Loading...
1993-01 Adopting Comp Plan Amendment 92-1ORDINANCE NO. 1-93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AMENDMENT 92-1 TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ACT, AS AMENDED, BEING SECTIONS 163.3161 ET. SEQ., FLORIDA STATUTES; ATTACHING AS EXHIBIT "A" A COPY OF THE AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING A CONFLICTS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Act, the Village of North Palm Beach is required to adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, on 7 July 1992, the Village Planning Commission, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, held a Public Hearing to review amendment 92-1 and on 7 July 1992 at its regular meeting, made a recommendation to the Village Council to approve amendment 92-1; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Planning and Land Development Act, Section 163.161 et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida, hereby adopts amendment 92-1 to the Comprehensive Plan of the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida. A copy of amendment 92-1 is attached hereto and ' made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". cpordall _ 1 _ Section 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed. ' Section 3: Should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not effect the remainder of this ordinance. Section 4: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. PLACED ON PUBLIC HEARING THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992 PLACED ON'FIRST READING THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 1992 PLACED ON PUBLIC HEARING THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1993 PLACED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1993 1 M OR ATTEST: ' Village Clerk ~, cpordall - 2 _ VILLAGF. OF NORTlI PAi,M llEACIi FLORIDA PROPOSED COMPREiIENSIVE PLAN AMiiNDMENTS FIRST APPI,ICATZONS FOR TILE YEAR 1992 (92-1) December, 1991 1 Prepared for: The Village of 1JOrth Palm Tieac*i I'repare>d l.y: Land Research Ptanagertuunt, Inc. REV. FCE3 25, 1993 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS S1:CTION PAGE ' 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1-1 2.0 ANALYSES OF MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS .................... 2-1 2.1 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.1,,,,, 2_2 2.2 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.2..... 2_3 2.3 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.3..... 2-9 2.4 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.4..... 2-5 2.5 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.SA.... 2-6 2.6 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.5B.... 2-7 2.7 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.6..... 2-8 2.8 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.7..... 2-9 2.9 Analysis of Land Use Map and Text Amendment 92-1.8••••• 2-10 3.0 ANALYSIS OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.. 3-1 3:1 Village Character ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::: 3_2 3.2 Future Land Use 3-3 3.3 Traffic Circulation ••••••••• .......................... 3-22 3.9 housing ............................................... 3-37 3.5 Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge ••••.... 3-41 3.6 Coastal Management••••• ................... 3-51 3.7 Conservation .......................................... 3-53 3.8 Recreation and Open Space ............................. 3-54 3.9 Intergovernmental Coordination ........................ 3-57 3.10 Capital Improvements,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,_,,,,_••••__, 3-58 9.0 CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAh AND STATF. PLANS .............. 9-1 4.1 Regional Plan Consistency ............................. 4-1 ' 4.2 State Plan Consistency ...::........................... 4-1 APPENDIX - AMENDMENT NPBCP 92-1 .. ........................... B-] LIST OF FIGURES f'AG E ' }~IGURE 1 COMPRE}fENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 91-1•••••••• ..........::.. 1-2 FIGURE 2 EFFECT OF 91-1 AMENDMENTS ON VILLAGE PLANNING AREAS •. 3-11 FIGURF, 3 EXISTING LAND USE MAP - PLANNING AREA 2 ..............~.. 3-12 FIGURE 4 EXISTING LAND USE MAP - PLANNING AREA 6A ............... 3-13 FIGURE 5 EXISTING LAND USE MAP - PLANNING AREA 7 ................ 3-14 FIGURE 6 AMENDMENT 92-1 DAILY TRAFFIC (1994) .................... 3-27 FIGURE 7 AMENDMENT 92-1 DAILY TRAFFIC (PROJ. $UILDOUT - 1998)... 3-28 FIGURE 8 FUTURE ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1999) ............. 3-29 U 1.0 INTRODUCTION ' The Village of North Palm Beach is currently considering the adoption of eight Future Land Use Plan Amendme~its. This document provides data and analysis required by Sections 9J-S and 9J-11.006(1)(b) 1.-5., Florida Administrative Code, relative to those amendments. Five of the eight proposed amendments are the result of annexation actions undertaken by the Village during 1991. The three remaining applications are the results of petitions for Future Land Use Plan changes to accommodate specific development objectives.. The eight proposed amendments are shown on FIGURE 1 and summarized in TABLE 1. Section 2.0 consists of brief summaries and analyses of each proposed amendment in terms of the requirements of Section 9J-11.006(1)(b) 1- 5., F.A.C. Section 3.0 comprises an analysis of the cumulative impacts of the ' proposed amendments in terms of each Element of the current North Palm Bea ch SupPOrt Documentation and Comprehensive Plan. Section 9.0 contains an assessment of the proposed amendments to regional and state comprehensive plans. 'I'}~e Appendix of this document contains each of the proposed amendments. 1 1-1 1 II _ U .~ 1 1 Q W Q7 7 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a Q i O 1 d W ~ a N .~ S ~ ~ ~ H E, ul N s~ c Y •.i E w a ] p Z 2 z w w~ ~ ~ E ' •.. v a Ul LL p Q a ~ ' 6 W OCEAN C Q. a < , ~ ~ z Q a~~ANt~c ~~~ ~ v J o U . . ~ -. ~~\ -' ~ .--I ~ .i N ~ ._ ~k .J' Y J C N~ E v v E y a m~ ~ _/ P~~ ,~O `'.FE ! } k3 t ~ ~_~~ i ~- f 9'1~ 1y1 ~i. 1.1~ 1 ~~ ~~y,'~t ~j/;; ': N ' ' ' ` ~ ~ M d' N .i / 1 ~ ~ N ~ N ~ N N ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~k rn / Ak Y ~ ~~ Y Y - ~ q w C ~ C ~ G ~ ~ E ~ " U1 E •C ro v v ~ ~ ~ ~ c W ~ N a UI ~ J V E ~ d E ~ .E¢ a ~ , ~ ~ v .c E ~ p, b ro ro ~ro ~ ro ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ l~ ]-2 ~ N a. Q S. P m F % 41 >: a % w 7: Q n. Z F w a w R E+ w w w w z a z ~- ~- z .~ Y Y H Y H m H 1 ro a m % 1 a a 2 zl G a of ^ •-I c E+I ~ ~n F QI U V x U U U a zl ro m x ro a ~ ro w ro H w of a w a w a w a a u a .,I ~ .~ z ~ ~. ~. m w NI ~ -- a w J WI N f~l ~() N V1 V' N V wI I 1 a a a a I I I r a w w' a a a a a a p. H bl U C -N m a a a a a a ro v a a a a a v v a ++ N e~ a o 0 0 0 o a a o 0 % NI a .+ .y .+ ~.+ .+ a a .+ +~ ., w 51 o a a a a a o o a a QI a a a a a a a a a a c ~ FI > ro v v v a > > ~ a -.. U tnI a C G G C C a a C Ei ti a a a a 5 ~ a W ~ a ro ^I c +' vl1 a o kll E +~ w [a I N P W M 10 O Ul N M N Q roof _ H !LI ~ M O~ Ul f'1 I(1 ~O N o r a >+ vl ~-I rl m N .-+ ~o m m .-I -+ ~ C O .c .c a Y +~ Vi Y H 7 p C O O .C a 7_ m a U v E bl H C 'O N H ro 7 m C 0 0 -+ .c a a A A .I U E H a H -rl a ry m >v > m > G >v H x m o x x m +~ o w o I x >. >. ro - H a o 5i >. ~~ I ro +~ a. >. +> w a ro P. w +~ x E.I o -.. H H -.+ ro +> o a a u P: QI H m m H a E •~ H 'O N a ro o %I a a ~ ~ a IT H c a a ^ a o a o I > GL +' Y P. ro a p Q m V W N I a O C G O .-I m +~ m O C G X. E r1 WI 3 H ro m H -.i •.i Iq a F O m U ~-I +> a n. ro v w x >+ .c a a E +~ •I N N G +~ ti H w %I •-+ N rt V' vl t!7 lD r W Q W P. a I cJ .I .~ f. .-. .-, .-~ .. .. .. .. .-~ N U' wI I I I I I I I I 1 U w FI WI N N N N N N N N N Rl P~ c•. wl rn rn rn o, m m rn rn rn w z 1-3 1 1 2.0 ANALYSIS OF MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS ' This Section provides data summaries and brief analyses of each of the proposed 92-1 Amendments, pursuant to the requirements of Section 9J-11.006 (1) (b) 1 - 5, Florida Administrative Code, including: 1. the proposed Future Land Use Map Designation, the boundary of the subject property, and its location in relation to surrounding street and thoroughfare network; 2. the present Land Use Designation of the subject property and abutting properties; 3. the size of the subject property in acres; 9. a description of the availability of and demand on the following public facilities: sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable ' water, traffic circulation and recreation, as appropriate; and 5. information regarding the compatibility of the proposed Land Use Amendments with Future Land Use Element objectives and policies. This Section contains brief individual descriptions and analyses of each proposed Amendment in terms of the above criteria. Reference to other related sections of this document is provided, as necessary. r 2-1 2.1 ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT N0. 92-1.1 A. NAME OR DESIGNATION: Twelve Oaks B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Existing 31.2-acre residential ' project located south of PGA Boulevard, between U.S. Highway 1 and bake Worth (Ref: FIGURE 1). Annexed by Village Ordinance 2-91. C. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATION: - Existing single-family and multi-family residential project approved as a PUD. Proposed RH Future Land Use Designation and R-3 Zoning Designation. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction Existing Land Use North Palm Beach Gardens State Road A-1-A South North Palm Beach Relig:~ous Monastery East Palm Beach County Lake Worth (water body) West Palm Beach Gardens Professional Office North Palm Beach Commercial Retail Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 3. , E. SUBJECT PROPERTY LAND USES: 1. Development Concept: Retain current development status of 197 dwelling units (s;Ingle-family and multi-family mix) 2. Population Projections: 1999 - 476; 1999 - 476; buildout - 476 F'. LAND USE SUITABILITY: NA - Property presently developed G. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.5A 4. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.SC 5. Solid Waste: Ref: Section 3.SB 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 fl. COMPATIBILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ' 'Phe proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0. 2-2 2.2. ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MA'..' AMENDMENT NO. 92-1.2 1 A. NAME OR DESIGNATION: Prosperity }Iarbor North B. PARCEL DES!'RIPTION AND LOCAa'ION: Vacant 33.9-acre parcel located north of RCA Boulevard extended, between Prosperity Farms Road and the Intracoastal Waterway (Ref: FIGURE 1). Annexed by Village Ordinance 27-91. C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Prop:~sed RL Future Land Use Designation with R-1 Zoning District with Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval. P. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction North Palm Beach County South Palm Beach County North Palm Beach East Palm Beach County West Palm Beach Gardens Existing Land Use Residential F.I.N.D. Tract (vacant) Commercial PUD. (mixed use) Intracoastal Waterway Professional Office Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 9. F.. SUBJECT ~'ROPERTY LAND USES: 1. Development Concept: Proposed 98 single-family waterfront lots with an 8.64-acre internal canal system. 2. Population Projections: 1999 - 141; 1999 - 255; buildout 255 F. 1,A ND US F. SUITABILITY: Ref: Section 3.2 G. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.3D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.5A 4. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.5C 5. Solid Watte: Ref: Section 3.5B 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 1 H. COMPATIBILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVF. PLAN: 7`he proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0 2-3 "1..3 ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT NO. 92-1.3 A. NAME OR DESIGNATION: Sanctuary Bay B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Vacant 29.8 acre parcel located ' south of RCA Boulevard extended, between Prosperity Farms Road and the Intracoastal Waterway (Ref: FIGURE 1). C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Propose RM Future Land Use Designation with R-2 Zoning District with Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction North North Palm Beach South North Palm Beach East Palm Beach County West Palm Beach Gardens Exi_stinq Land Use RCA Boulevard extended Vacant and Proposed R-3 PUD Intracoastal Waterway Prosperity Farms Road Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 4. E?. SUBJECT PROPERTY LAND USE: 1. Development Concept: Proposed 232 multi-family units with 13.5- acre mangrove preserve, 18 boat slips and private recreation area. , 2. Population Projections: 1999 - 90; 1999 - 439;,buildout - 434 F. LAND USE SUITABILITY: Ref: Section 3.2 G. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.SA 4. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.SC 5. Solid Waste: Ref: Section 3.5B 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 fI.- COMPATIBILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0 ' 2-4 2.9 ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT N0. 92-1.9 A. NAME OR llESIGNATION: Sanctuary Cove ' B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION : Vacant 15.3 acre parcel located east of Prosperity Farms Road, south of RCA Boulevard extended (Ref: FIGURE 1). C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DE SIGNATION S: Proposed RII Future Land Use Designation with R-3 Zoning District with Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction Existin g Land Use North North Palm Beach Vacant, Proposed R-2 PUD South North Palm Beach Village Community Center East North Palm Beach Vacant, Proposed R-1 PUD :Jest Palm Beach County Prosper ity Farms Road Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 9. F.. SUBJECT PROPERTY LAND USE: ' 1. Development Concept: Proposed 189 multi-family unit project with a 0.76-acre private recreation area. 2. Population Projections: ]999 - 236; 1999 - 302; buildout - 302 F. LAND US F, SUITABILITY: Ref: Section 3.2 G. 1NFRASTRUCTURF. IMPACTS: I. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: }tef: Section 3.5A 9. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.5C 5. Solid Waste: Ref: Section 3.5B 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 H. COMPATIBILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0. 2-5 2.5 ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT 92-1.SA A. NAME OR DESIGNATION: Prosperity Harbor South B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Vacant 63.5-acre parcel located along the North Palm Beach Waterway, east of Burns Road extended (Ref: FIGURE 1). C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Proposed RL Future Land Use Designation and R-1 Zoning District with Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction North North Palm Beach South North Palm Beach East North Palm Beach West North Palm Beach Existing Land Use Vacant Proposed R-2 PUD Prosperity Harbor (water body) and 3.82-acre neighborhood park North Palm Beach Waterway Vacant, Proposed R-3 PUD, Community Center and Prosperity Farms Road Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 9. E. SUBJECT PROPERTY LAND USES: 1. Development Concept: Proposed 108 single-family waterfront development with a 16.75-acre internal canal system and private recreation area. 2. Population Projections: 1999 - 137; 1999 - 359; buildout - 359 F. LAND-USE SUITABILITY: Ref: Section 3.2 G. INFRASTRUC'T'URE IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.5A 9. