1 .761 1 140 II 61.01 59.01 II 60.01 .761 45.611 A I
II
Dverall facility LOS 271.2 2.93 38.9
Roadway U.S. HIGHdAY 1
Direction: North k South Bound
Date: 2/21/92
Times 9:15 AM
I 1 1 I II I 1 (ISum of ISum of 1 II I
I I I (FREE IINORTH ISOUfH I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOLND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIOIfIDESCRIPTION
I I(mi.) IClASS
I 1 I(mph)11(sec) ((sec) i
I=11 I 1= II (sec.) I (mi J ((mph) IISec. c I
1
1
ILkshore-N.L.Blvdl .241
I
1 35
II 26.41 32.21 1
I
I1 29.31 I II I
.241 29.511 6 I
2 IN.Lk-Anchorage I .231 I 135 II 16.61 28.11 II 23.41 .231 35:511 A 1
3 (Anchorage-Lthse I .471 I 135 II 45.21 52.31 11 48.81 .471 34.711 B I
4 ILihse-Anchorage I .281 I 135 II 25.81 32.71 11 29.21 .281 34.511 B I
5 (Anchorage-Yacht I .331 I 1 35 II 28.51 29.11 II 28.81 .331 41.211 A I
6 (Yacht-Golfview I .621 I 14D II 49.61 47.61 II 46.71 .621 45.611 A I
7 (Golfview-PGA I .761 1 140 II 68.01 67.01 II 67.51
III .761 40.511 A i
Dverall Facility LOS 275.6 2.93 38.3 A
1
a. Average travel time over two runs during the 8:00-10:00 AM time period.
b. Calculated by (36DD><Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time).
c. LOS taken from 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 11-1, arterial class I.
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
9-90
ATTACHIINT 4-1
TABLE A '
VILIABE OF NORTH PALM BEACH
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway U. S. HIGHWAY t Date: 2/21/92
Direction: NORTH k SOUTH BOUND Times 12s15PM
I I 1 1 II I I IIS:un of (Sum of I II 1
I 1 I (FREE IINORTH (SOUTH 1 IlTime by ILength bylArterfalllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBORfD (BOUND I IlSection (Section ISpeed IILOS By I
.SELTIONIDESCRiPTION
--- I I<mi.) (CLASS
I I I(mph)II(sec> ((sec) I
I=1 I 1 11(sec) a l (mi. ) ((mph) b IISec. c l
1
ILKshore-N.L.Blvdl .241
I
1 35 1
II 26.61 31.21 = I I I
II 28.91 1 I I
.241 29.911 I
B I
2 IN.Lk-Anchorage I .231 1 1 35 II 4D.91 48.41 11 44.71 .231 18.511 D I
3 (Anchorage-Lthse I .471 I 135 II 81.01 73.01 II 77.01 .471 22.011 C 1
4 ILthse-Anchorage I .281 I 1 35 II 36.61 43.81 II 4D.21 .261 25.111 C I
5 (Anchorage-Yacht 1 .331 I 135 II 27.21 35.41 11 31.31 .331 37.911 A I
6 (Yacht-Golfview I .621 I 14D II 63.61 45.11 II 54.41 .621 41.111 A I
7 (Golfview-PGA I .761 [. i. 40 II 60.51 70.41 II 65.51
II .761 41.811 A I
Overall Facility LOS 341.9 2.93 .30.6 B '
Roadway U.S. HIGHWAY 1 Date: 2/24/92
Direction: NORTH k SOUTH BOItJD Time: 1:tOPM
1 I 1 I II I I IISum of (Sum of I II I
I I I (FREE IINORTH ISDUTH I IlTime by ILength bylArterialllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLMD IBOLND 1 IlSection (Section ISpeed IILOS By 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
1 I(mi J (CLASS
I I(mph)II(sec) ((sec) 1
1 li(sec) a l (mi J ((mph) b IISec. c l
I
1 1
ILkshore-N.L.Bludl .241 I =
135 11 I 1=
11 27.21 3D.41 11 I
I1 28.81 I II
.241 30.011 B 1
2 IN.Lk~nchorage I .231 1 135 II 29.81 34.41 II 32.11 .231 25.811 C I
3 (Anchorage-Lthse I .471 I 135 II 60.41 51.01 II 55.71 .471 30.411 B I
4 ILihse-Anchorage 1 .281 1 135 II 30.71 34.51 II 32.61 .261 3D.911 B I
5 (Anchorage-Yacht 1 .331 1 135 II 33.21 44.61 11 36.91 .331 30.511 B I
6 (Yacht-Golfview I .621 I 1 4D II 6D.81 80.01 II 70.41 .621 31.711 B I
7 (Golfview-PGA I .761 I 140 II 65.91 93.31 II 79.61
II .761 34.411 B I
Overall Facility LDS 338.1 2.93 31.2 B
a. Average travel time over two runs during the 12:00-2s00PM time period.
