Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-056 Evaluation & Appraisal Report.. RESOLUTION NO. 56-96 A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ACT," BEING SECTIONS 163.3161 ET. SEQ., FLORIDA STATUTES, ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A"; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING VILLAGE STAFF TO TRANSMIT THIS RESOLUTION AND ACCOMPANYING REPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act, the Village of North Palm Beach is required to periodically prepare and adopt an Evaluation and Appraisal Report to evaluate the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission acting as the local planning agency held an advertised public hearing on July 2, 1996, and recommended approval of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report; and wHEREAS, the Village Council held a public hearing on August 22, 1996, to consider the Evaluation and Appraisal Report; and WHEREAS, the Village Council finds that the evaluation and • appraisal report has been prepared consistent and in accordance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9 J-5, Florida r~ u Administrative Code, and that such report will ensure that the plan continues to provide sufficient guidance to the Village regarding land development decisions. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Village Council of the Village of North u • Palm Beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9 J-5, Florida Administrative Code, hereby adopts the Evaluation and Appraisal Report of the Village of North Palm Beach Florida, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. Section 2. The Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to transmit the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report of the Village of North Palm Beach, Florida, to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for sufficiency determination. Section 3. This Resolution together with Exhibit "A" shall be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs prior to September 1, 1996. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ntl DAY OF AUGUST 1996. • (Village Seal) ~ts~'s~7 ~~i MAYOR ATTEST: ~~ Village Clerk • ~~ THE VILLAGE OF North Palm Beach DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES 645 PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD . NORTH PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33408-4799 • 407-626-0212 August 28, 1996 Florida Dept. of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Plan Processing Review Team -EAR REVIEW 2555 Shurmard Oak Drive Tallahassee, FL 32399 ATTN: Richard Post RE: Submittal of Evaluation and Appraisal Report (E.A.R) for the Village of North Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida Dear Mr. Post: The Village of North Palm Beach is pleased to submit three copies of the above referenced E.A.R. The E.A.R. has been reviewed by the Local Planning Agency which, following and advertised public hearing on July 2, 1996, recommended that the Village Council adopt the E.A.R. for transmittal to FDCA. A public hearing before the Village Council, regarding the E.A.R., was held August 22, 1996. Following the public hearing, the Village Council adopted the E.A.R, by resolution, for transmittal to FDCA by,. September 1, 1996. A copy of the adopting resolution is included in" SECTION X of the E.A.R. If you have any questions regarding the E.A.R., please contact Tom Hogarth, Public Services Director at the following number: 561-626-0212. Respectfully submitted, /cF4 / Tom Hoc rth, P.E. Public Services Director cc: Village Manager Village Clerk Mr. J. Flei schmlann EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA PREPARED BY: VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH AND LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC. JULY, 1996 "PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT WAS AIDED THROUGH FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 93 206, LAWS OF FLORIDA AND ADMINISTERED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS." TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. INTRODUCTION I -1 II. CONDITION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION II- 1 A. FUTURE LAND USE II- 1 Existing Land Use Data II- 1 Land Use Analysis II- 3 B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION II- 7 Existing Traffic Circulation Data . . . II- 7 Traffic Circulation Analysis II- 7 C. HOUSING 11-12 Housing Data II-12 Housing Analysis II-14 D1. SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT II-17 Data And Analysis II-17 D2. SOLID WASTE SUB -ELEMENT II-22 Data And Analysis II-22 D3. DRAINAGE SUB -ELEMENT II-25 Data And Analysis II-25 D4. POTABLE WATER SUB -ELEMENT II-29 Data And Analysis II-29 D5. NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB -ELEMENT II-35 Data And Analysis. . . 11-35 E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT II-38 Data And Analysis II-38 -i- Section Page F. CONSERVATION II-44 Data And Analysis II-44 G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 11-48 Recreation And Open Space Data 11-48 Recreation And Open Space Analysis . II-49 H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION II-51 Intergovernmental Coordination Data. . . II-51 Intergovernmental Coordination Analysis. II-54 I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 11-58 Capital Improvements Data II-58 Capital Improvements Analysis II-59 III. FUTURE LAND USE AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAPS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION III- 1 A. FUTURE LAND USE MAPS III- 1 B. FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP III- 1 IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS SINCE THE TIME OF ADOPTION IV- 1 A. INTRODUCTION IV- 1 B. AMENDMENT 90-1 IV- 1 C. AMENDMENT 90-2 IV- 7 D. AMENDMENT 92-1 IV- 7 E. AMENDMENT 92-2 IV-17 F. AMENDMENT 96-1 IV-26 G. SUMMARY OF EFFECTS UPON EXISTING LAND USE DATA IV-27 V. CONDITION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL - 1996 V- 1 A. FUTURE LAND USE V- 1 Section Page Existing Land Use Data V- 1 Land Use Analysis V- 6 B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION V-13 Existing Traffic Circulation Data . . V-13 Traffic Circulation Analysis V-13 C. HOUSING V-22 Housing Data V-22 Housing Analysis V-29 D1. SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT V-33 Data And Analysis V-33 D2. SOLID WASTE SUB -ELEMENT. . . . . V-37 Data And Analysis V-37 D3. DRAINAGE SUB -ELEMENT V-40 Data And Analysis V-40 D4. POTABLE WATER SUB -ELEMENT V-48 Data And Analysis V-48 D5. NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB -ELEMENT V-53 Data And Analysis V-53 E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT V-57 Data And Analysis V-57 F. CONSERVATION V-71 Data And Analysis V-71 G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE. . V-75 Data Ana Analysis V-75 H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION V-83 Existing Data V-83 Section Page Analysis V-87 I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS V-90 Data V-90 Analysis V-92 VI. FUTURE LAND USE AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAPS AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL - 1996 VI- 1 A. FUTURE LAND USE MAPS VI- 1 B. FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP VI- 1 VII. STATEMENT OF MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT OF DEVELOPMENT, PHYSICAL DETERIORATION, LOCATION OF LAND USES AND SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS RELATED THERETO HAVING AN IMPACT UPON THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . .VII- 1 VIII. COMPARISON OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH ACTUAL RESULTS. . . VIII- 1 INTRODUCTION VIII- 1 A. FUTURE LAND USE VIII- 3 B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION VIII-11 C. HOUSING VIII-21 D. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE VIII-27 E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT VIII-42 F. CONSERVATION VIII-53 G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE VIII-61 H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION VIII-69 I. CAPITAL IMPOROVEMENTS VIII-79 IX. .IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDED ACTIONS IX-1 INTRODUCTION IX-1 A. FUTURE LAND USE IX-1 -iv- Section Page B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IX-2 C. HOUSING IX-3 D. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE IX-4 E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT IX-4 F. CONSERVATION IX-5 G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE IX-6 H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION IX-7 I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IX-7 J. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS IX-8 X. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS . . X-1 APPENDIX A - CHAPTER II EXHIBITS: CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION - MAPSAT THE TIME OF THE E.A.R. APPENDIX B EXISTING LAND USE LIST OF TABLES Number Page 1 Amendment 92-1 Land Use Summary IV-12 2 Amendment 92-2 Revision to TABLE 3-1 IV-18 3 List- Of Amendment 92-2 Map Scrivener Errors IV-20 4 List Of Amendment 92-2 Text Scrivener Errors IV-21 5 Amendment 92-2 Addition of TABLE 4-1 . . IV-24 6 Amendment 92-2 Addition of TABLE 4-2 . . . IV-25 7 Small -Scale Amendment 96-1 Summary . . . . IV-29 8 Revised 1989 Existing Land Use Inventory Incorporating Future Land Use Amendments Through 96-1 IV-32 9 Land Use Classification System V- 3 10 1996 Existing Land Use Inventory V- 4 11 Permanent REsident Population Estimates. V- 5 12 Remaining Residential Growth Potential . V- 8 13 Vacant Lands Summary V-10 14 Land Use Projections V-12 15 Existing Major Roadway System Inventory. V-15 16 Trafic Count Data V-18 17 1995 Roadway Levels -Of -Service V-19 -v- Number Page 18 Projected Traffic Counts: 1995-2005. . . . V-20 19 Projected Roadway Levels -Of -Service: 1995 - 2005 V-21 20 1990 Comparative Housing Characteristics V-23 21 1990 Comparative Housing Cost Characteristics V-24 22 1990 Comparative Cost Burden Characteristics V--25 23 1990-1995 Comparative Building Permit Activity V-26 24 Inventory Of Licensed Rental Apartment Complexes V-28 25 Inventory Of Group Homes V-28 26 Village of North Palm Beach Drainage Areas V-45 27 Marinas And Boating Facilities V-60 28 Hurricane Evacuation Plan For Storm Surge Vulnerable Zones V-68 29 Recreation And Open Space Facilities . . V-76 30 Recreation And Open Space Demand Versus Supply Analysis V-80 31 Village Of North Palm Beach General Fund Revenues FY 1989/90 - FY 1994/95. . . V-91 32 Village Of North Palm Beach Enterprise Fund Operating Revenues Received 1990-1995 V-91 33 List Of Capital Improvements FY 1996-97 To Fy 2001-2002 V-93 34 5 Year Schedule Of Improvements V-96 35 North Palm Beach General Fund Capital Improvements Expenditure Potential . . . . V-98 36 North Palm Beach Level -Of -Service Standards V-99 LIST OF MAPS Number Page 1 North Palm Beach Planning Areas III- 1 2 Planning Area 1 Future Land Use Map. . . ▪ III- 5 3 Planning Area 2 Future Land Use Map. . . ▪ III- 6 4 Planning Area 3A Future Land Use Map . . • III- 7 5 Planning Area 3B Future Land Use Map . ▪ III- 6 6 Planning Area 3C Future Land Use Map . . • III- 9 7 Planning Area 4A Future Land Use Map . . ▪ III-10 8 Planning Area 4B Future Land Use Map . . ▪ III-11 9 Planning Area 5 Future Land Use Map. . . ▪ III-12 10 Planning Area 6A Future Land Use Map . . • III-13 11 Planning Area 6B Future Land Use Map . . ▪ III-14 12 Planning Area 7 Future Land Use Map. . . • III-15 13 Future Traffic Circulation Map - 1989. . • III-16 14 Amendment 90-1 Revision To FIGURE 3-13B. IV- 3 15 Amendment 90-2 Revision To FIGURE 3-8. . IV- 8 16 Amendment 90-2 Revision To FIGURE 3-9. . IV- 9 17 Amendment 90-2 Revision To FIGURE 3-17 • IV-10 18 Amendment 92-1 Revision To FIGURE 3-1. . . IV-11 -vi- Number Page 19 Amendment 92-2 Revision To FIGURE 3-3. . . IV-13 20 Amendment 92-2 Revision To FIGURE 3-10 . . IV-14 21 Amendment 92-2 Revision To FIGURE 3-12 . . IV-15 22 Amendment 96-1 Location Map IV-28 23 Amendment 96-1 Revision To FIGURE 3-3. . IV-30 24 Amendment 96-1 Revision To FIGURE 3-10 . IV-31 25 Existing Federal Functional Classification System Of Village Roadways. V-14 26 Traffic Count Station Locations V-17 27 Seacoast Utilities Authority Sanitary Sewer And Potable Water Service Area . . . V-34 28 North Palm Beach Drainage Areas V-44 29 Seacoast Utilities Authority Potable Water Well Fields, Raw Water Mains and Treatment Plants V-49 30 Wellfield Protection Zones Of Influence Seacoast Utilities Authority Wellfields. . V-56 31 Coastal Area V-58 32 ►later -Dependent And Water -Related Uses . V-59 33.1 Natural Vegetation, Wetlands, Coastal Vegetation And Beaches V-62 33.2 Defined Mangrove Area - Planning Area 6A V-63 33.3 Wetlands, Coastal Vegetation And Beaches V-64 34 Surface Water Features V-65 35 Recreation Facilities V-78 36 Recreation Master Plan V-82 LIST OF FIGURES Number Page 1 Future Land Use Classification System. . . III- 3 2 Map Key: Future Land Use Map Series. . . . III- 4 3 Resolution 12-87 X- 2 4 Schedule Of LPA Workshop Meetings X- 4 5 LPA Public Hearing Notice X- 5 6 Village Council Public Hearing Notice. . X- 6 7 Resolution 56-96 X- 7 SECTION I INTRODUCTION Periodically, the State requires that the Village's Comprehensive Plan be updated for the following purposes: 1. To incorporate more current data and analyses regarding conditions in the Village; 2. To assess whether or not the Plan's Objectives and Policies have been achieved and, if not, how they need to be revised so that they can be achieved; and 3. To address new or revised State comprehensive planning requirements. The Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.) is the vehicle mandated by the State to achieve the above three purposes. Following the completion of the E.A.R., the Village will have an additional 12 month period to update the Comprehensive Plan to include E.A.R. recommendations therein. The E.A.R. of the 1989 Village Of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan consists of the following parts, all of which are required by the State (The mandated parts will become sections of the E.A.R.). I - INTRODUCTION. II - STATEMENT OF THE CONDITION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION. This section is a summary of the dataand analyses that formed the basis for preparing the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. III - FUTURE LAND USE AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAPS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION. This section contains the Future Land Use and Traffic Circulation Maps, as they appeared in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. IV - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS SINCE THE TIME OF ADOPTION. This section contains a summary of all of the amendments to the 1989 Comprehensive Plan that have been adopted to date by the Village. V - CONDITION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL This section is an updated summary of the current data and analyses that will form part of the basis for preparing the updated Comprehensive Plan. VI - FUTURE LAND USE AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAPS AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL. This section contains the current Future Land Use and Traffic Circulation Maps, including all amendments since they were initially adopted in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. VII - STATEMENT OF MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT, PHYSICAL DETERIORATION, LOCATION OF LAND USES AND SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS RELATED THERETO HAVING AN IMPACT UPON THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. This section contains a discussion of issues that have arisen in the Village which may be reasons why Objectives and Policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan were not implemented. Many of the issues discussed are required to be addressed by 'the State. Also, any other issues may be discussed, at the option of the Village. VIII - COMPARISON OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH ACTUAL RESULTS. This section contains an evaluation of each Element of the Comprehensive Plan, in terms of whether or not Objectives and Policies were achieved. Also, specific recommendations for each Element are presented. Recommendations are oriented to: 1. Defining actions needed to update or amend Objectives and Policies; and 2. Defining additional activities that need to be completed to bring the Comprehensive Plan into compliance with new or updated State requirements. Although defined in this section, the above actions will be incorporated within the Comprehensive Plan (i.e. amended plan) during the 12 month period commencing September 1, 1996. IX - IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDED ACTIONS. This section presents, in summary form, all items which will be included in the updated Comprehensive Plan, based upon work completed in the E.A.R., as well as other issues raised during the E.A.R. process. I-2 UPDATED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT. This section includes an updated Capital Improvements Element, based upon the work completed in the E.A.R. XI - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS. This section includes a summary of the public participation process undertaken by the Village in completing the E.A.R. SECTION II CONDITION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS AT TIME OF ADOPTION - 1989 A. FUTURE LAND USE (1) Existing Land Use Data Requirement (a) The existing land use map. (b) The maps depicting natural resources. (c) The table of existing land use acreage and density/intensity. (f) The adjacent land uses and designated areas of critical state concern. Summary A majority of the soils underlying the Village are sandy, with drainage characteristics ranging from poof to excessive. However, natural formations have been significantly modified by urban development in large portions of the Village. Altered soil types are referred to as "Urban Complexes" and "quartzipsamments". Areas within the Village most affected by the limiting conditions of naturally occurring soils are the ocean beaches and tidal swamps located east of the Intracoastal Waterway. The distribution of generalized soil types within the Village is illustrated on EXHIBIT A-1. EXHIBIT A-2 graphically depicts flood zone designations within the Village. It is noted that related flood maps were prepared using U.S.G.S. maps that predated the filling of some of Planning Area 6A. Therefore, EXHIBIT A-2 may not accurately reflect flooding conditions therein. On EXHIBIT A-2, the 100-year flood boundary corresponds with the darkest pattern. According to the Flood Insurance Study prepared for the Village: "Natural drainage throughout most of the study area is relatively good, and the few low areas lie close to canals. The removal of storm runoff is facilitated by several man-made canals, including the Intracoastal Waterway, the C-17 Canal and the North Palm Beach Waterway. Many smaller waterways flow into these main canals. In addition to this manmade drainage system, the study area contains several bodies of surface water". Although most areas within the Village have been converted to an urban development status, there are three areas where native vegetation remains significantly evident: 1. The area located east of the Intracoastal Waterway; 2. Grass beds in Lake Worth;,and 3. The northwesternmost portion of the Village, in the area west of the North Palm Beach Waterway, north and south of Teal Way West. Areas containing significant native vegetation are illustrated on EXHIBITS A-3.1, A-3.2 and A-3.3. The major water bodies in the Village are the Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway, North Palm Beach Waterway, Lake Worth and the Earman River (C-17 Canal). In addition, there are many small manmade finger canals, constructed for the purpose of access, connecting these waterways. The Village also contains several artificial surface water bodies which include North Lake, West Lake, Prosperity Harbor and the North Palm Beach Yacht Club Marina. Surface water bodies within the Village are illustrated on EXHIBIT A-4, while beaches, shores and the estuarine waters of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park are illustrated on EXHIBITS A-1, A-3.1 and A-3.3. North Palm Beach was incorporated in 1956 as a totally planned community and has developed essentially as originally designed. There are slightly more than 3,204 total acres, or 5.00 square miles contained within the corporate limits. The Village is nearly built -out. Only 4.5% of the total area is vacant and potentially available for future development. Water areas constitute a substantial portion (38.2%) of the total area of the Village. The classification system used to inventory existing land use patterns within the Village is displayed in EXHIBIT A-5, while the existing land use inventory, derived by the application of the system to the incorporated area is presented in EXHIBIT A-6. Existing land use patterns in the Village are mapped on EXHIBITS A-7 through A-19. Abutting land uses within adjacent jurisdictions are also illustrated on EXHIBITS A-9 through A- 19. There are no lands designated "Area of Critical State Concern" within the Village. There are four sites (three archaeological sites and an historic building) within the Village listed on the Florida Master File, one of which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Each is located, accompanied by its Florida Master File Number, on the appropriate existing land use map (Ref: EXHIBITS A-9 and A-14). Historical resident population growth within the Village is presented in EXHIBIT A-20. The current year-round population is estimated at 12,782 residents. Pertinent demographic comparisons with Palm Beach County are as follows: 1. Median and average household income within the Village is substantially higher than Palm Beach County as a whole. In 1986, median income within the Village was estimated to be 128% of that witnessed countywide, while average income was 1 2 4 0 of the countywide figure. II-2 2. Median age within the Village is higher than the County as a whole. Differences in age distribution are evident within the younger age group (0-20 years), where the Village has a lower percentage and working age group (21-64 years), .where the Village has a higher percentage. The retirement age -group (65+ years) in the Village is comparable to the countywide rate. 3. Housing units in the Village are predominantly owner - occupied, with a higher proportion of owners (79.4%) versus renters (20.6) than the countywide rate (75.3% owners versus 24.7% renters). Current maximum -day seasonal (including tourists) population within the Village is estimated at 1,784 residents. Calculations deriving this estimate are presented in EXHIBIT A-21. (2) Land Use Analysis Requirement (a) The availability of facilities and services to serve existing land uses. (b) The vacant land analysis. (c) The amount of land needed to accommodate the projected population. (d) The need for redevelopment. (e) The development of flood -prone areas. Summary Potable water and wastewater service are provided by the Seacoast Utilities Authority through central systems which are adequately serving existing development in the Village. System operators state that current capacities are available to serve a build - out situation in the Village. Individual wells and septic tanks serve some individual residences in the Village (estimated 22 lots). These systems are concluded to be adequate to serve current demands. No specific problems have been._identified by the Palm Beach County Health Department regarding their use in the Village. Solid waste collection services are provided by the North Palm Beach Public Services Department, with some commercial establishments served by private contractors. The Village is currently being efficiently served by the department. Services are normally expanded to accommodate growth on an "as needed" basis. Drainage and transportation facilities (roads and streets) are in place and adequately serving existing development. However, a Master Drainage Study should be performed to specifically II-3 define the current level of service and the capacity of drainage facilities. The Village currently lies outside of the Restrictive Contour Zones of the Richard Road wellfield. Therefore, aquifer recharge is not an issue. However, drawdown contours should be reviewed periodically to determine if Village restrictions need to be implemented. The only road , within the Village with a potential level -of -service problem is that segment of Prosperity Farms Road between RCA Boulevard and Northlake Boulevard. Permanent resident population projections, assuming a residential build -out situation within 7.75 years, are presented in the following table: Permanent Year Residents 1987 12,782 1994 1 4, 322 1995 1 4, 484 1999 1 4, 484 Maximum -day seasonal (including tourists) resident population projections are presented in the following table: Seasonal Year Residents 1987 1,784 1994 2,120 1995 2,143 1999 2,143 Total maximum -day population projections (resident plus maximum - day seasonal), used for certain facilities planning purposes, are presented in the following table: Total Maximum -Day Year - Residents 1987 1 4, 566 1994 16,442 1995 1 6, 627 1999 1 6, 627 A summary of existing vacant lands within the Village is presented in EXHIBIT A-22. Only residential and commercial properties, based upon current zoning designations, are defined as vacant. In terms of development limitations (soils, topography, natural resources, historic resources, etc.) all vacant land within II-4 Planning Areas 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 are determined to be suitable for development. Vacant land within Planning Area 1 consists of Little Munyon Island, a 4 acre spoil island which is zoned C1A - Limited Commercial District. This parcel is currently in private ownership and, although such uses as hotel/motel, restaurant, offices and marina are permitted, development potential is extremely limited. Seagrass beds located to the east of the of the property represent the most significant limiting factor to development, in addition to the lack of available urban services. Vacant land in Planning Area 6A (102.02 acres) comprises 77% of the total within the Village, and 90o of the vacant residential land. According to EXHIBIT A-2, a large portion of high density area is within the Flood Zone A designation and includes mangrove concentrations. It was stated, however, that flood maps for this area may not be accurate due to filling operations which occurred after base maps were prepared. Also, intermittent mangrove stands exist along the North Palm Beach Waterway in the southern portion of the North Palm Beach Waterway and the southern portion of the Planning Area contains several oak trees. Soil types and related characteristics indicate that the eastern portion of Planning Area 6A is "somewhat poorly drained". However, the use of the planned unit development approach and maintenance of Village standards regarding the height of first floor elevations will permit development to occur at densities projected. Residential land use projections, to determine the amount of land necessary to accommodate future population growth, are presented in EXHIBIT A-23. Projections are made to 1994, as a build -out situation is assumed to have occurred by that time. Field surveys undertaken as part of the HOUSING ELEMENT indicate that the housing stock is in good condition. Normal maintenance should preclude the need for redevelopment activities during the 5 and 10 year planning periods. Further, all commercial properties appear viable and in good condition. As a result, no redevelopment needs are defined. Designated flood zones are illustrated on EXHIBIT A-2. Low-lying areas within the Village generally fall within the 5 feet to 10 feet msl range of elevations, while the base flood elevation is defined by the Federal Insurance Administration as the 100 year storm event. Coastal areas, properties fronting inland canals and a majority of the property in Planning Area 6A are most greatly affected. II-5 The Village has recognized flooding potential by requiring an 8.5 feet msl minimum first floor elevation for all structures. All structures within the Village have been erected at, or above this elevation, according to the Public Services Director. Further, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has stated that the highest flood elevation in Lake Worth within the Village limits was 7 feet 4 inches msl. Based upon this information, it is concluded that existing structures within the Village are protected from flooding and that redevelopment will not be necessary as a result of a 100-year storm event. Further, as previously stated, existing flood maps do not accurately reflect existing conditions in Planning Area 6A. As a result, development may proceed in this area provided that first floor elevations are constructed at, or above 8.5 msl. B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION (1) Existing Traffic Circulation Data Requirement (a, b, and c) The existing traffic circulation map utilizing FDOT functional classifications and depicting number of lanes for each functionally classified roadway. Summary The existing traffic circulation map, derived by applying the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) functional classification system to the street system within the Village, is illustrated on EXHIBIT -8-1. Descriptions of each of the major road segments, including state functional classification, laneage, maintenance responsibility and right-of-way width, is presented in EXHIBIT B-2. The Village contains arterials (both urban principal and urban minor), collectors and local streets. No limited access roadways are located within the Village, nor are there any ports, rail lines, high speed rail lines or related facilities. The Village has no planned, integrated bicycle path system in place at this time. However, one path currently extends from Teal Way and Prosperity Farms Road to the North Palm Beach Community Center and another path runs along the east side of U.S. Highway No. 1 to the northern corporate limits. These facilities were constructed jointly by the Village and Palm Beach County. The Palm Beach County Transportation Authority (COTRAN) currently operates bus routes through the Village. Various routes are available, according to specific time schedules, to destinations throughout Palm Beach County. The bridge on U.S. Highway No. 1, at the Intracoastal Waterway, is the only bascule bridge within the Village. When the bridge is in the open position, congestion and traffic stacking does occur. (2) Traffic Circulation Analysis Requirement (a) The existing traffic circulation levels of service and system needs. (b) The projected traffic circulation levels of service and system needs. II-7 Summary Traffic counts are taken at selected locations on the principal street system. Normally, in an effort to identify seasonal variations that may occur and arrive at an average daily traffic volume for a given calendar year, 24-hour counts are taken during the first (peak) quarter and third (off-season) quarter of each year and then averaged. However, since 1984, excluding permanent count stations, FDOT has counted only once per year, using a factoring system to derive annual averages. A total of nine traffic count stations are located either within, or proximate to the Village limits. The two count stations on U.S. Highway No. 1 both lie outside of the Village limits; however, they are the most proximate and used for analysis purposes in this element. One station is located south of PGA Boulevard, while the other is located at the north end of the Town of Lake Park. Two count stations are located on Northlake Boulevard, within the Village; one is located 300 feet east of Prosperity Farms Road and the other is located 200 feet west of U.S. Highway No. 1. Three count stations are located on State Road A-1-A; one within the Village near the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park. The other two lie outside the corporate limits; one is located 1,200 feet east of U.S. Highway No. 1 in Riviera Beach and the other is located 100 feet east of the Blue Heron Bridge on Singer Island. Two count stations are located on Prosperity Farms Road. One is located 187 feet north of Northlake Boulevard, within the Village, and the other is located outside of the Village, 334 feet south of PGA Boulevard. Historical traffic volume data for each of these count stations is presented in EXHIBIT B-3. Analyses of projected annual average daily traffic counts and derived peak hour traffic counts, in terms of general level -of service standards, are presented in EXHIBITS B-4.1 and B-4.2. In addition, independent counts, performed by JLH Associates during July, 1987 and derived level -of -service assessments are presented in the table below: Traffic Level Of Roadway Count (AADT) Service U.S. Highway No. 1 26,550 A (300' S. of Lighthouse Dr.) Prosperity Farms Road 11,629 C (600' N. of Lighthouse Dr.) Lighthouse Drive 9,632 A (300' E. of Prosperity Farms) W. Lighthouse Drive 5,646 A (300' W. of Prosperity Farms) It is recommended that the Village adopt the following level -of -service (LOS) standards: Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - C; and Peak Hour - D. A comparison of the above LOS standards to projected average daily traffic volumes, per EXHIBIT B-4.1, indicates that there are currently two roadway segments (both on Prosperity Farms Road) operating at unacceptable levels -of -service (i.e. LOS D and LOS F). A comparison of the above LOS standards to projected traffic volumes, per EXHIBIT B-4.2, indicates that the two roadway segments on Prosperity Farms Road are also operating at unacceptable peak hour levels -of -service (i.e. LOS E and LOS F). The roadway improvements necessary to correct existing deficiencies, based upon the capacity analysis are as follows: 1. The segment of Prosperity Farms Road, from RCA Boulevard, north to PGA Boulevard. Based upon an analysis of existing traffic volumes, in relation to LOS standards, this segment requires expansion to a three -lane section, at a minimum. Although this segment is located north of the Village limits, it has a direct impact on those segments within the Village 2. The segment of Prosperity Farms Road, from Northlake Boulevard to Lighthouse Drive. This segment requires, at a minimum, expansion to a three -lane section. Based upon an analysis of traffic accident data, the following segments or intersections are identified as frequent accident areas within the Village: 1. U.S. Highway No. 1, at the Parker Bridge; 2. U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake Boulevard (intersection); II-9 3. Northlake Boulevard and Prosperity Farms Road (intersection); 4. S.R. A-1-A, at Burnt Bridge; and 5. S.R. A-1-A at John D. MacArthur Beach State Park. The construction of an additional lane to Prosperity Farms Road, currently scheduled for construction by Palm Beach County, should alleviate the accident problem at the Prosperity Farms/Prosperity Farms Road intersection. Remaining improvements entail traffic signalization, improved roadway maintenance and additional signage. Five-year and ten-year road system capacity analyses are presented in EXHIBITS B 5- and B-6. Needed improvements indicated by these analyses are as follows: 1. The State maintained segment of U.S. Highway No. 1, from Parker Bridge to PGA Boulevard is projected to exceed LOS C/D in 1990 and be at LOS E/E by 1994; 2. The State maintained segment of SR A-1-A, from John D. MacArthur Beach State Park to U.S. Highway No. 1 is projected to exceed LOS C (average daily traffic) by 1993 with peak hour projected to exceed LOS D by 1995; 3. The County maintained segment of Prosperity Farms Road, from RCA Boulevard to PGA Boulevard, although scheduled to be improved to a 5-lane section, is projected to be operating at LOS E/E by 1999; and 4. The County maintained segment of Prosperity Farms Road, from Northlake Boulevard to Lighthouse Drive, is shown as LOS D/E in 1989; however, as a result of scheduled improvements to a 3-lane section in 1989-90, the LOS is projected to temporarily improve through 1994, but decline to LOS D/D by 1995 and LOS E/E by 1999. Since the major streets in tree Village are under the jurisdiction of other agencies, it is clear that the Village does not possess the authority, nor does it have the financial resources for correcting all of the traffic circulation system needs identified. Programs of other agencies with roadway responsibilities in North Palm Beach oriented to addressing identified deficiencies are summarized in the following paragraphs. FDOT has scheduled preliminary engineering for the widening of U.S. Highway No. 1 from four to six lanes. The schedule for construction has not been set as of this time. II-10 Plans to widen SR A-1-A have not been scheduled at this time; the only scheduled improvement is to modify Burnt Bridge to provide paved shoulders. Prosperity Farms Road is scheduled to be widened from two to five lanes, from PGA Boulevard to Burns Road, during FY 1988/89. Prosperity Farms Road is scheduled to be widened from two to three lanes, from Burns Road to Lighthouse Drive, during FY 1988/89. Prosperity Farms Road is scheduled to be widened from two to three lanes, from Lighthouse Drive to Northlake Boulevard, during FY 1989/90. In order to maintain the neighborhood character, the Village is opposed to any further widening of Prosperity Farms Road.' C. HOUSING ELEMENT (1) Housing Data Housing data, per the adopted 1989 Comprehensive Plan consisted of two basic sources: (1) 1980 Census data; and (2) field inventories and surveys conducted by the Village, JLH Associates, and LRM, Inc.. Requirement (a) Inventory of the number of housing units. (b) A comparison to housing characteristics in the county. (c) The inventory of standard and substandard housing conditions. (d) The inventory of renter -occupied subsidized housing developments. (e) The inventory of group homes. (f) The inventory of mobile homes. (g) The inventory of historically significant housing. (h) The inventory of recent housing construction activity. Summary Field research concluded that there were 6,407 housing units in North Palm Beach in June, 1987. The housing stock consists of 2,122 single-family units, 52 duplex units and 4,133 multiple - family units. In 1980, the Census reported a total of 5,741 housing units. Current numbers reflect an 11.6% increase in housing units during the 1980-1987 period. 1980 Census data and field surveys (structural condition) were used as the basis for describing the Village's housing characteristics. Several housing and household characteristics are described, including: Housing units by age of structure; housing tenure characteristics; monthly gross rent of renter - occupied units; value of owner -occupied housing; and monthly costs of owner -occupied housing. Several of the above characteristics are compared with those of Palm Beach County, including: Housing tenure characteristics (Ref: EXHIBIT C-1); monthly gross rent of renter -occupied units (Ref: EXHIBIT C-2); value of owner -occupied units (Ref: EXHIBIT C-3) and comparative age of year-round housing units (Ref: EXHIBIT C-4). From EXHIBITS C-1 to C-4, it is concluded that vacancy rates were quite low in the Village, as follows: Units vacant for rent -55 units (6.0% vacancy rate); and units vacant for sale - 41 units (1.0% vacancy rate). The aggregate vacancy rate for year-round dwelling units was 2.0% (96 dwelling units). II-12 The low vacancy rate is indicative of the demand for additional housing in North Palm Beach, both for rented and owned units. A summary of 1980 Census data, indicated the following age of structure distribution: Number Of Percent Of Year Built Units Total 1979-3/80 204 3.6 1975-1978 394 6.9 1 970-1 974 1,834 32.1 1 960-1 969 2,672 46.8 1940-1959 598 10.5 1939 & before 4 0.1 TOTALS 5,706 100.0 From the above table, it is concluded that a minor portion (602 units, or 10.6%) of the total year-round units were built prior to 1960. The value of selected owner -occupied housing is summarized, using 1980 Census data. A further summary of these data is presented in the following table: 1980 Value Of Selected Owner -Occupied Units Value Range Number Of Units Percent Less than $20,000 14 0.7 $20,000-$29,999 18 1.0 $30,000-$49,999 231 12.3 $50,000-$99,999 1,027 54.7 $1 00, 000-$1 49, 999 350 18.6 $1 50, 000 and more 238 12.7 TOTAL 1,878 100.0 Median Value $77,000 A windshield survey evaluating external housing conditions of the Village's housing stock was conducted in 1987, along with a review of housing and -building code violations. Based upon the results of the survey and file review, it was concluded that external housing conditions do not raise any issues regarding substandard housing and living conditions in the Village. There are currently no renter -occupied housing developments in the Village using Federal, State or local subsidy programs. II-1 3 According to the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS), there are four licensed group home facilities in the Village; two foster homes and two child care (day care) facilities. The foster care facilities are single-family homes and have a licensed capacity of one child each. The two child care facilities, Faith Lutheran Kindergarten (capacity - 128) and Lighthouse Baptist Church (capacity - 82) are located in Planning Areas 4B and 6B, respectively. North Palm Beach has no historically significant housing listed on the Florida Master Site File, the National Register of Historic Places, nor has any been identified by local action. The White Sails Trailer Court is the only mobile home park within the Village. The facility has 46 spaces, 4 of which are currently vacant. The park was annexed in 1988 and was assigned a commercial land use designation. The Village does not currently permit mobile home parks and the facility is considered a non -conforming use, which must be brought into compliance if redevelopment occurs. Based upon a field survey, housing stock has increased by 665 units since the 1980 Census. There have been no losses due to demolitions, fire and other occurrences. (2) Housing Analysis Requirement (a) Projected number of households. (b) The housing needs of the anticipated populations. (c) The land requirements for the total estimated housing need. (d) The portion of the housing needs projected to be met by the private sector. (e) The private sector housing delivery process and the problems it faces. (f) How the community will provide housing with infrastructure, eliminate substandard housing conditions, provide sites for low and moderate income housing, mobile homes, group homes and foster care facilities, and the identification of conservation, rehabilitation and demolition activities, and historically significant housing or neighborhoods. Summary Population projections for the 1987 - 1999 period are contained within the Future Land Use Element. It is projected therein that resident population will increase by 1,540 residents (681 households) during the 1987-1994 period and an additional 162 II-1 4 residents (72 households) during the 1994-1995 period, at which time build -out is projected to occur. Further, it is projected that maximum -day seasonal population will increase by 336 residents (170 units) during the 1987-1994 period and 23 residents (12 units) during the 1994-1995 period. Demand for new housing in North Palm Beach consists of additional units required to accommodate projected resident household and seasonal resident growth. Housing needs projections for the 1987 - 1999 period, are summarized, by density category, in the following table: Density Projected Number Of Units Category 1987 1994 1995 1999 Low 2,222 - 2,513 2,546 - 2,546 Medium 52 88 92 92 High 4,1 33 4, 652 4,710 4,710 TOTAL 6,407 7,253 7,348 7,348 From the above table, it is projected that an additional 941 units will be required during the 1987-1995 period (i.e. projected build -out) to accommodate the Village's housing needs. Residential acreage needs to accommodate housing needs projections for the 1987 - 1994 period, are summarized in EXHIBIT A-23. From EXHIBIT A-23, it is projected that an additional 99.36 acres will be required during the 1987-1994 period to accommodate the Village's housing needs. Resident household projections, by tenure, are presented in the following table: Growth Household Growth Period Rented Units Owned Units 1987-1994 140 541 1995-1999 15 57 TOTAL 155 598 Historically, housing in North Palm Beach has been supplied entirely by the private sector. High Village household income levels, high housing values and rents, low vacancy rates and good quality and condition of the housing stock lead to the conclusion that the private sector will continue to meet projected housing demand throughout the projected buildout period. II-15 J Based upon the above considerations, it is concluded that all projected housing growth in the Village will be oriented to moderate, middle and high income groups. It is projected that 140 moderate income households will be served by housing growth during the 1987-1999 period, with the balance (613 units) serving middle and high income households. It is concluded that the private sector housing delivery process has the capability to meet defined needs throughout the short and long-range planning periods. Further, the private sector does not face any delivery problems, provided that no unforeseen problems arise in the real estate and/or financial markets. The Village is expected to fulfill the following functions in the delivery process: (1) Author the Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations; and (2) administer the zoning, ---subdivision, building and housing codes. Due to the current condition of Village housing stock, it is concluded that normal maintenance of residential properties will preclude the need for any replacement activities. Further, due to its removed relationship to agricultural areas, there is no need to provide farmworker housing. Infrastructure services are currently in place to serve projected growth in all areas of the Village. Major system components are in place or programmed to have capacities to accommodate the residential build -out of North Palm Beach. Local extensions of these facilities to accommodate any new development will be the responsibility of the developer. The private sector delivery process has adequately provided housing to accommodate the needs of Village residents at various income levels. It is anticipated that this will be the case throughout the long-range planning period. However, it is recommended that alternatives for encouraging group homes, mobile homes and elderly housing alternatives be pursued. Day care centers are the only group homes permitted under the Village codes at present; however, it is recommended that zoning amendments be incorporated to accommodate additional uses such as those permitted by Florida House Bills 782 and 1269. The Village has not designated any units as having historical significance, nor have any been placed on State or Federal registers. However, North Palm Beach should periodically consider the need to designate historically significant housing structures as a means of preserving the Village heritage, as well conserving its housing stock. Appropriate time to consider such actions are those during the mandatory Comprehensive Plan updates. II-1 6 D1. SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary The City of West Palm Beach wa designated (1979) as the lead agent for wastewater service planning for the Central Region (Ref: EXHIBIT D1-1) under the Palm Beach County Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan ("208" Plan). Further, Seacoast Utilities, Inc., a private utility company, was designated sub - regional service provider for the Palm Beach Gardens sub -region (Ref: EXHIBIT D1 -2) . In August of 1988, the Village of North Palm Beach, along with the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the Town of Lake Park, the Town of Juno Beach and Palm Beach County entered into an interlocal agreement establishing the Seacoast Utilities Authority (SUA) for the purpose of purchasing or acquiring Seacoast Utilities, Inc. The objective of SUA is to provide potable water and wastewater service within the service area previously served by Seacoast Utilities, Inc. SUA currently operates three sanitary sewer systems within its designated service area: (1) Anchorage Drive; (2) Cabana Colony; and (3) PGA. Service areas for each of the three operating systems are illustrated on EXHIBIT D1-3. North Palm Beach is currently served by the Anchorage Drive Plant, which also serves Lake Park, a portion of Juno Beach and portions of unincorporated Palm Beach County. Land uses within the Anchorage Drive service area are primarily residential. Commercial land uses are predominantly neighborhood and community -scale retail and office uses. Industrial uses are limited. SUA owns, operates and maintains the sanitary sewer collection system serving the Village, including lift stations and trunk mains or interceptors (i.e. gravity and force mains). With the exception of a few individual lots, the Village is II-1 7 served by central wastewater facilities. Components of the transmission system within the Village are illustrated on EXHIBIT D1-4. The Anchorage Drive treatment and disposal facility currently consists of the following components: 1. Treatment plant - A 4.85 MGD (design capacity) activated sludge secondary treatment process. The plant is currently treating an average of 1.69 MGD of raw wastewater, while FDER has permitted 3.69 MGD. 2. Effluent disposal - Secondary treated effluent is disposed of via surface water discharge to the Earman River. An NPDES Permit and state Temporary Operating Permit (TOP) have been issued to address the iss .es of volume of surface water discharge and. pollutant loading: The only limits to discharge capacity at this time are the volumes treated versus permitted discharge volumes. 3. Sludge disposal - Sludge is currently treated via an aerobic digestion process and thickened at the plant site, then trucked to the PGA Plant where it is further dewatered by belt press, to 125% solids, and trucked to an FDER approved landfill for final disposal. According to SUA, the treatment facility has the capacity to provide service to a build -out situation within its defined service area. The table below represents estimated 1986 flows for the Anchorage Drive plant service area and North Palm Beach: Estimated 1986 Wastewater Flows (MGD) North Palm Customer Group Total Beach Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) Residential 1.32 0.82 Non -Residential 0.37 0.23 Total AADF 1.69 1.05 Total Max. Month Daily Flow 1.84 1.15 Total Maximum Daily Flow 2.68 1.67 Within the Anchorage Drive Plant service area, it is estimated that residential customers discharged an average of 66 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) during 1986. On this basis, it is concluded that 20,000 people are currently being served on an average annual daily basis. Of this total, approximately 63.3% are residents of the Village. II-1 8 Further, the 1986 non-residential average annual daily flow (AADF) is defined as 1,060 gallons/acre/day. Total AADF, expressed on a resident per capita basis is defined as 84.5 gpcd. Maximum daily flow (MDF) is used to size facilities such as pumps, pipelines and chlorine contact basins to accommodate short-term peak loads. Current MDF, expressed on a resident per capita basis, is 134 gpcd. The distribution between residential versus non-residential wastewater flow in the Anchorage Drive plant service area is estimated as follows: Domestic (residential) - 78%; and commercial/industrial - 22%. The current level -of -service within the Village is defined as follows: Domestic - 66 gallons per capita per day; and commercial - 1,060 gallons/acre/day. The capacity of the Anchorage rive plant is limited, by.FDER permit, to 3.69 MGD, which is used as the basis for this analysis. Future demands and analysis of system capacity is based upon resident population projections and wastewater use factors expressed on a resident per capita basis. Village AADF, based upon March, 1986 wastewater flow figures, is 84.5 gpcd, while maximum daily flow (MDF) is 134 gpcd. The following table presents AADF and MDF projections for the Village: Year Population AADF MDF 1986 1 2, 468 1.05 1.67 1994 1 4, 322 1.21 1.92 1999 14,468 1.22 1.94 Using a plant capacity of 3.69 MGD and the year 1999 MDF projections, it is concluded that 52.7% of the plant capacity should be reserved for the Village at that time. Based upon projections it is concluded that the plant has the current capacity to accommodate growth within the Village for the ten-year projection period. Further, SUA has the financial and legislative authority to implement necessary improvements during the 1989 - 1999 period. The Anchorage Drive plant was originally constructed in 1956 as a 1.1 MGD trickling filter plant. Over the years, modifications have resulted in the transformation of the facility to a complete -mix, activated sludge process. Major treatment components are the influent pumping station, aeration basins, final clarifier and chlorine contact chamber. Effluent disposal is by surface water discharge to the Earman River. A toxicity problem exists with the effluent. A TOP issued by the state states that toxicity must be reduced by January 1, 1989 or a completed construction permit must be II-1 9 submitted which, when complete, will result in full compliance with all FDER regulations by July 1, 1990. The only known disposal option which appears feasible is a Class I deep injection well system, estimated to cost between $3.2 and $4.5 million. In addition, to increase permitted capacity to the plant design capacity of 4.85 MGD, an additional final clarifier (estimated cost of $500,000) is required. In addition, other capital improvements (estimated cost of $400,000) to be considered include: Odor control; additional headworks; and miscellaneous walkways, railing and tankage refurbishment. Currently sludge is disposed of at the Dyer Boulevard landfill, following dewatering,at both the Anchorage Drive and PGA plants. The dewatering belt press at the PGA plant is functioning well; however, it is approaching the "limits of its useful life. The scheduled expansion of the PGA plant includes replacement of the press with two new units. Landfill disposal is costly and alternatives should be pursued. An office review of collection mains showed that systems are adequate to handle the capacities of the existing system. However, the review revealed that several mains have insufficient slopes to meet current permit standards. Those mains with substandard slopes may need to be replaced. An infiltration/inflow review did not reveal the existence of any extraordinary related problems. All components of the transmission system appear to be in good condition and adequate to serve the current needs of the system. The only exception is the use of an inappropriate air release valve on the force mains. Each of the system's 79 wastewater pumping stations (maintained by SUA) was reviewed and then subjected to field investigations. Generally, it was concluded that the 18 can -style pumping stations need to be replaced. These stations are located primarily in North Palm Beach and Lake Park. Remaining stations, of the submersible pump type, are in reasonably good condition. Most of the above identified improvements costs were prepared during the negotiations for the purchase of the system by SUA. Costs are divided into two categories: Seller costs (correction of existing deficiencies); and buyer (accommodation of near - term future system needs). Seller costs are identified at $ 7.68 million, while purchaser costs are identified at $7.58 million. Costs are to be financed by a $91 million revenue bond issued by SUA in February, 1989. The bond will also finance the purchase of the Seacoast Utilities, Inc. facilities (Potable water and wastewater) and potable water system improvements. II-20 There are currently 21 septic tanks in the Village, 18 of which serve single-family homes. Two are located on the North Palm Beach Country Club golf course and one serves the Village Community Center. Due to the limited number, low density of occurrence and drainfield elevations, no pollution problems have been noted by Village officials. If problems become apparent, central wastewater service can be made available. D2. SOLID WASTE SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary • The Palm Beach• County Solid Waste'Authority (SWA), a state agency formed by special act of the Florida legislature, was created in 1974 to develop and implement a countywide resource recovery and waste management program. The purpose for which the SWA was formed is to provide a coordinated countywide program for the control of solid waste processing and disposal. The Sanitation Division of the Public Services Department offers solid waste collection service, using equipment which it owns, operates and maintains, to all single-family and multiple -family residences within the Village. The Village also collects commercial solid waste, with the exceptions of 16 large restaurants. These facilities contract directly with private haulers to collect both trash and garbage. Private collection is necessary in these instances since the restaurants require the use of larger containers than the Village can presently service. The Village provides "backdoor" pick-up service to single-family residences three times per week. This service does not include special wastes, such as yard clippings, which are picked up twice per week. The Village collects all solid waste from multiple -family complexes. This classification represents one-third of all residential wastes generated. Multiple -family complexes use containers (dumpsters) to collect solid waste, which are then serviced by the Village once per week. The Village also provides additional service for the separate collection of newspapers once per week. Collected newspapers are then sold to a local purchaser. II-22 The Village does not provide collection service for construction sites; rather, individual developers are responsible for collecting and disposing of wastes generated on construction sites. The Village hauls solid waste approximately four miles to the Dyer Boulevard landfill for disposal. Trips are made once per day by packers servicing single-family areas and hauled "as needed" by packers servicing multiple -family and commercial areas. The Dyer Boulevard landfill received 442,249 tons of solid waste in 1986. Based upon a solid waste generation of 10,803 tons the Village's share of solid waste disposed at the landfill is 2.4%. The landfill has an additional 9 - 12 months of remaining capacity, per the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) Closure Plan. In light of this plan, the SWA is planning to construct a resource recovery facility on 40 acres, located immediately west of the existing Dyer Boulevard landfill. The facility, planned to accommodate the County's disposal needs for the next 20 years, is expected to commence operation in 1989 to coincide with the closure of the Dyer Boulevard landfill. The facility is planned to accommodate a disposal rate of 3,000 tons per day. If the actual rate exceeds this figure in the future, a second facility will be developed in the south County area. The SWA is also planning the construction of a solid waste transfer station, to service the north end of the county, off of Donald Ross Road. The use of this facility will reduce the hauling travel -time for Village trucks. The generation of solid waste is influenced by two factors: (1) The number of people; and (2) the amount and intensity of commercial and industrial activity. The majority of solid waste generated in the Village is from residential areas, while commercial and other areas contribute less significantly. According to the Village, solid waste generation rates have consistently increased over the last 10 years. EXHIBIT D2-1 presents solid waste generation, by month during 1987. Current generation rates, or levels -of -service (LOS) for the various types of generators in the Village are estimated as follows: Single -Family Residential - 0.926 tons/capita/year. Multiple -Family Residential - 0.588 tons/capita/year. Non -Residential - 6 tons/acre/year. II-23 Solid waste projections, for the 1987 - 1999 period are presented in EXHIBIT D2-2. Total solid waste projections for the Village, for the years 1994, 1995 and 1999, based upon the capacity of the regional resource recovery facility, are presented in, the following table: Village Regional Generation Capacity Village Share Year (tons/year) (tons/year) (% of capacity) 1994 1 5, 021 1,095,000 1.37 1995 1 5, 240 1,095,000 1.40 1999 15,240 1,095,000 1.40 The SWA is charged by Special Act to provide solid waste services for the entire County; therefore, allocation of capacity to various local governments will iot be done. However, SWA staff conclude that the regional resource recovery facility will accommodate the disposal needs of the County through the year 2000. The Village currently operates 7 packer trucks and 8 jitney vehicles to provide collection service. According to the Village, these vehicles are adequate to accommodate projected growth during the 1989 - 1994 planning period. However, the Village has an annual program of renewal and replacement consisting of the purchase of one packer truck ($51,000 in current dollars) and two jitneys ($14,000 in current dollars). The annual expenditure program equates to a seven-year rotation of packer trucks and a 5-year rotation of jitney vehicles. The total ($65,000) is an annual expenditure which should be included within the Five -Year Schedule of Improvements. D3. DRAINAGE SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) The identification of major natural drainage features and groundwater recharge areas. (h) The existing regulations which govern land use and development of natural drainage features and groundwater recharge areas. Summary At present, there are no Federal regulations to govern stormwater quantity management. However, the Palm Beach County Areawide Waste Management Plan ("208 Plan"), funded by a grant under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) addressed a broad range of potential water pollution sources, including stormwater runoff. The "208 Plan" focused upon identifying pollution sources and abatement needs, as well as the development of related regulatory programs. The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) has implemented a stormwater rule (Chapter 17-25, Florida Administrative Code) to fulfill part of the State's responsibilities under PL 92-500. The basic objective is to achieve 80% to 95% removal of pollutants before discharging stormwater to receiving water bodies. The rule requires treatment of the first inch of runoff for sites of less than 100 acres in size and the first one-half inch of runoff for sites larger than 100 acres in size. Implementation of the rule in Palm Beach County has been delegated to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) by FDER. The SFWMD has instituted exemptions to the rule requirements, including: (1) Residential sites for individual single-family, duplex, triplex or quadroplex units; (2) residential sites of less than 10 acres in size, with less than 2 acres of impervious area; and (3) agricultural or silvacultural lands having an approved management plan. Palm Beach County is one of 16 counties being served by the SFWMD, the local agency charged with the responsibility to operate and maintain major canals, structures and associated facilities. The surface water hydrology of the SFWMD is characterized by an extensive, heavily managed canal network, II-25 a series of large capacity, low head pumping stations and several surface water impoundment areas that comprise more than 1,000 square miles. The Lower East Coast Canal system of the SFWMD most directly effects the Village. The coastal canal networks of Palm Beach County provide primary drainage for the heavily developed southeastern urban areas. The coastal canals allow transfer of water from the Everglades water conservation areas to coastal communities during times of drought. This water recharges major wellfields and raises groundwater levels to provide additional water to self -supplied potable water systems. Water stages in the eastern reaches of these canals are controlled by a series of water control structures, most of which are automatically operated to open or close in response to the canal water levels. The C-17 Canal is the coastal canal which the Village uses as one of its major stormwater discharge receivers. The C-17 Basin has an area of approximately 32 square miles, as shown on EXHIBIT D3-1. The C-17 has two functions: (1) To provide flood protection and drainage for the C-17 Basin; and (2) to maintain a ground water table elevation near the lower reach of the canal to prevent saltwater intrusion into local ground waters. Excess water in the basin is discharged via the S-44 Salinity Control Structure, which also controls overall water flow within the basin. East of this structure, water in the Canal is tidal influenced and brackish in nature. In general, the only water supply to the basin is local rainfall. Flows into the C-17 Canal are from various canals under the management of local municipalities and the Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District. The entire Village discharges its stormwater into tidal waters, east of the S-44 Salinity Control Structure. There are four main tidal water bodies into which stormwater is discharged: (1) The Earman River (C-17 Canal); (2) the North Palm Beach Waterway; (3) the Intracoastal Waterway; and (4) the northern portion of Lake Worth. The commercial areas of the Village are confined to frontage along U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake Boulevard. These roads have curb and gutter systems, with positive outfall pipes to either the Earman River of Lake Worth. The drainage systems are maintained jointly by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Village. The Village drainage system can be divided into 27 areas, as identified on EXHIBIT D2-2 and described in EXHIBIT D2-3. The Village drainage system has been built in a piece -meal fashion, with the majority constructed between 1956 and 1970, II-26 prior to the implementation of any discharge regulations. The likely design criterion, similar to that used by FDOT, is a minimum three-year storm recurrence interval. Currently, SFWMD uses a five-year, one -day duration event criterion, which generally equates to a rainfall depth of 6.8 inches. A review of SFWMD daily rainfall data collected at the Jupiter Fire Station (nearest collection point) indicates that, during the 1978 - 1987 period, several storm events approximating the five-year, one -day storm event occurred. During this same period, the Village received few complaints from residents related to excessive flooding. Further, according to the Village, the maximum ponding time within the system has generally not exceeded 45 minutes. Ponding for periods'' of 2 - 3.,, hours occasionally occurs in Planning Area.3B (Yacht Club Addition) during periods of heavy rainfall coincident with a high tide condition when outfall pipes are partially submerged (in Lake Worth), thus temporarily reducing system capacity. On the basis of this evaluation, the design capacity and level - of -service is estimated to be at least satisfactory, in the developed portion of the Village, to meet the minimum criterion of a five-year, one -day storm event. However, it is recommended that the Village adopt an interim level -of -service (LOS) standard of a 3-year, one -day design storm until such time that a master drainage study (estimated cost is $45,000 in current dollars) is completed. Further, it would be beneficial to