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.5C 5. Solid Waste: Ref: Section 3.5B 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.B H. COMPATIBILIT]' WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0. 1 7.-6 2.6 ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMF,NDMENT ' A. NAME OR DESIGNATION: Village Park B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Vacant 5.0-acre parcel located east of Prosperity Farms Road and west of Prosperity Harbour (Ref: FIGURE 1). Includes 1.18 acre drainage easement. C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Proposed R/OS Future Land Use Designation with P Zoning District. D. ABUT'T'ING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction Existing Land Use North North Palm Beach Vacant Proposed R-1 PUD South North Palm Beach Residential East North Palm Beach Prosperity Harbour West North Palm Beach Prosperity Farms Road Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 9 of this document and FIGURES 3-19 and 3-20 of the 1989 Support Documentation. ' E. SUBJECT PROPERTY LAND USES: 1. Development Concept: Develop a 3.17-acre passive neighborhood and a 0.65-acre°public access strip from. Prosperity Farms Road to Prosperity Harbour. 2. Population Projections: NA F. LAND USE SUITABILITY: Ref: Section 3.2 G. INFRASTRUCTURE. IMPACTS: I. Traffic Circulation: Insignificant Impact 2. Potable Water: NA 3. Wastewater: NA 9. Drainage: NA 5. Solid Waste: NA 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 ' }I. COMPATIBILITY WIT}} COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail. is presented in Chapter 3.0. 2-7 2.7. ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT N0. 92-1.6 A. NAM F. OR DESIGNATION: Fisherman's Village B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Existing 6.5-acre platted sub- , division located along Robalo Court, west of Prosperity Farms Road (Ref: FIGURE 1). C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Proposed RM Future Land Use Plan designation and R-2 Zoning District. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction North North Palm Beach South Palm Beach County East North Palm Beach West North Palm Beach Existing Land Use Residential Earmap River (C-17 Canal) Church and Public Building Residential Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 5. I?. SUBJECT PROPERT LAND USES: 1. Development Concept: Retain current development status of 29 duplex units (98 total units). 2. Population Projections:1999 - 125; 1999 - 125; Buildout - 125 F. LAND USE SUITABILITY: NA - property presently developed G. INFRASTRUCTURF, IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.5A 4. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.5C 5. Solid Waste: Ref: Section 3.SB 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 F1. COMPATIBILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed amendment is deemed consistent with the current Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0. 1 2-8 l.£3 ANALYSIS OF LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT N0. 92-1.7 ' A. NAME OR DESIGNATION: First Unitarian Church B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Existing 2.59-acre church located west of Prosperity Farms Road, north of C-17 Canal (Ref: FIGURE 1). C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Proposed OPF Future Land Use Designation and R-2 Zoning District. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction Existing Land Use North North Palm Beach Public Building South North Palm Beach Earman River (C-17 Canal) East North Palm Beach Prosperity Farms Road West North Palm Beach Residential E. SUBJECT PROPERTY LAND USES: 1. Development Concept: NA - Existing church ' 2. Population Projections: NA F. LAND USE SUITABILITY: NA - property presently developed G. INFRASTRUCTUR~i IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 ?. Potable Water: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.SA 9. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.5C 5. Solis Waste: Ref: Section 3.5B 6. Recreation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.II H. COMPA'I'7BILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed a;nendment is 'eemed compatible with the current -Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail. is presented in Chapter 3.0. 2-9 2.9 ANALYSIS OF LAND US@: MAP .AMENDMENT NO. 92-1.8 A. NAMIi OR DESIGNATION: Dean Property (Tract 311) B. PARCEL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Vacant 0.3-acre parcel located ' between the C-17 Canal and Laurel Court (Ref: FIGURE 1). C. PROPOSED LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS: Proposed RL Future Land Use Plan Designation and R-1 Zoning District. D. ABUTTING LAND USE SUMMARY: Location Jurisdiction Existing Land North North Palm Beach Residential South North Palm Beach Earman River (C-17 Canal) East North Palm Beach Residential West North Palm Beach Earman River (C-17 Canal) Future Land Use Plan and zoning designations of abutting properties are illustrated on FIGURE 5. F,. SUAJECT PROPERTY LAND USES: 1. llevelopment Concept: Proposed single-family residence ' 2. Population Projections: 1999 - 3; 1999 - 3; buildout - 3 I'. LAND USE SUITABILITY: Ref: Section 3.2 G. INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS: 1. Traffic Circulation: Ref: Section 3.3 2. Potable W:iter: Ref: Section 3.5D 3. Wastewater: Ref: Section 3.5A 9. Drainage: Ref: Section 3.5C 5. Solid Waste: Ref: Section 3.5B 6. I2ecrcation/Open Space: Ref: Section 3.8 II. COMPATIBILITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The proposed amendment is deemed compatible with the current "Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further detail is presented in Chapter 3.0. 1 2-10 ' 3.0 ANALYSIS OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS This Section provide=: data summaries and brief analyses of each of the proposed 92-1 Amendments, pursuant to the requirements of Section 9J-11.006 (1) (b) 1 - 5, Florida Administrative Code, which states: "All plan amendments must meet the requirements of Section 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code:' 1'he sub-sections that follow represent an element-by-element review of the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation and Comprehensive Plan in terms of the proposed 92-1 Amendments. Appro- priate revisions to each are recommended herein, based on an assess- ment of the cumulative impacts of proposed 92-1 Amendments. Actual Comprehensive Plan Amendments resulting from this assessment are presented in the APPENDIX of this document. 1 3-1 3.1 VILLAGE CHARACTER The eight proposed Future Land Use Plan Amendments constitute a por- ' tion of the first 1992 calendar-year revisions to the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. The Amendments consist of recent annexations and Land Use Map revisions to previously undeveloped land in the Village. The 186 acres represented by the proposed Amendments constitute a total buildout of 868 residential units (single-family and multiple-family), a proposed neighborhood park and a church. Residential ensities on four of the vacant parcels (Prosperity harbor North and South, Sanctuary Cove and Sanctuary Bay) have been limited b,+ their respective Planned Unit Development (PUD) approvals, which are contingent upon approval of each related Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The population potential associated with all eight Amend- ments is estimated to be 1,949 residents. All of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments analyzed herein are located along the Prosperity Farms Road corridor, with the exception ' of Twelve Oaks. Four amendments represent waterfront residential projects (Prosperity Harbor North and South, Sanctuary Bay and Twelve Oaks) oriented to utilizing the inland waterways of the Village. These developments are consistent with the water-oriented character of development along the western shores of the North Palm Beach Waterway and Lake Worth. Fisherman's Village,- an existing subdivision consisting of 24 duplex units, the Dean Property, a 0.3-acre vacant residential lot and the First Unitarian Church property are located in the southwest portion of the Village and represented an unincorporated enclave prior to annexation. 3-2 1 1 ~J 3.2 FUTURE LAND USE A. DATA SUMMARY An analysis of topography, soils and minerals, flooding, and native vegetation in the Village is presented in the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation. This document provides an analysis of the above characteristics for areas included in proposed Amend- ments 92-1.3, 92-1.9 and 92-1.5. Amendments 92-1.1, 92-1.2, 92-1.6 and 92-1.8 are the result of Village annexation actions and require additional analyses not contained in the 1989 Support Documentation. The follo~ring data pertain to these recent annexations. 1. Topography. Approximate elevations of each property are presented on the following table: Amendment Elevation (N.G.V.D.) 92-1.1 5 to 10 feet 92-1.2 5 feet 92-1.6 5 to 10 feet 92--1.7 5 to 10 feet 97.-1.8 5 to 10 feet 2. Soils and Minerals. General soil types for each property are presented on the following table: Amendment Soil Type 92.-1.1 St. Lucie Urban Com plex 92-1.2 Arents -- Urban Land Complex 92-1.6 Basinger-Urban Land Complex 92-1.7 Basinger.-Urban Land Complex ~92-1.8 Basinger-Urban Land Complex Status Developed Vacant Developed Developed Vacant 3-3 According to the Soil Survey of Palm Beach County, Florida (1978), prepared by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Con- ' serv.at~on Service, urban land areas are generally altered to such an extent that the former soils cannot be easily recognized. On this basis, it is concluded that available soils data cannot be use$ to assess the soils limitations of proposed amendments 92-1.1, 92-1.6 and 92-1.7. ' The Soil Survey of Palm Beach County, Florida describes the Arents- Urban Land Complex as consisting of "...golf courses, subdivisions, condominium developments, roadways, businesses or industrial areas, reclaimed borrow pits and other areas filled over but not yet developed." Moderate limitations to residential development due to :~etness appear to be the only potential soil limitation. 7'he Soil Survey describes Basinger-Urban Land Complex as being "made up of nearly level, poorly drained soils that have been modified in most places by spreading about 15 inches of fill material on the ' original surface." Due to the modified nature of this soil, no limit- ations rating has been defined. Based on the analysis completed in the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation and the supplemental analyses presented above, soils do not appear to be limiting factors in the development of the vacant properties included in the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. Further, no known mineral resources are located on any of t}ie properties that are subjects of the 92-1 Comprehensive Plan amendements. 3. Flooding Potential. Flood zone designations for each property are presented on the following table: 1 3-9 ' Amendment Flood Zone Flood Hazard 92-1.7 A7/B/C Severe/Moderate/Minimal 92-1.2 A5 Severe 92-1.6 B Moderate 92-1.7 B Moderate 92-1.8 B Moderate The base flood elevation in the A5 and A7 zones is 7 feet, 9 inches; however, Village Land Development Regulations require a first-floor elevation of 8.5 feet, thus providing additional. protection in terms of base flooding. An analysis of the flood hazards is contained in the ]989 Support Documentation. 9. Native Vegetation. Proposed Coml 92-1.6 and 92-1.7 are currently de' native vegetation is not required. ' 4a:,ant,~single-family lot that has which has been included in Village only undeveloped, annexed property relevant. ~rehensive Plan Amendments 92-1.1, reloped; therefore, an analysis of Proposed Amendment 92-1.8 is a been cleared. Amendment 92-1.2, Planning Area 6A, represents the for which vegetative analysis is A preliminary inspection of the property included in Amendment 92-1.2 indicates the presence of several native species, including live oak and mangroves; the latter inhabiting the shoreline of the North Palm Beach Waterway. The Soil Survey does not list any native vegetative species for the Agents-Urban Land Complex soil type, which charac- terizes the site. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan Use Element, which requires merit criteria. To implement vegetation preservation and ' opment Regulations. Also re includes Policy 1.5a in the Future hand the development of environmental assess- this policy, the Village adopted native removal criteria in its 1990 Land Devel- ~quired are vegetation/wildlife surveys and 3-5 written assessment of existing conditions as part of the subdivision review process. The application of these regulations to the site ' should identify the nature and extent of native species prior to development, thus allowing for preservation and protection measures to be incorporated. S. Existing Land Use Inventory. The eight proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment: include five separate parcels that have been recently annexed into the Village. The annexation actions have increased the size of the Village by 74 acres, bringing the total acreage if the Village to slightly more than 3,290 acres, or 5.19 square miles. t,IOne of the annexed properties are identified on the Florida Master Site File or National Register of Historic Places. ;he cumulative effects of the eight amendments on the Village's existing land use inventory are displayed on TABLE 2, which is a revision of TABLE 3-S (page 3-17) of the Support Documentation. In addition to the eight amendments, land development activities ' that occurred during the period of January 1, 1988 - March 31', 1991 (i.e. 12 single-family lots totaling approximately 3.0 acres) have been incorporated in TABLE 2, which currently represents a revision to the Village land use inventory. The following is a summary of the categories and revisions used to develop TABLE 2. I,ow-Density Residential land use is increased by 3 acres to reflect the 12 residential lots developed in the Village during the 1988-1991 period; Medium-Density Residential land use is increased by 36.3 acres to refl,~ct the annexation of Twelve Oaks (92-1.1) and Fisherman's Village (92-1.6), less the public right-of-way therein; 1 3-6 TABLE 2 Revised 1989 TABLE 3-5 EXISTING LAND USE - 1991 Area in Total % of Developed % of Land Use Acres Acres Area Total Area 805.03 5.9 29.5 Residential 586.19 76§=~~ ~5~ Low Densityl• 6g3T}9 (0-5.8 units/acre) 45.12 Medium Densityl• grg} (5.81-11.0 units/acre) High Density 173.72 (11.1-24.0 units/acre) 4.6 4.4 Commercial* 143.37 143.37 4r~ 4t4 Kecreation/Open Space 196.98 196.98 'HT4- ~~' 12.4 11.7 Conservation/Open Space 384.70 384.70 ~~ ~~r8- Public Buildings and 0.5 0.4 Grounds 14.08 14.08 ~~ ~~f 0.5 0.9 Educational 19.58 19.58 9TH 0~9 52.41 52.41 1.7 1.6 Other Public Facilities3' ~~ ~- ~6' .269.98 269.98 8.7 8.2 Transportation4• -fig ~~ ~' 'g~4- 1Jater 1225.10 1225.10 3~ 3-~r~-~ 3106.23 Total Devel. ~Hg'~'4B- 100.0 189.97 5.6 Vacant*5' } r } ~~ 3290.70 TOTAT, 3209r9g 100.0 *Includes parcel of land annexed to the Village in Planning Area 6A (North of Monet Road) in October, 1989. Land Use Figures reflect t}~e 1988 use of the property. 