b. Calculated by (3600>(Sum of Length>/(Sum of Time)
c. LOS taken from 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 1l-1, arterial class I. '
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
9-41
ATTACH1ENi 4-1
1
I` JI
1
TABLE A
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALN BEACH
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL IEVEI OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
Roadway U. S. HIGHWAY 1
Direction: NORTH k SOUTH BOUND
USING
TEST-CAR METHDD
Date: 2/21/92
Time: 4:45PM
I I I I it I I IISum of (Sum of i II I
I 1 I (FREE IlNorth ISOUfH ' ~I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFL041 IIBOLND IBOLt~N I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
I I<mi.) (C
I I LASS 1(mph>11(sec> ((sec) I
1=11==I 1= II(sec) a l (mi. ) 1(mpA) b IISec. c l
I
ILkshore-N.L.Blvdl .241
I
1.35
II 35.41 37.01 II I=
II 36.21 ~1 II
.241 23.911 I
C I
2 IN.Lk-Anchorage I .231 1 135 II 29.11 27.81 II 28.51 .231 29.111 B 1
3 (Anchorage-Lthse I .471 I 1 35 II 38.31 61.81 II 50.01 .471 33.811 B i
4 ILthse-Anchorage I .261 1 135 II 28.71 48.71 11 38.71 .261 26.011 C I
5 (Anchorage-Yacht I .331 I 135 II 29.01 36.21 II 32.61 ,331 36.411 A I
6 (Yacht-Golfuiew I .621 !- 1 40 II 70.81 50.41 II 60.61 .621 36.611 A I
7 IGolfview-PGA I .761 I 140 II 65.61 70.11 II 67.91
it .761 4D.311 A I
Overall Facility LOS 314.6 2.93 33.5
Roadway U.S. HIGHWAY 1
Directions NORTH & SDUfH BOLND
Date: 2/24/92
Time: 4:OOPM
I I I 1. 11 I 1 IISum of (Sum of I II I
I I I (FREE IINORTH (SOUTH I IlTime by (Length bylArterialllArteriall
ISEOTiON ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOLND 1 IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTlON
-I I(mi.) (CLASS
1=1 I(mph)II(sec) ((sec) I
1=11 II(sec> a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c 1
1
ILkshore-N.L.Bludl .241
1
135 I 1=
II 27.41 35.01 1I I
II 31.21 I II
.241 27.711 i
C I
2 IN.Lk-Anchorage I .231 1 135 II 26.81 32.01 it 29.41 .231 28.211 B 1
3 (Anchorage-Lthse I .471 I 1 35 II 39.61 57.81 II 48.71 .471 34.711 B I
4 ILihse-Anchorage I .281 I 1 35 II 36.41 4D.01 11 38.21 .261 26.411 C 1
5 (Anchorage-Yacht 1 .331 I i 35 II 29.61 33.81 II 31.71 .331 37.511 A 1
6 (Yacht-Golfview 1 .621 1 140 II 55.61 60.21 II 57.91 .621 36.511 A I
7 IGolfview-PGA
- 1 .761 I 1 40 II 66.31 69.31 II 67.81
II .761 40.411 A I
Overall Facility LDS 304.9
a. Average travel time over two runs during the 4:DD - 6:DOPM time period.
b. Calculated by (3600)<Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time)
c. LOS taken from 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table ll-t, arterial class I.