have a stormwater drainage study performed in recently annexed areas to determine if related drainage systems meet the minimum five-year, one -day storm event design criterion. Few areas of the Village are not currently being served by drainage systems, most of which are located in PlanningArea 6A. The Village should regulate development in remaining areas to ensure that post -development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do not exceed pre -development conditions. After 1995, the Village is projected to be built -out, creating a relatively stable condition and future emphasis should be placed on maintenance and repair or replacement, on an as needed basis. The Village drainage system has an indefinite life expectancy and will be repaired on an as -needed basis. Further, preventative maintenance needs to be performed to maintain system effectiveness. A routine drainage inspection schedule should be established to adequately plan and budget future repairs or improvements. II-27 Since the Village is currently 96% developed, it is assumed that future development will have a minor impact upon surrounding natural resources, provided proper planning and development regulations are implemented. The major natural drainage features in the Village are the water bodies that border and run through the incorporated area. The highest elevations occur in the interior of the Village and range from 12.58 NGVD to 29.58 NGVD, then generally slope toward the water bodies. All other drainage features are due to the design and construction of the current system. Related Village ordinances requiring permits prior to development and construction include: (1) Subdivision Ordinance; (2) Ocean Setback Ordinance; (3) Bulkhead, Dock and Wharves Ordinance; (4) Standard Building Code; (5) Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance; (6) Coastal Zone Construction Code; and (7) Marine Sanctuary Ordinance. The "208" Plan recommended that several non-structural stormwater related Best Management Practices (BMPs) be implemented on a countywide basis. The BMPs are designed to be a cost effective approach to reduce the detrimental impacts of pollution from stormwater runoff. The Village should consider the adoption of these BMPs for inclusion into site plan review processes. D4. POTABLE WATER SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary There has been no centralized, countywide potable water systems planning effort in Palm Beach County. As a result system planning has been accomplished by individual operators (i.e. County or municipal governments and privately -owned facilities. In August of 1988, the Village of North Palm Beach, along with the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the Town of Lake Park, the Town of Juno Beach and Palm Beach County entered into an interlocal agreement establishing the Seacoast Utilities Authority (SUA) for the purpose of purchasing or acquiring Seacoast Utilities, Inc. The objective of SUA is to provide potable water and wastewater service within the service area previously served by Seacoast Utilities, Inc. SUA purchased Seacoast Utilities in December, 1988. SUA currently operates three separate, but integrated potable water systems within its designated service area: (1) Hood Road; (2) Lilac Street; and (3) Richard Road. General service areas, including the location of wellfields, treatment plants and storage facilities for each of the three operating systems are illustrated on EXHIBITS D4-1 and D4-2. While each individual system consists of a separate wellfield, treatment plant, storage facilities and distribution network, they are all linked by a series of interconnections and distribution line loops. In this manner, SUA has the ability to channel potable water to any point within its service area, depending upon need. Although the three systems are interconnected, a distinction in service areas can be made by identifying the geographic extent of the distribution systems serving each plant. On this basis, North Palm Beach is currently served by the Richard Road Plant. Land uses within the Richard Road plant service area are primarily residential. Commercial land uses are predominantly II-29 neighborhood and community -scale retail and office uses. Industrial uses are limited. Two wellfields, one located at the plant site and the ,other located south of Northlake Boulevard and west of Alternate A-1-A (Old Dixie wellfield) serve the plant. The Old Dixie wellfield was not purchased by SUA, due to contamination by volatile organic compounds. The Burma Road wellfield, currently not in service, will be used as a replacement Current wellfield information regarding the Richard Road plant is presented in the following table: Richard Road* Total SUA System Number of Wells 13 29 Permitted Withdrawal Average Day 4.50 MGD 19.34 MGD Maximum '`Day 7.75 MGD 30.18 MGD * - Richard Road and Burma Road wellfields. The average depth of the wells is approximately 100 feet. Permitted capacity (by the South Florida Water Management District) for the entire SUA system is expressed both on an average day and a maximum day basis. Total permitted average day withdrawal is 19.34 MGD, while total permitted maximum day withdrawal is 30.18 MGD. Each of the wellfields is located outside of the Village limits, and defined wellfield protection areas do not encroach upon North Palm Beach. The following table illustrates the relationship between design capacities of the treatment plants and actual potable water treatment activities (i.e. 1986 flows): Plant Capacity Average Day Flow Maximum Day Flow Richard Road Lilac Street Hood Road 20.0 MGD 6.6 MGD 9.7 MGD 4.0 MGD 1.2 MGD 1.7 MGD 7.5 MGD 3.1 MGD 4.6 MGD From the above, it is concluded that maximum daily flow to plant capacity ratios for each plant are as follows: Richard Road - 60.1%; Lilac Street - 42.5%; and Hood Road a 48.5%. On an overall basis, the maximum daily flow -to -plant capacity ratio is 44.4%. Nine facilities, with a combined capacity of 7.55 MGD, provide potable water storage for the three SUA systems, as follows: II-30 Richard Road Lilac Street Hood Road Type Elevated Storage none none 0.3 MGD Ground Level Storage 2.13 MGD 2.12 MGD 3.0 MGD 1.00 MGD 2.0 MGD Total 2.13 MGD 3.12 MGD 5.3 MGD In addition, a remote elevated storage tank (0.3 MGD) is located at the Anchorage Drive wastewater plant. Using the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) preferred standard (storage capacity should equal 0.5 x average daily flow) capacity of SUA storage facilities is adequate to accommodate current flows. .ti The following water demand characteristics are important for assessing the capacity of water treatment, pumping and transmission facilities to serve customers, according to industry standards: Annual Average Daily Flow (AADF) - Total system water flow for the year divided by 365 days. AADF is useful for estimating annual operation and maintenance costs and revenues from water sales. Maximum Daily Flow (MDF) - The highest water flow during a single 24-hour period during any given year. MDF is used for sizing water supply facilities such as wellfields, raw water mains and treatment facilities. Finished or treated water transmission and distribution lines are sized to meet MDF plus flows required for fighting fires. Peak Hour Flows (PHF) - The highest water flow during any one -hour period. PHF is used for sizing water storage and pumping facilities. Typically, demands exceeding MDF are met by water available in storage facilities. PHF is also used in sizing finished water transmission mains. The SUA service area is divided into the Eastern and Western sub -areas. The Eastern sub -area is served by the Richard Road plant, while the Western sub -area is served by the Hood Road and Lilac Street plants. The following table presents 1986 water flows: Estimated 1986 Waste Flows (MGD) Eastern Western Total SUA Customer Group Area Area Area Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) Residential 2.33 6.21 8.54 Non -Residential 0.77 1.54 2.31 Total AADF 3.10 7.75 10.85 Total Max. Month Daily Flow (MDF) 4.60 11.40 16.00 Total Peak Hour Flow (PHF) 6.50 13.90 20.40 II-31 Within the Eastern area, single-family and multiple -family customers used an estimated 99 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in 1986, while those in the Western subarea used an estimated 92 gpcd. Estimates were supplied by SUA staff. During 1986, non residential customers in the Eastern sub -area used 0.8 MGD, on an average daily basis, while those in the Western sub -area used 1.5 MGD. It is estimated that the Eastern sub -area currently serves 23,535 people, while the Western sub -area serves 62,727 people. Therefore, average daily non-residential consumption is expressed as follows: Eastern Sub -Area - 32.7 gpcd; and Western Sub -Area - 24.9 gpcd. Total average daily (AADF) and maximum daily (MDF) consumption, expressed on a per capita basis is estimated as follows: Sub -Area Total AADF MDF Eastern 131.7 gpcd 195.5 gpcd Western 116.6 gpcd 181.7 gpcd On the basis of the above analyses, potable water consumption for the Village is estimated as follows: Estimated 1986 Waste Flows (MGD) Customer Group Village Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) Residential 1.23 Non -Residential 0.41 Total AADF 1.64 Total Max. Month Daily Flow (MDF) 2.43 Further, on the basis of the above, it is estimated that the Village currently uses the following shares of SUA potable water flows: Eastern sub -area - 53%; and SUA area - 15.1%. Due to the interconnecting nature of the SUA systems, capacity has not been allocated to participating governments. For planning purposes, the following level -of -service (LOS) standards should be used: Residential Non -Residential AADF MDF 99 gpcd 147 gpcd 1,874 gpad* 2,782 gpad* *- Gallons per acre per day. -32- Five-year and ten-year projections of Village potable water demands are presented in the following table: Average Daily Maximum Daily Year Population Flow (MGD) Flow (MGD) 1986 1 2, 468 1.64 2.43 1994 1 4, 322 1.89 2.80 1999 1 4, 484 1.91 2.83 Based upon the above projections, it is concluded that the Eastern sub -area treatment facility (Richard Road plant) has the current capacity to accommodate projected growth within the Village for both the five-year and ten-year projection periods. Further, combined plant capacity at all three SUA facilities is 31.5 MGD. Utilizing MDF figures for the year 1999, 9.0% of the bombined plant capacity should be reserved for the Village. The Richard Road wellfield is a good producer. The Burma Road wellfield has borderline water quality; however, a blend of the two wellfields should produce a satisfactory water supply. In order for the Burma Road wellfield to remain free of contamination, the Old Dixie wellfield will need to be pumped, air -stripped and the water reinjected. The SUA potable water systems can serve only a combined total of 21,000 additional equivalent residential connections, due to limitations placed upon the amount of water which can be withdrawn from the aquifer. Projections indicate that an additional water supply will be needed by 1994. The Richard Road treatment plant has a design capacity of 7.5 MGD. The facility is currently being renovated, but it is old and the remaining useful life is undetermined. The facility, due to its age, has a best achievable condition of fair to good. The Richard Road plant currently has a 2.13 million gallon storage capacity. In addition, the currently inactive Carolinda repump station, which consists of two 750,000 gallon ground level prestressed tanks, could be placed back into service, if necessary. The water transmission and distribution is considered to be in good condition with the following exceptions: 1. Improve inventory of system; 2. Provide complete record drawings of system; 3. Compare current easements with line locations for the system; 4. Make methodical replacements of cement asbestos pipe to coordinate with Palm Beach County roar improvements program; II-33 5. Operate valves throughout the system to determine which which are operable. Make appropriate repairs; 6. Increase flow delivery capacity to the area of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail; 7. Increase flow delivery capacity to Lost Tree Village; and 8. Refurbish and renovate the Carolinda pumping station and storage site to enhance delivery of water to the coastal locations of the service area. Recent modeling of the Village distribution system by SUA indicates that adequate fire flows are maintained in North Palm Beach. Identified improvements costs were prepared during the negotiations for the` purchase of the system by SUA. Costs are divided into two categories: Seller costs (correction of existing deficiencies); and buyer (accommodation of near term future system needs). Seller costs are identified at $ 6.96 million, while purchaser costs are identified at $9.015 million. Costs are to be financed by a $91 million revenue bond issued by SUA in February, 1989. The bond will also finance the purchase of the Seacoast Utilities, Inc. facilities (Potable water and wastewater) and potable water system improvements. There are currently 17 individual wells in the Village, all of which serve single-family homes. Four are located in Planning Area 6A, while 13 are located in Planning Area 7. Assuming that consumptive rates are similar to other areas in the Village, it is estimated that current water use does not exceed the following rates: AADF - 6,296 gallons; and MDF - 9,812 gallons. On this basis, it is concluded that there is minimal impact upon the water supply caused by individual wells in North Palm Beach. It is not anticipated that any additional development will be served by individual wells. II-34 D5. NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary Geologic formations can be divided hydrogeologically into aquifers (units which produce water), and confining zones (units which separate aquifers and retard the movement of water from one aquifer to another). The hydrogeologic units underlying Palm Beach County are the Surficial Aquifer System (commonly known as the Shallow Aquifer), the Intermediate Aquifer System and the Floridan Aquifer System. The Surficial Aquifer System provides nearly all of the ground water used in Palm Beach County. It covers the entire County and ranges from approximately 150 feet to 300 feet in thickness. Water levels in the Surficial Aquifer System range from a high of 22 feet NGVD in the north -central part of the County to close to sea level at the coast. Water levels in the system are largely controlled by the canal network extending from Lake Okeechobee. Recharge to the system is through infiltration from rainfall, canals, the Water Conservation Areas and Lake Okeechobee. Saltwater normally moves inland through the lower part of the Surficial Aquifer System, which is in contact with Lake Worth. As the saltwater moves inland, it decreases in salinity. This allows it to rise to the base of the fresh water portion of the aquifer. The diffused saltwater then tends to follow natural hydraulic gradients back toward the Atlantic Ocean. The barrier island (Planning Area 1), separating the Atlantic Ocean from Lake Worth, is subject to saltwater intrusion from two directions. Some degree of saltwater intrusion into the Surficial Aquifer System also occurs along the various waterways and bodies within the Village. The prime cause of saltwater intrusion in Palm Beach County is municipal water pumping. This can locally reduce the seaward II-35 hydraulic gradient and result in allowing saltwater seepage into the aquifer. Although saltwater intrusion is presently a problem at several wellfields in Palm Beach County, the Village has no significant problem at this time. The municipal water supply for the Village is drawn from points west of the Village, thus reducing the effect of the seaward gradient in the area. However, if pumping is allowed to increase without restriction, wellfield cones of depression could adversely effect the seaward gradient. The generally accepted solution to saltwater intrusion, as well as other water supply problems, is wellfield management on a regional scale. At the present time, however, there is insufficient information available to allow the County or Village to institute a comprehensive aquifer recharge area protection program. This problem should be 'resolved with the completion of the Ground Water Basin Resource Availability Inventory (GWBRAI) for Palm Beach County by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Until the GWBRAI is available, the County has adopted interim measures (Wellfield Protection Ordinance) to promote protection of aquifer recharge functions. The Ordinance is based upon known characteristics of development in the County and general knowledge of aquifer recharge principles. The Village is projected to be built -out by 1995. Thus the only potential effects will be from the limited reduction of vacant land area remaining within the Village as it relates to the recharge of the immediate groundwater aquifer. Palm Beach County has recently adopted a Wellfield Protection Ordinance to regulate the handling storage and production of hazardous and toxic materials within certain zones of influence of major potable water wellfields throughout the County. Major wellfields are defined as those which produce, or are planned to produce at least 100,000 gallons per day of potable water. A wellfield is subject to the Ordinance only when zones of influence maps have been developed. A series of maps have been developed for the Richard Road wellfield; the most proximate SUA wellfield to the Village limits. There are three regulation zones (zones of influence) developed around each wellfield: Zone 1 is in the land area situated between the well and the 30-day travel -time -contour line; Zone 2 is in the land area between the 30-day and 210-day travel - time -contour line; and Zone 3 is the land located between the 210-day travel -time -contour and the one -foot drawdown contour line, which ever is greater. In general, Zone 1 is a prohibition zone, while Zones 2 and 3 are permitting zones. II-36 E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (2) Data and Analysis Requirement (a) The inventory and map of existing land uses in the coastal area; the analysis of conflicts among shoreline uses; the economic base analysis; the estimate of the need for water -dependent and water -related development sites. (b) The effect of future land uses on natural resources. (c) The impacts of development on historic resources. (d) The inventory and analysis of estuarine pollution from existing and proposed development and corrective actions. (e) Natural disaster planning concerns. (f) The inventory of beach and dune systems and assessment of future needs. (g) The inventory of public access facilities and assessment of future needs. (h) The inventory of existing infrastructure and an assessment of future needs. Summary For the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the coastal area is defined as illustrated on EXHIBIT E-1. The Village is predominantly a recreation and water -oriented residential community. Four major waterways (Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW), North Palm Beach Waterway (NPBWW), Earman River (C-17 Canal) and Lake Worth), as well as three small water bodies (North Lake, West Lake and Lake Worth Cove) provide waterfront for residential and water- related land uses, including marinas, beaches, fishing areas and parks. The coastal area of the Village includes the defined water bodies, as well as the upland areas adjacent thereto. With the exception of the Earman River, all water bodies within the coastal area are characterized as typical tidally -influenced estuarine waters. Village marinas are located on EXHIBIT E-2 and characterized in EXHIBIT E-3. The 5 marinas in the Village, the Atlantic Ocean Beaches, nature trails of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and the many fishing areas along the shorelines of the various waterways and water bodies constitute water -dependent and water -related land uses in the Village. Lakeside Park, although located along the Lake Worth shoreline, is a passive recreation facility and does not provide any significant water -related use. II-38 Land uses in the coastal area are limited to residential, commercial and public lands. Single-family residential is, by far, the major land use type, with approximately 20 finger canals providing direct boat access to the Village's waterway system. The economic base of the coastal area is primarily associated with the residential character of development in the area, although commercial marinas contribute to the economy. The marinas represent water -related development and appear to meet the current demand for such facilities. There are no identified redevelopment areas within the coastal area. Water -dependent and `water -related land uses within the coastal area are listed in EXHIBIT E-3. The beach and shoreline uses within the Village, including the five marina facilities, are the only water -dependent or related uses in the Village. There are no ports, electrical generating facilities, water supply utilities dependent upon surface waters, or water -related uses directly associated with any such uses in the Village, nor are any planned. Conflicts occur when one land use is deemed incompatible with another. Such a condition occurs along the Earman River, at the Anchorage Drive wastewater treatment site. The plant is located adjacent to Anchorage Park and directly across from residential areas surrounding North Lake. The plant has been a source of odors and documented effluent discharge violations. No other conflicts are identified. With the exception of minor infill development activities, all of the vacant land in the Village is located outside of the coastal area (Planning Area 6A). EXHIBITS A-3.1 - A-3.3 and A-4 depict the natural resource features within the Village. In particular, the extent and locations of mangroves, sea grasses, beach and dune systems, water bodies and certain upland areas of environmental concern are illustrated. The Village contains a variety of ecologically important marine and wildlife habitats, the majority of which are located within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park (Planning Area 1). The Park is under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR), in cooperation with the County Parks and Recreation Department. The Park contains a diversity of important habitat, including mangroves, beach and dune communities, tropical and upland hammocks, mud flats and marine grasses. The master plan developed for the Park recognizes II-39 the sensitivity of existing environments and proposes appropriate development. Designated historic resources within the coastal area are sited on EXHIBITS A-9 and A-14. All but one of the sites are located within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and will be afforded proper protection. The other site is located within the North Palm Beach Country Club. Future land use and development in the Village is not expected to have additional adverse effects upon estuarine conditions. Present and future shoreline development or redevelopment will be permitted in accordance with applicable State and local regulations. The Village will preserve its character as a low density residential community and continue to develop with minimal impacts on the natural environment of the estuary. Water quality within the estuarine waters of the Village has improved in recent years; however, violations of State standards continue to be observed by agencies monitoring water quality within the canals and waterways. According to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), dissolved oxygen and nutrient problems still exist in Village canals and waterways; however, water quality has improved during the past 13 years. Both point and non -point sources of estuarine pollution have been identified within the Village. Point sources include the Anchorage Drive wastewater plant and the Village's stormwater outfalls. According to a report commissioned by Seacoast Utilities, Inc., the Anchorage Drive facility has indicated acute toxicity to selected estuarine and fresh water invertebrates as well as bannerfin shiners and fathead minnows. A review of the Village stormwater system indicates that there are approximately 50 outfall pipes discharging stormwater a into finger canals, waterways and the estuarine system. Stormwater runoff generally results in nutrient and heavy metal loadings to receiving waters. Non -point sources contributing to water quality degredation within the Village include boat and marina waste oil, lawn fertilizer and pesticides, and raw effluent from boat anchorage areas. These sources have been identified in the Palm Beach County "208" Plan and continue to persist, according to the Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD). The PBCHD has 3 sampling stations in and around Village Water bodies; however, sampling frequency is not sufficient to document II-40 specific water quality problems. Most of the Village is served by central water and wastewater facilities. Further, all residences in the coastal area are served by central systems. Therefore, no related water pollution problems are defined. S.R. A-1-A appears to be the only major road that could have an effect upon the coastal area, and since its length within the Village is entirely within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park, potential future improvements will come under close review by the Village, state and local government agencies with jurisdiction in the coastal area. The Village contains 20 dead-end finger canals, generally considered to have poor flushing characteristics. These canals can contribute to stagnant Eonditions and poor flushing, particularly during periods of flood tide and easterly winds. Further, the condition may be aggravated by the fact that stormwater drainage systems discharge directly into these canals. The condition has generally been confirmed, although no local data are available to lend technical support. Atlantic Ocean and estuarine waters within the boundaries of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park have been designated "Outstanding Florida Waters" by the Florida Legislature. All other waters are designated "Class III". The PBCHD, FDER, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, FDNR and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers all have a mandate to protect water quality, wildlife habitats and coastal vegetation within the Village. Marine grasses are protected by the PBCHD and Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management. The Palm Beach provides for an determined to be of a hurricane. a m eac County Peacetime Emergency Management Plan orderly system of evacuation of residents residing in high risk areas as a consequence The Village is located in Traffic Evacuation Zones (TEZ) 5, 6, 28 and 29. Route assignments and shelters are listed in EXHIBIT E-4. The capacity of Palm Beach Gardens High School, assigned to Village residents, is 2,410 persons. It is estimated that 5,965 persons reside within storm surge vulnerable zones (east of U.S. No. 1) in the Village. Using a 20% participation rate, 1,193 persons will require public shelters in the event of a hurricane. Estimates of 7 hours (daytime) and 9.5 hours (evening) are used by the County There are no draw bridges separating residents of the Village from the major evacuation routes. There are no hospitals within the Village, nor have any special evacuation needs of the elderly or handicapped been identified. II-41 For the purposes of this element, the coastal high -hazard areas are defined as those within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated V zones (barrier island). The Village has no development seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), nor does it have any developed areas that have experienced severe damage due to coastal storms. With the exception of S.R. A-1-A, there is no infrastructure located within the coastal high -hazard area. Post -disaster redevelopment is provided for in Chapter 161, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and the Palm Beach County Coastal Construction and Evaluation Setback Ordinance. Chapter 161 F.S. defines the coastal building zone as the land area from the high-water line to a line 1,500 feet landward of the CCCL. This area includes John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and the barrier island. Development in;this area is restricted to the Park, as described in the Master Plan, including a nature center, picnic areas, ranger station and caretakers' residences. Infrastructure improvements include utilities, roadways and boardwalks. Since all of the developed urban land uses within the Village lie well outside of the coastal building zone, post disaster redevelopment would occur without regard to coastal construction controls in much the same manner that non -coastal communities would redevelop. A 2.67 mile stretch of Atlantic Ocean beach, which includes 1.5 miles within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park is referred to as "Reach 3C" by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). This area has been identified as a candidate for renourishment. A preliminary assessment estimates that 422,000 cubic yards of initial fill material is necessary to add an additional 50 feet of beach width. Offshore borrow areas will be used for the proposed renourishment program. The Master Plan for the State Park identifies a 1,700 foot elevated boardwalk that will connect the Visitor Center to the beach. Pedestrian access to the beach is provided by several controlled beach access points from a trail located behind the dune. Present public access to the Park was rated "good" in a County survey of public beaches in January, 1987. Four of the five marinas in the Village are open to the general public, with the fifth (Anchorage Park) being restricted to Village residents. Only Anchorage Park has a boat ramp. Adequate parking is provided at each facility. Further analyses of each facility is provided in the Recreation and Open Space element. II-42 Existing infrastructure in the coastal area includes: Roadways; water and wastewater lines; the Anchorage Drive wastewater plant; and the existing stormwater drainage system. Each are discussed at length in other elements. The estimated costs, as well as funding sources and phasing of any defined improvements, are addressed in the Capital Improvements element. Requirement (4) Port Master Plans for Deepwater Ports (b) All items listed in (2), above, and the analysis of transportation needs, maintenance of inwater facilities, management of dredged material, hazardous material handling and cleanup, and handling and cleanup of petroleum products and the map depicting the boundaries of port owned or administered lands. Summary This requirement is not applicable since there are no deepwater ports in the Village of North Palm Beach. F. CONSERVATION ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (a) The identification and analysis of natural resources. (b) The commercial, recreational or conservation use of natural resources; known pollution problems; and the potential for conservation, use or protection. (c) The analysis of current and projected water sources and needs, including quality, quantity, conservation and protective measures. Summary Many of the natural resources to be addressed in this element have been previously analyzed and mapped in either the Coastal Management Element or the Future Land Use Element. The Coastal Management Element concludes that the Village supports both a coastal dune system and an estuarine environment, including wetland vegetation and valuable marine wildlife habitats, each of which are identified and analyzed in that element. It is the intent of this element to identify any additional concerns regarding natural resources. The Village contains a highly interrelated surface water system consisting of natural waterways and manmade canals (Ref: EXHIBIT A-4). Major water bodies in the Village are the Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW), North Palm Beach Waterway (NPBWW), Lake Worth, the Earman River (C-17 Canal) and the estuarine waters within the boundaries of the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park. Also, there are many small manmade finger canals which abut major water bodies, as well as smaller water bodies, including: North Lake; West Lake; Prosperity Harbor; and the North Palm Beach Yacht Club Marina. Surface water constitutes nearly 40% of the Village surface area. All surface waters, except the Ocean and the estuarine waters of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park are designated Class III waters by the state. The water areas of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park have been designated "Outstanding Florida Waters" by the Florida II-44 Legislature and are afforded the highest protection under state law. The C-17 Canal and the S-44 structure provide drainage for developed areas west of the Village, including a large portion of Palm Beach Gardens. Water quality of the Earman River (C-17 Canal, east of the S-44 structure) is therefore impacted by land uses outside of the Village. Available data indicate that the discharge from the S-44 structure contains nutrient and other stormwater pollutant loadings exceeding state standards. Wetlands vegetation in the Village is described in the Coastal Management Element as containing marine grasses and mangroves. Locations of these resources are presented on EXHIBITS A-3.1 - A-3.3. Mangroves' in Planning Area 6A are the result of encroachment of trees along old mosquito control ditches in the area. The estuarine system adjacent to the barrier island (Planning Area 1) provides a variety of wildlife habitats, including marine grasses, mangroves, mud flats, beach and dune communities and tropical and upland hammocks. These communities are further discussed in the Coastal Management Element. There are approximately 1.5 miles of Atlantic beach in the Village, all of which are located in the State Park. Flood plains as defined in Chapter 9J-5.003 (30), F.A.C., include the coastal area of the barrier island, portions of Big Munyon and Little Munyon Islands and the shorelines of Lake Worth, ICWW, NPBWW, West Lake, North Lake, North Palm Beach Marina and the Earman River, as well as residential lots adjacent to the finger canals located in the Village. An undeveloped area in Planning Area 6A and the Old Port Cove Area of Planning Area 2 are also included in the "A" Zone (Ref: EXHIBIT A-2). Areas identified on EXHIBIT A-2 as being in the "A" or "V" zones (darkest shade) are subject to inundation by a 100-year flood. Most of these flood prone areas are located on the barrier island and spoil islands of Lake Worth; however, some developed portions of the Village are also included. There are no commercial fisheries within the Village, although recreational fisheries, in the form of public and private marinas and docks, are supported by a fleet of recreational vehicles. The Village has no known source of commercially valuable minerals. There are no mining operations, nor does the Zoning Code permit any such activities. II-45 Soils and soil characteristics are discussed in the Future Land Use Element. The Coastal Management Element identifies Atlantic beaches within the State Park as being part of a 2.67 mile stretch of shoreline that has experienced extensive erosion in recent years. A study conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has estimated the amount of fill necessary to replentish the beach, identified potential "borrow" areas and considered the environmental impacts of the beach restoration process. Most of the developed portions of the Village along the inland waterways and canals have seawalls. Exceptions include: Earman River; the shoreline of the North Palm Beach Country Club, along the ICWW; and Lakeside Park, fronting Lake Worth. The banks of the Earman River have steep slopes and are generally not conducive to stabilized vegetation. Erosion of these banks can be expected to continue unless corrective and/or preventative measures are undertaken. A portion of the Country Club frontage, at the confluence of the NPBWW and ICWW has been experiencing soil erosion due to tidal currents and boat wakes. A program is under way to correct the situation. The shoreline of Lakeside Park has also experienced erosion due to wave and tidal actions. A program of restoration and maintenance should be undertaken to preserve this resource. Present air quality conditions in Palm Beach County are generally designated as "good". However, the County has been placed in a "non -attainment" category for atmospheric ozone levels. The Metropolitan Area Planning Organization (MPO), in response to the "non -attainment" designation developed a Transportation Control Program to measure and provide the means to reduce emissions of mobile sources. Likewise, the Palm Beach County Health Department has developed programs to measure and reduce emissions from fixed sources. Surface waters in the Village provide recreational and leisure time resources to residents and the general public. The Future Land Use Element (Ref: EXHIBIT A-6) provides an acreage breakdown of recreation/open space (197 acres) and conservation ( 385 acres) areas in the Village. The State Park is designated conservation due to its unique physical and natural resources. The potential for recreation/open space and conservation areas should be substantially the same at buildout due to the relatively small amount of vacant land in the Village. II-46 There are no commercial uses of the natural resources described in this Element and no such designations are anticipated. Estuarine pollution problems, as well as general water quality conditions, are assessed in the Coastal Management Element. Additional pollution and natural environment assessments are presented in the Future Land Use and Infrastructure Elements. The Village does not have any industrial land uses and thus does not generate typical hazardous wastes associated therewith. As a result, common household and commercial hazardous waste products predominate, including car batteries, pesticides, degreasing solvents and petroleum waste products. In addition, service stations and marinas are potential sources of fuel and solvent waste products, as well as leaks to surface and ground waters. It is recommended that a program defining such wastes and provisions for collection and disposal thereof be initiated by the Village. II-47 G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (1) Existing Recreation And Open Space Data Requirement (1) Data which identifies existing public and private recreation sites and open spaces available to the public. Summary The Village operates and maintains a number of parks and recreation facilities. These facilities, and associated activities, are described in EXHIBIT G-1 and located on EXHIBIT G-2. The recreation facilities provided by the Village are classified as either "neighborhood" or "community" in scope and as either "active" or "passive" in nature. Neighborhood facilities are located within, or near to residential areas and are primarily designed to serve Village residents. Community facilities are designed to serve the community in general both Village and non-resident populations. Active facilities represent an array of special activity facilities provided in close proximity to population centers. They often require specially constructed fields, courts or other apparatus which lend themselves to a particular user -oriented activity. Passive facilities require a resource base, such as the Ocean, lakes, woodlands or other natural areas, either natural or manmade, with which the user interacts. In addition to the facilities described in EXHIBIT G-1, the Village offers a variety of recreation and leisure activities to all age -groups, including: 1. Supervised recreation programs for youth provided during after school hours; 2. Daytime recreation programs at all parks during the summer; 3. Arts and crafts, exercise, ballet, gymnastics and other interests, based upon demand, for all age -groups; 4. Organized baseball, softball, soccer, basketball and a men's flag football program; 5. Year-round adult softball and volleyball programs; and 6. Leisure time activity clubs for senior residents. II-48 Also included on EXHIBIT G-2 is John D. MacArthur Beach State Park, a resource -based recreation area located on the barrier island. This facility is currently being developed and is scheduled to be completed by 1993. County and additional state-owned recreation and open space opportunities are easily accessible to Village residents. Descriptions of the facilities, including type, activities and political jurisdiction are presented in EXHIBIT G-3. Private developments within the Village often include additional recreation amenities, such as shuffle board courts, swimming pools, tennis courts and recreation buildings; however, they are not normally available to the general public. (2) Recreation And Open Space Data Analysis Requirement (a) The current need for recreation sites. (b) The projected need for recreation sites. (c) Future recreation uses depicted within generalized service area boundaries. Summary Current parks and recreation level -of -service (LOS) standards are presented in EXHIBIT G-4. From EXHIBIT G-4, current parks and recreation needs of the Village are currently being met. Further analysis of EXHIBIT G-4 indicates that future needs, defined as a build -out situation which is expected to occur in 1994, are projected as follows: One acre of neighborhood park; and one football/soccer field. Future neighborhood parks needs will be created by residential growth in Planning Area 6A, where 86% of the remaining development potential is located. Current Village land development regulations require that 5% of the area be dedicated for parks and/or recreation purposes. As a result, it is expected that approximately 4.5 acres of additional park lands will be added to the Village inventory as a result of the development of Planning Area 6A. The following recommendations should be considered when determining both the location and type of facilities in Planning Area 6A: 1. The site should be oriented to the development of a neighborhood facility to serve the future residents of Planning Area 6A; and II-49 2. A location adjacent to the Village Community Center is preferred. In addition, the following recommendations are made: 1. The Village should complete a recreation user survey as a means of determining whether or not existing facilities and programs are meeting the needs of North Palm Beach residents; 2. Pending the results of the survey, the Village LOS standards and 5-Year Schedule of Improvements should be revised, if necessary, to reflect actual use patterns and any additional facilities needs; and 3. Pending the°results of the survey, the Benjamin School should be contacted regarding the joint use of the football/soccer field. Pending the results of the recreation user survey and the review of specific development proposals in Planning Area 6A, no additional improvements are recommended at this time. H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT (1) Existing Intergovernmental Coordination Data Requirement (a) The inventory of entities within the area of concern. (d) The description of existing coordination mechanisms. Summary Adjacent governments are defined as those political entities, including Palm Beach County, which share a common boundary with the Village, including: (1) City of Palm Beach Gardens; (2) Town of Lake Park; (3) City of Riviera Beach; and (4) Palm Beach County. Coordination of land use planning and development of properties adjacent to North Palm Beach is accomplished on an informal basis through available notification, review and comment mechanisms during the comprehensive planning and land development approval processes. The Village Manager is primarily responsible for implementing coordination of planning with adjacent governments. Other agencies and entities with which North Palm Beach coordinates on a regular basis are listed in EXHIBIT H-1. A listing of key intergovernmental issues, as well as the entities with which the Village interacts is as follows: Issue Coordination Entity State Planning & Permitting Florida Department of Environmental Regulation; Florida Department of Natural Resources. Regional & County Planning Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council; Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council; Palm Beach County; Palm Beach County School Board; Palm Beach County Municipal League; Florida League of Cities. Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Florida Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Transportation; Palm Beach County. II-51 Police Protection & Law Enforcement Services Civil Defense & Disaster Planning & Preparedness Palm Beach County Sheriff; City of Palm Beach Gardens; Town of Lake Park. State Department of Community Affairs; Palm Beach County Civil Defense. Local Option Gas Tax Palm Beach County. Recreation Facilities Fire Protection Services Diocese of Palm Beach; First Presbyterian Church; MacArthur Foundation. City of Palm Beach Gardens; Town of Lake Park; City of Riviera Beach. Emergency Medical Services Inter -City First Aid Squad. Flood Insurance Federal Insurance Administration; State of Florida. Beaches & Shores Palm Beach Countywide Beaches and Shores Council. Low Income Housing Palm Beach County. Utilities Provision Florida Power & Light; Southern Bell; Adelphia Cable; County Sanitation; Laidlaw Waste Systems; Seacoast Utilities Authority; Florida Public Utilities, Inc. A summary of existing intergovernmental coordination mechanisms, by comprehensive plan element is presented in the following paragraphs: 1. Future Land Use The Village Manager and Public Services Department are responsible for coordinating future land use planning activities with adjacent municipalities and Palm Beach County. Coordination is accomplished primarily by means of the State's comprehensive planning process, which is coordinated by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC). TCRPC is also responsible for administering the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process as well as preparing the Regional Policy Plan (RPP). In addition, the Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council (PBCPC) II-52 is currently developing a policy to assist municipal governments in developing annexation plans. 2. Traffic Circulation The Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible for coordinating federal, state and local transportation planning for the urban area of the County. This responsibility is established by state law, which requires such organizations in counties having in excess of 50,000 residents. In addition, the Village has contracted the County to provide engineering services on Prosperity Farms Road and several signalized intersections. 3. Housing • The private sector delivery process is currently meeting the housing needs of Village residents. However, the Village does recognize the need for public sector and public -private sector ventures to meet low and moderate income housing needs countywide. In this regard, the Village has executed an Interlocal Agreement with Palm Beach County, detailing participation in implementing the County's Housing Assistance Plan. 4. Infrastructure Infrastructure services are provided by several operators and implemented by several mechanisms, which are summarized in EXHIBIT H-2. It is concluded that these mechanisms are currently effectively serving the Village needs. 5. Coastal Management The Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER), Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFFC), Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR), Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) and the Village all have statutory mandates to protect water quality, wildlife habitats and coastal vegetation within the Village. The FDNR, through its conservation and development program for John D. MacArthur Beach State Park, has assumed a major role within the Village for administration of resources on the Barrier Island in Planning Area 1. In addition, marine grasses are monitored and protected by Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management permit review processes. II-53 Although water pollution problems have been defined through various sampling programs, it is concluded that a potentially effective network of environmental controls is currently in place. The Village also participates in the hurricane evacuation program for the County. This program is an effective means to evacuate residents in case of emergency. 6. Conservation Coordination mechanisms and administering agencies responsible for implementing conservation. related programs within the Village have been discussed in other sections of this chapter. 7.Recreation and Open Space The Village currently provides facilities to residents using municipally owned or leased facilities. (2) Intergovernmental Coordination Analysis Requirement (a) The effectiveness of existing coordination mechanisms. (b) The problems identified in the plan which would benefit from improved coordination. (c) The need for additional planning coordination based on the comparison of growth proposed in the plan with the regional policy plan. (d) The coordination with any designated area of critical state concern. Summary There are no designated areas of Critical State Concern within the Village limits. Therefore, coordination with rules, principles for guiding development and development regulations in such areas do not apply. The TCRPC is the agency responsible for coordinating and implementing regional planning for a four county area, including Palm Beach County. In this regard, the TCRPC has adopted a Regional Policy Plan (RPP) oriented to implementing, from a regional perspective, 25 goals of the State Comprehensive Plan. An in depth review of the RPP was undertaken, in relation to the goals, objectives and policies of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Where necessary, language has been included to further RPP goals and policies. It is therefore concluded that Village planning efforts are consistent with the RPP and that additional coordination mechanisms are not required at this time. II-54 A summary of identified issues or problems which could benefit from improved intergovernmental coordination, by comprehensive plan element is presented in the following paragraphs: 1. Future Land Use The Village is most concerned with addressing the following issues: (1) .The potential development of submerged lands adjacent to the southern boundary of Planning Area 1, in Riviera Beach; (2) existing enclaves adjacent to Planning Area 2 (Palm Beach Gardens) and Planning Area 7 (Palm Beach County); and (3) potential incompatible development (medium density residential and commercial) of vacant areas within Palm Beach Gardens abutting existing single-family neighborhoods in Planning Area 7. Issues related to enclaves can be addressed by the adoption of the PBCPC policy on annexation. Potential incompatible development of lands adjacent to Planning Areas 1, 2, and 7 can be mitigated by formal request to Palm Beach Gardens and Riviera Beach that the Village be notified of any development proposals in the areas in question and that the Village be allowed to participate in the project review processes. 2. Traffic Circulation Although the Village is adequately served by existing mechanisms, several specific issues are identified, including: (1) The need for designation of S.R. A-1-A as a "constrained facility" (Planning Area 1); (2) the need for traffic distribution studies prior to consideration of additional expansion of Prosperity Farms Road, north of Lighthouse Drive; and (3) the need for additional distribution studies, prior to 1994, to determine if additional expansion of Prosperity Farms Road, south of Lighthouse Drive, is necessary. Each of these issues is beyond the scope of Village jurisdiction; however, the Village can initiate action by formally requesting participation on the part of appropriate entities. 3. Housing Technical assistance from the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (FDHRS) should be sought to draft appropriate zoning code revisions to permit additional day care, group home and adult congregate living facilities in the Village. 4. Infrastructure Although adequate coordination mechanisms are in place, several issues are identified. II-55 Effluent discharge problems persist at the Anchorage Drive wastewater plant. Seacoast Utilities Authority (SUA) and FDER are currently working to correct this problem, by elimination of the discharge by 1991. The Village must closely monitor the situation to assure that an alternative discharge method is implemented. Solid waste collection and disposal is being adequately administered through a coordinated system of public and private entities. Capabilities of each participating entity are sufficient to accommodate Village needs through buildout. However, it is recommended that the Village formally request assistance from the Solid Waste Authority to initiate a pilot toxic substances disposal program within the Village. Analysis of the Village drainage system indicates that the system appears to be functioning adequately. A joint drainage study with Palm Beach Gardens for the Sandalwood Basin, west of Planning Area 7, is recommended, in conjunction with the Village master drainage study. SUA exercises complete responsibility for providing potable water service to the Village. Current capacity of the system is concluded to be adequate to serve the Village through buildout. However, age and condition of some system components is defined as a potential problem. SUA through a number of corrective programs, is currently addressing each. Groundwater recharge is not defined as a problem within the Village. Also, participation in the Emergency Water Shortage Program, administered by the South Florida Water Management District, insures Village participation in conserving water resources. On this basis, it is concluded that no additional coordination mechanisms are required. 5. Coastal Management The resolution of the Anchorage Drive plant pollution discharge problem has been discussed in a previous section of this chapter. Further, additional water and sewer improvements were negotiated by SUA as part of the purchase of Seacoast Utilities, Inc. No additional coordination mechanisms are defined. 6. Conservation It is recommended that the Palm Beach Soil and Water Conservation District perform a vegetation analysis of Planning Area 6A for the purpose of identifying plant or animal species to be preserved when this area is developed. II-56 Further, it is recommended that the SFWMD be requested to participate in the Village Master Drainage Study to assist in defining and quantifying pollutant loads to the C-17 Canal generated upstream of the S-44 structure. 7. Recreation and Open Space Analysis of current and future needs indicates a projected need for a soccer/football field facility. The only are large enough to accommodate any substantial facilities is in Planning Area 6A; however, this are is not directly accessible to existing family neighborhoods. The defined need may potentially be met by entering into a future agreement with the Benjamin School, located in Planning Area 2, for shared use of existing fields. I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (1) Capital Improvements Data Requirement (b) Location and service areas of public health and education systems. (c) The inventory of existing revenue sources and funding mechanisms available for capital improvements Summary North Palm Beach Elementary School is the only major non -municipal public facility located in the Village. The facility, and associated attendance boundaries are illustrated on EXHIBIT I-1. Scheduled.; expansion of the school includes: Music and art labs; physical education office; storage space; kids labs; and resource rooms. for exceptional children. Current capacity of the school is 723 students, with current occupancy at 664 students. The expansion program is oriented to adding supplementary facilities. As a result, student capacity will not increase. Therefore, impacts upon municipal services are projected to be minimal. Municipal infrastructure and services are available to the school and no expected increases in current capacity are required to service the needs of the facility. The Village has a number of revenue sources to fund both operating costs and capital improvements. Revenues are grouped into two primary sources: Government Fund sources and Proprietary (Enterprise) Fund sources. The Government Fund consists of four separate funds: General Fund; Special Revenue Fund; Debt Service Fund; and Capital Projects Fund. General Fund revenues, used to finance the ordinary operations of the Village, include all sources except those which are required to be accounted for in another fund. General Fund revenue sources, using audited FY 1986/87 figures, are summarized in EXHIBIT I-2. The Special Revenue Fund accounts for specific governmental revenue requiring separate accounting because of legal or regulatory provisions or administrative action. The Federal Revenue Sharing Fund is the only Special Revenue Fund maintained by the Village. Since the program is no longer funded by the federal government, the only additional revenue that can be expected is accrued interest until such time that the fund is expended. The current balance is $1,940 as of September 30, II-58 During Fiscal Year 1987, the above fees generated $101,554, or 2% of the General Fund revenues. Enterprise Fund user fees are organized as follows: Membership: Resident and non-resident golf and social memberships. Sports Activities: Golf fees, locker rentals, and driving range lease income. Clubhouse and Miscellaneous. During Fiscal Year 1987, fees generated $1,050,284, or 100% of the Enterprise Fund revenues. 5. Adequate Facilities Ordinance: No such ordinance has been adopted by the Village at this time; however, this vehicle may be incorporated within the Village of North Palm Beach Zoning Code. 6. Mandatory Dedications or Fees In Lieu Of: This practice is used by the Village to provide public sites and recreation facilities. Also, streets, access waterways, easements, limited access strips and canals may be dedicated to the Village. The code also contains flexibility to negotiate other types of dedications, on an as needed basis. Local streets and drainage improvements are required to be constructed by the developer and potable water and sewer improvements are implemented through the Developer's Agreement process with Seacoast Utilities Authority, through a system of fees, charges and construction requirements. 7. Moratoria: The Village has not utilized the moritorium practice. 6. Intergovernmental Contracts: The Village does not currently provide services by contract to other government entities. However, many of the Village recreational facilities and cultural programs are open to non-residents for a fee. Most major infrastructure systems, including water and sewer and roads and streets are currently planned or in place to accommodate growth and development in the Village. Further, facility expansions and capacities are programmed to accommodate additional growth within the current corporate limits through build -out of the Village. All projected future growth in the Village is expected to be accommodated by in -fill activities, with the exception of Planning Area 6A. Additional facilities required to accommodate projected II-61 growth in that area are expected to be provided by developers. This conclusion should be revisited, however, if the Village entertains major annexation activities. It is anticipated that all capital improvements resulting from the analyses prepared in the Comprehensive Plan will be financed using General Fund revenues. The Five -Year Schedule of Improvements, identifying capital improvements projects identified in the Comprehensive Plan are presented in EXHIBIT I-6. General Fund capital improvements expenditure potential is projected in EXHIBIT I-7. Comparison with projects listed in EXHIBIT I-6 indicates that the Village has the capability to finance proposed projects. No Enterprise Fund capital improvements are projected. No new public health and education facilities are planned. As a result, there will be no impacts upon the provision of infrastructure. Prior to the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, the Village had no level - of -service standards for public facilities. The Village has not issued a development order for a large-scale development in several years. Thus, the location and improvement of ; facilities to accommodate new development has not been an issue. Further, the relatively low rate of growth within the Village has caused the community to become more focused on improving the quality of service to existing areas rather than serving new development. As a result of the adoption of the 1990 Comprehensive Plan, level -of -service (LOS) standards were adopted. The LOS standards are presented in EXHIBIT I-8. In order to assure that LOS standards are maintained, a concurrency management system is proposed. The system will insure that compliance with the Village LOS standards is demonstrated or provision of needed public facilities is included within the Five -Year Schedule of Improvements. An Adequate Facilities Ordinance is proposed to be in place by 1990 to implement the concurrency system. Further, existing deficiencies are programmed in the Five -Year Schedule of Improvements and funding mechanisms are defined. II-62 SECTION III FUTURE LAND USE AND TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAPS AT TIME OF ADOP ION -1989 A. FUTURE LAND USE MAPS The Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan was adopted, by Ordinance 23-89, on November 9, 1989. The Future Land Use Map consisted of a series of maps, one for each of the defined Village Planning Areas, which are illustrated on MAP 1. The Future Land Use Classification System is presented in FIGURE 1 and the Future Land Use Map Key is presented in FIGURE 2. Future Land Use Maps, for each of the Village Planning Areas, at the time of adoption, are presented on MAPS 2 - 12. MAPS 2 - 12 include scrivener error amendments (NPBCP Amendments 90-2 and 92-2, in part) which were adopted subsequent to Ordinance 23-89, but which had no effect upon the either the Village of North Palm Beach- Comprehensive Plan, at the time of adoption, or land use inventories and projections made in the Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation. B. FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP The Future Traffic Circulation Map, at the time of adoption of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan, is presented on MAP 13. (d rO 0 w U cd a) al E a co O$.4 za) 14-1 o a) (1)o z "-I a M •rl En a) $.4a) tea) •r.{ $-1 ▪ E .. 0 W U O III-2 FIGURE 1 FUTURE LAND USE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM For purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the following land use classifications, which are applicable to North Palm Beach, are used to describe existingland uses in the Village. The classifications are consistent with those defined in Chapter 9J5, F.A.C. and concurrent with the Village's perception of use. Residential: Land uses and activities within land areas used predominantly for housing and excluding all tourist accommodations. Commercial: Land uses and activities within land areas which are predominantly related t.o the sale,rental and distribution of products and the provision of performance of services. Recreation/ Land uses and activities within land areas where Open Space: recreation occurs and lands which are either developed or vacant and concerned primarily with active or passive recreational use. Conservation/ Land uses and activities within land areas Open Space: "designated" for the primary purpose of conserving or protecting natural resources or environmental quality, and includes areas designated for such purposes, or combinations thereof, as passive recreation, flood control, protection of quality or quantity of ground water or surface water, flood plain management, fisheries management, and/or protection of vegetative community or wildlife habitats. Public Build- Lands and structures that are owned, leased, or ings & operated by a government entity, such as Grounds: libraries, police stations, fire stations, post offices, government administration buildings, and areas used for associated storage of vehicles and equipment. Also, lands and structures owned or operated by a private entity and used for a public purpose such as a privately held but publically regulated utility. Educational: Land use activities and facilities of public or •private primary or secondary schools, vocational and technical schools, and colleges and universities licensed by the Florida Department of Education, including the areas of buildings, campus open space, dormitories, recreational facilities or parking. Other Public Land uses and activities within land areas Facilities: concerned with other public or private facilities and institutions such as churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, homes for the aged and infirm, and other similar uses. Transporta- Land areas and uses devoted to the movement of tion: goods and people including streets and associated rights -of -way. Water: All areas covered by water or any right-of-way for the purpose of conveying or storing water. Rev: 10/16/89 Source: Table 3-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November,1989. III-3 FIGURE 2 MAP KEY: FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES LAND USE CATEGORY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (FEWER THAN 5.80 UNITS/ACRE) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (5.81 TO 11.00 UNITS/ACRE) HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (11.1 TO 24.0 UNITS/ACRE) COMMERCIAL RECREATION/ OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION/OPEN SPACE PUBLIC BUILDINGS/ GROUNDS EDUCATIONAL OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION WATER PATTERN FACILITY NAME REF: FIGURE 3-14 Source: Table 3-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November,1989. III-4 A MAP 2 ---: • f �� o 8PB79 _ 0 13 A s r • • _A „ ....-, --D , 3 • ----\ , EARMAN RIVER (C-1 T CANAL) : •OVRetr L11W, !Ilea /•• LITTLE ■U TOM 1,_,Le�ererrerrtrrrrrrrreee�r��;rree.rrrre�r�rr BEACH PIA7PICA CON KEY: Corporate Limit — Planrting Area Boundary Iaeaeeeeeaeeeeeaeea RcCcr to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2 Historic Site * Florida State Master File * — 8108 79 �tLrrrrerrrrtre :(j 11111 rtrte1, • PLANNING AREA 1 .\ FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE :k MAP SERIES 1999 NORTH PALM 11111. Jo FEET Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 - Source: Figure 3-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. III-5 0 5 \ \ T 4. P`\ \\\.\\ `,,\\\1,`'•\\\';\\\`\\ �`�\ ._t►tlrtttr, \• \ 1 y A ti i1T �'(JII��U11 i�I�I fir r 1 ��u L,� ir.. 1 i I :MONET ROAD Tl T1 T 1 TrTiTiTIT TrrfTtTrnTCT (TIT • R!o RTH PALM BEACH I 200 600 r�'r I� FEET •OU/IRCII CAI+, IM:•1/68 MAP 3 ikEY: Corporate Limit Planning Area Boundary tcter to Lind Use Tables 3-1 and :13r2 Refer to Special Policy 5.2 AMENDMENT 92-2: 2-2;-and-2-28 3-1 and 3=2 . ............. 13 .i . . r!! ! /�1r� C,ll,r,, r fib �, ♦♦rr fits is ♦ r ♦ 4",94 ♦ ,.r�.. VI FUTURE LAND USE MAP 4 J FUTURE LAND USE • MAP SERIES 1999 s � PLANNING AREA 2 • • • • • • ♦, Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 Source: Figure 3-3, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. J Lu >- ►►►►► ►►►►► Q#C S'S•"U.—..4*.el" o . P. • •�y'. ;J� .',:;VS•. fn<i1 yft • ..---"---1/fO 0 U • • • w cc PLANNING 4� a 9 a �-0 aQ—o Ow W" — O ti =—O INC.2/SII SOURCE: LRU. Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 Florida of North Palm Beach 1989, as amended. 