1. 12-1/9 acre lots developed since 1987. 2. Fisherman's Village and Twelve Oaks are added to total 3. First Unitarian Church is added to total. 4. Fisherman's Village R.O.W. (1.39 acres) is added to total. 5. F~rosperity Harbor North and Dean Property are added to total and ' -IZ acre o s are e uc e . SOURCE: Public Services Department, North Palm Beach, 4/1/78 JI,I3 Associates, 8/1/87, I.,RM, Inc. 2/1/88; 3/10/89; and 9/25/89x; and 10/91 to_ reflect Amendment 92-1 npbtable.3-5 3-17 3-7 Other Public Facilities land use is increased by 2.5 acres to reflect the annexation of the First Unitarian Church (92-1.7); Transportation land use is increased by 1.4 acres to reflect the public right-of-way within the Fisherman's Village (92-1.6) angex- ation; and Vacant land use is increased by 43.2 acres to reflect the Prosperity Harbor North (92-1.2) and Dean Property (92-1.8) annexations as well as an approximate 9-acre error made in the 1989 Support Documentation. The 12 single-family lots developed during the 1988-1991 period were eliminated from the Vacant Land Use category. 6. Historical Population Growth. Historical population growth in the Village during the 1960-1987 period is presented on TABLE 3-6 (page 3-23) of the 1989 Support Documentation. According to the Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida, the Village had a 1987 population of 12,782 residents. 4'he 1990 U.S. Census established the Village's population at 11,343 residents, which amounts to one less resident than the 1980 Census figure (despite the fact that 548 housing units were constructed during the 1980-1990 period.) The Village has protested the 1990 figure and has concluded that current estimates based on historical University of Florida figures are more accurate. Updated population estimates are displayed on TABLE 3, which is a revision of TABLE 3-6 of the 1989 Support Documentation. Estimates were prepared by Land Research Management, Inc. based on the applic- ation of household size rates to historical residential building permit data. The 1991 estimate includes the Fisherman's Village annexation, which has an estimated population of 125 residents and the Twelve Oaks annexation, with an estimated population of 476. 1 3-8 '~J 1 'TABLE 3 Revised 1989 TABLE 3-6 PERMANENT RESIDENT POPULATION ESTIMATES PALM BEACH NORTH •P.ALM BEACFI YEAR COUNTY TOTAL TOTAL COUNTY SHARF. (%) 19601• 238,106 2,864 1.2 19701• 348,993 9,035 2.6 19801• 576,758 11,394 2,0 19812• 615,165 11,393 1,g 19822• 637,990 12,005 1.9 19832' 652,562 12,123 l,g 19892• 682,638 12,292 1.9 19852' 713,253 12,379 1,•7 19862' 752,115 12,468 1.7 19872' 789,533 12,782 1.6 19882' 817,528 12,792 1.6 19892' 891,490 12,812 1.5 1990 863,5181' 12,8373' 1.4 1991 883,0442' 13,4943./4. 1.5 1. U.S. Bureau of the Census 2. University of Florida, Bureau of Business and Economic Research; April ls~ of each year. 3. 1990 and 1991_ estimates by Land Research Mgt Inc 9. 1991 estimate includes Fisherman's Village (125 residents and Twelve Oaks (476 residents) Annexar;.,.,~ NPBTABLE.3-6 3-23 3-9 Seasonal population estimates remain unchanged from 1986 estimates duc to the nature of residential construction and annexation during ' the 1987-1990 period (i.e. no condominiums, apartment or hotel/motel units). B. ANALYSIS 1. Delineation of North Palm Beach Planning Areas. Proposed Amend- ments 92-1.1, 92-1.2, 92-1.6, 92-1.7 and 92-1.8 affect the bound- aries of Village Planning Areas 2, 6A and 7. The cumulative effects of the above annexations on Village Planning Areas are illustrated on FIGURE 2,. which is a revision of FIGURE 3-9 (page 3-32) of the 1989 Support Documentation. 2. Existing Land Use Map Series. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amend- ments 92-1.1, 92-1.2, 92-1.6, 92-1.7 and 92-1.8 affect the Existing band Use maps in Planning Areas 2, 6A and 7. FIGURES 3, 9 and 5 are revisions to FIGURE 3-11 (page 3-36), FIGURE 3-18 (page 3-50) and FIGURF. 3-20 (page 3-59) of the 1989 Support Documentation. 3. Seasonal and Resident Population Proiections. Proposed Amendments 92-1.2, 92-1.3, 92-1.9, 92-1.5 and 92-1.8 will affect the magnitude and rate of population growth in the Village. The development potential of vacant property in Planning Area 6A recently has been limited by Conditional Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval by the Village Council. (Note: PUD approval is subject to Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval.) Conditional PUD approval has limited development potential in Planning Area 6A to 625 units, a reduction of 258 units from the Comprehensive Plan currently in effect. The cumulative effects of i.he eight proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on the remaining residential growth potential in the Village are shown on TABLES 9A and ~B, which are revisions to TABLES 3-23A and 3-23B (page 3-57), respectively, of the 1989 Support Documentation. 1 3-10 ~i 1 L N ~ v W K n ~ W v g z' o ~ w Z W o m 1 T. r ~ .{ r) ~ UI W K K W -1 d Q Q 4 ~~ 7 T Z Z ~_ U ~ ~j LL Z g x PS`pµt,c - J -t - n , .. ~_~ j~j o ~ - . ~ -= -- ~ 1,, .. ',a ,- ~ :, 1 .y \. N ,C -. . N I\ -~/ J ~ _ ! ~~ ~ E !, II ® ~ .: ~. cc~ ~, ~lC-~~-rn-~--, -, ~ i , ~~ N .-i .-~ - -~ ~ r 1 -- ..I-~1 ~N --1~ ., _ :~ -,~y- E E .o ~ v G ~ C F ..1 i/ 4. // P. s_ . ~ ~ ~_ ~-~~ N O~ 1~ I C - a' E - ~ - Q a Q a r ~~ ~~• •t~~~•`• 2 ~ ~ ,' i~i'~ ~~ •~ a ... , 112 I j<~ ~i!~ 1 fT.T W 'i 1 C d E b c d 6 a a ro x r ~ I ....s N ;..... 01 C CJ E C N E Q a x R,' W a z H z z a a a W a a H ``' z a o ~~ 1-1 F `" z w z a z w a N w 0 H U W W W w s-~i ~ 1 _ PGA DLVD s Y'~ ?S~' /.~ x se~~~~' a<x_,~;xs>~y.'`s%<n%r~; AMENDMENT #92-1 . 1 ,~: '-: ~ /~~/ ~~. s>~ as '4t^~x ~ V ~s .AS.~- - F 1 (`.:IRE J - 1 1 rbi D134~~ ,. rT 4 ~~t ~r.&"'~fc :: eacl ~~~~~~~~:?aAf ~ ~~ ~~ .. JJ ^".;.~~.1 -MONET ROAD Id 71 T Zr rT:TrTrr n mmR\ ' .~.N >R'~.::a~.y: iif/.? 9 ~:Yv. ' f~:~ rc /. %4. :J' :i .) '~h n<~,( F. Zi> $'~/. i i i ~:%i/i: - i'i ,~i:~::i:.i: ii':: vl. '.: .i::. ~ ~:::. i.:... ~f .ry' ~i:;::.i~' ';2i ...:4 ^>:Li::i::~ni. ~.... . i. 'iii ~i:J:. ::/::n:nv'•: i " iu.~.i:i;. ... ...iii%. n.:.. /.v.Y. .....~.i:: :.:..~ :::..').i ::..... .::: .:. i ~ ::. ....::....n;::v:::::.5.; NORTN PALM E3F=AC1-1 r~onln~ o zoo Doo FEET .Quota la u, Iw t.tf.• .'.,gf, '. ~~dr~. „,: ~~>. KEY '~ ;~ - ~.. - r'0¢¢~ CORPORATE LINITS: ----- ---~- . :~~ ~. g`s~~`s.' L:d1D USE CODE - REF: TABLE 3-11 '~~~ PIORT/1 PALM DEACN 20lING DISTRICTS ;§s' CI - Neighborhood Commercial CIA - Limi trd Corm,. Dl strict ~xi ~'~ R1 - Sl ogle Family Res. _ R3 - Ni qh Densl ly R<s./Apt. P - Public ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS: _ Palm De ach Gardens ' PO - Professional Off. C4-1- General Comrn. - - Palm Death County RII - Ili qh Densi lY Res. F11 - Nedium De nzi lY Rez. ' CG - General Comm. ~~ ~~ Z. ~ ~~ n 1~:\ ~~ r\'P` i 't?``~~k~''~~<,. ~ ~, EXISTING LAND USE MA EXISTIN ", G L NDUSE i`jf: ,r \ A \ .i. ~;:e•: r .:<:~ \. \, t1 ,.; i , r:-:,.::f~~~~ MAP SERIES , .l :.y.:}.. `.". . .i~\2: ..:~.. `}` ~ r` ~` ``>~`~i`^ PLANNING AREA 2 .l~~r,.::c::el::~:::; ~~`•,',~rF',"'.a~u\" ~:C'i~;^~iG~1Y' \\~`\, ~' F:,v;4;.tr':p:4. a\'titi;1\:C'':~q\.~\\,\~~ai~li{;. o _\,,,~~s??\r;.":e::<`r~~`tirT`S~`~:`iti `~;:~:~ilij,\\ oft;:.' ~i \\~ ~~ \ ; -c i:? , i 1., ill ~ \ , ~ \ \PG' ,.; ~ f t :::ry, cr"~<kz :'s~cb\,;\Sc +i"\q ~ ~i ~,`\Ir. f '. i P,I ~ IY . ~ ~ ~, t. , \~ \\ \\\\\\\~\ R3 r \\\', \ ,, •. q r ,,,,,, ., R 3 '' ., '', .~ •~: 3-36 Rev: AmendmenC 92-1 '2 _1 9 FIGURE 9 FIGURE J-18 . ~ i~~ n ~ u. ~ u ~ u ~ ~ u ~ ~ 1 1 u 1 u ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 n n n l .11111111 ~/ ~ ~#~~. /~ • .~~ 1111111 ~: KEY: COP.POFATE LIHITS: ------------.- LaJD USE CODE - REF: TABLE ~-~~ IJORTH PALH BEACH ZONING OI Si RICTS RI - Single Family Rez. R2 - Hul ti-Family Res. R3 - HigA Oensi ty Res./Apartment P - Public ADJACENT JURI SD(CTI ONS Palm Beach Gartlens 1111 CN/PBG - Neignborhootl Commercial PO/PBG - Professional Office X11. PDA/PBG - Pl annetl Development Area .1~ RH/PBG - Hetli um Density Res. Palm 8e ach County ~. - RS/PBC - Single Family Res. ~ i •:;~ •,y ;~; AMENDMENT #92-1 . 2• ~~ ;~ _o 9 T~• 9~ 1} _ 2 ~~ ;Y.'7 1. :~i~"~`::~:~ - - P .i'.• :~:;:~:~:;:~~~:::-:~:;:~:;:::;:~:;:;:~::::~:;.:~:~::;:~••;~`' EX1STiNG LAND USE MAP :~~ . m • '•'•'•"•'•' ~ R/ EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES .F: "R I ::.:}'~--• •:`~:~: '~:~:`~:"~'~:~:~:~:~:~ ? PLANNING AREA 6 A _~` {.:- :I~.T..~J.1 PROSPERITY MAROOR f - •~ > - ~ n11n1111nn1 .111m K 60UPC ~: L11 Y, 1MC.:/ea Rev: Amendment 92-1 3-50 NORT}~-~-1] PALM P1=ACf 1 Fl-JRIC~ 2l0 8i0 1 IDG FEET 3-;3 n cunE a-zo I([Y: Llu2rnrnlF I uulS:------------ I,~IIU'ISE Cln!C - P@F: :nULf 3-It IIUltlll I'nL11 I1fnCJ1 2DIIItIIi D15I121CIS f;l - Single Frrni l>' Res. lit - tLilli-I'amlly lies. p - Public nUJnCEtlt JIII2I SDIC1101 IS 1'a Im DeacG Gardens RII/POG - Nedi wn Densi tY Res. rfi-I/PUIi - General Comrnerci al GU/POG - Government Use 1'a lm 0e ach County RS/POC - Single Famllr Res. RI I: PDC - Ilul liple Faml IY Res. EXISTING LAND USE MAP ~XISTIFIG L!\tdDUSC Mnf SCIIIGS i:...~1 r~LnNrIIrIG WHEW z p1'?pPc:'~ ~F ;• ::r~, -;:: >~? •.I-:r n RZ RI RT RI cG-1 NOF=ITF-~ PALM [_3E/-PLC[-[ rLOFllon I ! 2I0 8I0 ,000 l FEET RT ., 2 L I~RI ~ AMENDMENTS: t92-1.6, #92-1.7, #92-1.8I_ /OY~C6 LAN, INC.L/~~ 3-54 Rev 3-14 Amendment 92-] 1 1 TABLE 4A Revised 1989 TABLE 3-23A ' REMAINING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL E'LANNING LOW DENSITY MEDIUM DENSITY HIGH DENSITY AREA ACRES UNITS1 ACRES UNITS1 AREAS UNITSI 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6x30 3.30 25 13 0 0 0.25 12 4 1.71. 4 0 0 0 0 5 0. 0 0 0 0.81 13 6 70-58 96.9 z19} 206 3r9329.8 49 232 25r`.s915.35~~ 184 7 2-}g 2.45 4 5 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 8069 109.36 3P4 2?8 3.-9329.8 46 232 26.-5616.36 577209 Total Acres - ~~0-&9 150.52 Total Units - 943- 669 TABLE 4B Revised 1989 TABLE 3-23B ' REMAINING POPULATION GROWTH~POTENTIAL TYPE UNITS HOUSEHOLD SIZE2 POPULATION3 High Density 577 209 ~~80 1.71 }039 393 Medium Density 40 232 .252 1.95 ~Ob 934 Low Density 324 228 3x05 3.10 S8E 677 Total 94I: 669 226 2.17 228 1454 1. Map-be-sabstant=Illy-redaeed-gentling-hhe-apg€ieaLien-a€-3et siae,-sekl3aek-and-builcliaq-height-limitations_as_per_the Boning-and-Subdrvisren-Rega}atrens-Eede-e~47;er€a->:e-speei€ie pa~se3s-e€-land: 2. 1x80---We€qh€ed-average-e€=1980-€iguros-£or-Hlanning_areas 2,3A,3E 2:52---1980-€€gare-€er-F€aAaiag-Area-3>1-~mixture_of_high and-lew-dens}>;y-uni>rs} 3-05---We#ghted-average-e€-€980-€#qures-€ar-Blanainq-Areas 4AT-4Br-6B-and-7 1: Maximum number of units established by Conditional P.U.D. approvals on Amendments Nos. 91-1.2, 91-1.3, 91-1.4 and 91-1.5. ' 2. Household sizes based upon discussions with develo ers p agents concerning target market profiles for proiects whi are the subiect of Amendment Nos. 91-1.2, 91-1.3, 91-1.4 and 91-1.5. 3. Assumes resident occupancy of 96% of housing units, based upon conversations with developers agents. SOURCE: LRM, INC.; 1988 and 10/91 nnhth73.73a 3-57 3-15 Estimates were prepared by Land Research Management, Inc., using development limitations imposed by the Conditional PUD approvals and ' discussions with developer's agents regarding target market profiles, including residency status and average household size. Rased on conversations with developer's agents concerning Amendments 92-1.2 through 92-1.5, it is concluded that the population of the amendments located in Planning Area 6A will consist entirely of resident population; therefore, seasonal resident projections con- tained in the 1989 Support Documentation will not change. Resident population projections are derived using expected absorption rates for projects located within Planning Area 6A, based on conver- sations with developer's agents. The application of these rates to remaining growth potential (TABLE 4B) results in the following revised population projections for the Village: 1994 - 14,124 residents (Base year 1991 of 13,449 residents plus 1991-1994 growth of 680) ' 1999 - 19,898 residents (Base year 1991 of 13,994 residents plus 1991-1994 growth of 1,454) Rased on the application of expected absorption rates, residential build-out can be projected to occur in 1998. Total population projections, based on page 3-59 of the 1989 Support Documentation, are revised as a result of the above projections and are presented below: 1994 Protections Resident Population 197322 ]4,124 Seasonal Population 2,120 't'otal 167942 16, 244 1 3-16 ' -189-`r 1998 Proiections Resident Population ~9-,484 19,898 Seasonal Population 2,120 Total ~6r627 17,018 1999 Proiections Resident Population ~4T994 14,898 Seasonal Population 2,120 Total 16-x627 17,018 9. Vacant Land Analysis. The cumulative effects of the eight amend- ments on the Village's vacant land inventory are shown on TABLE 5, which is a revision of TABLE 3-24 (page 3-60) of the 1989 Support ' Documentation. Vacant land has increased from 141.3 acres in 1988 to 180.7 acres, primarily as a result of the annexation of 33.4 acres of land north of Monet Road in Planning Area 6A (Amendment 92-1.2). Vacant land calculations also account for development activity in the village during the 1988-1991 period and changes resulting from the current group of proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments. 5. band Use Protections. Revisions to the 1999 residential land use projections are presented on TABLE 6, which is a revision of TABLF. 3--25 (page 3-63) of the 1989 Support Documentation. TABLE 6 incorpor- ates proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments and the anticipated con- struction schedules on properties that are the subjects of these Amendments. TABLE 7 presents revisions to TABLE 3-26 of the 1989 Support Documentation, based on buildout of the Village by 1998. 1'he buildout scenario was developed by Land Research Management, Inc., based on conversations with developers of properties in 1 3-17 TABLE 5 Revised 1989 TABLE 3-24 VACANT LAND SUMMARY (ACRES) LANDUSE CATEGORY PLANNING AREA COMMERCIAL RECREATION 1 4.00 0 2 5.53 0 3 8.50 0 4 1.67 0 5 1.13 0 6 9.30* 3.82 7 0 0 TOTAL 30.13 3.82 RESIDENTIAL (DENSITY) LOW MEDIUM HIGN 0 0 0 0 0 0 b-.38 3.30 0 0.25 1.71 0 0 . 0 0 0.81 ~$:5$ 96.90 3:93 29.85:50 15.3 ~_}$ 2.45 0 0 $$:6918'.36 .3.93 29.8.2b_5616.36 Total Vacant Land - ~11d~~3d 189.47 Acres *This figure represents vacant commercial land annexed to the Village in October 1989. SOURCE: LRM, INC.; 1988, 10/91 npbtb13.24 3-60 3-18 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE 6 Revised 1989 TABLE 3-25 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PROJECTIONS 1994 Resident Population Growth. (1987 1991-99) Resident Dwelling Unit Growth (1987 1991-99) x640 680 (Resident Growth) 2=26 2.331' (Average H/H size ) Total Year-round Dwelling Unit Growth (1987 1991-1994) 681 291 (Resident Unit Growth) 0=800.96 ?• (Resident Unit Occ. Rate) 1-, 5-4-0- 6 8 0 -6-8-1- 2 91 x-531 306 Distribution of Units by Density Category: Type Growth Share ~ Low -0-.-3~ 0.46 M e d i u m -0-.-0-4- 0. 2 3 H i g h -4.-6-2- 0.31 Total 1.00 19871991 -94 Growth (Units) 3 -~39- 10 8 34- 54 5,25- 19 4 ~r1- 3 0 6 Distribution of Landuse By Density Category: Intensity Factor Type 19871991-94 Units (Units/acre) 4. Low -289- 108 -A-.