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
2.93 34.6
9-92
ATTACH1ENi 4-1
TABLE B
VILLAGE OF NORFH PALM BFACH '
COIMUTATIOM OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway NORTHLAKE BLVD. (SR 650) Date: 1/17/92
Direction: EAST k WEST BDIND Time: 10:16AM
1 I I I II I I (ISum of ISum of I it I
I I 1 (FREE IIEAST IWESI I IlTime by ILength bylArterialltArteriall
ISECIION ILENGTHIARIERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOIND I IlSection ISectlon ISpred IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPIION 1(mi.> (CLASS 1(mph)II(sec> ((sec) I il(sec) a 1 (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c I
I I=I (=11 1 1=11 I I II I
1 IPsprty-Southwindl .531 I 135 II .51.51 52.91 II 52.21 ,531 36.611 A I
2 ISouthwind-U.S.1 I .611 I 135 II 55.01 60.D1 II 57.51 .611 30.211 A I
IJ ~~
Overall Facility LOS 109.7 1.14 37.4
Roadway NORTHLAKE BLVD. (SR B50)
Direction: FAST k WEST BOl1ND
Oate: 2/2l/92
Time: 9:30AY
I I I I II 1 I (ISum of ISum of i II I
1 I I (FREE IlEast (West I IlTime by ILength bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTER(ALIFLOW IIBOLTID IBOIND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) (CLASS I(mph)11(sec) I(se0 I II(sec) a I (mi J ((mph) b IISec. c 1
I I I ~I~II I 1=11 I I II 1
1 IPsprty-Southwindl .531 1 135 II 50.21 50.11 II 50.21 .531 38.011 A 1
2 ISouthwind-U.S.1 I .611 I 135 II 52.61 55.41 II 54.01 .611 40.711 A 1
It
Overall Facility LOS 104.2 1.14 39.4
Roadway NORTHLAKE BLVD. <SR 650)
Direction: EAST & WEST BDIND
Date: 2/2l/92
Time: 1s43PM
I I I I 11 I i (ISum of ISum of I II I
i I I (FREE IlEast (West I IlTime by ILength bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBDI~ID IBDLND 1 IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPiION I(mi.) (CLASS I(mph)II(sec) I(sec> I 11(seQ a I (mi J ((mph) b IISec. c I
I I 1 I=I I 1 1=11 1 I I I I
1 IPsprty-Southwindl .531 I 1 35 II 55.11 61.91 II 56.51 .531 32.611 B I
2 ISo_uthwind-U.S.1 I .611 I 135 II 52.91 69.11 II 61.01 .611 36.011 A I
II
Overall facility LOS 119.5 1.14 34.3 B
a. Average travel time of both directions during the time periods indicated.
b. Calculated by (3600)(Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time)
c. LOS taken from 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Table It-1, arterial class I.
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manuals Chapter 11.