0 z III-7 r \ \E', ARMAN RIVER (C-1T CANAL)I't •OU CII (NC.2/S• MAP 5 KEY: Corporate Limit Planning 1.rea Boundary Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 4nd 3-2 AMENDMENT 92-2: 2-27-and-2-28 3-1 and 3-2 • • • FUTURE LAND USE .MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 38 • NORTH PALM BEACH FLORICA I I I I 0 200 600 1000 . FEET Revised:' NPBCP Amendment 92-2 Source: Figure 3-5, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. III-8 zlr c; t........ •• :t 4'7 2 leffv/r1011,0f0 11111 .tt1t f 1 ttttllt 0 w a J G 0 ti ►ALNZTTO ►AAK •O. J a a a li Z0 LCa Ow Z Q� 0 0 0 0 0 O -0 N 1- W •OUIICE: LItM. INC.2/I$ III-9 cu 1-1 G N rci omprehensive Plan; w� • 4) 0 Amendment Revised: A / 0 ,.:,•rr f.P rl t f'0 �•�I'll E E;.Hr.l•��iirrl 1 11 •"••. I 1I •OURCI. LAN, 114C.]/tr$ 4s MAP 7 KEY: Corporate Limit Planning Area Boundary 11101118111111111111111111 Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3 Historic Site lk Florida State Master File i! - BPp107 r AMENDMENT 92-2: 3-37-aad-3-38 3-1 and 3-2 8P6107 *' FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES•- 1999 PLANNING AREA 4A The Oakes Building is no longer in existence; however, reference —shall be retained until deleted from the. Florida Master Site I. File. • NORTH PALM BEACH FLORID ► I I 0 200 Goo 1000 _FEET Revised: "iPBCP Amendment 97-2 Source: Figure 3-7, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. co J a wax cEN NEN icra WATERWAYliegiii twits; C r —J z u W cc z W • N z z z (2.1 U 0 0 fa a)a s. U +� a1 ns a U tea) O m \ O 'O A.) fa cu �sJ E PLANNING AREA 4B • n u SOURCE: LRM, U u) fts ra a) al J N '>7 10 N M 1 CO CVC'11 c% M E W c Z tt o I zrt. W f 11 Z M Residential >, 4.) 4.4 CO a)• 1.4 A o rn Ea) • 4.) •M 13 U N I co I z (N) tx 0' 'v o c z a w 'v zma) '0 L., zcc ww Z E a rs+ ATTACHMENT A2-2 Residential AMENDMENT 90-2: PLANNING AREA 5 uuu f.� J a Q as . IL CC U Er a co OW o.2m as 2a W co W G c) Z Z O) Qaa) J J r W W CC CC NPBCP Amendment <=i 0 0 0 0 ILI 0 uJ SOURCE: LRu, • rO CU W E a ''WATER wAr ter--• Itiliiiiilt itittttitififitlIPROZPERITY FARM! ROAD11111t111$11111t1 1111111111111121 (ti ro oT3 r1 z w a) E 0 to CD c13 E CO ar- $-1 a.) o,n ZE a) 4-1 00 z rl a) o •H I M (1) a) a) bi E -H 0 wv 0 0 OP op a. $OYBCtI 1.1111, IWC.21$ OPF PROSPERITY HAROOR WEST 0 r LAKE MAP 11 KEY: Corporate Limit Planning Area Boundary ,usuu u,.i..•,'$l Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2 AMENDMENT 92-2: 3-3q-and-3-38 3-1 and 3-2 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND •USE MAP SERIES' 1999 • PLANNING AREA 6B • NORTH PALM BEACH PPLOFt* A I 14 0 200 600 1000 FEET Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 Source: Figure 3-11, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. '1 MAP 12 KEY:- ' Corporate Limit Planning Area Boundary ...■■.............. Refer to Land Use Tables 3-27 and 3-28 AMENDMENT 92-2: 3-33-and-3-28 3-1 and 3-2 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 7 " NORTH PALM BEACH FLORIDA 0 200 600 1000 FEET •,MI SOURCE: 1Ru, IMC.3/II SS SS it la RM Source: Figure 3-12, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. SECTION IV COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS SINCE THE TIME OF ADOPTION A. INTRODUCTION The 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan has been amended several times since its initial adoption in 1989. Amendments are assigned a numbered prefix indicating the calendar year in which they are adopted, as well as an amendment number, indicating the sequence of adoption during the year. For example, 90-1 indicates that the amendment was the first adopted during calendar year 1990. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan has been amended five times since the date of initial adoption. Each amendment contains one or more changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Amendments, as well as their corresponding adopting ordinances are listed in the following table: Amendment Village Ordinance 90-1 13-91 90-2 13-91 92-1 1-93 92-2 2-93 96-1 3-96 Amendments to the 1989 Comprehensive Plan have been made for the following reasons: 1. To address issues itemized in the Stipulated Settlement Agreement (DOAH Case No. 90-2326GM), dated July 30, 1990, between the Village and the Florida Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) regarding a Finding of Non -Compliance; 2. To correct scrivener errors on the Future Land Use Map Series and within the Comprehensive Plan text; 3. To address inconsistencies between Village land development regulations and the 1989 Comprehensive Plan; 4. To address inconsistencies between private land development proposals and the Future Land Use Map Series; and 5. To address Future Land Use Map Series changes required by annexation actions. Amendments to the 1989 Comprehensive Plan are individually discussed in the following sections of this chapter. B. AMENDMENT 90-1 Amendment 90-1 consisted of 17 text amendments to address the FDCA Stipulated Settlement Agreement discussed above. Amendments to be incorporated within the 1989 Comprehensive Plan were IV-1 specifically defined as part of the Agreement. A list of resultant amendments, including 1989 Comprehensive Plan section and page references, follows: 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, Section 1.6.6, second paragraph (page 1-29) was amended to read as follows: "Fiscal Year (FY) dates are utilized throughout the Comprehensive Plan as a means of specifically establishing measurability. The use of Fiscal Years will allow the Village to coordinate any expenditures required with the North Palm Beach Budget cycle. As a result, when an objective or policy statement is worded "by FY " (i.e. with the exception of development regulations, as discussed above), the actual date shall be the Fiscal Year end (e.g. FY 1990 shall mean September 30, 1990; FY 1991 shall mean September, 1 991 ; 2. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Special Policy 5.3 (page 3- 10) was amended to read as follows: "Special Policy 5.3: As a means of preserving native vegetative species in Planning Area 6A, require the use of the Village Planned Unit Development Ordinance to cluster residential units in defined buildable areas (i.e. all areas in Planning Area 6A are "buildable", subject to the application of Village Ordinances, with the exception of those delineated on the Mangrove Preservation Overlay; Figure 3-13B)." 3. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, FIGURE 3-13B (page 3-29) was amended as shown on MAP 14. 4. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT, Policy 1.1 (page 4-2) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 1.1: The Village hereby adopts the following Interim Average Annual Daily/Peak Hour LOS standards for each listed facility type, with the exception of Prosperity Farms Road: a. County Collector roadways - LOS Standard C/Peak Hour D; b. State Minor Arterial roadways - LOS Standard C/Peak Hour D; and c. State Principal Arterial roadways - LOS Standard C/Peak Hour D." 5. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT, Policy 1.3 (page 4-2) was amended to read as follows: . "Policy 1.3: The Village shall retain the neighborhood character of Prosperity Farms Road by adopting an Interim Average Daily LOS Standard D/Peak Hour D for this roadway until the IV-2 PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD MAP 14 - AMENDMENT 90-1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-13-B FIGURE 3-13B MANGROVE PRESERVATION OVERLAY - PLANNING AREA 6A A-..6 A FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES REF: FIGURE 3-13A MONET ROAD • rpm ♦♦♦♦ice♦♦♦♦iTh.if►♦1♦♦•••••ii •••••••••••••i •••i1k MANGROVE PRESERVATION AREA SOURCE: FDER DREDGE A FILL PERMIT f 500655759, LIM Inc. Rev.: 11/1/89, NPBCP AMENDMENT 90- 1 SCALE NTS effects of build -out and the widening of both SR A1A (Alt) and Military Trail can be evaluated." 6. HOUSING ELEMENT, Policy 3.4 (page 5-5) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 3.4: Provide, by FY 1990, innovative housing alternatives (e.g. reduction of minimum lot and housing unit size requirements, density bonuses, use of Z-lot and zero -lot line development concepts, transferring development rights from environmentally sensitive lands in Planning Area 6A, etc.) oriented to facilitating reduced housing costs. Any increases in density procured by transferring development rights offsite (i.e. from one project or parcel under unified ownership to another project or parcel under unified ownership) shall be used to provide housing oriented to accommodating moderate income households. Moderate income households shall be defined to include those whose annual income is 80% to 120% of the current median witnessed Village -wide, as determined by the Building Official. Transfers shall be accommodated by permitting up to a 20% increase in residential units allowed on the receiving property." 7. HOUSING ELEMENT, Policy 3.7 (page 5-6) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 3.7: By FY 1990, amend the Village Zoning Code to permit mobile home park development within the C-1 Zoning District and, by FY 1991, the placement of individual mobile homes within single-family and multiple -family residential districts provided that: (1) mobile homes must comply with all Village building, construction, design and housing codes that apply to all housing types and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development manufactured home construction and safety standards; and (2) they shall be subject to any Council, Board or staff reviews as provided in the Village Code of Ordinances." 8. HOUSING ELEMENT, Policy 3.9 (page 5-6) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 3.9: By FY 1991, review land development regulations and permit review processes related thereto for the purpose of eliminating excessive requirements and supplementing existing requirements in order to increase private sector participation in meeting defined housing needs." 9. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER EECHARGE ELEMENT, Policy 3.2.7 (page 6-9) was amended to read as follows: "7. Investigate in the Master Drainage Study the use of pet control ordinances, street sweeping, etc., as a means IV-4 of reducing pollutant loading to surface waters if, and when, cause and effect relationships can be established. As part of the Study, request local, state or federal stormwater permitting authorities to assist in determining whether or not these relationships can be established to technically justify any resultant controls or public expenditures. Further, continue to require the use of the following water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs): grass swales; vegetative cover; diversion/retention; erosion control; on -site retention; and catch basin cleaning." 10. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT, Policy 3.2.9 (page 6-9) was amended to read as follows: "9. Incorporate within the Village Land Development Regulations for: (1) maintenance of flood protection levels provided by natural drainage features (by FY 1990); and (2) implementation of Chapter 17-25 (Regulation of Stormwater Discharge), Florida Administrative Code (by FY 1991)." 11. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT, Policy 3.2.11 (page 6-9) was added to read as follows: "11. Within one year of the completion of the Master Drainage Study, incorporate its results within the Comprehensive Plan through the amendment process. At a minimum, the Plan Amendment shall include appropriate objectives and policies necessary to implement: (1) Improvements necessary to correct defined drainage system deficiencies; (2) practices necessary to effect water quality improvements; and (3) revision of level - of -service standards, if necessary. Additionally: (1) The 5-year Schedule of Improvements shall also be revised, as necessary, within one year of the completion of the Master Drainage Study; and (2) defined capital improvements shall commence within of the completion of the Master Drainage Study." 12. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT, Policy 2.4 (page 7-3) was added to read as follows: "Policy 2.4: During FY 1991, review the results of the Lake Worth Environmental Study to determine the need for Comprehensive Plan amendments by the Village to further protect marine resources and/or improve water quality." 13. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, policy 1.5 (page 10-3) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 1.5: Continue the current level of participation in the implementation of the Palm Beach County Housing Assistance Plan by updating and executing the current Interlocal Agreement IV-5 upon request by the Palm Beach County Department of Community Development. Further, by 1994, participate with other local governments, under the direction of Palm Beach County, to develop and implement a "fair -share" program to address countywide low and moderate income housing needs, including financing mechanisms and incentives and participation in State and/or Federal subsidy programs." 14. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, Policy 1.9 (page 10-3) was added to read as follows: "Policy 1.9: Pending the results of the County Environmental Study of Lake Worth, participate with other local governments in the development and implementation of a Lake Worth Management Plan." 15. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT, Policy 4.1 (pages 11- 5 and 11-6) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 4.1: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the Village shall certify that all public facilities are available to serve development for which development orders were previously issued. Development orders for future development shall not be issued unless the Village has demonstrated the following: (1) Compliance with the Village Level -of -Service Standards; and (2) one or a combination of the following conditions exist: (a) necessary facilities and services are in place at the time that a development order or permit, consistent with Section 9J-5.055(2)(e), Florida Administrative Code is issued; (b) a development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that a certificate of occupancy shall not be issued unless necessary facilities and services are in place; (c) necessary facilities are under construction at the time a development order or permit is issued; (d) for recreation or transportation facilities only, necessary facilities are the subject of a binding executed contract for the construction of the facilities at the time a development order or permit is issued which provides for the commencement of construction within one year of the issuance of the development order or permit and/or; (e) necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, including but not limited to development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220 or Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, which guarantees that necessary facilities and services will be in place when the impacts of the development occur." 16. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT, Policy 5.2 (page 11-7) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 5.2: The Village shall adopt an adequate facilities ordinance during FY 1990 to ensure that, at the time a development order or permit is issued, adequate facility capacity IV-6 is available, consistent with the criteria established in Policy 4.1 and based upon the application of the North Palm Beach Level - of -Service Standards to the proposed development. Development orders approved prior to the actual authorization for the commencement of construction or physical activity on theland shall be conditioned to provide that the actual authorization of the final development permit which shall authorize the commencement of construction or physical activity on the land shall be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development consistent with the criteria established in Policy 4.1. In all cases, a test for concurrency will occur prior to the approval of an application for a development order or permit which contains a specific plan for development, including densities and intensities of use." 15. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT, Policy 5.3(c) (page 11-7) was deleted and Policy 5.3(d) was renumbered to "Policy 5.3(c)". C. AMENDMENT 90-2 Amendment 90-2 was adopted to: (1) Implement the recommendations presented in the report entitled: "Village of North Palm Beach Review for Consistency Between the 1989 Comprehensive Plan of the Village of North Palm Beach", (Consistency Review) dated April, 1990; and (2) correct scrivener errors on the Future Annexation Area MAP. The Consistency review identified several inconsistencies between the Village Zoning Map and the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. The inconsistencies were determined to be scrivener errors on the Future Land Use Map Series. Resultant amendments to FIGURES 3-8 and 3-9 of the Future Land Use Map Series are shown on MAPS 15 and 16. Future Annexation Areas Map amendments are shown on MAP 17. D. AMENDMENT 92-1 Amendment 92-1 consisted of eight Future Land Use Map Series amendments, and related text amendments. Five of the eight amendments were the result of annexation actions and three were the result of petitions for Future Land Use Plan changes to accommodate private development objectives. The eight amendments are located on MAP 18 and summarized in TABLE 1. Resultant Future Land Use Map Series amendments are shown on MAPS 19, 20 and 21. IV-7 MAP 15 - AMENDMENT 90-2 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-8 FIGURE 3-8 IIIl,N PB — J Amended L WATERWA Y1111/11 IV-8 'sits r •i= ,ri PLANNING AREA 4B 0 O cn II o LU � U O . W O w . W � W Zm , NPBCP Amendment SOURCE: LRM, MAP 16 - AMENDMENT 90-2 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-9 FIGURE 3-9 N F z W z • • ia4clw• tr ate- --. . 1tttttttttttttttttttt / AMENDMENT 90-2: to n, • Sa W ` Q CC W a Ci) Z D Q) < < CD Q J W W C. CC CC .-4 4.4 411 • t1. a) �14 a) O C rn A • U 0 ac) i 0) v • C 4) rt a)▪ a) C E DELI Q ag 0 _W Z 1 o (1. to . m W w 1L < 4. cn 0W zm 0 NPBCP Amendment 90- 2 IV-9 FIGURE 3-17 ON AREAS FUTURE ANNEXAT :LLISON WILS FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES (CS� CI) '0 '0 aU 4.) •• N U •-+ I C E o 0 0 a. E y .a z m w!�w, 4 W V z C > W G) G) Z E a < MAP 17 - AMENDMENT 90-2 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-17 VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH Q` 13ROSPERI C7 0 R FA 0 W W J N co ANNEXATION AREA - • *tM .J� 4 IC►LI III WILCO: r CO W Y N J 0 • CD j+ Q C 0 z E/ e � a � a U m cc z L•MO OIOIAO CM YAMAOIYIMT. IV-1 0 MAP VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH N r4 N NORTH PALM BEACH PLANNING AREAS N FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES r Q)�F '0 Ar Air Ar CD E �. Air r a •; PS ., z 18 - AMENDMENT • •Q 92-1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-1 411111111. coo . . 4. • . -•- • — t 0: I ..s. 44 0 It Ar Air 41' 4 r 4111. Alta I _1 v E Maj a 1 D Amendment - 92-1 a U a z a) IV-1 1 z a a CURRENT CURRENT 0 W Z z DESIGNATION DESIGNATION al a C] a z a. Z z 4) L4 -0 s.i r0 '4 ro a ro c. a -•i c U U - U C.) U a) Ca Cr) 2 C] C: Z CORa Ca $4 a a a a - x a. a, a U v v Z Z v v 10 a: od N M - In LC) to d' W I I a a a a a a: a a: a z a x a 14 U As Developed Undeveloped Undeveloped Undeveloped Undeveloped Undeveloped Developed Developed Undeveloped N C CO cn to 0 in tf1 ch cc") totaling Amendment .cT rT rl .-I fQ 0 4) .-r m 01 to t*) to t0 (NI 0 r- 04 ?+ m m N — 10 CO r0 .-1 1-r z :+ 0 a) Cn :i O 0 �. Z to O U rr 14 s.i I4 rti O 0 .0 .O .-I U 3.4 W L+ ••-4 its >1 > r0 (C 0 v) CO U L4 CO x >ti r0 - a >; o •- s.t s.r -•i rc 0 E a) n) a a) rn - 0 E 0 O O O 0 •-r 0 4.) (13 0 3 s-r ro rt >a •�, -.� u) a) E E a U) U 04 - w N N N N 4 CO— •- * r.4 N MI Tr Ul to t0 N Cn v--i 1--4 r-1 — .-y .--1 r1 I. .-.I I I I I I I I 1 I N N N N N N N N CT C'i 0 rn rn a) ai rT rT IV-1 2 Future Land Annexation Amendment -4 N U al PGA BLVD \'1 •;�1rrIIrI11t11ii1 FrI IIlI � DaIes II _ uIIIY :MONET ROAD T1 it T1 s TfTITITITI (T1TIT\T(T fT R :, NORTH PALM BEACH F L.t7 Q I t3J► I I I I 0 200 600 FEET A FIGURE 3-3 1/11111111 92—I 1 wELVE OAKS 31.2 Acres •o7 Units 1i—S 54—Duplex 126—MF R-2(Cty) to RH(N.P.S.) :i ! I ,7 ^I ! t r q ;0, lV, 18, �' •, KEY: Corporate limit Planning Arta 3oundary Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 Refer to Special Policy 5.2 Amendment Boundary MAP AMENDMENTS 92-1.1 - Twelve Oaks ♦ ♦ ♦ C), FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE � C MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 2 and 3-2 is Inc — — — I, , II II II II Ir II I ','t111t11111/i SOURCE: LRH, Inc. Rev: Amendment 92-? MAP 19 - AMENDMENT 92-1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-3 IV-1 3 Cj _ino FIGURE 3-10 • i111it1t1tt1111titt111iit11111111111111.11 „ _ r i an r SEE — i — i i i i 92 ' 2 PROSPERITY HARBOR NORTH 33.4 Acres 98 SF Units R-3(Cty) to RL(N.P.8) -11111111- r h+OHET ill 92 mu 1.3 SANCTUARY BAY ■ 29.8 Acres 132 MF Units RL/RH to RN 92-1. :7 SANCTUARY COVE:; Acres 184 MF Units :11 -AL to c y.:10•1f ",. •.ter . /2- .38 VILLASE PARR 3.12 Actts WWI to ROS SOURCE: LRM, Inc. Rev: ,Amendment 92-1 .-- NMI OM 92-1. PROSPERITY HARBOR SOUTH 63.47 Acres 108 SF Units RL/RM/RH to RL i 1 KEY: Corporate limit Planning Area Boundary Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 Refer to Special Policy 5.3 Amendment Boundary .................. and 3-2 all E tRR — — MAP AMENDMENTS 92-1.2 - Prosperity Harbor North 92-1.3 - Sanctuary Bay 92-1.4 - Sanctuary Cove 92-1.3A - Prosperity Harbor South 92-1.58 - Village Park FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 Ir) ��,t�/=`� PLANNING AREA 6A PROSPERITY HARBOR tt IV NORTH PALM BEACH ruoi za.4 I 200 Soo 1000 FEET MAP 20 — AMENDMENT 92-1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-10 IV-1 4 FIGURE 3-12 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SEflIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 7 KEY: Corporate limit Planning Area Boundary Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2 Refer to Special Policy 5.2 Amendment Boundary .••••• Ell --INN UM MAP AMENDMENTS 92-1.6 - Fisherman's Village 92-1.7 - First Unitarian Church 92-1.8 - Vacant Residential Lot ri//113i111in 1: NORTH PALM BEACH FLORIDA I I 0 200 600 1000 FEET SOURCE: LRM, Inc. Rev; Amendment 92-1 • r _ y !ERL rr I it I- r _ it 7:4a +x.•• r i RL: !::e fI ?irn......... I-. • +"I . 92-13 VACANT RESIDENTIAL 0.35 Acres R-5(Cty) to RL(N.P.B.) RM PBG 92-1.6 FISHERMAN'S VILLAGE 6.5 Acres 48-Dupiex Units R-5(Cty.) to RM(N.P.B) 92-1.7 'FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH 2.54 Acres R-5(Cty) to OPF(N.P.B.) MAP 21 — AMENDMENT 92-1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3 — 1 2 IV-1 5 In response to the FDCA "Objections, Recommendations and Comments" (ORC) report regarding proposed 92-1 amendments, the following text amendments were also adopted: 1. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Policy 2.4 (page 3-7) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 2.4: The clearing of any wetlands vegetation or land assigned a Conservation Land Use Category on the Future Land Use Map Series shall not be approved by the Village until such time that appropriate permits have been procured, by the developer, from the Palm Beach County Environmental Resources Management or Health Departments and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation." 2. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Special Policy 5.4 (page 3-11) was amended to read as follows: "Special Policy 5.4: Require all new developments in Planning Areas 1 and 6A to perform an environmental assessment to define potential impacts upon the viability of vegetative species and/or habitats delineated on Figures 3-13B and C. The impact assessment shall include necessary techniques and/or controls to maintain species and/or habitats in their current condition or mitigate potential impacts. Further, require all new development in Planning Areas 1 and 6A to perform topographic surveys as a means of determining current flood hazard potential and defining flood prevention measures." 3. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Special Policies 5.8 to 5.13 (page 3-11A) were added to read as follows: "Special Policy 5.8: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.2 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 98 residential units." "Special Policy 5.9: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.3 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 232 residential units." "Special Policy 5.10-: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.4 on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 184 residential units." "Special Policy 5.11: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.5A on revised FIGURE 3-10 shall be limited to a maximum of 108 residential units." "Special Policy 5.12: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.1 on revised FIGURE 3-3 shall be limited to the existing 197 residential units." IV-1 6 "Special Policy 5.13: Residential development on the property defined by Amendment 92-1.6 on revised FIGURE 3-12 shall be limited to the existing 48 residential units." 4. CONSERVATION ELEMENT, Policy 5.2 (page 8-5) was added to read as follows: "Policy 5.2: By FY 1994, determine the historical existence of Manatees within Village waterways and mortality rates related thereto. Pending the results of the above analyses, meet with the Florida Department of Natural Resources (FDNR) and the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management to determine if additional protective measures are required. Further, upon completion of the Manatee Protection program for Palm Beach County, incorporate pertinent control measures within the Village's Comprehensive P.lan." 5. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT, Policy 1.10 (page 10-4) was added to read as follows: "Policy 1.10: By FY 1992, the Village shall coordinate with the City of Palm Beach Gardens in an effort to jointly identify contributing impacts upon Burns Road and RCA Boulevard and define any future improvements needs and responsibilities." E. AMENDMENT 92-2 Amendment 92-2 was adopted to: (1) Correct an inconsistency between the Village's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) and the Conservation Future Land Use category within the Comprehensive Plan; (2) correct scrivener errors within the Comprehensive Plan; (3) incorporate permanent Traffic Circulation Level -of -Service (LOS) Standards within the Comprehensive Plan; and (4) insure internal consistency between Comprehensive Plan elements resulting from the amendments. 1. Conservation Future Land Use Category Amendment Village Ordinance No. 24-91 (July 13, 1991) amended Section 45-32.2B, C-OS Conservation;=and Open Space District of Appendix C - Zoning (Village Code of Ordinances) to include single-family dwellings, along with customary accessory buildings at a density of one unit per upland acre and have at least one lot dimension, width or length, of a minimum of 150 feet. To insure consistency between Ordinance 24-91 and the Comprehensive Plan, TABLE 3-1 (page 3-13) of the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT was revised as shown on TABLE 2. TABLE 2 - AMENDMENT 92-2 REVISION TO TABLE 3-1 FUTURE LAND USE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM For purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the following land use classifications, which are applicable to North Palm Beach, are used to describe existing future land uses in the Village. The classifications are consistent with those defined in Chapter 9J5, F.A.C. and concurrent with the Village's perception of use. Residential: Commercial: Recreation/ Open Space: Conservation/ Open Space: Public Build- ings & Grounds: Educational: Other Public Facilities: Transporta- tion: Water: Source: LRM, Inc., 2/88; 3/92 Land uses and activities within land areas used predominantly for housing and excluding all tourist accommodations. Land uses and activities within land areas which are predominantly related to the sale; rental and distribution of products and the provision e€ or performance of services. Land uses and activities within land areas where recreation occurs and lands which are either developed or vacant and concerned primarily with active or passive recreational use. Land uses and activities within land areas "designated" for the primary purpose of conserving or protecting natural resources or environmental quality, and includes areas designated for such purposes, or combinations thereof, as passive recreation, flood control, protection of quality or quantity of ground water or surface water, flood plain management, fisheries management, and/or protection of vegetative community or wildlife habitats. Permitted land uses shall include single-family housing units. Lands and structures that are owned, leased, or operated by a government entity, such as libraries, police stations, fire stations, post offices, government administration buildings, and areas used for associated storage of vehicles and equipment. Also, lands and structures owned or operated by a private entity and used for a public purpose such as a privately held but publically regulated utility. Land use activities and facilities of public or private primary or secondary schools, vocational and technical schools, and colleges and universities licensed by the Florida Department of Education, including the areas of buildings, campus open space, dormitories, recreational facilities or parking. Land uses and activities within land areas concerned with other public or private facilities and institutions such as churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, homes for the aged and infirm, and other similar uses. Land areas and uses devoted to the movement of goods and people including streets and associated rights -of -way. All areas covered by water or any right-of-way for the purpose of conveying or storing water. Rev: 10/16/89; NPBCP Amendment 92-2 IV-1 8 2. Scrivener Error Amendments Scrivener error Future Land Use Map Series amendments are listed in TABLE 3 and scrivener error text amendments are listed in TABLE 4. 3. Permanent Traffic Circulation Level -of -Service (LOS) Standard Amendments. Policy 1.5 (page 4-2) of the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT required the Village to establish permanent LOS standards. As a result of analyses prepared: (1) TABLE 4-1 (page 4-9) and TABLE 4-2 (page 4-10) were added to the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT; and (2) Policies 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 of the TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT were deleted and replaced with the following: "Policy 1.1: Based upon the Florida Highway System Plan, Village roadways shall be functionally grouped based upon the number of traffic signals per mile as follows: a. Group A - County Road A-1-A; b. Group B - Prosperity Farms Road; c. Group C - U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake Boulevard; and d. Village Collector - Lighthouse Drive. The Building Official may require traffic impact analyses prepared pursuant to the Village Concurrency Management Ordinance to account for adjustments to the functional group classification of a particular roadway necessitated by the placement of additional traffic signals along classified roadways. If said adjustments result in a functional group other than A, B, or C, then the level of service analyses shall be based upon the 1988 Florida Highway System Plan Level -of -Service Standards and Guidelines Manual." "Policy 1.2: The Village hereby adopts Average Annual Daily/Peak Hour LOS Standards, consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation minimum acceptable operating levels of service standards, for each of the following listed roadways: a. County Road A-1-A - D/D; b. Prosperity Farms Road - D/D; c. U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake Boulevard - D/D; and d. Lighthouse Drive - D/D. The evaluation of current and proposed levels of service on functionally grouped roadways shall be based upon Level -of - Service D traffic volumes in TABLES 4-1 and 4-2. Further, should the level of service on County Road A-1-A fall below D/D, the Village shall pursue "Constrained Facility" designation thereon." IV-1 9 TABLE 3 - LIST OF AMENDMENT 92-2 MAP SCRIVENER ERROR AMENDMENTS Figure No. 3-2,3-3,3-4, 3-5,3-6,3-7, 3-8,3-9 and 3-11 NPBCP Page No. 3-17,3-19,3-20 3-21,3-22,3-23 3-24 and 3-26 Propose Amendment Within the Key of each Figure, amend "Refer to Land Use Tables 3-27 and 3-28" to read as follows: "Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2". 3-6 3-21 Add the Future Land •Use designation letter "C" to the commercial lot where previously omitted. 3-7 3-22 Add an asterisk to Florida State Master File Ref. No. 8PB107 and a footnote which shall read as follows: "The Oakes Building no longer exists; however, reference shall be retained until deleted from the Florida Master Site File". a SCRIVENER Amendments Scrivener k a E 0 a. z IMPROVEMENT, as w Sa O O � 0 U E E 4-1 'ID •C a •*� 4D E 34, ro a) O sx a 4-) as 344 ro ••-+ CD .*-► a .• I O a c Sa .0 .-•1 -1 A+ rf CD 4-4 4) 0 O LO rp • S.1 • a • CO O '» • • 0•4 •••+ 3.1 CO r1 • •▪ a • • . I . • .. . procurEed ...procurred... "buildable" 4.) .m4 C ul ro E E a W U 0 .,.4 a a m U ro x C I a a ALV W a, .r-1 ro m CO $1,a rzt CD IX 43 • . • a n • E Rs- o a x d 1 b .0 c �� tO . O • A • 3-10, Line 22 • ro co U a' a tm 4-) cIl C 1 ro rH (!3 a) xi I 0 a� m 3.4 Z o mH xw • O N 0 . . incurred pEeeuEEed .44 .* a •* - 444 ro 444 •+-r CD U 1 9.4 an 44 O 44 .4I 0 r11 b▪ • •4+ 10 a •...+ A E+ as By FY 1990 C-17 canal on cD . . • . .-4 t1 ro -r-4 A 0 • 0,. CO ., •. • It O V 'Q . U m CD r•I 4 • 'C3 3a ••••1 RS O CO sa O .,4 0) I -I ,4OU A.� ' 1 0 • 0 a4-r . • 34 .O 4-4 ?, • A. E+O La• N 'r ri +-I N t0 • a a a a) a a s~ .� .� .� •,4 .. a a a a a s` I U1 N fn I I I I 1 I to LC) fn to t0 t0 Sa 0) CD r•I 4-t .-I r0 -.•a A $a O fa ro0CP a 434304 a_• aa.zfa co 43 a) Is $4 t71 as Os O as as ro s4 ..-1 4-) v O sa 0 at m •r+ •*-+ a a 4 O C f-I ro 4.3 O U . 0 neon a itl cDa O. 0 (Continued) Amendments Scrivener Lakeside including7fisheries .a) a a . • tn • a •� x 0 • 'CI $.4 •rI • •r+ O 0 rt. r c $4 $4 ,1 a a a o u -� U] W a U -ri sa 0 a • O • r • • U ] . U1 •.,..i . 4.4 a •ri ri lD Conservation O co a 4.) • O • N • • CT • Cri • • a, • a, • �.� r r 4 (tf zs 1:$ a JM .,..I ?+ •r+ E W PI $4 0 0 O r-I r-I U GQ L4 a] w N CO Cr) I I I 0 0 0 r I r-I r-I O "Policy 1.3: Prior to permitting any additional expansion of Prosperity Farms Road, the Village shall re-evaluate Level - of -Service Standards thereon. Further, in order to maintain the residential character of the Village, all roadways not identified in Policy 1.1 shall be maintained as two-laned local roadways." Addendum TABLES 4-1 and 4-2 (pages 4-9 and 4-10) are shown in TABLES 5 and 6. 4. Internal Consistency Amendments In order to assure the internal consistency of the Comprehensive Plan, several policies were revised to accommodate other 92-2 amendments. Revised policies are listed as follows: a. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Policy 1.3a., b. and c. (page 3-4) was revised to read as follows: "a. Conservation/Open Space - Maximum of one unit per upland acre; b. Low density residential - fewer than 5.80 residential units per gross acre; c. Medium density residential - 5.81 to 11.0 residential units per gross acre; d. High density residential - 11.1 to 24.0 residential units per gross acre." b. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Policy 1.7 (page 3-6) was as revised to read as follows: "Policy 1.7: Future development within the designated Urban Service Area shall be permitted only when central water and wastewater systems are available or will be provided concurrent with the impacts of development." c. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Policy 3.3 (page 3-8) was revised to read as follows: "Policy 3.3: All properties within the designated Urban Service Area not utilizing -central water and wastewater systems shall be governed by the provisions of: (1) Chapter 381.272, Florida Administrative Code; (2) Chapter 10D-6, Florida Administrative Code; and (3) Palm Beach County Environmental Control Rule - 1, which regulate the use and installation of individual sewage disposal systems." d. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Special Policy 5.14 (page 3-11A) was added to read as follows: IV-23 TABLE 5 - AMENDMENT 92-2 ADDITION OF TABLE 4-1 ')IL -GE OF NORTH ,L:1 =EACH GENERAL: DA I L _E�-'EL OF SERVICE MAXIMUM J 0 L�M ? L E 3 � �.., '. Group A - 0.0 to 0.75 •E i n i.: ed 1 n ter _.ec t; on = per Mile Roadway: County Road A1A (CR Lanes/ Level of Service ' E Type i r �+ 1 2/Undiv. 13700 15000 15600 16500 17400 3/Undiv.* 17125 18750 19500 20625 21750 4/Undiv. 28310 30305 31350 33155 34865 5/Undiv.** 29800 31900 33000 34900 36700 4/Div. 29800 31900 33000 34900 36700 6/Div. 45400 48100 49700 52400 55200 Group 8 - 0.76 to 1.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile Roadway: Prosperity Farms Road (2 current signalization) Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type 1 A 2/Undiv. 9000 13700 14500 15300 16100 3/Undiv.* 11250 17125 18125 19125 20125 4/Undiv. 19000 28215 29450 30875 32300 5/Undiv.** 20000 29700 31000 32500 34000 4/Div. 20000 29700 31000 32500 34000 6/Div. 30600 45100 46700 48900 51200 Group C - 1.6 to 2.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile Roadway: (1) U.S. Highway 1 (SR 5) (2) Northlake Boulevard (SR 850) (3) Prosperity Farms Road (w/additional Signal) Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type 1 A*** 8 C D E l 3/Undiv.* 4/Undiv. . 5/Undiv.** 4/Div. 6/Div. 12750 16875 18500 19625 21660 28025 30115 31730 22800 29500 31700 33400 22800 29500 31700 33400 35100 45000 47900 50300 Village Collector Roadway: Lighthouse Drive Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type 1 A*** B*** 0 2/Undiv. - 7700 11600 12900 3 ;Undiv . * - - 9425 14500 16125 4/Undi v . - - 16200 24300 26400 1 * Assume three lane capacity at 125 percent 74 a two-lane capaci ty faci i i' y. ** Assumed 5 lane undivided fac i i i t` equal to a 4 lane divided facility. *** If "-", it is assumed that the LOS indicated cannot be Achieved. Source: Florida Highway Sy= .em'P1 an Level of Ser" i re Standards and Guidelines Manual,. F' . De_ t . of T raripar t,..t i on, 1982 Addendum: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 IV-24 TABLE 6 - AMENDMENT 92-2 ADDITION OF TABLE 4-2 TABLE 4-2 VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR LEVEL Et OF SERVICE MAXIMUM VOLUMES ME. Group A - 0.0 to 0.75 Signalized intersections per Mite Roadway: County Road A1A (CR AlA) Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type 1 A 8 C D 2/Undiv. 1310 1440 1490 1580 1670 3/Undiv.* 1638 1800 1862 1975 2088 4/Undiv. 2717 2916 3012 3182 3354 5/Und1v . ** 2860 3070 3170 3350 3530 4/Div. 2860 3070 3170 3350 3530 6/Div. . 4350 4620 4770 5030 5300 Group B - 0.76 to 1.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile Roadway: Prosperity Farms Road Cal current signalization) Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type 1 A 8 C D 2/Undiv. 870 1310 1390 1470 1540 3/Undiv.* 1088 1638 1738 1838 1925 4/Undiv. 1824 2708 2822 2964 3106 5/Undiv.** 1920 2850 2970 3120 3270 4/Div. 1920 2850 2970 3120 3270 6/Div. 2930 4330 4480 4700 4910 Group C - 1.6 to 2.5 Signalized Intersections per Mile Roadway: (1) U.S. Highway 1 (SR 5) (2) Nor t h l ak a Boulevard (SR 850) (3) Prosperity Farms Rd. (w/additional signal) Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type 1 A*** 8 C D 3/Undiv . * - 1225 1613 1775 1888 4/Undiv. - 2080 2638 2888 3050 5/Undiv.** 2190 2830 3040 3210 4/Div. - 2190 2830 3040 3210 6/Div. - 3370 4320 4600 4830 Village Collector Roadway: Lighthouse Drive Lanes/ 1 Level of Service Type I A*** B*4* C D E 1 2/Undiv.- - 720 1 1 1 0 1 240 3/Undiv . * - - 912 1388 1550 4./Un d i ,v . - - 2390 S5 f 0 3850 Assume three lane capacity at 125 per=ent of a two-lane capacity faci l :t; . ** Assumed 5 lane •.ind i v i ded facility equal to a 4 lane divided 'Lac i 1 1 ty . . *** If u-u , it . -A _'.�suine'd that the LO` ! n d i c..zed cannot be achieved. Source: Florida Highway _' tem P' an Lava ; of '=er.. ; ce Standards Addendum: NPBCPand '3u ::de nes_, 7' . Dept or 7r.a,: _.por ..at i cn 1 9 3 Amendment 92-2 ' IV-25 "Special Policy 5.14: Residential development in Planning Area a shall be clustered in the least environmentally sensitive portion of the parcel which is the subject of an application for a development order." e. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, Special Policy 5.15 (page 3-11A) was added to read as follows: "Special Policy 5.15: Year-round, permanent resident residential development within the area defined by the current extent of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park shall be limited to that provided for Park personnel." f. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT, Policy 1.4. (page 6-5) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 1.4: By FY 1990, update Village Land Development Regulations to prohibit the installation of additional septic tank systems within the Village. Further, require all new developments within the designated Urban Service Area to be served by the central potable water and wastewater system. The provision of water and wastewater services within Planning Area 1 shall be governed by Policy 6.2 of the Capital Improvements Element." g. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT, TABLE 6-1 (page 6-3) was amended to read as shown in TABLE 7. h. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT, TABLE 11-1 (page 11-9) was amended to read as shown in TABLE 8. i. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT, Policy 6.2 (page 11-13) was amended to read as follows: "Policy 6.2: Village Planning Area 1, where the level of facilities and services provided by North Palm Beach shall be limited to those currently provided, shall not be designated as an Urban Service Area. Notwithstanding the above limitations, individual or package potable water systems may be provided to accommodate allowable development. Further, package wastewater systems may be provided to accommodate allowable development." F. AMENDMENT 96-1 Amendment 96-1 consists of six Srvall-Scale amendments to: (1) Update the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate parcels recently annexed by the Village; and (2) correct a map error regarding a previous annexation. IV-26 Amendments 96-1.1 through 96-1.4 are located on MAP 22 and summarized in TABLE 7. Related Future Land Use Map Series (FIGURES 3-3 and 3-10) amendments are shown on MAPS 23 and 24. G. SUMMARY OF EFFECTS UPON EXISTING LAND USE DATA Future Land Use Map Series amendments resulted in changes to existing land use patterns in the Village. The effects of these changes (i.e. to the 1989 base data) upon the land use inventory are incorporated within the inventory illustrated in TABLE 8. Further revisions to TABLE 8, as well as revisions to the Existing Land Use Map Series, to incorporate development activity during the 1989 - 1996 period, are discussed in SECTION V. IV-27 Ai LOCATION H z w z A z w 1 N N • ID N On U of C 4.1 ►-4 C ..E E 'fl It C ..] C! E •• rt Da v a •• M > o m DICK IV-28 TABLE 7 - SMALL-SCALE AMENDMENT 96-1 SUMMARY VILL. MAP PLG. CURRENT FLU* SIZE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED FLU** REF. AREA DESIGNATION (Acres) STATUS DESIGNATION 96-1.1 2 HR 18 0.345 Developed Educational 96-1.2 2 CH/8 1.500 Developed Commercial 96-1.3A 2 HR 18 1.210 Developed Educational 96-1.3B 2 HR 8 6.170 Developed ' Educational 96-1.3C 2 HR 8 0.090 Developed Educational 96-1.4 6A LR 3 0.500 Undeveloped Low Density Residential TOTAL 9.815 FOOTNOEES: FLU* - Palm Beach County Future Land Use Plan. FLU** - Village Of North Palm Beach Future Land USe Plan. ir- `l- I• ummus •.t !21 '-1 :4 -4 : -4 3 _ ! 3 96- 96-1.3 I • • , :3 :1 '^�• c.v - _ .-.., Ulu Willi I I. \� \ Z.:. ‘,./ LL.U. 1=lil111lt1i` • 0 1100 co C'_ _=1 1 MAP 23 ,4 '. MAP AMENDMENTS fi 92-1.1 - Twelve Oaks • 96-1.1 - Benjamin School 96-1.2 - Commercial 96-1.3 - Benjamin School em KEY: • r, � s f, f f < %1� rrrr • 4011, ' rrrrr 41.. ft. Cordorate 1 inr t-________ Planning Area 3aundary /...".....l.i..9Y6 Beier to Land Use Tables 3-11i d 3-2 Re4er to !p.cial Poiic7 0+++"W+ ,.aenwtn t 3oundar' no no s NM s t FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 2 - AMENDMENT 96-1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3-3 , \ URCE . 1RM , Inc. Rev: +mercmar,:z ? - , 96- . . IV-30 MAP 24 — AMENDMENT 9 6 — 1 REVISION TO FIGURE 3 — 1 0 - ' = 3 ;0 ,ttttttttttttttttttttttttt,tl _ isi4tss sans - �■ 1` = Corporate l irei t : i 92-1 .: t 1 Planning Area Boundary•1••n•••••••a•••••• _' 1 PROSPERITY i RBOR .40R T ;; 111= Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2 ;f 33.4 Acres 11= Refer to Special Policy 3.3 .-4.4.-..N 1 98 SF lin i ts 11= Anenchen t Boundary .n as s s s :11 R-3(C:,) to RL(N.P,3) 11: 1 �555��v.5511; :lg.s tetttttttttt :,....,_ \'',,c:,, .„,„„„„„ ttttttt-• � -;:\•.. '_ _tit;,:.\\,\..\\._. ,...\\<\,\„\\\\\\\,,,,,\,\„,,,,.\\,,,i. � ,\.1- .,.. \.,.\\ \'..\\'<,\\:':\\\:, - . • • ,, As :Lit,.. \ - _; tt f ad s ttt. AO _,1 K—v r YQNE' :SAC SANCTUARY BAY '' Zig 24.8 Acres 41 232 MF Un, ts t: < .a • ?,t . %y 1 MAP AMENDMENTS 92-1.2 - Prosperity Harbor North 92-1.3 - Sanctuary Bay 92-1.4 - Sanctuary Cove 92-1.5A- Prosperity Harbor South 92-1.5B- Village Park 96-1.4 - Prosperity Harbor North -:a.:_:As_. :1 ::: S 4iCTiWW( CDVE` 15.3 Acres '184 MF Units RL to RH rx r r IV-31 TABLE 8 REVISED 1989 EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY INCORPORATING FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENTS THROUGH 96-1 Land Use Residential Low Density (0-5.8/acre) Medium Density (5.81 -1 1 .0 /acre ) High Density (1 1 .1 -24.0/acre ) Commercial Rec./Open Space Cons./Open Space Public Buildings And Grounds Transportation Water Area In Total % Of Developed % Of. Acres Acres Area Total Area 586.19 45.12 173.72 144.87 196.98 384.70 805.03 144.87 196.98 384.70 14.08 14.08 269.98 269.98 1,225.10 1,225.10 25.8 24.3 4.5 4.4 6.4 6.0 12.4 11.7 0.5 0.5 8.7 8.7 39.3 37.1 Total Developed 3,115.55 100.0 Vacant 184.47 5.6 TOTAL 3,300.02 100.0 Source: Revised TABLE 3-5; Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation; Amendment 92-1; and Amendment 96-1. SECTION V CONDITION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS AT TIME OF SUBMITTAL -1996 A. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (1 ) Existing Land Use Data Requirement (a) The existing land use map. (b) The maps depicting natural (c) The table of existing land density/intensity. (f) The adjacent land uses and state concern. Summary resources. use acreage and designated areas of critical A majority of the soils underlying the Village are sandy, with drainage characteristics ranging from poor to excessive. However, natural formations have been significantly modified by urban development in large portions of the Village. Altered soil types are referred to as "Urban Complexes" and "quartzipsamments". Areas within the Village most affected by the limiting conditions of naturally occurring soils are the ocean beaches and tidal swamps located east of the Intracoastal Waterway. The distribution of generalized soil types within the Village is illustrated on EXHIBIT A-1. EXHIBIT A-2 graphically depicts flood zone designations within the Village. It is noted that related flood maps were prepared using U.S.G.S. maps that predated the filling of some of Planning Area 6A. Therefore, EXHIBIT A-2 may not accurately reflect flooding conditions therein. On EXHIBIT A-2, the 100-year flood boundary corresponds with the darkest pattern. According to the Flood Insurance Study prepared for the Village: "Natural drainage throughout most of the study area is relatively good, and the few low areas lie close to canals. The removal of storm runoff is facilitated by several man-made canals, including the Intracoastal Waterway, the C-17 Canal and. the North Palm Beach Waterway. Many smaller waterways flow into these main canals. In addition to this manmade drainage system, the study area contains several bodies of surface water". Although most areas within the Village have been converted to an urban development status, there are three areas where native vegetation remains significantly evident: 1. The area located east of the Intracoastal Waterway; 2. Grass beds in Lake Worth; and 3. The northwesternmost portion of the Village, in the area west of the North Palm Beach Waterway, north. and south of Teal Way West. V-1 Areas containing significant native vegetation remain unchanged from the time of adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan are illustrated on EXHIBITS A-3.1, A-3.2 and A-3.3. The major water bodies in the Village are the Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway, North Palm Beach Waterway, Lake Worth and the Earman River (C-17 Canal). In addition, there are many small manmade finger canals, constructed for the purpose of access, connecting these waterways. The Village also contains several artificial surface water bodies which include North Lake, West Lake, Prosperity Harbor and the North Palm Beach Yacht Club Marina. Surface water bodies within the Village remain unchanged since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan and are illustrated on EXHIBIT A-4, while beaches, shores and the estuarine waters of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park are illustrated on EXHIBITS B-1, A-3.1 and A-3.3. North Palm Beach was incorporated in 1956 as a totally planned community and has developed essentially as originally designed. There are slightly more than 3,228 total acres, or 5.04 square miles contained within the corporate limits. The Village is nearly built -out. Only 5.4% of the total area is vacant and potentially available for future development. Water areas constitute a substantial portion (37.90) of the total area of the Village. The classification system used to inventory existing land use patterns within the Village is displayed in TABLE 9, while the existing land use inventory, derived by the application of the system to the incorporated area is presented in TABLE 10. Existing land use patterns in the Village are mapped on EXHIBITS B-3 through B-15. Abutting land uses within adjacent jurisdictions are also illustrated on EXHIBITS B-5 through B- 15. There are no lands designated "Area of Critical State Concern" within the Village. Further, according to the Florida Inland Navigation District (F.I.N.D.), there are no existing dredge disposal sites within the Village limits. There are four sites (three --archaeological sites and an historic building) within the Village listed on the Florida Master File, one of which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Each is located, accompanied by its Florida Master File Number, on the appropriate existing land use map (Ref: EXHIBITS B-5 and B-10). Historical resident population growth within the Village is presented in TABLE 11. The current (4/1/95) year-round population is estimated at 11,844 residents. This figure is substantially less than the 12,782 (4/1/87) residents projected in the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation. V-2 TABLE 9 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM For purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the following land use classifications, Which are applicable to North Palm Beach, are used to describe existing future land uses in the Village. The classifications are consistent with those defined in Chapter 9J5, E.A.C. and concurrenc with the Villages perception of use. Residential: Commercial: Recreation/ Open Space: Conservation/ Open Space: Public Build- ings & Grounds: Educational: Other Public Facilities: Transporta- tion: Water: Source: LRM, Inc., 2/88; 3/92 Land uses and activities within land areas used predominantly for housing and excluding all tourist accommodations. Land uses and activities within land areas which are predominantly related to the sale; rental and distribution of products and the provision ef or performance of services. Land uses and activities within land areas where recreation occurs and lands which are either developed or vacant and concerned primarily with active or passive recreational use. Land uses and activities within land areas "designated" for the primary purpose of conserving or protecting natural resources or environmental quality, and includes areas designated for such purposes, or combinations thereof, as passive recreation, flood control, protection of quality or quantity of ground water or surface water, flood plain management, fisheries management, and/or protection of vegetative community or wildlife habitats. Permitted land uses shall include single-family housing units. Lands and structures that are owned, leased, or operated by a government entity, such as libraries, police stations, fire stations, post offices, government administration buildings, and areas used for associated storage of vehicles and equipment. Also, lands and structures owned or operated by a private entity and used for a public purpose such as a privately held but publically regulated utility. Land use activities and facilities of public or private primary or secondary schools, vocational and technical schools, and colleges and universities licensed by the Florida Department of Education, including the areas of buildings, campus open space, dormitories, recreational .facilities or parking. Land uses and activities within land areas concerned with other public or private facilities and institiftions such as churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, homes for the aged and infirm, and other similar uses. Land areas and uses devoted to the movement of goods and people including streets and associated rights -of -way. All areas covered by water or any right-of-way for the purpose of conveying or storing water. Rev: 10/16/89; NPBCP Amendment 92-2 V-3 TABLE 10 1996 EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY Land Use Residential Low Density (0-5.8/acre) Medium Density (5.81 -1 1 .0 /acre ) High Density (1 1 .1 -2 4.0 /acre ) Area In Total % Of Developed % Of Acres Acres Area Total Area 591 .54 45.12 174.05 810.71 26.5 25.1 Commercial 157.66 157.66 5.2 4.9 Rec./Open Space 196.98 -196.98 6.4 6.1 Cons./Open Space 384.70 384.70 12.6 11.9 Public Buildings And Grounds 14.08 14.08 0.5 0.4 Transportation 269.98 269.98 8.8 8.4 Water 1,225.10 1,225.10 40.0 38.0 Total Developed 3,059.21 100.0 Vacant 169.08 5.2 TOTAL 3,228.29 100.0 Source: Revised TABLE 3-5; Village of North Palm Beach Support Documentation; Amendment 92-1; Amendment 96-1; and field survey, 2/96. Year 1960 (1) 1970(1) 1980 (1) 1990 (1) 1993(2) 1994 (3) 1995 (3) FOOTNOTES: TABLE 11 PERMANENT RESIDENT POPULATION ESTIMATES Palm Beach North Palm Beach County Total Total County Share (%) 238,106 2,864 348,993 9,035 576,758 11,344 863,503 11,343 - 11,446 937,190 11,836 962,802 11,844 1.2 2.6 2.0 2.0 1.3 1 .2 1. U.S. Census 2. Special Census Count; January, 1993. 3. University of Florida Bureau of Business and Economic Research; April 1st of each year. Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/96. Estimates made prior to 1990 were based upon updates to the 1980 Census. The 1990 Census established the Village population at 11,343 residents. Further, a Special Census completed in 1993 established the population at 11,446 residents. Future estimates by the University of Florida, Bureau of Business and Economic Research will be based upon the 1990 Census figure. Potential reasons for the unexpectedly low Census count are: 1. Previous undercount of the number of units used for seasonal and/or occasional purposes; 2. Declining household size due to the aging of the population; and 3. Creation of empty -nester households, as older children leave the household. Pertinent demographic comparisons with Palm Beach County are as follows: 1. Median household and family income within the Village is substantially higher than Palm Beach County as a whole. In 1989, median household income within the Village ($38,464) was estimated to be 118% of that ($32,524) witnessed countywide, while median family income ($49,389) was 128% of the countywide figure ($38,539). 2. Median age within the Village (53.0 years) is higher than the County (39.9 years) as a whole. Differences in age distribution are evident within the younger age group (0-20 years) and working age group (21-64 years), where the Village has a lower percentage and the retirement age -group (65+ years) where the Village has a higher rate than countywide averages. 3. Housing units in the Village are predominantly owner - occupied, with a higher proportion of owners (77.6%) versus renters (22.4) than the countywide rates (75.3% owners versus 24.7% renters). Current maximum -day seasonal (including tourists) population within the Village is estimated at 1,686 persons. (2) Land Use Analysis Requirement (a) The availability of facilities and services to serve existing land uses. (b) The vacant land analysis. V-6 Summary Potable water and wastewater service are provided by the Seacoast Utilities Authority through central systems which are adequately serving existing development in the Village. System operators state that current capacities are available to serve a build - out situation in the Village. Individual wells and septic tanks serve some individual residences in the Village (estimated 22 lots). These systems are concluded to be adequate to serve current demands. No specific problems have been identified by the Palm Beach County Health Department regarding their use in the Village. Solid waste collection services are provided by the North Palm Beach Public Services Department, with some commercial establishments served by private contractors. The Village is currently being efficiently served by the department. Services are normally expanded to accommodate growth on an "as needed" basis. Drainage and transportation facilities (roads and streets) are in place and adequately serving existing development. A Master Drainage Study was proposed in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. However, this study has not been completed as of this date. The Village currently lies outside of the Restrictive Contour Zones of the Richard Road wellfield. Therefore, aquifer recharge is not an issue. However, drawdown contours should be reviewed periodically to determine if Village restrictions need to be implemented. The only road within the Village with a potential level -of -service problem is that segment of Prosperity Farms Road between RCA Boulevard and Northlake Boulevard. Calculation of remaining resident and seasonal population growth potential, based upon the buildout of remaining unbuilt units, is presented in TABLE 12. Using data from TABLE -fit, permanent resident population projections, assuming a residential build -out situation within 5.0 years, are presented in the following table: Permanent Year Residents 1995 11,844 2000 12,833 2005 '12,833 Maximum -day seasonal (including tourists) resident population projections are presented in the following table: V-7 TABLE 12 REMAINING RESIDENTIAL GROWTH POTENTIAL Planning Development Potential (Units) Population Potential Area Low Medium High Low(1) Medium(2) High(2) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 10 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 8 6 206 232 184 360 331 262 7 10 0 0 17 0 0 TOTALS 223 232 190 389 331 270 FOOTNOTES: (1) 0.82 resident household rate x 2.13 persons per household. (2) 0.82 resident household rate x 1.74 persons per household. TOTAL REMAINING RESIDENT POPULATION GROWTH POTENTIAL - 989. REMAINING PEAK DAY NON-RESIDENT GROWTH POTENTIAL: 13% of total units x 1.89 persons per household = 158 non-residents. Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/96. Seasonal Year Residents 1995 1,686 2000 1,824 2000 1,824 Total maximum -day population projections (resident plus maximum - day seasonal), used for certain facilities planning purposes, are presented in the following table: Total Maximum -Day Year Residents 1995 13,510 2000 14,657 2005 14,657 A summary of existing vacant lands within the Village is presented in TABLE 13. Residential, commercial, recreation/open space and conservation/open space properties, based upon current zoning designations, are defined as vacant. In terms of development limitations (soils, topography, natural resources, historic resources, etc.) all vacant land within Planning Areas 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are determined to be suitable for development. Vacant land within Planning Area 1 consists of Little Munyon Island, a 4 acre spoil island which is zoned C/OS - Conservation/Open Space. This parcel is currently in private ownership. Seagrass beds located to the east of the of the property represent the most significant limiting factor to development, in addition to the lack of access and available urban services. Vacant land in Planning Area 6A (142.0 acres) comprises 84% of the total within the Village, and 97% of the vacant residential land. The suitability of the scale and location of development in Planning Area 6A has been determined through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) review process. Four large-scale PUDs comprise all of the vacant lands in Planning Area 6A. All four are within various stages of the development process and are projected to be builtout during the 1995-2000 period. According to EXHIBIT A-2, a large portion of high density area is within the Flood Zone A designation and includes mangrove concentrations. It was stated, however, that flood maps for this area may not be accurate due to filling operations which occurred after base maps were prepared. V-9 TABLE 13 VACANT LANDS SUMMARY (Acres) Planning Residential Area C/OS(1) R/OS(2) Commercial Low Medium High 1 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 5.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 0.00 0.00 7.04 1.09 0.00 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 1.67 0.25 0.00 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.40 6 0.00 3.82 - 0.00 96.90 29.80 15.30 7 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.45 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 4.00 3.82 15.37 100.39 29.80 15.70 TOTAL VACANT LAND - 169.08 ACRES FOOTNOTES: (1) Conservation/Open Space (2) Recreation/Open Space Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/96. Also, intermittent mangrove stands exist along the North Palm Beach Waterway in the southern portion of the North Palm Beach Waterway and the southern portion of the Planning Area contains several oak trees. Related projects have been designed to preserve and/or mitigate vegetative species. Soil types and related characteristics indicate that the eastern portion of Planning Area 6A is "somewhat poorly drained". However, the use of the planned unit development approach and maintenance of Village standards regarding the height of first floor elevations will permit development to occur at densities projected. Land use projections, to determine the amount of land necessary to accommodate future population growth, are presented in TABLE 14. Projections are made to 2005; however, residential buildout is projected to occur in 2000. Field surveys undertaken as part of the HOUSING ELEMENT indicate that the housing stock is in good condition. Normal maintenance should preclude the need for redevelopment activities during the 5 and 10 year planning periods. Further, most commercial properties appear viable and in good condition. There are some exceptions along Northlake Boulevard, the Twin City Mall in particular. Further discussion of this situation is presented in SECTION VII. Designated flood zones are illustrated on EXHIBIT A-2. Low-lying areas within the Village generally fall within the 5 feet to 10 feet msl range of elevations, while the base flood elevation is defined by the Federal Insurance Administration as the 100 year storm event. Coastal areas, properties fronting inland canals and property in Planning Area 6A are most potentially affected. The Village has recognized flooding potential by requiring an 8.5 feet msl minimum first floor elevation for all structures. All structures within the Village have been erected at, or above this elevation, according to the Public Services Director. Further, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has stated that the highest flood elevation in "Lake Worth within the Village limits was 7 feet 4 inches msl. Based upon this information, it is concluded that existing structures within the Village are protected from flooding and that redevelopment will not be necessary as a result of a 100-year storm event. As previously stated, existing flood maps do not accurately reflect existing conditions in Planning Area 6A. As a result, development may proceed in this area provided that first floor elevations are constructed at, or above 8.5 msl. V-11 Land Use Residential Low Density (0-5.8/acre) Medium Density (5.81 -1 1 .0/acre ) High Density (1 1 .1 -2 4.0 /acre ) TABLE 14 LAND USE PROJECTIONS 1996 2000 2005 Area In Area In Area In Acres Acres Acres 591 .54 45.12 174.05 691 .93 74.92 189.75 691 .93 74.92 189.75 Commercial 157.66 165.16 172.31 Rec./Open Space 196.98 200.80 200.80 Cons./Open Space 384.70 384.70 384.70 Public Buildings And Grounds 1 4.0 8 1 4.8 0 1 4.8 0 Transportation 269.98 269.98 269.98 Vacant 169.08 1 1 .1 5 4.00 Water 1,225.10 1,225.10 1,225.10 TOTAL 3,228.29 3,228.29 3,228.29 Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/96 B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT (1) Existing Traffic Circulation Data Requirement (a, b, and c) The new existing traffic circulation map utilizing FDOT functional classifications and depicting number of lanes for each functionally classified roadway. Summary The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) functional classification system has been repealed and replaced by the Federal Functional Classification System (FFCS). The application of the FFCS to the street system within the Village, is illustrated on MAP 25. Descriptions of each of the major road segments, including the FFCS, laneage, maintenance responsibility and right-of-way width, is presented in TABLE 15. The Village contains arterials (urban minor), urban collectors and local streets. No limited access roadways are located within the Village, nor are there any ports, rail lines, high speed rail lines or related facilities. The Village has no planned, integrated bicycle path system in place at this time. However, one path currently extends from Teal Way and Prosperity Farms Road to the North Palm Beach Community Center and another path runs along the east side of U.S. Highway No. 1 to the northern corporate limits. These facilities were constructed jointly by the Village and Palm Beach County. The Palm Beach County Transportation Authority (PALMTRAN) currently operates bus routes through the Village. Various routes are available, according to specific time schedules, to destinations throughout Palm Beach County. The Parker Bridge on U.S. Highway No. 1, at the Intracoastal Waterway, is the only bascule bridge within the Village. When the bridge is in the open position, congestion and traffic stacking does occur. (2) Traffic Circulation Analysis Requirement (a) The existing traffic circulation levels of service and system needs. (b) The projected traffic circulation levels of service and system needs. V-13 Classification tn r-1 cd0 •r-I Ri 0 a wa1 rd b044 Arterial roo A 0 Sa -.4 - iuuunuwawwuwu 0 A t.I0 aU 01 ' u 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 nnnnuunuuuuumuunnu IIIInuliI1111i1nnullnl nlltul 111111111111 IIIgllmnm mrmurwn1munami • U • z (C•L( IN &MIS: InIHI$IIIII HinllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 6•ND N(((NNCN NANAO(N(N9, $11C. toR V-1 4 U TABLE 15 Existing Major Roadway System Inventory Name/ Maintenance R.O.W. FCS Class Segment Description Responsibility (feet) U.S. #1/ Lk. Park N. City 6L Divided FDOT 120 U-MA Limit to Parker Bridge Parker Bridge N. 4L Divided FDOT 120 to PGA Blvd. Northlake SR 81 1 (A-1 -A Alt) 6L Divided FDOT 108 Blvd./U-MA E. to U.S. #1 Prosperity Northlake Blvd N. 5L Undivided County 80 Farms Rd. to Eagle Way Eagle Way N. to 3L Undivided County 80 Burns Road Burns Road N. 5L Undivided County 80 to PGA Blvd. Lighthouse SR 811(A-1-A Alt) 2L Undivided North Palm 80 Dr./C-Coll E. to U.S. #1 Beach According to the Federal Classification System (FCS): U-MA - Urban Minor Arterial U-Coll - Urban Collector Source: Federal Functional Classification System (1993); and LRM, Inc.; 3/96. V-15 Summary Traffic counts are taken at selected locations on the principal street system. Normally, in an effort to identify seasonal variations that may occur and arrive at an average daily traffic volume for a given calendar year, 24-hour counts are taken during the first (peak) quarter and third (off-season) quarter of each year and then averaged. However, since 1984, excluding permanent count stations, FDOT has counted only once per year, using a factoring system to derive annual averages. A total of ten traffic count stations are located either within, or proximate to the Village limits. The location of each is illustrated on MAP 26. One of the two count stations on U.S. Highway No. 1 is outside of the Village limits, as are one each on Northlake Boulevard, Prosperity Farms Road and A-1-A; however, they are the most proximate and used for analysis purposes in this element. Historical traffic volume data for each of these count stations is presented in TABLE 16. Analyses of general levels -of service, comparing AADT volumes in TABLE 16 with adopted LOS standards are presented in TABLE 17. The Village has adopted the following level -of -service (LOS) standards: Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) - D; and Peak Hour - D. A comparison of the above LOS standards to 1995 roadway levels -of -service, per TABLE 17, indicates that there are currently no roadways operating at unacceptable levels of service in the Village. As a result, no improvements are necessary to correct existing deficiencies. Projected traffic volumes for each of the count stations is presented in TABLE 18. Analyses of general levels -of service, comparing AADT volumes in TABLE 18 with adopted LOS standards are presented in TABLE 19. A comparison of the above LOS standards to projected roadway levels -of -service, per TABLE 19, indicates that there will be no roadways operating at unacceptable levels of service in the Village by the year 2005. As a result, no improvements will be necessary to correct projected deficiencies. V-1 6 E-i z a 0 0 TRAFFIC I N V-1 7 Organization; tn ro r-1 a Metropolitan 4-J • . • Lo • cn O -, U M U CO U W III H al Z as G. U O co TABLE. 