-(13- 2.39 Medium 34- 5q 1{},_l.g. 7.78 High 528- 14 4 ~1-.-7-2 12 .0 Totals -SS-1- 306 ~ $:-563 4.77 Footnotes: Acres ~brZ145.18 3-~3-4- 6 . 9 4 ~l_..3_L 12 .0 -9-9-.~b 6 9.12 -b~---g-F4-rat-a--sh-3t-EL-4f--F>tki-ldoikt -gr-0w-btu-Pokan~ia-l--duzin9---19$9~~iL -~era.od-.-fx~m. ~ab.l ~ a-23a -2-.----Clist-r-ibu~io:l--0f--Resa.danti-a-l--Bt~iklout--P-0tential, -by-$n-it -t~+pe~--f-r-om -fFatrle- 3--23A- -3 ~ - - -We-iy-ht-ed--aver-age- -o~- -po to-r:~i a-1- -detts~t i,es.. -£r..ort~ -uacant- -land- --aria-1'}ses;--T-a h].es- _3--1-2- -t.o- 3-~-2- 1. Derived based upon expected development absorption rates in Planning Area 6A and average household sizes from Table 3-23B, 2. Assumes 100% resident occupancy per developer expectations. 3. Based upon expected absorption rates in Planning Area 6A and continued growth trends in the remainder of the Village. 4. Densities fixed by Village development approvals. SOURCE: LRM, INC.; 1988, 10 91 npbtb13.25~ 3-63 ,~ TAR1,E 7 Land Use Residential Low Density (0-5.8 units/acre) Medium Density (5.81-11.0 units/acre) High Density (11.1-24.0 units/acre) Commercial Recreation/Open Space Conservation/Open Space Public Buildings and Grounds Educational Other Public Facilities Transportation 173.72 143.37 196.98 384.70 14.08 14.58 52.41 49787 269.98 268759 185.72 }98704 169.50 201.98 }96798 388.70* 14.08 14.58 52.41 49787 288.09 286770 1999 Area in Acres 64377} 74.92 ^189.0]2 E Q eT L O 169.50 201.98 }96798 386.70* 19.08 19.58 52.41 49787 288.09 286779 Water 1225.10 1225.10 1225.10 3106.23 3222.41 3290.70 Total Devel. ~ 6~ $ 189.97 68.29 Vacant }q}73} }}T8} 0.00 3290.70 3290.70 3290.70 TOTAL 3204748 3204748 3204748 *Assumes that Little Munyon Island will be awarded prote ction via the Conservation/Open Space Land Use Category SOURCE: -Public Services Department, North Palm Beach, 4/1/78 JLH Associates, 8/1/87, LRM, Inc. 2/1/88, 9/1/897; and 10/91 npbtb113.26 Revised 1989 TABLE 3-26 LAND USE PROJECTIONS 1991 X88 1994 Area in Area in Acres Acres 586.19 3f~ 0.19. 5837}9 636797 45:12 52.06 8 T 8 } _ ~ r =~ G 1 3-65 3-20 Planning Area 6A, which contains 89% of the vacant land within the Vi]lage. Assumptions regarding growth in the following land use categories remain unchanged from the 1989 Support Documentation: Commercial; Conservation/Open Space; Public Buildings and Grounds; Educational; Other Public Facilities; Transportation, and Water. Residential projections have been revised to reflect the lower densities in Planning Area 6A and, the anticipated construction schedules associ- ated with proposed Amendments 92-1.2 through 92-1.5. Recreation and Open Space projections have been increased by ~.0 acres to reflect proposed Amendment 92-1.5B. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments 92-1.1 through 92-1.8 are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; however, several ' Future Land Use Map Series and related policy changes are required to accommodate the specific nature of these amendments. Specific Future Land Use Map and Policy Amendments are presented in the Appendix of this document. 3-21 3.3 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION A. DATA SUMMARY ' Among the eight items under review as part of the proposed 92-1 Amendme~sts, four will have signific:~nt traffic impact on the Village roadway system. Proposed Amendments 92-1.1, 92-1.6 and 92-1.7 are existing projects annnexed to the Village. Traffic generated by these properties were included in the background counts used in the 1989 Support Documentation. Proposed Amendment 92-1.8 is an annexed, vacant single-family lot that, by itself, will have no significant impact on the roadway system. Therefore,•the following proposed 92-1 Amendments are judged to have no additional impacts to the roadway :system and will receive no further consideration in the analysis that follows. Amendment Project Name Planning Area Affected Roadway 92-I.1 Twelve Oaks 2 AlA 92-1.SB Village Park 6A Prosperity Farms Road 92-1.6 Fisher~.~an's Village 7 Prosperity Farms Road 'i2-1.7 First Unitarian Church 7 Prosperity Farms Road 92-1.8 Dean Property 7 Prosperity Farms Road 1'he remaining traffic impact analyses will concentrate on the four proposed 92-1 Amendments identified below, all of ~ohich are located in Planning Area 6A having ingress/egress on Prosperity Farms Road. Amendment Project Name Plannin g Area Affected Roadway 92-1.2 Prosperity Harbor N 6A Prosperity Farms Road 92-7.3 Sanctuary Bay 6A Prosperity Farms Road 92-1.4 Sanctuary Cove 6A Prosperity Farms Road 92-1.5A Prosperity Harbor S 6A Prosperity Farms Road The locati ons of the above Amendments are illustrated i.n FIGURE 6. 1 1 3-22 The following analysis Support Documentation. are used herein rather activity on Prosperity stuction activities re segment in 1991. utilizes the same methodology as the 1989 Average Annual Daily Traffic counts for 1990 than the 1991 AADT counts due to construction Farms Road. It is concluded that these con- sulted in abnormally low AADTs on this roadway TABLE 8 illustrates 1990 roadway conditions prior to ongoing improve- ments along Prosperity Farms Road. According to the Palm Beach County Engineering Department's Construction Coordination Division, improve- ments to Prosperity Farms Road were divided into two segments: (1) 10th Avenue in Lake Park to Burns Road; and (2) Burns Road to PGA Boulevard. Construction improvements began on both segments in October 1990 with the segment between Burns Road and PGA Boulevard completed in J!ne 1991. The segment between 10th Avenue and Burns Road is scheduled for completion in December 1991. TABLE 8 compares the AADT volumes recorded for 1990 and 1991, clearly indicating the effect construction improvements had on this roadway segment. Thus, 1990 AADT volumes were used to define base-year back- ground traffic levels to which future projected growth will be added. Further shown in TABLE 8 is the Level of Service (LOS) on this road- way by segment prior to any improvements. No AADT count data ex.st oat the roadway segment on Prosperity Farms Road between Lighthouse Drive and Burns Road prior to 1991. As a result; the AADT volume of this segment in 1990 had to be estimated. In' order to estimate a 1990 AADT figure on Prosperity Farms Road be- tween Lighthouse Drive and Burns Road, it was assumed that the ratio of 1991 AADT counts on Prosperity Farms Road, north and south of Lighthouse Drive was eoual to that which existed in 1990. By applying the 1991 ratio to the 1990 AADT count south of Lighthouse Drive, an estimated 1990 AADT count was derived for the segment north of Lighthouse Drive. This methodology results in an estimated 7990 AADT t count :aetween Lighthouse Drive and Burns Road of 13,530 vehicles per day. 3-23 TRBLE 8 N.P.B. CAPACITY Atk1LYS1S FOR IX15F111G ROADUAY SYSTEM (1990 Traffic Volunes) STATION ROADUAY 2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd (2) Prosperity Fns Rd 2836-2(3)Prosperity Fns Rd 2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd (4) Prosperity Fns Rd SEGNEM S of PGA Blvd to RCA BlvdMonet S of RCA B1vdMonet to Burns Rd. N of Lighthouse Dr. io Burns Rd. N o{ NL Blvd. io Eagle Uay N of Eagle Uay to Lighthouse Dr. 4102(5) Lighthouse Drive E. of Prosperity Farns Road (d) Lighthouse Drive U. of Prosperity Farns Road (]) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial CO-C -County Collector CT-C - City Collector ~ LOS E 1490 1990 1991 AADT V/C CIASS(1) LANES TYPES AADT AADT CAPACITY RATIO LOS CO-C 2 ~ Undivided 15626 12662 17400 .90 D CO-C 2 Undivided 15626 12662 17400 .90 D CO-C 2 Undivided 13530 10125 17400 .78 D CO-C 2 Undivided 19312 10710 17400 .82 D CO-C 2 Undivided 14312 10710 17400 .82 D CT-C 2 Undivided 10197 n/a 17400 .59 B CT-C 2 Undivided 5608 n/a 17400 .32 A J (2) Used sane AADT volune as station 2804-2 for this roadway srgnent. (3) AADT volune esiinated for this roadway segnent by using the percentage difference between 2806-2 and 283d-2 in 1991 and applying this percentage to the 1940 2606-2 volune. (4) Used sane AADT volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway seynent. (5) Tenpory count station established 6y County for a one tine count taken in Narch 1990 (1st Drier PeaK Caunl). Derived an annual average daily volune by applying a .98 factor to the Peak count of 10405. (d) AADT volune esiinated by using the February 27, 1990 ]ntersection Count at Lighthouse Drive and Prosperity Farns Road to determine the percentage difference of traffic west-bound to east-bound of 55 percent. Then applied this percentage to io the east-bound tenporary 9102 count station to estinaie the west-bound traffic count. L' 3-29 }]. ANAT.YSIS f:xisting or background Lraffic volumes are projected for the planning periods established in the 1989 Support Documentation. The derivation of the compound annual. growth rates utilized in projecting traffic volumes is presented in TABLE 9. Compound annual growth rates are based on current (1990) AADT counts and projected 2010 AADT volumes from the 2010 Interim Transportation System Plan :,dopted by the Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in 1988. Anal- yses performed in the 1989 Support Documentation were based on the 1995 Interim Transportation System Plan; however, Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code requires that best available data be used to assess proposed Plan Amendments. Therefore, the 2010 Interim Transportation System Plan is used as a basis for the analyses pre- sented herein. According to the analysis section of the Futyre Land Use section of this document, a majority of the remaining growth within the Village will be generated by development of the four 92-1 Amendment projects within Planning Area 6A. TABLES l0A and lOB identify projected daily trip generation from these projects impacting Prosperity Farms Koad .segments as of 1994 and 1998 (i.e. the projected buildout date). FIGURES 6 and 7 graphically depict the loading from these projects onto Prosperity Farms Road segments in 1994 and 1998, respectively. Separate generation analyses, as part of the traffic impact analyses for each of the 92-1 Amendment projects under consideration have been prepared as part of the related development approvals. Inform- ation from those analyses was used to develop to composite trip gen- eration scenarios shown in TABLE l0A and lOB and illustrated in FIGURE 6 and FIGURE 7. The projected impacts of 92-1 Amendment projects on Prosperity Farms Read seg?rents in 1994, 1998 and 1999 are summarized in TABLES ]1, ' 12A and 12B, respectfully. Projected 1994 AADT traffic volumes were derived by adding the following components: 3-25 TABLE 9 COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATES BETWEEN 1990 -2010 (iUAI 6ROWTN RATES BETUEEN 1990 - 2010 STATION ROADWAY SEGNEt1T 2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd S of PGA Blud to RCA B1vdMonet (2) Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA B1vdMonet to Burns Rd. 2836-2(3)Prosperity Fns Rd N of Lighthouse Dr. io Burns Rd. 2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd Not NL Blvd. to Eagle Way (4) Prosperity Fns Rd l1 of Eagle Uay to Lighthouse Dr. 4102(5) Lighthouse Drive E, o{ Prosperity Earns Road (5) Lighthouse Drive W. 01 Prosperity Farms Road (1) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial CO-C - County Collector CT-C - Ciiy Collector COHPOIND 1NPRV 1990 2010 ANNUAL CIASS(1) LANES TYPES MDT MDT GRTB.RTE CO-C 5 Undivided 15626 20000 1.24 CO-C 5 Undivided 15626 20000 1.24 CO-C 3 Undivided 13530 20000 1.97 CO-C. 5 Undivided 14312 20000 1.69 CO-C 3 Undivided 14312 20000 1.69 CT-C 2 Undivided 10197 14007 1.60 CT-C 2 Undivided 5608 7103 1.60 (2) Used sane MDT volune as station 2804-2 for this roadway segment. (3) MDT volune esiinated for this roadway segneni by using the percentage difference between 2806-2 and 2836-2 in 1991 and applying this percentage to the 1490 2606-2 volune. (4) Used sane MDT volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway segment. (5) 2010 MDT uolunes derived by applying an annual average growth rate of 1.6 percent as jusii{ied in the 1489 1989 Village Comprehensive Plan Support Documentation. 1 1 3-26 i ACA BIV O. R ~ ~ r' c~.^ ..-... r ~ee_ (243> RCA 9lV O. 6 J O. N m 1( s o !~ N ... v fD '(405> BURRS a0. ~ M o M v ^ LEGEND A LEUEL OF SERVICE SlN NINBER OF LANES 1145 PLAN ANENONENTS PROJECT TRAFFIC > TRAFFIC DIRECTION <> REPRESENTS TIWFf1C BOTH D1RECi1CNS (17795) 70TAL TRAFFIC VOL. FOR RD. SER(ENT A 9 2lN 2lN <96> (02> (6072) (10947) ucl ~~ m~~~ M v ti ., T N Q t W r 1- ,. ~ ~o W a~~;,°, o VJ N 11') N 0 N ORTNLAKE ., ~ llVO, IHTRACOA$TAl WA7ER WAY ~ GROSFERITY NA R80R ' ~~~ FIGURE 6 1 9 9 4 AMENDMENT 92-1 DAILY TRAFFIC NOT TO SC AI! 3-27 LIRO. s s.. ~5 CJ: 92-1.i 92-T.6A ACA BIV O. ZJ ~ vs m P N M ~ N T O ~ 1 9S-~ <$09) RCA Bl`/D. Q 4~'s t7 v o N ~+ ~+ v N (1088) BURNS RD. "L ~/ I IN TRAC OASTA~ ~`I{tl`/ WATERWAY 2~kT .T ~'t~.~ 0S-T.6A ~ PROSPERITY HARBOR z ~ m ~] f~ M t7 P m v .p C A 2W 21N (171) (200) (117$4) (6679) LIGHTHOUSE DR. m p7 J M N m.na v .~. O ... LEGEND A LEVEL OF SERVICE a ~ ~ a $LN NLMBER OF LPNES 114$ PLAN ANENONENTS PROJECT TRAFFIC NORTHLAKE v TRAFFIC DIRECTION <> REPRESENTS TRAFFIC BOTH DIRECTIONS (1779$) TOTAL TRAFFIC VOI. FOR R0. SEGMENT .~. HOT TO kALC FIGURE Y 1 9 9 8 AMENDMENT 92-1 DAILY TRAFFIC PROJECTED BUII D-OUT J ~~ U 3-28 .cA ew o. 1 .. ~. 1!~) M Q M N ~ \ It r a,-, z~rll. (SD 9) [......~rF ~~'- -5 _ p i INTRACOASTA~ RCA BIY O. L1Ajff,~IRO. WATERWAY Q J O N .p '.T.. ~ " ~ ~Zn'8'm^, ~ B.yl~ w.u (1008) B VRNS ~ PROSPERITY HARBOR m ~ n ~ I M v A 2lN 2LN U71) <200> (11942) (6777) ' SE OR. LEGEND A LEVEL OF SERVICE 5LN NU18ER DF lA4ES 1145 PLAN ANENDHENTS PROJECT TRAFFIC > TRAFFIC DIRECTION <) REPRESENTS TPAFfIC 60TH DIRECTIONS (17795) TOTAL TRAFFIC VOL. FOR RD. SE81EM ... u NOT TO tCAIC NO RT m n m ~ M M 1I) N v n v N Q W ZJm~ Q 11'! N N ~ti FIGURE 8 1 9 9 9 FUTURE ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 3-29 Table 10A Daily Trip Generation - 1994 Prosperity Farms Road ' (1) the 1990 base year background traffic counts from TABLE 8; (2) the 1990-1994 background traffic growth derived by applying the annual. compound growth rate from TABLE 9 to the 1990 AADT counts over the five-year period; and (3) the trip generation values from TABLE 0A. The projected AADT counts derived using the above methodology are shown in TABLE 11 under the heading "1994 w/PRJ" (1999 with Project). As TABLE 11 indicates, all Prosperity Farms Road segments are pro- jected to be at LOS A except for the three-lane segment between Eagle Way (1500 feet south of the Earman River) and Lighthouse Drive, which is projected at I.OS B. Using a methodology similar to that described above, TABLE 12A summaries projected traffic impacts at buildout of the four 92-1 Amendment projects under review. Compound annual growth rates from 1'A BL F. 9 were applied to projected 1999 AADT volumes plus remaining 92-1 Amendment project trip generation to derive total projected AADT volumes on each road segment. This method may actually over- state future AADT volumes, since the 2010 Interim Transportation System Plan accounts for the future development of vacant land, including the 92-1 Amendment projects, as we13 as projected roadway improvements. It is therefore concluded that the approach used in this analysis maximi•r.es projected AADT volumes on Prosperity Farms Road segments using best available information. TABLE 12A indicates that by 1998 only the segment north of Prosperity Farms Road located between Lighthouse Drive and Burns Road will decline from LOS A to LOS B. All the other segments are projected to remain at the same levels of service as in 1994. TABU: ]2B presents projected traffic impacts for 1999, as required by Chapter 9J-5.005.4, Florida Administrative Code. Since the Village ' is projected to attain buildout by 1998, only a small increase in AADT volumes is projected for 1999, consisting solely of projected 3-31 TABLE I1 ' N.P.B. CAPACITY NfALYSIS OF ROAOUAY SYSTBI - 1994 ~ LDS E 1494 STATION ROADWAY SEGHEM CLASS(1) LANES TYPES 1994 BKGND 1994 u/PRJ AADT CAPACITY V/C RAT10 LOS 2809-2 Prosperity Fns Rd S of PGA Blvd to RCA B1vdMonei CO-C 5 Undivided 16416 17795 4000D .44 A (2) Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA Blvd/Monei to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undivided 16416 18235 40000 ,46 A 2836-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of Lighthouse Dr. to Burns Rd. CO-C 3 Undivided 14628 15101 27270 .55 A 2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of NL Blud. to Eagle Uay CO-C 5 Undivided 15304 15566 40000 39 A (3) Prosperity Fns Rd N of Eagle Uay to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undivided 15304 15566 21270 . .57 B 9102(4) lighthouse Drive E. of Prosperity Farns Road CT-C 2 Undivided 10865 10947 17400 .63 B (4) Lighthouse Drive U, of Prosperity Farns Road CT-C 2 Undivided 5976 6072 17400 .35 A (1) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial CO-C - County Collector ' CT-C - Ciiy Collector (2) Used sane AADT volune as station 2804-2 for this roadway segnent. (3) Used sane AADT volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway segaent. (4) 1944 AADT volunes derived by applying an annual average growth rate of 1.6 percent as justified in the 1489 Conprehensive Plan Support Docunentation. 