9-93
ATTACHIENT 4-1
TABLE B
' VILLAGE OF NDRTH PALM BEACH
COMPUTATION DF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway NDRTHLAKE BLVD. (SR 850) Date: Z/24/92
Directions FAST & WEST BOUND Times 1s22PM
I I I I II 1 I (ISum of ISum of I II I
I I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by ILength bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFL041 IIBOl1ND IBOLND 1 IlSection ISectlon ISpeed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.> (CLASS I<mph)II(sec> ((sec) I II(sec> a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. d I
I I I III 1 - I-II I I II I
1 IPsprty-Southwindl .531 I 135 II 50.11 56.91 II 53.51 .531 35.711 A I
2 ISouthwind-U.S.1 i .611 I 135 II 57.71 65.91 II 61.61 .611 35.511 A I
= III
Overall Facility LDS 115.3 1.14 35.6 A
Roadway NORTHLAKE BLVD. (SR 850) Date: 2121/92
Direction: EAST & WEST BOUND _ Time: 4s45PM
' I I I I II I I (ISum of ISum of I II I
1 I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST 1 IlTime by ILength bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOLND I IlSection (Section ISpeed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCR(PTION I(mi.) ICIASS
I I i I(mph)II(sec) I(sec> I
l
ll II(sec) a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. d 1
1 IPsprty-Southwindl .531 I o
1 35 I 1
II 72.51 49.21 11 I I II I
II 60.91 .531 31.411 B I
2 ISouthwind-U.S.1 I .sill 1 135 II 51.61 57.41 II 54.51 .611 40.311 A I
Overall Facility LOS ~ 11~ >~
115.3 1.14 35.6 A
Roadway : NORTNLAKE BLVD. (SR B5O) Date: 2/24/92
Directions EAST & WEST BOLND Times 5:20PM
: I 1 I II I I (ISum of ISum of I 11 I
I 1 I (FREE IIEA5T (WEST 1 IlTime by ILength bylArterialllArteriail
(SECTION ILENBTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBDLND IBDLND I IlSection ISrctis>n ISpeed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION 1(mi.> IClASS
I I~sl I(mph)II(sec> 1(sec) 1
Iii I il(sec) a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. d I
1 IPsprty-Southwindl .531 1
135 I IC
II 75.21 53.21 I 1~~1 I I I I
II 64.21 .531 29.711 B 1
2 ISouthwind-U.S.I t .611 I
- 1 35 II 70.51 54.31 II 62.41 .611 35.211 A I
II
Overall Facility LOS 126.6 1.14 32.4
' a. Average travel time of both directions during the time periods indicated.
b. Calculated by (360O)(Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time).
c. LOS taken from 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 11-1, arterial class 1.
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
9-99
ATTACHMEtfT 4-1
TABLE C
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH '
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway CTY. RD. ALA. Date: !/17/92
'Direction: EAST k WEST BOIND Time: 11:23AM
I 1 I I 11 I I IISum of (Sum of I I I 1
1 I 1 (FREE IIFAST -WEST I IlTime by (Length bylArterialllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOItfD IBOItJD I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) (CLASS ((mph>11(cec) ((sec) I II(sec) a I (ml.) 1(mph) b IISec. c 1
I i-I 1=11 I 1=11 1 I II 1
1 (PGA -Lost Tree I .751 I 1 35 II 83.41 81.21 11 62.31 .751 32.611 B I
2 (PGA - Lost Tree I 2.251 I• 1 45 II 174.61 171.81 II 173.21 2.251 46.811 A I
II
Overall Facility LOS 255.5 3.OD 42.3 A
Roadway : CTY. RD. A1A.
Direction: EAST & WEST BOLND
Date: 2/2l/92
Times 1Ot10A`1
I 1 I I II' I I ~ IISum of (Sum of I II
1 I I (FREE IIFAST (WEST I IlTime by (length bylArteria111Arterial
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOItfD 1 IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) (CLASS I(mph)11(sec) 1(uc> I II(sec> a I (mi.> ((mph) b IISec. c 1
I 1=1 1~11~-~I I=I Imo--I I I I I
1 (PGA - Lost Tree I .751 I 135 II 88.71 103.41 II 96.11 .751 20.111 B 1
2 IPOA - lost Tree I 2.251 1 1 45 II 199.41 217.21 II 208.31 2.251 36.911 A I
II
Overall Facility LOS 304.3 3.00 35.5
Roadway : CTY. R0. A1A.