16 Traffic Count Data Count Stations Within And Proximate To North Palm Beach Roadway A-1 -A Station Traffic Volumes Inventory (AADT**) Number* 1985 1990 1995 2809-2 8,825 8,740 11,479 2816-2 5,733 11,258 9,144 Northlake Blvd. 2815-2 281 7-2 281 9-2 Prosperity Farms Road 35,769 38,438 35,904 30,481 32,038 29,272 22,095 22,908 23,455 2804-2 1 2, 51 5 1 5, 626 1 9,1 92 2806-2 1 4, 336 1 4, 31 2 1 6, 701 2836-2 NA NA 15,921 U.S. Highway 1 2832-2 NA 31,874 28,538 2838-2 NA NA 21 ,1 52 Footnotes: * - Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization designation. ** - AADT - Average Annual Daily Traffic. Source: Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization; LRM, Inc. 3/96. TABLE 17 1995 Roadway Levels -Of -Service Roadway A-1 -A Northlake Blvd. Prosperity Farms Road U.S. Highway 1 E. Lighthouse Drive W. Lighthouse Drive Count 1995 Traffic Level Of Station Count (AADT) Service* 2809-2 11,479 A 2816-2 9,144 A 2815-2 35,904 C 2817-2 29,272 B 2819-2 23,455 B 2804-2 1 9,1 92 A 2806-2 16,701 A 2836-2 1 5, 921 B 2832-2 28,538 C 2838-2 21 ,1 52 B NA NA NA NA * - Comparison of roadway characteristics (number of lanes and divided/undivided) and 1995 AADT volumes with adopted generalized daily level of service maximum volumes, per TABLE 4-1 of the Traffic Circulation Element of the Village Of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan, as amended by Amendment 92-2 (Ref: E.A.R., Section IV, Page IV-24). Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/96; 8/96. TABLE 18 Projected Traffic Counts: 1995-2005 (1) Count Stations Within And Proximate To North Palm Beach Roadway A-1 -A Station Traffic Volume Projections (AADT)(3) Number(2) 1995 2000 2005 2809-2 11,479 13,206 15,037 2816-2 9,144 11,864 1 4, 586 Northlake Blvd. 2815-2 281 7-2 2819-2 35,904 35,975 36,048 29,272 29,857 30,443 23,455 24,182 24,909 Prosperity 2804-2 19,192 25,760 30,855 Farms Road 2806-2 1 6, 701 1 8, 335 1 9, 733 2836-2 1 5, 921 1 7, 338 1 9, 052 U.S. Highway 1 2832-2(4) 28,538 29,108 29,680 2838-2(4) 21 ,1 52 21,575 21,998 Lighthouse East NA NA 12,133 Drive (5) West NA NA 6,885 Footnotes: (1) - Assumes maintenance of historical (1 985-1 995 ) background AADT growth rates. Also includes traffic to be distributed on Prosperity Farms Road and Lighthouse Drive by the buildout of projects in Planning Area 6A. (2)- Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization designation. (3)- AADT - Average Annual Daily Traffic. (4)- Assumes 4% growth during the 1995-2005 period. (5)- East and West of Prosperity Farms Road. Projections based upon buildout of projects in Planning Area 6A, per support documentaion for 92-1 Future Land Use Plan Amendments. Source: LRM, Inc. 3/96. V-20 Roadway TABLE 19 Projected Roadway Levels -Of -Service: 1995-2005 Level -Of -ServiceProj ections (1 ) Station 1995 2000 2005 A-1-A 2809-2 A A C 2816-2 A A B Northlake Blvd. 2815-2 C C C 2817-2 B B B 2819-2 B B B Prosperity Farms Road 2804-2 A B C 2806-2 A A A 2836-2 B C D U.S. Highway 1 2832-2 C C C 2838-2(1) B B B E. Lighthouse Drive(2) NA NA D W. Lighthouse Drive(2) NA NA C FOOTNOTES: (1)- Comparison of roadway characteristics (number of lanes and divided/undivided) and projected AADT volumes, per TABLE 18, with adopted generalized daily level of service maximum volumes, per TABLE 4-1 of the Traffic Circulation Element of the Village Of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan, as amended by Amendment 92-2. (2) Projections per support documentation for Amendment 92- 1, assuming buildout of projects in Planning Area 6A. Source: LRM, Inc.; 3/96. C. HOUSING ELEMENT (1) Housing Data Housing data consists of two basic sources: (1) 1990 Census data; and (2) field inventories and surveys conducted LRM, Inc. Requirement (a) Inventory of the number of housing units. (b) A comparison to housing characteristics in the county. (c) The inventory of standard and substandard housing conditions. (d) The inventory of renter -occupied housing developments. (e) The inventory of group homes. (f) The inventory of mobile homes. (g) The inventory of historically significant housing. (h) The inventory of recent housing construction -activity. Summary The 1990 Census established the housing stock of the Village at 6,781 units. Adding building permit activity (9 single-family units) during the 1989 - 1994 period, results in a current (4/1/95) housing stock estimate of 6,790 units, according to the following distribution: 2,296 single-family detached units; 134 single-family attached units and 4,297 multiple -family units. In 1980, the Census reported a total of 5,741 housing units. Current numbers reflect a 0.07% increase in housing units during the 1990-1995 period. 1990 Census data and field surveys (structural condition) were used as the basis for describing the Village's housing characteristics. Several housing and household characteristics are described, including: Housing units by age of structure; housing tenure characteristics; monthly gross rent of renter occupied units; value of owner -occupied housing; and monthly costs of owner -occupied housing. Comparisons of the above characteristics with those of Palm Beach County are presented in TABLES 20 and 21. From TABLES 20 and 21, it is concluded that vacancy rates were quite low in the Village, as follows: Units vacant for rent -72 units (5.5% vacancy rate); and units vacant for sale - 143 units (3.2% vacancy rate). The aggregate vacancy rate for year-round dwelling units was 3.7% S215 dwelling units). The low vacancy rate is indicative of the demand for additional housing in North Palm Beach, both for rented and owned units. V-22 TABLE 20 1990 Comparative Housing Characteristics North Palm Palm Beach Beach County Total Housing Units 6,781 461,665 Occupied Units 5,561 365,558 Renter -Occupied 1,247 102,664 Owner -Occupied 4,314 262,894 Vacant Units 1,220 96,107 For Rent 72 15,100 For Sale 143 10,037 Seasonal, Occasional or Recreational Use, Other 1,005 70,970 Year Structure Built (units) 1989-March, 1990 20 15,982 1 985-1 988 137 80,453 1980-1984 851 95,717 1 970-1 979 2,492 145,234 1 960-1 969 2,268 63,110 1 950-1 959 926 38,503 1 940-1 949 51 11,258 1939 and before 36 11,408 Units Per Structure (units) One, detached 2,287 181,488 One, attached 134 46,739 Two-four 247 18,116 Five -nine 327 36,920 Ten or more 3,723 118,725 Mobile home, trailer, other 63 26,701 Bedrooms Per Unit (units) None 34 7,091 One 1,000 66,674 Two 3,050 220,011 Three 1,992 130,668 Four 622 32,001 Five or more 83 5,220 Selected Characteristics (units) Lacking Complete Plumbing 0 1,813 Lacking Complete Kitchen 0 2,574 1.0 persons and more per room 8 15,213 Source: 1990 Census. V-23 TABLE 21 1990 Comparative Housing Cost Characteristics North Palm Palm Beach Beach County Housing Value (Specified owned units) Less than $50,000 6 8,953 $50,000-$99,999 618 76,591 $100,000-$149,999 598 35,773 $150,000-$199,999 311 18,108 $200,000-$299,999 274 13,216 $300,000 and more 239 12,901 Median Value $128,200 $98,100 Monthly Owner Costs (Specified units) Mortgaged Units Less than $300 $300-$499 $500-$599 $600-$799 $800-$999 $1 , 000-$1 , 499 $1,500 and more Median per month Units without a mortgage 45 2,941 220 12,497 101 9,342 246 24,758 294 22,829 376 26,443 286 17,774 $894 $869 Less than $100 0 2,402 $1 00-$1 99 1 1 8 15,132 $200-$299 199 14,844 $300-$399 81 6,592 $400 and more 168 9,988 Median $282 $241 Gross Rent (Specified rented units) Less than $200 per month 12 3,504 $200-$299 per month 0 4,709 $300-$499 per month 162 22,870 $500-$749 per month 602 45,386 $750-$999 per month 196 14,093 $1 , 000 and more per month 213 7,825 No cash rent 62 3,898 Median per month $648 $587 Source: 1990 Census V-24 TABLE 22 1990 Comparative Cost Burden Characteristics Gross Rent As A Percentage Of Household Income (Specified units) Less than 20% 20%-24% 25%-29% 30%-34% 35% and more not computed North Palm Palm Beach Beach County 1,382 387 184 1 88 271 81 Selected Monthly Owner Costs As A Percent Of Household Income (Specified units) Less than 20% 20%-24% 25%-29% 30%-34% 35% and more not computed Source: 1990 Census 342 149 186 126 379 62 43,871 20,511 14,947 10,178 26,436 641 38,986 2,809 1 ,841 1 ,000 3,602 720 TABLE 23 1 990-1 995 Comparative 1990 Single-family units Value of single-family units Multiple -family units Value of multiple -family units 1 991 Single-family units Value of single-family units Multiple -family units Value of multiple -family units Building Permit North Palm Beach 2 306,220 0 0 0 0 0 0 1992 Single-family units 4 Value of single-family units $ 1,710,000 Multiple -family units 0 Value of multiple -family units $ 1993 Single-family units Value of single-family units Multiple -family units Value of multiple -family units $ 1994 Single-family units Value of single-family Activity Palm Beach County 4,767 $ 569,782,119 4,150 $ 218,286,797 4,393 $ 500,962,844 2,918 $ 120,409,799 5,533 $ 619,130,099 2,782 0 $ 169,343,737 0 0 0 0 2 units $ 528,000 Multiple -family units 0 Value of multiple -family units $ 0 1995 Single-family units Value of single-family units 21 $ 3,776,312 Multiple -family units 18 Value of multiple -family units $14,698,000 Total 1990-1995 Single-family units 29 Value of single-family units $ 6,320,532 Multiple -family units 18 Value of multiple -family units $14,698,000 Source: Palm Beach County Planning Division V-26 6,184 724,957,311 2,293 $ 191,935,891 7,810 $1 , 027,1 87, 873 3,801 $ 223, 226,1 35 7,810 $1 , 027,1 87, 873 3,801 $ 223,226,135 26,687 $3,442,020,246 15,944 $ 923,202,359 A summary of 1990 Census data, indicated the following age of structure distribution: Number Of Percent Of Year Built Units Total 1989-3/90 20 0.3 1985-1988 137 2.0 1980-1984 851 12.6 1 970-1 979 2,492 36.7 1960-1969 2,268 33.4 1950-1959 926 13.7 1949 & before 87 1.3 TOTALS 6,781 100.0 From the above table, it is concluded that a minor portion (1,013 units, or 15.0%) of the total year-round units were built prior to 1960. From TABLE 20, according to the 1990 Census, there were no housing units in the Village lacking complete plumbing, nor were there any lacking complete kitchen facilities. Further, there were only 8 households having a rate of 1.0 persons per room or more. The value of selected owner -occupied housing is summarized in TABLE 21, using 1990 Census data. A further summary of these data is presented in the following table: 1990 Value Of Selected Owner -Occupied Units Value Range Number Of Units Percent Less than $50,000 6 0.3 $50,000-$99,999 618 30.2 $1 00, 000-$1 49, 999 598 29.2 $1 50, 000-$1 99, 999 311 15.2 $200,000-$299,999 274 13.4 $300,000 and more 239 11.7 TOTAL 2,046 100.0 Median Value $128,200 A windshield survey evaluating external housing conditions of the Village's housing stock was conducted, along with a review of housing and building code violations. Based upon the results of the survey and file review, it is concluded that external housing ponditions do not raise any issues regarding substandard housing and living conditions in the Village. Licensed rental apartments are listed in TABLE 24. There are currently 22 licensed rental apartment complexes, with a total V-27 TABLE 24 Inventory Of Licensed Rental Apartment Complexes Name Villager Apts. Pfeiffer Apts. Portside Apts. Windswept Apt Village Apts. Riverside Apts. Hummingbird Apts. Arista Court Apts. Lighthouse Apts. Remar Apts. Misty Harbor Apts. Paradise Villas Bahia Mar Apts. The Coachman Apts. Villa Eden Apts. Bright Horizons Apts. Southwind Properties Lakeside Apts. Carlton Apts. Riverside Apts. Marina Apts. Hudson Apts. Sabik Apts. Address 215 Castlewood Drive 755 Hummingbird Way 751 Hummingbird Way 745 Hummingbird Way 741 Hummingbird Way 761 Hummingbird Way 801 Hummingbird Way 800 Lighthouse Drive 829 Lighthouse Dr. 420 Northlake Ct. 412 Northlake Ct. 104 Paradise Harbor Blvs. 131 Shore Ct. 308 Southwind Ct. 630 Southwind Ct. 628 Southwind Ct. 312 Southwind Drive 405 Southwind Drive 401 Southwind Drive 330 Southwind Drive 324 Southwind Drive 307 Southwind Drive 124 Yacht Club Drive Total Units (22 complexes) Source: Total Units 16 8 7 6 24 10 10 8 52 12 6 140 15 8 16 12 20 12 8 8 34 6 10 448 Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants: Master Listing of Accounts. Address TABLE 25 Inventory Of Group Homes Type Faith Lutheran Preschool Lighthouse Baptist C.C. Hatton Family Day Janocha Family Day Knapp Family Day Childcare Center Childcare Center Family Day Care Family Day Care Family Day Care Capacity Source: Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. V-28 128 82 5 5 5 of 448 units in the Village. Sanctuary Cove I (184 units) is currently under construction in Planning Area 6A. Further, the proposed Sanctuary Cove II (232 units; formerly Sanctuary. Bay, located in Planning Area 6A) is currently under review by the Village. There are currently no renter -occupied housing developments in the Village using Federal, State or local subsidy programs.:• According to the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS), there are five licensed group home facilities (Ref: TABLE 25) in the Village; two Childcare Centers and three Family Day Care facilities. The Family Day Care facilities are single-family homes and have a licensed capacity of five children each. The two Childcare Centers, Faith Lutheran Preschool (capacity - 128) and Lighthouse Baptist Church (capacity - 82) are located in Planning Areas 4B and 6B, respectively. North Palm Beach has no historically significant housing listed on the Florida Master Site File, the National Register of Historic Places, nor has any been identified by local action. The White Sails Trailer Court is the only mobile home park within the Village. The facility has a capacity of 51 spaces. The park was annexed in 1988 and was assigned a commercial land use designation. The Village currently permits mobile home parks within the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. Based upon a review of building permit activity, housing stock has increased by 9 units (1990 - 1995) since the 1990 Census. There have been no losses due to demolitions, fire and other occurrences. (2) Housing Analysis Requirement (a) Projected number of households. (b) The housing needs of the anticipated populations. (c) The land requirements for the total estimated housing need. (d) The portion of the housing needs projected to be met by the private sector. (e) The private sector housing delivery process and the problems it faces. (f) How the community will provide housing with infrastructure, eliminate substandard housing conditions, provide sites for low and moderate income housing, mobile homes, group homes and foster care facilities, and the identification of conservation, rehabilitation and demolition activities, and V-29 historically significant housing or neighborhoods. Summary Demand for new housing in North Palm Beach consists of additional units required to accommodate projected resident household and seasonal resident growth, as well as a reasonable vacancy rate. Population projections for the 1995 - 2005 period are contained within the Future Land Use Element. It is projected therein that resident population will increase by 989 residents (529 households) during the 1995-2000 period, at which time buildout is projected to occur. Further, it is projected that maximum -day seasonal population will increase by 158 residents (84 units) during the 1995-2000 period, to buildout. Housing needs projections, accounting for resident household and seasonal resident growth and a reasonable vacancy rate, during the 1995 2000 period, are summarized, by density category, in the following table: Density Projected Number Of Units Category 1995 2000 2005 Low 2,296 2,519 2,519 Medium 381 613 613 High 4,113 4,303 4,303 TOTAL 6,790 7,435 7,435 From the above table, it is projected that an additional 645 units will be required during the 1995-2000 period (i.e. projected buildout) to accommodate the Village's housing needs. Residential acreage needs to accommodate housing needs projections for the 1995 - 2000 period, are summarized in TABLE 14 (FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT). From TABLE 14, it is projected that an additional 145.89 acres will be required during the 1995-2000 period to accommodate the Village's housing needs. Resident household projections, by tenure, are presented in the following table: Growth Household Growth Period Rented Units Owned Units 1990-1995 0 9 1995-2000 346* 183 TOTAL 346 192 * - Assumes Sanctuary Cove I and Sanctuary Cove II will both be developed as rental apartment communities. V-30 Historically, housing in North Palm Beach has been supplied entirely by the private sector. High Village household income levels, high housing values and rents, low vacancy rates and good quality and condition of the housing stock, as well as demand for seasonal occupancy, lead to the conclusion that the private sector will continue to meet housing demand throughout the projected buildout period. Four large-scale approved Planned Unit Developments (Prosperity Harbor North, Prosperity Harbor South, Sanctuary Cove I and Sanctuary Cove II) contain 622 units, or 97% of the remaining residential development potential within the Village. Sanctuary Cove I is under construction, while the other 3 projects are projected to be developed by the year 2000. Based upon the above considerations, it is concluded that all projected housing growth in the Village will be at market rates and oriented primarily to moderate and high income groups. It is projected that 416 moderate income rental households will be served by the development of Sanctuary Cove I and II, with most of the balance (206 units) serving primarily high income households. Remaining low income housing opportunities may be provided by the development of the 6 high density units in Planning Area 5. Although projections (based upon approved development concepts) prepared herein do not indicate the ability to provide many low income units, the Village recognizes the need for providing these alternatives on a countywide basis. In this regard, the Village should continue to support the Commission On Affordable Housing, as well as such financing techniques as the Housing Trust Fund, impact fee abatement and density bonus programs. It is concluded that the private sector housing delivery process has the capability to supply projected housing demand through buildout of the Village. Further, the private sector does not face any delivery problems, provided that no unforeseen problems arise in the real estate and/or financial markets. The Village is expected to fulfill the following functions in the delivery process: (1) Author the Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations; and (2) administer the zoning, subdivision, building and housing codes. Due to the current condition of Village housing stock, it is concluded that normal maintenance of residential properties will preclude the need for any replacement activities. Further, due to its removed relationship from agricultural areas (40-60 miles, depending upon the direction) there is no need to provide farmworker housing, nor is there any available land within the Village limits. V-31 Infrastructure services are currently in place to serve projected growth in all areas of the Village. Major system components are in place or programmed to have capacities to accommodate the residential build -out of North Palm Beach. Local extensions of these facilities to accommodate any new development will be the responsibility of the developer. The private sector delivery process has adequately provided housing to accommodate the needs of Village residents at various income levels. It is anticipated that this will be the case through buildout. It is recommended that group homes, mobile homes and elderly housing alternatives continue to be supported by Village land development regulations. The Village has not designated any units as having historical significance, nor have any been placed on State or Federal registers. However, North Palm Beach should periodically consider the need to designate historically significant housing structures as a means of preserving the Village heritage, as well conserving its housing stock. D1. SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) The allocated proportional capacity. The identification of public and private facilities. The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. The existing and projected facility needs. Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary In August of 1988, the Village of North Palm Beach, along with the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the Town of Lake Park, the Town of Juno Beach and Palm Beach County entered into an interiocal agreement establishing the Seacoast Utilities Authority (SUA) for the purpose of purchasing or acquiring Seacoast Utilities, Inc. The objective of SUA is to provide potable water and wastewater service within the service area previously served by Seacoast Utilities, Inc. SUA currently operates one sanitary sewer system within its designated service area; the PGA facility. Previously operated plants (i.e. Anchorage Drive and Cabana Colony) have been phased out; however, the Anchorage Drive plant is on standby basis and can be activated within a 48 hour period. The service area for Seacoast Utilities Authority is illustrated on MAP 27. North Palm Beach is currently served by the PGA Plant, which also serves the balance of the SUA area. Land uses within the SUA service area are primarily residential. Commercial land uses, with the exception of the Gardens Mall (Palm Beach Gardens) are predominantly neighborhood and community -scale retail and office uses. Industrial uses are limited, located primarily in the Town of Lake Park. SUA owns, operates and maintains the sanitary sewer system serving the Village, including lift stations mains or interceptors (i.e. gravity and force mains). With the exception of a few individual lots, the served by central wastewater facilities. collection and trunk Village is The Anchorage Drive treatment and disposal facility currently consists of the following components: V-33 3E►a 32►a U H >4a HW a"' o a xW H• E En N H a aH a Eo DA o a C.)3 2► 4 W 31►a cI BUILDOUT SERVICE AREA r, N 3JIIdNaT11 L I avaa 31e S.vallQ-u 1S a3S0dQdd 11; rill 3 Ir BUILDOUT SERVICE AREA Abv1i1IN S.valani 3 Cr a 3al, a LO rn rn V-34. 3 IP 1 '1 1. Treatment plant - An 8.0 MGD (approved rating capacity) aerobic digestion secondary treatment process. The plant is currently treating an average of 8.01 MGD of raw wastewater. A construction bid has been awarded to expand the treatment plant to a capacity of 12.0 MGD. The expansion should be complete within 18 months. 2. Effluent disposal - Secondary treated effluent is disposed of via a deep well injection system. In addition, a program to dispose of filtered, disinfected wastewater by greenspace irrigation is in place. 3. Sludge disposal - Sludge is currently treated via an aerobic digestion process, thickened and dewatered by belt press, to 125% solids, and trucked to the Dyer Boulevard landfill for final disposal. Dewatering and disposal capacity is available to accommodate the 1997 plant expansion. According to SUA, the expanded treatment facility is projected to have the capacity to provide service to the service area through the year 2002. The table below represents estimated 1995 flows for the SUA service area and North Palm Beach: Estimated 1995 Wastewater Flows (MGD) Wastewater Flow Average Annual Daily Flow Total Max. Month Daily Flow* * - 1.12 x AADF SUA North Palm Total Beach 8.01 8.97 1.31 1 .47 Within the SUA service area, it is estimated that an average of 111 gallons of wastewater per capita (resident) per day (gpcd) during 1995. On this basis, it is concluded that 71,974 people are currently being served on an average annual daily basis. Of this total, approximately 16.5% are residents of the Village. The following table presents AADF and MDF projections for the Village: Year Population AADF MDF 1995 11,844 1.31 1.47 2000 1 2, 833 1.42 1.59 2005 12,833 1.42 1.59 Using a plant capacity of 12.0 MGD and the year 2000 AADF projections, it is concluded that 11.8% of the plant capacity V-35 will be used by land uses in the Village at that time. Based upon projections it is concluded that the expanded plant will have the capacity to accommodate growth within the Village for the ten-year projection period. Further, SUA has the financial and legislative authority to implement necessary improvements during the 1995 - 2000 period. The PGA plant was originally constructed in 1976 as a 3.0 MGD activated sludge plant. Over the years, modifications have resulted in the transformation of the facility to an aerobic digestion process. Major treatment components are the influent pumping station, influent screening and grit removal, aeration with mechanical aerators, secondary clarification, chlorination, aerobic sludge digestion, belt filter press dewatering and deep well injection of effluent. Currently sludge is disposed of at the Dyer Boulevard landfill, following dewatering at the PGA plant. Landfill disposal is costly and alternatives should be pursued. The Water And Wastewater Master Plan Revision of 1995 (Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc.) is in final draft form at this time. Discussions of alternative system improvements are contained therein. A summary of final improvements, as well as costs and secedules should be included in the E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan amendments. There are currently 21 septic tanks in the Village, 18 of which serve single-family homes. Two are located on the North Palm Beach Country Club golf course and one serves the Village Community Center. Due to the limited number, low density of occurrence and drainfield elevations, no pollution problems have been noted by Village officials. If problems become apparent, central wastewater service can be made available. V-36 D2. SOLID WASTE SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary The Palm Beach County Solid Waste'Authority (SWA), a state agency formed by special act of the Florida legislature, was created in 1974 to develop and implement a countywide resource recovery and waste management program. The purpose for which the SWA was formed is to provide a coordinated countywide program for the control of solid waste processing and disposal. The Sanitation Division of the North Palm Beach Public Services Department offers solid waste collection service, using equipment which it owns, operates and maintains, to all single-family and multiple -family residences within the Village. The Village also collects commercial solid waste, with the exceptions of several large restaurants. These facilities contract directly with private haulers to collect both trash and garbage. Private collection is necessary in these instances since the restaurants require the use of larger containers than the Village can presently service. The Village provides "backdoor" pick-up service to single-family residences three times per week. This service does not include special wastes, such as yard clippings, which are picked up twice per week. The Village collects all solid waste from multiple -family complexes. This classification represents one-third of all residential wastes generated. Multiple -family complexes use containers (dumpsters) to collect solid waste, which are then serviced by the Village up to three times per week. The Village also provides additional service for the separate collection of newspapers and aluminum, glass and plastic recyclables once per week. Collected recyclables are transported to the County's resource recovery facility where they are then sold to a local purchaser. V-37 The Village does not provide collection service for construction sites; rather, individual developers are responsible for collecting and disposing of wastes generated on construction sites. The Village hauls solid waste approximately five miles to the Jupiter Transfer Station. The Solid Waste Authority then transports the solid waste to the North County Resource Recovery Facility for disposal. Trips to the Jupiter Transfer Station by packers servicing the Village are made on an "as needed" basis. The North County Resource Recovery Facility received 13,057,062 tons of solid waste and recyclables in 1995. Based upon a solid waste generation of 11,096 tons the Village's share of solid waste disposed at the landfill is 0.8%. The North County Resource Recovery Facility is located on 40 acre, immediately west of the closed Dyer Boulevard landfill. The facility is planned to accommodate the County's disposal needs for the next 20 years. The facility is planned to accommodate a disposal rate of 3,000 tons per day. If the actual rate exceeds this figure in the future, a second facility will be developed in the south County area. The SWA has recently constructed a solid waste transfer station (Jupiter facility), to service the north end of the county, off of Donald Ross Road. The use of this facility has reduced the hauling travel -time for Village trucks. The generation of solid waste is influenced by two factors: (1) The number of people; and (2) the amount and intensity of commercial and industrial activity. The majority of solid waste generated in the Village is from residential areas, while commercial and other areas contribute less significantly. Generation rates, or levels -of -service (LOS), for the various types of generators in the Village are estimated, using current population, land use and solid waste generation figures, are estimated as follows: Single -Family Residential - 0.938 tons/capita/year. Multiple -Family Residential - 0.595 tons/capita/year. Non -Residential - 5.23 tons/acre/year. Solid waste projections, for the 1995 - 2005, based upon the capacity of the regional resource recovery facility, are presented in the following table: V-38 Village Regional Generation Capacity Village Share Year (tons/year) (tons/year) (% of capacity) 1995 11,096 1,095,000 1.01 2000 1 2, 023 1,095,000 1 .1 0 2005 1 2, 023 1,095,000 1 .1 0 The SWA is charged by Special Act to provide solid waste services for the entire County; therefore, allocation of capacity to various local governments will not be done. However, SWA staff conclude that the regional resource recovery facility will accommodate the disposal needs of the County through the year 2021. The Village currently operates 7 packer trucks and 8 jitney vehicles to provide: collection service. According to the Village, these vehicles are adequate to accommodate projected growth during the 1995 - 2005 planning period. However, the Village has an annual program of renewal and replacement consisting of the purchase of one packer truck ($60,000 in current dollars) and two jitneys ($24,000 in current dollars). The annual expenditure program equates to a seven-year rotation of packer trucks and a 5-year rotation of jitney vehicles. The total ($84,000) is an annual expenditure which should be included within the Five -Year Schedule of Improvements. D3. DRAINAGE SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) The identification of major natural drainage features and groundwater recharge areas. (h) The existing regulations which govern land use and development of natural drainage features and groundwater recharge areas. Summary The principal Federal program governing stormwater management is the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N.P.D.E.S.). For years this program focused primarily upon reducing pollutants in the discharges of industrial process wastewater and municipal sewage. However, as pollution measures were developed for these discharges, the focus of the program changed to addressing the more diffuse sources of pollution such as stormwater runoff. Many recent studies have shown that runoff from urban and industrial areas typically contains significant quantities of the same general types of pollutants that are found in wastewaters and industrial discharges. The central provision of the Water Quality Act of 1987 which governs stormwater discharges is Section 405, which added a new subsection "p" to existing Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Section 402(p) of the CWA adopts a phased approach to controlling pollutants in stormwater discharges. It established phased permit application requirements, permit issuance deadlines and permit compliance conditions for different categories of stormwater discharges. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region IV determined, in 1991, that all of the municipal separate storm sewer systems in Palm Beach County should be designated as part of the County's system for the purposes of obtaining an N.P.D.E.S. Permit. As a result, all 37 municipalities, the FDOT, Palm Beach County and five Water Control Districts were required to jointly submit a single permit application. For the purposes of obtaining the permit, the Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District (NPBCWCD) was designated as the Applicant, with the other 43 entities designated as Co -Applicants. All were parties to an interlocal agreement executed to implement the permit requirements. V-40 The Florida Water Resources Act of 1972 (Florida Statutes, Chapter 373) establishes the statewide stormwater management scheme using a combination of State and regional controls. It provides for the development of regulations, permits, enforcement, management plans and purchases and financing of land. The Act focuses on the withdrawal, diversion, storage and consumption of water, as opposed to the use of water for the discharge of wastes which is regulated by Florida Statutes, Chapter 403. Water management (Chapter 373) and pollution control (Chapter 403) are linked together under the Florida Water Plan, as defined in the State Water Policy (Chapter 17-40, Florida Administrative Code). Chapter 17-40 provides that Water Management Districts shall set regional stormwater management goals on a watershed basis, including pollutant load reductions necessary to serve or restore beneficial uses of receiving waters. Such goals shall be implemented through District Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) plans, through the preparation of watershed management plans in other designated priority watersheds and through appropriate regulations. The N.P.D.E.S. permit program will be one of the means of implementing the pollutant load reductions. Chapter 17-40 also requires local governments to establish stormwater management programs which are in accordance with the State and Water Management District stormwater quality and quantity goals. Local governments may establish a stormwater utility or other dedicated source of funding to implement a local stormwater management program which shall include the development and implementation of a stormwater master plan and provisions, such as an operating permit system, to ensure that stormwater systems are properly operated and maintained. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has implemented a stormwater rule (Chapter 17-25, Florida Administrative Code) to fulfill part of the State's responsibilities under Chapter 403. The basic objective is to achieve 80% to 95% removal of pollutants before discharging stormwater to receiving water bodies. The rule requires treatment of the first inch of runoff for sites of less than 100 acres in size and the first one-half inch of runoff for sites larger than 100 acres in size. Implementation of the rule in Palm Beach County has been delegated to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) by FDEP. The SFWMD has instituted exemptions to the rule requirements, including: (1) Residential sites for individual single-family, duplex, triplex or quadroplex units; (2) residential sites of less than 10 acres in size, with less than 2 acres of impervious area; and (3) agricultural or silvacultural lands having an approved management plan. V-41 Palm Beach County is one of 16 counties being served by the SFWMD, the local agency charged with the responsibility to operate and maintain major canals, structures and associated facilities. The surface water hydrology of the SFWMD is characterized by an. extensive, heavily managed canal network, a series of large capacity, low head pumping stations and several surface water impoundment areas that comprise more than 1,000 square miles. The Lower East Coast Canal system of the SFWMD most directly effects the Village. The coastal canal networks of Palm Beach County provide primary drainage for the heavily developed southeastern urban areas. The coastal canals allow transfer of water from the Everglades water conservation areas to coastal communities during times of drought. This water recharges major wellfields and raises groundwater levels to provide additional water to self -supplied potable water systems. Water stages in the eastern reaches of these canals are controlled by a series of water control structures, most of which are automatically operated to open or close in response to the canal water levels. The C-17 Canal discharges to the Earman River, in the Village, which, in turn, discharges to the Intracoastal Waterway; The C-17 Canal Basin has an area of approximately 32 square miles, and is located west of the Village. The C-17 Canal has two functions: (1) To provide flood protection and drainage for the C-17 Basin; and (2) to maintain a ground water table elevation near the lower reach o.f the canal to prevent saltwater intrusion into local ground waters. Excess water in the basin is discharged to the Earman River via the S-44 Salinity Control Structure, which also controls overall water flow within the basin. East of this structure, water in the Canal is tidal influenced and brackish in nature. In general, the only water supply to the basin is local rainfall. Flows into the C-17 Canal are from various canals under the management of local municipalities and the Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District. The entire Village discharges its stormwater into tidal waters, east of the S-44 Salinity Control Structure. There are four main tidal water bodies into which stormwater is discharged: (1) The Earman River; (2) the North Palm Beach Waterway; (3) the Intracoastal Waterway; and (4) the northern portion of Lake Worth. Since stormwater is discharged directly to tidal waters, the Village is included within the Intracoastal Waterway watershed, as defined by the N.P.D.E.S. permit program. The Intracoastal Waterway watershed includes all or a portion of the communities fronting the Intracoastal Waterway in Palm Beach County, located south of Indiantown Road. V-42 The commercial areas of the Village are confined to frontage along U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northlake Boulevard. These roads have curb and gutter systems, with positive outfall pipes to either the Earman River of Lake Worth. The drainage systems are maintained jointly by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the Village. The Village drainage system can be divided into 27 areas, as identified on MAP 28 and described in TABLE 26. The Village drainage system has been built in a piece -meal fashion, with the majority constructed between 1956 and 1970, prior to the implementation of any discharge regulations. The likely design criterion, similar to that used by FDOT, is a minimum three-year storm recurrence interval. Currently, SFWMD uses a five-year, one -day duration event. criterion, which generally equates to a rainfall depth of 6.8 inches. A review of SFWMD daily rainfall data collected at the Jupiter Fire Station (nearest collection point) indicates that, during the 1978 - 1987 period, several storm events approximating the five-year, one -day storm event occurred. During this same period, the Village received few complaints from residents related to excessive flooding. Further, according to the Village, the maximum ponding time within the system has generally not exceeded 45 minutes. Ponding for periods of 2 - 3 hours occasionally occurs in Planning Area 3B (Yacht Club Addition) during periods of heavy rainfall coincident with a high tide condition when outfall pipes are partially submerged (in Lake Worth), thus temporarily reducing system capacity. On the basis of this evaluation, the design capacity and level - of -service is estimated to be at least satisfactory, in the developed portion of the Village, to meet the minimum criterion of a five-year, one -day storm event. However, it is recommended that the Village maintain the interim level -of -service (LOS) standard of a 3-year, one -day design storm until such time that a master drainage study is completed, provided that one is required under the conditions of the N.P.D.E.S. permit program and/or Chapter 17-40, Florida Administrative Code. Few areas of the Village are not currently being served by drainage systems, most of which are located in Planning Area 6A. However, all properties within Planning Area 6A are the subjects of Planned Unit Development (PUD) approvals by the Village. Related stormwater management systems have received or will be required to receive permit approval from Village, Water Management District and Department of Environmental Protection, as appropriate; specifically, to ensure that post -development runoff rates, volumes and pollutant loads do V-43 NORTH MAP 28 PALM BEACH DRAINAGE AREAS • i v"y�yv fC. z 1 �% al a: Jr ''� fff reemilummi �.� • 1 �,� Sic,:j j. .y .71 ....... .... ... ....... .......................... i al II• •I PJi MWMMWin a 1 • V-44 0 fti 9-4 0 Palm Beach 4-1 0 a) a) cn O TABLE 26 In al 0 0 to w 4J*.w 0 al y 4.1 .n t0 •.•4 o a m Jef b • Al A a >. v) • al 1n .4.1 al >, a eft tin 4.1 a N G 43 •.1 p1 a a u 1.4 IV G •.4 al fn fa •• 1.4 yc 1.1 > 0 1.1 • .0 44 4.1 1•> 1. 01 11 4 >a 'V U 0 1 W a U>, 0.Z 14 O y b - • 1.1 al O 0 0 > a•.1 nl C CO 'cz 'va c 0 •-+ ••a ar OZ Private Drainage On -site Drainage and Retention X is X )c X X X X X >c >C )c )c x x X X X >c se x is ?C X x X is 7K X N m m CO CO IO N N el ri IA IA IA r' IA tel 1f1 CO 01,'.n 441. Y1 IA f. CO O CO NIA 1n In an • my If1 e 44-1 4-1 N v ir N1 1 1 1 N .-1 .-1 .-1 N .-1 4.4 .-1 .-1 .-1 .-{ N .••1 4.1 N .-1 el 4.4 1 .-i ...-I .•1 N N .•i .-1 m /n m N .d 0-1 .-1 m CO 'WOO WW1.. v,-11nifs UI.119 WIininco 1A1A tu1Inr-mom 41PinntftLft a• 44-1 .-4 N Q' a f'•1 N N m N .-i .-1 4-1 N .-1 v.4 ..4.-1 4.4 .-1 N 4.4 .-1 N 4.1 el .-1 N .-1 .-1 .-i .•1 t 4 f V .•1 • • .-1 .-1 N 0 4 1 44.1 fro N1 . IA 4-4 N m IA IO r m .••1 N In .•1 N el q41. If1 .. N •" 1 Q U1 10 r o N O 0% o, O► N 4 .1 Z Z O 4 .-4NNNNf",1 u CD CO N O 0 IA LA '.0 440 0 01 471 01 01 a .-1 .-1 .-1 .. 2 a a tx «. ti W 0 CO 0 •t rn fit V-45 4 4 a 0 U w 19 41 >. • C 0% C C i+ Z 10 cr•.•U O w3o C G U uFel �u ••+ CC r~ 4A of IC .0 w N U W i� ••i C • ✓ C C/I .0 0 b w 4.'1. 7 0 aa� 113 ..-1 as xxxxxxxxxxx 41 4.1 14 C 4.4 Ow C 41 41 tT 4.1 1.1 V 41 W 41 a.004 uo 4) 44 - -•i O > 14 4) t O •C 0 ' 40 C U O r. 41 Io U C a 4 WI) L 1 • O w+J 4) 41 :J U 10 41 > Na Ad US x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ooNo r 1•1 0 AD to in RI 1•1 a1' 1•1 .-1 N Co m CO art 111 CV .-i UN CO N P1 CO CO s0 r•1 ao .-1 e•1 42' .-1 .4 1 1 1 1 N 1 r1 .'I .•I . 1,1 .i .-i N .1 .-1 .-1 1 rl .-'1 r♦ 1 .-1 N 1 N In In 111 v WI mir Co 111. .4 .-1 .4 N .-1 N .4 N 1r11n00No.4rCO000O .41 .i r•1 1•1 1•1 N CH' .-1 .4 .-1 ri N f•t a- &41 1441 .'-1 N .441 .441 N N 1n N .4 in ad N 1•1 Co Co NO 0 Co .-1 N .f 4441 .-1 .1 N .4.1 .-1 .-i 1•1 .-1 .-i .41 RI .-1 N Q N 441 N 1.1'q' N NO 1` .-41 1V 4.41 N m V' 41 oO m ao co co CL ▪ • CO �r1 111 u'l In In a 14 to an ON a-. a► aC 441 an 4-1 .i .-1 .-1 .-1 u) U 4-1 CC1 U Co W 4.i x C•• at CD 1l1 U) 1f1 111 IA %O x 0 0 00 41 413 4.0 1.0 an C 41 an 0 0) C1r .4 .a r♦ < i t9 > n r N r . • •. O r- •r4 1 -4-J ro .a..1 O O E .Q CJ cc) 0 E-1 A 0 N O not exceed pre -development conditions. The Village is projected to attain a built -out situation during the 1995 - 2000 period, creating a relatively stable condition in terms of stormwater management. Future emphasis should be placed on maintenance and repair or replacement, on an as needed basis and/or pollutant load reductions, provided they are required by either the N.P.D.E.S. permit conditions and/or programs under Chapter 17-40, Florida Administrative Code. The Village drainage system has an indefinite life expectancy and will be repaired on an as -needed basis. Further, preventative maintenance needs to be performed to maintain system effectiveness. The routine drainage inspection schedule should be retained to adequately plan and budget future repairs or improvements. Since the Village is currently 96% developed, it is assumed that future development will have a minor additional impacts upon surrounding natural resources, provided proper planning and development regulations are implemented. The major natural drainage features in the Village are the water bodies that border and run through the incorporated area. The highest elevations occur in the interior of the Village and range from 12.58 NGVD to 29.58 NGVD, then generally slope toward the water bodies. All other drainage features are due to the design and construction of the current system. The Village has instituted and implemented several Beat Management Practices for new development and significant redevelopment, including: (1) Grass swales (Section 36 -28d; Subdivision Regulations); (2) vegetative cover (Section 36-31f; Subdivision Regulations); (3) diversion/retention (Section 31-36f; Subdivision Regulations); (4) erosion control (Section 31-36f; Subdivision Regulations); (5) onsite retention (Section 31-36f; Subdivision Regulations); (6) pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers handling licenses and practices; (7) prohibition of illicit discharges (Ordinance 8-93; Stormwater Management Ordinance); (8) field screening and cleaning of catch basins; (9) spill response and prevention by the Village Fire Department; (10) limitations on septic tank installation within the Urban Service Area; and (11) construction site BMPs, per the "208" Plan are required. The Draft N.P.D.E.S. permit has not been finalized as of this time; however, it is possible that it will be completed in 1997. Upon finalization, conditions and requirements should be incorporated within the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. V-47 D4. POTABLE WATER SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary There has been no centralized, countywide potable water systems planning effort in Palm Beach County. As a result system planning has been accomplished by individual operators (i.e. County or municipal governments and privately -owned facilities). In August of 1988, the Village of North Palm Beach, along with the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the Town of' Lake Park,'the Town of Juno Beach and Palm Beach County entered into an interiocal agreement establishing the Seacoast Utilities Authority (SUA) for the purpose of purchasing or acquiring Seacoast Utilities, Inc. The objective of SUA is to provide potable water and wastewater service within the service area previously served by Seacoast Utilities, Inc. SUA purchased Seacoast Utilities in December, 1988. SUA currently operates two interconnected potable water systems within its designated service area: (1) Hood Road; and (2) Richard Road. The general SUA service area is. illustrated on MAP 27, while the locations of wellfields, treatment plants and raw water mains are illustrated on MAP 29. Since each of the individual systems is looped and interconnected, the SUA potable water facilities are regarded as a single system for the purposes of this analysis. The Hood Road and Richard Road facilities they are linked by a series of interconnections and distribution line loops. In this manner, SUA has the ability to channel potable water to any point within its service area, depending upon need. Land uses within the SUA service area are primarily residential. Commercial land uses, with the exception of the Gardens Mall (Palm Beach Gardens) are predominantly neighborhood and community -scale retail and office uses. Industrial uses are limited, located primarily in the Town of Lake Park. V-48 .cW.,ia.ar.n+pa+.r� 3N1dN gf11 S.VOlHO1d POTABLE WATER 5WliV� AL1113dS021d 7 12 � S6—I 1IV211 AMV111111 8 • ,n 01 0, r� N 0 V-49 Existing raw water is supplied by four wellfields; two wellfields (Hood Road and Palm Beach Gardens) serve the Hood Road plant and two wellfields (Richard Road and Burma Road) serve the Richard Road plant. There are a total of 34 wells at the four wellfields. Current wellfield information regarding the Richard Road plant is presented in the following table: Number of Wells Permitted Withdrawal Average Day Maximum Day Total SUA System* 34 19.8 MGD 26.7 MGD * - Hood Road, Palm Beach Gardens, Richard Road and Burma Road. The average depth of the wells is approximately 100 feet. Permitted capacity (by the South Florida Water Management District) for the entire SUA system is expressed both on an average day and a maximum day basis. Total permitted average day withdrawal is 19.8 MGD, while maximum day withdrawal, based upon the application of a 1.35 use factor, is 26.7 MGD. Each of the wellfields is located outside of the Village limits; however, the Zone 4 Contour (least restrictive) of the Richard Road wellfield extends into the southern part of the Village in Planning Areas 5, 6B and 7. Defined Restrictive Contour Zones (Zones 1-3) do not encroach upon North Palm Beach. The following table illustrates the relationship between design capacities of the treatment plants and actual SUA systemwide potable water treatment activities (i.e. 1995 flows): Plant Capacity Average Day Flow Maximum Day Flow Richard Road Hood Road SUA Total 7.5 MGD 23.0 MGD 30.5 MGD 14.1 MGD 19.4 MGD Seven facilities, with a combined capacity of 9.43 MGD, provide potable water storage for the SUA potable water system, as follows: Richard Road Lilac Street Hood Road Type Elevated Storage none none 0.3 MGD Ground Level Storage 2.13 MGD 1.00 MGD 4.0 MGD 1.00 MGD 1.0 MGD Total 2.13 MGD 2.12 MGD 5.3 MGD V-50 In addition, a remote elevated storage tank (0.3 MGD) is located at the inactive Anchorage Drive wastewater plant. Using the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) preferred standard (storage capacity should equal 0.5 x average daily flow) capacity of SUA storage facilities is adequate to accommodate current flows. The following water demand characteristics are important for assessing the capacity of water treatment, pumping and transmission facilities to serve customers, according to industry standards: Annual Average Daily Flow (AADF) - Total system water flow for the year divided by 365 days. AADF is useful for estimating annual operation and maintenance costs and revenues from water sales. Maximum Daily Flow (MDF) - The highest water flow during a single 24-hour period during any given year. MDF is used for sizing water supply facilities such as wellfields, raw water mains and treatment facilities. Finished or treated water transmission and distribution lines are sized to meet.MDF plus flows required for fighting fires. Peak Hour Flows (PHF) - The highest water flow during any one -hour period. PHF is used for sizing water storage and pumping facilities. Typically, demands exceeding MDF are met by water available in storage facilities. PHF is also used in sizing finished water transmission mains. The following table presents 1995 water flows for North Palm Beach and the SUA system: Estimated 1995 Waste Flows (MGD) North Palm Total SUA Customer Group Beach Area Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) 2.26 14.37 Total Max. Month Daily Flow (MDF) 3.05 19.40 Total Peak Hour Flow (PHF) 5.94 37.79 Within the SUA service area, AADF is calculated by assuming 191 gpcd. MDF and PHF are derived by applying factors (1.35 for MDF and 2.63 for PHF) to the AADF. Factors were supplied by SUA staff. For planning purposes, the following level -of -service (LOS) standards should be used: AADF MDF 191 gpcd 258 gpcd V-51 Five-year and ten-year projections of Village potable water demands are presented in the following table: Average Daily Maximum Daily Year Population Flow (MGD) Flow (MGD) 1995 11,844 2.26 3.05 2000 12,833 2.45 3.31 2005 12,833 2.45 3.31 Based upon the above projections, it is concluded that the SUA facilities have the current capacity to accommodate projected growth within the Village for both the five-year and ten-year projection periods. Combined plant capacity at both SUA facilities is 30.5 MGD. Utilizing MDF figures for the year 2000, 10.8% of the plant capacity should be reserved for the Village. The water transmission and distribution is considered to be in good condition with improvements made subsequent to the purchase of the system by SUA. Recent modeling of the Village distribution system by SUA indicates that adequate fire flows are maintained in North Palm Beach. There are currently 17 individual wells in the Village, all of which serve single-family homes. Four are located in Planning Area 6A, while 13 are located in Planning Area 7. Assuming that consumptive rates are similar to other areas in the Village, it is estimated that current water use does not exceed the following rates: AADF - 6,685 gallons; and MDF - 9,025 gallons. On this basis, it is concluded that there is minimal impact upon the water supply caused by individual wells in North Palm Beach. It is not anticipated that any additional development will be served by individual wells. D5. NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB -ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (c) The allocated proportional capacity. (d) The identification of public and private facilities. (e) The operating entity, geographic service area, design capacity, current demand, existing level -of -service. (f) The existing and projected facility needs. (g) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). (h) Not applicable (refers to Drainage Sub -Element). Summary Geologic formations can be divided hydrogeologically into aquifers (units which produce water), and confining zones (units which separate aquifers and retard the movement of water from one aquifer to another). The hydrogeologic units underlying Palm Beach County are the Surficial Aquifer System (commonly known as the Shallow Aquifer), the Intermediate Aquifer System and the Floridan Aquifer System. The Surficial Aquifer System provides nearly all of the ground water used in Palm Beach County. It covers the entire County and ranges from approximately 150 feet to 300 feet in thickness. Water levels in the Surficial Aquifer System range from a high of 22 feet NGVD in the north -central part of the County to close to sea level at the coast. Water levels in the system are largely controlled by the canal network extending from Lake Okeechobee. Recharge to the system is through infiltration from rainfall, canals, the Water Conservation Areas and Lake Okeechobee. Saltwater normally moves inland through the lower part of the Surficial Aquifer System, which is in contact with Lake Worth. As the saltwater moves inland, it decreases in salinity. This allows it to rise to the base of the fresh water portion of the aquifer. The diffused saltwater then tends to follow natural hydraulic gradients back toward the Atlantic Ocean. The barrier island (Planning Area 1), separating the Atlantic Ocean from Lake Worth, is subject to saltwater intrusion from two directions. Some degree of saltwater intrusion into the Surficial Aquifer System also occurs along the various waterways and bodies within the Village. The prime cause of saltwater intrusion in Palm Beach County is municipal water pumping. This can locally reduce the seaward V-53 hydraulic gradient and result in allowing saltwater seepage into the aquifer. Although saltwater intrusion is presently a problem at several wellfields in Palm Beach County, the Village has no significant problem at this time. The municipal water supply for the Village is drawn from points west of the Village, thus reducing the effect of the seaward gradient in the area. However, if pumping is allowed to increase without restriction, wellfield cones of depression could adversely effect the seaward gradient. The generally accepted solution to saltwater intrusion, as well as other water supply problems, is wellfield management on a regional scale. At the present time, however, there is insufficient information available to allow the County or Village to institute a comprehensive aquifer recharge area protection program. This problem should be resolved with the completion of the Ground Water Basin Resource Availability Inventory (GWBRAI) for Palm Beach County by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Until the GWBRAI is available, the County,has adopted interim measures (Wellfield Protection Ordinance) to promote protection of aquifer recharge functions. The Ordinance is based upon known characteristics of development in the County and general knowledge of aquifer recharge principles. The Village is projected to be built -out by 2000. Thus the only potential effects will be from the limited reduction of vacant land area remaining within the Village as it relates to the recharge of the immediate groundwater aquifer. Palm Beach County has recently adopted a Wellfield Protection. Ordinance to regulate the handling storage and production of hazardous and toxic materials within certain zones of influence of major potable water wellfields throughout the County. Major wellfields are defined as those which produce, or are planned to produce at least 100,000 gallons per day of potable water. A wellfield is subject to the Ordinance only when zones of influence maps have been developed. A series of maps have been developed for the Richard Road wellfield; the most proximate SUA wellfield to the Village limits. There are four regulation zones (zones of influence) developed around each wellfield: Zone 1 is in the land area situated between the well and the 30-day travel -time -contour line; Zone 2 is in the land area between the 30-day and 210-day travel - time -contour line; Zone 3 is the land located between the 210-day travel -time -contour and the 500-day travel -time -contour; and Zone 4 is the land located beyond the 500-day travel -time -contour and within the one -foot drawdown contour V-54 line. In general, Zone 1 is a prohibition zone, while Zones 2, 3 and 4 are permitting zones. The Zone Of Influence Map for the Richard Road wellfield is presented on MAP 30.. The outer limit of Zone 4, the least restrictive, encroaches upon the Village limits in two general locations: (1) The portion of the Village defined by Prosperity Farms Road on the west and Lighthouse Drive on the North; and (2) the portion of the Village defined by the Earman River on the north and Prosperity Farms Road on the west. All non-residential activities within Zone 4 which store, handle, use or produce any "Regulated Substance" are prohibited, unless they qualify as a general exemption or receive an operating permit from the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Regulated substances are defined in Section 9.3.B.26. of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code. The Village limits are, therefore, outside of the most restrictive wellfield protection zones. Wellfield maps, however, are reviewed annually for possible adjustment due to‘changing circumstances such as increased pumping. As a result, the Village should review maps, as they are revised, to determine if any additional regulatory action is required. Department of Environmental Resources C7,01s I I 1 1 tnuurn aaww O 0 0 0 O 000 w awa CA CI) to to rtrtrrrt 1 1 1 1 a�xrx G �• w 0 � i 0 O wwc0 O • art w a zri a a 0 CD A) w art arlaId'.NM N CA E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT (2) Data and Analysis Requirement (a) The inventory and map of existing land uses in the coastal area; the analysis of conflicts among shoreline uses; the economic base analysis; the estimate of the need for water -dependent and water -related development sites. (b) The effect of future land uses on natural.resources. (c) The impacts of development on historic resources. (d) The inventory and analysis of estuarine pollution from existing and proposed development and corrective actions. (e) Natural disaster planning concerns. (f) The inventory of beach and dune systems and assessment of future needs. (g) The inventory of public access facilities and assessment of future needs. (h) The inventory of existing infrastructure and an assessment of future needs. Summary For the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the coastal area is defined as illustrated on MAP 31. The map has been updated to account for areas annexed during the 1989-1996 period. The Village is predominantly a recreation and water -oriented residential community. Four major waterways (Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW), North Palm Beach Waterway (NPBWW), Earman River (C-17 Canal) and Lake Worth), as well as three small water bodies (North Lake, West Lake and Lake Worth Cove) provide waterfront for residential and water- related land uses, including marinas, beaches, fishing areas and parks. The coastal area of the Village includes the defined water bodies, as well as the upland areas adjacent thereto. With the exception of the Earman River, all water bodies within the coastal area are characterized as typical tidally -influenced estuarine waters. Village marinas are located on MAP 32 and characterized in TABLE 27. The 6 marinas in the Village, the Atlantic Ocean Beaches, nature trails of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and the many fishing areas along the shorelines of the various waterways and water bodies constitute water -dependent and water -related land uses in the Village. Lakeside Park, although located along the Lake Worth shoreline, is a passive recreation facility and does not provide any significant water -related use. V-57 N 0 V-58 0 • • 0 (d CD cli s4E z to .r► O W U S4 z O V-59 Marina Lotts Brothers (North Lake) Bassett Boat Co. (Earman River) North Palm Bch. Marina (ICWW) Old Port Cove Marina (Lk. Worth) Anchorage Park Marina (NPBWW) TABLE 27 MARINAS AND BOATING FACILITIES Capacity 19 wet slips 111 indoor storage spaces 110 wet slips 300 wet slips . 33 wet slips 185 dry storage spaces Services fuel pump facili- ties, bait and tackle fuel pump facili- ties fuel pump facili- ties fuel pump facili- ties boat ramp Ownership privately -owned •public facility privately -owned public facililty privately -owned public facility privately -owned public facility publicly -owned residents only SOURCE: Village of North Palm Beach Public Services Department, 1987. Source: Table 7-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. • V-60 Land uses in the 'coastal area are limited to residential, commercial and public lands. Single-family residential is, by far, the major land use type, with approximately 20 finger canals providing direct boat access to the Village's waterway system. The economic base of the coastal area is primarily associated with the residential character of development in the area, although John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and the commercial marinas contribute to the economy. The marinas represent water -related development and appear to meet the current demand for such facilities. There are no identified redevelopment areas within the coastal area. Water -dependent and water -related land uses within the coastal area are listed in TABLE 27. The beach and shoreline uses within the Village, including the six marina facilities, are the only water -dependent or related uses in the Village. There are no ports, electrical generating facilities, water supply utilities dependent upon surface waters, or water -related uses directly associated with any such uses in the Village, nor are any planned. Conflicts occur when one land use is deemed incompatible with another. Such a condition occured in the past along the Earman River, at the Anchorage Drive wastewater treatment site. The plant has historically been a. source of odors and documented effluent discharge violations.However, the plant was recently taken out of service by the Seacoast Utilities Authority. No other conflicts are identified. With the exception of minor infill development activities, all of the vacant land in the Village is located outside of the coastal area (Planning Area 6A). MAPS 33.1 - 33.3 and 34 depict the natural resource features within the Village. In particular, the extent and locations of mangroves, sea grasses, beach and dune systems, water bodies and certain upland areas of environmental concern are illustrated. The Village contains a variety of ecologically important marine and wildlife habitats, the majority of which are located within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park (Planning Area 1). The Park is under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), in cooperation with the County Parks and Recreation Department. The Park contains a diversity of important habitat, including mangroves, beach and dune communities, tropical and upland hammocks, mud flats and marine grasses. The master plan developed for the Park recognizes • V-61 O c cd 0 fW U al Crl E • $.4co o c. z•— w • ou OA 0 -4 O O g4 •-1 Ln 4.1 aj M 4-1 N N • E � a U •?• $ O CZ a) O V-62 MAP 33.2 DEFINED MANGROVE AREA — PLANNING AREA 6A REF: FIGURE 3-13A MONET ROAO 7i • • 40, MANGROVE AREA..., SOURCE: FDER DREDGE & FILL. PERMIT # 500655759, LAM Inc. SCALE NTS Source: Figure 3-5B, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. V EC ETATIO N 1111 MAP 33.3 WETLANDS, COASTAL VEGETATION AND MUCKS 1 MARINE VEGETATION MIXED EXOTICS AUSTRALIAN PINE MIXED HAMMOCK TROPICAL HAMMOCK If NI. 7 .f' f.