1 3-32 ' TABLE 12A I(.P.B. CAPACIIY ANALYSIS OF ROADUAY 5YSTEN AT BUILD-OUT - 1998 7 LOS E 1448 1948 1948 AADT V/C STATION ROADUAY SEGMENT CIASS(!> LANES TYPES BKGND u/PRJ CAPACITY RAT10 LOS 2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd 5 of PGA Blvd to RCA BlvdMonet CO-C S Undivided 18694 20138 40000 .50 A (2) Prosperity Fns Rd S o{ RCA B1udMonet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undivided 14156 T1100 40000 .53 A 2836-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of Lighthouse Dr. io Burns Rd. CO-C 3 Undivided 16327 16831 27270 .62 B 2806-1 Prosperity Fns Rd N of NL Blvd. to Eagle Uay CO-C 5 Undivided 16645 16421 40000 .42 A (3) Prosperity Fns Rd N of Eagle Uay to Ligh ihouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undivided 16645 16921 27270 .62 B 9102(4) Lighthouse Drive E. o{ Prosperiiy Farns Road CT-C 2 Undivided 11665 11754 17400 .66 C (4) Lighthouse Drive U. of Prosperity Farns Road CT-C 2 Undivided 6470 6670 17400 .38 A ' (1) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial , CO-C - County Collector CT-C - City Collector (2) Used sane AADT uolune as station 2804-2 for this roadway segoent. (3) Used sane AADT volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway seynent. (4) 1498 AADT uolunes derived by applying an annual average growth rate o{ 1.6 percent as justi{ied in the 1484 Conprehensive Plan Support Docunentation. 1 3-33 TABLE 126 N.P.B. CAPACITY ANALYSIS OF ROADUAY SYSTEM - 1999 7 LOS E 1999 STATIQI ROADUAY SEGHEM CLASS(1) LNfES TYPES 1999 AADT AADT fAPAC1IY V/C RATIO LOS 2804-2 Prosperity Fns Rd S of PGA Blud to RCA Blud/Nonet .CO-C 5 Undivided 20388 40000 51 A (2) Prosperity Fns Rd S of RCA Blud/Nonet to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undivided 21362 40000 . 53 A 2836-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of Lighthouse Dr. io Burns Rd, CO-C 3 Undivided 17163 27270 . 63 B 2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of NL Blud. io Eagle Uay CO-C 5 Undivided 17207 40000 . 43 A (3) Prosperity Fns Rd N of Eagle Uay to Lighthouse Dr. CD-C 3 Undivided 17207 27270 . .63 B 9102(4) Lighthouse Drive E. o{ Prosperity Farns Road (4) lighthouse Drive U. of Prosperity Farns Road (1) U-PA - Urban Principal Arterial CO-C - County Collector CT-C - City Collector (2) Used sane AADT uolune as station 2804-2 for this roadray segneni. (3) Used sane AADT volune as station 2806-2 for this roadway segnent. (4) 1499 AADT uolunes derived by applying an annual average growth rate of 1.6 percent asied in the 1964 Cmprehensiue Plan Support Documentation. 1 1 i Ci-C 2 Undivided 11941 17400 .69 C CT-C 2 Undivided 67]7 17400 .39 A 3-39 increase in background traffic. Considering the slight projected in- O cs'ease in AADT volumes from 1998, TABLE 12B indicates that the LOS along each segment of Prosperity Farms Road should remain unchanged from the projected 1998 LOS shown in TABLE 12A. Finally, a peak-hour traffic analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of potential congested conditions occurring along Prosperity Farms Road segments. The peak-hour capacities table (i.e. TABLF, 9-3B) and the roadway peak-hour-demand-to-capacity ratios established in the 1989 Support Documentation were used in this analysis. TABLE 13 shows projected peak-hour volumes along with the associated LOS for each Prosperity Farms Road segment within the Village for 1995, 1998 and 1999. 'i`he analysis indicates that Prosperity Farms Road, as currently being improved, will not decline below LOS R for any segment through 1999. ' The above analysis indicates that current improvements to Prosperity Farms Road are adequate to support the four 92-1 Amendment projects through 1999. The only other roadway iaithin the Village affected by the 92-1 Amendment projects is Lighthouse Drive. The LOS on this roadway as analyzed (i.e. TABLES 11, 12A and 12B) is projected to decline from LOS B in 1999 to LOS C by 1999, which will not require any additional roadway improvements. Burns Road and RCA Boulevard are the other roadways affected by the 92-1 Amendments; however, both facilities are located outside of Village jurisdiction. The Village should cooperate with the City of Palm Beach Gardens to identify contributing impacts on these roads and any future related improvement needs and responsibilities. Intergovernmental coorc'in- ation should be the mechanism for addressing this issue. C. GOALS, OBJECTI^IVES AND POLICIES 7'he proposed 92-1 Amendments are consistent with the 't'raffic Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and no ' additional text amendments are proposed. 3-35 TABLE 13 ' PROJECTED PEAK HOUR CAPACITY AtIALYSIS OF ROADUAY SYSTEM 1444 1448 1444 PK.HRf2) PK HRa/ PK HR}/ PK HR+/ STATlQ1 R04DUAY SEGMENT CIASS(1) IANES TYPES CAPACIIY LOS as LOS to LOS as 2804-2 Prosperity Fms Rd S of PGA Blvd to RCA B1vdMonet CO-C 5 Undivided 3600 1604/A 1612/A 1635/A (3) Prosperity fns Rd S ot RCA BlvdMonei to Burns Rd. CO-C 5 Undivided 3600 1641/A 1899/A 1423/A 2836-2 Prosperity fns Rd N of lighthouse Dr. to Burns Rd. CO-C 3 Undivided 2454 1359/A 1515/8 1545/6 2806-2 Prosperity Fns Rd N of NL Blvd. to Eagle Uay CO-C 5 Undivided 3600 1401/A 1523/A 1549/A f4) Prosperity Fns Rd N of Eagle Uay to Lighthouse Dr. CO-C 3 Undivided 2454 1401/A 1523/8 1549/8 4102 Lighthouse Drive E. of Prosperity Farms Road CT-C 2 Undivided 1566 485/8 1056/C 1075/C Lighthouse Drive U. o f Prosperity Farns Road CT-C 2 Undivided 1566 536/A 600/A 610/A + Peak hour voles derived using a peaking characteristic of Y/. applied to the 1444, 1998 6 1444 ARDT volumes iron ' Tables 4-7, 4-B k 4-9 respectively. ea Peak hour LOS derived by examining peak hour demand to peak hour capacity and applying the sane V/C ratios as used in examining AADT demand to AADT capacity. (1) U-PA - Urban Principal Rrierial CO-C - County Collector CT-C - City Collector (2) Peak hour volumes based on a 9Y. peaK hour {actor comonly used in Paln Beach County and identi{ied as Table 4-38 in the Comprehensive Plan Support Documentation. (s) Used same Peak volume as station 2804-2 {or this road,~ay segment. (4) Used sane Peak volume as station 28D6-2 for this roadoaY segment. 1 3-36 3.4 fi0US1NG A. DATA SUMMARY Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments 92-1.1 and 92-1.6 affect the Village's current housing inventory. According to the 1989 Support Documentation, the housing stock consisted of 6,907 dwelling units. According to TABLE 14, which is an update of TABLE 5-1 (page 5-3) of the 1989 Support Documentation, 12 single-family units were permitted in the Village during the 1988 - March 1991 period. Adding the units incorporated within the Village by the Twelve Oaks and Fisherman's Village annexations results in a current housing stock of 6,659 units, with the following unit-type breakdown: Single-Family 2,296 units Duplex 154 units Multiple-Family 9,259 units 1 B. ANALYSIS According to TABLE 4B, remaining residential buildout in the Villaye is 669 units . Residential development projections during the 1991 - 1994 period are presented in TABLE 6, with remaining buildout expected to occur during the 1994 - 1999 period. Future housing stock projections are presented in the following table, which is a revision to the in-text table presented on page 5-]3 of the 1989 Support Documentation. Unit Type Densit l,ow Medium Fiigh Total. Y 1987 2,222 52 4,133 6,407 Number of Units 1991 1999 2,246 2,354 159 208 4,259 4,403 6,659 6,965 1999 2,474 386 4,968 7,328 3-37 TABLE 19 Revised 1989 TABLE 5-1 VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY 1980-87 91 NUMBER OF UNITS Single-Family Multiple-Family Mobile No. Unit Cost ~ No. Unit Cost Motel Home 1979 6 106,396 150 99,495 0 0 1980 3 139,000 165 48,710 0 0 1981 11 195,769 117 69,102 0 0 1982 13 171,916 0 NA 0 0 1983 9 107,123 29 25,000 0 0 1989 10 232,134 9 36,889 0 0 1965 7 292,168 0 NA 0 0 1986 3 299,500 0 NA 0 0 1987 5 103,379 9 84,570 62 0 1988 S 236,900 0 NA 0 0 1989 5 257,151 0 NA 0 0 1990 2 153,310 3 72;000 0 0 1991* 0 NA 0 NA 0 0 Note: No units were converted and 9 were removed from the Housing Stock during the 1979-8791 period; nor were there any mobile home placements or removals. * First Quarter, 1991 data only. Source: Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning and Building Department; LRM, Inc.; 1988; 1991. 26/t5-x.npb 5-3 ~~ J 1 1 3-38 ' The projected number of housing units within the Village in 1994 is 594 fewer than what boas projected in the 1989 Support Documentation due to the reduction of overall project densities in Planning Area 6A and the associated delayed construction schedules. In 1987 (page 5-14 of the 1989 Support Documentation), it was estim- ated that there were 5,509 permanent resident households in the Village; 1991 estimates are revised to indicate a total of 5,843 resident households (1987 total + 1987-91 growth of 12 units + the annexations of Fisherman's Village and Twelve Oaks). Projections of total household growth are given in the following table, which is a revision of the in-text table presented on page 5-14 of the 1989 Support Documentation. 1987 1994 -1-991r 1999 (rrl-9O fr, 2fr2- 5,509 6:134 -6-r2fi-2- 6,485 The above table w as derived by adding household growth projections during 1991-1994 from TABLE 6 to the current estimated number, and assuming that the remaining growth potential will be realized by 1999. Projected growth in rented vs. owned units during the 1987 - 1999 period is presented on the following table, which is a revision to the in-text table on page 5-14 of the 1989 Support Documentation. Growth ]'ime Period Rented Units Owned Units 1987 - 1999 }q0 114 gq} 511 1995 - 1999 }5 64 57 287 I~ 3-39 7'he addition of existing and potential units to the Village's future housing stock is nearly offset by the reductions in density within ' Planning Area 6A represented by proposed Amendments 92-1.2 and 92-1.5. The majority of remaining residential development potential is within Planning Area 6A, as was the case at the time that the 1989 Support Documentation was prepared. Availability of services for the proposed Amendment 92-1 projects is discussed in the following sections of this document. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Proposed Amendment 92-1 is consistent witY; the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and no additional text amendments are proposed. ~I 1 3-90 L_J A. SANITARY SEWER DATA AND ANALYSIS Wastewater flow projections for proposed Amendment 92-1 properties are presented on TABLE 15. Projected average and maximum daily flow calculations for the Village are presented on page 6.1-10 of the 1989 Support Documentation. Revisions to the in-text table thereon are presented in the following table, based on the revised population projections contained in the Future Land Use Element. 3.SSANITAkY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER, AND NA1'U RAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER REC}IARGE ELEMENT Year Population 1986 12,968 1994 }4T322 19,124 1999 }4489 19,898 Average Daily Flow (MGD) 1.05 1x21 1.19 122 1.26 Maximum Daily Flow (MGD)2 1.67 1T92 1.89 1194 2.00 1 Resident population x 84.5 gallons per day ?. Resident population x 134 gallons per day From the above table it is concluded that average and maximum daily w.,ste flow projections for 1999 will be reduced by approximately 1.6% as a result of proposed 92-1 Amendments. Further, 1999 average and maximum daily flow is projected to increase by approximately 3.2%• As a result, capacity requirements within the Seacoast Utilities Authority system are essentially similar to those projected in the 1989 Support Documentation. According to the SeacoastUtilities staff, existing treatment facil- ities have a combined capacity of 7.58 MGD. Planned and approved capacity expansions currently underway total 3.97 MGD. Total existing and_committed capacity is therefore 11.05 MGD: Current demand (i.e. July, 1991) is G.14 MGD and future commitments total 0.955 MGD. 'focal 3-91 TAIIL F, 15 WASTE WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS POPULAT ION AVG. DAILY DEMAND (Gal) PEAK DEMAND (Gal) AMENDMENT` 1994 1999 19941 19991 19942 19992 92-1.1 976 976 31,916 31,916 99,504 49,504 92-1.2 141 255 9,306 16,830 19,669 26,520 92-1.3 90 939 5,990 28,644 9,360 45,136 92-1.4 236 302 15,576 19,932 29,549 31,908 92-I.5 137 364 9,092 29,029 19,246 37,856 92-1.6 125 125 8,250 8,250 13,000 ]3,000 92-1.7 NA NA 2,6923 2,6923 4,3714 4,3714 92-1.8 3 3 198 196 312 312 TOTAL 1,208 1,959 62,920 131,966 130,003 208,]07 footnotes: ' 1 population x 66 gallons/capita /day 2 population x 1 09 gallons/capita /day 3 acres x 1,060 gallons/acre/day 4 acres x 1,721 gallons/acre/day Source: Land Research Management, Inc. (10/91) (NOTE: Total Vi llage waste water flow projections, as per page 3-41, include b oth residential a nd non-residential flows expressed on a per capita basis. Flow projections on the above table are components of th e total flow figures util ized on page 3-91.) ~ 1 L 3-92 ' existing and committed demand therefore is estimated at 64.2% of existing and committed capacity. TABLE 15 projects a maximum daily flow of 0.06313 MGD in 1999 and 0.1412 MGD in 1999 for Amend- ments 91-1.1, 91-1.3, 91-1.9, 91-1.5 and 91-1.8. (Note: Proposed Amendments 91-1.1, 91-1.6 and 91-1.7 are currently being served by Seacoast Utilities Authority facilities.) On the basis of the preceding analysis, it is concluded that Sea- coast Utilities Authority has adequate capacity to serve proposed Amendment 92-1. Prior to the time that any projects are developed within the Village, a Certificate of Concurrency Reservation must be issued, pursuant to Chapter 2, Concurrency Management of the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida Land Development Regulations. In order for the Village to issue a Certificate of Concurrency Reservation, it first must be ' demonstrated that one of the following conditions are met: (1) Capital sanitary sewer facilities are in place to sufficiently serve the proposed development based on the LOS, and a reservation of capacity has been received from the service provider; (2) Capital sanitary sewer facilities that will provide sufficient services based on the LOS are under construction and bonded, and a reservation of capacity has been received from the service provider; or; (3) Capital sanitary sewer facilities that will provide the proposed development sufficient services based on the LOS are committed to be provided by the Applicant, pursuant to a Development Agreement. The Concurrency Management System adopted by the Village will assure that adequate sanitary sewer service capacity and facilities are avai]able concurrent-with any development impacts resulting from the proposed 91-1 Amendments. 