Direction: EAST k WEST BDIRJD
Date: ?/2l/92
Times 12t00AM
I I I I II i I IISum of (Sum of I II I
I I I (FREE !LEAST (WEST I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteri:11
(SECTION ILFNGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOl1JD IBOIIND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By 1
SELTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.> ICIASS I(mph)II(sec) ((sec) I II(sec) a I <mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c I
I I~-1 111 ICI=II I I II 1
1 (PGA - Lost Tree I .751 1 135 II 62.81 69.21 II 66.01 .751 31.411 B I
2 (Lost Tret-St.Pk.l 2.251 I 145 II 175.61 172.11 II 173.91 2.251 46.611 A I
II
Overall Facility LOS 259.9 3.00 41.6 A
a. Average travel time of both directions during the
b. Calculated by (3600>(Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time).
c. LOS taken from 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Table
Source: 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
time periods indicated. '
l1-1, arterial class I.
9-95
ATTACHMENT 4-1
1
~I
TABLE C
VILLABE OF NORTH PALM BEACN
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USIND
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway CTY. RD. AIA. Date: 2124/92
Direction: FAST & WEST BOLND Time: 12s30PM
I I I I II I I IISum of (Sum of I II I
I I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by (Length bylArterlalllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBDLIJD IBOLND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
I 1(mi.> ICIASS I(mph)II(sec) ((sec) 1
1 I 1=11 I I= II(sec) a I (mi.) I(mph> b IISec. c I
l (PGA - Lost Tree
I .751 I 135
II 82.61 83.01 II I I II I
II 82.81 .751 32.611 8 I
2 IPCA -Lost Tree I 2.251 1 145 II 174.71 182.11 II 176.41 2.251 45.411 A I
II
Roadway CTY. RD. AtA.
Direction: EAST k WEST BDUJD
Overall Facility LOS 261.2 3.00 41.3
Date: 2/21/92
Time: 5:30PM
I I I I II I I IISum of (Sum of I II I
I I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by (length bylArterialtlArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND 1601ND 1 IlSectton (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
I I(mi.) (CLASS I(mph)11(uc> I(sec> I
I I 1=II I 11<sec) a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c I
--
1 (PGA - Lost Tree
1 .751 1 135 1=
II 96.71 82.31 11~
I I II 1
II 69.51 .751 30.211 B I
2 (PGA - Lost Tree I 2.251 I 1 45 II 192.01 181.61 II 186.81 2.251 43.411 A I
11
Roadway CTY. RD. AIA.
Direction: FAST & WEST BOLND
Overall Facility LDS 276.2 3.00 39.1
Dates 2/24/92
Times 4:30PM
1 I I I II I I IISum of (Sum of 1 II I
I I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOLND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) (CLASS
1 I I ((mph>II<sec) ((sec) I
1=1I
C II(sec> a I (mi.) 1(mph) b IISec. c I
1 (PGA -Lost Tre¢ I .751 1
1 35 I
I=
II 93.21 64.21 1I I 1 i t 1
II 68.71 .751 30'.4116 i
2 (Lost Tree-St.Pk.l 2.251 1 145 II 198.81 179.01 II 188.91 2.251 92.911A I
II
Overall Facility LOS 277.6 3.00 38.9 A
' a. Average travel time of both directions during the time periods indicated.
b. Calculated by (36D0)(Sum of Length>/(Sum of Time)
c. LOS taken fran 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 11-1, arterial class 1.
Source: 1965 Highway Capaciiy Manual, Chapter 11.
4-96
ATTACIMIM 4-1
TABLE D
VILLAGE Of NORTH PALM BEACH '
COMPUTATIDN OF ARTERIAL LEVEL Of SERVICE WDRKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD.