• DUNE SOURCE: JOHN D. McARTHUR !MAC!! TATE PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN SCALE: NTS Source: Figure 3-5C, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. O • cn R3 TJ - -1 s4 O w U as a) co E as a -1-)m 0 z w u Oa) a)o .+1 (11 U r4 0 0 0 .o I c13 M 4-1 Z a) a) • E CI U •+4 0 w A Source: V-65 the sensitivity of existing environments and proposes appropriate development. Designated historic resources within the coastal area, per the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, are sited on the Future Land Use maps on pages VI-5 and VI-10. Two additional sites have been located in John D. MacArthur Beach State Park since that time. The sites will be located on the Future Land Use Map of Planning Area 1 during the preparation of the E.A.R. based amendments. All but one of the sites are located within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and will be afforded proper protection. The other site is located within the North Palm Beach Country Club. Future land use and development in the Village is not expected to have additional adverse effects upon estuarine conditions. Present and future shoreline development or redevelopment will be permitted in accordance with applicable State and local regulations. The Village will preserve its character as a low density residential community and continue to develop with minimal impacts on the natural environment of the estuary. Water quality within the estuarine waters of the Village has improved in recent years; however, violations of State standards continue to be observed by agencies monitoring water quality within the canals and waterways. According to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), dissolved oxygen and nutrient problems still exist in Village canals and waterways; however, water quality has improved during the past 13 years. Decommissioning of the Anchorage Park wastewater treatment plant should help to improve water quality in .the Village,. Point source and non -point sources of estuarine pollution have been identified within the Village. Point sources include the VIllage's stormwater outfalls. A review of the Village stormwater system indicates that there are approximately 50 outfall pipes discharging stormwater a into finger canals, waterways and the estuarine system. Stormwater runoff generally results in nutrient and heavy metal loadings to receiving waters. Non -point sources contributing to water quality degredation within the Village include boat and marina waste oil, lawn fertilizer and pesticides, and raw effluent from boat anchorage areas. These sources have been identified in the Palm Beach County "208" Plan and continue to persist, according to the Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD). V-66 The PBCHD has 3 sampling stations in and around Village Water bodies; however, sampling frequency is not sufficient to document specific water quality problems. Additional sampling data is available through the NPDES permit program (Phase 1 and Phase 2 application) and the Lake Worth environmental studies. These data will be included in the E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan updates. Most of the Village is served by central water and .wastewater facilities. Further, all residences in the coastal area are served by central systems. Therefore, no related water pollution problems are defined. S.R. A-1-A appears to be the only major road that could have an effect upon the coastal area, and since its length within the Village is entirely within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park, potential future improvements will come under close review by the Village, state and local government agencies with jurisdiction in the coastal area. The Village contains 20 dead-end finger canals, generally considered to have poor flushing characteristics. These canals can contribute to stagnant conditions and poor flushing, particularly during periods of flood tide and easterly winds. Further, the condition may be aggravated by the fact that stormwater drainage systems discharge directly into these canals. The condition has generally been confirmed, although no local data are available to lend technical support. The wet weather sampling program under the NPDES permit program may provide data to assess the quality of stormwater discharges. Atlantic Ocean and estuarine waters within the boundaries of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park have been designated "Outstanding Florida Waters" by the Florida Legislature. All other waters are designated "Class III". The PBCHD, FDEP, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers all have a mandate to protect water quality, wildlife habitats and coastal vegetation within the Village. Marine grasses are protected by the PBCHD and Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM). Further, DERM is currently working upon a Marina Siting Plan and a Manatee Protection Ordinance for Palm Beach County. These will be incorporated within the Village's planning program, upon completion. The 1 Beach provides for an determined to be of a hurricane. Pam County Peacetime Emergency Management Plan orderly system of evacuation of residents residing in high risk areas as a consequence The Village is located in Traffic Evacuation Zones (TEZ) 5, 6, 28 and 29. Route assignments and shelters are listed in TABLE 28. The capacity of Palm Beach Gardens V-67 TABLE 28 HURRICANE EVACUATION PLAN FOR STORM SURGE VULNERABLE ZONES Zone Boundaries 5 South of Seminole Blvd., east of ICWW to U.S. #1 (east of U.S. 1 to Earman River Canal, west of Atlantic Ocean South of Earman River Canal, east of U.S. #1, north of Silver Beach Road/ Lake Worth Inlet, west of Atlantic Ocean 28 South of PGA Blvd., east of Florida Turnpike north of Blue Heron Blvd., west of U.S. #1, south to Northlake Blvd., west to Inter- state 1-95. 29 'South of PGA Blvd., east of I-95, north of Northlake Blvd., west of U.S. #1. Route Assignment PGA Blvd., west to Mili- tary Trail (809), south to Holly Drive, east to shelter, 4245 Holly Drive Blue Heron Blvd., west to Military Trail (809) north to Holly Drive, east to shelter, 4245 Holly Drive Shelter Palm Beach Gardens High School Palm Beach Gardens High School NOT IN STORM SURGE VULNERABLE ZONE. NOT IN STORM SURGE VULNERABLE ZONE. Source: Table 7-4, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. •- V-68 High School, assigned to Village residents, is 2,410 persons. It is estimated that 5,965 persons reside within storm surge vulnerable zones (east of U.S. No. 1) in the Village. Using a 20% participation rate, 1,193 persons will require public shelters in the event of a hurricane. Estimates of 7 hours (daytime) and 9.5 hours (evening) are used by the County There are no draw bridges separating residents of the Village from the major evacuation routes. There are no hospitals within the Village, nor have any special evacuation needs of the elderly or handicapped been identified. For the purposes of this element, the coastal high -hazard areas are defined as those within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated V zones (barrier island). The Village has no development seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), nor does it have any developed areas that have experienced severe damage due to coastal storms. With the exception of S.R. A-1-A, there is no infrastructure located within the coastal high -hazard area. Post -disaster redevelopment is provided for in Chapter 161, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and the Palm Beach County Coastal Construction and Evaluation Setback Ordinance. Chapter 161 F.S. defines the coastal building zone as the land area from the high-water line to a line 1,500 feet landward of the CCCL. This area includes John D. MacArthur Beach State Park and the barrier island. Development in this area is restricted to the Park, as described in the Master Plan, including a nature center, picnic areas, ranger station and caretakers' residences. Infrastructure improvements include utilities, roadways and boardwalks. Since all of the developed urban land uses within the Village lie well outside of the coastal building zone, post disaster redevelopment would occur without regard to coastal construction controls in much the same manner that non -coastal communities would redevelop. A 2.67 mile stretch of Atlantic Ocean beach, which includes 1.5 miles within John D. MacArthur Beach State Park is referred to as "Reach 3C" by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). This area has been identified as a candidate for renourishment. A preliminary assessment estimates that 422,000 cubic yards of initial fill material is necessary to add an additional 50 feet of beach width. Offshore borrow areas will be used for the proposed renourishment program. The State Park includes a 1,700 foot elevated boardwalk that connects the Visitor Center to the beach. Pedestrian access to the beach is provided by several controlled beach access V-69 "1 points from a trail located behind the dune. Four of the five marinas in the Village are open to the general public, with the fifth (Anchorage Park) being restricted to Village residents. Only Anchorage Park has a boat ramp. Adequate parking is provided at each facility. Further analyses of each facility is provided in the Recreation and Open Space element. Existing infrastructure in the coastal area includes: Roadways; water and wastewater lines; the Anchorage Drive wastewater plant (decommissioned); and the existing stormwater drainage system. Each are discussed at length in other elements. The estimated costs, as well as funding sources and phasing of any defined improvements, are addressed in the Capital Improvements element. V-70 • F. CONSERVATION ELEMENT (1) Data and Analysis Requirement (a) The identification and analysis of natural resources. (b) The commercial, recreational or conservation use of natural resources; known pollution problems; and the potential for conservation, use or protection. (c) The analysis of current and projected water sources and needs, including quality, quantity, conservation and protective measures. Summary Many of the natural resources to be addressed in this element have been previously analyzed and mapped in either the Coastal Management Element or the Future Land Use Element. The Coastal Management Element concludes that the Village supports both a coastal dune system and an estuarine environment, including wetland vegetation and valuable marine wildlife habitats, each of which are identified and analyzed in that element. It is the intent of this element to identify any additional concerns regarding natural resources. The Village contains a highly interrelated surface water system consisting of natural waterways and manmade canals (Ref: MAP 34). Major water bodies in the Village are the Atlantic Ocean, Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW), North Palm Beach Waterway (NPBWW), Lake Worth, the Earman River (C-17 Canal) and the estuarine waters within the boundaries of the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park. Also, there are many small manmade finger canals which abut major water bodies, as well as smaller water bodies, including: North Lake; West Lake; Prosperity Harbor; and the North Palm Beach Yacht Club Marina. Surface water constitutes nearly 38% of the Village surface area. All surface waters, except the Ocean and the estuarine waters of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park are designated Class III waters by the state. The water areas of John D. MacArthur Beach State Park have been designated "Outstanding Florida Waters" by the Florida V-71 Legislature and are -afforded the highest protection under state law. The C-17 Canal and the S-44 structure provide drainage for developed areas west of the Village, including a large portion of Palm Beach Gardens. Water quality of the Earman River (C-17 Canal, east of the S-44 structure) is therefore impacted by land uses outside of the Village. Available data indicate that the discharge from the S-44 structure contains nutrient and other stormwater pollutant loadings exceeding state standards. Wetlands vegetation in the Village is described in the Coastal Management Element as containing marine grasses and mangroves. Locations of these resources are presented on MAPS 33.1 33.3. Mangroves in Planning Area 6A are the result of encroachment of trees along old mosquito control ditches in the area. The estuarine system adjacent to the barrier island (Planning Area 1) provides a variety of wildlife habitats, including marine grasses, mangroves, mud flats, beach and dune communities and tropical and upland hammocks. These communities are further discussed in the Coastal Management Element. There are approximately 1.5 miles of Atlantic beach in the Village, all of which are located in the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park. Flood plains as defined in Chapter 9J-5.003 (30), F.A.C., include the coastal area of the barrier island, portions of Big Munyon and Little Munyon Islands and the shorelines of Lake Worth, ICWW, NPBWW, West Lake, North Lake, North Palm Beach Marina and the Earman River, as well as residential lots adjacent to the finger canals located in the Village. An undeveloped area in Planning Area 6A and the Old Port Cove Area of Planning Area 2 are also included in the "A" Zone (Ref: EXHIBIT B-2; APPENDIX B). Areas identified on EXHIBIT B-2, APPENDIX B, as being in the "A" or "V" zones (darkest shade) are subject to inundation by a 100-year flood. Most of these flood prone areas are located on the barrier island and spoil islands of Lake Worth; however, some developed portions of the Village are also included. There are no commercial fisheries within the Village, although recreational fisheries, in the form of public and private marinas and docks, are supported by a fleet of recreational vehicles. The Village has no known source of commercially valuable minerals. There are no mining operations, nor does the Zoning V-72 Code permit any such activities. Soils and soil characteristics are discussed in the Future Land Use Element. The Coastal Management Element identifies Atlantic beaches within the State Park as being part of a 2.67 mile stretch of shoreline that has experienced extensive erosion in recent years. A study conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has estimated the amount of fill necessary to replentish the beach, identified potential "borrow" areas and considered the environmental impacts of the beach restoration process. Most of the developed portions of the Village along the inland waterways and canals have seawalls. Exceptions include: Earman River; the shoreline of the North Palm Beach Country Club, along the ICWW; and Lakeside Park, fronting Lake Worth. The banks of the Earman River have steep slopes and are generally not conducive to stabilized vegetation. Erosion of these banks can be expected to continue unless corrective and/or preventative measures are undertaken. A portion of the Country Club frontage, at the confluence of the NPBWW and ICWW has historically experienced •soil erosion due to tidal currents and boat wakes. A program has been implemented to correct the situation. The shoreline of Lakeside Park has also historically experienced erosion due to wave and tidal actions. A program of restoration and maintenance has been completed to preserve this resource. Present air quality conditions in Palm Beach County are generally designated as "good". The County had been placed in a "non -attainment" category for atmospheric ozone levels. However, the status has recently been upgraded to an "attainment maintenance" category. The Metropolitan Area Planning Organization (MPO), in response to the "non -attainment" designation developed a Transportation Control Program to measure and provide the means to reduce emissions of mobile sources. Likewise, the Palm Beach County Health Department developed programs to measure and reduce emissions from fixed sources. Under the new designation, an intensive monitoring program is required to monitor the maintenance of the upgraded status. Surface waters in the Village provide recreational and leisure time resources to residents and the general public. The Future Land Use Element (Ref: TABLE 10) provides an acreage breakdown of recreation/open space (197 acres) and conservation ( 385 acres) areas in the Village. The State Park is designated conservation due to its unique physical and natural resources. V-73 The potential for recreation/open space and conservation areas should be substantially the same at buildout due to the relatively small amount of vacant land in the Village. There are no commercial uses of the natural resources described in this Element and no such designations are anticipated. Estuarine pollution problems, as well as general water quality conditions, are assessed in the Coastal Management Element. Additional pollution and natural environment assessments are presented in the Future Land Use and Infrastructure Elements. The water quality data base should be updated during the preparation of the E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan amendments, using the following sources: (1) Information available from the NPDES permit application; (2) the completed Lake Worth Environmental studies; (3) data prepared by the South Florida Water Management District in preparing the regional water policy and/or SWIM programs; and (4) additional data collected by the County Health Department and Department of Environmental Resources Management.. The Village does not have any industrial land uses and thus does not generate typical hazardous wastes associated therewith. As a result, common household and commercial hazardous waste products predominate, including car batteries, pesticides, degreasing solvents and petroleum waste products. In addition, service stations and marinas are potential sources of fuel and solvent waste products, as well as leaks to surface and ground waters. The Palm •Beach County Solid Waste Authority has a program defining such wastes and provisions for collection and disposal thereof be initiated by the Village. Existing and projected potable water demand through buildout of the Village is discussed in Section V.D4. Related conservation and protective measures are discussed in Section V.D5. G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT (1) Existing Recreation And Open Space Data Requirement (1) Data which identifies existing public and private recreation sites and open spaces available to the public. Summary The Village operates and maintains a number of parks and recreation facilities. These facilities, and associated activities, are described in TABLE 29 and located on MAP 35. The recreation facilities provided by the Village are classified as either "neighborhood" or "community" in scope and as either "active" or "passive" in nature. Neighborhood facilities are located within, or near to residential areas and are primarily designed to serve Village residents. Community facilities are designed to serve the community in general both Village and non-resident populations. Active facilities represent an array of special activity facilities provided in close proximity to population centers. They often require specially constructed fields, courts or other apparatus which lend themselves to a particular user -oriented activity. Passive facilities require a resource base, such as the Ocean, lakes, woodlands or other natural areas, either natural or manmade, with which the user interacts. In addition to the facilities described in TABLE 29, the Village offers a variety of recreation and leisure activities to all age -groups, including: 1. Supervised recreation programs for youth provided during after school hours; 2. Daytime recreation programs at all parks during the summer; 3. Arts and crafts, exercise, ballet, gymnastics and other interests, based upon demand, for all age -groups; 4. Organized baseball, softball, soccer, basketball and a men's flag football program; 5. Year-round adult softball and volleyball programs; and 6. Leisure time activity clubs for senior residents. V-75 TABLE 29 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FACILITIES FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES W a H rb tn • ' -1J A 'd eu) gi HH _ rd . S-i 4 a) HaJ •s~ 1- 0 ni aJ — 0 .s4 .sue tn bbN A U En r- en bnX rd•g •0-P 'd `�4 •0 H b�.�trA en -0 , � ., .� co 0 r H N b' -al co H a) d O t CI ' r 4 0 W ))--1 O 0 0 v1 0 r-1 M ri a) a) N u0 0 (NI in it a) v u) O rd .I.J to --4J.o .%1AA a) -H 0) i!+ b O O • C) �t-� bn �1 �1J O -•-1 0 3 0 .--1 3 •'4 O. 1 4 0 0 a) W o 4J o U •N 44 u) .-1 •IJ o 4J p 1 1 1 1 a) a) > ) •r .N 4-1 En o td 4 a 0 U Country Club Neighborhood, N cn a) a, a 0. rd 0.) 4- H i� 1 •d O 'd to to 4-1 a) 3 N it/ H1J a) • • Ecn n 4 �. 0 Q, b 3 0 �+ ai r-i •njal � '-d cM N • al � cNi 0 a) •r-P A a) o ff 0 3'H-1'd O 00 0 . A b +• 4i U 4) li rd A Ri a) • -) •d rd •.{ r.1 .fl jy • )-i )-1 3- l o r-I 3 a0) 4-1 0)) -.A.00N0 .N IW > p 4J H a H r-I ra 1 1 Neighborhood, a) a) a a 'd 0 0 a a) CD 0 > > t!1 a) tD A H A 1-A in ›.1 �� w b to Ai a 2-....Osborne Park b 0 � -� w Z a) a) tn en b b 0 0 0 0 (Continued) Q1 CN H FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES z w• 1 al 1-4• A 4J a)) H O H O b cr) tr . >1 'rt) H 'd d a)'0 d •-; co a) a) a H r-1 a) 0 .d (1) 1.1 a 3-I •.� rd ,-1 -P a) al -J a) rd 4-1 H 'd a) H.0 a) .0 A .0 A 44 tT - r-1 i O tr .sG rn a) tr O 'd 14 4-1 0 r-1 O •d rd H Aft rd H-�-I - a) U .0 • -� H A u)i '0 • A 0 u) •r1 O u) a) 1.1 ,--1d a)+1 - 'd 4-) 4-40 a) 4-1 b I4 O +) N +I 0 'd . 14 cr) 't7 E A Q) O C O rd a) d I 0) m 1) +) $ -t tr r-c O H-0cv O a) 'd -Ii • N m A -- U - .0 -- O 0 (1) -0 ul 4J • a) -. a) tr H -P rd tT O 4 Cr 4 -ri 0 S..r4 In o • a) r-1 O a) -r1 O r-I 0 .0 •4-1 1.1 3 a) 4i rti •r1 d z H .0 1-1 r-1 r-1 N tr r-1 0 A •d A >r +) O rd rd .ei▪ td T1 .1 O tr U 4-1 •N a) .-4- -0 H 0 H - a) 0 to U —II ”--1 £ 'd •5 E -- -) a) -- -,4 --- ''d o 4-1 0 -- 'd 'd .s4 4-1 0 0 1-1 �C 0 r-1 -. .0 N r-1 ,--1 d 4 a) 0 4/1 a) O 01 a) u) tT >G rd •4-1 'd rd O O O rd 0 •.4 0 -.-1 rd -d H -r1 0 0 0 a) 14 O -4-1 O O .0 O a O w .A `•- to A CO rd x tr O 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Neighborhood, Lakeside Park tfl a) •'1 4J U Neighborhood, Alamanda Park a) a) •rI u) .,.-I U) u) 4i 4 w 4 w Senior Citizen's Center CO Recreation U V-77 J Also included on MAP 35 is John D. MacArthur Beach State Park, a resource -based recreation area located on the barrier island. Primary facility development was completed in 1993. Private developments within the Village often include additional recreation amenities, such as shuffle board courts, swimming pools, tennis courts and recreation buildings; however, they are not normally available to the general public. (2) Recreation And Open Space Data Analysis Requirement (a) The current need for recreation sites. Summary Current and future parks and recreation demand versus supply analyses, using Village level -of -service standards, are presented in TABLE 30. From TABLE 30, current parks and recreation needs of the Village are currently being met. Further analysis of TABLE 30 indicates that future needs, defined as a build -out situation which is expected to occur by the year 2000, will also be met. Future neighborhood parks needs will be created by residential growth in Planning Area 6A, where 96% of the remaining development potential is located. Current Village land development regulations require that 5% of the area be dedicated for parks and/or recreation purposes. As a result, it is expected that approximately 4.5 acres of additional park lands will be added to the Village inventory as a result of the development of Planning Area 6A. Approximately 3.8 acres of recreation/open space land has already been reserved in Planning Area 6A as a result of Future Land Use Plan Amendment 92-1.5B. The area is currently undeveloped. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan called for a recreational use survey and recreation facilities master plan to be completed. The survey (Sunbelt Research, Inc.) was completed in 1991, and the report entitled: "Recreation Assessment Report" (Team Plan, Inc.) was completed in 1995. The "Recreation Assessment Report" included the following tasks: 1. Review of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan and provide written comments/suggestions for expanding or upgrading the data base as appropriate. 2. Review the 1991 survey and provide written comments/suggestions for expanding or updating the data base, as appropriate. V-79 TABLE 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N u) u) u) U3 U3 U) U3 CD N u) N a-► -P -P rd V � u) -Pr-i a a W )---4 3a 34 34 r-+ r-+ R1 $4 .-4•r1Er-1 00004)4)0CD E r-i R1 O 0 0 O O .H •r-4 O 3-1 O cn 34 a 0 0 U 4-4 4-1 U Ca U di • Ln N Q1 r-i tf) UI N N CO N d' N N Wu)U]CflU)U) cn a) cou) cn 4J J TS t 4 J N 4J r-I CL a a) I-+ $4 34 3.4 ,--) (a $-1 -el -ri E r-i O 0 0 0 a) a) o a) 0 E r-1 (t O O O O O •r-1 •r-1 O 1-1 O m 1.44 aU U 044tH U Ai U d• In N 01 r-I tl In N N N N M N • • MNCO T--1 Cr) r-I O0 00 O 0 r-I r-1 \ \ �U) a) a) U 0 rtto o0 N N a Z o a H r0 a' U) a 00 Z N H OH 0 W O •r-1 F( u) co o' O r-i A g 4 a) (1 g U a 4 -r�i E U (r1 •$4 (u r-i a U z U a GQ Z 0-1 C7 RECREATION ACTIVITY cn U) W U) 4 J'UV4JN r 1 3-1 3.1 3-4 )-4 r-( 3.4 ( j-i O 0 0 0 4)a) 0 a) 0 O 0 0 0 •9-I •d-1 0 3-1 0 a U U U 4-4 44 U R1 U NCOIO d'M l0d'ttl r-I O O O O O O O O ino01no0000 Ntn1nNN0000N r-INNIOt•d'l0 •N r-1 M\\\\\\M\ (a ►-i \ 4.3 -P +) '0 'd 4-1 \ +) +) N r-, $4 $.4 1•4 rt r+ j..1 b 3a 0 4-) O 000a)a)0a)0 4-)• 0 0000•r1•r+03.1O 4-) U) to 04 U U 0 44 4-1 0 R1 0 >~ 0 0 am d' r-I r-I r-1 .--1 r-I r- I id r--I r-I 0 ' 1 ... u) (I) • 0 • r-i • 4x1 N 0 r-i 4.i A (0 1'"+ A 0 r0 A 0 • f-1 4-) U pi O rU aCD cn a r-i ni u) U)M ,--I E V .--t o \ \ \ ry r-i- A a) en (a A r-t r-I r- I Z (j 0 0 z A a) r--1 r-+ r-1 0 A 4) 0 .. •r-1 cn d-t '-t 41:1 rti al O ?t g (1) $4 a) E -rd1 a) 4-4 A A A 01 a) (1) 31 v1 U E 0 .k 4-1 a) +) 'd ?(r-( 3-1 O ?1 3.1 •r-1 0 u) M u) O 0 Ri r-1 $4 4i • l 0 • a)R14R30(dr-10 0 U)HWU)cr)Wxa1l> U W a U) r--I N M CO r- 4-1 0 4-4 0 t.fl 01 r- resident buildout population 3. Conduct a field reconnaissance and evaluation of existing recreation facilities and open space reserve sites to determine the potential for further development, as well as off -site influences affecting current and future potential uses. 4. Prepare base maps of each of the Village's four main recreation and open space facilities; Anchorage Park; Osborne Park; Community Center; and Country Club. 5. Conduct a detailed site analysis of each of the Village's four main recreation and open space facilities. 6. Prepare preliminary schematic master plans of each of the Village's four main recreation and open space facilities. 7. Conduct workshop meetings with the Recreation Advisory Board, Village Staff and others for the purposes of discussing the findings of the schematic plans. Based upon the workshop meetings, modify the schematic plans. 8. Based upon the workshops, prepare a Recreation Master Plan with facility sites located and identified by type, size and phasing, including an estimate of costs, recommended priorities and a general implementation program. The Recreation Master Plan will contain the following facilities: Anchorage Park; Community Center; Osborne Park; Country Club; Herb Watt Senior Center; Prosperity Harbor Park; Lakeside Park; F.I.N.D. lands; Urban "Hike and Bike" trails (within the Village limits); and Allamanda Park. The Recreation Master Plan is presented on MAP 36. Cost estimates were prepared only for the Village's four main recreation facilities, as follows: Anchorage Park (Concept 6) - $887,600; Community Center (Concept 3) - $340,000; Osborne Park (Concept 2) - $112,500; and Country Club (Concept 2) - $14,000. Total cost, including the above four projects, is $1,354,100. The funding mechanism(s) and construction schedule have not been prepared at this time; however, engineering and architectural work is presently under way. Engineering and architectural work, including final cost estimates, property acquisition and funding mechanisms and construction schedules should be completed during the time E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan amendments are being prepared. }OATS+ lkt. 15. 1N1 ) Village of North Palm Beach team AE niinc. NORTH > !Ov �00 IRUVIRION: 1"Go M00 SCALE: 1= MM. nC.c ape m ..<U . H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT (1) Existing Intergovernmental Coordination Data Requirement (a) The inventory of entities within the area of concern. (d) The description of existing coordination mechanisms. Summary Adjacent governments are defined as those political entities, including Palm Beach County, which share a common boundary with the Village, including: (1) City of Palm Beach Gardens; (2) Town of Lake Park; (3) City of Riviera Beach; and (4) Palm Beach County. Coordination of land use planning and development of properties adjacent to North Palm Beach is accomplished on an informal basis through available notification, review and comment mechanisms during the comprehensive planning and land development approval processes. The Village Manager is primarily responsible for implementing coordination of planning with adjacent governments. A listing of key intergovernmental issues, as well as the entities with which the Village interacts is as follows: Issue Coordination Entity State Planning & Permitting Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Regional & County Planning Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Environmental Quality And Management Treasure Coast. Regional Planning Council; Palm Beach County; Palm Beach County School Board; Palm Beach County Municipal League; Florida League of Cities. Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Florida Department of Transportation; U.S. Dept. of Transportation; Palm Beach County. Northern P.B. County Water Control Dist.; S.Fla. Water Mgt. Dist.; County Dept. of Env't. Resources Mgt.; County Health Dept.; Fla. Dept. of Env't. Protection; U.S. E.P.A. V-83 Police Protection & Law Enforcement Services Civil Defense & Disaster Planning & Preparedness Recreation Facilities Fire Protection Services Palm Beach County Sheriff; City of Palm Beach Gardens; Town of Lake Park. State Department of Community Affairs; Palm Beach County Emergency Management. Diocese of Palm Beach; First Presbyterian Church; MacArthur Foundation; Benjamin School; Florida Dept. Of Environmental Protection. City of Palm Beach Gardens; Town of Lake Park; City of Riviera Beach. Emergency Medical Services Inter -City First Aid Squad. Flood Insurance Beaches & Shores Federal Insurance Administration; State of Florida Dept. of Community Affairs. Palm Beach Countywide Beaches and Shores Council; Fla. Dept. of Environ. Protection. Low Income Housing Palm Beach County Housing and Community Dev. Dept. Utilities Provision Florida Power & Light; Bell South; Adelphia Cable; County Sanitation; Laidlaw Waste Systems; Seacoast Utilities Authority; Florida Public Utilities, Inc. A summary of existing intergovernmental coordination mechanisms, by comprehensive plan element is presented in the following paragraphs: 1. Future Land Use The Village Manager and Public Services Department are responsible for coordinating future land useplanning activities with adjacent municipalities and Palm Beach County. Coordination is accomplished primarily by means of the State's comprehensive planning process, which is coordinated by the Florida Department of Community Affairs and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC). TCRPC is also responsible for administering the V-84 Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process as well as preparing the Regional Policy Plan (RPP). 2. Traffic Circulation The Palm Beach County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible for coordinating federal, state and local transportation planning for the urban area of the County. This responsibility is established by state law, which requires such organizations in counties having in excess of 50,000 residents. In addition, the Village has contracted the County to provide engineering services on Prosperity Farms Road and several signalized intersections. Palm Beach County is responsible for road improvements to County roads within the Village, while the Florida Department of Transportation has similar responsibility for State and Federal roads. 3. Housing The private sector delivery process is currently meeting the housing needs of Village residents. However, the Village does recognize the need for public sector and public -private sector ventures to meet low and moderate income housing needs countywide. In this regard, the Village has executed an Interlocal Agreement with Palm Beach County, detailing participation in implementing the County's Five -Year Consolidated Plan. 4. Infrastructure Infrastructure services are provided by several operators and implemented by several mechanisms, which are summarized as follows: Sanitary Sewer - Seacoast Utilities Authority; Solid Waste - County Solid Waste Authority, North Palm Beach, Private Haulers (some commercial); Drainage - Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District, South Florida Water Management District, Florida Department of Transportation, Palm Beach County, North Palm Beach; Potable Water - Seacoast Utilities Authority; and Aquifer Recharge - South Florida Water Management District, County Department of Environmental Resources Management, North Palm Beach. V-85 It is concluded that these mechanisms are currently effectively serving the Village needs. 5. Coastal Management The Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD) and Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFFC), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and the Village all have statutory mandates to protect water quality, wildlife habitats and coastal vegetation within the Village. The FDEP, through its conservation and development program for John D. MacArthur Beach State Park, has assumed a major role within the Village for administration of resources on the Barrier Island in Planning Area 1. In addition, marine grasses are monitored and protected by Palm Beach County DERM, Florida DEP, FIND, and USACOE permit review processes. Water pollution problems have been defined through various sampling programs and it is concluded that a potentially effective network of environmental controls is currently in place. Two programs (NPDES permit and SWIM plan) are currently in process. These programs have the potential to provide the framework for an effective pollution control system. The Village participates in the hurricane evacuation program for the County. This program is an effective means to evacuate residents in case of emergency. 6. Conservation Coordination mechanisms and administering agencies responsible for implementing conservation related programs within the Village have been discussed in other sections. 7. Recreation and Open Space The Village currently provides facilities to residents using municipally owned, leased or shared facilities. In addition, the John D. Mac Arthur Beach State Park, operated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is within the Village limits. (2) Intergovernmental Coordination Analysis Requirement (a) The effectiveness of existing coordination mechanisms. (b) The problems identified in the plan which would benefit from improved coordination. (c) The need for additional planning coordination based on the comparison of growth proposed in the plan with the regional policy plan. (d) The coordination with any designated area of critical state concern. Summary There are no designated areas of Critical State Concern within the Village limits. Therefore, coordination with rules, principles for guiding development and development regulations in such areas do not apply. The TCRPC is the agency responsible for coordinating and implementing regional planning for a four county area, including Palm Beach County. In this regard, the TCRPC has adopted a Regional Policy Plan (RPP) oriented to implementing, from a regional perspective, 25 goals of the State Comprehensive Plan. The RPP was updated in 1995. An in depth review of the RPP was undertaken, in relation to the goals, objectives and policies of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Where necessary, language has been included to further RPP goals and policies. It is therefore concluded that Village planning efforts are consistent with the RPP and that additional coordination mechanisms are not required at this time. A summary of identified issues or problems which could benefit from improved intergovernmental coordination, by comprehensive plan element is presented in the following paragraphs: 1. Future Land Use The Village is most concerned with addressing the following issues: (1) The continued redevelopment of the Twin City Mall; and (2) coordinated redevelopment (i.e. with the Town of Lake Park) of the Northlake Boulevard corridor. Issues related to redevelopment can be best addressed by jointly working with the Town of Lake Park to develop a corridor plan and compatible development regulations. 2. Traffic Circulation Current and projected traffic volume analyses indicates that several previously identified issues no longer require planned V-87 actions, including: (1) The need for designation of S.R. A-1-A as a "constrained facility" (Planning Area 1); (2) the need for traffic distribution studies prior to consideration of additional expansion of Prosperity Farms Road, north of Lighthouse Drive; and (3) the need for additional distribution studies, prior to 1994, to determine if additional expansion of Prosperity Farms Road, south of Lighthouse Drive, is necessary. Each of these issues may resurface in the future if traffic volumes exceed those projected in SECTION V, Traffic Circulation. If future traffic volumes require that these issues be addressed anew, the Village can initiate action by formally requesting participation on the part of appropriate entities. 3. Housing Technical assistance from the Florida Department of Community Affairs should be sought to address the affordable housing assessment requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 4. Infrastructure Although adequate coordination mechanisms are in place, several issues are identified. Sanitary sewer, solid waste collection and disposal and potable water services are being adequately administered through a coordinated system of public entities. Capabilities of each participating entity are sufficient to accommodate Village needs through buildout. Analysis of the Village drainage system indicates that the system appears to be functioning adequately. A master drainage study has been delayed until such time that the NPDES permit program is in place. Permit conditions, including stormwater sampling requirements, will provide the basis for identifying specific drainage study requirements. Groundwater recharge is not defined as a problem within the Village. However, wellfield contour maps, as well as related protection zone regulations should be incorporated within the Village Future Land Use Map Series. Also, participation in the Emergency Water Shortage Program, administered by the South Florida Water Management District, insures Village participation in conserving water resources. 5. Coastal Management Additional coordination mechanisms will be necessary if a Lake Worth management program is defined. Further, the County's marina siting plan, when completed, should be incorporated within the Comprehensive Plan. 6. Conservation Stormwater quality, Lake Worth environmental management, wellfield protection and potable water conservation have been discussed in previous sections. No additional issues requiring intergovernmental coordination are defined. 7. Recreation and Open Space Analysis of current and future needs indicates a projected need for a soccer/football field facility, which has been addressed by the joint use agreement with the Benjamin School. I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (1) Capital Improvements Data Requirement (b) Location and service areas of public health and education systems. (c) The inventory of existing revenue sources and funding mechanisms available for capital improvements Summary North Palm Beach Elementary School is the only major non -municipal public facility located in the Village. The facility, and associated attendance boundaries are illustrated on EXHIBIT I-1; APPENDIX A. Current capacity of the school is 723 students, with current enrollment at 664 students. Municipal infrastructure and services are available to the school and no increases in current capacity are required to be served. The Village has a number of revenue sources to fund both operating costs and capital improvements. Revenues are grouped into two primary sources: Government Fund sources and Proprietary (Enterprise) Fund sources. The Government Fund consists of four separate funds: General Fund; Special Revenue Fund; Debt Service Fund; and Capital Projects Fund. General Fund revenues, used to finance the ordinary operations of the Village, include all sources except those which are required to be accounted for in another fund. General Fund revenue sources, for the years FY 1990 - 1995, are summarized in TABLE 31. The Debt Service Fund accounts for current debt service payments for any long-term debt or lease obligations financed by General Fund Revenues. The only function is to accumulate and disburse funds to finance current debt service. The current balance (9/30/95) is $402,699. Currently, the Debt Service Fund functions to accumulate and disburse funds to (1) Finance debt service obligations under the 1987 Series Refunding Bond (retired in FY 1995); (2) finance a capital lease for equipment to enhance the 911 telephone system; and (3) principal and interest payments on a $1,200,000 loan from NationsBank for golf course and country club improvements. V-90 TABLE 31 VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH GENERAL FUND REVENUES FY 1989/90 - FY 1994/95 Fiscal Year (Rounded to Nearest $000's) Revenue Title 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Taxes 4,306 4,157 4,180 4,617 4,977 5,418 Licenses/Permits 263 274 267 257 318 749 Intergovernmental .1,096 1,013 932 965 1,030 1,072 Service Charges 262 278 231 219 195 246 Fines/Forfeitures 114 106 116 111 73 98 Interest 171 147 99 72 105 191 Miscellaneous 49 67 82 77 116 97 TOTAL 6,260 6,042 5,908 6,318 6,814 7,870 Sources: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 1990-1995; LRM, Inc., 6/95. TABLE 32 VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH ENTERPRISE FUND OPERATING REVENUES RECEIVED 1990-1995 Fiscal Year Revenues Received* 1990 ' $1 , 327,1 43 1991 $1 , 778 , 274 1992 $1 , 809, 091 1993 $1 , 982, 377 1994 $2,348,472 1995 $2,297,362 * - Excludes contributions and investment earnings. Sources: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 1990-1995; LRM, Inc., 6/95. V-91 Each operating department has a capital outlay line item to account for financial resources in the General Fund used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by proprietary funds. The Proprietary Fund (enterprise fund) is established to account for operation of the North Palm Beach Country Club. Proprietary Fund revenues are generated entirely from fees, rental and lease income. Revenues for FY 1990 - 1995 are presented in TABLE 32. The Village has no outstanding revenue bonds. _(Series 1987 Refunding Improvement Revenue Bond was retired in FY 1994/95). A loan ($1 , 200 , 000) was taken during 1 988 /1 989 for Country Club renovations and financed by Country Club revenues. The debt will be repaid during FY 2003/04. In addition, a capital lease to finance the acquisition of computer and telephone equipment to enhance the 911 system will be paid during FY 1996/97. Annual debt service on the current obligations during the FY 95/96 - FY 1996/97 period is approximately $110,000 per year. Thereafter, through FY 2003/04, obligations will be approximately $80,000 per year. (2) Capital Improvements Analysis Requirement (a) Analysis of how the Village guides the timing and location of public facilities. (b) The fiscal implications of existing deficiencies and future needs for each type of public facility. (c) The costs of needed capital improvements. (d) The impact of new public health and education facilities and the provision of infrastructure. (e) How the community controls the timing and location of infrastructure to further the goals of the plan. Summary For the purposes of the comprehensive planning process, a capital improvement is defined any expenditure for a fixed asset (the construction, acquisition or installation of facilities) or for acquisition of land, including any studies, engineering reports or appraisals related thereto. Useful life of the asset must be one-year or more and the cost must exceed $10,000. Improvements derived from the preceding elements of the plan, which qualify as capital improvements during the 1996-2002 period are listed in TABLE 33. V-92 TABLE 33 LIST OF IDENTIFIED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 1996-97 To FY 2001-2002 Comprehensive Estimated Year Plan Element (1) Amount ($) Scheduled Future Land Use Northlake Blvd. Coridor Study. 10,000 (2) 1997 Traffic Circulation No projects defined. Housing No projects defined. Sanitary Sewer No projects defined. Solid Waste 1 packer/2 jitney trucks. Drainage, Etc. Prepare Master Drainage Plan Potable Water No projects defined. 84,000 annual 45,000 (3) Recreation/Open Space (4) Phase 1 Master Plan Implem. 2,000,000 1997 Phase 2 Master Plan Implem. 2,000,000 2000 Conservation C-17 Canal Bank Erosion Study (5) (5) Coastal Management No projects defined. Intergovernmental No projects defined FOOTNOTES: (1) - Additional projects may be added as a result of preparing the E.A.R. based amendments. (2) - Joint Study with Town of Lake Park. (3) - Timing unknown at this point. Need for study and timing thereof to be determined upon receipt of NPDES permit. (4) - To be funded annually by the City (50%) and Florida Recreation Development Assistance program grant (50%). (5) - To be defined/determined during E.A.R. based amendments. Source: LRM, Inc., 6/96. V-93 The Village uses several formal means to guide the allocation of capital funds, including: 1. Level -Of -Service (LOS) Standards: The Village formally adopted LOS standards as part of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Further, the LOS Standards were incorporated within the Village land development regulations in 1990. 2. Five -Year Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.): The Village currently utilizes the Five -Year Schedule Of Improvements, initially prepared as part of this element, as the CIP. The Schedule is reviewed and updated annually by the Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee. In addition capital expenses, such as additional solid waste collection vehicles and recreation facilities, are considered as part of the annual budget process. 3. Impact Fees: The Village does not currently levy impact fees. Further, the limited remaining development potential precludes their use as a means of raising substantial additional revenues. 4. User Charges and Connection Fees: User charges are designed to finance all or a portion of the operational costs of public facilities or services. General Fund fees are organized by department as follows: General Government: Sale of maps and publications, certifying, copying, research and miscellaneous services. Public Services: Contracted police services, emergency medical service non-resident fees and protective services. Physical Environment: Refuse collection and grounds maintenance; Culture And Recreation: Memberships, copying and postage, recreation fees, pool and tennis fees, arts and crafts, summer program, marina fees and decals and miscellaneous services. During Fiscal Year 1995, the above fees generated $262,016, or 3.3% of the General Fund revenues. Enterprise Fund user fees are organized as follows: Membership: Resident and non-resident golf, tennis pool and social memberships. Sports Activities: Golf, tennis and pool fees. V-94 Restaurant and Miscellaneous. During Fiscal Year 1995, fees generated $2,293,134, or 99.8% of the Enterprise Fund revenues. 5. Adequate Facilities Ordinance: An adequate facilities ordinance was adopted by the Village in 1990. 6. Mandatory Dedications or Fees In Lieu Of: This practice is used by the Village to provide public sites and recreation facilities. Also, streets, access waterways, easements, limited access strips and canals may be dedicated to the Village. The code also contains flexibility to negotiate other types of dedications, on an as needed basis. Local streets and drainage improvements are required to be constructed by the developer and potable water and sewer improvements are implemented through the Developer's Agreement process with Seacoast Utilities Authority, through a system of fees, charges and construction requirements. 7. Moratoria: The Village has not utilized the moritorium practice as a means to guide or allocate capital funding. 6. Intergovernmental Contracts: The Village does not currently provide services by contract to other government entities. However, many of the Village recreational facilities and cultural programs are open to non-residents for a fee. Most major infrastructure systems, including water and sewer and roads and streets are currently planned or in place to accommodate growth and development in the Village. Further, facility expansions and capacities are programmed to accommodate additional growth within the current corporate limits through build -out of the Village. All projected future growth in the Village is expected to be accommodated by in -fill activities, with the exception of Planning Area 6A. Additional facilities required to accommodate projected growth in that area are expected to be provided by developers. This conclusion should be revisited, however, if the Village entertains major annexation activities. It is anticipated that capital improvements resulting from the analyses prepared in the Comprehensive Plan will be financed using either, or a combination of the following revenue sources: General Fund revenues; grants; revenue bonds; or loans. The Five -Year Schedule of Improvements, identifying capital improvements projects identified in the Comprehensive Plan are presented in TABLE 34 (NOTE: Additions or changes to this TABLE may occur during the preparation of the E.A.R. based amendments. V-95 TABLE 34 5 YEAR SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS FY 1996-97 To FY 2000-2001 Year/Estimated Cost Project (1) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Northlake Blvd. Study 10,000 1 packer/2 jitney trucks 84,000 84,000 84,000 84,000 84,000 Master Drainage Plan 45,.000(2) Phase 1 Recreation 2,000,000 (3) Phase 2 Recreation 2,000,000 (3) Canal Bank Study (4) FOOTNOTES: (1) - Additional projects may be added as a result of preparing the E.A.R. based amendments. (2) - Timing unknown at this point. Need for study and timing thereof to be determined upon receipt of NPDES permit. (3) To be funded annually by the City (50%) and Florida Recreation Development Assistance program grant (50%). (4) - Cost and timing unknown at this point. Both to be determined during E.A.R. based amendments. Source: LRM, Inc., 6/96. General Fund capital improvements expenditure potential is projected in TABLE 35. Comparison with projects listed in TABLE 34 indicates that the Village has the capability to finance proposed projects. Recreation improvements will likely be funded with alternative sources (i.e. grant monies, revenue bonds and or loan funds). No Enterprise Fund capital improvements are projected. No new public health and education facilities are planned. As a result, there will be no impacts upon the provision of infrastructure. Prior to the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, the Village had no level - of -service standards for public facilities. Further, until recently the Village had not issued a development order for a large-scale development in several years (i.e. P.U.D. and site plan approval of projects located in Planning Area 6A). Based upon the analysis of project impacts versus service capacities, the provision of facilities to accommodate the new developments in Planning Area 6A has not been an issue. As a result of the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, in combination with subsequent amendments, level -of -service (LOS) standards were adopted. The LOS standards are presented in TABLE 36. In order to assure that LOS standards are maintained, a concurrency management system, including an Adequate Facilities Ordinance, was incorporated within Village land development regulations in 1990. The system insures that compliance with the Village LOS standards is demonstrated or provision of needed public facilities is included within the Five -Year Schedule of Improvements. TABLE 35 NORTH PALM BEACH GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL 1997-2001 (Dollars) Fiscal Surplus/ Year Revenues* Expenditures** (Defecit) 1997 7,109,119 6,860,300 248,819 1998 7,261,253 7,007,109 254,144 1999 7,416,645 7,157,062 259,583 2000 7,575,361 7,310,223 265,138 2001 7,737,474 7,466,662 270,812 * - 2.14% increase over FY 1994. Includes current expenditures, debt service and caiptal outlay. Expenditures @ 96.5% of revenues. Sources: North Palm Beach Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports; 1990-1995; LRM, Inc., 6/96. J TABLE 36 NORTH PALM BEACH LEVEL -OF -SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS Facility A. Traffic Circulation 1. Group Classification: Facility Level -Of -Service Standard Group Classification C.R. A-1-A Group A Prosperity Farms Road Group B U.S. Highway No. 1 Group C Northlake Blvd. Group C Lighthouse Drive Village Collector 2. LOS Standards Within Classification: (Refer to TABLES 4-1 & 4-2 for permissible volumes) Facility Average Daily Traffic Peak Hour C.R. A-1-A D D Prosperity Farms Road D D U.S. Highway No. 1 D D Northlake Blvd. D D Lighthouse Drive D D Sanitary Sewer: * (Urban Service Area Only) C. Potable Water:. * (Urban Service Area Only) Average Day Generation Residential - 66 gpcd Nonresidential - 1,060 gpad Maximum Day Generation Residential - 104 gpcd Nonresidential - 1,721 gpad Average Day Generation Residential - 99 gpcd Nonresidential - 1,874 gpad Maximum Day Generation Residential - 147 gpcd Nonresidential - 2,782 gpad Storage Capacity Av. Daily Flow x 0.5 * - The above rates are to be used only as a planning guide for the Village. Actual determination of flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, main extension and tax charges shall be negotiated by individual property owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority by Developer's Agreement. V-99 • TABLE 36 (Continued) NORTH PALM BEACH LEVEL -OF -SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS D. Solid Waste: Average Generation Rate Residential: Single -Family - 0.926 tpcd Multiple -Family - 0.588 tpcd Non -Residential: 6.0 tons/acre/year E. Drainage: Design Storm (Interim LOS: Ref: 3-Year frequency, 24 hour Policy 2.1; Sanitary Sewer duration (one -day); Solid Waste, Drainage, Rainfall intensity curve, Potable Water and Natural as established by the South Groundwater Aquifer Florida Water Mg. Dist. Recharge element) . Groundwater Recharge G. Recreation/Open Space Impervious Area Residential Single-family - Main bldg. first floor area shall not exceed 40% of the total lot area. Multiple -family - Main bldg. first floor area shall not exceed 35% of the total site area. Non-residential - Main bldg. first floor area shall not exceed a minimum of 35% of the total site area; however, specific district regulations as per the Village Zoning Code shall apply. Unit/Population Neighborhood Parks - 2 ac/1,000 Community Parks - 1 ac/1 , 000 Beaches- 1 mile/31 , 250 Marinas - 1 slip/2,500 V-100 TABLE 36 (Continued) NORTH PALM BEACH LEVEL -OF -SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS G. Recreation/Open Space Unit/Population Boating - 1 ramp/6,250 Golf Courses - 9 holes/30,000 Swimming - 1 pool /31 , 250 Tennis - 1 court/2,500 Basketball - 1 court/6,250 Shuffleboard - 1 court/6,250 Baseball/softball -.1 field/7,200 Football/soccer - 1 field/4,800 Handball/racquetball - 1 court/6,000 Volleyball - 1 court/7,200 NOTE: Non-residential includes the following land use types: Commercial; Public Buildings; Educational; and Other Public Facilities. Source: 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan, as amended. SECTION VI FUTURE LAND USE AND TRAFFICCIRCULATION MAPS AT TIME OF SUBMITTAL -1996 A. FUTURE LAND USE MAPS The Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan was adopted, by Ordinance 23-89, on November 9, 1989. The Future Land. Use Map consisted of a series of maps, one for each of the defined Village Planning Areas, which are illustrated on MAP x. The Future Land Use Classification System is presented in FIGURE x and the Future Land Use Map Key is presented in FIGURE x. Future Land Use Maps, for each of the Village Planning Areas, at the time of adoption, are presented on MAPS x - xx. MAPS x - xx include all amendments (NPBCP Amendments 90-2, 92-1, 92-2 and 96-1) which were adopted subsequent to Ordinance 23-89, whichresulted in changes to the Future Land Use maps of the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. B. FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION MAP The current Future Traffic Circulation Map, of the Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan, is presented on MAP x. The only changes to the 1989 Plan are those resulting from Village boundary changes due to annexation of unincorporated areas. FUTURE LAND USE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM For purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the following land use classifications, which are applicable to North Palm Beach, are used to describe existing future land uses in the Village. The classifications are consistent with those defined in Chapter 9J5, F.A.C. and concurrent with the Villages perception of use. Residential: Commercial: Recreation/ Open Space: Conservation/ Open Space: Public Build- ings & Grounds: Educational: Other Public Facilities: Transporta- tion: Water: Land uses and activities within land areas used predominantly for housing and excluding all tourist accommodations. Land uses and activities within land areas which are predominantly related to the sale; rental and distribution of products and the provision e€ or performance of services. Land uses and activities within land areas where recreation occurs and lands which are either developed or vacant and concerned primarily with active or passive recreational use. Land uses and activities within land areas "designated" for the primary purpose of conserving or protecting natural resources or environmental quality, and includes areas designated for such purposes, or combinations thereof, as passive recreation, flood control, protection of quality or quantity of ground water or surface water, flood plain management, fisheries management, and/or protection of vegetative community or wildlife habitats. Permitted land uses shall include single-family housing units. Lands and structures that are owned, leased, or operated by a government entity, such as libraries, police stations, fire stations, post offices, government administration buildings, and areas used for associated storage of vehicles and equipment. Also, lands and structures owned or operated by a private entity and used for a public purpose such as a privately held but publically regulated utility. Land use activities and facilities of public or private primary or secondary schools, vocational and technical schools, and colleges and universities licensed by the Florida Department of Education, including the areas of buildings, campus open space, dormitories, recreational facilities or parking. Land uses and activities within land areas concerned with other public or private facilities and institutions such as churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, homes for the aged and infirm, and other similar uses. Land areas and uses devoted to the movement of goods and people including streets and associated rights -of -way. All areas covered by water or any right-of-way for the purpose of conveying or storing water. Source: LRM, Inc., 2/88; 3/92 VI-2 Rev: 10/16/89; NPBCP Amendment 92-2 MAP KEY: FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES LAND USE CATEGORY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (FEWER THAN 5.80 UNITS/ACRE) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (5.81 TO 11.00 UNITS/ACRE) THIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (11.1 TO 24.0 UNITS/ACRE) .COMMERCIAL RECREATION/ OPEN SPACE: CONSERVATION/OPEN SPACE PUBLIC BUILDINGS/ GROUNDS EDUCATIONAL OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION WATER PATTERN r\,\.)0.\\ 111,1.11101111 it 11 FACILITY NAME REF: 7IGUnE 3-14 Source: Table 3-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November,1989. VI-3 • 0' tNi m C 4.1 •-• E E rt •• 1.4 •• > 0 cn VI-4 ...... - = it.,'� .yt-yr r •.. . i. J::s 1i . �• :f , ..y.)p J 8P8215 r ? 89679 tt'► s e. 4 • ' ':.:i: ty w f •��{ •x.J'f .. m KEY: Corporate Limit Planning Area boundary sssssssssssssssssss ReCer to Land User Tables 3-1 and 3r2 Historic Site Florida State Master Pile *- 8P9 79 AMENDMENT 92-2: 3-_Y-aad-3-88 3-1 and 3-2 8P8214 . 111,11 --3 : PLANNING AREA 1 EARMA►N RIVER (C-1 i CANAL) . CON '1 FUTURE LAND USE MAP .A 1 LITTLE • ;; FUTURE LAND USE ra MA1999R1ES • r` I it NORTH PALM i . .s•,s,,,,.,,,..i.....t.iliwt11ttlf1T1s BEACH PLCIRICu► _.,._tom 1. w \ • •IVACte Lail, IMC.3/11I ,1a..E, nu Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 - Source.: Figure 3-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. VI-5 • 96-1.1 • r_ •—t -s '-1 •i • �I 111.f111 1111= \ t•�...1 +' II�1 t t � Ifl II ,,,,,,,,,\,,'= 96-1.3 3 A ttttttttt;r --i = _ 92-1.1 'WELVE OAKS 31.2 Acres 197 Units 17-SF 54-Duplex =j 126-MF a a 7r 71.1 i1 I =3 R-2(Cty) to RH(N.P.B.) _ :11_. sME 1111 UMss� s� ` j•..Cl. is it .' .. i. �• C. } • • .. 1 1 96-1 .2 11 • :NION aOA0 Ti T1 T1 r rrr r -r1Tt'^Tr:TrrrtT \!'- Z —QC12 .414 C �1�URCC .LRM,- = Rev: ^e^ ..;,a :. . - - ?�- t 4. �,,...t,tt KEY: !.23r7ortte I ttlt f P1 analog r1Pei 3aunaar7 11111tsn,011a1111'oo,'S R•ier to Clad cis: Tables 3-1 Ind 3-2 Ririe to !ecial Poiic7 S.2 ,41eACies1 t 3oundary OM s s M s %C. MAP AMENDMENTS 92-1.1 - Twelve Oaks 96-1.1 - Benjamin School 96-1.2 - Commercial • • 0 96-1.3 - Benjamin School • 0 o y o '' ; L FUTURE LAND USE MAP =, FUTURE LAND USE SERIES • � r► • 1999 PLANNING AREA 2 ♦ • ♦ ft ft • • ft ♦ testi VI-6 • N 1 I G. C 0- • CJa.CG N Cr) a a• ILI cn cn W = cn Z Z a • 'J W . CD - 1 W co C) LLI CD u. :slit,,,,+ s+++s PLANNING •OU110E: Lail, INC.2/411 Revised: NPBCP Amendment 92-2 VI-7 t 1t111.. . �,,,, K : - iv •: - ; — . Corporate Limit l'7 t { ^ Planning Area Boundary .....t�.� 1�=� ` =� `1 Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 nd 3-2 I ,:si ' �, AMENDMENT 92-2: k.r r% = -2:-and-3-25 3-1 and 3-2 \- n. = 17 I I I I I • I 0 I • 13 I - - . • a SO w `° oll 11. all • - - wee/ • - ell •OY11Ctt t.I . INC.2/II • • • • FUTURE LAND USE .MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 3B NORTH PALM --� - BEACH fLoaucA. ,,,EARUAH RIVER (C-1T CANAL)'$$ I I I I 0 200 •600 1000 FEET Revised:- NPBCP Amendment 92-2 Source: Figure 3-5, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. VI-8 m • VNO'Ft Crk LAK ` (C-17 CANAL) s W cc EARIAAN 0 0 lY 11.1 SOURCE: LQ11, INC.2/SS Amendment Revibed: VI-9 m • ....." 1.7-1::!q4 i '11,21.'.-.-i.--fRii--.! ::..y Nr Mj oppeoft • 1 • 1 1, 1 1 I t f 1 1 1 1 1 t 11/0V11C11 Ogle, INC../I$ 4. W4 t 4"Rh,'+ r • KEY: Corporate Limit Planning Area Boundary susuinnsss'su.ur Refer to Land Uss Tables 3-1 and 3-i Historic Site *' Florida State Master Filo * - art3107 AMENDMENT 92-2: 3-2;-and-3-28 3-1 and 3-2 81213107 * • so FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES". 1999 PLANNING AREA 4A • The Oakes Building is no longer in existence; however, reference shall be retained until deleted from the Florida Master Site File. NORTH PALM BEACH e=ucm=a.► I I I o 200 600 1000 FEET Revise. ";PB^P ':me erne^- _-_ Source:.Figure 3-7, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. VI-10 w •i•„.NPB J •• ,I 1 • // ..��, \` . �11 W F WA TER WA Ytrtrrr-„�ws"_ i I � � 1 I • t oh A 4 2 4 0 ac 2 4 ac 4 W• • ai U ro c. c ar a 0 0 y 4a ra 0 a) 0 +1 a re aU to co 0 0 O C y � 'p L C a! y E 4 as J a Q as ctEC l_ w O W 2 GI aa w22 Q cn cn Z Z Z < w .• a CCw M E•• U LL 0 u. c.1 C/� N • •i sW 4.013 • W •a EU m az. v il y a cti • rCi 9-4 CD Ord O O w E cc! U cn ct7 cti a) W � Q1 Ec0 r-i 41 a 4a� O E o z - 4-4 O oz O U •. O us all ft r-I a o •r4 N a t co cn M a) N • 01 E -r+ 0 wv •OUNCE: LAM. *NC.2/ss VI-11 4-4 N Co CA re Z"111 Ili C zm O z rt. 42 re 4cv 4 4) ,-r 4) 4.4 C $4 A O Ear' Ord V U m Z N 1 CO I Z N p: Cs v O C E- 44 r0 Z ,- 1:11 Z m A V >w ZE 4 4 ra+• Residential ATTACHMENT A2-2 . J Ca rn E OD CR a AMENDMENT Residential NPBCP Amendment 90- 2 3. • s U t 0 VI-1 2 -' 1 _;� 92-1.2 ;_•� PROSPERITY HARBOR NORTH _ 33.4 Acres 98 SF Units _f R-3(Cty) to RL(N.P.B) .I� ow F.;_ At\ \ ‘\s‘s. is" ll 1 52 92-1.3 SANCTUARY BAY 1 42 29.8 Acres 1:41. 232 NF Units ;•~: l`:::::::::::::::. : RVRH to R11 .a:•tt<s•. :aa.s:• :11111•.11111&:.a s -s.. FIGURE 3-10 _ 1 I l "wit g= I l 1 1 l l l l l I t 1, l, I I l t l l l, 1 l 1 I1 _ .r a s fat it i r a a - a a a 1'I K-v • Cor,crlte 1 iai t 11 P? ins 1 ng Arta 8onadar;► .f...............®e 1" Refer to Lead Use Tables 3-1 ad 3-2 11= Refer to Special Folic: 3.3 .+.......-• 11: Anenmea t 8oandirr .s — „ IMO s Ili • 1 1 1 1 II 1 1( l 1 _ 1 1( I l T t t l I l cr. `92-1.SA PROSPERITY PARER SOUTH 63.47 Acres IJ: 108 SF Units RL/Rf1/RH to RL ,42 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES MAP AIKENDMMENTS 92-1.2 - Prosperity Harbor North 92-1.3 - Sanctuary Bay 92-1.4 - Sanctuary Cove 92-1.5A-. Prosperity Harbor South 92-1.5B- Village Park 96-1.4 - Prosperity Harbor North .t+ temP • • • %y :�,� 1999 /� J 1 -_':ffffff I _ ■aaaaaaaais *:N NG AREA 6A 1�� /2-1.39 V!UA6EPART( PRGZaF.3t- :rE 3.12Atrmm HARBOR •: •::•- to ROM I " 1111611Wa oz fi t•t f t t -. SOURCE: LRM, :nc. v: Amendment 92-1; 96-' - , ' NQ A-17-i PALM �.M I • I 0 200 d00 1000 FEET VI-13 RM 'RCSPEfITY -tArt0II D{( 11,I1I!__' 1211 111111III3I �1 .,. ..Rti. •• . rc r .. • .. • • • _COPE 4H $OURCtI LR11. tMC.2,$ • WEST LAKE • KEY: Corporate Limit Planning Area Boundary r•t..ui•111ai....... Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 and 3-2 AMENDMENT 92-2: 4-2 -and-3-28 3-1 and 3-2 FUTURE —LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 1999 PLANNING AREA 68 • NORTH PALM BEACH aRLosucu. I I I 0 200 600 1000 FEET Revised: NPBC? ;men^mer.: -2 Source: Figure 3-11, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; November, 1989, as amended. VI-1 4 FIGURE C-12 FUTURE LAND USE MAP FUTURE LAND USE MAP SET1IES 1999 PLANNING AREA KEY: Corporate limit Planning Area Boundary Refer to Land Use Tables 3-1 Refer to Special Policy 5.2 Amendment Boundary and 3-2 41.410-08.011111..111.110 a.-a.a.EMI MAP ANE MENTS 92-1.4 - Fisherman's Village 92-1.7 - First Unitarian Church 92-1.8 - Vacant Residential Lot Nit lye' I-lf I.'►F tlh1 TitaaaataaiTt s••��1r NORTH PA LN1 BEACH FLOtatCA 0 200 600 1000 Li FEET SOURCE: LRM, Inc. Rev: Amendment 92-1 • I•1j/111111 ESL r am 00.1 RM M PSG "4 c —:. vl� 'J C 4T RE3ID vT•,I 1 -- �...u�. 1 ln� 3.25 Acres :,-ar^►,,' :o ;,I 'N,? 