3-43 B. SOLID WASTE~DA1'A AND ANALYSIS ' Solid waste generation projections for proposed Amendment 92-1 prop- erties are presented in TABLE 16. Projected solid waste generation calculations are presented in TABLE 6.2-5 (page 6.2-10) of the 1989 Support Documentation. Revisions to TABLE 6.2-5 are presented below, based on revised population projections. REVISED 1989 TABLE 6.2-5 SOLID WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE NORTH PALM BEACH REGIONAL CAPABILITY NORTH PALM BEACH YEAR (tons/year) (tons/year) CONTRIBUTION 1999 15-,021 19,391 1,095,000 -1,x-7- 1.31 -1985 15x290 b.-495,-0L14 -1-.-4-0- 1999 }5-,290 15,073 1,095,000 r.-4O 1.37 The Pal B h C ' m eac ounty Solid Waste Authority (SWA) is responsible for solid waste disposal throug hout Palm Beach County . The StJA staff has indicated that the regional disposal facility can accommodate the County's needs through the Year 2000 (1989 Support Documentation). Proposed Amendment 92-1 is expected to result in slightly less solid waste generation by the Village than was previously projected. As a result, it is concluded that the solid waste disposal needs of pro- posed Amendment 92-1 can be accommodated by the SWA. Further, the Village's concurrency management system discussed in the Sanitary Sewer section above, will assure that adequate solid waste capacity and facilities are available concurrent with any development .impacts resulting from the proposed 92-1 Amendment. 1 3-d9 ~I 1 II TABLE 16 SOLID WASTE GENERATION CALCULATIONS SINGLE-FAMILY POPUL ATION AMENDMENT 1994 1999 92-1.1 93 93 92-1.2 141 255 92-1.3 0 0 92-1.9 0 0 92-1.5 137 369 92-1.6 0 0 92-1.7 NA NA 92-1.8 3 3 TOTAL 329 665 MULTI-FAMILY POPULATION 1994 1999 939 939 0 0 90 939 236 302 0 0 125 125 NA NA 0 0 885 1,295 WASTE GENERATION (t< 19991 295 131 53 139 127 74 152 3 837 ins/year) 19991 295 236 255 178 337 79 152 3 1,393 Footnotes: 1 Based on bevel of Service Standard calculated as follows: single-family population x 0.926 tons/capita/year + multiple- family population x 0.588 tons/capita/year 2 Based on Level of Service Standard of 6.0 tons/acre/year Source: band Research Management, Inc. (10/91) 3-45 C. DKAINAGE DATA AND ANALYSIS The proposed 92-1 Amendments consist of nine properties, three of ' which are currently developed. Th~•se developed properties - 92-1.1, 92-1.6 and 92-1.7 - comprise a total of 40.2 acres. Existing projects discharge stormwater into either Lake Worth (92-1.1) or the C-17 Canal (92-1.6 and 92-1.7). Drainage from proposed Amednment 92-1.8 will be accommodated by existing systems either within Fisherman's Village or the single-family neighborhood to its west. Proposed 92-1 Amendments within Planning Area 6A are all currently undeveloped and specific drainage plans have not been completed. The Village has adopted Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to assure that adequate drainage facilities are constructed and that related environmental issues are addressed. A summary of pertinent LDRs that will be applied to proposed 92-1 Amendments in Planning Area 6A include: 1. LOS Standard - facilities must accommodate a 3-year frequency, ' 29-hour duration-design storm rainfall as defined by the South Florida Water Management District; 2. Legal Positive Outfall - facilities must have access and connection to a point of legal positive outfall; 3. Flood Hazard Reports - projects within'flood hazard zones will be required to calculate flow protection elevations to assure safety from the regulatory flood; 4. Post-Development Runoff Criteria - post-development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads shall not exceed pre-development levels as defined by Chapters 90E-4, 90E-40 and/or 40E-91, Florida -Administrative Code; 5. ldater Quality - landscaped areas, grassed areas, or other natural ' vegetated areas shall be provided to receive runoff from buildings 3-96 ' or other impervious areas to absorb or percolate associated pollutants; G. Retention Systems - ~rhere these systems are reguired, design shall include water and habitat Duality enhancement features; and 7. Construction Practices - construction site Best Management Practi:~es (BMPs) identified in the Palm Beach County 208 Plan shall be employed to minimize surface water pollution during dev- elopmnt and construction. The application of the above LDRs will insure that the development of proposed 92-1 Amendment projects will be completed in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 1 J 3-97 D. P01'ABLE WATER DATA AND ANALYSIS Potable water use projections for proposed Amendment 92-1 properties are presented in TABLE 17. Projected average and maximum daily flow ' calculations for the Village are presented on page 6.4-12 of the 1989 Support Documentation. Revisions to the in-text table are presented on the following table based on the revised population projections contained in this document. Average Daily Maximum Daily Year Population Flow (MGD)* Flow (MGD)* 1986 12,468 1.64 2.43 1999 14-,322 14,124 -1-~8Q 1.86 -x.-80- 2.76 1999 }47984 14,898 -1-94 1.96 z.-83- 2.91 ^esident population x 131.7 gallons per day Resident population x 195.5 gallons per day The above table indicates that the average and maximum daily potable water demand projections for 1999 will be reduced by approximately 1.5% as a result of proposed 92-1 Amendments. Further, 1999 average and maximum daily demand is projected to increase by approximately ' 2.6%. As a result, capacity requirements within the Seacoast Util- ities Authority system are essentially similar to those projected in the 1989 Support Documentation. According to Seacoast Utilities Authority staff, existing treatment facilities have a combined capacity of 29.0 MGD. Current demand (i.e. July, 1991) is 17.392 MGD and future commitments total 1.566 MGD. Total existing and committed capacity therefore amounts to 18.958 MGD or 65% of existing capacity. TABLF, 12 indicates that max- imum daily f;ow from proposed Amendments 92-1.2, 92-1.3, 92-1.4, 92-1.5 and 92-1.8 is projected to be 0.0892 MGD in 1994 and 0.].996 MGD in 1999. (Note: Proposed amendments 92-1.1, 92-1.6 and 92-1.7 are currently being served by Seacoast Utilities Authority facilities.) based of the above -nalysis, it is concluded that Seacoast Utilities Authority has adequate capacity to serve the 92-1 Amendments. ~~ 3-48 1'A BLE 17 POTABLE WATER DEMAND CALCULATIONS POPULATION AVG. DAILY DEMAND (Gal) PEAK DEMAND (Gal) AMENDMENT 1994 1999 1999 I 1999 I 1999 2 1"999 2 92-1.1 476 976 97,124 47,124 69,972 69,972 92-1.2 191 255 13,959 25,295 20,727 37,465 92-1.3 90 439 8,910 92,966 13,230 63,798 92-1.4 236 302 23,369 29,898 39,692 49,394 92-1.5 137 369 13,563 36,036 20,139 53,508 92-1.6 125 125 12,375 12,375 18,375 18,375 92-1.7 NA NA 9,7593 4,7593 7,0664 7,0664 92-1.8 3 3 297 297 441 941 TOTAL 1,208 1,959 124,351 198,700 184,642 295,039 ' Footnutes: 1 population x 99 gallons/capita/day 2 population x 147 gallons/capita/day 3 acres x 1,874 gallons/acre/day 4 acres x 2,782 gallons/acre/day Source: Land Research Management, Inc. (10/91) (NO'T'E: Total Village potable water flow projections, as per page 3-98, include both residential and non-residential flow expressed on a per capita basis. Flow projections. on the above table are components of the total flow figures utilized on ,page 3-48.) 1 3-99 7`he Village's Concurrency Management System will assure that adequate potzble water facilities and capacity are available concurrent with ' any development impacts resulting from the proposed 92-1 Amendments. E. NATURAL GROUNi~WATER AQUIFER RECHARGE No impacts upon natural groundwater aquifer recharge in the Village are :anticipated as a result of the proposed 92-1 Amendments for the following reasons: (1) septic tank and individual well installations within new developments in the defined Urban Service Area are expressly prohibited by the 1989 Comprehensive Plan; and (2) none of the properties that are the subject of proposed Amendment 92-1 are .located within wellfield Zones 1, 2, or 3 as defined by the Palm Reach County Wellfield protection Ordinance. F. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Proposed Amendment 92-1 is consistent with the Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage,- Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element of Comprehensive Plan and no text amendments ' are proposed. 1 3-50 3.6 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ' A. DATA SUMMARY Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments 92-1.1, 92-1.2, 92-1.3 and 92.1-5 have direct access to tidal waters of the North Palm Beach Canal and Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW) , and thus are considered to have potential impacts on the coastal area. Amendments 92-1.2, 92-1.3 and 92-1.5 are undeveloped properties that may support existing mangroves. Mangroves located along the western shores of the ICWWW-North Palm Beach Waterway, represent one of the last remaining undisturbed wetland areas in the Village located out- side the boundaries of MacArthur Beach State Park. Amendment 92-1.2, which includes the annexation of additional waterfront property, includes a 8.6-acre internal canal system with proposed bulkheads. Amendment 92-1.1 includes a private marina reserved exclusively for ' the use of property owners of Twelve Oaks; therefore, it will not be included in the inventory of Marinas and Boating Facilities in TABLE 7-1 (page 7-6) of the Support Documentation, although it is noted as a water-related land use. B. ANALYSIS The Coastal Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan includes a discussion of land use, natural resources, estuarine pollution, natural disaster planning (hurricane evacuation and post-disaster redevelopment), beach and dune systems, public access and infra- structure in the coastal zone. The proposed land use for each Amendment is discussed in the Future band Use section of this document. A discussion of natural resources in-Planning Area 6A, the primary area in the Village impacted by the proposed annexations, is contained in the 1989 Support Documentation, including the identification of mangroves. None of the proposed 3-51 Amendments includes a water-related resource that affects the inventory in the 1989 Support Documentation. 1'he addition of Twelve Oaks (Amendment 92-1.1) will add 976 residents ' to the estimate of 5,965 persons who reside within the storm surge vulnerable zones areas .east of U.S. 1). The annexation of Twelve Oaks will increase the number of Village residents who may require public shelter by 85 persons. None of the proposed Amendments affect infrastructure in the coastal high-hazard areas, public access to beaches or post-disaster redev- elopment concerns. 7'he proposed internal canal system of Amendment 92-1.2 (Prosperity Harbor North) has been designed to promote flushing to tidal waters, and represents an improvement to the dead-end finger canals charac- teristic of residential waterfront development in the Village. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ' The proposed 92-1 Amendments are consistent with the Coastal Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and no additional text amendments are proposed. 3-52 3.7 CONSERVATION A. DATA SUMMARY Amendment 92 1.2 represents the only undeveloped proposed annexaticn to the Village that is considered to have a potential significant impact on resources or issues addressed by the Conservation Element. Amendment 92-1.1 (Twelve Oaks) includes a private marina with access to the north end of Lake Worth. B. ANALYSIS The Conservation Element contains a discussion of natural resources, the estuarine system, wetlands, wildlife habitats, soils, hazardous waste concerns and water needs in the Village. The land uses proposed in-the 92-1 Amendments are similar in type and impact to existing development in the Village. Amendment 92-1.1 includes an existing private marina and its incorporation into the Village will not impact existing estuarine conditions. Amendment 92-1.2 (Prosperity Harbor North) includes a circular internal canal system that promotes tidal flushing. Impacts to the estuarine system, wetlands and wildlife habitats will be addressed by federal, state and local agencies prior to the devel- opment. The proposed 92-1 Amendments do not affect the soil characteristics of the Village, nor do they affect hazardous waste disposal or sign- ificantly affect water needs in the Village. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES The proposed 92-1 Amendments are deemed consistent with the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and no additional text amendments are proposed. 3-53 3.8 RECKEATION AND OPEN SPACE ' A. DATA SUMMARY R'he proposed Comprehensive Plan 92-1 Amendments have no effect on the data summary presented in the 1989 Support Documentation.- .'rt. ANALYSIS TABLE 18 presents recreation and open space demand projections at buildout for the proposed 92-1 Amendmnt properties. The cumulative effects of proposed 92-1 Amendments on the demand for and supply of rec:~eatio:i and open space facilities are presented on TABLE 19, which is a revision of TABLE 9-4 (page 9-19) of the 1989 Support Documentation. TABLE 19 has been revised to reflect 1991 revised buildout demand u:;ing population estimates and projections presented in the Future Land Use Element of this document. The cumulative effects of proposed 92-1 Amendments result in no change to the buildout demand for additional recreation and open space facilities as indicated on TABLE 19; however, prop;~sed Amendment 91-2.5B will add an additional 5.00 acres of neighborhood park supply. As a result, the previously de'ined additional demand for one acre of neighborhood park is more than adeguately met. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES I~roposed Amendment 92-1 is consistent with the Recreation/Open Space Element of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, and no additional text amendments are proposed. L 3-59 .~ ~i m ~r In r rn .o [n r rn rn r m N rn r F• W 6~ O r N O O r N N N M M ~ N r ~•~............. E• !