Roadway PROSPERITY fATd1S ROAD Date: !/17/92
Direction: NORTH k SOl1TH BOItJD Times 10:2i1fsM
I I I I II I i (ISum of ISum of I II 1
I I I (FREE IINORTH ISDIRH I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBDLND IBDLND I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
1 I(mi.) (CLASS
1 1 ((mph>II(sec> ((sec) I
1=II 1 I II(sec> a 1 (mi.> ((mph) b IISec. c I
1 (PGA - Burns Rd
1 .881 1
140 =
II 62.01 BD.DI II 1 I II I
II 61.01 .881 39.111 A I
2 (Burns-Lihse DR I .991 1 13D II 108.01 120.01 II 114.01 .991 31.311 B I
3 ILthse-N.Ik Blvd I .651 I 1 40 II 70.D1 77.21 II 73.61 ,651 31.611 B 1
II
Overall facility LOS ' 266.6 2.52 33.8 B
Roadway PROSPERITY (ARMS ROAD
Direction: NORTH & SOUTH BDLND
Dates 2121/92
Time: 9:SOAM
I I I I 11 I I (ISum of ISum of I II I
I I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTER1ALIfLOW IIBDLND IB01l1JD I (!Section (Section (Speed IILOS By 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTiCN
I I(mi.> (CLASS
I 1 I(mph)11(sec) 1(sec) I
I=I I~~I 1 II(sec) a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c I
=
I
1 (PGA - Burns Rd
I .BBI I
14D
II 85.31 78.91 1
I I I I I
II 82.11 .881 38.611 A I
2 (Burns-Lthse DR I .991 1 130 II 120.71 113.21 II I1S.91 .991 30.511 B i
3 Ilthse-N.lk Blvd 1 .651 1 140 II 74.91 88.91 II 81.91 .651 28.611 B I
III
Overall Facility LOS 28D.9 2.52 32.3
Roadway PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD
Direction: NORTH & SOUTH BOLND
Date: 2/2!/92
Time: I:SOPM
I I 1 I' it 1 I (ISum of ISum of 1 II I
I I I .(FREE IIEAST (WEST 1 IlTime by (Length bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOIND IBOIRJD I (!Section (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
1=-=
~ 1<mi.) ICtASS
I I I(mph)II(sec) ((sec) I
1=11 I 1 11(sec) a l (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c l
11
-
1 (PGA - Burns Rd
1 .681 I =
140 II 76.31 85.91 I 1 II I
II Bl.ll .881 39.111 A I
2 (Burns-Lihse DR I .991 I 130 II 114.71 109.51 II 112.11 .991 31.811 B I
3 ILthse-N.lk Blvd I .651 I 14D II 84.61 77.91 II 81.21 .651 26.811 B I
II
Overall facility LOS 274.4 2.52 33.1 B
a. Average travel time of both directions during the time periods indicated. '
b. Calculated by (36D0)(Sum of Length)/(Sum of Time>.
c. LDS taken from 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 1l-t, arterial class I.
Source: 1985 Highway Capatity Manual, Chapter 11.
9-97
ATTACHMENT 4-1
TABLE D
' VILLAGE DF NORTH PALM BEACH
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL DF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD
Direction: NORTH & SOUTH BDIAJD
Date: 2/24/92
Time: 12:SOPM
I 1 I I. II I 1 (ISum of ISum of 1 II 1
I I I (FREE IINORTH (SOUTH I IlTime by ILengtA bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENDTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOIND IBOl1ND 1 IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION
I I(mi J (CLASS
I=I t(mph)11(seD ((sec) 1
1=1I I II(sec) a i (mi J ((mph) b IISec. c l
1 (PGA - Burns Rd
I .BBL I
140 1=
II 8D.41 79.41 1I I I 11 I
II 79.91 .681 39.611 A I
2 (Burns-Lthse DR I .991 I 130 II 104.11 108.71 II 106.41 .991 33.511 B I
3 Ilthse~f.lk Blvd 1 .651 1 1 40 II 71.11 72.51 II 71.81 .651 32.611 B I
II ~~
Overall facility LOS 258.1 2.52 35.1