92-1.4 FISHERMAN'S VILLAGE 4.5 Acres 48-Duplex Units R-5(Cty.) to Ri(N.P.B) 92-1.7 'FIRST tN1TARIA4 CHURCH 2.54 Acres R-5(Cty) to OPF(N.P.B.) VI-1 5 SECTION VII STATEMENT OF MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT, PHYSICAL DETERIORATION, LOCATION OF LAND USES AND SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS RELATED THERETO HAVING AN IMPACT UPON THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VII. STATEMENT OF MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT, PHYSICAL DETERIORATION, LOCATION OF LAND USES AND SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EFFECTS RELATED THERETO HAVING AN IMPACT ON THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. A. Accuracy And Use Of Population Projections. Permanent and seasonal estimates and projections, assuming buildout of the Village by 1995, were prepared in the Future Land Use element, as follows: 1. Resident Population: 1987 - 1 2, 782; 1994 - 1 4, 322; 1995 - 14,484; and 1999 - 14,484. 2. Seasonal Population: 1987 - 1 , 784; 1994 - 2,120; 1995 - 2,143; and 1999 - 2,143. 3. Peak Day Population (Resident plus Seasonal): 1987 - 1 4, 566; 1994 - 1 6, 442; 1995 - 16,627; and 1999 - 16,627. The above projections were based primarily upon the assumption that buildout of residential projects in Planning Area 6A would occur by 1995. Since no development took place in Planning Area 6A during the 1987-1994 period, projections must be recalculated. Projections prepared as part of the Evaluation & Appraisal (EAR) update, per the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (Section V), are as follows: 1. Resident Population: 1995 - 11,844; 2000 - 12,833; and 2005 - 12,833. 2. Seasonal Population: 1995 - 1 , 686 ; 2000 1,824; and 2005 - 1,824. 3. Total Population (Resident plus Seasonal): 1995 - 1 3, 51 0; 2000 - 14,657; and 2005 - 14,657. VII-1 The above projections, once again, are based upon the assumption that development potential in Planning Area 6A, as well as remaining limited infill development potential will be realized during the 1995-2000 period. B. The Actual Versus Anticipated Rate Of Development. At the time of adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, the anticipated rate of development, assuming the buildout of Planning Area 6A, was projected, as shown in the following table: Year/Acreage Land Use 1987 1994 1999 Residential 765.72 847.16 856.73 Commercial 143.37 169.50 169.50 Rec./Open Space 196.98 196.98 196.98 Cons./Open Space 384.70 388.70 388.70 Public Buildings And Grounds 14.08 14.08 14.08 Educational 14.58 14.58 14.58 Other Public Facil. 49.87 49.87 49.87 Transportation 268.59 286.70 286.70 Water 1,225.10 1,225.10 1,225.10 Vacant 1 41 .31 1 1 .81 0.00 TOTAL ACRES 3,204.48 3,204.48 3,204.48 The above table indicates that buildout of development potential was projected to occur within the existing corporate limits. However, buildout did not occur, as previously discussed and several annexation actions (summarized in Section IV) were taken. As a result projections need to be updated. Updated projections, per the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT ( Ref: Section V) are presented in the following table: Year/Acreage Land Use 1996 2000 2005 Residential 810.71 956.60 956.60 Commercial 157.66 165.16 172.31 Rec./Open Space 196.98 200.80 200.80 Cons./Open Space 384.70 384.70 384.70 Public Buildings And Grounds 1 4.0 8 1 4.0 8 1 4.0 8 Educational 14.58 14.58 14.58 Other Public Facil. 49.87 49.87 49.87 Transportation 269.98 269.98 269.98 Water 1,225.10 1,225.10 1,225.10 Vacant 169.08 1 1 .1 5 4.00 TOTAL ACRES 3,204.48 3,204.48 3,204.48 VII-2 C. Effects Of Concurrency Requirements. Concurrency requirements have had no effect upon development within North Palm Beach since the time of adoption. Growth, as indicated in the section above, has been minimal, due to unexpected inactivity in Planning Area 6A, and therefore had limited effects upon service provision. Four residential projects in Planning Area 6A (142 acres in total) have received Planned Unit Development approval and concurrency determinations. Therefore, concurrency is not expected to be issue through buildout of the current corporate area. D. Maintenance And/Or Achievement Of Level -Of -Service (LOS) Standards. The LOS standards adopted in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, as updated by Amendment 92-2 (traffic circulation only) been maintained. E. Coordination Of Development With The Provision Of Public Facilities And Services. All development activities (i.e. solely infill within existing developed areas) within the Village since the time of adoption have been coordinated with service providers. Further, the four major projects remaining to be developed in Planning Area 6A have received concurrency determinations resulting from the planned unit development approval process. F. The Relationship Between Actual Versus Projected Revenues And Expenditures Regarding Capital Improvements. Village General Fund revenue and expenditure projections were included in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. A summary of those projections are presented in the following table: ($ Millions) Fiscal Projected Projected Projected Year Revenues Expenditures Balance 1990 7.11 6.70 0.41 1991 7.66 7.22 0.44 1992 8.26 7.79 0.47 1993 8.91 8.40 0.51 1994 9.60 9.05 0.55 Actual revenues and expenditures, extracted from Village Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports were as follows: VII-3 Fiscal (S Millions) Year Revenues Expenditures Balance 1990 6.26 5.80 0.46 1991 6.04 5.64 0.40 1992 5.91 5.69 0.22 1993 6.33 5.78 0.55 1994 6.80 6.00 0.80 1995 7.87 6.33 1.54 From the above tables, both revenues and expenditures were over estimated. However, the balances (net income) were relatively accurate, if somewhat conservative. As a result, it is concluded that revenue and expense projections, as they relate to the Village's ability to fund capital improvements was not a problem during the 1989-1994 period. G. The Generation And Status Of New Revenue Sources. The Village has not generated any new revenue sources since the time of adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, nor are any additional sources anticipated. H. The Extent To Which Physical Deterioration Of Buildings, Infrastructure, Recreation Facilities And Parks Have Effected The Need For Replacement And/Or Rehabilitation. Potable water and wastewater system improvements to correct existing deficiencies were outlined in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. These deficiencies have been corrected by Seacoast Utilities Authority. Village annual maintenance programs and have been adequate to preclude any major solid waste and drainage facilities replacement and/or rehabilitation expenditures. Some Village recreational facilities are in need of renovation and/or replacement. These improvements are itemized in the report entitled Recreation Assessment Report, completed by the Village in March, 1995. Further discussion of this report, as well as needed improvements, are presented in Section V. The major issue regarding rehabilitation and/or replacement in the Village centers around the Twin City Mall, a major community retail center, which has fallen into a state of disrepair and partially closed due to the loss of several major tenants several years ago. The problem is compounded since the facility is within two municipal jurisdictions; the Village and the Town of Lake Park. The Village and Town have cooperated by creating a special zoning district to coordinate and expedite redevelopment efforts by the private sector. VII-4 I. The Extent Of Physical Deterioration Of The Housing Stock. In the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, it was concluded that all of the housing stock was in standard condition. The results of a current windshield survey of the structural condition of the housing stock results in the conclusion that the Village housing stock remains in standard condition. J. The Location Of Development In Relation To Existing Infrastructure. The location of development in relation to existing infrastructure is not a problem. Major roadway, water, wastewater and solid waste systems are in place to accommodate existing development. Further, development since the time of adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan has been minimal and able to be served, nor is expected future growth perceived as a problem, as discussed above. K. The Actual Location Of Development In Relation To Where Development Was Anticipated In The 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Development within the corporate limits has been substantially less than anticipated in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan due to the lack of development in Planning Area 6A. Actual development during the 1989-1996 period has consisted of infill of residential lots in approved subdivisions, minor. commercial development and an increase of developed area resulting from annexations. The annexations were not anticipated; however, their impacts have either been minimal or properly planned, as previously discussed. L. The Location Of Development In Relation To The Maintenance Of Environmentally Sensitive Areas, If Appropriate. Environmentlly sensitive areas were identified in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan (Ref: EXHIBITS 3-13A-C). No development has occurred in these areas since the time of adoption. However, projects have received planned unit development approval in Planning Area 6A. Developments, through the planned unit development approval process, have been designed to preserve and/or mitigate defined vegetative species in this area. Further discussion of environmental characteristics of the Village is presented in Section V. VII-5 There are wetlands identified within the Village (Planning Area 6A), which are identified on FIGURE 3-13B of the Future Land Use Map Series. Preservation and/or mitigation of these areas are addressed in the associated planned unit development approvals discussed above. There are no public water wells within the Village limits; however, the portion of the Village located south of the Earman River is located in the least restrictive wellfield protection zone ("Zone 4"), as designated by the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM). Only non-residential uses which store, handle or produce any regulated substance (unless they qualify as a general exemption or receive an operating permit) are prohibited. There are no Areas of Critical State Concern within the Village limits. M. Social And Economic Effects Of Any Major Problems, Including A Description Of The Effects. The only identified problem having negative social or economic effects is the deterioration of the Twin City Mall. At one time, the Mall was the center of retail activity in the vicinity; however, since its demise, the U.S. Highway No. 1 and Northiake Boulevard commercial corridors have stagnated as well. A key to the rejuvenation of commercial activity in the Village is the renovation and/or redevelopment of the Mall. Initial efforts in this regard, the adoption of a joint zoning ordinance and development approval procedure by the Village and the Town of Lake Park, have been completed. It is concluded that this effort has provide the incentive for private interests to commence redeveloping the Mall site. SECTION VIII COMPARISON OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE 1989 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH ACTUAL RESULTS INTRODUCTION The evaluation performed in this SECTION will provide the basis for re-examination of the objectives of each Element of the 1989 Village of North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan to determine whether or not they were achieved or continue to express targets that are desired during the next period of plan implementation consistent with new planning time frames to be included in the revised plan. In addition, each Element will be reviewed in relation to changes in law (Chapters 163 and 187, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code), as well as changes in the Regional Policy Plan which have occurred since the date of initial adoption to determine if consistency therewith has been maintained. Objectives are evaluated in the following paragraphs to determine if they have been achieved and if consistency has been maintained. If objectives have not been achieved, reasons are identified. Potential reasons why objectives may not have been achieved include the following: 1. Fiscal/budgetary constraints; 2. Technical infeasibility; 3. Political constraints; 4. Legal constraints; 5. Administrative constraints; 6. Needed knowledge or expertise is not available; 7. Objective is vague or not measurable so that the extent or degree to which it has been attained cannot be determined; 8. Objective is not reasonably related to the public welfare; thus the objective is ill-conceived, or is no longer reasonable related to existing and projected conditions and therefore should be revised; 9. Objective does not have adequate implementing policies providing sufficient direction, or these policies are vague, inconsistent, weak or not reasonable related to the accomplishment of the objective; 10. The objective, or its implementing policies, duplicate an existing state or federal permitting program; 11. The objective lies outside of the lawful powers of the local government; and/or; 12. Other (to be defined, as necessary). For objectives which have not been attained, revisions to the adopted Comprehensive Plan are presented. For objectives which were not achieved for reasons 1-6, the E.A.R. will recommend revisions so that they will be less subject to the identified constraint(s). VIII-1 For objectives which were not achieved for reason 7, the E.A.R. will recommend revisions so that they will be more specific and measurable. For objectives which were not achieved for reason 8, the E.A.R. will recommend revisions so that they will be more reasonably related to protecting public welfare, and to be based upon current data. For objectives which were not achieved for reason 9, the E.A.R. will recommend revisions so that they will more specifically describe how the regulation of land development, the provision of public facilities and programs and other activities of local government will be initiated, modified or continued. For objectives which were not achieved for reason 10, the E.A.R. will recommend revisions to implementing policies to 'ensure that existing state and federal permitting programs are not duplicated and that the plan includes planning requirements and guidelines for developing regulations within the City's purview. For objectives which were not achieved for reason 11, the E.A.R. will recommend deleting the objective and its implementing policies, if it is clearly indicated that the subject matter is beyond the legal powers of the local government and is not an issue to be addressed by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, or Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. For objectives which were not achieved for reason 12 (other), an explanation will be provided, along with appropriate corrective action(s). For objectives which were achieved, a recommendation will be included to: (1) Delete the objective, if it is no longer applicable; (2) revise the objective to make it appropriate to current circumstances; or (3) revise the objective to reflect continuing or ongoing circumstances. In some instances, the measureability of an objective has been assigned to a policy or policies. In those instances, the policy or policies will be evaluated. Any corrective actions necessary to attain consistency between an Element and updated legal requirements is presented in SECTION IX. VIII-2 A. FUTURE LAND USE GOAL: Ensure that the current character of North Palm Beach is maintained, while allowing remaining vacant parcels to be developed in a manner consistent with present residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. Further, ensure that the Village remains primarily a residential community offering: (1) a full range of municipal services; (2) diversity of housing alternatives consistent with existing residential neighborhoods; (3) commercial development opportunities compatible with established locational and intensity factors; and (4) a variety of recreational activities and community facilities oriented to serving the needs and desires of the Village. Various land use activities, consistent with these Village character guidelines, will be located to maximize the potential for economic benefit and the enjoyment of natural and man-made resources by residents and property owners, while minimizing the potential threats to health, safety and welfare posed by hazards, nuisances, incompatible land uses and environmental degradation. AMENDMENT: The Future Land Use Element has been amended five times (Amendments 90-1, 90-2, 92-1, 92-2 and 96-1) since the initial plan was completed. Detailed discussions of these amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are five objectives, supported by 33 policies in this Element, as amended. Fifteen of the policies are "Special Policies" which focus on a specific land use issue and/or parcel of land. CHANGES IN CONDITION: Population, household and land use projections, per the 1989 Comprehensive Plan overstated actual growth, primarily due to assumptions regarding the pace of development in Planning Area 6A. Revised projections are presented in SECTION V. The Element has been amended several times to accommodate annexation actions. The deteriorated status of the Twin City Mall located in Planning Area 5 was not noted in the initial plan. Deteriorating conditions of this facility, along with its effect upon the Northlake Boulevard corridor should be addressed in the updated Comprehensive Plan. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Future Land Use Element, as amended, has been effective in terms of guiding land use activities, providing the basis for developing land development regulations and guiding annexation actions. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. VIII-3 -) MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: The major problem of development is the renovation of the Twin City Mall, as well as the maintenance of Northlake Boulevard as a viable commercial corridor. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: The deterioration of the Twin City Mall is cited as the major problem of development; however, due to its status, an opportunity has been created to address the problem. The facility is located partially within the Village and partially within the Town of Lake Park. The problem of potentially conflicting development regulations, coupled with the multiple ownership of the facility has made any redevelopment efforts difficult. However, the Mall's deteriorated status has lead to a cooperative effort between the Village and the Town of Lake Park to implement the C-3 Regional Business District Ordinance, which contains special regulations and procedures that are integrated with those of Lake Park to avoid conflicts and promote reuse and/or renovation of the facility. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Future Land Use Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. The Future Land Use Element is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revised by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Future Land Use Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Future Land Use Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. F.A.C. 9J-5.006 contains some revised requirements since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which will be addressed during the preparation of the E.A.R. based amendments. A summary of the revised requirements is as follows: Section Required Action 9J-5.006(1) New requirements to identify and map potable waterwells and dredge and spoil sites. 9J-5.006(2) New requirements to analyze the need for additional dredge and spoil sites and to analyze development and redevelopment based on hazard mitigation reports. VIII-4A 9J-5.006(3)(b) 9J-5.006(3)(c) 9J-5.006(4) New or revised requirements for objectives to address: (1) Coordination of coastal populations with local hurricane plans; (2) the provision of dredge and spoil sites; and (3) coordination of land uses with hazard mitigation reports. New or revised requirements for policies to address: (1) The availability of public facilities concurrent with development impacts; (2) designation of appropriate land uses within wellfield protection areas; and (3) designation of dredge and spoil disposal sites. New or revised mapping requirements for: (1) Transportation management concurrency areas; (2) potable water wellfield protection areas; and (3) coastal high hazard areas. 9J-5.006(4)(c) Revised requirement for mixed land uses. 9J-5.006(5) New urban sprawl provisions for amendments. The revised requirements, as well as preparation and adoption of appropriate Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be completed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Future Land Use Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as update them to reflect current conditions, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Recommended Action/Wording Revise to reflect the ongoing need adopted land development regulations. Revise to .reflect the ongoing need adopted land development regulations. No change. No change. to implement to implement Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. Land development regulations shall contain planned development provisions which allow design VIII-4B flexibility within projects under unity of title as a means of preserving or protecting Conservation Use lands designated on the Future Land Use Map Series. 1.7 No change. 1.8 No change. 2.1 No change. 2.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 2.3 No change. 2.4 No change. 2.5 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to consider designating historic sites. 3.1 No change. 3.2 No change. 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 No change. No change. No change. No change. 5.1 Delete due to implementation of C/OS Future Land Use Category and Zoning District. 5.2 Revise to reflect current status of the subject parcel, while protecting private development rights. 5.3 Revise to reflect the current status of the subject parcel. 5.4 5.5 No change. No change. 5.6 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 5.7 Delete due to action by the City of Riviera Beach. 5.8 No change. VIII-5 5.9 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. VIII-6 lations which: •1 4-4 E 0 D a) 73 c� 0 •I 0 a~ ,I E 0 Ti 0 -I conditions. flood a) a) • c� M ht a) a) oct 0o '� w as E E on • 1 cz 0 ai .• 1-441) O ai iferation of ur 42 •I 1/45 •I W V 0 ti a) 4-I O ,� U I .0 tu g § c,:s .t., 1.4 PA O co OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON rra�h Ir' CURRENT CONDITION Updated Land Development Regulations. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Existing Village Code of Ordinances. MEASURABLE TARGET By 1990, adopt implementing LDR's per Policy 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8. A Eg r0 F c U� O z 0 0 U E 0 i 0 Existing Village Code of Ordinances. to A• b c4 5 a) N g cV o •-4 � cV o ON VIII-7 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON cn CURRENT CONDITION Updated Land Development Regulations. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Existing Village Code of Ordinances. MEASURABLE TARGET By 1990, adopt Concurrency Management System and LDR's requiring conveyance of rights -of - way. (OBJ. 3) OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON cn CURRENT CONDITION • Current coordination mechanisms. Current Future Land Use Plan. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Existing coordination mechanisms. Existing Future Land Use Plan. MEASURABLE TARGET Ongoing coordination of development proposals by notifying affected agencies. (4.1) By 1990, direct future high density development to west of U.S. 1. (4.2) VIII-8 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON CA Cl z a a a a CURRENT CONDITION 0 p En o •. aa) 4-1rti A o �. 0 . a 0 U r' 0) w In en 'n ° a E DI a, O .-' 4-' .r a •� 0 c� 4.5 � ..° Ti4-4 Vn g BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) 0 0) a �'� . 9 ° a�i � •0 � W 0 Ana way .> •° 43 4) U zw a . '4 U r'' di a) g en o o cn a. A MEASURABLE TARGET o�t �a; 0� ^c'' ' 0 R. o 44,^ 9 �U v a g' •5 -' i t 0 s a (1) 0 0 0, v i o ik,' '4 v , ^ �14 o CA a� N•il '' �'r; 9 le ...„— ›. _...„ 10 ) is a) �v vs. 4 .ii I-. E, •FFi o s'' '0 a`) 6 o-it • 0� (3, g rr :6 U0) 0 03•~ 5' ° cV V. a) a) ao 15 a o .o t� o4 o•0'0 F.,' 2 ; li w •E ° N Monastery site has not been redeveloped. VIII-9 U U 64 Pi 6 Ei=1 6 ci:1 II 7:i v) y (1) 64 a N a a a6 a 6g N O .--( B -- V) E ,o.„'• gi''' .g � 2 N ( a) 4.' ci, wii) w , t' w , '' o 'csa �a 'tea 'ia �'8 ag ei, ..: cn c„ c„ LDR (Section 45.35.2, Village Code). Property within unincorporated area. No such requirement. V, , 8.,iA 1 VJ � •� .--1 0 ' O'i '�A. ONE ON M .�' :in 440NZ1 ae a)0 . a) q o I 0 a Iti 0 a) oho 0 0 00 0 a) 5 a) U v8 }� .--i 4! ;11 u) — vn 0 .--4 . •N 0) 0 0 a. y v 4 o 0 0 1-4 a Aft cn II 0 CD CD 03 1-4 14 c.0 a) 1-4 VIII-1 0 B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION GOAL: A safe, convenient and efficient motorized and non -motorized transportation system shall be available to all residents and visitors of the Village. AMENDMENT: The Traffic Circulation Element has been amended twice (Amendments 90-1 and 92-2) since the initial plan was completed. Detailed discussions of these amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are nine objectives, supported by 22 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Traffic Circulation Element was amended twice since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to incorporate interim level of service standards and then to incorporate permanent level of service standards. The alternative methodology used to derive permanent standards was allowed by the Florida Highway System Plan. In June, 1992, Palm Beach County enacted the "Coastal Residential Exception" to roadway level of service requirements, within certain municipal areas, in order to promote urban infill and deter urban sprawl. The entirety of the Village is within the area granted the exception. The effect of the exception. is to allow residential projects, as well as the residential portion of mixed use projects to receive a development order notwithstanding the County's standards. Commercial projects must still comply with County standards. Under the exception, an applicant must still submit a traffic study meeting the informational requirements of the countywide traffic performance standards ordinance; however, development ordersmay be issued, regardless of defined impacts. The exception does not, however, exempt residential projects from compliance with local level of service standards. The Florida Functional Classification System has been abolished and replaced by the Federal Functional Classification System. This system will be used to classify Village roadways in the future. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Traffic Circulation Element, as amended, has been effective in terms of guiding roadway improvements in the Village. Due to the lack of development, levels of service have not generally been an issue. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Traffic Circulation Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified. Current and projected roadway levels of service are presented in SECTION IV. All roadways are operating at an acceptable service level. Further, most improvements cited in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan have been implemented. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: The County' "Coastal Residential Exemption", coupled with adoption of permanent level of service standards by the Village have resulted in the following: (1) Existing roadways should be adequate to accommodate buildout of the Village; (2) roadway improvements identified in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which have not been completed to date may not be needed during the 1995 - 2005 period, based solely on traffic volume projections prepared in SECTION IV; and (3) alternatives (e.g. "Constrained Facility" designation) to widening S.R. A-1-A within the Village need not be pursued. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Traffic Circulation Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. The Traffic Circulation Element is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revised by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Traffic Circulation Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Traffic Circulation Element is consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. No inconsistencies are identified. However, the recent addition of F.A.C. 9J-5.019 requires the preparation of a Transportation Element for those municipalities within the designated urbanized area of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The Transportation Element, which will replace the Traffic Circulation Element, will be prepared at the time of the E.A.R. based amendments. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Traffic Circulation Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect VIII-1 2 current condi:tions and incorporate them within the required Transportation Element, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy Recommended Action/Wording 1 . 1 Revise to reflect permanent level of service standards per Amendment 92-2. 1.2 Delete since the policy is no longer necessary. 1.3 Delete since permanent standards are adopted. 1.4 No change. 1.5 Delete due to completion of required work. 2.1 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 2.2 Revise to reflect current requirements of the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. 2.3 Revise to reflect a new date. 3.1 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 3.2 No change. 4.1 Revise to reflect "as needed" basis. 4.2 Delete due to completed improvements. 4.3 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 5.1 No change. 5.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to coordinate traffic circulation plans. 6.1 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 7.1 No change. 7.2 No change. 7.3 Revise to change 8 years to "as conditions warrant". 8.1 No change. VIII-1 3 8.2 No change. 9.1 Revise to occur only when identified need exists. 9.2 No change. VIII-1 4 a) • O 0 z 0 .1 4--4 U a) 0 .1 • E • • N 0 -I cV a) a) Urban Collector a) E -44 O ortation Im in the 5-Year Tra a�5 5 • OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON (n v) cn (NI z v) CURRENT CONDITION t� 0 el M a) �A C� O a) cc o a y 02 A. . O › CD U� �§' R ain 0ri) 0C C x N 0 cri JD 00 t z N -4 O N a Pi P BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) I d' a N a N o a •� •3 z A � 0 • t H MEASURABLE TARGET Vs a; 1-1 1 5 . �•�°��wOaN 0 a' °• A �� (z, . r•+ _ 1 ' .o .ci 0 pr 2 43iv0 z4 D in ° ° `tl c i ° 00 y 1� *0 W OO 4sea -0 0 0• O •0 .R CZ 2a�� Zj �..4 : i w )Ei 0 84,9 n "" "- �0^ ¢� �wi5z O cn O 0 a D U V i -D ' t I 1/-1N O �., —E aww Designation not necessary to acceptable Level -of -Service. Policy should be deleted. VIII-1 5 0 0 iurisdiction of Palm Beach Co O O\ O\ 8 -I '4-4 1-i -I O • .S� d OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON N N z N N z va M N z - z CURRENT CONDITION d' d' M N O 1-4 C4 a) N a g 1-1 ON ON y U ollq O BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) d 'I" N 0 till a U 04 a ' g 0 z U U CP O j MEASURABLE TARGET 4O .�'i N rt CO ° D, N ~, CA � d w H o }O.� enO W � N 0�4a� E. g H i4 � A O\ o cn mi 04 � E Ca Er IL. CA al 4 CO a0 o N 0 N U O il N eti Ca � Ti ii z(19 5 E'o O• , cn U o a d) U v1 O • Eti 1-. N w N E as N to VIII-1 6 t 4 oa 0 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON En cn CURRENT CONDITION Adopted State Uniform Traffic Code (Sec. 316.945) Updated Land Development Regulations (Sec. 36.29.1) to consider bicycle paths. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) No parking prohibition Only sidewalks in Land Development Regulations. H By 1990 prohibit on -street parking on all arterial and collector roads. (3.1) During land development approval process, review for accommodation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. (3.2) PI Fi 1 vide a safe. convenient and efficient motorized and non -motorized E-+ OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON r z CURRENT CONDITION No Annual Reports Realignment and resurfacing of SR A1A and improvements to Burnt Bridge. Section 26-29, Village Code. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) No Annual Reports Existing conditions on SR A1A Existing Regulations MEASURABLE TARGET Village Public Safety Department will prepare annual Accident Frequency Reports. (4.1) By 1990, request the feasibility of improving SR A1A to mitigate dangerous areas and developing a bicycle path. (4.2) By FY 1990, update Land Development Regulations to require sidewalks along public roads. (4.3) Annual Reports are not necessary. Reports on an "as -needed" basis are made appropriate. Accident Report Data are computerized. VI VIII-1 7 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON cn in 0 co CURRENT CONDITION Annual review of Plan by Staff. Review by Public Services Dept. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Annual review of Plan by Staff. No review completed MEASURABLE TARGET Review updates of FDOT 5-Year Transportation Plan and coordinate with MPO to update or modify, as necessary. (5.1) By 1991, review neighboring jurisdiction Traffic Circulation Elements for consistency with Village Element. (5.2) OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON cn GI CURRENT CONDITION Updated definition of setback to protect designated ultimate rights -of - way. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Definition of setback in Zoning Code. MEASURABLE TARGET By 1990, Land Development Regulations shall preserve currently designated rights -of -way. (6.1) VIII-1 8 maintenance a) Continue curren adherence to F .fl ation and access to new deve • U O a) 0 0 U O E- OBJECTIVE ACIDEVED YES or NO/REASON _ J o a) a) CURRENT CONDITION Section 36.19, Village Code. Off-street parking lot layout, Construction and Maintenance Standards for Commercial Districts per Zoning Code. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Section 36.19, Village Code. Off-street parking lot layout, Construction and Maintenance Standards for Commercial Districts per Zoning Code. MEASURABLE TARGET Enforce Zoning and Subdivision Regulations to provide for safe convenient traffic flow. (8.1) Discourage excessive curb cuts, including the control of connections and access points to roadways by conforming to FDOT Design Standards. (8.2) VIII-1 9 idents of North Palm Beac 4-4 a) 122 0 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON oo En o z CURRENT CONDITION No Annual Request Tri-Rail Self -Supporting BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) No Annual Request Tri-Rail Self -Supporting MEASURABLE TARGET Annually request that CoTran (now Palm Tran) review bus schedules and stops. (9.1) Support of Tri-Rail on a self- supporting basis. (9.2) A more appropriate method is if a 0 0 H a 0 aq 0 0 U U o" 0 4.4 E o U y 'd 1,3 4.4 tg U coo a d 41) a.). a) .o 2 VIII-20 C. HOUSING GOAL: Ensure the provision of safe, decent and sanitary housing and living conditions in designated residential neighborhoods consistent with: (1) density levels indicated on the FUTURE LAND USE Maps Series; and (2) the current residential character of the Village and individual Planning Areas. Further, ensure that the character of new housing stock remains consistent with that currently in evidence while accommodating the needs of projected population levels. AMENDMENT: The Housing Element has been amended twice (Amendments 90-1 and 92-2) since the initial plan was completed. Detailed discussions of these amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are five objectives, supported by 20 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: Changes in condition have been minimal since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Building permit data (Ref: SECTION V) indicate that only 47 units have been built since 1989. However, Planned Unit Development Approval has been granted for all of the vacant land in Planning Area 6A. Buildout of these parcels, along with limited remaining infill potential, is projected to result in the complete development of the Village by the year 2000. A windshield survey, along with conversations with the Public Services Department, result in the conclusion that the housing stock of the Village is in standard condition, with no units identified as needing rehabilitation or demolition. There are 448 licensed rental apartments within the Village, within 22 complexes. A sample survey of rents indicates that most units are affordable to defined low income groups, based upon a 1995 median income (family of four) income in Palm Beach County of $48,000. Maximum affordable low income household gross rents, as determined by the Palm Beach County Commission on Affordable Housing, are as follows: 1 person - $673/mo.; 2 person - $768/mo.; 3 .- person - $864/mo.; 4 person - $960/mo.; and 5 person - $1,036/mo. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Housing Element, as amended, has been effective in terms of guiding housing policy within the Village, as several land development regulations have been adopted based thereon. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of -the Housing Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. VIII-21 MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified. Current and projected housing stock growth are presented in SECTION V. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: Planned Unit Development approvals for properties in Planning Area 6A have resulted in the preservation/mitigation of vegetative species identified in the FUTURE LAND USE element. No other problems or opportunities are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Housing Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. The Housing Element is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revised by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Housing Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Housing Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. F.A.C. 9J-5.010 contains some revised requirements since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which will be addressed during the preparation of the E.A.R. based amendments. A summary of the revised requirements is as follows: Section Required Action 9J-5.010 Revised purpose of the Housing Element. 9J-5.010(1) Revised requirement to include an affordable housing needs assessment. 9J-5.01 0 (2 ) 9J-5.010(3)(b) 9J-5.010(3) (c) Requirement for revised housing needs assessments and means for accomplishing supporting infrastructure. Revised objectives for creation and/or preservation of affordable housing and for adequate sites for housing types. Revised or new policy requirements for: (1) Specific actions/programs to streamline permitting; (2) establishingcriteria guiding the location of housing types; (3) establishing group home locations; (4) use of job training; (5) use of interlocal agreements in high value communities; and VIII-22A designating sufficient sites for housing. The revised requirements, as well as preparation and adoption of aappropriate Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be completed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Housing Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the required E.A.R. based amendments the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy 1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 -) 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 Recommended Action/Wording Revise to reflect the ongoing need land development regulations. Revise to reflect the ongoing need land development regulations. No change. to implement to implement Revise to reflect the ongoing need to land development regulations. No No No No change. change. change. change. implement Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations, as well as current conditions. No change. Revise to reflect a new date to land development regulations. 3.7 Revise to reflect the ongoing land development regulations. 3.8 Revise to reflect the ongoing land development regulations. 4.1 Revise to reflect the ongoing land development regulations. VIII-22B implement need to need to need to implement implement implement 4.5 5.1 5.2 No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. VIII-23 0 75+ k and reside E-4 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON cil cn G) a) CURRENT CONDITION Section 15, Village Code Section 15, Village Code BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990)- Section 15, Village Code Section 15, Village Code MEASURABLE TARGET By 1990, adopt Minimum Housing Regulations to implement Comprehensive Plan. (1.1) By 1990, adopt Admin. and Enforcement Procedures. (1.2) OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON N G) N ,-+ z CURRENT CONDITION Section 15, Village Code To be determined during Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Section 15, Village Code No locally significant structures designated. MEASURABLE TARGET By 1990, review and amend, if necessary, Housing Code criteria to conserve existing housing stock, guide rehab., and demo activities. (2.2) At the time of the EAR Update, consider the need to designate any local historically significant structures. (2.3) 4-1 VIII-24 0• Vct 0 .I ovided for the existi .0 .I 0 3-4 a) at at 1-4 0 U .S. • 0 U .001 0 cct 0 0 0 01 1 0 0 0 N tu tg .0 0 U _, 0 • 0 0 tD � o ri 140 .t OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON 11��US CA /1te�n,, 1�n, 110 Cl �_ z 0 a)›N CA CURRENT CONDITION a)' v) CI ,+ vs 0 O a�'i '� a�i �' w o o o ,o i. A A w1E1 O vs ba o �" TA a ~ Q c� v, N v' p, fn ti A +� tS ' O N ° . � O as bin .. •'O Q., 0 00 y O N ., ; o �U,�,.,U N,—, t,CD U;u cn I. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) at`S v, [� 1 a� ui vi ct:Io , O � + OOP a a, vi 'v. CS4. o'�i C4 Crbp o � .5 °• o N 'SU .moo > � MI A n g o O i N a . A M 0 -� o 0 CM • N `� a z rn ram, a i A '� U E ;P W t . Phi ' o to W MEASURABLE TARGET '� COMil r. �'' coa ri ;d > t cd �7 O O 4 � > 4. 0 8 4 ba co H a,' > � OS 5p 4 fli of N 0 o yM es 2� A"61 0 p tA o �i .b :� a� O aasITh xa�8 r .2 ° a' w O � 2 I '� �, ad o +s •- aow °b t5El g •" o'` os C °' = Ai w›, c .b a` 1.0 >► • �rj avaluen � R M , U A . U N '�r 0 0 o cA .s� O as0 an a Va 151 U o vo g 0 o >, 0 aaw Reschedule for implementation following E.A.R. based Amendments. VIII-25 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON Sections 45-27 and 45-32, Village Yes Code. CURRENT CONDITION BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) No provisions for said uses. Pcl By 1990, provide for the location of Daycare and Group Homes in the Village Land Development Regulations. (OBJ. 4) H a g A 0 0 2 0 N 'o bo 0 0 as 0 bo 0 0 O 0 0 o o VIII-26 D. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT GOAL: Existing and needed future public facilities shall be provided and maintained in a manner to: (1) provide consistent service levels throughout the Village; (2) protect public and private investments; (3) promote orderly, compact urban growth; and (4) assure the health, safety and welfare of Village residents. AMENDMENT: The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element has been amended twice (Amendments 90-1 and 92-2) since the initial plan was completed. Detailed discussions of these amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are seven objectives, supported by 23 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element was amended twice since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to incorporate changes required by the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between the Village and the State and to incorporate a more specific definition of "Urban Service Area", as well as the application of potable water and sewer level of service standards therein and within the area outside of the Urban Service Area. Both sanitary sewer and potable water service continue to be provided by Seacoast Utilities Authority (SUA); however, some significant changes in circumstances have occurred since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, including: 1. The Cabana Colony and Anchorage Drive wastewater treatment plants have been phased out. The Anchorage Drive Plant is on standby, in case of an emergency, and can be activated within 48 hours; 2. Most of the improvements and renovations defined as part of the Seacoast Utilities, Inc. purchase have been completed; and 3. SUA has recommended use of the following system -wide level -of -service standards: Sanitary Sewer - 107 gallons per capita per day (average daily flow); and Potable Water - 191 gallons per capita per day (average daily flow) and 258 gallons per capita per day (maximum daily flow). According to SUA, use of these standards by all jurisdictions within the service area will most accurately reflect system -wide use by all types of customers (i.e. residental and non-residential customers, as well as permanent and seasonal/tourist residents) and provide VIII-27 the basis for consistent long-range planning activities by and among the SUA member communities. Conditions related to the Solid Waste and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub -Elements have not changed substantially since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. The North County solid waste transfer station has opened recently, making packer truck trips more convenient. Also, the "zones of influence" for the Seacoast Utilities, Inc. wellfields have been redefined. At this time, only Zone 4 (permissive zone) encroaches upon the Village. The Drainage Sub -Element of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan included recommendations for the preparation of a Master Drainage Study, as well as a similar joint effort with the City of Palm Beach Gardens for the area known as the "Sandalwood Basin". A primary reason for completing these studies was to assist in quantifying non -point sources of pollution to Lake Worth, Intracoastal Waterway, Earman River and North Palm Beach Waterway. Since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, a joint, countywide permit application under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) has been prepared. Further work regarding the Village's Master Drainage Study has been delayed pending the outcome and requirements of the NPDES permit, as well as South Florida Water Management District's SWIMM program for the Intracoastal Waterway watershed. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element, as amended, has been generally effective. in terms of guiding infrastructure services and improvements in the Village. Due to the lack of development, levels of service have not generally been an issue. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies. were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified. Current and projected related public facilities levels of service are presented in SECTION V. All facilities are operating at acceptable service levels. Further, most improvements cited in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan have been implemented. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: The purchase and operation of the potable water and sanitary sewer system by SUA has provided each of the participating governments with VIII-28 the opportunity to expand and improve service to their constituents. Further, bond revenues from the purchase have been used to upgrade the systems. The NPDES and SWIMM programs have initiated efforts to identify and manage pollution from stormwater runoff, as well as other non -point sources; however, it is not clear at this point whether or not these programs, due to funding limitations, will be effective. Downstream municipalities such as North Palm Beach should not bear an inappropriate share of non -point source control program costs. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revised by Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. F.A.C. 9J-5.011 contains some revised requirements since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which will be addressed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. A summary of the revised requirements is as follows: Section Required Action 9J-5.011 9J-5.01 1 (1 ) Change in name of element: Drainage becomes "Stormwater Management". New requirements for soils analyses for areas served by septic tanks and assessment of recharge areas. 9J-5.011(2)(a) Prepare a goal statement for each facility type included in the Element. 9J-5.011(2)(b) Prepare at least one objective for each goal statement for each facility type included VIII-29 9J-5.011(2)(c) in the Element. Prepare at least one policy for each objective statement for each facility type included in the Element, addressing items 1. - 4. 9J-5.011(2)(c)(5) Establish water quality standards for stormwater discharge. The revised requirements, as well as preparation and adoption of appropriate Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be completed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of current Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the updated Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Element, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy Recommended Action/Wording 1.1 No change. 1.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 1.3 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 1.4 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 1.5 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 2.1 Update to reflect current deficiencies. 2.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need for a Capital Improvements Coordinating Committee. 2.3 No change. 3.1 Update to reflect current solid waste collection service policy. 3.2 Update to reflect current drainage policy. 4.1 No change. VIII-30 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.3 No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change except to delete wording related to establishing a capacity allocation system. 5.4 Delete wording related to mandatory annual sampling of individual potable water wells. 6.1 No change. 6.2 Revise to reflect ongoing need to implement land development regulations. 7.1 No change. 7.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 7.3 7.4 No change. No change. VIII-31 rocess that. as a • a) E 0 a) aa) •1 CU .t"i •1 tion of the C 0 CCS ted Level -of -Service Standards are available or • • • 0 ment order or 0 0 1-( 0 ••-c rocess for the determination of concurrenc O 174 •.U-� • 0 ment. The latest acts of develo a) 0 V2 2•� • u) c (3.) 0 • 'L3 • 4- lan for develo 474 ment order or • OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON to En v o CURRENT CONDITION o 0 Lr. ct � a 4 •3€+-+ �, ..., cr., (,) i.?, o o o .4...0 r A t a-0 NA (D.. o . 0 O • (1 i. o .r.., O BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) VI ti) d' A � r4 v� 4 •- z° 1., z a>i A a� as 0z .E 0) CD E a' `A 0 o z En w o� 0O �, 0 z MEASURABLE TARGET H� `n �v 0 cr •F a� ^ '" 0° En . 6 1 is, ,_., o. ^ , 1-, PIAD4•� o� o o •�� °•ter' ° �`��o,-, aa) O '� •v, .so o 4.' v o oA M A co AIILL y5 aU -4o a' it;ti 1111:'iI Ti., •,-, 0 4-4 ,-, .4.4 14 . 4.) ,...( ". Z•15 at i (...) ;-., �4-1 U o coG0 42 QA g fli VIII-32 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED I YES or NO/REASON C/� _ ---, z N vD N o o / at °' UO �„ sili3, al t E .0›ct cc q--9 z 0 0 _ �,>� , • 0.) a) �' x 8 q Ti rtl z V czi +, ' 60 o z •0 .0 al � cA .0 ctt o 0 2 BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) 0 a) t 43 2 0 Q. •o x 0 '--� o 8 ', °i a� L 0 z ba 0of .� o z 46' a) bo o • o z I .0 o 2 �� 0 g 0 ¢, z MEASURABLE TARGET �� `o �a)o� I20 � o���� N V. V'd› c� o til ^ Q+ CA ,� c w o a\ '8 G\ 'd ,� ^^, cD 04 '� ea '� o O,�O v�iN• w4� w•,6., 2 0 C 1 ui � g..o¢�, °; 0 • �� N b rn • A w �o �o� � �� w v 4 MI nd ad ct 0 P� a) .." i tie 4. c .1§ 4 5.4 w o -8A 8� o 0 o,czt t; o 9, g., ,5.- U a bQ E E 0 Ea) o .d 4-4 cD En • a >1 W 'o • A a) Eb.0 as 00 tt U E a) En O _ cu N • CU 0 49 V N VIII-33 VI a' C/2 a' CII a' E a) E 't� > a fa, - a' «3_ - •r, "0•al cat U as as 0 tn a) W g a' E a) o $�' a rzt a till a' A Eas o U z a) a' .E i ..�, �' 3 a' z 0 O :15 cV •� aI' O a' clu9 '0 a' .0 En a' - at — ., v� UGO a) 0 a' _ 1_, a' ai c' �"' 4 c' N la, ci � � > a' Q, tap i • ,-, a-�'5 U c o "° 4 i i va U cV .�� y, c� iJ, �+ t�" ' ''a a' IA o al Z ittap zs a a) 2 o :5 VIII-34 CURRENT CONDITION The same schedule as existed in 1989 Pick-up and transport service 1.)Maintain the current LOS I. 0 oA ib U 0ea o 0 Cet p 0 U Cg14 0 O o 0 o -co z d 0 03 4.4 g z No analysis completed Village newsletter Container placement regulations E a d� 8 +3 2 4G 0 U O . p . O • t"r C� U cy 3CM 3 4 .3 0CI g o is 0 3 (91 a) 7:1 U `�, C 'p'� C TsO O g 1 1 rec CA .2 ... p U 1 >, El .s u 3 O U .O b0 .. U-5 p U 45 ~ e 1 *8 *a 3.4, 1.4 A i ; 1 4 zz NUU Md> ter' g UP. ;' oo ,� VIII-35 z Routine Maintenance Program Adopted regulations Trash Removal Program Flood Protection Ord. Existing l_,DR's a 0 Existing LDR's No Master Drainage Study .� °� •d o 0 c� .= 3 0 0 .� r, o ci. �a .° �° �w wad 3 ty AE �, ar W a. y., U) fi ^▪ ^°� d 0 0 , aoi hi a� o "n O 2 "a iii V 2 5 8 A.r o 8 3 0 ,,,_, 0 R = be tt = = 2 ea) U2 4' v p per ri ... ���., 5 o ^- a 2 C a)�. VIII-36 • A 3 rt o Ca gr4 zA a) o .2 Cr ,1-4 e o cA A o z U2 A z a A 0 _ 2 i. O z .6 2 -6' A ba A w z 0 rr,� g .. cis g U =r , o. = ch ,,,, a cr, , .... a V 4 U meL, to = �8a �A -0 -I i� p.b W/ QCO vg 1 i ,.., ;1,1 rn g oo8 Ta .14 LI 0 ibi �U VIII-37 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YRS or NO/RF.ASON 4a a a CURRENT CONDITION :� 4 E o ri G6 0 a -`is 4 -. l., ,o c o -0 -6; , E 0 i -- 4i, o BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Maintain liaison with Solid Waste Solid Waste Authority Public Authority to insure Village input to Information Programs selection and management of landfill sites or other solid waste disposal lilts. (4.1) Annually, evaluate the Village's Annual Budget Review Process Resource Recovery Program to determine if expansion is feasible. (4.2) The Solid Waste Authority shall be Solid Waste Authority Legislation, responsible for financing transfer Financing, Mechanisms, and stations and disposal facilities. (4.4) Construction Programs MEASURABLE TARGET VIII-38 • DC r-+ 5 0 4-i a) v cn 1.4 U CSS 5 z a v .3 2 0 4-1 0 0 o a) 0 � 0 O = 0 eta � cn O o a. ed V) 0 1n • v U 4 ttl 0 'd OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON r, CURRENT CONDITION 5 E 0 0 C 2 a,... 2 ate' 2 0 0 .= g o U 0 A o � a Z s,, -00 BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) CA CA 12 A o 0 $, Aal 0 0 0b E O =. 0 o -� z z a MEASURABLE TARGET ce o .„4:2, 46. Cc) .5 8 i .2 :a > 0 2 B I i..i P Qi .�� V �•+ ..� �� 4a --o a .0 r i. U a) .._, ..� ...�,, _^ ,= to ON 0.6 cn 02��c o0 �• ,1 3-cis ai �; it et1 �i 0 3 0 % n au a)o ba aA .~ aa. ia,S =3,a•74 i t) _CI =,0 uul.1Fi� 4'4i� -a off.-•v8 VIII-39 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/RF,ASON I i ))� ti ti i CURRENT CONDITION Requirements included within LDR's Construction site BMP's included within LDR's BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Limit post -development runoff rates Requirements not included within consistent with Chapter 40-E, F.A.C. Village LDR's and preserve existing natural drainage features. (6.1) By FY 1991, include construction site Construction site BMP's not included Best Management Practices (BMP's) within LDR's within LDR's. (6.2) MEASURABLE TARGET VIII-40 ct3 0 0 5 0 4.4 46) N CURRENT CONDITION OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YF.S nr NO/REASON i c �v i a v v O U 130 = 0 .,UO.,. •!:'• a . cn .co L.)... oa a..3:=.-:, s, u 0 H BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) The Village shall implement and Existing Village Code enforce appropriate water shortage provisions established by Chapt. 40 E-21, F.A.C. (7.1) By FY 1990, xeriscape landscape No xeriscape requirements practices shall be incorporated within Village LDR's. (7.2) Require the use of low volume Village Plumbing Code fixtures. (7.3) As a means of conserving potable Use of surface waters for irrigation of water, the Village shall continue to public areas use surface water from the C-18 Canal to irrigate parks, municipal areas, median strips, and the country club. (7.4) MEASURABLE TARGET VIII-41 E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOAL: Protect, conserve and enhance coastal resources while providing for water -dependent land uses in a manner consistent with the general health, safety and welfare of Village residents and visitors. AMENDMENT: The Coastal Management Element has been amended once (Amendment 90-1) since the initial plan was completed. A discussion of the amendment is presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are seven objectives, supported by 20 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Coastal Management Element was amended once since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to address the FDCA Stipulated Settlement Agreement. Three issues, regarding changes in condition, need to be discussed: 1. Master Drainage Study: The 1989 Comprehensive Plan called for the completion of a Master Drainage Study by Fiscal Year 1992. The purpose of the Study was twofold: (1) To verify interim drainage level -of -service standards or establish alternative standards; and (2) address the issue of implementing stormwater quality Best Management Practices (BMPs), provided that upstream pollutant loads in the C-17 Canal basin are established by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The Village has deferred work on the Master Drainage Study pending receipt of conditions and requirements of the NPDES permit program, as well as completion of the SWIM program for the Intracoastal Waterway watershed and the quantification of pollutant loading reductions, per the State Water Policy, by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2. Lake Worth Environmental Studies: Several policies in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan were dependent upon the completion of the Lake Worth environmental studies, including related management and controls strategies. Two studies have been completed; however, each was essentially an inventory, as opposed to proposing management solutions to defined environmental problems. Inventory data should be incorporated into the updated Village Support Documentation for the E.A.R. based amendments. The only management recommendation pertinent to the Village generated by the environmental studies was the restoration project recommended for Big Munyon Island (Planning Area 1). This program, consisting of spoil removal, improvement of tidal channels, exotic vegetation removal, mangrove planting and VIII-42 construction of a boardwalk, is currently being implemented. 3. John D. MacArthur Beach Master Plan: Most of the environmental policies in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, as they relate to Planning Area 1, are being implemented by the. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) through the completion of the Master Plan. An updated status, as well as a summary of future improvements and programs should be included in the E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan amendments. Further, land development regulations and development activities in Planning Area 1 should be coordinated with the Master Plan. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Coastal Management Element, as amended, has been generally effective in terms o.f guiding Village actions. However, to be completely effective, the Village has to rely upon the programs of other levels of government (e.g. SFWMD and FDEP) either for direction and/or management assistance. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Coastal Management Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified; however, additional environmental programs will require the assistance of other governmental agencies, as discussed above. Most actions cited in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, over which the Village has complete control, have been implemented. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: The NPDES permit program may have provided the impetus for addressing, in a comprehensive manner, the stormwater management and pollution control issue. However, due to the technical requirements of adequately addressing these issues, it may require a number of years, or longer, to develop and implement an adequate management system. Further, related costs have not begun to be addressed at this point. Although it may take a long time to adequately address these issues, the coordination of the NPDES program with those of the SFWMD and FDEP appears to present opportunities for success. The Lake Worth environmental studies provided the basis for implementing the environmental restoration program for Big Munyon Island. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Coastal Management Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. VIII-43 The Coastal Management Element_ is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan( as revised by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 199 i,::, CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Coastal Management Element_ is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are Identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Coastal Management Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. F.A.C. 9J-5.012 contains some revised requirements since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which will be addressed during the preparation of E$A.R. based amendments. A summary of the revised requirements is as follows: Section Required Action 9J-5.012(2) 9J-5.012(3) New inventories and/or analyses of land uses, public access, public facilities, including capacity analyses. Revised policy requirements for post disaster redevelopment, infrastructure within the Coastal High Hazard Area, shoreline development consistent with the County Marina Siting Plan. 9J-5.012(4) Revised requirement to incorporate County Marina Siting Plan. 9J-5.012(5) Does not apply to North Palm Beach. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Coastal Management Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the updated Coastal Management Element, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy 1.1 Recommended Action/Wording Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 1.2 No change. 1.3 Revise to reflect existing County regulations. 1.4 No change. VIII-44 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 2.1 ‘) 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 4.1 4.2 4.3 Delete due to implementation of policy. Revise to reflect the status of the NPDES permit program, SWIM program and State Water Policy. Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. Revise to reflect the results of any future studies or programs. Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. Revise to require consistency with the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park Master Plan. Revise to require consistency with the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park Master Plan. Revise to require consistency with the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park Master Plan. 4.4 Revise to require consistency with the John D. MacArthur Beach State Park Master Plan. Change date to complete inventory, if required. No change. No change. Delete policy due to lack of authority on the part of the Village to utilize the data for any constructive use. No change. 6.3 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. VIII-45 ELEMENT: COASTAL MANAGEMENT historical sites sources. includin wetlands, marine habitats and c Maintain or im OBJECTIVE: OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED VIS or NO/RFAsfN i v 1 ni a a CURRENT CONDITION 0 jJ a0 A t ID v v 0 lg i-; O �� N Q .�' 0 �d/ v E. . ,n BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Prohibit development in the Coastal No related requirements Area that will adversely impact existing marine habitats and resources by implementing Special Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. (1.1) All planned improvements to J,D. No related review MacArthur Beach State Park shall be reviewed for consistency with the Village Goal Stateinent and Objectives 4, 6, and 7 of the Coastal Management Element. (1.2) Upon Notification of the State, adopt No ordinance by ordinance, manatee protection area regs., including signage. (1,3) Historic sites in the Coastal Area No related requirements shall be protected by implementing Policy 1.1 of the Future Land Ilse Element. (1.4) MEASURABLE TARGET VIII-46 e estuarine envi N a) 0 o .--- CURRENT CONDITION Surface water discharge eliminated No Master Drainage Study Requirement included in LDR's b 0 oa x 3 vi ra -a. „iglit e'D Az ao 1§Ax1 44 16daze c g Ts Oil l 0`�in 0 d U r No Master Drainage Study No Requirements in LDR's No Marina Siting Ordinance No Lake Worth Environmental Study 3`* 0 1.4 0t on CZ -4 O O py O\ rlbo t co led cvi DO a, °' 0 .Q $ CCi ••'+ .r t� �i v ...d R ' cs lit a a al li-3 =1 I v ..- 8 c4 ,,,,s. N. re:, §--5 .g. t 1 O g "' a 4.)N i�r 'S I-. t) 0 g — t — 0 ., a w A i g. 1 0> -8 - 13 as U es 0 in 0 a) 0 • a) s.. z ett do 0 b a) v • a, 4) fi W..-- SO a� Ts as .cs El w a� 0 3� • 2 ag o • Th a, 8 VIII-47 U 44 ndent recreational cts a) OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON y CURRENT CONDITION Requirement per LDR's BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION 0990) Through implementation of the Requirement per LDR's Village LDR's, require the provision of public access to the North Palm Beach Waterway at intervals of 1,000 feet. (3.1) MEASURABLE TARGET cn OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON v, N z CURRENT CONDITION A• a c o 0 o CI al a -0 U oa .o 0 p� Z. w2 • BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) 1a 0 p cr 0 rn fat 0 °� an o v 0 P� z w MEASURABLE TARGET is:Ea ) 'r -8 �,, a� = .s 'v, U .-. Cr VI' v ...0 g .cm 6. 0- Ca zt, ,p, as .� .0 O &u19fl go re 0- co cin 'IV, .V r v, U O VIM-48 m v2 vn x Om 4) Uet �a — A x a U CI CI 0 (n — A x a UC a,a 0 N $ A Erosion control measures shall be No guidelines or rules limited to those that do not interfere with normal littoral processes, sea turtle nesting or negatively impact coastal natural resources. (4.2) By FY 1990, implement rules' to No guidelines or rules allow only native dune vegetation to be used in landscaping dune systems in Planning Area 1. (4.3) Beach & dune alteration and No guidelines or rules construction shall be prohibited in Planning Area 1 unless it provides necessary access to coastal resources, abates erosion and does not significantly impact water quality or habitat value. (4.4) VIII-49 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON 1 I a i CURRENT CONDITION U at U IS 8 0 V] 0 o �7 130 U = 10a 041 w �O• aC.),, eCI BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) By FY 1992, the Village shall No inventory of special needs identify through notice in the residents. newsletter or utility bills, residents who need special assistance during emergency evacuation, and notify Civil & Emergency Mgt. Agencies of same. (5.1) Provide, through the Public Safety Continuous radio contract available Dept., constant input to the Emergency Mgt. Center regarding road conditions and the status of evacuation activities. (5.2) Urban development in Planning Area "C/OS" Future Land Use Category 1 shall be discouraged by applied to lands in Planning Area 1 implementing the "C/OS" Land Use Designation.(5.3) MEASURABLE TARGET VIII-50 z 0 z 0 cn ms I'J t sh) 4:19 1 a Sgo cn 0 . 0 O .w 0 o SE ia.