`"~ O O O O O o O O O O O O U W U O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .-~ I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N H Ol .~J b w lD rl U1 N O [Il N O O 1l1 N N N N M H .~ N O O O O O O O O O O O O O .7 1 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O rn f~ a w E- N to .. c ul .. .. v' [n In [n r [o o [n -+ r M o .-, 0 0 0 0 o b ~ o o ., o o w I $, N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O E• q rn 2 7 ~] W P >] P U Q O O O N C[' .-, O N P Q ~{ [O ~ ql ~y. ] ~-, ~O M O O O O O O O O O O O Q I U N O O O O p O O O O p O p O O p m q '!. Q M W ~: l0 M .-• r !O .+ .r ~i W lD l0 O+ r N [D a w -+ m v o .+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. o 0.l C] I •Q N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O E k] O~ U Q ^. N ~' [O N O .-~ O O O O O O O O O O w N p O O p O O O p O O p o p O O LL O, O ~_ O V r N O1 OJ N N O1 OD O~ r O OD O~ r F 1 R N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 41 O~ C V w [r. U [// ro v ~ ,.~ •y „ ~ u o [, ro x c .c Y a .i .o ., „ ~'' 3a O .-I Y N N ro .-. .-. rn ., a u m .~ v v a tr w a a o .u u .l ro u' ro u o a -., .. ro v a a ., o ,., ro ,. ' ~ o E: v v m .~ o .-I ro m o a v .. w .c >• >ti u ., o ~ o ~ r. .. i, ,~ a rn ro .. w .. a ro E, o -.. m m rn o c n v .~ .-. ~ .~ ., ., o .o ,-+ .o a u ro c v -.. In Y .-I ro v N v ro al .l ~, a .c a .c c .., E: -~ v w .o .-~ v ., n +, rn m ~+ b, E u --, n w E a x w N N V Ol 'O a ~ .+ U -.+ C; N N ro ti ..~ C [~ a UI -.~ U •.i O O ro N Q N O U1 b O O 3 N r0 .C b W O W l0 U •-1 O .. '/. U Rl k: fA C7 [n F W W W ~- to ~ x ~ M > 3-55 v ~~ rn ~, G7 a 0.l Z F' v N L] t. -r1 I 1 1 P: U I 1 I I 1 ~ 1 1 I 1 I W H '-i ~ ~~ [L ~~ r n III W M z H I I 1 I .I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~.1 1 1 Q Z - (Z W 2 n: o a c ~ N N N N N N N N M O 2 U M ~l N N U1 N N N ~ 1~ ~ 'O b J-1 N N .-i ~ 4 N Ul O) ,-~ a a ro .--~ N N N ,-I •-I U ro 1-1 ,i W Ll l to la -.-I •.1 E~ O a a s 01 N a v a cYl H a uu E~roo oooo•.+•~losao ~ ~ H mm NN.c avuvwwvrou 1i ~ ti O o 00 00 Vl N Ol .-l lfl lfl N N M N cT N ('St U [a. N N .{I H !] W I Ca Q N N N N N N N N N N O W C7 £ .-I N U1 v N N N 1~ 1/ l~ b 'O 1~ N~ G O I W H N 7~ .-, CL C1. Ul ,-, 1-t N N .--~ •-~ 3-I m N O .~ Q Z U U -`I -~ E H O a a a N Gl a N a -,-~ c cn w mro E.+mo oooo•.+-~+ouo „ o a a N 1J ,G av v vww v ro v N N a NINI ~ Ul N Ol .--11t1 1~1 N N N N M N 7 m r+ U ¢' . i M M ui~ O 7 v >, cu cu a °• O~ `~ N O ~ N N N N N N N y a , N N U1 N N N N 1~-I N N b~ ly-I N 3~-1 QGj ~ w Q ~ v m •-, a a. v a z ~. s. •.+-.+ E.-+ o a a a.v v a v a •o a w W .+~ vv E.~mo oooo•.~•~losao •,~ o ~ v Hal roro N11.C avvvwwvrov m •o y ~ E P H P ISO ~MN00 .-iN W l0 V' Na0 V'Ifl yOj '~ ~ M X O ~ N t` .-1 M .--I '-1 co W cn .-~ ~ A 6~ / 0 ~ .-1 W O C n~ 'i W N O z O It 'U N q O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 O Op '^ - ~ T . ti p 0 ~! 1 0 o O l l l O o u 1 0 o O o O p i N ~ ~ H O O N 0 1f1 ~ N 1f) l!1 N N 00 0 0 N .}I U1 .-{ ~ ~O ~ la ~' I ~-] •--1 .--I .-i ul N O .-1 N N ~O 1~ d' l0 . t` •--~ !T H ao a, ro °;-°'E °: o a a a w w a m a +' o • ~ Q M ), ll 1~ N WI w o~ uv -~+-+roo oooo•.~•.+oNo n: zH NN eNN.c a.vvvwwuro V G +' ~ o G o W H 7 O ~ .-~ .~ .-1 rn .--1 .-/ .--1 r-/ .--1 r-1 .-I .-1 .-i O .-~ N (L' fn ;~ N N ~ „ N ~ ~ ~ H N N O ~, r, N N i~ u .-~ 1~ ~ A AN ~ H a H ro u e H A N a 'O G O a U J-I U CT G 'O N r~ •U rt N 2 'O W U U . m c ?'. N O O ro E N N [x F~ O W Z O z N Z .--~ ro U] N I4M .-+ U/ E 'O a sa O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~U .-. q O) G .U-. la ~ ~ a r CP ro A .-~ .~ .-~ G m q a G. O -~ H N N CPO H G A v g '-' '~ a A ~ N 0 ~ ' H A G K Ol m G U Q -•1 N .V ti m m ro 0 Jv cn L a W s: G •.i W E •rl N W A A A tr~ W N >•~ rn U x cn to E a U •.i t~ w a E G .X w N +-I ro ?~ ~ ~+ a ?~ ~, a: ~1 •.i E U N 41 N -~ U -rl G N a N O G ro ~-+ ~+ +' ~ O Q,~ vo alrooo 3alro~rooro~o a ~ n ~ n.u zc~ ~ w~alc~ ~ cnHwNmwxa> u ,-1 N M 9-14 3-56 ' 3.9. INTERGOVERNMENTAh COORDINATION A. DATA SUMMARY The proposed Comprehensive Plan 92-1 Amendments have no effect on the data summary presented in the 1989 Support Documentation. B. ANALYSIS The proposed 92-1 Amendments have no effect on the analysis presented in the 1989 Support Documentation. Further, none of the proposed amendments are located within a designated area of Critical State Concern. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES The Proposed 92-1 Amendments are consistent with the Intergovenmental Coordination Element of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan: F30WEVER, based on the Traffic Circulation section of this document, ' a policy should be added to cooperate with the City of Palm Beach Gardens to identify contributing impacts on Burns Road and RCA Boulevard and any related future improvements needs and responsibilities. 1 3-57 3.10 CAPITAI. IMPROVEMENTS A. DAT:. SUMMARY ' The proposed Comprehensive Plan 92-1 Amendments have no effect on the data summary presented in the 1989 Support Documentation. The element-by-element review of the Comprehensive Plan presented in Sections 3.1 - 3.9 did not idec:tify any additional capital improve- ment requirements that need to be included. B. ANALYSIS The proposed 92-1 Amendments have no effect on the analysis presented in the 1989 Support Documentation. Further, a review of the Capital Improvements Elements will be performed by the Village during Fiscal Year 1992. At that: time, a complete revision of the previous analyses will be accomplished. C. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Based on the analyses prepared in this document, proposed 92-1 Amend- ' ments will not res~ilt in the need to implement additional capital expenditures to: (1) correct existing deficiencies; (2) accommodate future growth; or (3) r~.place obsolete facilities. Accordingly, the Village Consulting Engineer has stated that areas annexed into the Village can be incorporated within the proposed Master Drainage Study at no additional cost. Further, the approval of proposed Amendment 92-1.5B eliminates the need for an additional one acre of neighbor- hood park at buildout. Proposed 92-1 Amendments are consistent with the Inter- goven?nental Coordination Element of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, and no additional text amendments are proposed. 1 3-58 ' ~.0 CONSISTENCY WITfI REGIONAL AND STATE PLANS Accorriing to Chal•ter 9J-5.021, Florida Administrative Code, the Village's Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 187.201, Florida Statutes and the Treasure Coast Regional Plannina Council Regional Policy Plan. Chapter 9J-5.021(2), Florida Administrative Code states that..."for the purposes of determining consistency of the local plan with the State Comprehensive Plate or appropriate'comprehensive regional policy plan the state or regional plan shall be construed as a whole and no specific ;oal and policy shall be c~~nstrued or applied in isolation from the other goals and policies." 9.1 REGIONAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Proposed 92-1 Amendments were Yeviewed in terms of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Regional Policy Plan in order to determine ' consistency. Based on this review, it is determined that no signif- icant regional issues are related to proposed 92-1 Amendments and that they should be found consistent with regional goals and policies. 4.2 STATE PLAN CONSISTENCY Goals of the State Comprehensive Plan are listed in TABLE 1-1 of the Village's 1989 Comprehensive Plan. A review of the proposed 92-1 Amendments with respect to these goals results in the conclusions that thew should be found consistent with State goals and policies. 9-1 APPENDIX: AMENDMENT NPBCP 92-1 ~ihe fol~_o~ring amendments to the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan (NPBCP) are structured to: (1) update the Compre%,ensive Plan to incorporate Village annexation actions; and (2) update the Comprehensive Plan to permit development proposals. The following list of amendments is included herein: Amendment Designation 92-1.1 Twelve Oaks Annexation and Map Amendment 92-1.2 Prosperity Harbor North Annexation, Text and Map Amendment 92-1.3 Sanctuary Bay Text and Map Amendment 92-1.9 Sanctuary Cove Text and Map Amendment 92-1.5A Prosperity Harbor South Text and Map Amendment 92-1.5B Village Park 92-1.6 Fisherman~s Village Annexation and Map Amendment 92-1.7 First Unitarian Church Annexation and Map Amendment 92-1.8 Dean Property Annexation and Map Amendment In addition to the above, three amendments to the Future An;1":ation Areas map (Figure 3-17, page 3-°E) cf th= Future Land Use Element are included: These amendments are included to delete two parcels which have been annexed by the City of Palm Beach Gardens and include one parcel which was previously ommitted in error from the Village of North Palm Beach Future Annexation Area. Both r.he text: and map series amendments are included on the. pages that follow. This entire Appendix shall be incorporated within the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan as APPENDIX Bl: Amendment NPBCP 92-1. 1 B-1 ' The future Land Use Element of the Village of North Palm Beach Compre;;ensive Plan shall be amended by adding page 3-11A, which reads as follows: Special Policy 5 8• Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.2 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a max- imum of 98 residential units. Special Policy 5 9• Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1 3 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 232 units. Special Policy 5 10• Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.9 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 189 units. ' Special Policy 5.11• Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.5A on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 108 units. REV: Amendment 92-1 3-11A 1 B-2 'I'lie Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Village of North ' Palm Be:,ch Comprehensive Plan shall be amended by adding Policy 1.10, which shall read as follows: Policy 1.10: By FY 1992 the Village shall coordinate with the~City of Palm_Beach Gardens in an effort to iointly identify contributing impacts upon Burns Road and RCA Boulevard and define any future improvements needs and responsibilities i 1 B-3 1 The Future Land Use Map Series of the Future Land Use Element of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan shall be amended by incorporating revised FIGURES 3-1, 3-3, 3-10, 3-12, 3-13A, 3-19, 3-15, 3-16 and 3-17. 1 1 B-9 / ~p N 1 x U a w ~ - M W a N W n ¢¢ m (7 z K 6 ~ 'z W H W W m r ~ a z a a ~ ~ C7 a = ~ a a ~ as W ~ _ °' zi o Z W ' ~~ ~ m ~ o a ~ GEAH rL ~ i . a ~ LpHt'C p a pS J = ~ i ' _ .:_! ~ p _ ~' i~ .,.j=~~ry :zr-'r ..~ we ~ 1 i - r- _. - - ~, /_... ,~ ,--' ~; :O J~'E iii ~ ~ ~ i\ iii 1 I ~ 1 ~' G ii~/ U V N ~i~ _~,- ~.~ " ~ , (~ a j 3 ~ t _ i (~ I If _~ ,.!' ~_.~ -- ~. ~•iii = iir~~i~•'~01•ai• 1 (/ ~~ N ~ l0 _~ ~T N --- _I-r_r- ,N _ _ -~#~ d _ ~ / v ,/ . ~ °' / E E ~ ~~ ,a /~ v ~ ~ e~ E .~~~ E Q ~ = Q a J,i o. ~ I / m ~ ~ ~ I I ,~~ /~~ (i .1; ,, '~~~f N C a E v C a~ E Q ~. ro r ~ .i ~ N+~ ~, #k c u E v c v 2 t0 N O, v E v v E a a v w w z N 1 1 1 3-16 ~- J PGA BLVD. :-. ,~.. ~\ NET ROAD i '~ FIGURE 3-3 92-1.1 7WEWE OAKS 31.2 Acres !97 Units 17-SF 54-Duplex 12d~1F R-2(Cty) to RH(N.P.S J : ` ~,.. S`. s~y <.:.~: ~ ~~ . .v. i' ~ r ~fish .kkYf. {]>j +Y~3 r: ~I~ ~ YN"i\~l ~'' ~.~ ;:. i..x ~/~ 1 ~I~, 4 ./~ \ ~I - ~~I NORTH PALM C3EAC1-I FLOn~a O 200 800 ~1LJIr FEET e='" KEY: Corporatt knit --------- Planning Area Boundary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1'and 3-2 - Refer to Special Policy 5.2 ~• •• •• - Anendaent Boundary . . . . .. ^; Y~ M4P MIENDMENiS ~ 92-1.1 -Twelve Oaks O ~ ~~ "= ti n,~~{s:: ~Y~s ~. i "a{M , ~'. ~'~ FUTURE LAND USE MAP ~ta: ~~, x ~~~'~~ '> '• ~ FUTURE LAND USE ~~ j.. ~ t ; sr ~ n?~:} ~ \~\C\ `~"~~~~~`H~~t?,? '; MAP SERIES F~\~~~~W ~~~`,~h\~ ' "a '. 1999 I ~~'~1;~\`~'~~~\\) ~; PLANNING AREA 2 IY1~~. ,`\\ \ i~,'I, `,`~ ``~~ I~ , ,~ 1\ i \ ' ,,~/ \ ~I \ ~I 'NT,,,~~/~, \ ,,I ,''U Hq c O z ~~,r' \ \ I . ~ ~. (1 ~ ~ \ •• ~~ ~•"n~u nn ni` SOURCE: LPof, Inc. B-6 Rev: MenA~znt 92-1 FIGURE 3-10 .,.r,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_ KEY ~ ~ = Corporate linit __ = 1 92-1.2 ~ : Plmning Area Boundary -•••r••••••.......r 1 PROSPERITY HARBOR NORTH ~ ; Refer to Land Use Tables 3-I and 3-2 ~ 33.4 Acres ~ ~ Refer to Special Policy 5.3 ••..•. ~ 98 SF Units ~ : AnenlSaent Boundary . . . ~ ~ R-3(Cty) to RL(N.P.B) ~ _ 1 ...... . . ,. MAP AMENIIMENTS - ~r .... --\ y_,11,n„nu 92-1.2 -Prosperity Harbor North ~~rl~r 92-1 3 -S t B . uary anc ay 7lnnll,n,,. -r~~ - 'Q: 92-1.4 -Sanctuary Cove ,Ill, r,. 92-1.SA -Prosperity Harbor South 92-1.58 -Village Park - - ~ 1 YONET A 1 t6ewwiw~~~ Inf-- --------?'- ~' c~ ; °g~pg'e •• ` ~ 9 ~, n 2-1.3 ,? I _ SANCTUARY BAY ?~? ~ a ~::. ~ ~. 9 ~ ; ~'~ ~ I - ~ : . _ S 29.8 Acres 3~x ~"`~ . n I = ~. ' 232 MF Units f>~ io ~*. 'gyp ~ „ r. .. ~ RURH to ki ' y~ > o + yy ~y ~`~'•.~~ " 7 ~ .C . 92 1 4 . , ~ ` SANCTUARY COVE k ~ ? . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 15 3 Acres i s ~_ ,. .. `.. ° ..• 164 NF Units 't ;~; ri' " " ~ . 9 ~ RL io RH '; RL `' < :n ' i ~9 ~ ' r Y" t _ :~o~.~ "s :, O • `''~d ~r~l' ='~•%"=^ ~ PROSPERITY HARBOR SOUTN "' ' ~ ~ ~ - . c. '• ~ r „ ; 63.47 Acres ~.:: ~~ 1 1 ~' ~ FUTURE LAND USE MAP L `L' FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 0' ;: ~ 1999 -I' ~? PLANNING AREA 6A ~' ~ ~~..o,~,~~ ' V Vb NORTH PALM EMRR I DROSPERITY _ ~7.Il hrn C/p1 la ae$ : MARFIOR f EiE:ACN FIORI~A _ - •~ ~ ~~ T m .. n nnrnnnn n,rnr , ~ SOURCE: LRH , ]nc. a ~ 0 200 800 0 1 Rev: ,AaenAlent 92-1 ~ FEET B-7 FIGURE 3-12 FUTURE LAND USE MAP ¢ ~' FUTURE LAND USE 1= MAP SE111ES ~= 1999 ~=.,~ PLANNING AREA 7 4=°' T ~fli'iii7 :.. KEY: Corporate linit --------- Planning Area Boundary """"""""" Refer to Land Use Tablts 3-1 and 3-2 Refer to Special Policy 5.2 •••••• Anendaent Boundary ~.. ~. ~.. NAP ANENDt1FMS 92-1.6 - Fishernan's Village 92-1.7 -First Unitarian Church 92-1.8 - Vacani Residential Lot RM NORTH PALM BEACH F~oaion 210 8i0 101 o FEET SOURCE: LRN, Inc. Reu; AnenAaent 92-1 ~: 92-1.B VACANT RESIDENTIAL 1 0.35 Acres R-5(Cty) to RL(N.P.B.) 92-1.6 FISHEIEtAN'S VILIABE _ 6.5 Acres PBG 48-Duplex Units R-5(Cty.) to RH(N.P.B) Fifi7iiL' y 92-1.6 '~~-1.7 r 92-1.7 'qt ~ ,~~ 'FIRST 1N11ARlAN CHURCH i^ 2.54 Acres R-5(Cty) to OPF(N.P.B.) I3- 8 ~ ~ 2 W N ~ _ a N W m J m OC N Q W p ~`'~ 3 < a J a r z a ~ a x ~ pz M E=O m o: W ~a ~ o O Z ~ NF- ~ w~ a LL O ~ > W .I > J W W ll. ¢J j Q ~F ~y 5 LL J = a O j O .i Q' .~ N O~ # .x~ a.1 ~ .~- "J ~i OCEAN .~ ~ - "~ ~ AZ~ANt,G ~ . % ~ ~- i ' ~~ ~P---~- 3p ~w 1 ~./. 3.'~ ~~ ~y'~iY.S. \V ~ / i \, N 5~' ./f: ~ ~ NCI i ~CP~N 8 r yt 4 Y ga ~~` ~~! .i N ~f N C N E C v E Q a ro M ~ .. - Y .-1 S W O ~N O~ O ~ # C7 ~ LL m .... t) -G c: m ~' a u E ~ N v C J C) w 4 ~ o. w ro w / g N I ~ .-1 1 ~ N i ' ~ . N ~ ~~ y ~ C ,~ ~' ~ E v °- E c ' ~ ~ r. C' ~ 4 e a a ro a ~ ro 1 I~ t~1;I 2~1~' ,s~3 "1~:1 ~~.:5 !~3~c me j~~ii er is •~i ~:ia:'s 3-28 B-9 .i N 1~ C N E G N Q a U W a 1 e~ K. ~ ~ i 1 cn cn w = w ~ a ~ W Q ~ ~ r a~~ i M F=-~W ltl ~ Q = LL ~ U Q ppEpN ~ _ __.~ i (7 ~ J PTIpµS\C /" ~w ~ ~ >> __~ ~ ~ e-~ H ~~ H i N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ x ~ ~ rn ~ w ~ J~_ CI ~ `'~E ~oPtN ~ W v _ v ~ [n , - C n. __ ~~ w _ ~ y ~ j a ~ f U'/ ~. ~ ~ ~~y .a•a'C1 ~ ~- o J i N lp [~ I I I N N ~ N ~ ~ ' ~' . # ~k / N # N y ~ ~ y C ~ ~~ ~ C N W `~ E E ~ E c __ v v ~ v,_ c c E c w ~ ~ ~ ¢ Q c 'a v a a a a ~ ~ ro ~ / ~ p, ~" ro r ~i N F.' E G1 E P. U fA a z v a 3-33 I3-10 Amendment #92-1.2 ~" Amendments ~'' #92-1.6,#92-1 #92-1.8 Amendment #92-1.1 Y~ r Z .