Roadway PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD Date: ?/21/92
Direction: NORTH & SOIfTH BDLND Time: 4:SOPM
' 1 I I 1 II I I (ISum of ISum of I II 1
I 1 I (FREE IINORTH (SOUTH I IlTime by (length bylArterialllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOIIND IBOItfD I IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) IClASS ((mph>11(sec) I<sec) I II(sec) a I (mi.> ((mph) b IISec. c i
I I I I=11 I I=II ,I 1 II I
1 (PGA - Burns Rd I .BBL I~ 1 4D II 79.41 79.41 11 79.41 .881 39.911 A 1
2 (Burns-Lthse DR I .991 I 13D II 101.61 98.81 II 100.21 .991 35.d11 A I
3 Ilthse~l.lk Blvd I .651 I 140 II 74.91 71.51 II 73.21 .651 32.011 B I
II
Overall Facility LOS 252.6 2.52 35.9 A
Roadway PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD
Direction: NORTH & SOUTH BOIRfD
1
Date: 2/24/92
Time: 4:30PM
I 1 I I~ II I I (ISum of ISum of I 11 I
1 I I (FREE IINORTH ISDUTH I IlTime by (Length bylArterialllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTNIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOIRJD IBOI~iI) I IlStction (Section (Speed IILDS By I
SECTIDNIDESCR[PTION
1 I(mi.) (CLASS
I
I 1(mph)11(sec) ((sec) 1
1=11 II(sec) a I (mi.) I(mph)'b IISec. c T
1 (PGA - Burns Rd --
I .881 I i 1=
1 40 II 79.91 79.31 11 I I II I
II 79.61 .661 39.811 A I
2 IBurns-Lthse DR 1 .991 1 1 30 II 104.61 101.81 II 103.21 .991 34.511 B I
3 ILfhse-N.ik Blvd
- I .d51 I 1,40 II 77.71 72.91. II 75.31 .651 31.111 A I
II
Overall Facility LOS 258.1 2.52 35.1 A
a. Average travel time of both directions during the time periods indicated.
b. Calculated by (3600)<Sum of Length>/(Sum of Time)
c. LDS taken from 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table 11-1, arterial class 1.
Source: 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
9-98
ATTACHMENT 4-1
TABLE E '
VILLAGE OF NORTH PAIN BEACH
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-DAR METI~D
Roadway f LIGHTHOUSE DR. Date: 1/17/92
Dirrciion: FAST k HEST BOIND Tinet 10:50AM
1 I I I II 1 1 IISun of (Sun of I II I
I I I (FREE IIFAST WEST I IITiaK by ILengih bylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLg1 IIBOIIND IBDl1(D I IlSrction ISectfoa ISpred IILOS By 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION 1(ni.> (CLASS I(nph)11(sec) i(sec) I II<sec> a 1 <ni.> 1(nph) b IISec. c I
I I I ICI I~1~1~1 I I®I~I 1 I
1 IU.S.1-Prosperity) 1.001 I 125 it 130.01 127.71 II 128.81 1.001 28.D11 A 1
2 IPrsplY-A1t.A1A I .661 1 125 II 9D.01 94.31 II 92.21 .661 25.811 A I
II ~~
Werall FacilltY LOS 221 .D 1.66 27.0 A
Roadway LIGHTHOUSE DR.
Direction: EAST & WEST BOIRA
Date: 2/21/92
Tine: IO:iDAM
I I I I II I i IISua of ISuw of I II
1 I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTine by Ileagth bYlArteria111Arterial
ISELTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOWD 1 ()Section (Section (Speed IILOS~By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION 1(ni.> (CLASS I(nph)11(sec) i(sec> 1 11(sec) a I (nl.) 1(nph) b IIScc. c I
~I~I~I Ici I~1 111 I~1~1I I
1 IU.S.i-Prosperity) 1.001 I 1 25 II 135.41 135.81 11 135.61 1.001 26.511 A I
2 IPrsptY-AIt.A1A 1 .661 1 125 II 102.51 49.11 II 100.61 .661 23.611 B I
II
Overall Facility LOS 236.4 1.66 25.3 A
Roadway LIGHTHOUSE DR.