� o.? 4 `''a7 z v w c -° - � o a Ein6. cr 4.4 z No such designation ea o tea, wir No strategy or program VIII-51 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON cn > 1 CURRENT CONDITION No additional needs defined in the Recreation Assessment Report (3/13/95). BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) By FY 1993, complete a Needs No Needs Assessment Assessment of Water -Dependent and Water -Related uses in the Coastal Area in conjunction with the analyses and recommendations established in Objective 1, Recreation and Open Space Element. (7.1) MEASURABLE TARGET VIII-52 F. CONSERVATION GOAL: Protect, conserve and enhance natural resources including vegetative communities, fish and wildlife habitats and species of special concern. AMENDMENT: The Conservation Element has been amended twice (Amendments 92-1 and 92-2) since the initial plan was completed. A discussion of the amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are five objectives, supported by 15 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Conservation Element was amended twice since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. First, (Amendment 92-1) to address the issue of Manatee protection and second (Amendment 92-2) to correct scrivener errors. Three issues, regarding changes in condition, need to be discussed: 1. Master Drainage Study: The 1989 Comprehensive Plan called for the completion of a Master Drainage Study by Fiscal Year 1992. The purpose of the Study was twofold: (1) To verify interim drainage level -of -service standards or establish alternative standards; and (2) address the issue of implementing stormwater quality Best Management Practices (BMPs), provided that upstream pollutant loads in the C-17 Canal basin are established by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD } . The Village has deferred work on the Master Drainage Study pending receipt of conditions and requirements of the NPDES permit program, as well as completion of the SWIM program for the Intracoastal Waterway watershed and the quantification of pollutant loading reductions, per the State Water Policy, by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2. Lake Worth Environmental Studies: Several policies in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan were dependent upon the completion of the Lake Worth environmental studies, including related management and controls strategies. Two studies have been completed; however, each was essentially an inventory, as opposed to proposing management solutions to defined environmental problems. Inventory data, including those which address manatee populations in Village waters, should be incorporated into the updated Village Support Documentation for the E.A.R. based amendments. The only management recommendation pertinent to the Village generated by the environmental studies was the restoration project recommended for Big Munyon Island (Planning Area 1). VIII-53 "1 This program, consisting of spoil removal, improvement of tidal channels, exotic vegetation removal, mangrove planting and construction of a boardwalk, is currently being implemented. Further, the County is presently working on a Manatee Protection Ordinance. When completed, the Ordinance, along with any local government management or enforcement responsibilities, should be incorporated within the Comprehensive Plan. 3. John D. MacArthur Beach Master Plan: Most of the environmental policies in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, as they relate to Planning Area 1, are being implemented by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) through the completion of the Master Plan. An updated status, as well as a summary of future improvements and programs should be included in the E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan amendments. Further, land development regulations and development activities in Planning Area 1 should be coordinated with the Master Plan. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Conservation Element, as amended, has been generally effective in terms of guiding Village actions. However, to be completely effective, the Village has to rely upon the programs of other levels of government (e.g. SFWMD, FDEP and Palm Beach County) either for direction and/or management assistance. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Conservation Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified; however, additional environmental programs will require the assistance of other governmental agencies, as discussed above. Most actions cited in the 1989 Comprehensive Plan, over which the Village has complete control, have been implemented. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: The NPDES permit program may have provided the impetus for addressing, in a comprehensive manner, the stormwater pollution control issue. However, due to the technical requirements of adequately addressing these issues, it may require a number of years, or longer, to develop and implement an adequate management system. Further, related costs have not begun to be addressed at this point. Although it may take a long time to adequately address these issues, the coordination of the NPDES program with those of the SFWMD and FDEP appears to present opportunities for success. The Lake Worth environmental studies provided the basis for implementing the environmental restoration program for Big Munyon Island. VIII-54 Palm Beach County has taken the lead in developing a Manatee Protection Ordinance. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE. STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Conservation Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. The Conservation Element is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revised by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Conservation Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Conservation Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. F.A.C. 9J-5.013 contains some revised requirements since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which will be addressed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. A summary of the revised requirements is as follows: Section Required Action 9J-5.01 3 (1 ) Revised requirements to identify and analyze groundwaters, fish and shellfish communities and hazardous waste pollutants for each resource. 9J-5.013(2)(b) Revised objective to protect waters that flow into estuarine or oceanic waters. 9J-5.013(2)(c) Revised policy to protect water quality and quantity from adverse land uses. 9J-5.013(2)(c) 'New policy to protect natural resources from hazardous wastes. 9J-5.013(3) New policies to protect and conserve wetlands. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Conservation Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the updated Conservation Element, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: VIII-55 Policy Recommended Action/Wording 1.1 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to adopted land development regulations. 1.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to adopted land development regulations. 1.3 No change. implement implement 1.4 Revise to occur only when identified need exists. 1.5 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 2.1 Revise to reflect implementation upon completion of NPDES permit and implementation of related SFWMD programs. 2.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 2.3. Revise to reflect implementation upon completion of NPDES permit and implementation of related SFWMD programs. 3.1 Revise to reflect the ongoing Water Shortage regulations. 3.2 Revise to reflect the current period. nature of Emergency short-range planning 4.1 Delete Lakeside Park program due to completion. Revise to reflect assistance from SFWMD for C- 17 Canal program. 4.2 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 4.3 5.1 No change. Delete. 5.2 Revise to incorporate provisions of County's Manatee Protection Ordinance, when completed. VIII-56 \� ELEMENT: CONSERVATION ai within the Villa • • as 0 CURRENT CONDITION I OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YRS nr NO/RF.ASAN '›-1 0 g O i 0 U F0 �W 0 tb a 0 rn cu cli A a � 1 = co o C.)'a et VD .0 0 0...- .� rn U 0 1 111 4O us 11. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) MEASURABLE TARGET particulate emissions. (1.1) Commencing FY 1990, open burning of land clearing debris shall be prohibited without a County permit. (1.2) Support efforts to reduce auto emissions pollution by such programs as car pooling, public transportation, and use of flex -time. (1.3) 1 Policy not measurable. VIII-57 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED I YES or NO/REASON i N O z ›" V1 z CURRENT CONDITION N .6, a M� a co c' — 0 co 0 1 BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) 0.2 .6,, VI Ut GA CI as z 0 c as z 0 0 0 z MEASURABLE TARGET .,;:a �, .,O fr... = bA =,aa 4 g. 1 v, �+ • i v.a /M �, 3 �, N .5. 5 -.45.a � � O.� .. a u. �'o c,-, a�A,� o N �.. ,., U 2.- g O CI • N U v .t �' 3 i v, co .c a3 0ca3a� y�.�� z ..... ..... 0-o ate, U a2 cl O O - `i o *0 6 5 01 � i .E 8 .--� vi V n 3 .,. iHU 1 aa.t.' 11 VIII-58 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON e x at a a) es iU ct — m 0z 0 ° CURRENT CONDITION g ci3 �� e U 0 0 a Z o ^i a) 44 a C..)0 A 0 CI i. a) M M o 8 0 H 0 as 5 p4 BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) ato �i o i, c 0 o •o 5 �' A '� . 5 ,� 5 0 o g '" z 5 tb 0 • E E. 0 cd > o 0A x 1-4 1 MEASURABLE TARGET o .6 on [� .. et, V 'U 44' � 0\ tU, ti cl N o ° �+ ¢,a�a� 6 a' '1g 4g C O 8 �. • ., ai ctS • c c. <0 A�6 °b ° 0 +.0 O 0' ++ O? H • to r�..sa,U 0 s,-0 ¢,cs U ++ fi T. a) 13 y C.) fa. PL, 4 Need assistance from the South Florida Water Management District. VIII-59 rotect fish and wildlife a U ti OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON i i- z N O z CURRENT CONDITION ca 2 zz 0 0 0 CZ 0 • . ct c. .2; 0Woa it = Q Ca 0 0 aU W C 4. o 0 o r BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF . ADOPTION (1990) By FY 1990, expand Chapter 5, Unclear definitions of intent and Article IV, Section 5-101 of the jurisdiction - Village Code (Marine Sanctuary) to more specifically define the intent and jurisdictional applications of the Ordinance. (5.1) By FY 1994, determine the historical No historical evidence existence of manatees in Village waters. Pending the results, meet with County & Federal Agencies to determine if additional protective measures are required. If so, incorporate measures within Comprehensive Plan. (5.2) MEASURABLE TARGET Ordinance has no enforcement basis. 2 0 y 3 0 i 0 c� a�b c., 0 w .0 04 .mod o o by CS 0 W • °? . 0 . ▪ E o U 0 o a VIII-60 rotect fish and wildlife an ett a� U CURRENT CONDITION I OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or Nn/RPAS(1N i • h i d• N O O z z o 00 . -~ ='-..4', 1. 0 -^1 Id 8 c.i a0i 4. o cal fl O 7�• =-al0ace-=„ BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF - ADOPTION (1990) By FY 1990, expand Chapter 5, Unclear definitions of intent and Article IV, Section 5-101 of the jurisdiction - Village Code (Marine Sanctuary) to more specifically define the intent and jurisdictional applications of the Ordinance. (5.1) By FY 1994, determine the historical No historical evidence existence of manatees in Village waters. Pending the results, meet with County & Federal Agencies to determine if additional protective measures are required. If so, incorporate measures within Comprehensive Plan. (5.2) MEASURABLE TARGET 4.1 Ordinance has no enforcement basis. VIII-60 G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE GOAL: Ensure that the existing and future recreation and open space facilities and programs are maintained and improved in order to meet current and projected needs of Village residents. AMENDMENT: The Recreation and Open Space Element has amended since the initial plan was completed. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are seven objectives, by 13 policies in this Element. not been supported CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Recreation and Open Space Element has not been amended since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Further, with the exception of minor improvements within Village parks, recreation facilities are similar to those which existed at the time of adoption. The application of recreation and open space level of service standards indicates that existing park acreage should meet resident needs through buildout of the Village. However, in order to develop an integrated parks and recreation system, oriented to meeting resident needs, a resident survey and master plan were completed, pursuant to policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan. Findings of the Master Plan, as well as a program to implement its results should be incorporated within the E.A.R. based Comprehensive Plan amendments. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Recreation and Open Space Element has been effective in terms of guiding Village actions. Both the resident survey and Master Plan have been completed. Further, per Policy 7.1, an agreement with Benjamin School for the shared use of athletic fields has been implemented and, per Policy 3.3, a 3.8 acre park site has been delineated in Planning Area 6A. Due to the lack of development and relatively low remaining development potential, levels of service have not generally been an issue. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Recreation and Open Space Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT:. No major problems of development are identified. Current and projected recreation and open space levels of service are presented in SECTION V. VIII-61 UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: No unforeseen problems and/or opportunities are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Recreation and Open Space Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. There have been no changes to the Regional Policy Plan since the time of adoption. The Recreation and Open Space Element is therefore concluded to remain consistent therewith. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Recreation and Open Space Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Recreation and Open Space Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. No inconsistencies are identified. However, a statement regarding the lack of freshwater beaches' and shores in the Village should be included to meet the requirements of F.A.C. 9J-5.014(1) and 9J-5 .014(3) (b) (1 ). RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Recreation and Open Space Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the required Recreation and Open Space Element update, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy Recommended Action/Wording 1.1 Delete due to policy being implemented by Recreation Assessment Report. 2.1 No change. 3.1 Revise to reflect implementation of Recreation Assessment Report. 3.2 Same revision as policy 3.1. 3.3 No change. 4.1 No change. 4.2 No change. 5.1 Revise to reflect the continuing nature and use of level -of -service standards. VIII-62 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. Delete due to policy being implemented by Recreation Survey Report. Revise to reflect the need to maintain the agreement for joint use of facilities. 7.2 No change. 7.3 Revise to more appropriately address the issue of public access. VIII-63 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT: a) U ivalent to teat which is current a) acilities shall be main • U 8 0 0 No 0 CURRENT CONDITION Annual Program and Budget 'CS U w ra a lg VIII-64 m for facilities. a.) E OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON - - z z CURRENT CONDITION Recreation Assessment Report completed Recreation Assessment Report completed Existing LDR's BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (199 ) No Capital Program No long-range Program Existing LDR's MEASURABLE TARGET During FY 1991, initiate a 5-Year Capital Improvement Program based upon the results of the Master Development Plan. (3.1) Institute a long-range Recreation Improvement Program for Land & Facilities to accommodate the needs and desires of the projected ultimate population. (3.2) Continue to require site dedications for recreational purposes, per subdivision regulations. (3.3) a.) a) U a) i-� O 5 O u, a) 5 a) 04 U o" 0 a) a) O U42, cts rO+ �i O a) i.r VIII-65 rrent and future rocedure as a means of meetin O O U an annual basis U 0 2 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON til V) CO 0 CURRENT CONDITION Recreation Advisory Committee Recreation Advisory Committee BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) Recreation Advisory Committee Recreation Advisory Committee MEASURABLE TARGET Continue to expand Cultural Programs to include all ages. (4.1) Continue to plan expansion of all programs to satisfy population increases with the aid . and Advisement of Citizen Advisory Boards. (4.2) VIII-66 :a cn U or recreation facilities and o 0 O 0 ace areas and 0 ecreation facilities a 3-4 c40. • z 0 z 0 Completed Survey O as 2 c� 0 • c� 0 a., 0 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON 6 o CURRENT CONDITION 0 5 CI P)4 : ux w o 0 o O 0 � a w 0 ; u, 00 C �a E cn w BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) O 0 cz z 0 0 A .. g a bida w 0 cn 0 0 A -00 et bO w MEASURABLE TARGET O.s ; 0 O 0 •""a t1'S a' .8 8 —1 o g .g Wpq �" N g . g 0 0 -- .6 '' 1 o c 0 . ,�, W'vtg� A tit. cn i.+ 3 ., v� O 2 .0 •-• 1 00-+ g by 0 O O 1,-; iso 8.- 8 4-ict e.g... o = 7:$ 1:i ..... p, >' 4 4. i 1'er.7,10- VIII-68 H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION GOAL: Maintain and initiate, where necessary, an efficient and effective network of intergovernmental coordination mechanisms oriented to addressing issues and needs necessary to implement the goals and objectives of the North Palm Beach Comprehensive Plan. Further, intergovernmental coordination shall be oriented to maintaining the current character of the Village, while addressing issues and needs necessary to maintain adopted Level -Of Service (LOS) Standards. AMENDMENT: The Intergovernmental Coordination Element has been amended three times (Amendments 90-1, 92-1 and 92-2) since the initial plan was completed. Detailed discussions of these amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are four objectives, supported by 21 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Intergovernmental Coordination Element was amended three times since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to: (1) Work toward the implementation of a countywide fair share housing program; (2) participate in the development and implementation of a Lake Worth Management Plan; and (3) jointly identify, with Palm Beach Gardens, contributing impacts upon Burns Road and RCA Boulevard and define future improvements and responsibilities. In addition to the above amendments, the following is a summary of changes in conditions which have affected the implementation of objectives and policies of the Element: 1. The Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council has been abolished, therefore affecting the implementation of several policies. 2. Development and implementation of a "fair -share" program to address countywide low and moderate income housing needs was based upon the assumption that the County would assume the lead role. The County has not pursued this program to date. Therefore, the Village has not participated in the development of such a program. 3. A program for toxic waste separation and collection has not been pursued due to the potential associated liabilities. The program is best implemented by the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority. 4. State Road A-1-A does not need to be designated a "constrained facility" based upon the application of Village level -of -service standards to current and projected traffic counts. VIII-69 5. Prosperity Farms Road does not require additional improvements, based upon the application of Village level -of -service standards to current and projected traffic counts. Therefore, additional traffic distribution studies to analyze the effects of recent road improvements are not necessary. 6. The Village is in the process of obtaining an NPDES stormwater discharge permit. Until such time that the permit is obtained, all drainage studies and plans, as well as stormwater pollution assessments and management plans have been deferred. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Intergovernmental Coordination Element, as amended, has been generally effective in terms of guiding Village actions. Objectives and policies that have not been effectively implemented are primarily the result of changes in conditions discussed above. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives dnd policies of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified. Changes in conditions affecting the implementation of objectives and policies are discussed above. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: The implementation of the NPDES permit program will provide the basis to address stormwater quantity and quality issues on a comprehensive basis for the first time. The program, oriented to obtaining permits for all Palm Beach County municipal governments, as well as the County and selected service providers, establish the basis for a management program, as well as collect additional data needed to better define pollution sources. Upon completion, the program will provide direction for municipal stormwater management efforts. The perceived effort to develop a Lake Worth Management Plan seems to have stalled with the completion of the environmental studies. The NPDES permit program can provide some impetus for regenerating the program, as can the SFWMD'S SWIM Plan for the Intracoastal Watershed, if it is funded. Some of the roadway improvements issues (e.g. Prosperity Farms Road,U.S. Highway 1, north of the Parker Bridge and S.R. A-1-A) have diminished since the Village adopted its permanent level -of -service standards and applied them to currentand projected traffic counts. VIII-70 '1 CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Intergovernmental Coordination Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. Noinconsistencies are identified. The Intergovernmantal Coordination Element is concluded to remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revised by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Intergovernmental Coordination Element is consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Intergovernmental Coordination Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. No inconsistencies are identified. Recent amendments have been deleted by the Florida Legislature; therefore, no additional analysis of consistency is presented in this E.A.R. RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Intergovernmantal Coordination Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the updated Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Recommended Action/Wording No change. Revise by deleting reference to Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council. No change. Delete due to abolition of Countywide Planning Council. Revise to reflect current direction being provided by Palm Beach County. 1.6 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. 1.7 Delete due to excessive potential liability for the Village. Solid Waste Authority program. 1.8 Revise to reflect continuing arrangement. 1.9 No change. VIII-71 1.10 Delete due to approval of development orders along Prosperity Farms Road. 2.1 Delete due to implementation. 2.2 Revise to reflect continuing need for coordination. 3.1 Revise to reflect potential future designation should conditions so dictate. 3.2 Delete. No longer necessary, based upon current conditions. 3.3 Delete due to completion of task. 3.4 Revise to reflect new target date. 3.5 Revise to be completed after receipt of NPDES permit. 4.1 4.2 No change. No change. 4.3 Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement adopted land development regulations. D 4.4 Delete due to implementation of item (1) and P inappropriate nature of item (2). VIII-72 Board and curr UCn 0 U a) PI a) alities, Palm Beach Co with adiacent muni OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON z CURRENT CONDITION rn 0 1-, a, °" o A i-, a) 0" g — (, a) o a' U g 'cs ..-, °' ° �� a 0 s, • U a 8 0 Z , 0 0 ? o � 0 a' 0 is W BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) a) V 0 Q s�, R., o rCS A E .r o 0 al o U a .-, o �U r ) a 0 a o o z 5 g °� C j 0) 0 Si 5U �ax o g,� )0) U a) ;;.,o W MEASURABLE TARGET 3-0 U s�N a�>i 4 '-. Li.), 0 r-, . 3 0 o 1 D g n °' U r--� ,--� '5oN bA a) O a) -13 0 U bo to , 0 `n -ci o i 0 -0 at) zKgA CU,) 70 0o= 7,_;o22 0 O ?Q Q, pi3O M o r., , 0 a) 0 N 0 0 U el) 3 0 5 1'3 5 z-ig o.0''_ d' 1 U a) U •+ �° 74 p., 01 b.()•p � o 75 a) pa moo .-gcEna mac X O) .5 0 0 Q., 0..as, .-' l' cl , ° «3 Countywide Planning Council has been abolished. VIII-73 N m ti Cr) VI z ›-Iz �' z° No "Fair -Share" Program Updated Section 45-2, Vill 0 z No "Fair -Share" Program No permissive language in code E o g o o z s 0 z Lake Worth studies not completed �g.420 �� ogas ��1. ,4 O a) a) E '8 E .O 44 aa) 8 4° -0 ,9 -z 0 v '� `�czt -o to a4i a o 0 . Q 0 O a, 4•-4 Q ap r, _ �, 0 00 cu at ..Q O "" Q `. ,� ri Qa rs 6-4 a3 a, a Q, 0 0 a, ,›, O �' c� :� v, 52 a0as CZ :&) : N 3 v 00 O H Ti O O Q �'i � O\ .g w maw �' 4., �a w a ; t f.1). ��' 0.4 tita. o a CB 0.4 N La ct si O CA ig 2 0 0 2: o a 0 •o ,4 t4r3 g O U 5 aaz M t- VIII-74 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON co CURRENT CONDITION Mutually agreed upon Future Annexation Area Maps Adopted Future Land Use Plans in areas bordering Planning Areas 1 and 7 with compatible uses. BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) No mutually agreed upon Future Annexation Area Maps. Potentially conflicting Future Land Use Designations MEASURABLE TARGET By FY 1990, participate with adjacent municipalities to identify mutually acceptable annexation areas. (2.1) Participate with Palm Beach Gardens and Riviera Beach to protect existing uses in the Village from adverse impacts of development in neighboring jurisdictions. (2.2) VIII-75 - .ry U a) a) .r' CD • O overnments and current s s consistent with those of ad Establish Level -of -Service S a) • U 8 a) U N N diP OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON v Z h z `O z CURRENT CONDITION es •- g a� 0 A U 0 •° 1 ct 0 Z 'v� g '9 ta .E w 04 .0 0 Z BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) U ct w 0 �A 3 z `1 :O al z 0 z E al • -n 0 MEASURABLE TARGET I .= U IA 0 aa) U rn o �d cc) ui -0m ' ^'' 0' a) (NI" 0 r—' ti •.+ 0 0� ^' 0 0 -4-' A ON o --' U » ti) '�- fn �M - •'' a) a) c� 0 aa) •ca a) ON o; a, Oil cri ' gc-�,• ta�� 8o 111 d) c- w ▪ 8 o ct U � Va) a) • 174 U U "O • 'C g • CS CS O O U U CC CC 1.4 O 0 00 � -0 at as • cirri O • 0 cq as as -0 5 O .0, c•3 0 4-4 4-4 0 z VIII-76 1/40 Cs•1 -,—, 0 z No joint Program No joint Program By FY 1994, coordinate with Palm Beach Gardens regarding the preparation of a Joint Drainage Study to assess the capabilities of the drainage easement discharging to Prosperity Harbor. (3.5) Ct3 0 •-, 0 0 c1 cr 0 z ‘,0 vilI-77 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON t E W V 0 8' 0 a 0 w o CURRENT CONDITION o a)E a' .--� 0 W > v ) 0 en o a o 4.4 � r4 BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) o o a a 14 .0 o o 0 en tri o z `1 Ti En o 0 P4 W a) 4. UW ›.. a0i Z. 0p›.+� A laz •E ` — v y c`1 0 › aa) 5, _45Cco�E E< 8 A 8 rg � o H a� • gill1•°o � ; •fly 4a)0, '"'S. --/ . O 'LY a)g 10 N Ent p 0 '. 0 �--� �' O ai a� 1b,o wa�a,41-1 �v, � •4ag�AZ VIII-78 "1 I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GOAL: The Village shall undertake actions necessary to efficiently provide needed public facilities to all residents within North Palm Beach in a timely manner which protects investments in and maximizes the use of existing facilities, and promotes orderly compact municipal growth. Further decisions to finance public facilities improvements shall be based upon the use of sound fiscal policy oriented to minimizing Village debt service liabilities. AMENDMENT: The Capital Improvements Element has been amended twice (Amendments 90-1 and 92-2) since the initial plan was completed. Detailed discussions of these amendments are presented in SECTION IV. STATUS OF THE ELEMENT: There are six objectives, supported by 20 policies in this Element, as amended. CHANGES IN CONDITION: The Capital Improvements Element was amended twice since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to: (1) incorporate more specific concurrency provisions, as well as provisions for an adequate facilities ordinance; and (2) incorporate Level -Of -Service standard revisions; and (3) provide for the use of individual and/or package water and wastewater systems in Planning Area 1. Several changes to the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements have been made since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive plan. The rationale for schedule changes is discussed in other Elements of this Section. A list of the issues resulting in schedule changes is as follows: 1. The issue of liability involved if the Village were to create a toxic waste separation and collection program; 2. The need to complete the NPDES permit program prior to completing any master drainage studies; and 3. The priority placed upon the Lakeside Park erosion control program over that of the C-17 Canal bank. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADOPTED PLAN: The Capital Improvements Element, as amended, has generally been effective in terms of guiding the provision of municipal services the Village at levels defined by adopted Level -Of -Service (LOS) standards. Due to the lack of development, adequacy of services has not been an issue. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the objectives and policies of the Capital Improvements Element is presented in the attached matrix. The evaluation presented in the matrix is oriented VIII-79 to determining whether or not objectives and/or policies were achieved. MAJOR PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT: No major problems of development are identified. Current and projected service needs should be able to be met without compromising adopted LOS standards. All services are operating at an acceptable service level. UNFORESEEN PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES: Unforeseen problems related to implementation of the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements are discussed above. No additional problems or opportunities are defined. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO THE STATE AND REGIONAL REQUIREMENTS: The Capital Improvements Element is generally consistent with and furthers the State Comprehensive Plan. No inconsistencies are identified. The Capital Improvements Element is concluded to _remain consistent with the Regional Policy Plan, as revisedtby Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1995. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES: The Capital Improvements Element is generally consistent with and furthers F.S. 163. No inconsistencies are identified. CONSISTENCY WITH CHANGES TO CHAPTER 9J-5, FLORIDA ADMIN. CODE: The Capital Improvements Element is generally consistent with F.A.C. 9J-5. F.A.C. 9J-5.016 contains some revised requirements since the adoption of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan which will be addressed during the preparation of the E.A.R. based amendments. A summary of the revised requirements is as follows: Section Required Action 9J-5.016 Revised requirement to include an adequate Concurrency Management System. 9J-5.016(3) (c) Requires a new policy for the provision of facilities concurrent with impacts of development. 9J-5.016(4)(b) Revised requirement to include provisions that public facilities meet concurrency. The revised requirements, as well as preparation and adoption of appropriate Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be completed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. VIII-80 RECOMMENDATIONS: Measureability of Capital Improvements Element objectives are generally assigned to their supporting policies. In order to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of policies at the time of the next E.A.R. review, as well as reflect current conditions and incorporate them within the updated Capital Improvements Element, the following actions or wording changes are recommended: Policy 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.3 6.1 6.2 6.3 Recommended Action/Wording No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. No change. Revise to reflect the ongoing need to implement land development regulations. No change. No change. No change. No change. In addition to the above, changes to the 5-Year Schedule of Improvements, determined during the preparation of the Support Documentation phase of the E.A.R. based amendments, should be incorporated within the amendments. VIII-81 a) U M Chi 0 U U • U a) correct existi 1.1 ovements will be OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON a) N e. a) a) CURRENT CONDITION •6 C- 0 U (1) V] a) 0 0 U 0 3-1 U�U 1, V] to E li BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) a: cil �o , ° 2 „0 4-4En•,t VI o 0a�i Uv� AAa") 11 • .� FCa o-, U g o 0 3 +40 U o o PO 0 U o 40 0 U W 1 MEASURABLE TARGET 4 c" N ,--. ,) H ca 'o 3'". o `� AH M 0 a 54) 5 O O • a) o a a o U �q .1573. 711 ra § :14 trn rt N 0 g U Nq 15 . N VIII-82 Hazard Area shall be limited to 100% of those Post -Disaster costs for facilities over which North nditures in the Coastal Hi 1,0 .N U2 0 OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON 0.2 CD CURRENT CONDITION U y bA i , to a) 0 o o z 0 ~ U ct U N tCi A U N U 0 z 4 Q) E - ~� N g• E g U BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (199k1) V 6 0 .�, - i., v2 0 IQ i ct = o z 0 44 0) U 0 .0 o M 0 W i� U a0i. z & O '8 o ›, i-r t: .08 U * E g a 0 0 MEASURABLE TARGET N 8 faig 14 TS IA 0 i-, o 9 ov 0 aa 4• r: 4,7 O ; b4 'A 0�„ v� 0 2 U VUj �43 U . 2e W N •r+ N N a ti U b v 0 Ok U.5 VI ,11 0 rn bA •8 8 °Ts s o 0 a t 04-1•P,(4 VIII-83 ted North Palm Beach Level-of- rovements in order to maintain ado cost of facili ct O 0 5 Future develo V 0 4.51 0 u) • U rational control O a) 121 0 4-4 0 y .1i 0 4-4 1-1 Ct 4-1 • a result of de a a a a a Village Budget Procedure 0 a) rn Se CTS p a) 1111 a O N ,O N O D A8 A.a' a) VI AV: aai aai a124 ai r aap4 i Village Budget Procedure No such requirement u4.) a) '1 En a) 'd a8i O Ca �'. 0.80 ., 8 fd 0-4 gOW o . .p., IA'ate).rj • °'., En � 0 5 0 . � y W �w R o 00 1 6 ...., cn U cor .� i Aa a� Q, 0 M 'Pn 4-1 ‘01231I ; l't1 " ctiee c'� 0 di o o 0 .0 y VIII-84 Hz f4 O Oci OBJECTIVE ACHIEVED YES or NO/REASON CURRENT CONDITION 44 °) 10.4 o a�i o al TJ La 16 °) A o a 0 0 IA + . g cn 44 '—' o • U al O O W a' . E o I. a) # U a 6 BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) U z o a 0 O z Ts Z I. o . MEASURABLE TARGET �• iti 0 it.tea CD «3 ,a a4i5oo eA 1.4 8 E - a) •.' .o > O �y f'1' 'O U ,„ ° a' -44 '-' o 4;II e A .a' O sn el -diN aO E-i0 2:8 a) 112 �g 8 c. � c� fu . E-ivA� 3 0Ugg a ) 0g � E,y a0_ GP E -�O U Q. 01 c o VIII-85 time needed. Yes BASELINE CONDITIONS AT DATE OF ADOPTION (1990) 5 1.4 0 U z g O O z E co 1 vZ Ca z IMEASURABLE TARGET I a�� .oa fltig .a) tu R N g g HA co +t% .-i 6 row V ��� ' -k.4.4g wOa O 0› 0 u it UA .) at 0 04- ifi VIII-86 `%III-87 SECTION IX IDENTIFICATION OF NEEDED • CTIONS INTRODUCTION l This section provides a summary of the conclusions and recommended actions developed in the previous sections of the Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.), including: 1. The definition of any new or special studies, or updated Support Documentation necessitated by changes in local conditions, to be undertaken as part of the process to develop the E.A.R.-based amendment; 2. The identification of actions required to incorporate updated or amended statutory or rule requirements, to be undertaken as part of the process to develop the E.A.R.-based amendment; 3. The definition of necessary amendments resulting from the comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results; and 4. The identification of actions required to address planning issues raised by the Local Planning Agency or the Village Council in the preparation of the E.A.R. The remainder of this Section presents an element -by -element summary of conclusions and recommended actions. A. FUTURE LAND USE 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Future Land Use element data and projections are presented in Section V. Data should be incorporated to provide the basis for creating a mixed -use Future Land Use category for application to the Twin City Mall site. No specific additional data needs are identified; however, information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. All existing conditions maps will be updated to reflect expanded corporate limits resulting from annexation actions during the 1989 - 1996 period. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-4A. IX-1 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-15. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-4B. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. Review of the proposed Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.) by the Local Planning Agency and the Village Council resulted in the definition of the following actions to be undertaken during the preparation of the E.A.R.-based amendments: a. Review of Special Policy 5.2, which address the Our Lady of Florida Spiritual Center parcel, for the purpose of incorporating language to more specifically define the future residential and/or commercial redevelopment potential. b. Incorporate a Special Policy clarifying the location of building height restrictions currently defined in the Zoning Code as "... the area of the Village of North Palm Beach which lies south and west of the Intracoastal Waterway and west of U.S. Highway No. 1...". c. Add a new Policy to jointly (i.e. with the Town of Lake Park) develop and implement uniform development and redevelopment standards along the Northlake Boulevard corridor, as well as a program for the refurbishment thereof. d. Readdress the importance of the 40% Impervious Area Groundwater Recharge LOS standard and draft alternarive language, if appriopriate, to satisfy the intent of the requirement. e. Consider a Future Land Use Map change from "Other Public Facilities" to "Recreation And Open Space" for the decommissioned Anchorage Drive wastewater plant site. B. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Traffic Circulation element data and projections are presented in Section V. No specific additional data needs are identified therein; however, additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. IX-2 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-12. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-15. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-13. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. Review of the proposed Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.) by the Local Planning Agency and the Village Council resulted in the definition of the following actions to be undertaken during the preparation of the E.A.R.-based amendments: a. Delete Policy 2.3 since traffic projections indicate that Prosperity Farms Road will not need further widening. C. HOUSING 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Housing element data and projections are presented in Section V. Data needs to be updated to reflect the recent removal and conversion of White Sails Mobile Home Park. Further, a. survey of existing rents in the Village should be completed as a means of identifying the number of units available to very -low and low income households. Additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-22A. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-24. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-23. IX-3 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. No actions were defined. D. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge element data and projections are presented in Section V. Additional data needs are defined as follows: (1) Incorporate the results of the final Water and Wastewater Master Plan Revision of 1995; (2) determine the appropriateness of incorporating revised sanitary sewer, potable water and solid waste Level -of -Service (LOS) standards; (3) incorporate appropriate data, analyses and conditions from the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit program and the Surface Water Improvement Management (SWIM) plan; (4) incorporate additional drainage system inventory in areas annexed to the Village, as well as new developments in Planning Area 6A; and (5) incorporate the results of the Ground Water Basin Resource Availability Inventory (GWBRAI), if available. Additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-29. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-32. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-30. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. No actions were defined. E. COASTAL MANAGEMENT 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Coastal Management element data and projections are presented in Section V. Additional data needs are defined IX-4 J as follows: (1) Update Table 27 Section V, page V-60) to include information on Milling's Marina; (2) update maps to indicate the locations of two new historic sites located in Planning Area 1; (3) update data regarding water quality in the Village from sources administering sampling programs in the County; (4) incorporate the results of the County's Marina Siting Plan and Manatee Protection Ordinance, if available; (5) incorporate any revisions or updates to the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Management Plan; and (6) incorporate any updated information regarding beach renourishment programs in Planning Area 1. Additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-44. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-46. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-44. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. Review of the proposed Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.) by the Local Planning Agency and the Village Council resulted in the definition of the following actions to be undertaken during the preparation of the E.A.R.-based amendments: a. Delete Policy 3.1, requiring public access each 1,000 feet along ,the North Palm Beach Waterway, and replace it with a more appropriate Policy regarding public access. F. CONSERVATION. 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Conservation element data and projections are presented in Section V. Additional data needs are identified therein. Additional data needs are defined as follows: (1) Incorporate any data regarding canal bank erosion of the C-17 Canal available from the South Florida Water Management District; (2) update data regarding water quality in the Village from sources administering sampling programs in the County, including NPDES permit program, SWIM program and Health Department and IX-5 Environmental Resources Management sampling programs; and (3) incorporate data from the completed Lake Worth Environmental Studies. Additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-55. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-57. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-56. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. Review of the proposed Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.) by the Local Planning Agency and the Village Council resulted in the definition of the following actions to be undertaken during the preparation of the E.A.R.-based amendments: a. Revise Policy 2.3 to present North Palm Beach's continuing concern for upstream pollutants entering the surface water system within the Village, as well as the need for upstream controls to assist in effecting improved water quality within the Village. G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Recreation And Open Space element data and projections are presented in Section V. Data regarding cost estimates, property acquisition, funding mechanisms and construction schedules for implementing the Village Master Recreation Plan should be incorporated within the E.A.R.-based amendments. Additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIII-62. IX-6 -3. Objectives And Policies Updates. comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-64. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-62. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. No actions were defined. H. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Intergovernmental Coordination element data and projections are presented in Section V. No specific additional data needs are identified therein; however, additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. No actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are required. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-73. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-71. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. Review of the proposed Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.) by the Local Planning Agency and the Village Council resulted in the definition of the following actions to be undertaken during the preparation of the E.A.R.-based amendments: a. Readdress, by cooperating with abutting jurisdictions, the definition of the Village's future annexation area, as illustrated on FIGURE 3-17 of the Future Land Use Element. I. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. Special Studies Or Updated Support Documentation. Updated Capital Improvements element data and projections are presented in Section V. No specific additional data needs are identified therein; however, additional information will be collected and analyzed, as necessary, to meet the compliance requirements of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. 2. Statutory Or Rule Requirement Actions. Required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented on page VIM -80. 3. Objectives And Policies Updates. A comparison of the objectives and policies of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan with actual results is presented in the matrix commencing on page VIII-82. Based upon the results of the analysis completed in the matrix, recommended actions/wording changes are presented on page VIII-81. 4. Local Planning Agency Or Village Council Actions. No actions were defined. J. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS In addition to the revised requirements resulting from changes to Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code which are addressed in the above Comprehensive Plan elements, further revised Code requirements must be addressed. Additional required actions resulting from an analysis of changes to the Florida Administrative Code are presented below. 1. General Requirements Section 9J-5.005 (1) (c ) 9J-5.005(2)(e) 9J-5.005(3) Required Action Requirement to include Countywide marina siting plan. Requirement for revised population projection procedures. New requirement to establish LOS standards for each public facility rather than systemwide basis. IX-8 9J-5.005(6) Requirement to establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and development of land. 2. Concurrency Management Section Required Action 9J-5.055 New requirement to establish a concurrency management system. The revised requirements, as well as preparation, and adoption of appropriate Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be completed during the preparation of E.A.R. based. amendments. The revised requirements, as well as preparation and adoption of appropriate Comprehensive Plan amendments, will be completed during the preparation of E.A.R. based amendments. SECTION X PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS This SECTION includes a summary of the public participation process undertaken by the Village in completing the Evaluation And Appraisal Report (E.A.R.). The Village of North Palm Beach adopted Resolution 12-87 (Ref: FIGURE 3) to establish specific public participation procedures for use in preparing its Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) and updated Comprehensive Plan. The Resolution is included in the Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan. The procedures outlined in the Resolution were followed in the preparation of the EAR. The public participation procedures are based upon the requirements of: Florida Statutes, Sections 163.3181(1) and (2); and Florida Administrative Code, Sections 9J-5.0053(2)(c) and 9J-5.004. - A series of public meetings, regarding the E.A.R., was conducted by the Local Planning Agency (LPA). The schedule of_ public meetings, along with the associated topics of discussion, is presented in FIGURE 4. An advertised public hearing was held by the LPA on July 2, 1996. A copy of the legal advertisement for the public hearing is included as FIGURE 5. Following the public hearing, on July 2, 1996, the LPA passed a motion recommending approval of the E.A.R. by the Village council. - An advertised public hearing was held by. the Village Council on August 22, 1996. A copy of the legal advertisement for the public hearing is included as FIGURE 6. Following the- public hearing, on August 22, 1996, the Village Council passed a resolutionapproving the E.A.R. A copy of the adopting resolution, Resolution 56-96, is attached as FIGURE 7. FIGURE 3 RESCLL I ICt1 M. 12-87 - 1987 F. RESOLUTION OF THE V t:LPGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PALM BEACH ► FLORIDA, ADOPTING PFCC CURES TO PROVIDE FOR AND ENCOURAGE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE PLANNING l?FrJCESS 'Ili UPDATE THE ..311PREiENSIVE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL GONTIMOMT COMPREHENSIVE PIANIWING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ACT AND CHAPTER S T5, FLORIDA ACMINISTRAME CODE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE 'JILIAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PACK BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Village shall place an advertisement in a newspaper of genera.1 circulation that puts the ::eai property tamers in North Palm Beach and the general public on notice that the Village has begun to update and prepare a proposed, revised Carprehensive Plan in conformance with requirements of the 1935 Local Government Ccnprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, as amended, as well as an Evaluation and Appraisal Report of the Village's current Comprehensive Plan, and that copies cf information, data and reports will be on file at Village Hall, the Library ard the Public Services, Building as they hectare available for public inspection and review. The advertLsarent shall be placed in a part of the newspaper other than the legal ads; or classifieds sections of the paper. Section 2. At arr ninon the Village shall use t1'e monthly newsletter to provide a status of the comprehensive planning program and to keep the resident.; of North Palm Beach informe3 on the progress of the Comprehensive Plan and Evaluation of Appraisal Report. Section 3. In the ir..itial advertisement that puts the residents and general public on notice regarding the comprehensive planning program, the public should also be notified that written or rrnenta from the public are encouraged and that written torrents' should be forwarded to theVillage Manager's:,Office at 501 U.S. Highway .1, North Palm Beach, FL, 33408. The public should also be notified that written comment sheets will be available at Village Hall, the Library and the .Public Services Building for the public's use. Section 4. At a minimum the Village shall hold aFperopriate public hearings a:; di;etated by the 198S Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act., as amended. However, if'dleemed necessary and appropriate by the Local Planning Agency that additional public hearings be held to di:,cuss various elements or oonoerns related to they Comprehensive Plan and Evaluation and Appraisal Report, the same procedures and requirements of Chapter 16.3, Part II, Florida Statutes shall be adhered to. X-2 sul-L'_-17770 ,JLLnac O- rv.rr_'1 DC•':LL. TO no4o T V17., r . em Section 5. The Village staff shall provide a wr:.tten response to each written .:0mrent submitted to they Local Planning Agency if the subject has been addresse by the Local Planning Agency. The response shalt. indicate the nature and the irate of the action taken n by the Local Planning Agency regarding the subject el the public moments. If the Local Planning Agency has not addressed the subject of the written cannent, the Village staff will respond to the public cement with the anticipated date of the Local Planning Agency discussion of the subject. ,Section 6. The Local Planning Agency shall, at a minimum, provide information to the residents of North Palm Beach and the general public in a manner o:nsistent with the pub:.i.c participation requirements stated above. Executive ;tnmaries- will be prc:J`•ided only when, and if , • deemed appropriate and nece:a sary by the Local Planning ng Agency. ;Section 7. This Resc:►].ution shall take effect irrnediately upon passage. _ PASSED A;3D ADOPTED THIS 26th. DAY OF ATTEST: Vil ga Clerk MARCH , 1987. FIGURE 4 LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC. ZONING & URBAN PLANNING .1300 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE • SUITE C MARKET RESEARCH & ANALYSIS WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33409-6316 �44NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS TEL: (407) 686-2481 • FAX: 684-8709 TO: Tom Hogarth FROM: Jim Fleischmann RE: LPA Workshop Schedule for Evaluation and Appraisal Report, (E.A.R.) by Comprehensive Plan Element DATE: May 23, 1996 MEMO The following represents a proposed LPA workshop schedule to review the Village's proposed E.A.R. Workshop Date June 4, 1996 Future Land Use; Traffic Circulation; Housing. June 11, 1996 June 18, 1996 June 25, 1996 (If necessary) July 2, 1996 Comprehensive Plan Elements to be reviewed Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Conservation; Coastal Zone. Recreation and Open Space; Intergovernmental Coordination; Capital Improvements. Final discussion of any of the above elements continued from a prior meeting. LPA Public Hearing on E.A.R. and transmittal recommendation to Village Council. It is anticipated that the above schedule can adequately accommodate the E.A.R. review, assuming approximately two hours per meeting. The LPA public hearing should be advertised at least 7 days in advance. Jes . P. Fleischmann, ce President X-4 NO. 229826 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION / LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY • Notice is hereby given pursuant to Fbrida Statutes Chapter 163, that the local Plan- „ ning Agency (LPA) will hold a Public Hear- ing concerning the preparation of the Village's Evaluation and Appraisal Report. In accordance with F.S. Chapter 163, Part II, the Village of North Palm Beach must. conduct an Evaluation and Appraisal Re-' port (EAR) of its Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the EAR is to assess the suc- cess or failure of the Village's Compre- hensive Plan and to provide objectives and policies to adequately address the needs of the Village due to changing conditions. • The nine elements of the Comprehensive Plan will be discussed. The elements are: Conservation, Infrastructure, Intergovern- mental Coordination, Traffic, Recreation and Open Space, Housing, Future Land Use, Capital Improvement and Coastal. Management. The Public Hearing will be held on Tues- day, July 2, of 7:00 P.M. in the Village Hall Council Room, 501 U.S. #1, North Palm Beach, Florida. The public is invited to attend this hearing or submit written comments to the Village of North Palm Beach regarding the Evalu- ation and Appraisal Report. Copies of the Work Product For the Evalu- ation and Appraisal Report may be re- viewed by the public at the Office of the Village Clerk located at 501 U.S. #1, weekdays, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Additional informa- tion may be obtained by contacting tee Public Services Director at (407) 626- 0212. PUBUSH: June 25, 1996 • THE PALM BEACH POST TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 1996 FIGURE 5 THE PALM BEACH POST Published Daily and Sunday West Palm Beach. Palm Beach County. Florida PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH . Before the undersigned authority personally appearedChris Bull who on oath says that she/he Is Class adv Mgr of The Palm Beach Post. a daily and Sunday newspaper published at West Palm Beach in Palm Beach County. Florida; that the attached copy of advertising. being a hint i c a In the matter of Public Hearing in the Court. was published in said newspaper in the Issues of •June 25, 1996 Atfiant further says that the said The Post is a newspaper published at West Palm Beach. In said Palm Beach County. Florida. and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Palm Beach County. Florida, daily and Sunday and has been entered as second class mall matter at the post office in West Palm Beach. in said Palm Beach County. Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and afitant further says that she/he has neither paid nor promised any person. firm or corporation any discount. rebate. commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication In the said newspaper. ARY SLAL KAREN M MC; INTeN NOTARY Pl:af.1C Si'A r- OF FLORIDA COmmisnoOt: NO CC24 i4tio MY COMM:SSfON h(P. NOV. 1- 1994 L4 fore me this 26 day of June A D 1996 , /f::.-'•:74', Karen M. McLinton. Notary Public Personally known IX. or Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced X-5 FIGURE 6 THE PALM BEACH POST Published Daily and Sunday West Palm Beach. Palm Beach County. Florida PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA' COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Chris Bul l who on oath says that she/he is Class Adv Mgr of The Palm Beach Post. a daily and Sunday newspaper published at West Palm Beach in Palm Beach County. Florida: that the attached copy of advertising. being a Notice E.A.R. in the matter of in the ---- Court. was published in said newspaper in the issues of August 8, 1996 Affiant further says that the said The Post is a newspaper published at West Palm Beach. in said Palm Beach County. Florida. and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Palm Beach County. Florida. daily and Sunday and has been entered as second class .nail matter at the post office in West Palm Beach. in said Palm Beach County. Florida. for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement: and affiant further says that she/he has neither paid nor promised any person. firm or corporation any discount. rebate. commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the d newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed !*fore me this 8 day of August A.D. 19 96 .t :74:At. NciTA^'i I•_ i.1, J i.ORIDA MY CO', Fxi• \CA'. i^19% 241430 I ersonally known XX or Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced Karen`M. Mcl inton. Notary Public NO. 236899 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH VILLAGE COUNCIL Notice is hereby given pursuant to Florida Statutes Chap- Ccwnc� xvill.holdrp:Pul�li4.�lsar ing concernin the a option of the Village's Evaluation a yc, cnd Appraisal Report. In accordance with F.S. Chapter 163, Part II, the Village • of North Palm Beach must conduct an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of its Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the EAR.is to assess the success or failure of the Village's Comprehensive Plan and to provide objec- tives and policies to adequately address the needs of the Village due to changing conditions. The nine elements of the Comprehensive Plan will be discussed. The elements are: Conservation, Infrastruc- ture, Intergovernmental Coordination, Traffic, Recreation and Open Space, Housing, Future Land Use, Capital Improvement and Coastal Management. The Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, August 22, at 7:25 P.M. in the Village Hall Council Room, 501 U.S. #1, North Palm Beach, Florida. The public is invited to attend this hearing or submit writ- ten comments to the Village of North Palm Beach re- garding the Evaluation and Appraisal Report. Copies of the Work Product for the Evaluation and the praisal Report may be reviewed by the public at the Office of the Village Clerk located at 501 U.S. #1, week- days, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Additional information may be obtained by contacting the Public Services Director at (407) 626-0212. PUBLISH: August 8, 1996. FIGURE 7 RESOLUTION NO, 56-96 A R :3c)LUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM :B:;ACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH ZN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT ACT," BEING SECTIONS 1 6 3 .::• 161 ET. SEQ., FLOR::DA STATUTES, ATTACHED AS H XHIBIT "A"; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING VILTAG,E STAFF TO TRANSM:::T Tk:XS RESOLUTION AND ACCOMPANYING REPORT TO TEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUYITY AFFAIRS FOR SUFFICIENCY REVIEW; AND PROWDING XNG FOR AN EFE'EC'::VE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seg. , Florida S'.atutes, the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act, the Village of North Palm Beach is, required to periodically prepaxe and adopt an Evaluation and Appraisal Report to evaluate the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, I:he Planning Commission acting as the local planning alency held anadvertised public hearing on July 2, 1996, and recommendedap;)rovai of the Evaltivation. and Appraisal Report; and WHEREAS, :.F.e Village Counci.l held a public hearing on August 22, 1996, to cmsi.der the Evaluat:.:.on and Appraisal Report; and WHEREAS, the Village Councilfinds that the evaluation and a:Dpraiaal repo►:ft has been prepared consistent and in accordance with Chapter 1„►2 , Florida Statutes, and Rule 9 J-5, Florida X-7 (-'� Administrative code, and that such report will ensure tho.t: the plan continues to provide sufficient guidance to the Village recrar_ding land development decisions. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NORTH PJLLM BEACH, FLORIDA: The Village Council of th.e Village of North Palm beach, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Rile 9 J-5, Florida Administrative . Code, hereby adopts the Evaluation and. Appraisal Report cf the Village of North Palm Beach F,Lorida, wh.ioh ._s attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and, made a part hereof. Sec ti.i:...2_._. The Village: Manager is hereby authorized and, directed. to traa,3mit the adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report of the Village cf North Palm Beach, Florida, to the Florida Department Community A:: f air. s for sufficiency determination. lapticn_ 3 This Resolution. together with Exhibit rWt shall be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs prior to September 1 1996. e_c:t:;or This Resolution shall take effect irimediateiy upcn its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF _ AUGUST 1996. (Village Seal) ATTEST: iee;1444.0.Z14 Village C:.erk MAYOR X-9 TOTAL P.04 APPENDIX A EXHIBITS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION APPENDIX A CHAPTER II LIST OF EXHIBITS CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION Exhibit Page Section A Future Land Use A- 1 Generalized Soils Map A- 1 A- 2 Flood Zones A- 2 A- 3.1 Natural /vegetation, Wetlands, Coastal Vegetation And Beaches. . . . . . . A- 3 A- 3.2 Defined Mangrove Area - Planning Area 6-A A- 4 A- 3.3 Wetlands, Coastal Vegetation And Beaches A- 5 A- 4 Surface Water Features. . . . . . A- 6 A- 5 Land Use Classification System. . • A- 7 A- 6 Existing Land Use (Table) .. • A- 8 A- 7 North Palm Beach Planning Areas . . . . A- 9 A- 8 Map Key: Existing Land Use Map Series . A-10 A- 9 Planning Area 1 Existing Land Use (Map) A-11 A-10 Planning Area 2 Existing Land Use (Map) A-12 A-11 Planning Area 3A Existing Land Use (Map) A-13 A-12 Planning Area 3B Existing Land Use (Map) A-14 A-13 Planning Area 3B Existing Land Use (Map) A-15 A-14 Planning Area 4A Existing Land Use (Map) A-16 �-� A-15 Planning Area 4B Existing Land Use (Map A-17 A-16 Planning Area 5 Existing Land Use (Map) A-18 A-17 Planning Area 6A Existing Land Use (Map) A-19 A-18 Planning Area 6B Existing Land Use (Map) A-20 A-19 Planning Area 7 Existing Land Use (Map) A-21 A-20 Historical Resident Population Growth Rates A-22 A-21 Calculation Of 1986 Maximum Day Seasonal Population Levels A-23 A-22 Vacant Land Summary A-24 A-23 Residential Land Use Projections. . . ▪ A-25 Section B Traffic Circulation B-1 Existing Functional Roadway Classification Map A-26 B-2 Existing Major Roadway System Inventory of North Palm Beach. . A-27 B-3 Traffic Volumes Inventory A-28 B-4.1 Capacity Analysis For Existing Roadway System (1989 Traffic Volumes) . A-29 B-4.2 Peak Hour Capacity Analysis For Existing Roadway System (1989 Peak Hour Volumes) A-30 Exhibit Page B-5 Five Year Capacity Analysis Of Roadway System (1994) A-31 B-6 Projected Ten Year Capacity Analysis Of Roadway System (1999) A-32 Section C Housing C-1 Comparative Housing Tenure Characteristics, 1980 A-33 C-2 Monthly Gross Rent Of Renter -Occupied Units & Rent -To -Income Ratio For Renter -Occupied Housing Units, 1980 . . A-34 C-3 Value Of Owner -Occupied Housing, 1980, Monthly Owner Costs Of Owner -Occupied Housing Units, 1980 & Owner Cost -To - Income Ratio For Owner -Occupied Housing Units, 1980 A-35 C-4 Comparative Age Of Year -Round Housing Units, 1980 A-36 Section D Infrastructure Sub -Section D1 Sanitary Sewer D1 -1 D1 -2 D1 -3 D1 -4 Palm Beach County Regional Service Areas A-37 Subregional Wastewater Service Areas. . A-38 Seacoast Utilities Wastewater Plants And Service Areas..... A-39 Wastewater Transmission Schematic . . . A-40 Sub -Section D2 Solid Waste D2-1. Solid Waste Generation/Collection, 1987 A-41 D2-2 Permanent Resident/Seasonal Unit Projections, Equivalent Population Projection By Residential Unit Type & Village Solid Waste Generation Projections A-42 Sub -Section D3 Drainage D3-1 Palm Beach County Drainage Basins . . . A-43 D3-2 Drainage Areas A-44 D3-3 Village Of North Palm Beach Drainage Areas A-45 Sub -Section D4 Potable Water D4-1 Seacoast Utilities Plant Service Areas. A-47 D4-2 Seacoast Utilities Water Treatment Plant Facilities. . A-48 Exhibit Page Sub -Section D5 Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge D5-1 Wellfield/Planning Area Relationships . . A-49 Section E Coastal Management El Coastal Area Map A-50 E2 Water Dependent And Water Related Uses Map A-51 E3 Marinas And Boating Facilities A-52 E4 Hurricane Evacuation Plan For Storm Surge Vulnerable Zones A-53 Section F Conservation (No Exhibits Included) Section G Recreation And Open Space G-1 Recreation And Open Space Facilities . A-54 G-2 Recreation Facilities Map A-56 G-3 Major Recreational And Open Space Sites/Facilities A-57 G-4 Recreation And Open Space Analysis Using Discounted Standards A-60 Section H Intergovernmental Coordination H-1 Agencies And Organizations With Which North Palm Beach Coordinates Its Activities. A-61 H-2 Infrastructure Services Implementing Mechanisms A-62 Section I Capital Improvements I-1 Public Health & School Facilities. . . A-63 I-2 General Fund Revenues - 1986/87. . . . A-64 I-3 Enterprise Fund Revenues - 1986/87 . . A-65 I-4 Annual Debt Service A-66 I-5 North Palm Beach Capital Improvements, 1990 - 1995 A-67 I-6 5-Year Schedule Of Improvements, 1990 - 1995 A-68 I-7 Capital Improvements Expenditure Potential, General Fund A-70 I-8 North Palm Beach Level Of Service (LOS) Standards A-71 ri II Northlake CORPORATE LIMITS KEY: I. ARENTS(un©AN LAND COMPLEX) 7. CANAVERALtuneAM LAMo court.cx) 2. QUARTZIPSAMMENTS 8. COCOAtunoAN LAND COMPLEX) 3. URtIAN LAND 9. BASINGER,FINE SAND 4. TIDAL SWAMP 10. RIVIERA (URBAN LANo COMPLEX) 3. BEACHES I I. BASINGER (UPtdAti LAHO cowrLtx) E3. PALM BEACH(u, AH LAxo coMrLEx) SCALE: 1 In./1000 ft. EXHIBIT A-1 ; GENERALIZED SOILS MAP Source: Figure 3-3, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. - W m z 0 N L;* r, w oZ ( I N w z I N J PROSPERITY FARMS -.d. U w z 0 N U w z 0 N co W z 0 N EXHIBIT A-2 FLOOD VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH o. EXHIBIT A-3.1 ........... , oce t j T �P o'c - f��y G / 1 utisol '''''' liZc;01*. 5: o •=CC �� c� m Cj*' • ' f �..� I W oPt'`, r-r 1::.‘\.\\; q - - - --- i • a I�MD r trtMT. .i. 0 )rt 0 En • r-I 0 0 ag a • CO �rn 0rn 2- 14-1 oa) v 4 • 0 4J r-i 0 < O 4J .4_) E •0-) 0 w Q v 0 CIS PROSPERITY FARMS ROAD EXHIBIT A-3.2 DEFINED MANGROVE AREA - PLANNING AREA 6 A REF: FIGURE 3-13A ♦♦ MONET ROAD ii7"-174+�i*'+i�-•-•++♦+ii4ii.