~ ) O I6 2 KEY: 1. ARENT3ronaAN LAND COMrLE7O 7, CANAVERALfuneAnunocourux) SCALE: 1 In./7000 it. 2. QUARTZIPS AMMENTS B. COC OAIU)IEAN LAND COMrLC%) ' 3. URDAN LAND 9, BASINGER,FINE SAND ~. TIDAL SYlAMP IO.RIVIERAIuneAN uno coMr~[x) '3. BEACHES 11. BASINGERtuneAN lAMO co~r~cx) E3. PALM BEACHt~neAN iANO eourl[A) FIGURE 3-15 GENERALIZED SOILS MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP DIES SOURCE: PALM BEACH COUNTY AREA PLANNING BOARD, 1978 Rev.: NPBCP Amen~lmnnt. Q2_7 3-34 B-11 D 1 1 ~ w a a w w ~ ~ Q 4. A Q 1 _ O ~ t- W M Q W X W ~ Z Z Z ~ Q J LL W W a ~ F a u- ll. 4 O 4 L m w ~ A d d m w C A~ a dV L v d n ~N .. .r y rv V ~.~ i G E ~ ~~ O m m o >. d F Z v -+ m „~ m W 9 0 N d G ~ O O 9 .a d T. W C > d d i N ,y d A T E 4 m v X 4 4 0. 3t d O G F C J 4 41 V S: d O q v ~ ~ r G W d d S' [a 4 4~ U a w <m G J Q a x H O z LL O w a J_ I a w Q 2 O H a x w 2 z a of W J 3-38 P. - 1 2 a N t ~ N O ~ d r ~ C ~ O E v v ~ e a~ o ~ 'E ~ a a a U U W m a 0. z 0 6 _ ,.c AN x o ' a 0 0 m w J U 4) m n m 1 r-1 N Q~ }1 Zi Q~ E a P U a, a: 1 i a 3-36 B-13 w F- ~ ~ z LL w F. .G APPENDIX: AMENDMENT NPBCP 92-1 ' the fol~_owing amendments to the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan (NPBCP) are structured to: (1) update the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate Village annexation actions; and (2) update the Comprehensive Plan to permit development proposals. The following list of amendments is included herein: Amendment Designation 92-1.1 Twelve Oaks Annexation and Map ,Amendment 92-1.2 Prosperity Harbor North Annexation, Text and Map Amendment 92-1.3 Sanctuary Bay Text and Map Amendment 92-1.4 Sanctuary Cove Text and Map Amendment 92-1.SA Prosperity Harbor South Text and Map Amendment 92-1.58 Village Park 92-1.6 Fisherman's Village Annexation and Map Amendment 92-1.7 First Unitarian Church Annexation and Map Amendment ' 92-1.Q Dean Property Annexation and Map Amendment In addition to the above, three amendments to the Future An~1~;:atio.~ Araas map (Figure 3-17, page ?-cE) cf the Future Land Use Element are included: These amendments are included to delete two parcels which have been annexed by the City of Palm Beach Gardens and include one parcel which was previously ommitted in error from the Village of North Palm Beach Future Annexation Area. Both the text; and map series amendments are included on the pages that follow. This entire Appendix shall be incorporated within the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan as APPENDIX B1: Amendment NPBCP 92-1. B-1. to contaminate land and water resources by requiring said businesses to notify the Palm Beach County Department of ' Environmental Resources Management regarding the storage, use grid/or disposal of potentially hazardous or toxic substances. The program shall be implemented by the Village through the annual renewal of occupational licenses. Further, the Village shall, by l'Y 1990, adopt the Palm Beach County Wellfield Protection ordinance. Policy 2_3: The Village shall encourage, ttrrough its participation on the Seacoast Utilities Authority Governing Board, protection of potable water wellfields by regulatory authorities having land use jurisdiction in aquifer recharge areas serving Seacoast Utilities Authority systems. , T Policy 2.4: The clearing of any wetlands vegetation or land assigned a Conservation Land Use Category on the Future Land Use Map Series a€-F#gure-~-l~B shall not be approved by the Village until such time that appropriate permits have been procurred, by the developer, from the Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management or Health Departments and~er the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. Policy 2_5: At the time of each required Comprehensive Plan update, initially in FY 1994, the Village shall consider the need for the identification, designation and protection of additional historically significant properties under the provisions of the Rev: NPBCP Amendment 92-1. Standard Housing Code. 3-7 B1A ' Special Policv_5_4: Require all new developments in Planning Areas 1 and 6A to perform an environmental assessment to define potential impacts upon the viability of vegetative species and/or tabitats delineated on Figures 3-13II and C. The impact assessment shall include necessary techniques and/or controls to maintain ;species and/or habitats in their current condition ~r mitigate potential impacts. Further, r.e uire a.ll_new developments in Planning Areas 1 and 6A to perform topographic surveys as a means of deter- minina current flood hazard potential and defining flood prevention measures. ' Special Policy 5.5: Formally incorporate a Future Annexation ' Area Map as part of ttre Future Land Use Map Series. Further, an Annexation Policy, as per Policy 1.4; IN2'ERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION element shall be prepared. Special Policy 5.6: As a means of enhancing the commercial character of the area along Northlake Boulevard through renovation and/or redevelopment, adopt, by FY 1990, a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPU D) ordinance allowing proposed projects to depart from the strict interpretations of the Zoning Code if, after review by the Village, it is found that said projects are in compliance with the North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Special Policy 5_7: By FY 1991, investigate alternatives available to assure that sea grass beds adjacent to the Village, t in the area south of Planning Area 1 (i.e, within the City of Riviera Beach) are not developed in a manner that is detrimental to the Iakc Worth estuarine system and related ecosystems. 3-11 Rev: NYBCP Amendment 92-1 B1B The Future Land Use Element of the Village of North Palm Beach ' Comprehensive Plan shall be amended by adding page 3-11A, which reads as follows: Special Policy 5.8: Residential development On the property defined by Amendment 92-1.2 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a max- imum of 98 residential units. ~ecial Policy 5.9: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.3 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 232 units. Special Policy 5.10: Residential development, on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.9 on revised FIGURE 3 10 shall be limited to a maximum of 189 units. Special Yolicv 5.11: Residential development on the property defined ' by Amendment 92-1.5A on revised FIGURE 3 10 shall be limited to a maximum of 108 units. Special Policy 5.12: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1 1 on Revised Figure 3-3 shall be limited to the existing 197 residential units Special Policy 5.13: Residential development On the property definec, by Amendment 92 1.6 on Revised Figure 3 12 shall be limited to the existing 98 residential units REV: Amendment 92-1 3-11A B-2 ' OUJECTIVF,__5; Conserve .and }~abitats. Policy 5.1: By FY 1.990, 5-101 of the Village's Code more specifically define the of the ordinance, including, protect fish and wildlife and their expand Chapter 5, Article IV, Section of Ordinances (Marine Sanctuary) to intent and jurisdictional applications fisheries and manatee protection. Policy 5.2: By Fy 1999, determine the historical existence of Manatees within Village waterways and mortality rates related thereto. Pending the results of the above analyses meet with the Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR) and the Palm Beach Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management to determine if additional protective measures are required. Further, ' upon completion of the Manatee Protection program for Palm Beach County, incorporate pertinent control measures within the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Rev: NPBCP Amendment 92-1 ~}-~> Add: 1 ] /1/f19 B2A The Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the Village of North Yalm Be:,ch Cn~mprehensibe Pi.an shall be amended by adding Policy 1.10, ' which shall read as follows: Policy 1.10: By FY 1992 the~Village shall coordinate with Lhe City of Palm Beach Gardens in an effort to 'ointl identif contributin impacts upon Burns Road and RCA Boulevard and define any future improvements needs and responsibilities 1 B-3 'Phe Future L , and Use Map Series of the Future Land Use Element of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan shall be amended by incorporating revised FIGURES 3-1, 3-3, 3-10, 3-12, 3-13A, 3-14, 3-15, 3-16 and 3-17. 1 1 13-4 ~ p ----- N Q W N U tt a a N ~ W O W a r' J z N m m ~ a a a J ~3 ~ M a ~ a = a ~ as w lY U N 2 Z O a D ~ _. Z m o (_} {y = rL ~ J J OCEAN ; _-_. ~ ~-- tW7 a ~ AS\'AKS\C ' ~~' = - -- J Y ~ ~ J H 1- / ,. > O LL ~ 1 / /l/ • .x.14 _ :. r /~-~ ~ ~ \ ;: _, i .~ N f ~.L \,. ~' III •. Jr~~a~-~ II• ~ I ~~' f i /i•.. ~OPZN I III .U /~E II ~ 1 ~~ E II~1r ~\\I'r I~ _ . i 11 t 66 I _ ~ i I I II I\11 ~ ~ III r / `~ yI II• I I ~.,, ~~ I •ii i ~ ~~{~ Zf+ N (/ ~ / 1-r_r- ,N ~ ~~ --~ _ J~ N # ~~' ~ F, ~ ~.. _ 1, ~ ~ J G v ~ ~/ ~ E c E ~,~ E ~~1 C E F .a1~ ~ E v ~ c E ~ ~ . - -,ice. < y ' 'Q d I / o. E a Q T ~ ~ ~ fl. ~ /. '. ~ S_' N C Ul E E a U r i d a 1 C 1 3-1G rc- PGA BLVD. t :\ FIGURE 3-3 ............. n ~1 ~.___..___ n u...r ~~ 92-1;1 TWELVE CWKS 31.2 Acres 197 Units 17-SF °~4-Duplex 126-t1f R-2(Cty) to RH(tJ.P.6.) ,...v;:: "fir' ~ 3j/.:~:>if.: may} ,r.~:..,, 2: ^C .: _.::. yjM . C /~ ., .. .. ., ,, -., .., ., ., NORTH PALM E3EACH r(an\w o zoo a;oo ~1L.1rJ FEET :.. ~ .. <::>;:z;<>s:~>:> ,....,: v<:.... :::~~''>:i:~>;':as::~ Corporate Im\t --------- s:„<:>.;~ Planning Area Boundary ••••••••••.•••••.. `::~":::::>; _ Refer to land Use cables 3-1 'and 3-2 >.:k::;. <:.:::: <>z«>;~ = Refer to Special Policy 5.2 .••... :;;~#":~"c. enl Boundary ... .. „~ ~ s^~ ~ ;~;vs~=~;;. ~~ MAP AHENDMENTs ~rs~~y?G~c: ~ 92-1 .1 -Twelve Oaks '~#>:~ tea>:':5x ~,.::a,~,i~,,.~bs i O ~~ -, y . u1~yyn~,pp W \' 11.ga ~ ~ ~~~~,,:.;3t; ~~ %~ ~ FUTURE LAND USE MAP ~a~r~~,~~.\(,,\,~Y~\,`~r~ ~;~~ FUTURE LAND USE y ?~.,\~t~jr~r~~ ~}~', MAP S E R I E S +\~ ~~d)~iY ~~\a~~ \\~\ 1999 c ~~~~~~~"^\,~~~'\\ ~ \\ ~~ PLANNING AREA 2 N\ld(`i\ .1`n i t .~ F \ \~~~` \ ''. ~ ~ \,.. ~ '•. . \ ~. .~ ~,yT9gC ~ e ~, \ ~\ `U O ~e, \ \ T,l~ W , ~,,, ` .~ r~, ~. ~', I R~q "'• )-' ~''•. •, ,, ~.lnnnau.i, avvnbli lNl\ lll(• Rev: laaendaent 92-1 B-6 FIGURE 3-10 ~' - ~~~ KEY• -1 92-1 2 /' Corporate linit ______ / _ --- = 1 PROSPERITY HARBOR NORTH Planning Area Boundary ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, / : Refer to Land Use cables 3-1 and 3-2 1 33.4 Acres / _ Refer to Special Policy 5,3 ...••. 1 98 SF Units / : Pnendeent Boundary 1 R-3(Cty) to RL(N.P,B) ~' ~ ~... . - 1 _ _ e _~ ~_~. ~ ~ ~ : t14P AMENDMENTS .,nn,- \ y:"""""" 92-1.2 -Prosperity Harbor North ~ -~ n +++ n ~i++~ 92-1.3 -Sanctuary Bay - +..... _ -""""_ ~= 92-1.4 -Sanctuary Cove ' ' 92-I.SA -Prosperity Harbor South 92-1.SB -Village Park < ass 1 - 1 SANCT BAY Y„<, ~<~;A ~ a 29.8 Acres SF~.2>w~(s2~i A a~. 9 1 _ 232 HF Units :>.. »?~ ~ :c'o ry i SANCTUARY CODE ~ ~., ~ "> 1 -,15.3 Acres r Y } ,~.~,~ •:3 ~ ;``>fiz~;' •~ 7Y n <$3 . ?: 'ltl4 HF Units >' s~~~'. ~~ ' ~~: ~T~, r `RL to RH t;4 ~:'<_' l`a~ .uy~~ .` 9``1 ~ ~ wnv 0 1 •. '.'. " !Y ~~~ CSC b `}•., _ ~' T rh :~ ~, Q , / < S<. ,r1' ~,>~ .. 921 SA >-,.: s #>y.~yti ,.., PROSPERITY HARBOR SOUTN ~. '[ > ~~' ~ 63.47 Acres ? r `[(( ~ ~ -~- `iR ~;. IOB SF Units <' - oI`:_.?. _.-. .s } ;RV1dt/RH to RL .~ ... ._ ' > < ~' - Ic FUTURE LAND USE MAP . ~, FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES _ ~; ""I,° 1999 _ ': ~~ - n ? •a~....~~..~'., PLANNING AREA 6A ..:... - +i-~.se - V~IUdEfF~X ~RO~VERITY NORTH PALM ~~12 k~^ H/qt l R HARBOR e OS r BEACH FL.O iiiw I I SOURCE: Lkt, Inc. ~ O 20 0 e O 1 0 Rev: ,A~enA+ent 92-1 '+ FEET 1 1 D-7 FIGURE 3-12 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 7 9"' T`l e~Tiiii ~~: KEY: .o L l~ p Corporate linii _________ Plannin Area Boundary •••••••••••••••••• i 9 (~aete~~a71 a Refer to land Use Tabtes 3-1 and 3-1 ~~ f~C Refer to Special Policy 5.2 ••...• ~~ ~ Anendirnt Boundary ~. ~. ~.. s r al NqP ANENDHEMS 92-1.6 - Fisheroan's Village 92-1.7 -First Unitarian Church 92-1.8 -Vacant Residential Lol r-~ ~Li3y ~ ~ . ~jidK1 ~ 92-1.6 '' ~ ~ 92-1.6 ~ ~ FISHERMAN'S VA(A6E ' _ c~ 5 a4 j 6.5 Rcres NORTH PALM , i rgva ~ pgG ~ y~ RMgN ~ ~ 48-Duplex Units R P 6) 5(Ct t Po tN y - . y.) o i . ©EACH FLOgIOS~ ~~a~92-1 ,7 "' y > :~ ~ 4 92-1,7 I I I I Nql :~ 'FIRST LNITARIAN CHURCH o zoo eoo aooo 1~ 92-1 8 ~ \ 2.54 Acres FEET . I ~, VACANT RESIDENTIAL R-5(Cty) to OPF(N.P.B.) 0.35 Acres I SOURCE: LRN, ]nc. R-StCty) to RL(N.P.B J Rev: Anendaent 92-1 13-8 ~ W N m = ° U U Za N W J m w m r w N J M 3 t a a ~- z ' a a I O= ~ x M t-~ ~ p ~ t7w o Z ~ w0 /~__ S W~ Q j OG£A11 ~ i' - l ~ Q f F ~ ATE-ANj~G ' / ~~ ; ~ ~~_ 5 J a~ ~ ~.r-..~i/ ~ g ' y'~Vti IY~~yi...T~ ~ • •t'~! y. .w ili N ~ 01 / ~ 4'' Z ~k S~ ' .- ~ pp~N ~ ~ ~ 6 •111~111111111111111 ~' l' ,( `~ ~ -Q ;1111111 1 :. ~. a - - ~ i ro~ ~ I: ....~ '•Y . ,~~ - q / -- F' Z _ ~ ~ _ i -7- ;. ~; ,., m •ip~ ~ r / N C1 p • ~- Y .-i .-1 i ~ M ~,,}~ N O ~N N % j u ° J# N ~a~ ~,7: C ~ -- =('~1(~I U any:; E Q ~ E~`~ C ~ I~S~~~ ~ N ~ ~ v 1~ w E :11ggi~ A w '~ ~ ~ -0is psi ~ w ~ ~ a T ~~~-i;~ y b :_ 1.:: _ ~ .~ N O~ J> Sr N v C 01 F: a P, U m a '!, v P: 1 1 L_ J 3-28 B-9 1 1 i~ N 11 C N E b C U1 E Q a, u m a '/. e, n ~ _ _ ~ a w ~ ~ `° a a ~ ~ r Q LL~ ~ ~pp S i a a i M H F- ~ W OQ~ u-~ ~ U Q o~EaN , ~ FS~ANS`C ~ _._ ~ ~ = ~ ... U r l l. ~ ~,.... ~ .. . , ' a ~~ vy~ J ~ ! ~ ~ a ~ ~ i ~ ! p w # r ~ '+ ~ ~ ¢ ~op~ `~K ~ w v ~ .a ~ N .. ~ ~' 1 ~ ~° ..l J ._ ~_~ y a. a ~ y ~ i ~ _ "wi ~ . '.3" °~a ~ ,~ w• _ f ( i , ' ~, + • i ~.. ~ d.N 'a~~ }~~ ~ ~ Z N qt ~~ r I __~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~k ~ N " ~ N N E ~J ~ ~ C' ~ E ~ ~ ik '~ / CC! E v c v ^ ~ E v c = _ a. E ~, E C w E a a „ • a a m ~ a ,~ ¢ a a x / x a x b Y 3-33 I3-10 - , ID to Amendment to Amendment it92-1.2 I .~ #92-1.1 I Io + ~ N 2 I 9 7 9 I 2 ` 1 a I 9~ ~ v~ t- I ~ I ~~~j, ~ yZ.-1 I I 2 w ~ ° •~ II ~ I S O I I I : .... Rd ' ~ ~ ~/ Amendments I #92-1.8 I Northiako Blvd. 3 1. CORPORATE LIMITS KEY: I. ARENT3roaeAN ueo coMrL[itl.7, CANAVERALIUneANLANOCOUruxl SCALE: t In./too0 tt. 2, gUARTZIPSAMMENTS B. COCOAIUIIBAN LANG COM-~[%) ' 3. UR6AN LAND 9. BASINGER,FINE SAND ~. TIDAL SYlAMP 10. RIVIERA IuneAN LANG coNrLCxI 5. E3EACHES 1 1. BASINGERIuneAN LANG cour~cxl Q. PALM BEACHtoneAn NANO cowrLCx) FIGURE 3-15 GENERALIZED SOILS MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP 3~IES SOURCE: PALM DEACIi COUNTY AREA PLANNING ©OARD~, 197Q i 1 n Kev.: NYLiCP Amnnflmeni-, 92_~ 3-34 B-11 1 it 4 O M , of 4 A d d - 4 C q -n d 9 ~ 9 d I 7 N •• .~ J N U ~.~ 1 G E O ti O A P d O >. U F.,-~ d~ z ~ w v 7 N d I w v w ti ~ zc> i,y, w b d N d n T. E- H rnv> 4 R 6 H I O[ F ~c i wv >' d civ. z r. w d r S F. QQR T U a w m J Q a x H a O Z LL O w c~ J , a a w W ~ u -' 2 O a x w z Z Q ~ ~ . - . M m . ~ e ~, '. d p ~ 4 d ,y N O b N N li {I r1 p it ~ K i 'U m oa ~\ w v vv ,rJw 'o .a U V 3-3II r>. -- i ~ w Q a W W a N Q a Y O ~ F. w M Q (n W X ~ W ~ z °z ~ Q J W w ~ a a ~_. U. (L oGEA~i G a 0 al d a v I t i i ~_ ~_~ ,- U W ^ ~~ Z L O N i l_ t r S ~~ o~ Q a F. W t Z QO ,N w 4 A~~NT~G OC~pC1 rn u 0 ~01 (.+ 'w ~ Z "o FN z x a z w R z 0 z .. ~~ o o n ~ ~ W ~ U c z - a .- a w N J Z t - U J Y) .~ C W O W LL W U m ¢ r ~ ~ O m W_ W Na Ewa ~z~ MN~ W ~ ~ Z ~_ ~ Q LLLL J W H LL 3-36 B-]3