Direction: EAST k WEST BOLtA
Date: 2/21/92
Tines 2:40PM
I 1 I I it 1 1 IISum of (Sun of I II I
I I 1 (FREE IIEAST IWESi 1 IlTine by (Length bylArterla111Arteriall
ISECf10N ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLCW IIBDLND IBOt1ND 1 IlSection (Section (Speed IILOS BY 1
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION 1(ni.) (CLASS I<nph)II(sec) t(eat) I II(sec) a l (ni.> 1(nph> 6 IISec. c i
=~1 I 1 I~1I~i®I~1I~I ICI I I
1 IU.S.t-Prosperity) 1.001 I ( 25 II 141.81 144.11 II 142.91 1.001 25.211 A I
2 IPrsptY-A1t.AfA I .661 1 125 II 136.71 143.91 II 140.31 .661 16.911 C I
II
Overall Facility LOS 263.2 1.66 21.1 B
a. Average travel tine o4 both directions during the
b. Calculated by (360D)(Snm of Length>/(Sun of Time).
c. LDS taken from 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Table
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter ll.
tine periods indicated.
11-1, arterial class II1, due to 25 nph speed )init.
4-99
ATTACNIFNT 4-1
' TABLE E
VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BFACH
COMPUTATION OF ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET
USING
TEST-CAR METHOD
Roadway LIGHTHOUSE DR. Date: 2/24/92
Direction: EAST & WEST BOU4D Times 12:15PM
I I I I II 1 I IISum of (Sum of 1 II I
I I I (FREE IIEAST iWEST I IlTime by (Length bylArterialllArteriall
(SECTION ILENGTNIARTER[ALIFLOW IIBDIRd) IBDLND I (!Section (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SEC710NIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) (CLASS
I 1=1 ((mph>II(sec) 1(sec) 1
1~1 I I I II(sec) a I (mi.) ((mph) b IISec. c I
I
1 IU.S.1-Prosperityl 1.001 I
1 25 =
II 146.81 150.41 I I I I I I
II 140.61 1.001 24.211 B I
2 IPrsptY-Alt.AtA 1 .661 I 125 II 121.61 126.61 II 124.21 .661 19.111 B I
II
Overall Facility LOS 272.6 1.66 21.9
Roadway LIGHTHOUSE DR.
Direction: EAST k WEST BOUND
Date: 2/21/92
Time: S:ISPM
I I I I 11 I I IISum of (Sum of 1 II 1
I 1 I IF.REE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by (Length 6ylArteria111Arteriall
(SECTION ILENGTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLND IBOLND I IlSettion (Section (Speed IILOS By I
SECTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi J (CLASS
I 1=1 ((mph>II<sec> ((sec) I
1 =11 II(sec> a I (mi.) I(mph> b IISec. c I
1 IU.S.I-Prosperityl 1.001 I I 1=
125 II 133.11 170.01 11 I I II I
it 151.61 1.001 23.811 B I
2 IPrspty-A1t.A1A I .661 1 125 II 143.21 102.81 II 123.01 .661 19.311 B I
II
Overall Facility LOS 274.5 1.66 21.6
Roadway LIGHTHDUSE DR.
Direction: EAST & WEST BOLND
Date: 2/24/92
Time: S:SOPM
I I I 1' II 1 I IISum of (Sum of I II 1
I I I (FREE IIEAST (WEST I IlTime by (Length bylArterialllArteriall
(SECTION ILENOTHIARTERIALIFLOW IIBOLtfD IBOLND I (!Section (Section (Speed IILOS By 1
SELTIONIDESCRIPTION I(mi.) (CLASS
I 1=1 I(mph)II(sec) I(sec> I
1=11 I 1 11(seQ a I (mi J 1(mph) b IISec. c I
=1 I I
I I I
I IU.S.1-Prosperityl 1.001 I 125 it 141.81 149.01 I
II 145.41 1.001 24.811 B I
2 IPrspty-Alt.A1A I .661 I 125 II 136.71 139.51 II 138.!1 .661 17.211 C I
II
Overall Facility LOS ZB's.5 1.66 21.1 O
' a. Average travel time of both directions during the time periods indicated.
b. Calculated by (3600)<Sum of length)/(Sum of Time)
c. LOS taKen from 1965 Highway Capacity Manual, Table I1-1, arterial class III, due to 25 mph speed limit.
Source: 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 11.
4-50