-• ��������j+ii+s♦+++�'ii� MANGROVE AREA SOURCE: FDER DREDGE & FILL PERMIT f 500655759, LRM Inc. SCALE NTS Source: Figure 3-5B, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-4 EXHIBIT A-3.3 WETLANDS, COASTAL VEGETATION AP) BEACHES 1 V EG ETATI O N 111111111 MARINE VEGETATION MIXED EXOTICS 111 PINE AUSTRALIAN 3 4 6 MIXED HAMMOCK TROPICAL HAMMOCK 7 1"'''‘ OUNE MANGROVE 8 BEACH SOURCE: JOHN D. McARTHUR BEACIl TATE PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN SCALE: NTS Source: Figure 3-5C, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. Cl)= cc m 2pi a J a11.1 cc H cc Q z u- W w • V Q • ac - M > CO EXHIBIT A-4 occpN P:0 pN11G SCALE IN NILLS• V / Iiti a zd a a .' � U W W �za LAND NISIANCN MANADI MINT. IN. CA • CO rn z 4 0 CD a)O U 0 0 • M � W E to • O wQ r4 • H U 0 Cn EXHIBIT A-5 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM For purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, the following land use .classifications, which are applicable to North Palm Beach, are used to describe existingland uses in the Village. The classifications are consistent with those defined in Chapter 9J5, F.A.C. and concurrent with the Village's perception of use. Residential: Commercial: Land uses and activities within land areas used predominantly for housing and excluding all tourist accommodations. Land uses and activities within land areas which are predominantly related to the sale, rental and distribution of products and the provision of performance of services. Recreation/ Land uses and activities within land areas where Open Space: recreation occurs and lands which are either developed or vacant and concerned with active or passive recreational use. Conservation/: Land uses and activities within land areas "designated" for the primary purpose of conserving or protecting natural resources or environmental quality, and includes areas designated for such purposes, qr combinations thereof, as primary recreation, flood control; protection of quality or quantity of ground water or surface water, flood plain management, fisheries management, and/or protection of vegetative community or wildlife habitats. Public Build- Lands and structures that are/owned, leased, or ings & operated by a government entity, such as Grounds: libraries, police stations, fire stations, post offices, government administration buildings, and areas used for associated storage of vehicles and equipment. Also, lands and structures owned or operated by a private entity and used for a public purpose such as a privately held but publically regulated utility. Educational: Other Public Facilities: Transporta- tion: Land use activities and facilities of public or private primary or secondary schools, vocational and technical schools, and colleges and universities licensed by the Florida Department of Education, including the areas of buildings, campus open space, dormitories, recreational facilities or parking. Land uses and activities within land areas concerned with other public or private facilities and institutions such as churches, clubs, fraternal organizations, homes for the aged and infirm, and other similar uses. Land areas and uses devoted to the movement of goods and people including streets and associated rights -of -way. Water: All areas covered by water or any right-of-way for the purpose of conveying or storing water. vacant: Undeveloped land areas which are available for future development, and which are not included in any of the other land use classifications. Source: Table 3-4, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. Land Use EXHIBIT A-6 EXISTING LAND USE Area in Total % of Developed % of Acres Acres Area Total Area Residential 765.72 25.0 23.9 Low Density 583.19 (0-5.8 units/acre) Medium Density 8.81 (5.81-11.0 units/acre) High Density 173.72 (11.1-24.0 units/acre) Commercial* 143.37 143.37 4.7 4.5 Recreation/Open Space 196.98 196.98 6.4 6.1 Conservation/Open'Space 3844.70 384.70 12.5 12.0 Public Buildings and Grounds 14.08 14.08 0.5 0.4 Educational 14.58 14.58i 0.5 0.4 Other Public Facilities 49.87 49.87 1.6 1.6 Transportation* 268.59 268.59 8.8 8.4 Water 1225.10 1225.10 40.0 38.2 Total Devel. 3062.99 100.0 Vacant* 141.31 --- 4.5 TOTAL 3204.48 100.0 *Includes parcel of land annexed to the Village in Planning Area 6A (North of Monet Road) in October, 1989. Land Use Figures reflect the 1988 land use of the property. SOURCE: Public Services Department, North Palm Beach, 4/1/78 JLH Associates, 8/1/87, LRM, Inc. 2/1/88; 3/10/89; and 9/25/89. Source: Table 3-5, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-8 n !-T 0 cti O U rt a �rn co � rn o,- z ov (1)O .4-3 cti �—t O • > 0 cn b U N E b1 U •� 0 wQ (1) 0 .l EXHIBIT A-8 MAP KEY: EXISTING LAND USE MAP SERIES LAND USE CATEGORY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL RECREATION/ OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION PUBLIC BUILDINGS/ GROUNDS EDUCATIONAL OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES VACANT WATER (NO PATTERN: REF: FIGURE 3-6) PRIMARY STREETS (NO PATTERN: REF: FIGURE 3-7) PATTERN Source: Table 3-11, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-1 0 111111111/111111ri Ci 14, R3 Rl a TT ii ri ri akat k• y • r r • • • • • • EARIM RIVER •-$PB 15 SPBT9 0 13 • I n 4 C-17 CANAL) • • -R3 'Ounce* LAW. ►NC.i/Se LITTLE vvw►ow nnnnr EXHIBIT A-91 KEY: CORPORATE LIMITS* -�- LAND USE CODE - REF* TABLE 3-II NORTH PALM BEACH ZONING DISTRICTS R1 - Single Family Res. R3 - High Density Res. CI - Neighborhood Comm. CIA - Limited Comm. P - Publ I c ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS* Riviera Beach RS-S - Single Family Res. RM=20 - Multi -Family Res. Palm Beach County RS/PBC - Single Family Res. r. Historic Site 17 Florida State' 2 Master File t - 8PB 79 n • �.t J:.J• j_flitt111f1111 Fi I11f1 1111tt SP8214 It RS-6/RB --orC/A • PLANNING AREA 1 .A • EXISTING LAND USE MAP EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES NORTH PALM -j_1tjittitt11ttl11tttit,,;t11fi1*,tlllttltlt*J BEACH pLOt71Oul d O FEET Source: Figure 3-10, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. 11111 ^o.'PBc3'., � Ittlt,t/Iltttttltltl�a TYT-I itliii1111.1iit11 i11,11l. mow :; 1...... ' ' • i" tT*T,'III i� a;., C i� �� I r iscC �f: ' I :MONET ROAD snail TeTITITITIT may• �} NORTH PALM BEACH I I I 0 200 600 FEET FLCRIOA v><-1! •1 i t,1Cil.W t11 Avie ,llI 1 l t1,•ti�`:, l� !,,,..1,1\ciiiii:‘; ii• il•i:tlt tt k**\\\'. �ii1% �tMIIVA%4'.t it "\ 1 �� iiltii:lllii11t1, V lli1; ti:ui : 1� t•� ' ♦ , 'cS� �tr11��� `� ♦, tom' r ♦ 1 '4l,,s,4, I D,,• 4 r I'',• C/A R3 EXHIBIT A-10 KEY: CORPORATE LIMITS: ]Io"- LAND USE CODE - REF: TABLE 3-11 NORTH PALM BEACH ZONING DISTRICTS CI - Neighborhood Commercial CIA - Limited Comm. District R1 - Single Family Res. R3 - High Density Res./Apt. P - Public ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS: Palm Beach Gardens PO - Professional Off. CG-1- General Comm. Palm Beach County RH - High Density Res. RM - Medium Density Res. ▪ 1. CG - General Comm. •• • • O EXISTING LAND USE MAP �J' "EXISTING LANDUSE i . MAP SERIES PLANNING AREA 2 •, Source: Figure 3-11, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-12 T rn CC a u w H E L y o W L A —I CZ rt CD a u 4. {LOM 0 .— 0 0 WN M. U D I d 0 I— I UC. 4 u ZW W. Qi�— .- Cm a— E.0 tat o =c-- �CC`�XUU0. L) J Z •• •IIIIIIIIjIIIII •• IIIIIIIII • A. . • �c • • • • • ♦ EXISTING LANDUSE PLANNING AREA 3A Q a s : _g o a •1 U) rV—$ ow Zm—/ o = w —• o U W 5 � ac z 0 b ...V a iEg'ut • 0 `t"r N ,H A3 co i o e. a Q) a) gig! b� Co)O • CT) CO Is A-1 3 • • CA C CIA CA • - • CA R3 s • • R3 1R1sRPJD 1r TO VILLAOT Or MOTS P).Z1 RTAO1 wort cORr2AtT VITO 7RT DMIRHmfT or t.O.aw, TT ATTAS RS. ?11T fROARATIOR Or TM RAW! OLP la/ r l wARt sALiT _ YN TIMM & CRAB TOOK 7Q ?TAT! or ?LORIDA. / `4 ^, 11111 I i Iwta 7RK LOLL cormaraff OInplamO'SIrt' ri& s. zwe ' '. 111_ R3R[! YiiTlTYG! lY1D AOlRORItm 1T LArf Of rsORIOA." ` t7 RDD ROD taco Source: Figure 3-13, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. if IL EXHIBIT A-12 KEY: CORPORATE LIMITS: LAND USE CODE - REF: TABLE 3-11 NORTH PALM BEACH ZONING DISTRICTS RI - Single Family Res. R3 - High Density Res./Apartment CA - Commercial CB - Commercial (Tourist Oriented) C1 - Neighborhood Commercial CIA - Limited Commercial P - Public EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES PLANNING AREA 3B ', :l EARMAN RIVER O. • • • • (C-17 CANAL)uuI NORTH PALM BEACH FLCR:CA EXHIBIT w Id C U) EE _a_ .- U L L R` e c, - ',etc, u m\ u+ a W .4. _ •J N L — •— m Q C� >Y O O L rZ x.~.� = U W N N m0 _1.--:, �. (h S N U Q I (� 0 L.? a - _ - wZGWm - E - — Jt(.)iSUZ_ W H W Q 1 1 I 1- i Q to "' T ccm o G CI F— O: U C:. c — • Z T — - H��GW ) tC e VV O R T La ttttttj tttttttttttttttt►tttttt► -1 ^ ,,,,, M US HIG 4 ' # 1tttttttt ,------ 0911004t, tittttttt-' ttttttttt 1421 rn 1�1 11 EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES PLANNING AREA 3C a Ow zm 8 O .�J 0 co 0 U o M E a P 4-1 0 a) co M 0 00 ,Q 0 -1-) U 0 A-15 R1 m 0 RI Rt RI R3 .. YI 11• 111�� 1111111111111e1j ._ I R1 i Ri •eu/tele L. 111C.f,11 -Source: Figure 3-15, Village of North Palm Documentation; October, 1989. P3 qs•r 44 ,, R' 4,4 R3 CIA EXHIBIT A-14 KEY: CORPORATE LIMITS:- -� LAND USE CODE - REF: TABLE 3-11 NORTH PALM BEACH ZONING DISTRICTS RI - Single Family.Res. R3 - High Density Res./Apartment CA - Commercial 7.4.4 CI - Neighborhood Commercial :f► CIA - Limited Commercial '') P - Public Historic Site Itr Florida State Master File * - OPfllo7 8PB107 CA EXISTING LAND USE MAP EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES PLANNING AREA 4A A A NORTH PALM E3EACH FLORIO^ II I I 0 200 800 1000 Beach Florida Support EXHIBIT A-15 .. y c -_ - (Y G 1, cn • u, y UI — N _ c J O d N N L- fD CC a, a, 7 S .r 0' rfr. U ?. ?. ` — 0 W f •7 ra • r Li. c - - �� LL a• V v O U a, I O L L .7 v O m c — C" = c` — A J O — — o 0 a lU`,: (fZiL)U1CL F- w q i i i Q In O —r r-.tm— ao+=rQlr_CC UUn 2 Cr O .1 u-� WAY,,, 1, ` '• (}- _ t ai1C U cc wt! cc 4 cc 4 W • EXISTING LAND USE MAP PLANNING AREA 4B EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES •- EXHI u C .... • 4 11 1- v — U L 4 N L - a,• I Cr �. a v Q E 0 elV) • \ It OtY W — • • • E h U J O • N tll X m 1r 40• O v XI- 4 O CC CC U L O •- Z-�++OE Z , LW CZZ _ tWtW►J w E1nrCU 1- C.. .0 0 v I- 1 U• I O . u G •4 C - Q—— .r O EWW O c CP O OZtn CE 1..0 .J- o — 7— •— 7 M 1 1 I • WU Jv1==•ZJa.',C Y I•-WQ I 1.1 1 1 1 La. vcC ccza c WsiNma\ o s—corn-- U (� a.0cc �t-crcr'2'U.Ua. Q rU E LJ — O•to 0 A T U J .. Q J a. CC /: 1 `` cc U ti U j// 2 W cn cn J z W W cc 0 z z -J a 1 0 0 ILI u- 05 0 0 U (CS a) W • 00 o0' z� 4-1 o $-+ a) .c:1 •o r-1 r"-I O •. o N -H I (cc Cr) .J E .blU •.H O w Q • • .a) •• U O A-1 8 EXHIBIT ro .+ y c ,E L a, - Q E u •.. U L a, u c v no - a a, 1 CCca.v. E cc in la �• QN L.) O O >. CC ro la - 0 -... J O o, N N '0- a, .- A L m CC a, a, 0 4 to — ++ Q 0 CC CY O c a, c N t- Z X cn L 0 0 a, Wn E- - -o in "0 u.- W NI,0 E 1.11 i•- 1n .0 ar C 7 0, .. CC IL'c L)c0+�c->.- t)) = Lc- a, - a, .- 0 ro D .. 0) .C. I- 10 a, 1 0 u 0'0 a, L- a, C C o ▪ (-.- -CI) LZtiQZ D.- Z W W 03 - . - •- 4 0 CO J -001 C- tTX)L*'0 1 I I I 0 W U...I •� u(DC0mt9 uL) 0 I-W Q I 1 I 1t-••• 4mm12-m earn CD ct=a Z m�aQn L0 a O0I-lzCCCC0. EL)aa Ecc - tz -,tr -,— - o Z o p ,e oa CJZ Qa O. o t ••t 111 111 111 11111.1 l 11.1111 / 111 / 111IROCIERITT FARMS a_ a ac !!WAA z z H co X W 0 W W co co W z F•- co ;c W PLANNING AREA 6A WATERWAY . 'T •, r ROAD 111111111111111111111111111$111111 • cc CC U) ccl r • ri o 0 o rH � w -o Cd N a 0 z SOURCE: LAM, INC-2/a$ 01 41 O .Q b 4-) U O •. �O co -ri I cd M E tT -r-I 0 w� CU 0 w A-1 9 PROSPERITY IN1 1?! I HARBOR h! t`+1LIJLLUj111.L2{Jttlt 1 1 1) 1 R2 R2 1I •l. • oll 0 I -o r WEST LAKE R RI R2 Rfj R2 P R„, SOURCE: LRY. INC.2/S11 (C. R3 .,,� m RI R1 FR 1 R1 ,R1 RI 0 200 800 FEET EXHIBIT A-18 KEY: CORPORATE LIMITS: - LAND USE CODE - REF: TABLE 3••11 NORTH PALM BEACH ZONING DISTRICTS RI - Single Family Res. R2 - Multi -Family Res. P - Public EXISTING LAND USE MAP EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES PLANNING AREA 68 NORTH PALM. BEACH PLOIMIC A I I 1000 Source: Figure 3-19, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT A-19 KEY: CORPORATE LIMITS: LAND USE CODE - REF: TABLE 3-11 NORTH PALM BEACH ZONING DISTRICTS RI - Single Family Res. R2 - Multi -Family Res. P - Public ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS Palm Beach Gardens RM/PBG - Medium Density Res. CG-1/PBG - General Commercial GU/PBG - Government Use Palm Beach County RS/PBC - Single Family Res. RM/PBC - Multiple Family Res. EXISTING LAND USE MAP EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES PLANNING AREA 7 11 I i 11i: R C NORTH PA L.M BEACH FLORIDA II - I I 0 200 600 1000 FEET ill 11 11 RM/R: u. RI R2 •o. sw. RI iw la �1. ALUIJ I i 1.4is 11.. PBCii R2 ...2 Source: Figure 3-20, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. '1 EXHIBIT A-20 HISTORICAL RESIDENT POPULATION GROWTH RATES GROWTH PALM BEACH COUNTY NORTH PALM BEACH PERIOD GROWTH RATE (%) GROWTH RATE (%) 1960-1970 110,887 46.6 6,171 215.5 1970-1980 227,756 65.3 2,309 25.6 1980-1981 38,407 6.7 • 49 0.4 1981-1982 22,775 3.7 612 5.4 1982-1983 14,622 2.3 118 1.0 1983-1984 30,076 4.6 169 1.4 1984-1985 30,615 4.5 87 0.8 1985-1986 38,862 5.5 89 0.7 1980-1986 175,357 27.3 1,124 0.6 SOURCE: JLH Associates, 6/87 Source: Table 3-7, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT A-21 CALCULATION OF 1986 MAXIMUM DAY SEASONAL POPULATION LEVELS TYPE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL UNITS Single -Family Detached Multiple Family Units Rental Apartment 435 Condominium 3,698 Hotel/Motel ANALYSIS 2,218 4,133 100 6,451 Units Available for Residency 6,351* Less Units for Sale or Residential Rental** (i.e. vacancy) 133 Less 1986 Resident Households 5,374 5,507 844 Total Residential Units Available for Seasonal Occupancy Hotel/Motel Units 100 Total Season Units 944 Maximum Day Seasonal Population Potential (100% occupancy @ 1.89 persons/unit)*** 1,784 * ** *** Total units less hotel/motel units. Assumed to equal 198'0 rates, as per 1980 Census (i.e. 2.1%) Based upon 6 year analysis of tourist arrivals to Palm Beach County. Combined prorata share of air arrivals at 2.2 persons per party and automobile arrivals at 1.7 persons per party. Source: Table 3-10, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-23 EXHIBIT A-22 VACANT LAND SUMMARY (ACRES) LANDUSE CATEGORY PLANNING RESIDENTIAL (DENSITY) AREA COMMERCIAL LOW MEDIUM HIGH 1 4.00 0 0 0 2 5.53 0 0 0 3 8.50 6.30 0 0.25 4 1.6.7 1.71 0 0 5 1.13 0 0 0.81 6 9.30* 70.58 3.93 25.50 7 0 2.10 0 0 TOTAL 30.13 80.69 3.93 26.56 Total Vacant Land - 141.31 Acres *This figure represents vacant commercial land annexed to the Village in October 1989. Source: Table 3-24, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. npbtbl3.24 EXHIBIT A-23 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PROJECTIONS 1994 Resident Population Growth (1987-94) Resident Dwelling Unit Growth (1987-94) 1,540 (Resident Growth) 2.26 (Average H/H size ) Total Year-round Dwelling Unit Growth (1987-1994) 681 (Resident Unit Growth) 0.80 (Resident Unit Occ. Rate) Distribution of Units by Density Category: Type • 1987-94 Growth Share 2 Growth (Units) Low 0.34 289 Medium 0.04 34 High 0.62 528 Total 1.00 851 Distribution of Landuse By Density Category: 1,540 681 8511 Intensity Factor - Type 1987-94 Units (Units/acre) Acres Low 289 4.03 71.71 Medium 34 10.18 3.34 High 528 21.72 24.31 Totals 851 8.56 3 99.36 Footnotes: 1. Pro rata share of buildout growth potential during 1989-94 period from Table 3-23B 2. Distribution of Residential Buildout Potential, by Unit - type, from Table 3-23A 3. Weighted average of potential densities from vacant land analyses; Tables 3-12 to 3-22 Source: Table 3-25, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. npb tb13.25 _`-lam w L 't1 r 1 i (OAOIAIONn INV1 i) 1311 •IIYYd Al1Y7A110Y/ EXHIBIT B-2 EXISTING MAJOR 44 w w w w N N o CO COCO U U CQ as • a a 2 0 N U to W g4-4 a '.'i r@ r.c)! .rc) tniU , I • ; •A •rl ' 7 '7 Vrg :Id :3 V U o Cam• 4-3 M M M r, nic N N C W Q) 3 A §(i' 3 ) A .� i >% •zri tD`..... N N N 9 44 2 E W— 1 — • ',-4 CO A▪ P.4 4-• ) 4-) 4.0, .2.o Q •'� Qu, w — a P ti , ,_, , . • p4z > ‘,1 '" h ..... 4_, , ,c; 4., z pa 4 r-4 Urn rnv • • Cana •• •• •° . (0 ra z� •� N a aai . cn•,4 a 8 o a) I-4 PA a 'n a 03v CO o(01 8. N '54a a� ao n+� z� �:--M cn+,ao U•rl H▪ = ▪ vi . 4 oIS �� � Li Q U �Yor'ia U a 8 ' a U U a. Q ij C/3 Cu o.9 E. , 7 .3,, 1 i „ ri •• I I I .--1 W v0j. �;' Laoa i .. 1 •tea o • a= F.1 viOM Q € •,1 �- •cn �(0 a 0 r . ,H 0 0 ctf • co O z 4-1 CD 00 0 al > 0 f - 4J Cll N E ✓ � M▪ I 0 EI 4) a) 0 t` T' 0 OO Tr r- o CO .- I -4 CO lD N N lD .--1 CO Fi N O\ v N -� Z In N to N N CD rf1 lD a, o r` .a r- r` N N O0 • to lD 01 01 cr .-I r`'1 N N N rn O O CO N t` a1 l0 O lD r-1 N N N O 0 OD a1 lD 01 l0 N •-I Tr N N N -4 o O u) CO r- to rn1.10 E r-+ - to �j N O O O CO lD r-I CT1 N Q\ 01 t- r1 Q N ▪ z N r- • Tr Q •'-1 O Z r� to m O r- CD a1 a1 to Tr N lD N .-1 O r•1 lD N 01 N r-1 CO O to 01 PIIn rn 0, -4 a1 -4 r- Qt Vft W -4 1 O N .t;� 03 m H N (NI tl) FL • • Ai a• N CT a1 rn N .-d CT CO t.D 0 r- N r-1 .-4 N O a1 .-1 VD Tr r-1 O oor- N r-f r- r- OD Up 0 r- l0 Tr r- r'1C11u1 r-1 o v' co a o u r•) t- .-4 a1 r- to r-1 O ,' N up lD lD O N O r-r-tn O N a1 CT,r co er Tr v' r- Tr Tr •--1 .-1 w0 ..4 o N N O u ON Tr O Q rs COz • r-1 -1 r- r- In CO M Z -4 Q Q Q zzz .11 N rV .-I 01 VD O 0 r-I CO CO CO N N N 01 CO r-1 lD CO lD 0 .-I rn N O 00 lD er r- N lO r'r1 N lD CT r▪ -4 1--- r-4 N rn Tr Q al N z N NOD N z O •--1 Q o Z Ul lDrn N z � Q Z z g4 a Z z z z gt z z Z z Q Q Z z r0 h O lO CO PI 0 Cr1 PI LC1 .-1 r♦ to lO .--1 r't rn N •cf' .--1 .-1 .-4 CO 01 CO lD CT1 .'-4 iD lO N -' r- v' co rn to Q lD Z ra CT N O r--r .--1 ri N r'1 .--I 0 co CO 11507 16205 CO N N CO toll N r-1 CO V 0 m to in 0 1.0 Q Q Z z N N TT la o O N N 0) $i 0 s 0 CO 0 H M <<U •¢ as WCaU 403 a 0 rn Nmm Kr NN VD OD LDr-th c' Kr r• lf1 Ul f7 O CO w N Lf) 000 O 00 ••-1CDCD CD0CD 000 o CD CD 000 000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O►O,O er O\ O\ ererer sr Kra .i .-r o r- rA r- r• r` r` rN N r` tD 10 v .-I VD VD 4 .-I ri .-1 r-4 .-1 PI rl ,4 er Q' .-1 m co C' O M O O1 .D CO O .-i Lf) e) O O -.4 d' N 'O(DO1 Oh CV ("4 r- ul c'1 ''O1Lf) N N N ffl N r-1 r-1 rA • 1VE ,c)13 il '4 'O 'a 'D 'D 'ch .V .� .� .r � ,.-1 ”A> .,.5 O D a D O aaa a a r` co w VD VD er N MD LD N N N N N N ' O• N LD Q) >tW MMO aaa as °' 21 0 CD :° � " 'F 'II 1) 2 :fp cm rnm�° "' asa $ ' a+d � a as •+)a • a -rg ro�� °' ° oB a a C° a> ° a� �+ �I > • 7'a . il 1,4..4 yy vow ��• '.a''a o�� .� .k x ns ww <M. a� g a ��• • w W www www �,�>, 40.5 0 0 U tn 0 000 000 cncn 2W c1ZZ 3W3 'g' r� a o rY $.$$.4 0 ,-4 'U i0� c. �n.ari, om m v) N $ v iLt ww ti J-,a,), 0am) t•..ao 1Vwwi 000 >p�N-"� �s= gC a, O N 8O rA r fn to cn fT 'a) aaa can 2 aka °' r •r•1 1, m w 4)) a 1 Y .-4N N CV N N r- .-4 1 .-i 0 a d HV I I r 1 1 I r O .-I - . -I '-1 O 0 00 00 CO CO OD CO CO * * * * * * • .--I N N N N N N N* * * * * * * `.•.• U 05 N z O 0 s) QQQ 0 >g cn 6u) m a Cc. 43 O Q CO gC N (*) VD CM LD 0 d' m' CN N f- et' mr `Q N tf) U) m' O 01 '.D N Lfl rn • • • • • • • • • • • • 000 O 00 CD CD 000 -.4 .-I O 10 r-I r- VD VD VD VD VD VD N N 0 VD I- N VD VD VD VD VD VD Ul Lfl VD Lfl Ul to U) Ul tf) Lfl Ul Ul U) U) th .-•I • Ul U) .-4 .-1 ,...4 .-'I v-i .-4 N 0 kD eN O VD Ul m O Lfl to Ul Lfl 0 .--I N 0 ep ('1 N O .-I O) N ("1 d' I- O1 .--i N VD et' 0 ef' CO Ul NNN MN ri.-IrA 1131313 3 '0 ED bV Va, 'O,3 'O J1> fo'D� >>> S-?•� -r4 coo a C:10 ODD Da0 VD VD eT N VD VD N N N N N N gC eig4 N YYY Daa B as UU)Ui en vim) ' cow— ii •� 4.1 g ul c0E ri a 0 — W Q al 69 ox N .winCUB ..4;" pll (0' g N w 0 0 a) .° waZiy ° N .Z' ▪ N 2Lm GQ ,?. . Z ro 0• ,y tr) r-i 0 0 aw 4-i ti-' x, 44 4., 4-1 44444, 0 0 O U) 0 000 000 )cn Ea vW C1ZZ 3 W3 aaa • • .-i .a ?'a L E N sa •s• - >. >, >1 r+ r+ Cz+ LE O M O 33ro3 M ) •V; aia)O C)U)U) x 4 0 0 0 D0'rn a(o ZZ I'llaa a� is # Ic - .-•i N N N N N 0 N LD Is- O• V'VD 0 .--I .-4 .-4 .-I 0 0 O O 00 O CO OD O - -K -k - N N N N N N N• *- •Ic peaking characteristic to 1989 rn co rn U) r 0 w U GU r-A a 0 z 4-i OWN N O 0 01 M <<W u ° M�t'lo H v's!'rn Q . • • p; 000 3 Q aQ P:4 ca CCIQ sr N .-1 1.11 N CD. --I CT\ N VD CO U N VD [� VD sr N VD M • • • • . • • • • O O O O O O O O O O 00o O CD CD 0000 000 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 ONCh0 srCnCh ON NO d'd'�' •-, .-a CD r i 1.4 0 r— r- 0 r- N r� lD VD sr r-I VD 1D sr N N sr'-4i ,4 .-a OD d' lD lf1 sr N Ul VD Q1 Col lD M Al OsrLO M 00 0100NN OOtnO r-Q1N VD PI •-I.00MM 01C-M lD VD CO sr Ul lD CD VD sr CD VD N N M ,A M N N CV .-4 .-1 rI vVV vD N N VvvVV ri@ VV V -(4 -,4 > V VV •' �•;•� Ste' a •r.l •r-1 •ri .� -� c DOD o 0 0 a o a a 0 a a 1DVDs!' N 1DlD Ulelrl Ul NNN DDM DD a) en OV a 4O-► FU1 • G •ri tT 0 CI) CI x � '- 0e* r� O N (� 4 g. RI .yew o oE 1 2 .'ri'm a)lr:4 4,2 �y4, A. ,c4 itsZ0 •-cMM KC '0 a ��� cn 4 UU r4 4414444 V2 cn 0� 44444444 444444 cncn 2a WU ZZZ 3w2222 • • rp • • • .-I r-I • -I w Ls+ Q Q 'gra al www 11 lin . . . 4 O 0 O O DD ZZ° a 44111 * * N lD r-0 O 1 'NTVD Co .--1 r-i ri .--1 O O * * * * OD CO OD CO OD OD OD * * is N N N N N N N* *** Table 4-6. 4 0 idP U) lD cn •• rn U) ••-I fij co a A pW m.-ri ,_, (-, r1 4_, ,_, 0 m,__, I ra w trl g i}� 40 co U QM � •' .i 'Q CLI igm 9"4 1 qa b a• §4a4 N ..v) a a a rn ca co 0 D 0 b1 •cA U ? N •9 a•9 o� r-4 (0 r-i (0r-+ 0 0.r1 a r-� (a ar4 a . Q .,4 to 7, � -1 ..2a45.J • ) N a) 44 . •,� v-wro .N Nt O to �a ° DIU ,t' N -r- I) > - O •r-i CP .Q O (n• I I I E-I Q a v ,cliH�-, as 0 * * .-. O * * * A - 3 1 s oV §I << w WQ WWUQ aGUQ toMla •--i M1/40 0 Mtf)•--I o- MN to Cf'N M 1/40'' MMNM 041/40M • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 r-1 .--1 0 0 0 ,-1 0 0 000 000 0 00 0000 000 000 0 00 ONTO 000 Ql Ol O ' ' Ql Ql O N N O Q' •C}' fit' 1-4•-•1 0 r- •-.4 r-i 0 t— t— O N r t- l0 1/40 mot' r•4 1/40 l0 ¢7' N N 'IT r-I .-i r-4 1-1 00 Ol C %0 l0 lfl 0O M N M04,4 N ON M ,:r M U 10 v-4 0, ,0101 N MT!' rA O to to O Ql M `a7'NO N MM MN00 IJ1010 MNtfl N MN MNNN •--i 1/40 I N N � N N 'FM '�U � TM � H V V i> H � � v � > - � -� •r4 :r-4 : -I Ca Ca GI O LILT aaaa aaa g -c co 10 10 et' N 10 10 tf) M M to N N N m l0 v• -5 .4 0aa as rC6 a,•� 2 g r1 16 Et, 4 0 rn 0 • —• •i) •• • 4• 9-1 r-1 •r1 4 'o a, 4-1to a) roro 4) V o to r-1 •ri 4 'r� CI r-i OOoO O r+4 j"0 1 1:4) 4d ttp. "' s 4., • cn .� a a) a a a �a• aaan �� oa on Aa o, ►44-1 o o•249 zro a, - a„' ' a �I u�i 4-1 as �J'"o, •131 0 0 u) • ,tom .5z •LIB O� 'r1 0 > t.} R -ri v V •• 0 !Z .,4 •.� A� O tr z.4c `° 4-1 0 • as.0 CO r, r13rs i''Y'g •-I :m: 1714? g-olg 44 4� • 4-4 I 4-1 44 44 4-44a 4-1 44> rt a� 0 o •Ucn 0 0000 000 �' a�A c • U)U) MI 4.1 3W3 �i aV .-1 0 V W > Q, t4toXoo =1 .--, U •�• • r-i 4-10 • v ra r-i r� L� ri o 1�-1 's-i U •�-1 CII -64 CO CO CL) a) B" t 1 •i t 1 (h) gi ci)) ck. otq, v. • . o0oto rn 0' rn 0,uu • •• •• z 0 o f-1 !-1 3-1 t• i al •. I 1 1 aaa CO zz wawa ► min '0 ri 44 * a)-'-40 oo 5' •-•1 r-t N NN NN iH•-{ Q0 )t O N 1/40 t�M �'10 0 •--1 r-1 r-•4 •-I 0 0 * * * * .ic CO CO CO 0 M 0 M * * * * * it N N N NN NN* * •Ic * * •K 4J 0 0 w 0 a • Cs) �0D � rn O z 4-4 CO O O N -� • U al O O ctl I 4J 40 (00 E-1 A a) O Tenure EXHIBIT C-1 COMPARATIVE HOUSING TENURE CHARACTERISTIC, 1980 Palm Beach North Palm County Beach Tenure by Race and Spanish -Origin of Householder Total Year-round Housing units 286,784 \ 5,742 Year-round occupied housing units . . . 234,339 4,761 Owner -occupied 171,771 3,891 Percent owner -occupied 73.3 81.7 White 160,456 3,870 Black . . . :: . . . . . . . . . .. 9,963 2 Other 1,352 19 Spanish Origin 4,375 43 Renter -occupied 62,568 870 Percent renter -occupied 1 26.7 21.2 White 48,200 868 Black 13,099 2 Other 1,287 0 Spanish Origin 3,287 28 Vacancy Status Vacant year-round housing units 52,259 946 For Sale only 5,022 41 For Rent 6,134 55 Held for occasional use 26,587 661 Other vacant 14,516 189 Boarded -up 752 0 Vacant seasonal units 9,066 35 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980. Source: Table 5-3, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. Gross Rent EXHIBIT C-2 MONTHLY GROSS RENT OF RENTER -OCCUPIED UNITS, 1980 Dwellings Dwellings Palm Beach County North Palm Beach $ 0 - $ 99 2,054 0 $100 - $149 4,325 5 $150 - $199 7,550 11 $200 - $249 9,313 27 $250 - $299 9,736 133 $300 - $399 13,939 347 $400 and more 10,921 287 No Cash Rent 3,669 53 To.taI 61,507 863 Median ($) 279 364 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau•of the Census, 1980. RENT -TO -INCOME RATIO FOR RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS, 1980 Rent -to Income Ratio Less than 20 % 20% - 24% 25% - 34% 35% or more Not computed Less than $5000 0 Income Range (%) $5000- $10,000- $15,000- $20,000+ 9999 14,999 19,999 or more Total 5 10 17 206 238 0 0 0 61 54 115 •0 5 83 45 29 162 102 69 71 27 11 280 27 15 7 12 7 68 TOTAL 129 94 171 162 307 863 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980. Source: Tables 5-4A and 5-4B, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-34 Value EXHIBIT C-3 VALUE OF OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING, 1980 Dwellings Dwellings Palm Beach County North Palm Beach Non -Condominium Units Less than $ 10, 0� 0 967 0 $ 10,000 - $ 19,999 3,680 14 $ 20,000 - $ 29,999 7,983 18 $ 30,000 - $ 39,999 13,366 64 $ 40,000 - $ 49,999 14,738 167 $ 50,000 - $ 79,999 32,216 750 $ 80,000 - $ 99,999 8,814 277 $100,000 - $149,999 8,865 350 $150,000 and more 7,089 238 Total 97,538 units 1,878 units Median ($) 57,482 77,000 Condominium 51,065 units 1,600 units SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980. MONTHLY OWNER COSTS OF OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS, 1980 Mortgage Status and Selected Monthly Owner Costs Palm Beach County North Palm Beach Owner -occupied housing units With a mortgage Less than $100 $100 to $149 $150 to $199 $200 to $249 $250 to $299 $300 to $349 $350 to $399 $400 to $449 $500 to $599 $600 to $749 $750 or more TOTAL Median ($) Not Mortgaged Less than $50 $ 50 to $ 74 $ 75 to $ 99 $100 to $149• $150 to $199 $200 to $249 $250 or more TOTAL Med'i an ($) • 171,771 655 2,330 5,202 5,945 6,878 1 7,251 6,269 5,385 7,362 5,982 6,173 66,894 384 1,865 10 20 112 167 219 118 197 105 200 180 154 1622 406 2,242 0 5,653 21 6,742 23 8,527 77 3,293 67 1,573 38 2,153 17 30,183 243 102 150 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980. OWNER COST -TO -INCOME RATIO FOR OWNER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS, 1980 Owner Cost - to -Income Ratio Less than $5000 Income Range (%) $5000- $10,000- $15,000- $20,000+ 9999 14,999 19,999 or more Total Less than 20 % 5 16 85 102 1007 1215 20% - 24% 8 20 23 39 139 229 25% - 34% 0 21 34 47 107 209 35% or more 54 32 63 33 21 203 Not computed 19 0 0 0 0 19 TOTAL 86 89 205 221 1274 1875 SnoPrE: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980. Source: Tables 5-5A, 5-5B and 5-5C, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT C-4 COMPARATIVE AGE OF YEAR-ROUND HOUSING UNITS, 1980 Year Built Number of Units Palm Beach North Palm County Beach Year-round housing units 286,784 5,742 1979 to March 1980 31,017 204 1975 to 1978 47,108 394 1970 to 1974 75,489 1,834 1960 to 1969 66,651 2,672 1950 to 1959 37,841 585 1940 to 1949 13,897 13 Before 1940 14,781 4 Owner -occupied housing units . . . • 171,751 3,891 1979 to March 1980 15,054 38 1975 to 1978 29,576 205 1970 to 1974 47,601 1,121 1960 to 1969 42,030 2,046 1950 to 1959 24,140 473 1940 to 1949 6,374 8 Before 1940 6,976 0 Renter -occupied housing units . . • 62,588 870 1979 to March 1980 3,139 18 1975 to 1978 7,583 51 1970 to 1974 14,443 270 1960 to 1969 16,295 454 1950 to 1959 9,745 72 1940 to 1949 5,755 5 Before 1940 5,628 0 SOURCE: U.S. Bureau.of the Census, 1980. Source: Table 5-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT D1-1 PALU BEACH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER SERVICE AREAS 0 Beach Florida to of North CO W� cs 0 r J r--1 -r� O 0 I •r1 • cti 4J O E br O wQ a) 0 •O*JNC[s LIM. INC.3/•• A-37 • V ATLANTIC 05 1• o f' Nji- 1. _ 0 ..tom. v1 (_ / `,-..._s 0 -J I- !- aw W �__.....w. OCEAN All010O ,W0N311 0 u cc 3 cc m J 0 Q-r fV al •rd e-• •ri L S-I 0 E+ � H (s_, H r, U Q) tti Cri 4-•J • O CO Za 4-4 N N rci O r-I U CV 0 I •H E b-1 U •� O w Q [•� 0 SEACOAST UTILITIES 0 1800 5400 SCALE IN FEET 1 1 l Li IMO 1 1 1 EXHIBIT D1-3 WASTEWATER PLANTS & SERVICE AREAS us~y O C E A N t ANte CC2 nth 0 a - FLORIDA' ift/*/(‘/ .„, Ie u a PROPOSED S.R. 7 MI i I NM s BOUNDARY W I= 4 — SERVICE PATTERNS INDICATE AREAS CURRENTLY SERVED SOURCE: LRM, Inc., 2/89 4J O • CA r 0 0 a4 4J �rn 000 z o' 14-4 0 • .Q r1 r-1 U •�+ O M o iV co *I -I 0 wQ 0 C1) 'PI rA al rti w U c>i W E r-1 rti 4J P 0 z 0 . rn CO 01 a) a) (o r--1 4-) r-I U •H 0 o LAD -I-• ) a) (i) e LT U •r O w Q a) O SOLID WASTE EXHIBIT D2-1 GENERATION/COLLECTION 1987 Non -Res. + Multi Family Trash Garbage Month (lbs) (lbs) Single Family Trash Garbage (lbs) (lbs) Total Trash (lbs) Garbage (lbs) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Tons TYPE 191,640 118,100 163,500 144,480 161,060 264,940 281,540 188,880 146,440 162,700 271,900 197,940 2,293,120 1,146.6 612,780 794,020 647,100 686,160 593,200 539,700 540,000 542,860 663,800 606,800 561,680 607,940 7,396,040 3,698.0 SINGLE FAMILY (Tons/yr) 310,984 311,490 173,713 167,900 240,678 364,410 537,655 269,022 363,339 338,764 402,834 327,165 3,807,954 1,904.0 625,560 684,698 996,701 794,134 765,900 760,768 485,143 671,776 693,244 854,098 594,129 656,624 8,582,775 4,291.4 TOTALS SUMMARY (TONS) COMM + MULTI FAMILY (Tons/yr) 502,624 429,590 337,213 .312,380 401,738 629,350 219,195 457,902 509,779 501,464 674,734 525,105 6,101,074 3,050.54 1,238,340 1,478,718 1,643,801 1,480,294 1,359,100 1,300,468 1,025,143 1,214,636 1,357,044 1,460,898 1,155,809 1,264,564 15,978,815 7,989.41 TOTAL (Tons/yr) Trash Garbage Total 1,904.0 4,291.4 6,195.4 1,146.6 3,698.0 4,844.6 3,050.6 7,989.4 11,040.0 Source: Table 6.2-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT D2-2 PERMANENT RESIDENT/SEASONAL UNIT PROJECTIONS TYPE 1987 1994 1995 1999 Single Family Occupied 2180 2465 2498 2498 Seasonal 28' 32 33 33 Multi -Family Occupied 3250 3683 3731 3731 Seasonal 816 924 936 936 EQUIVALENT POPULATION PROJECTION BY RESIDENTIAL UNIT TYPE OCCUP. HSHLD PERM. SEAS. HSHLD EQUIV.* YEAR TYPE UNITS SIZE POP UNITS SIZE PERM. POP TOTAL 1987 SF 2180 3.050 6649 28 3.050 43 6692 MF 3250 1.665 5411 816 1.665 679 6090 • 1994 SF 2465 3.050 7518 32 3.050 49 7567 MF 3683 1.665 6132 924 1.665 769 6901 1995 SF 2498 3.050 7619 33 3.050 101 7720 MF 3731 1.665 6212 936 1.665 779 6991 1999 SF 2498 3.050 7619 33 3.050 101 7720 MF 3731 1.665 6212 918 1.665 779 6991 *Equivalent Perm. Residents: 2 seasonal residents = 1 permanent. VILLAGE SOLID WASTE GENERATION PROJECTIONS 1987 1994 1995 1999 TYPE USE LOS TONS/YR TONS/YR TONS/YR TONS/YR SF -Res. 0.926 6195 7007 7149 7149 tons/cap/yr MF 0.588 3579 4058 4111 4111 tons/cap/yr Non -Res. 6.0 1266 1335 1359 1359 tons/acre/yr Restaurant/ 2621 2621 2621 2621 Contract Haulers Totals 13661 15021 15240 15240 Source: Tables 6.2-2, 6.2-3 and 6.2-4, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. 0 U • • ow 'D3 113V3H H"ldd 133 Ariatati 2 CC 0 t n� O BEACH COUNTY DRAINAGE BASINS a. EXHIBIT D3-1 0 • • U1 cd rd 0 rH U cd a) E r-I cd a �rn 000 z� 0 a) a) c o ✓ —I U • r1 0 O I •H Cn 4-1 . fd E b7 •r4 0 • C::) U 0 A-43 �1 I• EXHIBIT D3-2 A N Y.il e ,,,,,/,...... . / l ****** ' f:' II $4.111 7 • ♦ /� •� am�{lnnud 1 I • 1. • 4Vti��� c • c .{ .. O C O C 7 4, S • el csom • v ` 0= a`a`aaao Wi GO.... .ar c c 0000 e c c c c c • a 000ato N t / 1: yy II wools. r N ,!{!{{,L` �1 sly ali1.1 { rf8nnn 11 I I•e amtaytit V 0 w(15 U a) (El a 4J ZQ 4-1 o� a)o ✓ 4J HO U O EXHIBIT VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH DRAINAGE AREAS 4) a) 0 U ) a� C: C 1) 1 •r1 CT •r4 C £ •,.I U r1 4) u) ro ro�aCL 14 3 CI U N 0 4) -- V 4J •r4 N (11U 0 a a) N WV N .0 0 •-. C ••-1 U -.4--4 0 U) C U 0 U -'-I Private Drainage On -site Drainage and Retention X>CXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX>CXXXXXXXXXXX>CXX 1.-- .v' to v N (n Co vCOCot0NNm.-1inintovinu1toCO in Anvtf1inIs- 000Co IN 01 tf1t!1 U1 v v U1 NI. r1 .-1 N Cr V' (+1 1 1 1 N r-1 .-•1 r-1 N .-1 •-1 r-1 r•1 .-1(. 1 N r-1 .-1 (Ni .-1 in .-I 1 •-1 .-i ra .-1 (NI N r-1 .-1 CO CO CO N .-I •-I ri N CO COvCOCOt0r vto.-I intf1tf1•d'tototoCo tf1tf1vtotot`000CQif) 011f1v vtf) •1 .-1 •-4 N d' 'Cr r`•1 N N (V1 N r-1 r-I .-1 N r••I .-1 .-1 .-1 .-1 r-I N .-•1 ri N ri m . 4 N r•1 .--I .•-1 r-( N N •-I r•1 r•1 N . v to .-1 a`I r1 V' to .-1 N (n1 v' to tO I,. CO .-1 N (r1 v to .-1 N ('•1 v to ri N v to t0 1-- U O N O CO CO N O U (- t0 t0 tf1 lf1 t0 to CO ON 01 as a. a-, al 01 a ra r-1 .-1 r-I Z N4ta£Z0 a a acn H h >• .s as m as U a '¢ r-i N N N N (r) f•l 1•1 ("1 (r) v �' v 4.4 1•-• U 0 r/ U) al of 44 N W +�•ri G C7 N 44 0 N r-i 44 1•L 44 0 • v �+ 4JP4 Ca ri b v = 0 • ▪ 41 0 N 1 0 R4a 4-' 0 4•i el •ri O iv Ld i-1 U R aa) MI 01 4-1 1'v �� a4 a uJ)� 0 0 Gl L 01 iU �Q> al LA 411 > 44 1 0 'V 44 1d 0 - a con >t X >c X X X>4 >t >4 X X >C >C >c >4 x x X x >i X X >c X >4 >C x X >4 0 Florida U O O N O 1- M O VDnJ to Ln el 01 'a el ri N CO CO 00 Ln Ln N ri Lll CO N M CO OD tO M CO ri m V' ri r-i 1 1 1 1 N 1 ri r♦ ri r♦ ri r-1 N P4 ri ri 1 ri ri ri l ri N 1 N in Ln Ln a' Lr1 v CO Q• r-1 •-i ri N r♦ N ri N E c▪ � a LntnOONOr-i1sOOCDO UlUl r4ul00NL"103CDVDO00r♦r4 �) ririell+1 Q'elNNri•-iri.•iririC4e-lr-i•-1t'1ri.-irimr-INQN CO Ofs z4-1 0 r4040Q'LnririNrir♦N riNLh'V'LnVONriNriNel V'tor-iri Q} rQ • O fii r4 r1 0 va co cc) m co a• m O O m 0all to •rl Ln to to tll to w N Ln V3 VD Ln c a) • •• tT an cn an C 1-4 ,4 r♦ ri r♦ r-j u) U r-( r-1 ri ri a a :4 CQ U A W Ei >C Cu c9 ]C a D > 3 if Iti E r--i .fQ U (13 O al 4 CO m x N Q• to to to 4!1 to tO '.O tO va r r N N 0 0 0) 0 $$30 b400 • 1 Nl I P: I 2! IL. ..... SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT D4-1 ATLANT,G PROPOSED S.R. 7 WN F-H <— cc 2 7, ao eo — — — — t s.t MI MI MI = .! F- x -J 0 cc O 0 0 RICHARD ROAD PLANT t - A EJD N iht W cc W U cc W N 1- Z J d W H J 1- 0 4 t W • N 4) CI) tti 1.0 ▪ U a) a) .4-) • O co z� 0 U N fti 0 � U .r{O a) U 0 C!) A-47 I- 1,t o 10 .o,• z rLnNriC l,I n "f> J �j t/1 o ��_I ---Cril,-.4 .- � �.. ELLISON A 1 1CTNTRAL 0 0 cr l7 0 on. M 1 WIl SON Ocf.AN PROSPERITY U 0 I /LO RIDA'S o 0 Z W O_ OC 0 O J W PROPOSED S R. 7 NI w ICI c, 5 MILT TA RY TURNPIKE • TRAIL Ism 1 • • rimoAwNM Y 1 1 wwIII NI wrli r!� • Q TREATMENT PLANT LEVEL STORAGE 0 z 0 cc TREATMENT FACILITIES Q 4 SEACOAST UTILITIES EXHIBIT co IJ z SOURCE: LRM, 0 rr�^ CI) •I-1 0 0 N PO CC r-•i a O • 0o z� O N-N al0 .-I • r-+ O M • O I •ri � 4J • (j LO 4-3 b'• O • r1 0 w Q a) 0 Florida Support 0 Ri E �-i cd • o00 z(3) 0 (I) a) A al O r-I U 0 N O I ri in • ci a) a) • E O 0 iT U -r-1 0 w Q a; 0 O cct O U (Es a) E a �rn 4co o� z oa▪ ) (1)o 4J rti U r-1 0 • a) 0 • • cn (Ts rcl 0 al a) E r--I �rn 0 2 0aw a)0 cd 0 0 M I ro N4J a) a) E tn U •,-I 0 w Q ai 0 Marina Lotts Brothers (North Lake) Bassett Boat Co. (Earman River) North Palm Bch. Marina (ICWW) Old Port Cove Marina (Lk. Worth) Anchorage Park Marina (NPBWW) EXHIBIT E-3 MARINAS AND BOATING FACILITIES Capacity 19 wet slips 111 indoor storage spaces 110 wet slips 300 wet slips . 33 wet slips 185 dry storage spaces Services fuel pump facili- ties, bait and tackle fuel ties fuel ties fuel ties pump facili- pump facili- pump facili- boat ramp Ownership privately -owned public facility privately -owned public facililty privately -owned public facility privately -owned public facility publicly -owned residents only SOURCE: Village of North Palm Beach Public Services Department, 1987. Source: Table 7-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT E-4 HURRICANE EVACUATION PLAN FOR STORM SURGE VULNERABLE ZONES Zone Boundaries 5 South of Seminole Blvd., east of ICWW to U.S. #1 (east of U.S. 1 to Earman River Canal, west of Atlantic Ocean 6 South of Earman River Canal, east of U.S. #1, north of Silver Beach Road/ Lake Worth Inlet, west of Atlantic Ocean 28 South of PGA Blvd., east of Florida Turnpike north of Blue Heron Blvd., west of U.S. #1, south to Northlake Blvd., west to Inter- state I-95. 29 South of PGA Blvd., east of 1-95, north of Northlake Blvd., west of U.S. #1. Route Assignment PGA Blvd., west to Mili- tary Trail (809), south to Holly Drive, east to shelter, 4245 Holly Drive Blue Heron Blvd., west to Military Trail (809) north to Holly Drive, east to shelter, 4245 Holly Drive Shelter Palm Beach Gardens High School Palm Beach Gardens High School NOT IN STORM SURGE VULNERABLE ZONE. NOT IN STORM SURGE VULNERABLE ZONE. Source: Table 7-4, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT G-1 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FACILITIES FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES a>4 rd r-♦ b • a) N 0 tr • '•N A'd rd U) z •-.1 r4 'd -► N a) 4-1 W •r-1 rd 0 r4 a) 0 a) 4i ,4 4) O )-1 O td .i O . .l cn c• n w to A to X U ft •� q r-I-IHrd>• •� rel UO),•N,4 g Iv rr4 . o 4 •N rd N 4 4i •0 r-1 .[ 'd •r1 a) r► 93 a) al ,-.4 v b 3 A N r-1 0 tT -� co •r1 4-1 :n .c a) t7' •r1 r-1 r-1 C' r-1 r-1 t3n •r1 t) r-1 a) f ,.4J 0 ti°�a) •• � 3w N--0 0 O U) .1-) ri M • •r1 N ► - . r...l rd ► .1.J -1) a) a) N U) O '-I .. rd a) N O al 4.J U) -- 4.1 .0 rd A 4-) a) 4-) r-1 a) A N N A r-+ +) .0 a) N 3-1 tT 0 O O 0 a) a) 4-1 tT N 0 4J O -r1 0 3 0 r-1 0 •ri O •r1 .L'i 0 0 a) w C) 4..) U O O. 44 U) r-1 .1J U 4-1 Ri 1 1 1 1 1 a) a) > • > •r1 a) •rl U) a) > +) U) •r>1 .N 4 W ' 4.) co t) b 4 a >1 •r1 O O 0 U Country Club r•1 Neighborhood, 2-_- Osborne Park a) •r-4 A U Neighborhood, ► co U) a) r-1 4.) a u r1 N 0 •r1 Mt A U) r-1 U) cn • •l) rd O •N rd 44 a) 3 N rd r-I A a) UU)4-1 ) 4�. 00 04 *---•b' 3 b N rd •ri inC.) 'CI L�y •rri O .0 4-) a) r-1 A t) a) co 'd el A C.)N •ri .--1M U1 0 tT N O r~ tT N 0 4-) b • r1 t) a) •r1 4-1 A a) b r-1 r•1 4-1 r-1 N a) O o 3 H'd OO 0 . • A 4-1 b •r 1 rd a) U •r-1 E1 >, O r-i .Q N ▪ N (0 >t 1-1 A .-d 'd (1) b -- •r-I a) 4) 'd b r-1r4•d 0 • N N a) a) r 4 r-I O L." 4.) 0 •ri o RI 0 •r1 0 0 3 a) O a) .l rn 0 O 4-1 > 0 4J 4J r-1 o4 EA r-1 rd 1 21) •ri U) a) U) > RI •r-I a co cn a 4) •r1 0 0 U rd rd a) w a a O 0 F m a) > > M a) r-1 tD Ca ,4 t!1 • >1 01 r-1 r1 r-i r-1 rd b •r{ •ri A N N rd rt1 a a (Continued) EXHIBIT FACILITIES/ACTIVITIES Neighborhood, W 0 • 1 r-I O 4 0 R) N tT • • •1 N 0 --1 a) 1-1 Q, :1 •• b A.0 0 b 44 4-a b' d ro$4 O ' Iil -,-1 -4'el▪ d) d • •ri -,-1U . rd N d \ rd.-1 -a) 0 .0 4) cdr-1A N A 0 4 • w 0 EnN a�-1 nd 14 0 - N O • CO ▪ 'd • • .0 N a) 0 4 - O 0 a) .0 N 4-i • a) x a) (T •� • O r-i 0 • A --I • )4 3 a) 4J b •r1 r-'1 3 r-I N to r-I d .0 •d A >t 4-) 4.1 al •r-1 O b' O 44 .i.) a) Aril H .. -'d N� 0 -'d'd X � 0 0 r-1 ...0 1.1 •-4 v -1 b E A a) a) N en- -X id -.--1d -1 ' it O 4-.) 0 •r1 al •d r 4 ••-1 O d 0 a) 14 0 •r-I O V A rI a) A MI 1d x is 0 3 I 1 1 4 1 a) •ri 0 Neighborhood, a) a) -r-1 .N •r.1 •N .1-1 N -P U) O rd 0 (d 4 a, .4: a, b a) — a w ate) a) 'l a: CD CDO N O O a) O $o a) u•1 a) M (1) O Ci - r • N kD ▪ a) O ▪ a) O • >> Ca (Z) a H H >141 >1 • 1-1 N >r(d H .--1 r'-I r-i -ri 1) '-1 r--1 r1 3-1 L... W W Id a w z Lakeside 6. Alamanda Park Senior Citizen's North Palm Beach CO r- co Ql Village of North Palm Beach Recreation Department, 0 • CI1 r0 M 0 r-1 W 0 a) E ro a • co a1 0 2 i • 4-1 N 0 4 0 N -P • 0 (ti 0 0 cd 1 rn � N E r-1 � .Q 0 «i 0 E•1Q 0 0 O A-55 EXHIBIT G-3 "ACTIVE" FACILITIES JURISDICTION . 1n N(d N , N N N N U1 (d td N u) 0 r4 •d •,l U • A A U U 4-) •CI -1-)N U N •.4 n1 co • U •rl (d • C. •r-I 44 rd ••-1 r-1 O •rl (d 4-1 N •r1 O 0 U uI 4 rd U u1 0 O N U w U$ a) 4 tr a) U U 0 u1 •!-I m q N a U U 0 N O (d •rl a) O v •,-1u a) .� Id A DUI...-1O •.-4• an a) cn '�u) b 44 A u) O •(d •C r•4 •d O 0 • d 0 44 4 •r1 r1 11-1 3 ^ 0 44 al N . (d ^ 0 (d .1-) m • 4.) a) to 1 4) ^ I • ..'' •N N ^ 44 Ur --I r� >1 N 1-1 >1 cn 4� U H0 O .....•4j •-, _ a, a) O O o a 9 a) ri (d a) a) r�l N O M a1 a) N N A •rl G' U A g U) A O r1 C, Cn r-1 .--1 O L:. O E-( O H Ei ( r1 C• r O MI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ^^ • O OO Palm Beach County a) O z Beach County DuBois Park N 1n N a) r4 • •r1 (o N U 0. $1 .r1 E 4) G. U N a).[: •r.i • 11 U a) p. a) •n '1 N U a) 4 u a) a) O 4) 44 •.1 : N .n •rl O w al.— N g in U1 b, r4 4 1 rd CO U► a) n O a) £ }.1 •r1 -P U ••-1 Urd N OO rat O a) In DUI •r{ A ••1 4 a N r•i •.i .-. 44 E O C 44rn ^ V rd ,.... ^ d• • I 4) r-i " r-4 4 ) >1 V1 r-1 w v v 41 {) v CU IA (,•' }� )4 (I) 0 a) o to N W H O W O 41 00 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 >, >1 4J 4) 0 0 U .g .c: U N rd a) a) co c12 r� « rd ai a, 1n '1 (Continued) re) EXHIBIT to 41 H Er H a H U FC t+, H E+ JURISDICTION 141 • 11) rI N •r4 Q) N N N rd .4J i-1 U a) a) a) • r{ aJ N C.' •r1 t~ a-) •ri N U .Li rd a ri U 0 id al 4.1 U � a) 4-1 0 •r1 •ri A O ul O 0 A a) a) +J grd r-I N N a) •ri U -d O U 5 rd ,c 00 . . tit rd a) • N KJ Cl. r-1 rod Q, U • rd •rr1 • 1_.•g U N • •.U•i N •d • U -a -,-1A b ••-I •U1 U U ul t1, A 44 tr rrdd O N A tr 44 at O 0r'1 a) U A 0r1 NiOAaN rd N cn N 4-1 U ••-I O U 44 •ri U O rd 4-1 A rd O 44 rd A rI N r-I r I N U r-1 ri r-I r-I O E+ O O a. N O 0 0 0 11 1 I I I I I I I 1 4; 1.4 0N) .-44J ax) 0 U -N N g rd H O A 0 • r 1 a En N U 0 in O rd a) +) ul Cr, •ri r-i 4.1 a rd d 4-1In r-I 4-14-1 N •0 ll 4J 4J .H •rrdd ►a r-1 A CU • N •cr• N .. r. r, aJ r. {J N r♦ N N N--- W ... . O U g O O U g 0 A A O 4, 3O- O E4 2 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 Palm Beach County Juno Park N tot lots. r-1 N N Juno.Beach Park CO r., • r-1 O CD CO 01 CU O r i M F+ O 1mcn0 O II II 1 I• b 1i N a)A +J •On44 O 0 41 U • 0 rd N • u1 O 0 A 0 'd •rl rI •r1 4 •ri 4J U r:: D 4-1 0 1-3 •q N-- N r-i r-I a) N r1 U �..� b U 0140 0 0 `�E 0 1 I 1 1 Beach County rd a Bert Winters Park al A-58 (Continued) EXHIBIT JURISDICTION f43 z acres of M la O 0 O 0 0 o a W O %.r O O r 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 4.) 4.) r{ r- r� 0 Palm Beach County Phil Foster Park • 0 m 0 Palm Beach County Ocean Reef 00 O1 r-1 Beach County Parks rd a a 0 En 0 • rcl 0 0 (ES al cci a4 co • 0• .�l 0) 0 z 4-I O -Q O O U cc'0 .. O .4-) (NI CZ I 4-) a1 � O N E -Q O ccs 0 Hla U 0 cn A-59 EXHIBIT G-4 DISCOUNTED STANDARDS OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS Ca z RECREATION N W a E-1 CL4 z Q C9 E r-1 Z W E1 H Ca Z U) � a U CO CO N N U) U) a) a) U U Rf R7 Ln Lfl CV N 0 0 S-I4-1 0 •r-1 A G tr E -r1 E (1)0 Z RECREATION AREA rD r-1 a) -ri 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4-1 r♦ 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I U) V) U) U) U) U) U) 0) O to 4, 'O b -P u) +� riaaa) 94 •ri E 0 G 0 a) a) a) E r-1 r0 0 0 0 0 0 -ri •r1 O W O U) 1-1 .0 Q.+ U U U 4-1 44 0 00 U -zr w • ▪ Ul N al r1 fl 1!') N N e* C' ('4 V' N • co d' 1 - r--1 U) (1) U) (1) U) U) N U) N 4-1 a) U) 0) 0) 4-) A a- ► U) . •-a 0 r-i Q.r Q+ Q) ri (CI $-1 •r♦ •r{ E 0 0 0 0 a) a) G a 0 4-+ E Rf 0 0 0 0 0 -r 1 •H 0 )4 0 0 U) $4 A Q+ U U 0 4-1 44 U Rf • U1N01 r4Lc) 0)NNNNMN Q) U) 0) U) -I-) 4-) -P 'O rU 4J U) 4i r-1 Cu Cu a) r-i 34 14 r--1 r-1 1.1 Rf L� -rl •H E '--1 0 0 0 0 N a) o a) o E r- I Rf 0 0 0 0 0 •ri •ri 0 0 U) )-1 .0 Q+ U 0 0 44 44 U al U • 01 N 00 r 1 N co lO d' N VD "' if l •--1 Cl •--i •--i 0000000 0 Ul00U100000 NUIU)N("4000ON r4C4C'J VDN nrVD •I- M \ \ \ \ \ \ M \ r1-r • E r1 0 a a a) 0 •.4 r--1 Rf O 0 0 0 0 •r-1 •r-I 0 1-1 0 E U) $4 ,C Q, U 0 0 41 4-1 0 RI •-i r-i r-i CT1 En a) 0) 1-1 (f) 0) Cri O a) 10 G U G •r1 U •H 4-) 4-1 (CI >•4 CO r-$ a) MOO II1ECCItD RECREATION ACTIVITY r4r4r4r1r-ir4r4r4vi population resident N co rn •-i buildout population resident Rf - r•� -P Rf • 0 4-) U op 4J co O G 0 0 r1 N a) • V .. U) a) 0 • r-1 • R3 N 4 0 r-i 4-3 A RI It N a) A rti 1-i A a 0 '0 G a-1 U O" G V (0 • r0 44 U 0 Rf G E 4-4rcl u30Cr) aE rl � a) E '0 a r-1 Q \ \ \ 's:3 r-1 CI a) tT Rf A r-1 r-1 r-4 C R0 C) A a) r-1 r--1 r- 1 A a-% O • • •.4 U) -P r4 al 10 Rf 0 >I C a) }-1 a) E-ri a) 4-1 A A A CT a) a) $-+ tT U E f•; .y. 4 4 (I) 4-1 r'O ?1 r-1 1.4 O 1.4 •ri = U) 0 U) 0 G Rf r-4 )-1 -1-1 10 0 3 0 MI A Rf O al 0 0 0 r-+ 0 tnEiGC) U3CCi..=aC.) c=.r a cn r-1 N 3 Source: Table 0 • CO c0 • r-1 0 w U a) 1Q E a• rn xco 4-)rn 0 Z 4-a a) 0A 0 • U R3 0 r-i • • 0 4J '41 CO 1 •4•) rn a) E U 0 A-60 EXHIBIT H-1 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS WITH WHICH NORTH PALM BEACH COORDINATES ITS ACTIVITIES A. Federal Agencies U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development B. State Agencies Florida Department of Community Affairs Florida Department of Environmental Regulation Florida Department of Transportation Florida Department of Natural Resources Florida Department of State (Division of Historial Resources) C. Regional Agencies Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council South Florida Water Management District D. County Agencies Palm Beach County (i.e. County Commission or Specific Departments) Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority Palm Beach County School Board Palm Beach County League of Municipalities E. Special Districts - None. F. Private or Semi -Public Service Providers Florida Power and Light Company Southern Bell Seacoast Utilities Inter -City First Aid Services Diocese of Palm Beach First Presbyterian Church Florida Public Utilities, Inc. Foundation Land Company Centel County Sanitation and Laidlaw Waste Systems SOURCE: LRM, Inc.; 2/88 Source: Table 10-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-61 EXHIBIT H-2 The provision of infrastructure services in North Palm Beach is provided by several operators and implemented by several mechanisms which are summarized in the following table: Infrastructure Service Provider Implementing Mechanism Sanitary Sewer Collection, Transmission Treatment and Disposal Solid Waste Residential Commercial Disposal Drainage Primary System (C-17 Canal Only) Secondary (Local) System Potable Water Treatment, Transmission and Distribution Aquifer Recharge Surface Water Manag. Emergency Water Rationing Seacoast Utilities Authority North Palm Beach County Sanitation Laidlaw Waste Sys. Palm Beach County Solid Waste Auth. So. Fla. Water Management Dist. No. Palm Beach Seacoast Utilities Authority So. Fla. Water Management Dist. So. Fla. Water Management Dist. & N. Palm Beach Interlocal Agreement Operating Budget Occupational Lic. Occupational Lic. Special State Act Fla. Statutes, Chapter 373 Subdivision Reg. Ordinance; Oper- ating budget Interlocal Agreement Chapter 40-E,Fla. Admin. Code Chapter 40-E,Fla. Admin. Code Ordinance Source: Page 10-13, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. DONALD W ca .d 0 PGA BLVD. ROSS Rd. cc co 2 cc a u. o W d co 0 a. m►M Ii0m1 amid )4, 1 NORTHLAKE BLVD. 'Preparation of this nap was aided through financial assistance received for the State of Florida ',the the Local lorerertent Conlrehensiee Planning Assistance Progr at aelhorired by Chapter 116-167, Laws of Florida and adnialstered by the Florida D,partnent of Convnity Affairs.' SOURCE PBC SCHOOL Bd, 2/89 SCALE: 0.96" /MILE EXHIBIT I-1 KEY: t, Allamanda Elementary School A North Palm Beach Elementary School \ \ School District Boundaries 4 a \\\\ 4 31m.nn n$mss. 11MMmiousum 11.,.. CORPORATE LIMITS' PUBLIC HEALTH & SCHQOL FACILITIES rn z Source: Figure 11-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-63 Percent N CC) r- 1 � tC) Co O Cn '-1 V} a) U l.1 a O 1,951,991 N C- N O N O r-1 r♦ ri r1Chet' VD CO N VD N N C1 CI C1 C- 0 N1Il N O m7'Nd'un VD un C1 N .--i 1-•1 r I r-4 N rl ri C1 O d' M r- co Lf) C') O O lfl m' co N .--I C- kD tf1 0 N N Cl ri r-1 LC) Mr I -I VD N CO CO LC) OD a) x. 4) U) • Lc; • �o . x cn co as CU "' v N >1 O +1 x v a) E+) > it a) N C a) C v a) 4 (ts W 44 CO •rri >1 4 • u) > C• A Ir-4 U cn U •r•1 N >1 C9 U U C4 U) .4 a) C r-1 a) •r1 •r1 \ -0 it 1,-1 r-1 CO •ri 4-1 C • r•i U) S-4 a) ro f-1 --1 16 a C A >1 1-4 a A .0 cn w o I1 r•i 4-) 0 a) 0 .0 0 ( 0 9•1 U) Un as CA U C7 CL4 at C) W O 4 O a) 4J v) x •rl C a) a E1 E-I tn 4-1 E $4 - U) a) C RS a) E a) Olr f,.a .0 4-4 a) x a) U >-4 as in 0 O E1 a) 00 a) 4a r-1 U) CT U IO r-I C 1'4 •ri Cn > (u a) a) > a) U U 4) W C Q 1-a 1-4 1-4 U) W O O O O -4 0 0 a) E a) O r-1 I0 U c O r0 �-d 0 r-1 1..1 a) Cl) Cn In 0 a) (CS NNCOCJItD a) C E • 1S C- Cn r-4 Lf1 r-1 i-I U) •rl C- •r1 d' 0 r•1 Lf) N a) C C 'U •. co -I . . . . O C i N .—I N m U c11 U) b N '-i lD co N N tf1 0 •r1 r--I 0) CO -1 CO r-! O1 U) U) • . • mr . . C a) 0 ri 4-1 CP a U 4-I -C.) W -ri c0 4J •r-1 C\ RS CD E14b C ' -a) ro ate) > a) r-I •� 4- E 3 aa)(0 4) 4a) A C (0 OU E > C • r-1 •r U 4-+ a) C ) a▪ l a) C r-1 •rl .0 O1. C 4•1 r1 ' ri ro 9•1 $4 a) a a) I0 0. .0) •r-1 a) co E • 0 Q U C U) U O - c' U i-I U) r-1 O •ri r-I C O • �' fa a) 0a >1 E 0 c 0 U) • c a •r-I 4J 0) •r4 C ` (0 r-( 0 C. 0 C U) ra Cs4 (0 4-1 4►I Cr -ri •ra aJ •,-1 a 'CI O O 0�> C 0 C v r-1 r-1 ,� 0.) r-1 a,4 E U 00 b 0� N O • O • aCa) cnITU) CU cl0 U .c 44 U x 'a a) a b r-1 0 . CIa) i a) O ► b 0) r- C 4-1 a) CC) 0-... 1-4 .H .. U) ra U) a O > 1z1 CT(0 a) c'C•U) rri E 0 x r-i —I U •r 1 ,-4 C B . -ri . . r-1 I11 ro o a) 14 O a) C>a r- .j.) C •rl •r-I O a) U O 1-+ 4.) c-- El) ca U U •ri 1-1 C U) U U) O1 L1 r- a $,.I •r4 •ri U) +1 a) a) S E O N O E-+ >`t 4- U) a) U >1 a) 'O 0 O Z N E a) +1 +) a) w co a C) U r-i C CT U U 4-1 (Q 4-I c a r-1 E -U O� � rt C a) a) 0 Cr r-10 4-1 U O al O U) r-i r •r•1 4 r-1 f-I •r-1 ra 0 a) C w •• tvr,+) ••wwau.cUx1-1w a) HQ W a) (0 r-i U) U a) U 4-i rt a) 4-4 • • 4.1 U) a) 43 4-1 a Q) '-1 • Z O E1 Z rl N rn d' Lfl .o r- co U) U 0 CJ) A-64 '1 ** REVENUES Memberships * EXHIBIT I-3 Enterprise_Fund_Revenues_-_1986/87 Revenue ($) Percent of Total Golf 476,837 45.4 Pool 51,293 4.9 Tennis 28,636 2.7 Social 1,103 0.1 Sports Activities* 447,431 42.6 Clubhouse & Misc.** 44,984 4.3 Total EXPENDITURES 1,050,284 100.0 Sports Activities Golf Course Maint. 380,272 37.2 Golf Shop 57,052 5.6 Golf carts 86,369 8.5 Pool 98,013 9.6 Tennis 55,153 5.4 Clubhouse 132,477 13.0 Depreciation 88,863 8.7 Insurance 17,500 1.7 Admin/General 105,386 10.3 Total 1,021,085 100.0 * Greens fees; Golf Cart Rental; Lease Income -golf; Locker Rentals; Lease Income - Driving Range; Golf Hand'icap'Service; Members Guest Fees -Pool; Learn -to -swim Program; Pool Rentals; Lease Income -Pool; Resident Swim Fees; Tennis fees; Tennis Rentals; and Lease Income -Tennis. Lease Income - Food and Beverage; Interest; Discounts and PEnalties; Forecast Ads; Commission - Vending Telephone; Utilities Refund - Food and Beverage; and Other. Source: Table 11-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT I-4 Annual Debt Service General Fund Fiscal Year 1987 Series ($) Village Total ($) 1988 185,122 185,122 1989 178,813 178,813 1990 171,625 171,625 1991 179,125 179,125 1992 180,375 180,375 1993 170,625 170,625 1994 160,500 160,500 Total 1,226,185 1,226,185 SOURCE: Official Bond Statement Village of North Palm Beach, Florida Refunding Improvement Revenue Bonds Series 1987 Enterprise Fund Fiscal Year 1988 Loan ($)* 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 77,515 154,895 156,106 153,239 147,081 141,119 •TOTAL 829,955 *Does not constitute general indebtedness to North Palm Beach. Debt service financed from Country Club revenues. SOURCE: Loan Amortization Schedule; NCNB National Bank, January 22, 1989; Loan Note, December 19, 1989. Source: Table 11-3, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT I-5 NORTH PALM BECH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, 1990-1995 Project Description Target Year Status* Estimated Cost FUTURE LAND USE FACILITIES None Scheduled NA NA NA TRAFFIC CIRC. FACILITIES Resurfacing Local Streets Annual R $40,000 POTABLE WATER FACILITIES Not Village's Responsibility NA NA NA SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES Not Village's Responsibility NA NA NA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES Centralized Toxic Household/ Commercial Solid Waste Collection Feasibility Sty. 1992 ED $15,000 Purchase 1 Packer & 2 Jitney Trucks Annual R $62,500 DRAINAGE FACILITIES Drainage Study - Planning Area 7 1994 ED $12,500 Drainage Study - Sandlewood Basin 1994 Ed $12,500/ Master Drainage Study 1991/92 ED $22,500/ 22,500 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Master Recre. Plan & User Study 1990 ED $20,000 HOUSING FACILITIES None Scheduled NA NA NA CONSERVATION MEASURES C-17 Canal Bank Erosion Control Study 1992 ED $10,000 Lake Side Park Erosion Control Study 1990 ED $11,000 COASTAL MEASURES None Scheduled NA NA NA * ED - Existing Deficiency; PN - Projected Need; R- Replacement SOURCE: Land Research Management, Inc., 3/89 Source: Table 11-5, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. A-67 EXHIBIT I-6 5-YEAR SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS, 1990-1995 Consistant Project Schedule Projected General Revenue With Other Description (Fiscal Yr.) Cost Location Source Elements FUTURE LAND USE FACILITIES None Scheduled NA NA NA NA NA TRAFFIC CIRC. FACILITIES Resurfacing Village- General Local Street Annual $40,000 Wide Fund Yes POTABLE WATER FACILITIES Not Village's Responsibility NA NA NA . NA NA SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES Not Village's Responsibility NA NA NA NA NA SOLID WASTE FACILITIES Centralized Toxic Household/ Commercial Solid Waste Collection Village- General Feasibility Sty. 1992 $15,000 Wide Fund Yes DRAINAGE FACILITIES Coop Drainage Planning General Study A 1994 $12,500 Area 6&7 Fund Yes Coop Drainage Planning General Study B 1994 $12,500 Area 7 Fund Yes Master Drainage Village General Study A 1991 $22,500 Wide Fund Yes Master Drainage Village General Study B 1992 $22,500 Wide Fund Yes RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Master Recre. Plan & User Village General Survey 1990 $20,000 Wide Fund Yes Rev: 10/16/89 EXHIBIT I-6 (Continued) HOUSING FACILITIES None Scheduled NA NA NA NA NA CONSERVATION MEASURES C-17 Canal Bank Erosion Control Planning General Study 1992 $10,000 Area 4B/5 Fund Lake Side Park Erosion Control Planning General Study 1990 $11,000 Area 3A Fund COASTAL MEASURES None Scheduled NA NA NA NA SOURCE: Land Research Management, Inc., 3/89 Yes Yes NA Source: Table 11-2, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT I-7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS EXPENDITURE POTENTIAL GENERAL FUND CAPITAL BUDGET LESS PLANNED SURPLUS AVAIL. FISCAL YEAR POTENTIAL* ($) EXPENDITURES ($) ** CAPITAL ($) 1989/90 240,000 133,500 106,500 1990/91 260,000 125,000 135,000 1991/92 290,000 150,000 140,000 1992/93 340,000 102,500 237,500 . 1993/94 390,000 127,500 262,500 . * AVAILABLE AS CAPITAL OUTLAY OR FOR DEBT SERVICE **FROM TABLE 11-5 SOURCE: LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC. 10/89 T11-5.NPB/P4/WS Source: Table 11-7, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Support Documentation; October, 1989. EXHIBIT I-8 NORTH PALM BEACH LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD POTABLE WATER AVERAGE DAY WATER CONSUMPTION RATE Residential - 99 gallons/capita/day Non-residential*- 1,874 gallons/acre/day MAXIMUM DAY WATER CONSUMPTION RATE Residential - 147 gallons/capita/day Non-residential*- 2,782 gallons/acre/day Storage Capacity Average Daily Flow x 0.5 (The above rates are tb be used only as a planning guide for the Village of North Palm Beach. Actual determination of flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, and main extension charges shall be negotiated by individual property owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority through the Developer's Agreement process.) SANITARY SEWER AVERAGE DAY SEWAGE GENERATION RATE Residential - 66 gallons/capita/day Non-residential*- 1,060 gallons/acre/day MAXIMUM DAY SEWAGE GENERATION RATE Residential - 104 gallons/capita/day Non-residential*- 1,721 gallons/acre/day (The above rates are to be used only as a planning guide for the Village of North Palm Beach. Actual determination of flow rates used as a basis for plant capacity, main extension and tax charges shall be negotiated by individual property owners and Seacoast Utilities Authority through the Developer's Agreement process.) SOLID WASTE AVERAGE GENERATION RATE Residential Single-family - 0.926 tons/capita/year Multiple family- 0.588 tons/capita/year Non-residential 6.0 tons/acre/year Rev: 10/16/89 FACILITY DRAINAGE (Interim LOS: Ref: Policy 2.1; SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, DRAINAGE, POTABLE WATER AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE element) GROUNDWATER RECHARGE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION (Interim LOS: Ref: Policy 1.5 TRAFFIC CIRCULATION element) RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT I-8 (Continued) LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD DESIGN STORM Three year frequency, 24-hr. duration (one -day); Rainfall intensity curve, as established by the South Florida Water Management District. IMPERVIOUS AREA Residential Single-family - main building first floor area shall not exceed 40% of the total lot area. Multiple -family - main building first floor area shall not exceed 35% of the total site area. Non-residential Main building first floor building area shall not exceed a minimum of 35% of the total site area; however, specific district regulations as per the Village Zoning Code shall apply. County Collector Rdwys - LOS Standard C/Peak Hr.D State Minor Arterials - LOS Standard C/Peak Hr.D State Principal Arterials - LOS Standard C/Peak Hr.D Exception: Prosperity Farms Road - LOS Standard D/ Peak Hour D UNIT/POPULATION Neighborhood Parks - 2 ac/1,000 Community Parks - 1 ac/1,000 Beaches - 1 mile/31,250 Marinas - 1 slip/2,500 Boating - 1 ramp/6,250 Golf Courses - 9 holes/30,000 Swimming - 1 pool/31,250 Tennis - 1 court/2,500 Basketball - 1 court/6,250 Shuffleboard - 1 court/6,250 Rev: 11/1/89 EXHIBIT I-8 (Continued) FACILITY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD Baseball/softball - 1 field/7,200 Football/soccer - 1 field/4,800 Handball/racquetball - 1 court/6,000 Playground areas - 1 area/3,600 Volleyball - 1 court/7,200 *Non -Residential includes the following land use types: Commercial, Public Buildings, Educational and Other Public Buildngs. SOURCE: LRM, Inc., 3/89 tll-1.npb Source: Table 11-1, Village of North Palm Beach Florida Comprehensive Plan; October, 1989. .11.V.H ail JO HIAIII alI IV ScIVIN ISll GMV'I ONIISIXE H XIGt EddV S L-a vL-g EL -a Z l.-a L L-g oL-a 6 -g 8 -a L -g 9 -g S -a 7v -g 8 -a z -g L -g abed (dpY1) asn pupa buT4sTXa L PeIV buTUU Td (c14) asn pupa buT.sTxa g9 pa.xy buTuuwTd (dPY1) asn pupa buT4STXa V9 P9JV buTuupTd (dpw) asn pupa buTgSTXa S pa.xy buTuuPld dP ) asn pupa buTq.sTxa gt pazy buTuupTd (crew) asn pupa buT;sTxa v{, pe.xy buTuupTd (dPW) asn pupa buff s Txa g£ pa.zy buTuupTd (dPW) asn pupa buT4sTXa g8 pazf buTuuwTd (dPW) asn pupa buTgsTXa VE pe.zy buTuup[d (dPW) asn pupa buTpsTxa Z pexV buTuupTd (dPW) asn pupa bu gsTxa L pa.zv buTuupTd • saT.zaS dPW asn pupa buT4sTxa : Aex dpw spazy buTuupTd uopag UiTpd tP.10N seuoz pooT3 deL1 SZTos pezTTp.IaueD •x•V•a am 30 awis am sv SdVW asn UNVt DNissixa a xiaNNaaV S L-g t L-g EL-g ZL-g LL-a oL-a 6 -g 8 -a L -a 9 -a s -a 17 -a 8 -g z -a L -a gTclTuxa • 96 / Z • Aag = 686 1. ' .za(4o4ap : uoTgpiquauinaou q.toddns ppTaoT3 uapag u1Ted gq.zoN go a6 TTTA ' S L-8 aanbT3 : aa.lnos •�j 000E/•ul . :31VOS •••%4:1/ 9 dVW STOS Q3Z11VH3N3D L-EI LISIHXa tX31.91oZ ONr1 Nravn4/30Nisve 'II (X31dMo3 O11r1 mravn) VE131A1b'01 ONVS 3N1d11139N1Sb8 '6 tx311ao3 amyl mraun)V0003 '8 orindnoo ONr1 Nrovn) int3AVNt'/0 'L T'T-Z6# quaiupuaure L-96# 1 01 • 01 quaiupuauwV (X211)1o1 Oxv1 Nrcvn)H3V39 W1dd •9 S3N0d38 'C dWVlAS 1b011 •f ONb1 NYai1tl •F SIN3WWVSd1Z11`1d11b 'Z (x31dw03 akrl Nro1111)s1N31It/ 'I :A3)1 S11W1� 31V8Od1:100. L-96# quauxpueuv 01iQluuaN 9't-Z6# 'L • T-Z64t4'.91't-Z6# sluatupuamy Z•T-Z6# quatupueury z—g O H 0 G C (D (D rtw A) rt� 0` �• C O O N rt) 0• CCU n0 t•t, z lfl 0 LO ro C N b� (D l0 � 0, 0 0 n iZ C • • 0 rt 18 3Nb11-1luON N 0 z rn III N O rn X rr x z z �o rr, Cr• r, 0 0 t N O z • 1 cjaa+rit ail a•_` ; i C` x go tb c; Nz god m r_ 0 as n 3 z m# > \ I CO r n (ID O n d j 0 } • n 4 G G � n (D N rtw W I N• . 0 C .. N. O I -1 n a rt • 00 rr 00 K 1-h z —I O Ln cort Lo row cD F c� m N O �a rn� 0 n w • • O rr '6961 'Jago400 :uoT4E3uawnooU .1oddns PpTaoTj 110E9g WTEd LP-10N Jo ebw[TTA ' L L-E aTgEs : aoinos f �.r'F"t.:ram" r•.r47 '1 NE311Vd (1-£ 31ifDId :d31i :Na3111/d ON) S133113 AtIVWlad (9-C 31:10Jld•:d31:1 41d3111rd ON) 1131VM 1NVOVA S3111110Vd °nand 831410 1VNO11V3na3 SGNnoso /SJNla1ln8 OI'18ld NOI1VAa38NO0 30VdS N3dO /NOI1V311338 1V1083WwO0 1V11N3a1S311 AlISN3a HDIH 1V11N3GIS3a 111SN30 WnIa3W 1VI1N3a1S31i A1tSN30 MO1 AUOD31V0 3Sn aNV1 S311A3S dVMI 3Sn (INV1 DNI1S1X3 :A3)1 dVW i-a siaixxa '686L 'aagogop ftioTququawnooa ;aoddns PpTioT3 uoaag wTEd LID.zoN ;o abeTTTA e.znbTa : aoanos IN"ib�d "H1.1=f0N S3I1:13S dVW 3SnQNV1 ONLLSIX3 d�W 3Sn CNY1 DNIISIX3 �= L VEldt/ DNINNV 1ci c eai9-sa i/t11t111t{/1T1 Q. 111 0 6L ode - * •i>i 3a2 a2eaS vinso T3 a- lms 0T3olsTH 'say .tii 'i a16utS - 38d/Sa 4. 4lu110' 4,vJe W(<d 'saki dltunj-111^W - OZ-W11 •saa 4LI&$ d a16u,S - !:-Sa L1 tag t.+1,1^1tf t SPC I l3I OS i unr 1N30'drOtt 2 1 lgnd - d •utwon P411W11 - vIO •Wu1c3 Poo4.3og46 1 aN - IO •saa 4i isuaO 461H - E2i •saa .t!Wsd 1#16u1S - lb SL3I2t1SI0 ON1N0Z H3et38 141dd H180N 1 1-E 318W1 1 d3a - 3003 asn ONd1 -rt- ' Sl I W I1 3.L 8OdU00 s -8 Iimm8 133dO 9 O 1/�Itl011 }-lovaa rill/IIIt1111111t11111t11tllit►ttllt{It11�lT—�f a v L7 C:Elf • rivNYo s.it•DMI '11tf1 I$3VAoa 11-3 1,13A111 P111Y3 • 1:111111111111t1.11 dYW 3Sf1 CNV7 °Ni1SIX3 ' 96/Z 'AeU = 626 L '.Iagogoo = UPTd eATsuaua.ldwo3 PpT.zoT,3 goPag U1TPd 144-10N go abPTTTA ' L L-E e1nbla : aa.znoS 'f ' b4 ♦ i ` i'1'ajq'ti, 111 . .� i 1 i?'t:tili't1�F, : : i iuiln�?i:ii:it X :: r;?' . ...:::::::.v ?:•:;:::. ♦ e 111`�ilt;t'tlli. l:l `i' :• •:' i t.1is-•.tt. � ....:[:•`':?:r,.•' ....•��....���'�:::-:�•:. i ix h•41 133J 009 OOt 0 1 I I I HO`d3H 1 LAI1 tyQ1d Z ONINNV1d 1• 11Xi`1'1A S3Id3S dVW • s�Ji1tY; 3Snawv- JNIISIX3c- •, zt , c�♦• , •Ww03 IeJaua9 — 93 •sau dl !suaa WnfPJN - I-icl *saki Al lsuaa 46'H - 1121 .t;uno3 4pea8 wltd •wwo0 leJauao -1-J3 •}30 Ieuo!ssa;oJd - Od suap.ieo tlzea8 wled : SNO I lO I aS I dflr 1N30tirod Dllgnd - d •4dq/•sad .cilsuaa 46!H - Ed *sad XllWed a16ulS - 121 121-'4s10 *ww03 Pa3 !W!1 - b'13 1,1zJa&Wo3 poo4Jog461.N - 13 S10Id1SIa DNINOZ H3ti38 wiled H12iOrl I 1-E 318%01 : d3d - 3003 3Sfl own :SiI�JI, 3140210d2103 :A3)1 9-8 SIgIHX� T • T-Z6# 1LNawaNaNV avow 13NOW- rT •T 1 .\ :I72 Asa - .....,..., � II111111111111110 I/I1iI 1 ;I r � • 11 1, tr \i 1 1 ll , -9E • • • OP j 1.1111.1.111� �. 1D 14o. OA18 VJc L-S 3 zrr z' --WI 13 a c13 -0cnD 1111Dm-4 r m rzx3n Q3 -•4o mvr —10 mm3 —►7 D n e CrO C) 1-4 ao > > " 0 N m 0 0 -•Q21 0 A 3 a� Z-� cl 3>aD n • ZA —3avr — A N 7 3, - n A .X 1 y 1n 1 m L-El SIiLIHX1 •96/Z .nag =686 L '.zagogop :uoi;l?quawnooQ gioddns EpTioT,3 go2ag wTpd qq.loN go abpTTTA ' E L-E a.tnbi3 : ao1nos (. It TTTtiii voido,si HovaE3 V111dd H1L•i ON SC V3U1/ JNINNV id S3Ia3S dew 3SflaNV1 ONIISIX3 tt/t•0111 •R111 IiarnoR � J �1 . - va I O'14 Jo Wei LI aiIZOOKLM SOU ICOOliI V 4.1 94zMJYT• 7wt:r77Qido.1 JOUWZA00 irTvt SOIL OOY • Wltt11J JO WWI AL tOSJ JAW. • 0000&L all iTTYIDOVotj ro. CON &!V. &i&L JO tO12MR10114 WILL l -TlttYJJV tst•^'a`", JO SIOAt:�trOO 7LL &jilt AMMO= I I K 1 r N r 3 L I- 3) !13 A l li N M W tl d 3 t- 17011f) tora■ lend &lilac JO UNTIL i41i j& ttat+rna/a - - - - • • - - • • i • 0 • 2 • • • • • • 4. • p! lgRd - d l! 1 OJaWWO3 paf ! W I l - 4013 l!!34.WWo3 poogJog46laN - 13 (pa}Ua1J0 }SIJno1,) ll13JiWW03 - 83 l! f OJiWIUO3 - v3 ;u.W}Jldvpsatl Jt} isuad 46lH - EN •saa xilWtd al5u!S - 1I S13I211SI0 SNINOZ H01738 W1tid H1210N t t-c 318401 :d3M - 3003 3Sfl 0N01 : SI I W I l 3140210d803 :A3)1 e-s LIHI� 1, • L_ 3' d. • £y 12 6-g 0 crt- b' 1•• j CO W • 0 n 0 rr 3C V3L11f JNINNVid S31d3S dVW 3Sfl NV1 DNIISIX3 �.1 6[; pw� •yl I iok K o, • uOM 7. m D z V r 6-g sigzxxa qaoddns ppTaoTa qopag 000t 009 00t 0 I I I w-cmdalat }_rovaa Vrlvd 1-11.1:1CIN v • Vt V31:1V ONINNVid SEIldaS dVW asnaNvi DNIISIX3 cWVd 3sn CNV1 ONIISIX3 LOILWO * otTa JOIS ON Olen CPPOI4 11111 TS OT20211111 icind •d 4 fr tZ•Imialio3 Pa% !men - VT3 df 1ep.iatuwo3 poosiJoqq15!•N - T3 islz.tawwo3 - v3 ustu;Jedtv•so8 .c4 !sus° 146 - cal •sa8' istrej •IbutS - T8 S.1.3I21.1.S IC ONINOZ H3V38 1.11tod H.UiON ti-t 31SW1 :d38 - 3003 3Sn ONV1 -1S1.114I1 3.1.4080d803 :A331 adanuca 626L 'goo !uoT4equawn000 mTPd 144.10N go al5PTTTA 'cL-E V .9 V / 6 -;' ---- - ---,-..f...,,------! •„...,' '' ,t+ ,./:-.2,7_, ,,,,,,,----.....2!",,iii.1).,..• 7.. , ... , 111 I I 1............ i•••••• •1« •!....14,.•.,...• . . • • f . :".-.4...•••••••••-• 1 1 , . . r.....„ , ... "•• •, 1 . , . I • i . ; ': i . 1. . I . :I:: ,i.. I :: .." I•:: ', 1 I 1 ',1.I d• ,.1. • , iot I II.• I •• , Ir... •2; •• .".4./.., . • :' .t..!,... ‘ I „ :• • i • . • , ... •1,-.---i______ i.:.1::i.;• .: 1-/./ !---;.....___ , 1 /..i7---•,--- !t '7'1 ' 1 ' 't 0.• ' r i • i .../: • ,... cia.,. • • puo...x • ' ..... • 0,11, ...4 : .. ••••"4:•....:. fi• p,1H..! , I • LI .. .../.,., , • eV** l••••••••• •i LLITT r''i .....‘.1i.::1) i • . ! ••' .. • • . eanEtTa :90.1nOS IIJMl•Ptin Is2sins.• )fr 4s,fr 19114 ••••• a 1..• . t\l'A s ••••• • • • 7.0;. 11 0 Id • 96/Z .A 1 = 686 L '.19go40o :uoTTPquaUInD0U 4.zoddns Pp?1oT3 gopag lured LP-zoN ;o ebwTTTA ' 9 L-E aznbTa :aoznos 0 c s n T r C as/t•3Nf R•v.: -NPBSD AMENDMENT 90-2 EXISTING LANDUSE MAP SERIES st► VJtIV JNINNV1d • .m 0101 51;14 0 r Cy o rrrrrrrrrrrrrr Avme3lym . . • • • • • • • ss/s c) Z r n oz.o -onnnMM7J-icm CO D W N— S O i i i i i D m -D i t•I vZnn=Zu)Z.nm c o o - c -• or rT- 9 3to_—D-to n Cr n O n n 71 _ CO �--yam x.. ? a a a 3 w N m 0. ^ X `C — ►-. ft,• Umoco • �n \ to CI) fo nrr D .I 41 CD w -- 0)� m co r zti � T C. L rn v1-1 0 (DSIIt 0 rt 0 t3-m 0 Z Lo 0 Coll k.1Drt ►izi c a N to \(D k.o C 0 0 n s✓ • • 0 1-1 O m z co 0 De 1N. oa z m0 D33 m a n "1 -4 o Z II o D o D r r"-' n a r— mcDo. ZODo Z9 m� — rT--a7m_-1 CGm \ao\�m D wN = o -1:,-0M rw Z cm m0ow m _11 1 1 1 1 1 mwoo--i l mac.-DrZizo= �m i 1 0 70a „ZIP, = coax -.' c o cn— -- ?_c m-- - a p n 2- 0 1'D n I -4 iD ID * - `� -I (1 N S w ry m O n ►•. • O O -m Bs aZ' -o — a < < - — • �xz -a a n O rp rp M w 0 a9•• r O -- M cn • to 0n•o m i A N -•- A,•_�Y n w "7 0.. 1 _n r* , -� 9 co0,as-• n o � rt rn H 96/Z 'Ilea =6861. '.zagogop :uoTgPquewnooa - qioddnS PpTioT3 gopag wTed gp•p°N Jo eB TTTA ' 8 L-8 a1n5T3 : aoznoS 1.334 0001 009 00Z romsond H=`tY3i3 lArivd V9 v31:111 DNINNd1d S3I113S db'W 3SlaNb1 DNILSIX3 dVW 3Sfl aNV'I DNILSIX3 'sou .cj,!tnrej a16u!S - 38d/S8 AIuno3 vpea8 wied • •sa8 .cf !sua0 wn!paw - 98d/t.Qi eaJd luawdolanao pauueld - DBd/V0d • aD!}}0 leuo!ssatoJd - 98d/Od le!DJeww00 poo*Jog146!aN - 9Bd/NZ suapJep yoea8 wled SNOI:oIoslam 1N3ovroti D!Ignd - d auawlJedty/•saa .cl !sua0 46!H - E8 'sae <t!W d-!flnW - Za 'sae .clawed al6u!S - Ia S131815'0 9NIN32 HOti38 L.r1ad H1a0N t t - c 318r1 : 38 - 3000 3Sf1 Oritil •� - : S1 I W I1 31tidOd800 E L -a SIIiRXa ft s 0 3r Ib' IZ i alTi. :•:•:: b081!YH ` I111:134:1S0lid 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 t —S. t t t t t t t 1. 1 t 1 1:11111111t t1�11111 • t' L-96 11111111• - ;.ioddns ppTaoTd hopes '626l '.zago;op :uoT;P;uawnooQ WTpd t44.10h jo abpT T TA ' 6 L - E alnbz3 : aoanos li3d 0001 009 00C 0 I vandal., HDdaE3 w-tdd H11:1DN 99 V31:11/ ON1NNV1d S31U13S db�W 3SnaNvi ONIISIX3 dYVl 3Sl cINY1 °NU -SIX! 3llgnd — d sold 141141.d-now - zld *sold .used •1auls - IS Sl3ItJLSIO DNINOZ H3t13S Nltid HSHON t t -c 31ad1 : 3t! - 3003 3sn ONti1 - sS.INIl 3140210dt100 •A331 1VL-11 J1I IHX 12� Id Id rti 3)4V1 1S3M fro �+ .1 i w:� w i... w i 7- 1. ., , ! �• :-7 ifirrrrrrrrTTTTITTITTITTTT •i aO8UVN A11UBdSOUd ;Li ! •.ir•ZMI •wii $IID11nOs Z11 Ohl ' 96 / Z ' neH = 686 L ' .zagogop : uoTTequatunooQ q.zoddns EpT�oT3 goPeg ur[ d q ON go abpTTTA 'OZ-E a1nbTa :eoJnos 1B/ 314t 'Win ti3M411O11 +118'T-Z6# 'L'T-Z6# '9'T-Z6# �I : SZNSWQN3wv ~ �• i}:�;$>`p`c'`:� v:%�'"SD�"�+itn� � . 1 : ! ®i � � .(/may ... •, ` T c�%�j\� • .� ��yq�y�pyr,��riy�`^�^y. �Wif£�. ��Y++j�.{��( gAy+��gR,... ., ;"�.�.. �.i:_`{'I•fl.:•..�� t tS7a5flGCai RS�tFS Eii�, 0001 VOILIO'1J 1334 009 00z 0 I I H J \/ 8 lAr bid H J U D N 711 = 111 Z2' ly Z U • '•'•?''it "�i�fG�`r.`•"r.��:•�•`:{:+1::���''••....��•�;ti�i'�!•�;•:;•t•::aiai..�:.::._; II I_..� i ► ► ► ^ 8 r. (jltt1 riyl_1 Eriit''rii��1J: :l •wu S L -g ZIgIHXa • -Jr( V L V lV JNINNV1d SJIU3S dVW 3snaWv1 ONI1S!X9 dVVd 3Sn aNd1 DNI.SIX3 •sav aId!2In11 - o©d!IIJ •saJ ctlwe3 albu!S - 30d/S2J A)uno3 tlDea© wIeJ asn luawuuanon - o8d/no Ie!Jawwoo IeJauao - r1E3d/i-JD •saJ ,ca !suao wn!paw - 8pd/II2J suap.le9 tlpea8 wleJ su0113las1it1r JI.133vrat D! Iclud - d • -a21 A l Jwr.i- ! I I''I1 - 221 •sa21 •(1Iwej albu!s - 1J S.l :)) n I S 1 o 9141119: 113v3f1 I lVd I11 21f)11 1 !-f ,J3:I - 300D 3S11 nIW 1 --� . S 1 1 111 1 31 V21()d2I():) of-C 3UnJld